The Twitterati reaction is mixed:
Perhaps the full speech will be better but Jarvis extracts have only deepened the despair of some MPs.
— Stephen Bush (@stephenkb) March 10, 2016
Dan Jarvis is probably the best hope Labour has for 2020. The Corbyn experiment was doomed from the start.
— James (@jpick2012) March 10, 2016
I'm a Barnsley girl so this whole Dan Jarvis/ Jeremy Corbin divide is a killer
— Kariss (@kariss_leigh) March 10, 2016
Dan Jarvis shits warheads pass it on.
— Paddy Sisyphus (@PaddySisyphus) March 10, 2016
If you saw a transcript of this Dan Jarvis speech you'd think it was Tony Blair wouldn't you? Same old hollow meaningless phrases.
— David Wilkinson (@ManLikeCorbyn) March 10, 2016
Dan Jarvis is just Andy Burnham with a pair of khaki trousers.
— SL (@SaneLynch) March 10, 2016
Convinced if Dan Jarvis was leader that PMQs would consist of a 1000 yard stare and only the question "have you ever killed a man David?"
— Benjamin Cook (@bd_cook) March 10, 2016
Lab's latest hope Dan Jarvis: 'We must be tough on inequality + causes of inequality.' Empty cliches like this part of the reason Corbyn won
— Jason Groves (@JasonGroves1) March 10, 2016
Dan Jarvis is coming across like someone who tells girls that he's a nice guy.
— Patrick Brusnahan (@patbrusnahan) March 10, 2016
Jarvis speech ends. He didn't mention Corbyn.
— George Eaton (@georgeeaton) March 10, 2016