If you listen to the first minute and a half of that BBC interview he says at one point:
“… When I read back the emails I had errr written and I did that when Derek ahhh Draper called me and said that he thought his emails had been hacked into and errr we had a discussion about this, I thought and and he thought that the main issue was some emails that I had sent, err, about racism in the comments in the Guido Fawkes website.”
Now you may recall that Iain Dale and Guido both sent in Freedom of Information requests about the smear campaign directed at us from within Downing Street. Obviously Guido was aware of the existence of the emails (having said as much on Andrew Neil’s Daily Politics). The emails basically instructed Draper on how to frame and phrase the smear.
Damian has now publicly confirmed that he sent them (in February, when Draper started smearing Dale and Guido as racists). So why did the Cabinet Office produce some of the emails regarding Dale, but not the ones regarding Guido? Guido only got emails sent by Draper, not the emails sent by McBride. Guido has re-submitted an FoI to the Cabinet Office asking again for the emails Damian has now publicly confirmed he sent.
When Enoch Powell died Tony Blair led the tributes:
“He was one of the great figures of 20th-century British politics, gifted with a brilliant mind.”
February 9, 1998
Now what was it Mandelson was saying?
Via Mark Reckons
UPDATE : Here is what Hannan wrote for the Telegraph in 2007 on the subject of how “any reference to Enoch Powell provokes huge controversy“
For what it’s worth, I think Enoch Powell was wrong on immigration. The civil unrest that he forecast, and that many feared in 1968, didn’t materialise. Britain assimilated a large population with an ease that few countries have matched. Being an immigrant myself, I have particular cause to be grateful for Britain’s understated cosmopolitanism.
Guido saw Hannan’s interview with the Reason Foundation’s Michael Moynihan pop up in his feed reader this morning.
Not really paying attention Guido let the video play in the background and got on with other things until he heard “Enoch Powell” mentioned. Uh oh, was the immediate reaction. Hannan said he admired Powell as “somebody who understood the importance of national democracy, who understood why you need to live in an independent country and what that meant, as well as being a free marketeer and a small government Conservative.”
This could get interesting Guido thought, and sure enough within hours a Labour contact asked what my opinion of the Reason Foundation was – the Foundation is a West Coast libertarian outfit which is respectable and cerebral – well as respectable as right-wing Californian dope-fiends are ever going to be.
Guido spoke to Dan to ask him when he gave the interview – about “a month or so” ago was his answer – before the NHS kerfuffle cemented Dan in the affections of Labour’s spin operation. He said it wasn’t the first time he said that, that he wasn’t going to deny his view in the future and that on immigration he was on the record as taking the Friedmanite free market liberal view rather than the restrictive Powellite stance.
Dan asked how did Guido think it was going to play out. “Well there is no news about and if Labour get Liam Byrne or Mandelson to put the boot in…”
Sure enough Mandelson has popped up: “Yet again, we are seeing the two faces of the Conservative Party. The one they want to present to the public and the one which attacks the NHS and praises Enoch Powell.” Predictable.
The usually fair minded Mark Hanson of LabourHome has written a very poor piece of analysis – claiming that it is dog-whistle stuff. He also reckons Hannan is deliberately provoking “the Notting Hill set” to stoke up “his fan base” in the Conservative Party. Two problems with that analysis are Hannan has been on holiday in France for the last fornight and the interview was filmed weeks ago, before the NHS kerfuffle. The first Dan knew about this blow-up was when Guido called him this afternoon. The dog-whistle is fatally undermined in that Powell was cited by Hannan in a list of influences which included Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek – all of whom were ideologically opposed to immigration restrictions. The fact is that Hannan and his ideological fan base (such as it is) are more liberal on immigration policy than the official Labour Party position…
Chris Galley from the Sunlight Centre for Open Politics has made Guido promise to be careful what he writes and the law firm Sunlight have retained has made it clear that they would prefer silence, however since Guido’s readers have donated thousands of pounds towards getting a prosecution started, you deserve an update.
The lawyers are in the evidence gathering phase – they want to establish from multiple sources the truth – Guido is under strict instructions not to elaborate or speculate. This will go on for some months apparently.
Still no word from the Met over which MPs they will be prosecuting – don’t think the issue of MPs’ expense fiddles has gone away – come the general election it will be an issue and will result in the biggest clear out of MPs since the second World War. It ain’t over until the fat lady sings…
You can donate here. Sunlight is going to regularly publish details of donations and expenditure (down to the last penny) online. Showing the way by example…
David Rowland, the property developer tycoon says of the million he has bunged the Tories this year:
“I made the donation as a result of my passionate concern for liberty and the economic future of Britain. We need fresh ideas, national renewal and above all a Government that sets the people free. I feel strongly that the Conservatives under the leadership of David Cameron are the party that will deliver that. They are the best hope for this country’s future.”
Guido is hard pressed to think of any Tory policies that will set the people free. The only outstanding libertarian commitment they have made is to abolish ID cards. Cameron rarely speaks about freedom, the Tories sound more like technocratic managerialists than freedom fighters…
If things had gone slightly differently for David Cameron instead of being on the verge of becoming PM, he could be yet another former public school boy who ended up squandering his privileges and doing jail time for possession of cannabis and cocaine. The current President of America could just be another black ex-con from a broken home.
If there is one message that comes through from The Wire, it is that the war on drugs can not be won and that it corrupts all of society – not just those in the drug gangs – the police and politicians as well. It is far from fictional, apart from the corrupting effect the police waste time which could be better spent fighting crimes of violence and against property. It costs a couple of billion a year to seize half a billion worth of drugs. The jails are full of young people who could, if they had not been criminalised, gone on to become leaders like Obama and Cameron. If drugs were decriminalised we would waste less money and lives than we do now.
The criminal justice system would be freed up to deal with pressing problems greater than students smoking pot and ravers taking ecstasy. Addicts would be treated within the healthcare system, not the criminal justice system. Addicts deserve pity, not incarceration. Decriminalising drug use and treating it as a health problem would in a stroke undermine the gangsters and drug trafficker just as ending prohibition undermined the mafia. The biggest beneficiaries of drug prohibition are the crime bosses.