May 9th, 2009

Police Investigating McNulty

Police have been asked by a member of the public to investigate a claim that Tony McNulty may have ‘obtained pecuniary advantage by deception’. What would Father Dominic say McNulty?

Video credit : Tory Politico


491 Comments

  1. 1
    Ambrose Rice Pudding says:

    Can’t wait for all this foaming at the mouth to reach its conclusion so that we can all concentrate on attacking the government for being, well, shit at being in government.

    • 36
      Bordeaux Binger says:

      HM QE2 could, of course, increase her popularity by just dissolving Parliament it is about the only power she has left. Her representative, John Kerr, did just that in Australia.

      • 38
        Gordon Brown says:

        It started in America…

      • 58

        While this story is the talking point of the day down here in Brisbane, there isn’t even a single mention on the BBC’s international webpage – until you dig. Then Nick Robinson decides that this isn’t a big story at all – ‘small beer’ he calls it.

        The question should be ‘ who’ll be the first against the wall now that the revolution is here?’

        You couldn’t make it up.

      • 147
        Doctor Mick says:

        We’ll be transporting a boatload of crims down to Oz soon. No wonder you’re all talking a bout it. ;)

      • 342
        Gordon Brown's Nokia (Ouch!) says:

        No it started in thew HoC

    • 117
      Swiss Bob says:

      By the looks of it some of them won’t be in Govt, they’ll be in prison.

      • 327
        Anonymous says:

        Really? Honestly, what do you think the chances of that happening are?

    • 239

      Just rename “Her Majesty’s Palace, Westminster” to “HM Prison Westminster”.

    • 273
      Anonymous says:

      It would have all been more tolerable if it wasn’t such a shit treacherous government.

    • 307
      semo says:

      GUIDO,
      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE START A CAMPAIGN TO MARCH ON PARLIAMENT IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE.EVEN IF IT WAS A CROSS PARTY MARCH. WE NEED TO DEFEND OUR DEMOCRACY AGAINST THESE FRAUDSTERS
      PLEASE I BEG YOU GUIDO.
      SEMO

    • 317
      cynic says:

      The solution is the ballot box not the courts.

      In all the cases of fraud we need people to run in that constituency on an anti fraud platform at the next election to give voters the chance to register a protest vote against the sitting MP without necessarily supporting an opposition party whom they wouldn’t vote for.

      This might be suitably targeted in each case eg an anti porn campaign in Jacqui Smith’s case or just a don’t vote for corruption, spoil your ballot in others.

      Most of these candidates will not win but they may so undermine the sitting MP as to get them out and scare the shit out of the corrupt, lying dishonest rabble and now infest Parliament.

      • 390
        Broom and Dust says:

        The solution is JAIL. That’s where fraudsters belong.

        Its not just the petty thievery worth millions the Ikea-carrybag hooners are indulging in, its the multi-billions Bliar and McRuin and the 16-home-flipper Darling minion have bequeathed the next three parliaments that merit a dungeon each in the Tower.

      • 420
        Fausty says:

        We need both. Brown and his merry band of thieves are not going to investigate their own.

        1) Tories stand on their anti-fraud platform and see of the incumbent;
        2) Tories in office initiate police investigations into all Labour criminal activity, including the Iraq war.

        Labour should be ground into dust – crushed totally.

        http://faustiesblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/crush-your-enemy-totally.html

      • 430
        Bordeaux Binger says:

        Hmm. This tactic might just succeed in splitting the votes against the sitting sleazebag and allow him/her/it back for another fraud fest.

    • 441
      Auntie Flo' says:

      Sh*t at government they are alright, but they are obviously sh*t hot at thieving from the public purse.

      Lovely video, Guido!

  2. 2

    And what about the rest of these muthas?

    • 37
      Eric Cantona says:

      Quite so.

      Especially that greasy, corrupt snake Keith Vaz who it seems has been caught out trousering thousands of GBP for a “second home” i.e. an expensive flat just 12 miles from his main home – a 1.2 Million GBP residence in London, which is located close to Westminster. Vaz also has another house at his constituency in Leicester, for which he has also claimed second home allowance by switching.

      I’ve always thought that Vaz was a sly bastard with his nose permanently in the trough. He deserves the same kind of police investigation as McNulty.

    • 52
      Carnot says:

      McNulty and Vaz greed comes as no surprise. Both are arrogant pigs.

      For those on suicide watch my advice would be take a short walk from Parliament across Westminster bridge and

      JUMP

      you scumbags.

      • 86
        Awaiting Moderation says:

        Yes, please, a mass suicide of Labour troughers over Westminster Bridge.

        “Dull would he be of soul who could pass by
        A sight so touching in its majesty.”

      • 113
        nell says:

        We don’t want to pollute the Thames with this trash.

      • 142
        Basil Jones says:

        From the Great Stink of 1858 to the Great Sink of 2009 – nothing really changes much.

      • 157
        Engineer says:

        If some of these sleazebags fell down a conveniently opened manhole just outside Parliament, would that count as sewercide?

      • 229
        Indigo says:

        A rush by the elected Gadarene swine (“for we are Legion”) de nos jours. I’d pay to watch that.

      • 251
        Anonymous says:

        If one of the sleazebags fell down a “manhole” just outside Parliament it would mean they had been walking over Phil Woolas by mistake.

  3. 3
    It doesn't add up... says:

    Let us not be deceived by the throwing of a lamb to the wolves

    • 179
      Dr Nuts says:

      If these are the lambs – by God, the sheep are going to be bad.

      Let the wolves have ‘em!

  4. 4
    bergen says:

    It’s an odd thought that HMG may have been taken over by a criminal gang.We mock East European”Mafia” states but are we any better now?

    One group that I suspect may be totally demoralised are the constituency party activists.Whatever their politics they try to keep the democratic process going.They must feel incredibly let down by these pirates.

    • 19
      Technomist says:

      Many of them were either muscled out of the way by greedier people or gave up in disgust years ago. The Labour Party where I live has to pay to deliver its glossy leaflets: the party has collapsed even though the MP is actually quite well liked personally and commutes into Westminster on the underground. He is retiring, expected to be replaced in his hitherto safe seat by a policy drone.

      What is not coming out of all this in the national press is an understanding that the fish has been rotting from the head for years. Many local Councillors have the same parasitic attitudes these days as well.

      I would bet that many ex-Labour party members are disgusted but not really that suprised by what has been going on. Hence the schadenfreude.

      • 32
        Dick the Prick says:

        The wolves are hungry though. Thinking about the phrase ‘there’s no prude like a reformed whore’ – you can’t lecture folk with bullshit – it has to be facts & interesting. These conceited bunch are having a laugh – not one of them is doing a proper audit – first fucking job you do. Hey ho – I want scalps.

      • 359
        Cherie Booth-Blair says:

        We need Georgia Gould in Labour!

      • 391
        Broom and Dust (gurning, mewling and puking on the way to school) says:

        348 – and we’re going to get an 18-year-old Bennite as well, the infantilisation of the nation is complete, well done the psychologically flawed snoteater.

    • 51
      Anon77 says:

      What we have is serious organised crime at Westminster.

      What we need is to do the same as the Italians had to do with the Mafia. A dedicated police team, an independent and hard nosed prosecutor, and a judge or judges that has not been bought.

    • 56
      Anon77 says:

      What we have is serious organised crime at Westminster.

      What we need is to do the same as the Italians had to do with the Mafia. A dedicated police team, an independent and hard nosed prosecutor, and a judge or judges that have not been bought.

      As for arresting the person or persons who put the criminal information into the public domain, I would urge the police not to do it.

      There is such fury among the public that such a disgraceful act has the potential to provoke widespread public disorder

      • 81
        Gendeau says:

        Let’s have Elisabeth Filkin back.

        Give her carte blanch to go where the money has gone.

        Her own prosecutors (no CPS manipulation).

      • 96
        Anon77 says:

        Sorry for the repetition, my computer has a stutter.

        The problem now is that our Government is regarded with the same derision and contempt abroad as it is at home.

        What can be done about it?

      • 146
        Dick the Prick says:

        Anon77 – quite provocative language in an election year – we don’t ‘need’ to do shit. It’s what you do that counts. Lifetime of struggle for glimpses of glory. Fuck this ethic and fuck this cabal – i’ll do it as hobby.

      • 489
        Force them out! says:

        Let them arrest the leaker. Let them call for his or her liberty, then let them feel the publics’ wrath!

    • 277
      Anonymous says:

      Yes indeed. Imagine being asked to pay your subs and deliver leaflets in order to keep these shits at the trough!

  5. 5
    Linky says:

    When he starts bitching, can we say “It’s all with in the rules.” :)

  6. 6
    Technomist says:

    Who is “A spokesman for McNulty?”

  7. 7
    Jonathan Cook says:

    You are going down McNulty:

    “7. There are two basic requirements which must be met before any of the three limbs of the new offence can be charged. First, the behaviour of the defendant must be dishonest.[2] Second it must also be his intention to make a gain, or cause a loss to another.[3] However, there will no longer be any need to prove that a gain or loss has been made, or that any victim was deceived by the defendant’s behaviour. Each of the three limbs of the offence carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.

    8. Section 2 makes it an offence to commit fraud by false representation in any form. For a representation to be false, the representation being made must be wrong or misleading, and the person making it must know that it is, or might be, wrong or misleading.”

    http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/publications/home-office-circulars/circulars-2006/042-2006/

    • 18
      Bill d'Sarse says:

      Jonathon, the problem with that is, well, erm, that’s the rules for us plebs. We all know it’s a different kettle of fish for the current administration. Stand by for:

      ‘Insufficient evidence of wrongdoing.’
      ‘Not in the Public interest.’
      ‘It was within the rules but perhaps not within the spirit.’
      ‘Administrative error.’

      • 92
        claire rand says:

        while for anyone outside the ‘club’ the rule is “no ifs, no buts”, “ignorance of the law is no excuse”.

        unless of course your BT in which case its “no criminal intent”

        money talks, as always

      • 200
        R.McGeddon says:

        What about the J.Straw defence – ‘Accountancy is not my strongest suit ‘.
        I think that’s an absolute bareface classic.

      • 371
        Eric says:

        The BBC had a tax expert explaining on Saturday morning that MPs’ expenses are already in a special class – ‘exempt expenses’, if I heard him correctly.
        Unlike the rest of us* they do not have to show that the expenses they claimed are necessary to do their job.
        I wonder who legislated for that exemption.

        To my surprise, they also broadcast a commentator describing MPs as participating jointly in a criminal conspiracy. If even Auntie admits it, things are getting bad.


        *Apart from ministers of religion, he said. Presumably their purchases of sweets for choirboys are automatically deemed OK.

