August 20th, 2012

Guardian Gaza Spin Unravels

The Guardian has come under heavy fire over the last week for running an opinion piece by Joshua Trevino, a journalist who sparked controversy by saying he was “cool” with the idea of the IDF shooting American citizens on a flotilla bound for Gaza:

When Al Jazeera reported on the story and claimed Trevino had been hired as a correspondent, the Guardian contacted them demanding that they issue a correction since apparently he was only a freelance contributor. However, judging by these before and after shots of two press releases from the paper, it looks like some creative editing has been going on at Guardian towers:



First they announce Trevino as a new member of their editorial team, then demote him to a mere commentator. The Guardian has some nerve asking for a correction when they have had to correct themselves…


  1. 1
    Init says:


  2. 2
    SP4BS says:

    In Britain we have the “cricket test”.

  3. 3
    alex weir says:

    Guardian is and has been for 40 years a FAKE leftwing newspaper. Just as socialist workers party uk is in fact run by mi5. Time for skeletons to exit cupboard en masse….. alex weir, gaborone, botswana

  4. 4
    Sunshine says:

    Commentator, editor … the man is nasty.

    Thank you pointing this out, but I only read the Guardian when it is the last paper left abandonned in a luggage rack and I have a three hour journey ahead of me.

  5. 5
    Genuinely curious says:

    I would never have thought that M15 would be able to assemble such an array of half-wits in one place. That is very good work if it is true. Do you have any evidence or is this just a modern myth?

  6. 6
    Guido Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf Fawkes says:

    Why couldnt this have been on the main site? You must be having cashflow issues to need to falsify the figures to this extent Guido.

  7. 7
    Anonymous says:

    Hang on though, we are cool with the IDF shooting yanks arnt we?

  8. 8
    [insert name here] says:

    “The Guardian has some nerve asking for a correction when they have had to correct themselves…”

    Errr, what? They correct their mistakes so they have a nerve asking others to correct theirs?

    That doesn’t even begin to make sense.

  9. 9
    Wot no TippEx says:

    Maybe it was just a typo?

  10. 10
    [insert name here] says:

    What was that? I couldn’t hear you through the tin foil hat.

    Run by mi5. Brilliant. That’ll keep me amused for the rest of the week.

  11. 11
    Andrew Efiong says:

    I’m cool with this guy and The Guardian looking like a boatload of plonkers.

  12. 12
    Anonymous says:

    The majority would be cooler with the yanks shooting the IDF.

  13. 13
    a non says:

    Thought the recent rabbi written “The King’s Torah” explained that the chosen people can bump anyone off with the exception of their own kind.

  14. 14
    JadedJean says:

    Ditto for charging usurious interest.

  15. 15
    Tay King-dePisse says:

    Or IDS shooting Stephanie Flanders, come to that.

  16. 16
    Anonymous says:

    Does every fucker in the BBC get a free paper everyday? What about benefit in kind?

  17. 17
    Bibi Netanyahu says:

    I’m pretty cool with the IDF detonating a tactical nuke in an Iranian power station…er…I meant nuclear missile site…Doh!

  18. 18
    Jacky Treehorn says:

    No! You lefties are so deluded.

  19. 19
    DZ says:

    not awkard it is fucking dishonesty, total bullshit

  20. 20

    The Morning star is run by shareholders.
    Why does a communist paper have shares?

  21. 21

    ..And sometimes not even then.

  22. 22
    jimmy says:

    Why is it everyone calls Guardian readers ‘bedwetters’? Or does that term also apply to just generally brain-dead trendy labour types? Or is it just Guardian readers?

  23. 23
    alex weir says:

    Solid evidence

  24. 24
    keredybretsa says:

    But there ain’t no dosh left for Josh.

  25. 25
    Turgle The Turtle says:

    They don’t live by the way it was written a few thousand years ago – idiot. Unlike their semitic neighbours, the understanding of “The King’s Torah” evolves and works within modern law, well mostly.

    I do know what I’m talking about… loads of examples where what was acceptable then, back in the day, when it was written, do not hold now, and no one disagrees, not even the most orthodox nutters.

  26. 26
    Carlos says:

    Personally, I always carry plenty of toilet paper with me.

  27. 27
    Pauli says:

    They get no benefit from reading the Guardian.

  28. 28
    JH says:

    My god, the shit bedwetters will try on.

    The Guardian didn’t ‘correct a mistake’, they AMENDED a release to make it sound like they don’t have a Zio-fucktard zealot on their editorial team.

  29. 29

    I’m also ““cool” with the idea of the IDF shooting American citizens on a flotilla bound for Gaza”
    Blockade runners should accept the risk inherent when attempting to resupply the terrorists in Gaza.
    I’m not cool with the Guardian though.

  30. 30
    Pissed off from Fishtoft says:

    “they AMENDED a release to make it sound like they don’t have a Zio-fucktard zealot on their editorial team.”

    As opposed to the actual editor.

  31. 31
    francois says:

    No not just graun readers, also brain dead commenters on blogs

  32. 32
    francois says:

    As in the solids floating in your toilet?

Media Reader

Newspapers No Longer Willing to Toe Party Line | Roy Greenslade
London Live to Cut 20 Staff to Buy in More Content | Press Gazette
Telegraph Revealed Auschwitz 3 Years Before Liberation | Telegraph
Mirror Hacking: 50 Legal Action Claims | Press Gazette
45 Mirror Group Stories Linked to Phone-Hacking | Press Gazette
We Must Not Call Charlie Hebdo Killers ‘terrorists’ | Telegraph
Page 3 and the Art of the Self-Pity Statement | Guardian
Here is What a 7 Way Debate Sounds Like | BBC
Poll: Sun Readers Want Page 3 to Stay | Business Insider
The Sun: An Apology | Press Gazette
More Women Prosecuted For Telly Tax | Mail

Rising Stars
Find out more about PLMR AD-MS

Boris on British Jihadis. Apparently based on MI5 intel:

“If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn. They are literally w***ers. Severe onanists. They are tortured. They will be very badly adjusted in their relations with women, and that is a symptom of their feeling of being failures and that the world is against them. They are not making it with girls, and so they turn to other forms of spiritual comfort — which of course is no comfort.”

Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:


AddThis Feed Button

Guido Reads

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,717 other followers