On 3 November 2014, not even twelve months ago, Peter Hain told his constituents he believed the second chamber should be elected:
“The Lords are an archaic anomaly which fuels disillusionment with British politics. It exists purely on a democratic deficit which has been allowed to evolve unchecked for centuries… the fact is that people are fed up with an out-of-touch political class and the growing sense that Westminster is failing us all.”
Yesterday, he became Lord Hain of Neath, writing in the Guardian that “it wasn’t an easy decision“, it had required “considerable thought“, but he concluded that “more peers in favour of reform are crucially important“.
What was it about the £300-a-day attendance allowance that changed his mind?
Comments are closed