      • 394
        Broom and Dust says:

        ….and of course parliamentary privilege

      • 423
        Cicero says:

        @ Eric:

        Interestingly, the legal term for participating jointly in a criminal conspiracy is having a “Common Purpose.”
        Hmmmm…

      • 442
        The Managment says:

        or “what fraud”

    • 108
      NotaSheep says:

      Unfortunately, I have the utmost faith that either the police or the CPS will declare that “a prosecution would not be in the public interest” or that there is “insufficient evidence to prosecute”. The system works against the public and in favour of the ruling party; we, the people, deserve better.

      • 180
        Clerk to His Honour the Chief Justice of the Court of Public Opinion says:

        Due to tremendous public demand “His Lordship” has asked me to advise you that he has decided to reconvene the Court to sit in “Special Session” to hear evidence before delivering his judgment. He is of course related distantly to those eminent lawyers who so ably conducted the prosecution at Nuremburg and can be relied upon to deliver the just sentence once the jurors have deliberated and delivered their verdict although he feels he should indicate that he is not disposed to exercise Mercy if the defendant(s) are found guilty but alas Mr Pierrepoint is no longer with us so we may have to settle for “Community Service” with the obligatory orange vest marked “Thieving Hoon” in black on the reverse !

      • 248
        Rick says:

        “……..we, the people, deserve better.”

        Maybe we have got what we deserve.

  8. 8
    President Mugabe says:

    Good to see you’re UK ruling class are following my fine example. Hyperinflation soon and widespread corruption in your ruling elite. Keep up the good work Gordon. Next stage is for you to start murdering the opposition

  9. 9
    Inspector Knacker of the Yard says:

    I wonder how many Dishonourable Members of the House of Common Criminals are now on suicide watch?

    All of them, I hope.

    What makes the whole scandal reek even more is the fact that on the very same day it was announced that child poverty in the UK was at it’s worse since the 1960s.

  10. 10
    Doctor Mick says:

    It must be quite Harrowing for the poor fellow.

    • 392
      Dr Nuts says:

      Nope not nearly enough – when he’s dangling off a lamp-post will come close.

  11. 11
    Toulouse LaPrescott says:

    Hear Hear.

    More power to my elbow which appears to be stuck in the s-bend.

  12. 12
    Urinalpeeps says:

    Ahhhhhhhh!
    I do love the split splat sound of the shit hitting the fan in the morning!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Rumour has it he also hits the phone,wall and printer!!!!!!!!!!

  13. 13
    Taxfodder says:

    Its all in the DATABASE!

    haha.

    • 63
      eye-eye says:

      it’s hard to read between the lines because you don’t have any. say a bit more if you are in the know

  14. 14
    Spin Doctor says:

    This current NeuLabour trousering makes the so-called Tory sleaze years under John Major look quaintly inept in comparison.

    • 27
      Urinalpeeps says:

      Spin Doctor

      Sobering thought for you.
      What we are experiencing now ,will,in a few short years be:

      “The good old days”

      It is only by the efforts of people like “Guido” and our support of them and our constant vigilance that we can look back and say that we are progressing.

    • 98
      Sir Reginald Titbrain says:

      Yes I hear the Hamiltons are worried about their celebrity status now they have been exposed as penny ante rank amateurs.

      • 199
        Dr Nuts says:

        Oh no, that’s not true – they have the peculiar advantage of being tried in court about Brown bags.

        Not like this mob who’ve swag-bagged under Brown!

  15. 15
    Anonymous says:

    You know, you’ve just got to hand it to Blair.

    He milked the system for all it was worth, he stitched the country up big time, he took cash for honours, he lied like a trooper and allowed parliament to degenerate into a cesspit of corruption.

    But he got out before the shit hit the fan, no one yet no one is feeling his collar and that deserves respect.

    • 24
      resurgemus says:

      What do you expect, he’s a lawyer – articulate guano

      • 34
        Fantasist says:

        There are some things that having a legal privileged wife can get a prime minister that even MPs who are lawyers can’t get.

      • 44
        Doctor Mick says:

        Yeah, but to have to wake up to that face every morning. I think I’d prefer the Scrubs.

      • 91
        flacid says:

        I couldn’t bring myself to even admit that I’d even shagged that whilst pissed let alone marry it of my own volition. Even worse to impregnate it for the benefit of public opinion whilst fisting the country is the mark of a true professional; someone who goes through and beyond what could be reasonably asked of a human being for the good of his own pocket. The very thought gives me a terminal floppy…

      • 292
        Heads on poles says:

        Flacid – you owe me one new keyboard, this one is now covered in coffee.
        Thank you.

    • 188
      It all started in America you bastards!!!!! says:

      What did you expect? Bliar is a jock twat and jock twats have been fucking up the Country for 12 years.

    • 490
      Force them out! says:

      I want to see Phony B’liars’ expense receipts. Anyone got them?

  16. 16
    Wossat? says:

    Why wait for the police to fcuk up or otherwise muddy the waters and make any charges meaningless? Turn the thieving scum into lampost ornaments ASAP. It’s the only language they’ll ever understand.

  17. 17
    Plato says:

    Great mash-up.

    I wonder what tomorrow will bring? Rumours are that the Tories are up on Monday so the Sunday edition must be a corker.

    The Times are in real sour grapes mode and holding their nose about ‘cheque-book’ journalism. Silly them for not publishing.

    The one person who appears to have got away with it so far is one Tony Blair – old Teflon just shredded his ‘by accident’ when he doubled his expense claims

  18. 20
    Leggy Shrub says:

    McShifty, Udders Uddin, Jacquboot, Meddlesome of Boy – top four for pruning. Where’s me secateurs? I’ll personally hand down some fine-scale habitat management, long overdue.

    • 116
      ed bollox says:

      Uddin gets a sort of triple protection due to her ethnicity, religious beliefs, sex and being a member of the party…erh sorry that’s four. Anyway being a Muslim shouldn’t she be distancing herself from the pigs with snouts in the trough? Obviously greed takes precedence over belief when it’s such a lucrative trough to feed from.

  19. 21
    Anonymous says:

    I;ve seen it all now. Some Labour MP bint just came on Sky and said her £250 m for a new bog seat was frugal. you are Wrong love, a bog seat from the pound shop for £1 is being frugal, a bog seat for £250 is taking the piss out of the taxpayer and I suspect is most probably criminal fraud.

    • 39
      Hermione Mindebum says:

      why would they need bog seats. the only shit that comes from them is through their lying mouths!

    • 41
      Pound Shop Bog Seat says:

      Why oh why will no New Labour MP buy me? Do they not want to plant their fat arses on my (admittedly non-luxurious) melamine-shrouded chipboard and dump a load through my adequately sized posterior aperture? Why am I always losing out to John Lewis? What makes their butt-cutout any better?

      • 110
        John Prescott says:

        I’ve broken more bog seats than I’ve had hot dinners.

        Well … actually … on second thoughts, it’s about the same.

      • 254

        John Prescott: “I couldn’t give 2 shits about the public, and I have the seats to prove it!”

      • 477
        John Prescnut says:

        Have you seen my arse? To be honest, I’ve not seen my feet for 20 years. This is all water down the pan to me. I’m getting out of politics now that my constituency has turned down my lad as a replacement. Made my stash and ‘er indoors can have her hair done twice a week. Thank you very much. Gullible bloody voters the lot of you. Feck off.

    • 153
      Anonymous says:

      Just read the court reports in any local paper up and down the country to see what happens to the “little people” who are found to have stolen or defrauded anything of such a frugal value !

    • 271
      Indigo says:

      “frugal ” – Nicolae (solid gold bath fittings) Ceauşescu told me so.

    • 448
      The Managment says:

      I wonder how this lot will cope in the real world when they get kicked out of Parliament Can you imagine it – Shopping “Gawd darlink that toilet seat’s ONLY 20 quid are you sure what’s wrong with it cos that’s sooooo cheap “

    • 491

      what is it with all the toilet seats?

  20. 22
    swindled says:

    Please do not forget that Brown in his first budget
    gave a 75pence rise to OAPs. The greedy load of gits

    • 26
      bentkopper says:

      What the OAP’s?

      • 49
        Very Old Man says:

        … the relative pronoun should refer back to the antecedent. Sigh, the things you were taught back in the 50s.

      • 243
        Romanian immigrant says:

        I have never claimed benefits in my life and you sound like a right Huhne.

      • 267
        Anonymous says:

        No, you had a Romanian Community Outreach Worker claim them for you!

    • 446
      sick as a parrot says:

      Paid for out of the shagging he gave people saving into pension plans by removing dividend tax relief—the very first thing he did in 1997 the snivelling devious bastard.

  21. 23
    bentkopper says:

    Kit Kat from the mini bar on expenses, caught in the act, they are all nothing but amateur shoplifters………what a wholly pathetic lot.

    • 60
      Anonymous says:

      To be fair to Hazel she was feeling lonely in her hotel room.

      The three Kit kat chunkies melted very quickly & they didn’t have any fun size Mars bars left in the mini fridge.

    • 240
      An ordinary voter says:

      Note the Communities Secretary(well until 5 June ) – There is a perfectly good Travel Lodge at the “old” County Hall building – £59.95 a night AND it’s a two minute walk from House of Commons(where there is a subsidised “Restaurant if you do not wish to avail yourself of the £4.95 Breakfast on offer at Travel Lodge!) So why stay at “Zetters” which is further out and charges £200 per room per night ?

  22. 25
    Stu says:

    Excellent hope the scumbag goes down and rots in jail

    • 219
      matthew lowe says:

      Thinking hypothetically, if the whole greedy lot of the thieving gits went to gaol, would they get the OAP not paying her council tax on time tariff (the maximum) or the serial burglar tariff (comunity service)?
      Interestingly, during a recent court martial held in Portsmouth several junior service persons were convicted of making fraudulent claims and punished accordingly; I wonder if any tried the clerical error, within the rules but not the spirit, or it’s now been repaid (bugger I’ve been caught) lines of defence?

    • 234
      Anonymous says:

      Thinking hypothetically, if the whole greedy lot of the thieving gits went to gaol, would they get the OAP not paying her council tax on time tariff (the maximum) or the serial burglar tariff (community service)?

  23. 30
    Anonymous says:

    “It’s all within the rules”

    Didn’t Hitler’s supporters say something similar at Nuremberg?

  24. 31
    Anonymous says:

    This morning’s Times editorial says that it’s “simply untrue” that MPs “have established for themselves a remarkable package with rules that allow them to line their pockets at public expense. ”

    The Times also appears to think that it’s the press’s fault for printing the claims, and the hypocritical taxpayers’ fault for being outraged at discovering the secret behaviour of their elected representatives.

    I wonder which Government apparatchik drafted this stuff for them to print?

    • 42
      Adult Babies Romper Room says:

      Bnndsh Uunffd Oikslk MMMMnsss

    • 102
      claire rand says:

      probably just miffed they haven’t got the details first.

      this uncensored stuff on wikileaks yet?

  25. 33
    Shithead says:

    Just for the record, I talked to an old workmate of Two Arse-Holes Prescott this week and the Fat Ignorant Bastard was a cleaner in the ferry galleys. Wearing rubber boots and oilskins to protect him from the shite, he cleaned the massive cooking utensils and soup tureens. The creativity over his cv came much later, when he was being groomed for politics. The workmate had no recollection of him ever doing service as a steward.

