The Twitterati reaction is mixed:

Perhaps the full speech will be better but Jarvis extracts have only deepened the despair of some MPs.

— Stephen Bush (@stephenkb) March 10, 2016

It stinks that Dan Jarvis has received Hedge funds & is using his time2make personal attacks on Corbyn.Self-interest B4 Party@jeremycorbyn

— Christina (@55krissi55) March 10, 2016

Dan Jarvis is probably the best hope Labour has for 2020. The Corbyn experiment was doomed from the start.

— James (@jpick2012) March 10, 2016

I'm a Barnsley girl so this whole Dan Jarvis/ Jeremy Corbin divide is a killer

— Kariss (@kariss_leigh) March 10, 2016

Dan Jarvis shits warheads pass it on.

— Paddy Sisyphus (@PaddySisyphus) March 10, 2016

If you saw a transcript of this Dan Jarvis speech you'd think it was Tony Blair wouldn't you? Same old hollow meaningless phrases.

— David Wilkinson (@ManLikeCorbyn) March 10, 2016

Dan Jarvis is just Andy Burnham with a pair of khaki trousers.

— SL (@SaneLynch) March 10, 2016

Convinced if Dan Jarvis was leader that PMQs would consist of a 1000 yard stare and only the question "have you ever killed a man David?"

— Benjamin Cook (@bd_cook) March 10, 2016

Lab's latest hope Dan Jarvis: 'We must be tough on inequality + causes of inequality.' Empty cliches like this part of the reason Corbyn won

— Jason Groves (@JasonGroves1) March 10, 2016

Dan Jarvis is coming across like someone who tells girls that he's a nice guy.

— Patrick Brusnahan (@patbrusnahan) March 10, 2016

Jarvis speech ends. He didn't mention Corbyn.

— George Eaton (@georgeeaton) March 10, 2016