Labour peer Jim Knight could be in hot water over his apparent failure to disclose who funded a recent trip to the US to the Register of Lords’ Interests. Lord Knight spent the week travelling around Tennessee, revealing on his blog that he funded “most” of the trip:

Peers are required to disclose details of who funds their trips abroad, yet there is nothing on record relating to Lord Knight’s stateside excursion. If he funded “most” of the cost, who paid for the rest and why wasn’t it declared?