    • 308
      Sloberdown Menob says:

      Even a steward was known as a piss pot handler and was considered one of the lowest ranks in the merchant navy, they were paid a pittance and were expected to suck hole passengers to earn a crust, most of them were golden rivet spotting extrovert raving benders as well.

    • 329
      Lord Top Spinner (again!) says:

      So that’s why he served me gin without the tonic…untrained bastard…

      But now he sings…

      The working class may kiss my arse
      I’ve got ,the foreman job at least

      to the tune of the Communist International…

      • 416
        Sloberdown Menob says:

        They all had visions of grandeur.
        They would mix with the rich cruise passengers while on duty but be banned from passenger decks when not, they also had to sleep in bunks of up to six to a small cabin below sea level and with very little ventilation.
        We were under strict instructions to wheel key and drop over the side any of the morons we caught anywhere near the engine or boiler room.
        The engine room crew out of the kindness of their hearts once tried to teach a few of them to swim while we were anchored off one of the Fiji islands by putting a rope around their waists.
        (Fuckers didn’t even make good shark bait!}
        The seamen’s mission is full of the lonely deluded wankers with visions of grandeur who only got to see the good life from the sidelines.

  26. 35
    Gordon's Coffin says:

    How far can you trust the Telegrapah these days? Plenty of people think Za-nu-Lab has it’s greasy tentacles in their somewhere? Drinking buddies of McBride etc etc etc etc

  27. 43
    Technomist says:

    55,280 signatures this morning

    If he quits, does he get a pension? What happens if he’s simply impeached?

    http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/

    • 72
      Don King says:

      If he has a STROKE and dies… do we have to still pay the koonts pension to that FAG-HOUND of a bitch whore wife of his ?

    • 228
      Anonymous says:

      Another 4000 and it’ll have double the support of the next most popular petition.

    • 478
      Fingers O'Leary says:

      He’d enjoy picking up the dropped bar of soap in the jail shower.

  28. 45
    Animal Farm Nulab my arse says:

    Guido
    When do we let the dogs off the leash on Euro expenses. Timing must be soon with the Euro elections.
    The current UK stuff is merely a drop in the ocean compared to that story. Clearly we should limit expenses to a set amount until under proven control. Quite happy to stop the gravy train going to Strasburg on a mega fest once a month.

    • 71
      Old Tory says:

      Just a another thought, is the UK’s €3bn (£2bn) annual budget rebate, which was won by Margaret Thatcher in 1984 still in force? Im not sure, a lot seems to have happened, under this new management.

      • 106
        The big D says:

        Most of that given away by Blair as a bribe to amend the Common Agricultural Policy (not). Also EU subscriptions now denominate in Euros. Watch the UK costs rocket as the pound sinks as quantitative easing continues.

    • 279
      Rick says:

      EU accounts have not been audited for 14yrs. Apparently, no honest accountant will sign them off.

      • 388
        uk Fred says:

        What do you mean that no honest accountant would sign them off. If you dared to question them you got sacked. Ask Marta Andreassen. But then Neil Kinnock was a trougher at the EU pigpen too. They couldn’t even get an EU Accountant to sign them off.

    • 450
      The Managment says:

      animal farm lets not cloud the issue shall we Get these bastards 1st & the others 2nd

  29. 46
    Anonymous says:

    I expect as McNulty is being investigated, that he will resign his post “To clear his name”

    It cannot be right for a person to be investigated for dishonesty when he is in charge of a department that investigates and prosecutes benefit cheats.

    Resign now… better still … admit contrition and resign your seat and in your resignation statement bring the rest of them down with you. at least that way you will have some vestage of honour left.

    • 48
      Papasmurf says:

      Sorry .forgot my tag above at 45.

    • 53
      McNulty's Agent - Animal Farm Nulab my arse says:

      Let it be known that Tom McNulty never, ever (well hardly ever) claimed for a vest on expenses. Certainly not one with the words Honour on it. He only ever claimed for the one with Mr Thief on.

    • 85
      Scallywag says:

      Thugs don’t do honour…

    • 162
      Anonymous says:

      If a Police officer is being investigated for a serious criminal allegation he is suspended immediately. Why doesthis not apply to Government ministers ?

  30. 50
    Anonymous says:

    Little wonder then that Phil Woolas can’t look brave and patriotic Ghurkas in the eye.

    • 69
      Cassius says:

      I suppose that the claims for nappies were a year or two ago?

      I am no expert but from the way Joanna Lumley dealt with him I would say that he had been out of them for a year or more.

    • 266
      Margy says:

      Does Phil Woolas wear nappies and womens’ clothes or something? I just don’t understand.

      • 443

        That would be the charitable explanation. The alternative is that he claimed for something which was not “wholly and exclusively” pertaining to his employment – and that might give rise to criminal charges.

  31. 54
    eye-eye says:

    I don’t have photoshop. Come on can’t somebody produce a picture of Prescott with a loo seat round his neck standing alongside Draper with the lifebelt around his. Would sell well as a poster

    • 444

      Please could you add Woolarse dressed as Captain Blackadder, with a tampon up each nostril, and a pair of frilly knickers on his head, going “wibble, wibble”. Actually – don’t – it might encourage him to plead insanity. I’m off to get my gourd sharpened.

  32. 57
    Bath plugs for the many, not the few says:

    In any other walk in life, people who do these things are:

    dismissed immediately

    required to repay misappropriated money

    considered for prosecution

    oh, and not paid compensation for being out of a job.

    What is it about MPs that makes them different?

    • 93
      Scallywag says:

      “What is it about MPs that makes them different?”

      That most of them have never held down a proper job must be near the top of the list.

    • 333
      Doctor Mick says:

      I dunno. A lot of fat cat executives enjoy similar, if not better, lifestyles at the shareholders’ expense. They are rarely challenged as you’d be out of a job in an eyeblink. I think something similar has been happening here, that those checking the expenses had precious little management support when it came to challenging flagrant abuse of the rules. It may be obvious they’re at it but getting the proof is very difficult and you need that to make serious accusations against a powerful person. That is one of the reasons corruption flourishes. That and human greed of course.

      • 428

        I think you have it there – can you imagine some lowly Clerk standing up to an MP (especially a Minister) and getting away with it?

    • 445
      fanny by gaslight says:

      Poor impulse control.

  33. 59
    Greychatter says:

    Pleasing to see Peter Oborne on BBC news having a go at BBC journalists for their inability to criticising MPs and the government more forcefully. We need more people bringing out the truth of what goes on in public bodies we as tax payers finance.

    Wonder what Police top brass and heads of government quangos can claim on expenses?

    • 67
      Don King says:

      I saw that. What a great performance from Peter. He went fkin apoplectic !

      • 429

        Much of their cowardice still comes from them backing down on the PROVEN RIGHT 45 minutes claim. After that ZanuLabour has used the BBC as their overly obedient talking shop.

        Campbell has a lot to answer for.

    • 99
      Scallywag says:

      He accused Robinson of ‘parroting’. I didn’t know he could crack peanuts in his beak…

      • 297
        Sarah says:

        I thought I’d heard of just about every kind of sexual perversion. But what is ‘parroting’?

      • 340
        Doctor Mick says:

        A bit like the mallarkey with hamsters ‘cept the parrot can tell you when its had enough.

      • 385
        Anonymous says:

        Sarah, I believe the reference here refers to mindlessly repeating whatever nulab tell him to say. However, if you wish to further explore sexual exotica drop round to my place.

  34. 61
    grandma B says:

    Could a kind tax inspector explain to me why these M.P.’s are allowed to get away with what looks like tax evasion – perhaps some of them could/should be included in the 50% tax rate? There seems to be one rule for the average taxpayer and one for the M.P.s

    • 107
      HMRC Inspector says:

      It’s because there’s one set of rules for MPs and another set of rules for everyone else. That’s why.

      Simples…

    • 395
      uk Fred says:

      Grandma B, it works this way.

      MP’s salaries are taxed, just like everyone else.

      However their allowances are “exempt income” which means that they are not subject to tax in any way.

      Everyone else who receives allowances or expenses has to show that they are “wholly, necessarily and exclusively” for the purposes of their employment, and to see how tight this definistion is look up on the HMRC website “Mallelieu v Drummond” in which a trainee barrister was refused a claim for clothing which was only used in court because it also provided “a modicum of warmth and decency”.

      Note also please that MP’s are not allowed to use the on-line submission of tax returns like the rest of us plebs.

      Perhaps the way to deal with it is to change the rules so that the allowances are subject to tax backdated to say 1983 when the rules were first changed to provide serious allowances.

      • 417
        grandma B says:

        Dear UK Fred

        Thank you.

        All I can say how very, very, very convenient for our M.P.s to be taxed, or, more appropriately not taxed like this.

        I’ll read the HMRC website with interest, but there’s no way they’ll get this plebs tax return on line.

      • 432
        View from the Solent says:

        UK Fred, grandma B,
        Interestingly, although MPs exempted themselves from tax rules on their expenses, their own rules (the Green Book) are very clear.
        The Green Book states that the expenses must be “wholly, necessarily and exclusively incurred for the purpose of performing parliamentary duties”.
        Just like the tax rules.
        Obviously, mock tudor beams are wholly necesary for an MP to perform his parliamentary duties.

      • 438
        grandma B says:

        Any chance of getting them on capital gains tax?

        Interesting suggestion in the article by Charles Moore (under the cartoon entitled Cleaning Services) in the Telegraph, which says “One hopes that the Inland Revenue will also correlate the sale of “second” homes by M.P.s with its tax records…….or did they suddenly decide that the house was, after all, their principal residence, and so avoid paying any tax at all?

        What do you think? I guess these Hoons have got that one sorted!

  35. 62
    Don King says:

    That Bitch who claimed £250 was frugal for a toilet seat !

    DOES SHE THINK PEOPLE ARE FOOKING STUPID. ?

    I have trawled the internet & the most expensive one I can find is about £100. The most expensive one that John Lewis have is £92 for a solid designer walnut one.

    http://www.johnlewis.com/230474457/Product.aspx

    COMPETITION: CAN YOU SPEND MORE ? :)

    • 80
      Toulouse LaPrescott says:

      I can always spend more.

    • 82
      Anonymous says:

      I am reliably informed that these were a “themochromic” toilet seats.

      Prezza needed it to ensure his fag warmed the seat nicely before he sat on it.

      http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2008/01/thermochromic-t/

    • 84
      Papasmurf says:

      A proper Police investigation would cross reference receipt with invoice, just to ensure the two were the same. Any difference would be where the fraud is.

    • 97
      RobT says:

      A front loading extra-wide commode costs £269.25 here http://www.firstaidwarehouse.co.uk/xpl-toileting__521,xpg-page-0-size-10-order-price_desc.html

      Maybe she keeps her shit afraid she might end up on the DNA database.

