The much less publicised pro-Trump petition has now crossed the 100,000 threshold required for a parliamentary debate.

They will both be debated on February 20…

Parliament’s petition website is one year old today. The site, aimed at encouraging ordinary members of the British public to have a say in the workings of Parliament, has received 19,018 petitions since it’s inception. Of these 258 have reached the 10,000 signatures required to trigger a response from the government (1.36% ). Just 30 have reached the required 100,000 signatures or more to be debated in Parliament (after approval from the Petitions Committee, who blocked votes of no confidence in David Cameron and a debate to hold a 2016 General Election).

Of these 30, Guido Data can reveal that just four could be said arguably to have been followed by policies, of which only two can be said to have actually effected the government’s decision. Of these two are a petition to allow more refugees into the UK (this followed the shocking images of a drowned migrant child last summer, arguably receiving wider popular support), and another to hold a debate on a vote of no confidence in Jeremy Hunt – something the petition automatically achieved by gaining over 100,000 signatures. In other words, just 0.01% of all petitions lodged can actually be said to have affected the government’s policy. So much for direct democracy…

Everyone is getting very excited about a government e-petition calling for Donald Trump to be banned from the UK. As we go to pixel it has amassed 430,000 signatures:

Just one problem for the ban-happy right-on crowd. They are having to tip toe around the other leading petition on the government’s e-petition website, which has around ten thousand signatures more:

Guido agrees with neither.