Syria: Where We Stand This Morning

This is where we stand this morning. Last night the PM and President Obama agreed in a phone call that there is “no doubt” that the Assad regime was responsible for the chemical weapons attacks in Syria last week. The US is set to release a declassified intelligence report that they say contains proof. This position, attributing responsibility to Assad, is accepted by the Arab League. The chief of defence staff Sir Nick Houghton is meeting with the National Security Council today to discuss military targets.

David Cameron last night said Britain “cannot stand idly by”, Nick Clegg says a failure to act would “set a very dangerous precedent”. Ed Miliband will consider supporting legal, limited action. William Hague outlines the case for intervention in today’s Telegraph:

“We cannot allow the use of chemical weapons in the 21st century to go unchallenged. That would send a signal to the Syrian regime that they will never face any consequences for their actions, no matter how barbarous. It would make further chemical attacks in Syria much more likely, and also increase the risk that these weapons could fall into the wrong hands in the future… Tomorrow, Parliament will have the opportunity to debate these issues, and to make its views known. This is a moment of grave danger for the people of Syria, a moment of truth for democratic nations to live up to their values, and a weighty test of the international community. The way ahead will not be without risks, but the risks of doing nothing are greater.”

The Sun has the first polling on Syria since last week’s attacks. With UKIP the only party against intervention, the findings are unsurprising:

Though then again Cameron was never doing this for the votes. Tough but necessary foreign policy interventions are never popular. Today MPs are flying back from their holidays and travelling to Westminster for tomorrow’s debate. There is only one story for the next few days…

Seen Elsewhere

Tip offs: 0709 284 0531

Quote of the Day

In response to the news that Emily Thornberry described the Lib Dems as “like the Taliban” over their new revoke Article 50 Brexit policy, the former Lib Dem leader responded:

“Come on Emily, if we really were like a Middle East terrorist group, don’t you think Jeremy would’ve invited us to a conference fringe meeting before now?”


Guidogram: Sign up

Subscribe to the most succinct 7 days a week daily email read by thousands of Westminster insiders.
Crowdfund Libertarian Music Video Crowdfund Libertarian Music Video