    • 99
      Old Tory says:

      This one is nice… Computerized Toilet Seat with Twelve Button Remote Control. Features two separate water nozzles for the anterior and posterior that spray the user with warm aerated water. mmm.

      http://www.resourcesforlife.com/docs/item1421

    • 112
      Don King says:

      Its driving me phooking nuts. Even is I search the world – no koont sells a toilet seat for £250.

      • 119
        Papasmurf says:

        I am selling mine for £300……. scratched and wonky….. do you want it……10% off for cash

      • 163
        Papasmurf says:

        Don’t know if I want to drop the price…..it is already a good price. However, I do have a second toilet seat which although slightly worse wearing ( crack on the rear end, through heavy use after eating two helpings of curry) which I am willing to sell for a bargain of £230.

        Given that your employer may smell a rat…… buying the two together and then spreading the cost over two financial years, could work………. creatove accounting you see. Clever eh?

        What do you think, do you think you could get away with it?

      • 173
        Awaiting Moderation says:

        I suspect it was £10 for the bog seat and £240 for a little man from the village to come out and fit it.

        Needless to say, the little man would never consider voting for anyone else.

        Quite a lot of these expenses come under the heading ‘buying votes from the locals’.

      • 197
        Papasmurf says:

        How dare you…… I utterly refute the allegation, I will be consulting my solicitor and consider suing you for such a slur. Libelous I tell you. I am a Honourable Smurf in fact I am the Papa of Smurfs. I get smurflings to do my cleaning. The Rules state that all papasmurfs are entitled to change their toilet seats once after every crap. How do you think we papasmurfs survive on the pay that the smurflings manage to pay after scouring the Commom(s)???????

        You will hear from Smurf, Smurf and McSmurf by return of post.

      • 400
        88p bathplug (10% off) says:

        Would a bathplug do? Might let you have the Jaquiboots discount if you gurn nicely.

      • 455
        The Managment says:

        maybe £250 includes fitting :wink:

      • 479
        John Prescnut says:

        You can have both of mine for £100. My arse doesn’t fit properly and aim is poor. Wife chose the mock Tudor finish.

    • 196
      anticant says:

      I expect it was lined in swansdown, like that of a famous Victorian Mayfair tart. Top seats for top bottoms!

      • 346
        Prezza says:

        I remember that seat….

        Went to that tarts place with my girlfriend..

        it was luvly…

    • 256
      Hoonbusters says:

      250? Now where did I hear that number before? Oh yes… if you went over that you had to produce a receipt.

      So do we have anything other than this MPs word for the price? Or even that the bog flap existed in the first place?

  36. 64
    Backwoodsman says:

    Brilliant, tourism Minister spends 25K on security, ‘ because she feels insecure in London’ . Those of us who thought champagne socialists don’t do irony, were clearly wrong !!!!
    Dear old beeboids quick to run with ‘police investigating leaks’ interference play. How about ‘police investigating complaints by outraged members of public’ ?

    • 206
      anon says:

      I saw that on the BBC news (labour ,propaganda service)earlier. How does a potential police investigation in to a possible criminal act eclipse actual criminal acts occurring daily by the ruling classes? I wonder who called in the police in the first place? Was the same folk who didn’t like opposition MPs telling everyone about their dirty underhanded sleaze campaigns?

    • 399
      "For the restless, not the true believers, this one's for you.." says:

      Cost to the public purse for keeping neurotic, scared women in London = £25,000

      Cost to the public purse for keeping one gang rape victim a virtual prisoner in her own home for 4 years =

      A failed police investigation.
      A failure in case building by CPS
      A failed IPCC investigation.
      A second failed police investigation.

      Cost = Unknown, possibly 100,000

      Counselling services for victim over a four year period, £10,000 – ongoing.

      Social Security cost dues to deteriorating mental and physical health. approx £30000

      Lost of career/business to the victim, approx £100,000 to date.

      Compensation paid to the victim by Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority = £0.00

  37. 65
    Barbara Follett says:

    You should be glad that violent crime has been reduced by 99 per cent since Labour came to power.

    Otherwise, just think what I would have had to charge for my private security arrangements.

    • 165
      Doctor Mick says:

      You know I was mugged myself a few years back by three Ruskis. Unfortunately I could not get the taxpayer to provide me a free round the clock security service so I had to take responsibility for my own personal safety. I stopped walking home alone half drunk at 3 am through the back streets of provincial central asian cities and I’ve never been done since. Those are the rules you need to follow.

    • 403

      Are Barbara, there you are.

      Do you know I’m trying to persuade your constituency to throw you out. Come on Stevenage – here’s why you need to chuck Barbara out.

      Call for a by-election now. Get rid of the ultimate Champagne Socialist

  38. 66
    Johan says:

    Build their gallows high!

  39. 68
    Animal Farm Nulab my arse says:

    Anybody in B&Q online, can you send a job lot of bathplugs to the Commons as a sign of disgust.
    In Iraq they throw slippers.
    In Brussels € at the problem
    In UK we send bathplugs – very British and civilised I’d say.

    • 73
      Don King says:

      I reckon you have something here. ? What is the address to send it too ?

      Will it matter if I send one covered in poo ?

    • 87
      eye-eye says:

      Good idea to supplement the ” Shirt off your back ” to No. 10

      Send a cheap bathplug to Jaqui…..dont bother with postage stamps. She will have to pay upon receipt.

      Can somebody come up with her address

      • 101
        Don King says:

        BATHPLUG APPEAL
        The Rt Hoon Jacqui Smith MP
        House of Commons,
        Westminster,
        London,
        SW1A 0AA

      • 178
        Anonymous says:

        Lets send her some bathplugs !

      • 230
        Bob Builder says:

        I’ve just ordered a thousand off a bloke in China, only cost ten bob. do i send them individually or as a job lot and can o claim they postage back; after all allowing her to concentrate on her job rather than whether or not her bath stays full must be in the spirit an rules of the green book.

      • 252
        Dogger says:

        Actually, I think what I sent her was in fact a sink plug, but let her find that out!

  40. 74
    bentkopper says:

    Cowards die many times in their lives: the Valiant taste of death but once.

    Minister of the Crown now get recycable coffins on expenses.

  41. 75
    Moley says:

    If the politicians are so certain that they are in the right over their expenses, why have they tried so hard to keep the information secret?

  42. 76
    StrongholdBarricades says:

    Is that video implicating some chap having a guiness sitting by his lap top too?

  43. 77
    Little Shop of Horrors says:

    Probably time for Parliament version of this film, with

    Crystal Blears, Harriet Ronnette and Chiffon Woolas as the doo-wop girl band explaining how they rob innocent taxpayers to fund their lavish lifestyles and property speculating careers.

    And don’t forget the bathplug.

  44. 78
    BASTARD says:

    Why are these fuckers using the excuse of “its the system”. Do they not realise they are elected to GOVERN over the populace? Who gives a fuck what the system allows. Expenses are a rebate of costs incurred of doing your job, not free fucking gravey.

    Good governance doesnt allow you to pillage the system just because the rules are lax. Good governance means delivering the best possible outcome to your stakeholders / shareholders / electorate at the lowest risk or cost.

    Without the ability to govern themselves as individuals, they clearly have no legitamacy of governing over the rest of us. Election Now. Prosecutions to follow. A good long spell in chokey for the lot of them.

    Looking for Balls and Ball’Sac expenses being revealed.

    As for McNulty hope the tub thumping bullshitter gets dry humped in perpetuity.

    • 105
      M.T.BUCKET says:

      They created the system, so its self admission of incompetence.

    • 120
      Gendeau says:

      WTF has “Good governance” got to do with zanulaba?

      If the government had done a great job for the last 12 years, I wouldn’t want them strung up*, but they haven’t and I do.

      * I’d still demand they were treated and taxed like a normal employee.

    • 401
      Broom and Dust says:

      Its known as acting in good faith or acting in bad faith.
      For this tribe bad faith is all they know.

  45. 79
    Dr. Nad says:

    Nice vid. Who is the fat git drinking the Guiness though?

  46. 90
    Bollocks to NuLabour says:

    When are the police going to wake up to the shit-storm they are creating by allowing themselves to be politicised. The public expects them to enforce the law of the land with an even hand and not be influenced by anyone, regardless of position, in pursuit of the truth.

    The powers given to the police have allowed the worst officers to act like little Hitlers. The rights of public assembly are being eroded; anti-terrorism laws are being used and abused to suit any purpose they see fit; tactics such as kettleing, in itself a danger to the public, is seen as the norm; and officers that in their day to day conduct treat the public like scum, harassing and swearing at the man in the street, arresting member of the public under public order laws if you so much as swear to/in front of them.

    I don’t expect the police to investigate anything. The upper management are as career driven as the MPs; the public is regarded as an inconvience at at best, a future criminal, or a pain in the arse that needs controlling.

    • 186
      Anonymous says:

      They are also placemen who have risen through the ranks because throughout the interview panels they have shown they can parrot the political dogma of the day whether or not they really believe it ( which most of them dont) however this does not weigh heavily on their concience as the important thing is their promotion prospects and to hell with public service.

      • 192
        Anonymous says:

        The worrying thing is , all the PC Drones which were cultivated and promoted throughout the Ian Blair Regime are now being sent out to hold office in the rest of the UK’s forces.

    • 393
      Anonymous says:

      The police have lost all sense of right and wrong. In the last day or so they have been shouting about how wonderful it is to keep the DNA of innocent people (naturally the police don’t allow their own DNA to be on the register, hypocrites!). Totally politicised, lacking all credibility, and having lost all respect.

      Incidentally, I went for an interview for a clerical job with the police. It was an absolute disgrace. Not one question related to my experience or abilities, nor to the requirements of the job. The whole thing was about whether I was a suitably touchy-feeling pc tosser – turned out I wasn’t!

  47. 103
    Anonymous says:

    So why does a junior Tourism minister no one has ever heard of need security outside her second home 24/7, when the Home Secretary who everyone has heard of lives in her sister’s spare room in Peckham ?

    Could it be that both are making shedloads of dosh out of their arrangements? Surely NOT, wash my mouth out.

  48. 104
    Vas deferens says:

    Whatever they say about vaseline, and some of it is not entirely complimentary, it is to be supsected that he was not acting within the spirit of the rules when he trousered £75,000.

    You lube if you want to.

    • 114
      Subversive Train Driver says:

      Stanmore to Westminster, 25 minutes mate. 22 if you put your foot down.

  49. 111
    Blind Bloke says:

    Morning campers. Anything in the news today?

