+ + + Huhne Decision at 10am Tomorrow Morning + + +
The pre-announcement of an announcement does not bode too well…
Activists Should Ignore the Sneerers | Jacob Rees-Mogg
NHS Can Kill Tories | James Kirkup
Dave Lets Labour Take Credit For Gay Marriage | FT
UKIP Set to Out-Poll Tories | Telegraph
UKIP Spokesperson Slaps Down BBC | The Commentator
Tobin Distanced Himself From Robin Hood Tax Protesters | FT
Tories Must Move on From Gay Marriage | Ben Brogan
Has the Right Split Irrevocably? | Iain Martin
Dave’s Woes Stem From 2010 | Janan Ganesh
Cameron Has Trashed His Own Brand | Rachel Sylvester
Secret of Farage’s Success | Prospect
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Lord Tebbit has his say on ‘aggressive homosexuals’:
“Why shouldn’t a mother marry her daughter? Why shouldn’t two elderly sisters living together marry each other? I quite fancy my brother!”
Harold Macmillan says:
” Evans, dear boy, Evans “
Guilty if he announces he is to resign today
No further action, probably.
Another one kicked into the long grass.
Yep, it will ‘not be in the public interest’ or some such bollocks. Detestable man.
What a shame, Boo Hoo Boo Hoo (tears running down my eyes, Onion close to my nose)
I predict rising penis levels, Anal warming and wetter than average mattresses.
Huhne won’t resign – he’ll hang on by his fingertips until he’s kicked out.
insurficent evidence. you watch
Or…”Not in the public interest.”
It would be reasonable to think that if there were to be no prosecution for reasons of either “insufficient evidence” or “not in the public interest” this would not preclude Cameron and Clegg from looking at what CPS have and making a decision about his fitness for Public office. i will not holdmy breath though!
Insufficient. Twat.
“The pre-announcement of an announcement does not bode too well…”
Hedging your bets Guido?
Pre-announcements of announcements allow the government time to sort out what they are going to do.
Expect a lot of activity in Downing Street today, certainly a lot of ‘screened’ phone calls, messages etc.
Not sure who it does not bode well for? Any help?
I agree it doesn’t bode well . Not heard before of the CPS pre-announcing an announcement ! Who are they announcing to ? It is between Huhne and the Police rather than anyone else. Huhne will know already what will happen tomorrow.
PCS has also announced it will not answer any questions after the announcement – now that does not bode well either.
cf politicalbetting – I am inclined to think that pre-announcing it means that there will be no charge
Fire
Taxi for Huhne!
Prison van for Huhne, has a far nicer ring to it!
That they choose to make the announcement on a Friday at the end of the working week is significant.
Friday= establishment white wash
Begining of week= prosecution
I am a great believer that a man is innocent until proven guilty but in Chris Huhne’s case I will make an exception.
Not long now
Nope, my waters tell me I’m going to scrape through on points. Or should that be no points.
Can’t stand the suspense; off to bed now,take some sleeping pills & set the alarm clock for 09:30 tomorrow.
You mean 09:30 a.m. in the morning.
Bumper-sticker: “If you can’t read this, blame Tony Crosland and Shirley Williams”.
09.30 is 9.30am as any educated person is aware. Pillock.
Is that first or second breakfast ?
no; 0930 is 9.30am; 09.30 is a typo
Guido – “10am tomorrow morning”. Classic BBC tautology. 10 o’clock tomorrow morning, or alternatively 10am tomorrow, but not both.
Need some tags Neo Guido.
Huhne, crime must not pay , lib dems
Maybe his gulag can be errecting windmills
The wind is coming from his trousers
Strictly speaking it’s incontinence pants as he has an uncontrollable leak Response in government meetings .
Cant see them calling a presser to not press charges.
It will be so that we call all share and rejoice in the celebration of innocence
Not so sure… Keir Starmer may want to explain himself/cover his *** if the decision is not to charge.
This so- called”civil servant” has never been other than a Labour placeman. This govt should have eradicated him 18 months ago.
Isn’t Starmer a Common Purpose plant as well? If so there are thousands of them dotted around promoting the global marxism “fairness” message.
The “Insufficient Evidence” excuse the CPS often uses is a load of bollocks. There was a time when prosecution evidence was tested in court before magistrates or a judge and jury. The tossers at the CPS are such low grade lawyers they need the accused to have been caught red handed, on camera, preferably with fingerprint and DNA evidence, followed by a full and frank admission and positive identification from at least six witnesses. Even then, they’d bottle it if the accused indicated he/she would be pleading “not guilty”.
