Someone was going to do it. Last night Piers Morgan named King Charles and Princess Kate as the two royals Meghan Markle accused of being “concerned” about the skin colour of her child with Harry. The names were “mistakenly” present in the Dutch version of Omid Scobie’s new book. If the Dutch get to know, so should we…
Prince Harry has been given the go ahead to press on with suing the The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday over privacy claims. The Mail wanted to block the case, denying the claims as “preposterous smears“. Along with the Duke of Sussex, the newspaper group faces multiple claims of “gross breaches of privacy” from six other high profile celebrities such as Sir Elton John. Allegations include bugging devices in cars, listening into phone calls and dishonestly obtaining medical and financial information. The judge has ruled the claims can move forward, setting the stage for a future court hearing…
Britain’s former US Ambassador Kim Darroch, a man best known for losing his job as a result of speaking his mind too much, has voiced his disapproval at Prince Harry’s candid admission about the number of Taliban fighters he killed in Afghanistan. Among the barrage of jaw-dropping, headline-grabbing confessions from his forthcoming autobiography, Prince Harry openly confirms he shot dead 25 Taliban combatants. Immediately sparking security concerns…
The new king of progressive causes writes “You can’t kill people if you see them as people” so he regarded them as “chess pieces removed from the board . . . bad guys eliminated”.
This morning Lord Darroch told Sky that had he been advising Harry, “I would have advised against the kind of detail that he goes into there… I personally wouldn’t have gone there.” If anyone should be advising Prince Harry on candour, it’s the former US ambassador who resigned after writing cables describing the US government as “inept” and “uniquely dysfunctional”…
Responding to Prince Harry’s latest trailed interview, Tory MP Tim Loughton simply tells the prince:
“Just shut the f*** up”
No-one in Britain, with the volcanic exception of Piers Morgan, is more exercised by the Harry and Meghan drama than Conservative MP Bob Seely. Having first fumed to Tom Newton Dunn on December 1, claiming he’d table a Private Member’s Bill to strip the pair of their titles if he “had the time“, Seely has now finally seen enough. In the eight days since, he’s found the time after all…
Seely told Dan Wootton his cunning plan on GB News:
“… What we’ve found is a reasonably obscure 1917 bill called the Royal Titles Bill, and we’re going to bring in – potentially – an amendment to that. And that Bill was brought in in 1917 to strip various aristocrats [of their titles] in this country, members of the royal family, who were siding with the Germans in World War One.”
He’s hoping to table the amendment early next year. It would certainly gain the Royal Assent in quick time – and save Harry’s father the nuisance of doing the job himself…
Prince Harry and Meghan have once again broken with royal rules to tell voters to “reject hate speech” at the “most important election of our lifetime”. Filmed in the garden of their $14 million mansion in California, the royal Santa Barbara couple said that while Prince Harry can’t vote, they will work to “reimagine the world around us” and “build worlds of compassion”. Guido can’t imagine the California-based millionaire couple will do much to swing votes in the rust-belt…
