Awkward, via PA:
Iain Duncan Smith had his official credit card suspended after running up more than £1,000 in expenses debts, it can be revealed.
The Work and Pensions Secretary was among more a dozen MPs subject to action by the Commons watchdog after failing to show spending was valid.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) issues MPs with credit cards for to pay for items such as travel and accommodation.
The politicians then have to prove the spending was genuine by the end of the month, or they build up debts to the watchdog.
What would the DWP have to say about such a flagrant breach of the rules?
- 3 categories of sanction – ‘higher’, ‘intermediate’ and ‘lower’ – depending on the nature of the offence
Seems pretty serious: Higher.
- different levels of sanction for first, second and third offences
Hardly the first time that the words ‘IDS’ and ‘expenses’ have been heard in the same sentence…
Certainly a case for suspending hand outs.
UPDATE: Team IDS get in touch:
“Iain has not had his card suspended. IPSA have confirmed twice in writing that this issue was an error on their part. To be clear no money is owed”
Yet IPSA still insist the credit card was switched off and that they stand by their original claim entirely. So who’s telling the truth?