The Commons is currently debating whether or not the Labour leadership are “terrorist sympathisers”. Doesn’t this just remind everyone that Corbyn and McDonnell actually are terrorist sympathisers?

Oh FFS. Labour need to let go of how offended they are and get on with talking about the issue at hand.

— fleetstreetfox (@fleetstreetfox) December 2, 2015

And another Labour MP demands an apology. Maybe we will need a two-day debate after all. The second day can be about Syria

— Michael Deacon (@MichaelPDeacon) December 2, 2015

Cameron very clear. Does not believe those who vote against are terrorist sympathisers. Opponents need to get onto substance of case.

— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) December 2, 2015

Really confused by this terrorist sympathiser stuff. Some of those opposing are literally terrorist sympathisers, right?

— Tom Cheshire (@chesh) December 2, 2015

Cameron's use of 'terrorist sympathisers' was a mistake but these repeated interventions are demeaning parliament given subject under debate

— Ian Birrell (@ianbirrell) December 2, 2015

God Cameron's remark was daft but this is the Commons at it's worst. Political game-playing when a serious issue is at stake.

— Sam Freedman (@Samfr) December 2, 2015

Cameron refuses to apologise for calling those who will vote against tonight "a bunch of terrorist sympathisers" #DontBombSyria

— Emily Thornberry (@EmilyThornberry) December 2, 2015

I have made many stupid mistakes in my life but voting for Emily Thornberry is the worst

— Nick Cohen (@NickCohen4) December 2, 2015

"We've only got a single day to debate air strikes. Let's waste it talking about personal insults and what name the terrorists should have"

— Michael Deacon (@MichaelPDeacon) December 2, 2015

They might get round to discussing the war some time this evening…