Wonks Do the Numbers : Peerage Price Rises Lower than Inflation

Propeller-Head Wonk Watch: The Bow Group has done some research which they have passed on to Scotland Yard to give to the CPS. Chris Philip has looked into the correlation between large donations to the Labour Party and the receipt of honours. Blair has created 292 peers (yes, his watch has seen the creation of more unelected Labour peers than elected Labour MPs). From the number crunching the Bow Group has worked out the list price:

The correlation between making large donations to the Labour Party and receiving an honour is extraordinary. Statistical analysis shows that 58.54% of all donors giving more than £50,000 to the Labour Party receive an honour. This compares to just 0.035% of non-donors. Large Labour Party donors are 1,657 times more likely to receive an honour than a non-donor and 6,969 times more likely to receive a peerage. It is almost impossible to avoid the conclusion that the Labour Party has been selling honours, including places in the House of Lords. An analysis of all donations over £50,000 since 2001 reveals that Honour certainly has its price. We publish below the average amount donated by the recipients of various honours – an “Honours Price List”. Those receiving a Peerage have given £1.07 million on average, and a Knighthood £747,000… Compared to the prices Lloyd George was charging, Labour is currently charging less for peerages, but more for OBEs. In today’s money, Lloyd George charged £1.9m million for a peerage, and just £3,800 for an OBE.

The Bow Group compared the prices which the Labour Party appears to be charging to those charged by Maundy Gregory, Lloyd George’s fixer, in the 1920s. They then adjusted these for inflation between 1922 and 2006. In 1922, a Peerage cost £50,000, and Knighthood £15,000. In today’s money, this works out at £1.9m for a peerage, £571,000 for a Knighthood. Compared to Lloyd George, Labour today charge less for a peerage.

Tip offs: 0709 284 0531

Quote of the Day

Dominic Raab wrote in his letter of resignation…

“This is, at its heart, a matter of public trust,” he told the PM, concluding: “I cannot reconcile the terms of the proposed deal with the promises we made to the country in our manifesto at the last election… I believe that the regulatory regime proposed for Northern Ireland presents a very real threat to the integrity of the United Kingdom. I cannot support an indefinite backstop arrangement, where the EU holds a veto over our ability to exit…”


Guidogram: Sign up

Subscribe to the most succinct 7 days a week daily email read by thousands of Westminster insiders.