    • 337
      PC Mad MIck says:

      Move along now, please. There’s nothing to see

      • 368
        Carter Fuck says:

        As i keep telling you all…

        All my clients are innocent and pure as the driven snow…

  50. 114
    Anonymous says:

    Did anyone see the “useful idiot” doing this mornings papers on SKY just there? Apparently we shouldnt be making a fuss about MP’s expenses because corruption is much worse in other countries and Gordon Brown is far to busy running the country to be bothered about filling in expense claims . (Wondered why if he is so busy he even bothered to see his brother alright then ?). Quite clearly this chap will be part of an organisation receiving grants from the Government and is probably hoping for recognition in the honours list for the work he does in the inner cities. Makes sense “innit”

    • 156
      Anonymous says:

      He appeared to have been pre-programmed by the Government’s rapid rebuttal unit. It was awful. And to be honest who the fuck cares about other countries and what they get up to. I live here.

      Expect him to be up for a safe seat at the next election.

      • 201
        Anonymous says:

        This contributor also thought it was important to realise that inapproriate expense claims are also evident in the Private sector. What does this idiot not understand, this is THE PUBLIC PURSE we are talking about. Private business is not funded by the tax payer and any scams there are between the claimant and his boss. Fuck me with such fuckwittery about no wonder this government have had an easy ride of it !

      • 205
        Anonymous says:

        There are no safe seats anymore. For Liebour ze war ees over !

    • 376
      Carter Fuck says:

      Hos brother works for EDF (French bState Electricity Company….EDF have just taken over the British Nuclear plants…

      Huge contracts in the pipeline…

      And of course no conflict of interest..

      PS I wonder which “public relations” form EDF pays…Mendelson’s (or did I see that Mendelson sold out his “public relations” and is now a millionnaire !??!

      • 447
        Beautiful Day says:

        Perhaps if EDF customers started switching suppliers and telling them it’s so they can afford a cleaner . . .

  51. 121
    Scallywag says:

    FOR SALE

    Previously owned moral compass with slight mechanical damage occasioned through impact with office wall following its inability to point the same way as the owner required it to. Otherwise in good order.

    Sundry mobile phones and a couple of LaserJets in a similar condition are also offered for a quick sale.

    Cash only – no cheques. No timewasters

    Apply G Brown, !0 Downing St, London SW1 1AA

  52. 122
    Mark Oaten says:

    Send that to me!

  53. 123
    Casual Observer says:

    What is the point of Stephen Pound? Anybody know?

  54. 124
    Jeff and Mutt says:

    Nope, nothing do.

    Only a lot of squealing down at the funny farm.

  55. 125
    Don King says:

    Can you put that up for sale on EBAY ?

    I reckon you’ll get a mass of interext :)

    • 242
      genghiz the kahn says:

      Shome mistake here shurely.

      “Moral Compass for sale, Mint Condition.”

      Apply J R Braun, Westminster Palace.

  56. 126
    Norma Snockers says:

    Just signed the petition

  57. 127
    Old Man says:

    I know what, lets set up yet another fucking independent inquiry, great one that! gets it on the back burner (and yet more soft jobs for the boys)

  58. 128
    Yevette Hooper says:

    Fucking OAPs, war veterans and the rest of them, fucking scroungers the lot. What have they ever done to deserve anything from the state? I say give it all to the needy Romanian immigrants; what’s left after the tax payer’s finished paying for my second home anyway.

  59. 129
    Labour MP says:

    Sweet. I’ve just ordered two on expenses. Once for my primary residence in Westminster and the other for my secondary residence in …err… Westminster.

  60. 130
    Titus Finckter says:

    Moral compass aha ha ha ha.

  61. 131
    Anonymous says:

    Brown/Balls/McNulty-what a team!

  62. 132
    John "Two Bogs" Prescott says:

    Eh oop
    £250 for a bog seat?
    Blimey
    I got two steel reinforced kevlar lines ones for the same money
    Due to me medical condition I kept shatterin t’others, plus as I am so important and I worry about my safety they had to be bullet proof.
    Fook off
    Sorry
    Go Fourth

    • 145
      Anonymous says:

      Were the toilet seats hand made to match the tudor beams?

      • 167
        Anonymous says:

        One to shit in, and one to throw up in.

      • 480
        John Prescnut plc says:

        Direct from the Mary Rose they are. I reckon that Nelson probably had his last dump through one of them. Or do I mean Drake? That’s the bloody trouble with sailors. I can hardly even tell Gordon and Peter apart! Bugger me, it’s the way I tell ‘em. Can’t ‘ang about …. have two bog lids to put on eBay so can lose the bloody evidence.

    • 215
      Scallywag says:

      One for each Jag…

  63. 133
    two shags says:

    i’ve heard that she can take a lot more than three fingers…..

  64. 135
    Dogger says:

    I’m sending an old one I found in the shed, along with the message “Hope this fits, Jacqui” and a second class stamp to cover my estimate of her administrative costs in claiming the reimbursement, which would also have been paid by the taxpayer.

  65. 136
    Don King says:

    Actually Papasmurf I would like to purchase it, but at 10% of it would be £270 and unfortunately my employer might smell a rat . However if you are willing to drop the price to £250 I think that would be a bargin.

  66. 137
    Rexel 56 says:

    No mention of Balls and Cooper yet, is this because:

    a) they are running a black op through the Telegraph to damage rivals
    b) the DT is saving them for a Balls special on Sunday that will destroy them
    c) there is nothing questionable in their expenses
    d) they have better lawyers than everyone else
    e) any other reason (please give details)

    Answers on a postcard…..

    • 149
      John says:

      Sunday’s big scoop, if they are double dipping they need to be taken down, especially if they are both claiming the full second home allowance.

    • 150
      Don King says:

      Bit of a wild guess here but just maybe…… they only took their wages ?

      I’ll get me coat.

    • 257
      Colonel Madd says:

      The internal battle between the ST and the DT over who gets the choicest titbits has apparently been fairly spectacular and appears to have been refereed by the twins personally(as was the decision to pony up for the information)

      It looks pretty well certain that Mr and Mrs Balls are going to be served up as the main course on Sunday and the obvious implication of the delay is that the ST’s hounds will have been truffling through both sets of claims looking for double dipping.The Fees Office has almost certainly NOT cross checked both claims in tandem and the gruesome twosome will not have been able to repay any moneys without admitting a criminal offence

      I wonder what sort of print run the ST will have this weekend??

    • 331
      Anonymous says:

      Rumours on ConHome are Cooper and Balls will feature BIG Time tomorrow.

      Please let it be true please

    • 474
      Scallywag says:

      It’s b), but it won’t be this Sunday. They are saving Balls and his odious wife for a time when things have died down a bit. Perhaps just after they have blown the gaff on a few Tories just to take the sting out of it.

  67. 138
    You, tube says:

    Clap

  68. 139
    grandma B says:

    Thanks for the reply, but I could do with a bit more information re Inland Revenue rules on benefits in kind.

  69. 140
    English Liberation Front says:

    Closin’ in on McNulty eh? Doesn’t bear thinkin’ about. Couldn’t happen to a nicer chap, one of New Labour’s special people.

  70. 143
    The Beast of Clerkenwell says:

    Is it true that you can get a quote from Stephen Pound at the pound shop?

  71. 148
    Euruck Hunt-Gordon says:

    Forget the minions.Plod should be digging very deep into Broons cleaning arrangements.The sooner he’s in prison ,along with most of the cabinet,the sooner we can start digging ourselves out of the pile of carp they’ve turned our country into.

    • 187
      Richard Timney says:

      “….pile of carp?”

      I wondered where that fishy smell was coming from.

  72. 151
    Nik Nak says:

    now the shit has hit the pan, tops up belly wobble John “Pancracker” Prescott is a bit quiet on the old question of expenses

    http://www.gofourth.co.uk/johns_blog

    The old lard arsed buffoon usually has plenty to say about everything

    Come on Prezza you old class war commie bastard let us know what you think

  73. 155
    Dogger says:

    Fees Office: ‘collusion’. Is that too weak a word for their role in this?

    • 174
      Papasmurf says:

      No…. more correct term is Conspiracy, Aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring and Malfeasance in Public Office.

      • 212
        Anonymous says:

        there is also the criminal offence of “Defalcation” which applies to public servants who fraudulently obtain pecuniary advantage through fraud.

      • 225
        Papasmurf says:

        Don’t you mean defecation……… ie as in Defecation is the final act of digestion by which organisms eliminate solid, semisolid or liquid waste material……. MP’s from a corrupt system of government?

    • 216
      Dogger says:

      Can I just say ‘fees office’ and ‘collusion’ again, to help Google find this page? Thank you. Other key words: House of Commons Department of Resources

  74. 158
    NETTLE UP YER KILT says:

    Bathplug on it’s way to Rt Hoon Jacqui Sniff MP.

  75. 159

    To rebuild confidence in both houses of parliament I suggest we take up the proposal below.

    It should be an honour to be an MP’s and serve the electorate and the country so MP’s pay will stay the same. As MP’s do not need qualifications to become an MP the wages should be designed to keep them in touch with the average worker. While they are MP’s Lords and Baronets they will not be permitted to have any other job or consultancy nor shall they be a member of a local parliament or council.
    Lords and Baronets will be given a flat rate for voting, no more sign in and leave.

    We need to build possibly in an old Army or TA location in central London, MP, Lords and Baronets Apartments. The apartments will be for MP’s Lords and Baronets who live outside a 75 miles radius form parliament (If an MP has a constituency within the 75 miles radius but decides to lives outside their constituency they will be given the option to stay at the apartments at a flat fee of £75 per night). MP’s Lords and Baronets can take up the offer of to live there or not. If not they will not get any living allowance in consideration!

    The apartments will be 2 bed roomed with a cooker, fridge, washing machine, tumble dryer and carpeted. They will be cleaned for the MP’s, Lords and Baronets by an appointed firm and have free telephone, sky/cable TV, internet, free utilities and council tax, maintenance and guarded by the Met or a security firm.

    The MP, Lords and Baronets will provide all the furnishings and food, when the MP’s leave parliament they will move out and the new MP will move in after the apartment has been a cleaned and painted. If unelected an MP’s will get a one off payment of £1500 to move out of the apartment, if they retire they will cover the cost themselves.

    The apartment will be for the sole use of the MP, Lord and Baronet. They cannot be used for any other purpose, i.e. children, family or friends unless accompanied by the MP, Lord and Baronet!

    The MP, Lords and Baronets will get reimbursed for flights in economy class, fist class rail travel, bus journeys, and after 8pm a taxi from Parliament to the apartment only and only after producing a receipt. They will get 10 free flights for their partners a year non transferable, no other subsidy for partners.

    MP’s Lords and Baronets will get 35 days holiday a year. MP’s pension entitlement will be as that of the Armed Forces. Only after 22 years service will an MP get their full pension, not the 12 years currently.

    They must advertise all jobs in their offices; no family member will be automatically given a job. Constituency offices will be owned and operated by the party, constituency offices will not be owned by the MP’s family, extended family or friends. All MP’s will get a flat rate office allowance set at the average for financial year 06/07 and a flat rate motor mileage allowance set at the average for financial year 06/07.

    If there are other constructive points add them here we can then send them to the commission into MP’s pay and conditions for their consideration, and if they come up with something that is outlandish we can inform them that this is against public opinion!