I’ve seen first hand good quality criminal cases dropped because the accused has become “difficult”. Whenever your hear the words ” the prosecution offered no evidence” when they get to court you just know the CPS lawyer has bottled out of a full trial. Many is the time a victim or witness who has been more than willing to attend court has been left in the dark because the CPS has quietly dropped a prosecution case.
R v Dobson and Norris?
Remember Stammer originally called a press conference to explain why they wouldn’t be chaging anyone with the death of Ian Tomlison.
Debatable. The CPS finally got their act together very rapidly once the emails were with them, so let’s hope this is the final piece of the jigsaw. Alternatively, of course, this is as suggested merely an arse-covering exercise. Besides, why call a press conference to announce a charge (or charges)? Theoretically it should be very brief, so why drag everyone there – unless the socialist Starmer wants to revel in yet more publicity. After all, he is quite a self-regarding twat and always relishes getting his name in the papers.
I can feel a vacancy coming up in the Cabinet in the next day or so!
I certainly hope you are correct, not holding my breath on this one.
If it had been a Tory he would already be sitting in the Clink !
Problem is, the coalition agreement means that Lib-dems have to be replaced by other lib dems.
This means that the useless human-hating green fascist Hughne will have to be replaced by another useless human-hating green fascist.
We will not see sanity in our energy policy for many years yet.
Handycock for Energy Minister – he’s got the stamina.
Why not simply dissolve this useless and unwanted portfolio?
>I can feel a vacancy coming up in the Cabinet in the next day or so!
Nothing like a good shit when you’ve been constipated. Let’s hope Starmer pulls the chain and opens the window.
Have sent a copy of ‘Bitching for Dummies’.
champagne on ice … breath baited … poised to party
Even if he is to be charged , Huhne is still innocent until proven guilty by the court !
if he’s charged then the evidence is deemed to be enough to get a conviction. you cant predict how a jury will jump but someone as self obsessed as the great man will offend/shoot his mouth off if put in the dock.
If he is not charged can somebody bring private prosecution?
Shame that he cant save face by claiming to resign to spend more time with his wife and family
***APPLAUSE!!***
Comment of the day. Nay, year. V funny.
Definitely comment of the day.
Kick the conniving little shit out for Christ’s sake.
He’s up there with Simon Hughes in the self-importance-sans-merit league.
Hughes though loathesome in his own right, is an amateur compared to Huhne, who would casually stab you in the back and then posture as if aghast at your bleeding.
Huhne really is one of most slimy and odious of the yellow-bellies – and that’s in the face of some world class competition.
THE TARGET IS BACK!!! YAY!!!
Apparently he’s advertising for a researcher to help with the writing of a book.
Maybe he knows something we don’t.
Nell,I hear the book title has provisionally been suggested as “The Dummies guide to Breaking the Law with impunity”.
Or ‘Point-Dodging for Dummies’ perhaps.
McShane next.
So many to chose from. The list of dishonest talentless parasites residing in the HoC and HoL is endless.
1,500 of them, roughly.
And who’s going to replace him if he goes? Not DavidLaws I hope.
Me.
Incoming!
Time for a snap election because the coalition cannot take any more Lib Dem Lies, we need a chance to weed these pork pie merchants out of government for good.
Coincidentally general debate on transparency in sentencing taking place
in HOC right now. I wonder if Huhne will make a contribution.
Keith Vaz just spoke and it’s plain he has fallen deeply and passionately
in love with himself and is obviously an expert in self-love.
Unctuous oily oleaginous slimy boule de suif.
He needs a stick of suif stuck up his fundament.
So tomorrow’s choice of lynching is Huhne or Starmer and Huhne…
I think they should be made to stay in the same cell. After all it was a joint venture.
Any bookies out there giving odds on Huhne being prosecuted. Bookies are usually a good indicator.
This is probably appropriate for the LibDems:
Taxi for Huhne!
Huhne and Redknapp together now there’s the stuff things are made of
Left half and inside right?
or left half and inside, right?
There is no chance whatsoever of that arse Huhne being charged. One rule for them and another for the rest of us.
You never know, they may let one “commoner” go to keep the scent off of all the criminal lords, still lording it over us!
CPS = Confirming Public Suspicions
of being
Corrupt Political Shysters
(I’m too polite to say what I really think of them)
Not a cat in hell’s chance of Mr Huhne being charged or having to resign….it will be announced that due to the largely speculative ruminations of the press and blogosphere that it would simply be impossible for Mr Huhne to receive a fair hearing and with that and taking everything into account on the balnce of probability etc etc…it would not be in the public interest to pursue this matter…….
Sounds like a reasonable hypothesis to me!
Going, Going, Going, poof, gone!
That was David Laws surely……
Jury is still out on the Huhne.
One step at a time, hopefuly charged and jailed, next for useage of the Huhne word to pass into the Oxford Dictionary eventually, as a generally accepted substitute for C.unt.
BBC has ‘decision then to be explained on camera.’
You wouldn’t need to explain anything on camera if it were going to trial.
He’s off the hook, I bet.
completely wrong.
And contented to be so.
At this point you can be sure Carina Tringham will be breaking out the leather flogger and the extra double wide strapon. Huhne is going to need all the breaking in he can take if his visit to Wormwood scrubs is to be bearable.
According to that slap head Nick Robinson,
“I’ve just been checking the precedents for the CPS announcing in advance that they are making an on-camera statement and for the DPP himself delivering it.
The Crown Prosecution Service did make an on camera statement when they decided not to bring prosecutions in the cash for honours. It was, though, not the Director of Public Prosecutions himself who made the announcement. The news emerged the day before – I reported the fact that there would not be prosecutions the day before on the BBC News at Ten and on my blog.
The last time the DPP made an on-camera statement was when manslaughter charges were brought against a police officer over the death of Ian Tomlinson last May. He also made the announcements on the decisions relating to the MPs’ expenses scandal”
Fingers crossed then.
Sadly – not a chance. Many have forgotten the basic rule of the HoC:
“One rule for the plebs – a very different one for us” followed by:
“(subsidised) teabreak over, snouts back in the trough”
Here’s a summary of what Starmer will say : Too long ago, not possible to charge him and not Pryce as well and the poor cow has suffered enough, fancy being replaced by an ugly lesbian, had it not been for the divorce nothing would have happened, no one would have been any wiser, they were both very naughty but unlikely to do it again, a fair trial would now be virtually impossible, etc.,etc.,etc., ad infinitum.
Hate to say it, especially as Huhne is a disgusting human being, but that sounds absolutely right. But miracles do happen so I live in hope.
Nevertheless, even if he escapes prosecution the ‘points swap’ will remain up there with Peter Vain’s (alleged) bank robbery. In other words, we all know he did it but the authorities lack the balls to see it through.
So If Huhne is off the hook [To Be Confirmed] does this mean that his ex was lying and will be prosecuted for wasting police time?
Or is this all too embarrassing and we will be told to forget about the whole matter?
Parasiticians – dontcha just love ‘em.
Hang ‘em all and let God sort them out.
I don’t exist.
Just because he isn’t charged it doesn’t make him not guilty…
Not exactly “innocent until proven guilty”. But I like the sound of it and maybe its time to change things a bit
With our politicised police force if Huhne was going to be prosecuted he would have been arrested and charged by now. He’s off the hook.
Hope I’m wrong but I don’t think I am.
If it has taken so long to decide whether or not the evidence was sufficient to obtain a conviction then that very uncertainty is a demonstration that it should have been for a jury to come to that decision and not Huhne’s fellow leftie, Starmer.
It will be an “insufficient evidence” whitewash and one more reason for the rest of us to loathe and despise all the London bastards.
Lock the fucking bastard tvvat up !
ONE RULE FOR US SAME RULE FOR THEM !!
Oh God. He’s going to walk, isn’t he?
The Press conference is to explain why they aren’t prosecuting.
The police don’t hold press conferences to announce they are GOING to arrest someone. They turn up at 3 in the morning and snap the cuffs on. Look what they did with CAsh for honours.
I can’t bear the thought of the toad and his shit-eating grin if he gets off.
CPS record on prosecuting politicians is abysmal. Begs the question ‘who regulates the regulators?’.
Shouldn’t Leveson be examining the role of the CPS as part of his inquiry?
Yep, I said long ago that they will find a way not to prosecute this smarmy twat. They don’t announce in advance other than to prepare for the ineviable – not in the public interest to prosecute! Also Starmer will not be answering any questions after the statement. Once again a politician has got away with it because of Starmer who is himself a twat of the lowest order. What is interesting though is if any charges against his ex-wife are brought because if he is not to be prosecuted surely she would have been trying to pervert the course of justice.
I’m surprised anyone thinks someone like Starmer will decide to press charges against someone like Huhne. If it was a Tory Minister, they’d be in the dock double sharpish.
I just love the smell of toast in the morning…
Dave says he has every confidence in Hulne, and there is a pre-announcement that there will be an announcement. Does this mean he is getting off?
C’mon Keir you punk….show you have some balls and make my day tomorrow.
And please remind the trial judge that the maximum sentence is life imprisonment.
If the bastard does get off, will anybody ever treat him with any respect again?
We need a strong and determined Energy Minister who can undo all the harm and nonsense that Huhne and Milliband the Younger have done.
Wind power currently generating less than 1% of the country’s energy needs
Demand = 47600 MW
Wind production = 455 MW
See http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ for latest snapshot and
http://www.bmreports.com/bsp/bsp_home.htm
for longer term stats.
And pray/hope/sacrifice a goat/ that Huhne leaves power today
if he gets off then every member of the public who gets a speeding fine should clog the system by making up pathetic excuses.
Then the CPS would really have their hands full
Yep, the bastard will be free to carry on erecting windmills on concrete plinths in the most beautiful parts of Britain for a bit longer.
At least we won’t have to watch Huhne on the telly when our generating capacity falls well below the level of demand and the lights go out, thanks to his insane energy policies. So it’s not all doom and gloom.
For the benefit of those who haven’t seen this weeks Eye:
http://private-eye.co.uk/pictures/covers/full/1306_big.jpg
Watch the Establishment close ranks against the Little People…
Starmer is a socialist twat. What chance for justice.Huhne will be cleared but there will be a PRYCE to be paid. HA.HA.HA.
Were Huhne to escape, it is hard to envidage how anybody could ever have faith in the CPS again. Justice must be done, and it must be seen to be done.
this is cameron’s britain, my friend
As OH puts it – one of him, 60 million of us…
Since the press conference is to both ‘announce’ the decision and apparently ‘explain’ it a pound to a penny no charges will be brought because if charges were being brought then the CPS wouldn’t ‘explain’ their decision for fear of jeopardising the fairness of the subsequent trial by their explanation.
It’ll be ‘no charges’ and an explanation of why it took them so long to come to the decision, probably with a ‘charges would not be in the public interest’ thrown in somewhere for good measure.
I am part of the Establishment. I will never be put on trial.
Now you pleb bastards can pay energy higher taxes while we exempt ourselves from them.
I fancy a new Jaguar.
this shitty government will never toss away one of their own. rest assured Huhne will stil be in a job tomorrow. This governemtn only shits on the vulnerable
Has the UK government become one of the most corrupt in the world? I think so, and I’ve seen a few.
The more blatant the lies, the more they laught at the voting public.
They’ll get caught rigging the ballot boxes next I suppose.
If he hasn’t quit by the ten oclock news tonight then it will be business as usual in the morning.
Rigging the ballot boxes – Glenrothes 2009 by election marked register “lost”.
More postal votes!
Guido’s predicted he’ll be charged so obviously it’s NFA.
Sadly, I reckon I agree with the comments above that see the lying weasel getting away with it. Any CPS “explanation” *has* to be about why they *aren’t* charging him… any CPS statement that came after they’ve announced that they *were* charging would surely be viewed as predjudicial.
It is irritating, because everyone (plus wives) realises that Mr Joseph Bloggs, in the same situation, would already be standing before m’luds.
But there could be a warning to the Press not to prejudice the forthcoming trial with speculation and assorted Liddlery about the popular statesman. Otherwise the Attorney General will get angry.
Correction Mr Joseph Bloggs would have already stood before MLuds and would currently be in prison.
Plus, of course, he actually IS guilty. As I happen to know.
Mr.Joseph Bloggs would already be bending over for Big Bubba.
Starmer is so scared of the press huhne will definitely be prosecuted. Starmer cacked himself over the backlash after not prosecuting the police officer over the death of Tomlinson, he did a complete U-turn; he names and shames his own lawyers in the press if they make a mistake, so expect Huhne and his ex missus to face charges.
If only…
Bet you a bottle of Top Totty that the yellow slime lives to trough another day.
So, you owe me a bottle ot Top Totty then! Told ya so!
CH will definitely resign if charged.
lets face it anybody else out here in the real world would have been sentenced served the time and now be walking the streets looking to find one of the half million jobs out there.obviousl if white british they would have blacked up before hand to have a sporting chance.
No charge, end of.
The Ghost of Cyril Smith flits softly through my room,
“I nivver liked that slippery bastard ‘uhne.
Oaten were bad enough, the dirty bleeder.
‘oo’d ‘a’ thought ‘e’d be a bottom feeder.”
Keir Starmer
Is a harmer
Of English Karma
He should be a farmer
With a llama
In western Palma.
Vibes that the DPP will ‘explain his decision’ today – that must mean no prosecution. They have let the bugger off