    • 193
      G says:

      Well thought out!

      Good luck with getting more people to read it….

    • 238

      Our MPs are always holding up the Swedish ‘model’ of just about everything as a shining example of democracy and the Swedes have a similar housing system. If communal living is good enough for them I wonder why our own MPs haven’t jumped on this particular bandwagon as well …

      • 361
        Dr Nuts says:

        I thought they had – and then charged the affair as expenses!!

      • 381
        Carter Fuck says:

        OHM…

        They will start putting their communal orgies on expenses then…

        I cant’ defend that…going too far do’”nt you think..two by two M/M, F/F/, M/F that’s fine on expenses but not FFFF/MMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    • 269
      Matt Lowe says:

      well thought out; a bit unlikely though. Interestingly, you mentioned the armed services, during a recent court martial held in Portsmouth several junior service persons were convicted of making fraudulent claims and punished accordingly; I wonder if any tried the clerical error, within the rules but not the spirit, or it’s now been repaid (bugger I’ve been caught) lines of defence?

    • 275
      Bhurpa Joe says:

      Does the 22 year thing count for the Ghurkas as well?

    • 296
      Anonymous MP says:

      That all sounds like good common-sense. What’s in it for me?

    • 402
      fanny by gaslight says:

      “fist class rail travel”

      ….sounds good.

      Seriously – that is a great idea, but they won’t buy it, as they would whine about being a target for terrorists.

    • 404
      Uddin a thief by any other name says:

      Milady the Baroness Udderly Disgusting would not approve of the proposed accomodation, too close to the office.

  76. 164
    Phil Lillets-Woolas says:

    McNulty thinks he’s got a problem?

  77. 166
    Lord Tuscan of Tony says:

    It’s all within the rules that we’re about to make up.

    • 249
      genghiz the kahn says:

      Is this the Nuremberg Defence – I was only obeying orders…

      • 363
        Dr Nuts says:

        Nuremberg stated – that is not a defence.

        The point was emphasised after Mei Lei (sic) when the US was charged with war crimes in Vietnam. (The good old days when the US obeyed the laws!).

  78. 168
    January 2008, first-time buyers: don’t delay says:

    ‘Regal’ Margaret Beckett keeps £250,000-a-year police guard

    MARGARET BECKETT is receiving round-the-clock police protection and the use of chauffeur-driven cars despite being removed as foreign secretary two years ago.
    Lucky first time buyers ignored her advice!

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6211504.ece

    • 481
      Sir Cumcision of Whales says:

      It’s the Pug-Ugly Protection Squad. She can sour lemons at 10 feet.

  79. 171
    Anonymous says:

    Woolas saying he didn’t claim for women’s clothes etc , only food. Why the hell are we paying for his food?

  80. 175
    BOFL http://ageofkali.blogspot.com/ says:

    so how did gordon get the money to buy his 2 properties in the early nineties?

    he was not earning enough to get bona fide mortgages.

    i believe that nowadays some criminals can have their ill gotten gains seized.

    i am glad that peter oborne has read this blog.

    every penny needs to be repaid by ALL of these bastards.

    homes,tvs,bathplugs all sold off……..

    and they should all be sacked and their pensions stopped.

    there are 7 million economically inactive people in the uk……..

    findings replacements will not be a problem!

  81. 176
    Sir Reginald Titbrain says:

    I know many of you are saddened at that Charles Hardwidge was deserted us, hoplefully he will be back, but he has just posted this gem on Labourlist, concerning the possibility of a Cruddas -Purnell partnership [nightmare ticket?] to oust Snottie. Brace yourselves…

    …..”Recalling the hype around Duke Nuken Forever, development hell, and subsequent collapse of 3D Realms, this potential leadership team may have some traction. I like the general idea of “invest in loss”, and Cruddas has the style and Purnell has the intellectual capital to deliver a blockbuster. Whether this GB (Gordon Brown) can rekindle his spark or be quitely put out to pasture like the other GB (George Broussard) remains to be seen. Whatever happens, now is usually a good time.

    I like the basic idea of “invest in loss” but the implementation and media storm is getting in the way. I’d already decided in my own mind that if Gordon Brown didn’t put in a convincing performance at the last PMQ he should leave. While I had hopes he’d rise to the occasion I’m more interested in the goals happening than propping up an individuals ego. Like Broussard, Brown may have aimed to high and just got tangled up in the realities. This happens but the world moves on. Sometimes, you have to cut your losses and get with that.

    Hail to the King, baby! ……”

    Brings a tear to the eye, doesn’t it?

    • 268
      Anonymous says:

      We miss you Charles.

    • 283
      Ivan Horn says:

      He must have been pissed as a newt when he wrote that rubbish.

    • 303
      Sarah says:

      I no longer read Fuckwidge’s emissions. There’s a point at which my sense of humour deserts me completely, mainly due to the venomous bile which he sprays around like a spitting cobra.
      Combined that with his eerie sense of self-importance (google him, and you’ll see what I mean) and utter inability to follow the flow of a conversation and you have a ‘care in the community’ candidate, with all the charm of a box jelly fish.
      Still, I’m glad he amuses others, as laughter is the only defence against such high levels of utter fuckwittery.

      • 409
        Marxist scum- I give you the liebour parteh says:

        ‘care in the community’

        Would that be of the Baby Peter kind?

      • 460
        Bad Magic says:

        Noted. He always put me in mind of Eraserhead…

    • 411
      uk Fred says:

      With his vocabulary, he is so obviously a product of ZaNu Lie Baah education. He doesn’t know the difference between to and too, or quite and quiet. Obviously bog standard comprehensively educated, and it shows.

  82. 182

    But there’s good news for John “two bogs” Prescott….

    He’s had a heavy duty toilet seat named after him…honest….

    • 189
      Proctologist says:

      Why doesn’t he just park his fat flabby swine-butt on an industrial skip. Should be big enough to take a massive arse-blast of half-digested pies and chips.

  83. 191

    As Jonathan Cook’s already indicated, Guido, the offence of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception has been repealed – the person who complained isn’t aware of that, or else the police don’t know what they’re doing. Anyway, it wouldn’t have covered McNulty’s case (it was about getting a job by lying on your CV, basically).

    If there is an offence to investigate here, it must be fraud under the Fraud Act 2006, sections 2, 3 or 4. Or conceivably false accounting under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968.

    I doubt anything can be charged here, though. While saying “it was within the rules” is no defence politically, if a claim really was within the rules, then it’s difficult to call it dishonest in legal terms, and all these offences require dishonesty.

    Anyway, the really interesting fact isn’t the police’s possible investigation of Tony McNulty; it’s the outrageous calling in of the police to investigate the leak. The Speaker’s doing a Jacqui Smith, using the police to try to stop embarrassment to politicians.

    • 217
      Cassius says:

      Wouldn’t it still be the correct charge, given that the alleged offence took place before the Fraud Act came into force?

    • 218
      Anonymous says:

      As must be repeated desp[ite the official line, MANY of these claims are clearly NOT WITHIN THE RULES.

    • 422
      Boris for President of UK says:

      SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL

      To : The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

      From : Mayor Boris Johnson

      Sir,

      I have the pleasure to inform you, Sir, that if you proceed with the investigation of the leaking of MPs expenses, I will have you summarily sacked.

      I am fed up with the Police of London behaving like the Keystone Cops…I loved those films when I was 10 years old…..but I have put away childish things now.

      So be warned. I sacked your predecessor for lesser absurdities that pursuing honest citizens for to to find out where THEIR money went.

      Faithfully yours,

      Your Mayor, Boris “the King” Johnson

  84. 202
    Euro Lottery Winner says:

    Hola Ingles! Will my £110m cover all your MP’s expenses or just the one they call Senor Prescott?

    What is hoon in Spanish?

  85. 209
    Road_Hog says:

    What’s this after a member of the public had complained? So if no member of the public had complained, plod would have just sat on his arse?

    Surely plod could have acted on the fact that a crime appears to have been committed and investigated it, when did it become necessary for the public to prompt them.

    • 449
      fanny by gaslight says:

      They were certainly quick off the mark when Boris trousered Tariq Aziz’s cigar box. Even when Aziz said it was ok..

  86. 214
    Anonymous says:

    Time to form an Anti Scum party.

    Labour – Bankrupting Britain since 1929!

  87. 221
    Jonathan Cook says:

    Sunday’s revelations – I’m predicting:

    1. Ed Balls and Yvette

    2. Peter Hain

    3. Tony McNulty

    4. Harriet Harman

    • 232
      Curious says:

      Is Cameron immune because the DT dare not raise quesions in case the expense concerned could be linked to his disabled son?

      • 244
        John says:

        Cameron seemed very relaxed when he was interviewed, as if he had nothing to worry about and seemed to have everything in hand, he is a PR man so will know when is the best time to anounance/release/leak the actions he is/has taken with the Conservative party.

        If home improvement payments were linked to his son, it would be difficult for New Lab and their friends in the press to spin this as an abuse.

    • 236
      M.T.BUCKET says:

      You missed out tricky mickey, or do you think he will get the monday edition to himself.

    • 407
      Anonymous says:

      Please please include those troughing pigs, Peter and Iris Robinson.

    • 436
      St George Spits says:

      Harman lives in London, so no second home, right ?

      Maybe she did an Uddin ?

  88. 226
    Moley says:

    Police may use water cannon to control violent demonstrations.

    Headline from Times Online. Latest News.

    Are they getting frightened?

    • 350
      English Liberation Front says:

      So un-British. We prefer them with little wooden batons and whistles and tit-hats that we can knock off.

    • 464
      Bad Magic says:

      It would suit these Hoons to have a little bit of chaos, so they can overreact, clamp down with the goon squad and lord it up ‘see? Terrorists! Only we can keep you safe! ID cards would have stopped this… somehow… woooo-ooooo Terrorism!’

  89. 227
    Swiss Bob says:

    Delicious isn’t it?

    What these arseholes seem to forget is that they may have used Parliament to set themselves above some of the laws of the land, but not all of them.

    Plod, get off your fat backsides and do some proper police work for a change.

    McNulty in a few months time: McNulty where he belongs

    • 281
      Whereareplodwhenuneed'em? says:

      Plod isn’t interested. After all, Nulabour spent a decade installing their friendly patsies into all the top police positions, for just such an event. “We shall be proceeding in a westerly direction to parliament to arrest fiddling MPs. So long as they is Tory.”

      • 324
        It doesn't add up... says:

        The HOC is roughly due east of New Scotland Yard, so you’re right…. they’ll be heading 180 degrees in the wrong direction as usual

      • 334
        P.C. Filth says:

        No matter, sir. We’ll have our lights and woo-woos going so it doesn’t make any difference which way we go. Efficiency, you see. Over.

  90. 233
    bentkopper says:

    June 2010. Gordon Brown and Cabinet seen running down Whitehall with free poppy wreaths.

  91. 235

    That is just so good!

  92. 237
    V says:

    Who cares about the Tories details being published? I mean they are not in power at the moment, so whats the point. It is the Labour expense-claiming revelations that are having the biggest impact. Those in power must be the one’s that should be held to account in case of power abuse. And boy, have they abused their power. And our tax money, to no ones advantage but their own.

    Get the wall and the rifle ready for these greedy red ragged piggy’s.

  93. 241
    CryBaby says:

    A member of public? – that is just fantastic.

    I wrote to Pola Uddin to resign and she didnt. The more the public get involved, directly with their MPs, Police, councils – the more they’ll start to realise who is in charge!

    • 280
      Indigo says:

      If my MP appears in any of the soon-to-be-published reports in the Telegraph, I will be one member of the public getting involved. Dear me, yes.

    • 377
      Dr Nuts says:

      Well, what was the promise when they were elected?
      Trough no Crime and Tough on the Cardrivers!

    • 483
      Corporal Jones (fuzzy wuzzies & bar) says:

      They do not like it up ‘em! They don’t like it up ‘em!
      Please let me volunteer to be the one to put it up ‘em, sir.

  94. 245
    Romeo says:

    I hope somebody has complained to the police about that other possible fraudster and cheat, Baroness Uddin. If not I will do so myself. Is there anyway of finding out whether this is being dealt with by the police?

  95. 245
    Anonymous says:

    MPs seem to be closing ranks. Very very few of them are sticking up for the public they serve. Only Kate Hoey and Nick Clegg are able to hold their heads with pride so far.

  96. 253
    bentkopper says:

    Kit Kats and bath plugs. What a pathetic bunch of grovelling cowardly Shoplifters our MPs and Ministers are. Have they no balls. Bernard Madoff Admits 50 Billion Dollar Fraud, now you’re talking.

    • 321
      Richard Timney says:

      Hey Hazel baby, forget the Kit Kats, I’ve got all the fingers you’ll need.

    • 379
      Dr Nuts says:

      Have they got any Balls?

      Nope – he’s done McCaverty Cat!

  97. 255
    Two Bogs Prescott says:

    Please call me “John John”.

  98. 259
    Cillit Bang says:

    No news of David “Mastermind” Lammy or Dawn “Obama’s my biggest fan” Butler yet?

  99. 260

    Excellent video!
    That is just what they are.
    Benefit cheats. Nothing more, nothing less.
    Have you seen the Top Ten Techniques that these jokers have been using to relieve us of our hard earned cash?

    GIve me strength.

  100. 265
    bentkopper says:

    3000 steelworkers about to lose their job in Redcar-by-the-sea and Lord Mandelson, (genuflect-rise) spends £3000 repairing his roof to stop leaks.

    £1 for every steelworker.

    • 282
      Anonymous says:

      Actually Mandelson only spent £385 on his roof, according to the Telegraph

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5293035/MPs-expenses-Questions-over-timing-of-Peter-Mandelsons-house-claim.html

      which rather throws into doubt his melodramatic claims on TV yesterday about water pouring down his living room walls – or was it sitting room? It definitely wasn’t his lounge though.

      • 284
        Margy says:

        It was his pink boudoir.

      • 285
        Papasmurf says:

        Sharp!! Well done…….just need someone on this site that reads it to pick up on that and put it to him.

        No doubt Mandy reads it too so will get his defence up and running though.

      • 315
        Subversive Roofer says:

        He had two loose tiles, mate.

      • 322
        Anonymous says:

        Precisely – loose tiles – he knowingly gave the impression that it was a huge job – £3,000 worth though.

      • 408
        Augeas says:

        So the decorating was done first, and the roof repaired 2 months later. Doesn’t quite square with the melodramatic stuff he was giving out about rain pouring in on him…

    • 352
      Doctor Mick says:

      You know, Redcar beach is where they filmed the Dunkirk evacuation scenes in the film Atonement.

      If you’d actually been there you wouldn’t be surprised to learn that they had to clean the place up before they filmed the battle scenes, not after.

      Well it’s going to be a helluva lot more depressing now. And even more so if the Boro go down.

  101. 276
    Indigo says:

    If the MPs repaid all their ill-gotten gains, would the Bank of England be able to stop printing money?

  102. 288
    Papasmurf says:

    Love the Save the Mimimum Wage Banner…Guido.

    Could turn it into a demo against Parliamentry Corruption.

    • 314
      Annette Curtin says:

      You could demonstrate until you’re blue in the face, to no avail.

      Oh! Wait though… :wink:

  103. 289
    Ratsniffer says:

    You can imagine these labour MPs when they were at uni having a debate at one of their student communist societies. All those young idealistic Wolfie Smiths:

    “Yeah, like, those fat tories with two houses, all fiddling their expenses! Down with capitalist thieves!”

    Spin on 20 years…..young commies have morphed into trough-snaffling porkers with, er, two homes and massive expenses….not to mention mock tudor beams.

    • 301
      resurgemus says:

      I sincerely hope you’re not including ex NUS president Phil Woolas in that remark – he’ll sue you, you know

    • 410
      Fred Bakunin says:

      We don’t have to imagine – we can remember. You’re dead right – I remember Dave “Spart” Aaronovitch, doughty defender of NuLab, standing on a Broad Left ticket (anything from CPGB to Labour) before he got thrown out of Oxford.

      • 451
        fanny by gaslight says:

        Woolarse comes from the cesspit that was NUS in the 70s/80s, as well.

    • 462
      Ben Elton says:

      But at least they are not fat Tories!

  104. 290
    JimDee says:

    They are all in on it. Even the few that had enough conscience not to thieve like bastards are party to a massive criminal conspiracy to defraud taxpayers.

    China has the right idea – she executes corrupt politicians. We should do the same. It would be great to see MPs whipped to death in public.

  105. 291
    bentkopper says:

    Leader of The Monster Raving Lunatic Party:

    “Go back to your constituencies and prepare for government”.

    • 295
      Anonymous says:

      Has he lost the plot? That is NOT a daft idea.

    • 325
      David Sutch says:

      Bloody hell. Are we still going?
      Things OK up here – just having a chuckle at the shit you’ve got in parliament these days.
      Vote Loony – you know it makes sense.

  106. 294
    semo says:

    GUIDO,
    PLEASE PLEASEPLEASE START A CAMPAIGN TO MARCH ON PARLIAMENT IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE.EVEN IF IT WAS A CROSS PARTY MARCH.OUR DEMOCRACY NEEDS TO BE DEFENDED AGAINST THESE FRAUDSTERS. PLEASE GUIDO. I BEG YOU. SEMO

    • 298
      Papasmurf says:

      You could call it Ar..Guido’s Status for Justice.

      We could all climb onto Harriets roof.

      • 387
        Agent Satsuma says:

        Which roof?

      • 484
        Pattie O'Eater says:

        we call start a dirty walls campaign. Write slogans in public places, such as:

        MPs do it with my tax.
        Stuff a Hoon for Christmas.
        Ministers have deep pockets – our cash is in there.
        New Labour, Do Hard Labour.
        HM Government – crooks in cloisters.

    • 305
      Anonymous says:

      The ‘march chant’ could be ‘we want our money back’

  107. 300

    Rather than go for the M.P’s the police investigation should be directed at those who physically approved the payment and the recipient M.P. then joined in on the charge sheet. the persons concerned should also be immediately suspended as clearly a system exists and is as laid down in the green book.

    This is rather like the old style Lloyds where potential names for a modest investment of around £24 k were promised unlimited returns for life whilst also accepting unlimited personal liability – sadly for those names the whole thing turned sour. But back to our tale.

    Once a conviction is obtained, the rest can then be charged and it all becomes a legal process sausage machine, churning out convictions at a rate of knots, resulting in wholesale resignations or retirements overseas or to warmer climes where an extradition treaty has yet to be established.

    I wiould advise buying extra copies of the Telegraph as before long they will be collectors items as through this series of scandals the whole face of parliament as we know it is about to change, it is a brave MP seeking re-election who goes out on the stump knocking on doors and kissing babies who does not have a cast iron rebuttal.

    In fact next May would be the ideal time for individual members of the public to ask for a police investigation of his/ her MP if they appear in the Telegraph or in any way involved in this shameful exercise whcih will be revealed when the supporting documents are published. Any spin doctor or junior lawyer will tell you that existing police investigations have to be formally declared on election literature!!!!.

    I would also offer a lifeboat to our MPs if they unreservedly withdrew all their cliams since being elected and repay all monies in full without deduction. Then their honour remains intact.

    Finally for no good reason too many Anonymous says: on GUIDO and other blog sites, show people you are angry use your real name publish and be damned and i’ll be damned if these pedigree snouts in the trough are allowed to get away with this. The money they spend on tampax. loo seats, faux tudor beams, chimney sweeps, flat screen tellys, new kitchens, kiddles furniture. tesco food bills ans the rest could just as easily ensure many old and recently unemployed people actually survive next winter by being able to switch on more tjhan one bar of their electric fire….It not only stinks buit all parliamentarians have known it was wrong and until exposed have done nothing about it….indeed tried to prevent it entering the public domian.

    Julian Bray

  108. 304
    bentkopper says:

    They’re going after BBC expenses next. Free TV licences for all BBC workers on less than £1 million per year.

    Jeremy Pacman with hundreds of bath plugs and no bath.

    • 366
      bollox to politicians says:

      I’ve never had a tv licence, don’t see why I need one. Don’t watch Aljabeeba

  109. 306
    Dogger says:

    Think kindly now on poor Paul Boateng. He will probably wish that he and his nasty family hadn’t screwed up in Cape Town so spectacularly. Kicked out of the Governor’s mansion his sinecure lifestyle has been abruptly terminated due to his egregious behaviour and that of his wantonly vile wife.

    When he gets back to blighty he will find the gravy train half dismantled in the sidings. So, on to the EU then!

  110. 310
    eye-eye says:

    It all started when Blair made them take off their anoraks and start wearing suits and ties. Since then they have got above their station.

  111. 313
    Voice of the Resistance says:

    “Report benefit cheats… so we can pocket the cash for oursleves.”
    – Your MP

  112. 318
    Anonymous says:

    I smell the whiff of temptation coming from Woolas direction.

    Nappies and women’s clothes? A mistress and love child?

    Oohh Matron.

    • 335
      eye-eye says:

      Theyworkforyou.com

      Wollas expences of late

      Figures in brackets are ranks. Parliament’s explanatory notes.

      Additional Costs Allowance £23,083 (joint 1st) £22,110 (joint 1st) £20,766

  113. 323
    sukyspook says:

    How come none of these troughers have picked up swine flu – or was the swine flu another ‘convenient’ distraction….wot, oops, sorry – silly me, that’s a ‘conspiracy’….

    Who’s off on a jolly to Greece then – and from which ‘bench’ hmmmm?

  114. 326
    eye-eye says:

    Chief Crown Prosecutor already practicing his lines…….

    ” This prosecution would not be in the Public Interest” repeat 800 times (includes House of Lords)

    • 336
      semo says:

      EVERYBODY SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT THESE THEIVES TO THE POLICE.A TRUE ACT OF CITIZENSHIP

      • 339
        semo says:

        THIEVES EVEN

      • 386
        Dr Nuts says:

        I’m reporting my MP – Margaret Moran.

        Problem – I reported a drug deal going on outside my flat. 4 large bags white powder being exchanged at 21:30 at night. Result – Bedfordshire police didn’t bother! Must’ve been caster sugar!

        Police have been neutered!

  115. 338
    Gilly says:

    Now that the proverbial s**t has hit the fan on MPs expenses…. what about the same for local councils?

    I’m sure that the epithet ‘As above; so below’ is grounds for having the same level of transparency working in local government. When it takes four men to paint a bus-stop in Nottingham – something’s amiss!

    I wonder if Heather can start a campaign on THIS one!!!

    • 382
      Carter Fuck says:

      a

    • 383
      Carter Fuck says:

      And dont” forget the Lords.I already have Baronness Udders as a client…But i need dozens more please …

    • 406

      To correct you it actually takes two workpersons to conduct these works in Nottingham; of course we do need three administrators to initiate, check and approve the expenditure; a Health & Safety officer to ensure the risk is adequately managed; one Diversity Officer and an Assistant to ensure compliance with diversity issues; plus an onsite visit by a community nutritionist to discuss healthy food options with our workpersons as part of our “Five A Day” campaign.

      This was on a “good day” of course. On a bad day we get through another Chief Executive too here.

      All was going well until on the day, in error, our Community Football Task Force team called by and the two workpersons spent the rest of the allocated time playing football on the street.

      That is the only reason we had to call upon the two additional workpersons to attend and complete the job. By 4pm this was a priority because we had closed the city centre to traffic the night before to facilitate the said works to the bus stop and the resulting queue of traffic was affecting by this time rush hour on the M25.

      • 452
        fanny by gaslight says:

        I hope you used organic freetrade paint – otherwise you will have to do it all all again (having assembled a team of diversity officers, elfin safety operatives and hazardous substances removal executives to remove the old paint first).

  116. 343
    Lurking Spider says:

    5th Nov.
    Sorted. See you all there. brig your own gunpowder

    • 353
      semo says:

      30TH MAY SAT.BEFORE ELECTIONS PASS IT ROUND

    • 364
      Bewildebeest says:

      Like the idea of the 5th Nov. Very symbolic and very appropriate. Trouble is – I can’t wait that long !! Deffo needs to be before the troughers go on their summer hols. Sort it Guido. Er.. please.

  117. 344
    Lurking Spider says:

    bring^ (slaps typist)

  118. 347
    Here Come Da Judge says:

    Down

    Send them down….

  119. 348
    eye-eye says:

    Deep Throat said “Follow the Money”

    It’s bloody exhausting.

    • 453
      fanny by gaslight says:

      Yes, but even he would have baulked when he got to Prezza’s toilet.

  120. 349
    bollox to politicians says:

    Here lies a toppled god
    his fall was not a small one,
    he did but build his pedestal,
    a narrow and a tall one.

    • 372
      Mitch says:

      A Tleilaxu aphorism if I’m not mistaken. old Frank Herbert knew his politics.

      • 378
        bollox to politicians says:

        I thought it was a Bene Gesserit hymn to Paul Atriedes, but it’s a long time since I have read Dune.

  121. 354
    arthur says:

    “We are the cheapest corrupt nation on earth” BBC

  122. 355
    Phil Woolas, Very Important Government Minister says:

    My reputation has been damaged. I am considering consulting my lawyers but am unable to comment on whether the expense would be within the rules. I will not let this detract me from clamping down on immigration by letting in as much foreign filth as possible. Naturally, the Ghurkhas do not qualify.

    I am determined to maintain the standards and reputation of the Government and Parliament, as will all my colleagues. It is the right thing to do.

  123. 369
    eye-eye says:

    Can’t find out the ages of Woolas’s children. Presume they were at nappy age when the claim was made?

    • 375
      eye-eye says:

      Telegraph ” One receipt shows 10% staff discount”

      Does his wife work? etc. etc. ?

    • 427
      pigs in space says:

      According to the Telegraph, he bought panty liners, tampons and a lady’s blouse in a Tesco’s in Horsham, that’s in West Sussex. What was an Oldham MP doing down there. Bit out of his way for a shopping trip. And to think Winston Churchill used to be MP for Oldham.

      • 431
        Boris for President of UK says:

        I have never seen so many pigs flying all at one time…Quite surreal really…Makes me feel quite dizzy…How about another round Guido ?!

      • 459
        CB says:

        Horsham; visiting the in-laws? Where he got married.

      • 461
        Ben Elton says:

        Buying a ladies blouse, panty liners, and tampons?

    • 458
      CB says:

      Perhaps not; Joshua James born August 1993 and Jed Phillip born une 2002 seem to be the children. Tlot plickens

  124. 380
    The Beast of Clerkenwell says:

    Lock and load
    Stand by
    Stand by
    All of them up against a wall
    In the 1970′s Generals were seriously considering a coup against a Labour government ,they should do it now.
    The only reason that Turkey isnt a nutjob Islamic state is due to the army.
    These Honourable Hoons are traitors
    ALL of them every last one of them.

  125. 384
    Richard Wilson, Labour luvie actor says:

    ” I don’t belieeeeeeve it “

  126. 405
    Rt Hon Porky Pig MP (Bastard North) says:

    I have just swilled an excellent bottle of port (paid for by you). Earlier I had a very fine luncheon with an excellent Bordeaux (paid for by you). The taxi ride (paid for by you) to my beautiful London pied a terre (the second one paid for and furnished by you) was high lighted by my stopping to buy groceries, plasma screen tvs etc (paid for by you). my home is clean and secure becuase I have a contract cleaner and private security (paid for by you).

    I have a safe seat and I WILL be returned to parliamnet come the next election no matter what, because my constituents have always voted for my party and always will. What a wonderful system we have in this fine country, a bastion of decency an moral rectitude. A good day to you all ladies and gentlemen.

  127. 419
    Astonished, quite frankly says:

    Odd thing. A former colleague who WAS a civil servant got sacked for stealing her own pay. Her pay branch overpaid her, she queried it and was told it was in order. 6 months later she was told she was being investigated for obtaining that money by deception then sacked for Gross Misconduct. No police called, mind you. You’d think they would given the nature of the offence.

    This civil servant was also known among managers as a ‘trouble maker’ (what used to be called ‘asking questions about policy’) Great way to get rid of someone. Put money into their account then accuse them of stealing it.

  128. 433
    Chief Rebuttal Officer says:

    Please note I have changed my name…

    I am now the Chief Rebuttal Officer of England Wales and Europe…

    You can call me your holiness…

    Peter Mandelson

    PS I am just going to rebutt eveything you say…until I disappear up my own rebuttal…

  129. 439
    rt. hon .phil boots ( sleaseden central) says:

    Who are these ungrateful rabble; I spent a lifetime in student politics and local parish councils listening to plonkers moaning about their dustbins not being collected and petty crime such as random muggings to get where I am today. Don’t they realise such personal sacrifice deserves some reward.
    I have acted totally within the rules I helped write.Just stay at home as usual next election and let my brainwashed voting fodder; err I mean loyal supporters vote me back in.

    • 454
      fanny by gaslight says:

      Unfortunately for you, I am going to change my name by deed poll to Phil Boot, and stand as a Laber party candidate. As a gcse english marker, I am confident that the tosspot hoodies, that are your core support can’t read or spell well enough to tell the difference.

  130. 465

    Guido, are you hearing rumours that Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper are next to be exposed? Lots of noise in that area, and it couldn’t happen to a nicer couple.

  131. 466
    It all started in America you bastards!!!!! says:

    For those that have a fucking expense cheating Liebour MP. You might want to place your order now.

    google “piano wire”

  132. 468

    It’s the Chipmunk’s turn – see here Why Hazel Blears Must Quit. Oh dear.

  133. 469
    Doctor Mick says:

    A whole Pandora’s Box has been opened here. It is beginning to spread like swine flu and I’ll bet, before long, we shall be seeing similar popular outpourings of resentment in the EU and beyond. Who knows where it will all end!

    My God, it all started over a nudged spilling of some Gui­nness. What the hell would have happened if McBride had knocked the whole pint onto the floor? Armaggedon, I shouldn’t wonder.

  134. 470
    The Ghost of Christmas Past says:

    I know of another loose collection of suited individuals who pass themselves off as Men of Honour.

    Theyre no different to this shower of bastards who have the gall to call themselves “honourable”, what an insult to the term.

    If any of them have even a modicum of morality left in them id expect them to do something radical, like apologise, or resign, or maybe Sepuku.
    I dont hold out any great hopes of seeing an “honourable” member actually doing anything of honourable worth and i remain unimpressed by their pathetic bleating chorus of ” we aint done nuffin wrong Meester”.
    The real truth of the matter is they know exactly what theyve done wrong, they know we know theyve done wrong but they simply dont care.
    Its two fingers up to the voting public and bend over we need to ream you some more.

    I propose a ducking stool in parliament square for the worst of them and a set of stocks for the lower orders of the thieving scum.
    Oh what an interesting week in politics thatd be.

    • 471
      The Ghost of Christmas Past says:

      And to think, we have men dying in Iraq and Afghanistan for 50 quid a day with substandard equipment and nothing but shite treatment by the MOD all the way.

      AWhlst back in old blighted Blighty, a bunch of bastards, filthy, rotten, excreta with King Turd Brown ( an apt name) shitting on everyone underneath.
      Not for very much longer Mr Fat Ex-”Chancer” of the exchequer.

      Excise them all, cancers can only be cut out.

  135. 472
    It all started in America you bastards!!!!! says:

    Joanna lumley should be in charge of head severing and castration at the Commons.

  136. 473
    Mr Christopher says:

    The offence of ‘obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception’ was repealed in the Fraud Act 2006, and has been reclassified as fraud.

  137. 487
    killemallletgodsortemout says:

    Is that you at 18 seconds, Guido, supping on a drop of porter? Just as the chap says “We’re closing in with every means at our disposal?”



The Iranian Model is Hitler | Lawrence J. Haas
No.10′s Andrew Cooper Should Look at this Poll | Douglas Carswell
Livingstone Has Form on Homophobia | ConservativeHome
Investors HBack Over RBS Meddling | CityAM
Riddled With It | Pink News
I Went Mad in the Seventies | Ken
Guy Newsroom Splits | Indy
Polly’s Voodoo Polling | UK Polling Report
Labour SpAd Backs the Bill | Mark Wallace
Guido Goes for the Lobby | Press Gazette

Previously Seen


Peter Botting


Max Clifford says…

“Most people want to read nasty things about people, not nice things.”



DisgustedOfMitcham2 says:

Maybe if they really wanted to “decontaminate the Labour brand” with business people, they shouldn’t have totally buggered up the economy?

Just a thought.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives








RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads