April 22nd, 2014

Peter Lilley Fails to Declare Little List of Energy Interests

Number 10 policy board adviser Peter Lilley regularly bigs up big oil in speeches to parliament, bemoaning climate change laws that “require us to replace cheap fossil fuels with energy sources that are at least twice as expensive and less reliable” last September and then going after vested interests in November:

“Politicians and environmental campaigners have a vested interest in fanning that suspicion to divert attention from the increases in the cost of energy that the political elite are planning in the move to increasingly costly renewables, with the added costs that they impose on the transmission network.”

What Lilley didn’t mention on either occasion was his own vested interest as the £47,000-a-year non-executive director of Tethys Petroleum Limited, an oil and gas exploration company based in Central Asia. He is also a director of Facor Energy Limited, a new shell company which is yet to begin trading. Considering he’s been an MP for nearly 31 years, he should probably know better than to breach the members’ code of conduct by failing to declare an interest…


97 Comments

  1. 1
    Free Market says:

    Sack him. Sleezy oligarchist.

    Like

    • 16
      love, like, be nuce to me. says:

      what is on ice is the noose made of garlands.
      but there is a stirring. thy key is yu.
      forget the lock. but the key is also restricted so….
      be nice to you,

      Like

    • 74
      The Borg says:

      Randomly he visited my old school back in the 90s, a friend of mine had an A4 sheet of paper with “I have no willy” written on it whilst folded he asked Mr Lilley for an autograph.

      Oh did we laugh! It was displayed in our common room for many a month.

      Like

    • 84
      The Growler says:

      You could say he has been a Silly Lilley. What a surname for a guy to have.

      Like

      • 89
        broderick crawford says:

        Oh I don t know so much — probably the Lilley of Lilley and Skinner , the erstwhile shoe emporium . Old money !!

        Like

    • 87
      Colonel Mustard says:

      He was an Oil Analyst, and a very good one (i.e. accurate predictions), before he became an MP.

      Like

      • 90
        broderick crawford says:

        Yes I was in the DTI when he was S.O.S.

        a lean mean calculating machine who with Nick Ridley made a fairly

        shrewd team , until Ridley had to depart .

        Like

      • 97
        Green or Beijing Smog - You Decide says:

        No, conflict of interest there, then.

        The future lies with green energy as is becoming clearer by the day. Wind energy becomes cheaper each year, the problem of energy storage is being solved and the price of solar energy is plummeting.

        Germany will be laughing at us in a few years as we remain saddled with a super-expensive nuclear industry.

        Like

    • 88
      Ann Frank's Drum-kit says:

      Oil be seein ya!

      Like

  2. 2
    ned ludd says:

    Cot a wunt

    Like

  3. 3
    C O (Ξ7q1) says:

    Central As!an Oil Interests… de-facto R’ussian controlled.

    Like

  4. 4
    Tim Yo-Yo says:

    A clash of interests is outrageous!

    Like

  5. 5
    British Jobs for British Workers says:

    Tethys is listed in Toronto. This scumbag isn’t even supporting a British company.

    Like

    • 52
      David Cameron that famous defender of Christians says:

      Britains….

      hahahahahhhhaaaaaa haaaaa haahahaaaaa Britians are plebs.

      Unless you went to Eton you don’t deserve any rights

      Like

  6. 6
    Greenpiss says:

    Environmentalists are sponsored by big government.The biggest big business ever invented.

    Like

  7. 7
    Dickhead politician says:

    Fossil fuels aren’t cheap. The clue is in the word “fossil”. Using them quite literally will cost the planet.

    Like

  8. 8
    Swivel eyed loon says:

    Vote ukip

    Like

    • 59
      David Cameron that famous defender of Christians says:

      No, pleeeeease vote for meeee….

      I know my attempts at religious electioneering are truly despicable and unhelpfully shine a spotlight on how easily I will lie to the public, again, again and again.

      But you’ve seen the ease with which I can speak of my ‘Christian values’ (even though I don’t really know what that means… is it like being a member of an Oxbridge drinking club or a boarding school ‘house’..?!).

      I know it looks like my true feelings are utter contempt for Christians in the UK, but I am really, really, truly desperate..

      Honestly, I will do or say anything, to cling onto power, even if that means I have to pretend to be a Christian and a man of faith.

      Like

    • 79
      Apthorpe says:

      Yes simply vote UKIP in May, you have nothing to lose (all MEPS are a waste of space) but at least you’ll send a very clear message to the Dave the Heathite and Millibean the LSE Revolutionary. Namely that neither of them are fit for the job of running the country. In the case of Dave you just might put enough pressure on the eternal turner to come up with a policy on Europe to go into the manifesto that he can’t back out of! You never know and well worth the laugh of seeing them all running around.

      Like

  9. 9
    Axe The Telly Tax & Religion & Kill All Eco-loons says:

    You’d have a point if he was lobbying for more expensive energy as the eco-loons are, but he isn’t.

    There is no viable or cheaper alternative to oil & gas.

    Like

    • 23
      jgm2 says:

      Methane hydrate is looking very promising. More energy reserves than all the rest of the world’s oil, coal and gas put together.

      Like

      • 40
        Axe The Telly Tax & Religion & Kill All Eco-loons says:

        They’ve been saying the same thing about nuclear fusion since the 1950s.

        Like

  10. 11
    Taxfodder says:

    You would think he could do his paperwork correctly after all Brussels runs the country for him and his chums, too busy counting fat profits I expect.

    Still not to worry too much about a little accounting failure….although one can’t help thinking it must be a really big carpet considering all the muck swept under there…..

    Like

  11. 12
    fedz says:

    This is why he and many others go into politics! and the real reason for the privatizations.

    Like

  12. 13
    B. Zyklon says:

    Isn’t he a ‘friend’ of Michael Portillo?

    Like

  13. 14
    D Laws says:

    British politics. Rotten to the core.

    Like

    • 39
      Lord Stansted says:

      Vote UKIP to give the bastards a shock they wont forget in a hurry.

      Like

      • 64
        David Cameron that famous defender of Christians says:

        Oh God no….please vote for meeeeeeeee !

        (see that I got another reference to God in there…I am a Christian)

        Like

  14. 15
    Greenpiss says:

    Demolish all old houses irrespective of condition and replace them with energy efficient tetra pack type dwellings.
    I suggest Notting Hill and Primrose hill be first on the list for development.

    Like

    • 18
      British Jobs for British Workers says:

      I think we should put up a twenty story towerblock right in front of David Cameron’s gaff in the Cotswolds. With a neon-lit revolving pizza parlour on the top to creat some local jobs.

      Like

  15. 17

    Flat Earther in pocket of oil industry?

    I’m shocked I tell you, shocked.

    Like

    • 30
      Axe The Telly Tax & Religion & Kill All Eco-loons says:

      Europe doesn’t need any of that nasty smelly oil & gas.

      So when that nasty Mr. Putin cuts off the supply, they will laugh at him and use windmills & solar panels instead.

      Like

    • 47
      Flat Earther says:

      I would take trying to reduce Britain’s carbon footprint a little more seriously if the politicians did.
      Increasing the countries population and then having to build over the countryside to house them is not good for the environment nor is it sustainable.
      Being more enlightened than me maybe you should be first to bugger off to Africa to make some space.

      Like

    • 58
      táxpáyér says:

      Sorry Jimmy, You’re the economic creationist!

      Like

  16. 20
    I've got a little list says:

    £47k for a non-exec role of some tin-pot oiler. Tasty work!

    Like

  17. 21
    nell says:

    Does he do anything useful for that £47k a year ? Ifso I think we should know about it.

    Like

  18. 22
    Curious says:

    Is he “One of Us”? A Portillista Willybum?

    Like

    • 27
      Toxic Tories for Landowning Spongers, Parasites, Criminals, Expenses Fraudsters, Traitors, Peedos, & says:

      Yes, he’s one of ‘you’

      Like

  19. 24
    David Cameron and George Osborne are a pair of deceitful cunts says:

    1. In April 2014, Britain’s economic output – gross domestic product (GDP) – has yet to return to pre-2008 levels.

    2. Britain’s recovery lags behind that in the US and Germany.

    3. Britain’s recovery is slower than that which followed the Great Depression of the 1930s.

    4. Except for the rich elite, living standards are down.

    At the time of the next UK election most people will be worse off than they were before the current Conservative government came to power.

    5. Paul Krugman, the Nobel prize-winning US economist, said: “So the UK government did a lot of austerity, then stopped doing more…”

    That is because the austerity was not working.

    6. Britain’s recovery is now based on rising property prices in London and more consumer debt.

    It is not based on increasing exports and increasing investment

    Like

  20. 25
    David Cameron and George Osborne are a pair of deceitful cunts says:

    1. In April 2014, Britain’s economic output – gross domestic product (GDP) – has yet to return to pre-2008 levels.

    2. Britain’s recovery lags behind that in the US and Germany.

    3. Britain’s recovery is slower than that which followed the Great Depression of the 1930s.

    4. Except for the rich elite, living standards are down.

    At the time of the next UK election most people will be worse off than they were before the current Conservative government came to power.

    5. P@ul Krugman, the Nobel prize-winning US economist, said: “So the UK government did a lot of austerity, then stopped doing more…”

    That is because the austerity was not working.

    6. Britain’s recovery is now based on rising property prices in London and more consumer debt.

    It is not based on increasing exports and increasing investment

    Like

    • 33
      jgm2 says:

      And Labour’s ‘end’ to recession was based on borrowing 180bn quid in a single year and printing another 300bn quid and pissing it into the economy.

      Not what you’d call a ‘recovery’ based on increasing exports or investments either.

      Was it?

      Like

      • 37
        M103 says:

        Was that not to bail out the banks?

        Like

      • 51
        C.O.Jones says:

        That £180B was well spent, we achieved 0.1% growth with that (that’s if the figures are to be believed).

        Like

        • 54
          jgm2 says:

          Yep. 0.1% ‘growth’ and not a single public sector worker lost their job. In fact they were still getting pay-rises. Yet another poisoned well left by the Maximum Imbecile.

          Sheer scorched Earth economics.

          Like

    • 60

      Krugman is a one-trick pony. Keynes himself famously said that when the facts changed, he changed his mind. Krugman doesn’t use Keynes’ theory to adapt to modern conditions, he worships at the Alter of a Keynesian Dogma the great man never intended. Spending America’s way out of a recession brought about by excessive spending hasn’t worked very well, has it? Blaming the Coalition for the aftermath of Gordon’s Bust and Bust economic policy merely underlines your economic illiteracy. As to Nobel prizes, he joins Al Gore, the IPCC and the Kenyan community organiser as worthless recipients of a once-great honour.

      Like

    • 61
      táxpáyér says:

      GDP is a measure of debt (i.e. how much we pay the bankster classes).

      Like

      • 94
        broderick crawford says:

        What i really would like to know is :

        at which point will the incumbent govt. of the day physically run out of money to pay benefits , pensions and infrastructure funding .

        In other words when will allpeople on state fixed incomes suddenly see their income stream dissapear and ergo are subsequently forced to beg borrow cheat steal annd eeven kill for the basic subsistance of life ?

        Alternatively if it keeps printing increasingly worthless fiat money unbacked bygold orother r tangible collateral when will trust in that money reach nil such that even if disbursed to the pleberiat it is seen as worthless and refused by all, leading to the same outcome as above ?

        Like

  21. 28
    jgm2 says:

    The worst bit is that while what he says about the insanity of paying double the price for inefficient sources of energy is perfectly true the chances are that if he wasn’t being paid by the oil industry he’d just keep his gob shut and go along with all this green horseshit like so many of the rest of them do.

    He shouldn’t need to be personally financially motivated to tell the fucking truth.

    Like

  22. 34
    M103 says:

    Can we have the crosshairs, Guido, just to prove your heart is really in it?

    Like

  23. 35
    non taxable pikey says:

    Clear slipped his mind. Will he be the first trougher to plead Alzheimer’s.

    Like

  24. 38

    Lilley is one of the few MP’s who has the education and the guts to call CO2-led warming for the scam it is. Now of course, the scammers can discount everything he says. Muppet.

    Like

  25. 65
    Hypocrisy Watch says:

    …and the fracking c’unt had the chutzpah to have a spat with Tim Yeo at an science and climate change select committee a short while back!

    MPs Tim Yeo and Peter Lilley in climate committee clash

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-26133916

    [quote]
    he row started after Peter Lilley suggested a leading scientist had given “irrelevant answers” about calculating future global temperature changes.

    But his colleague, Tim Yeo, disagreed and said Dr Emily Shuckburgh had given a “thorough and detailed” response.

    Asked by Mr Yeo to curtail questioning on the issue, Mr Lilley said this was “absolutely disgraceful”.
    [unquote]

    Like

    • 68
      jgm2 says:

      Lilley was dead right though. Yeo was just shielding the dissembling Shuckburgh for being totally dismantled.

      And we know what Yeo’s motivation was too. Money from the green machine.

      Like

  26. 69
    Blue Peter Goldfish says:

    Ed Miliband wants loads more onshore wind farms to be built all over the countryside; “Nihk is ur duty to swave the Planet” his wife Baroness Justine specialises in Law, advising companies on how to get planning permissions past local authorities for, well I never!: Onshore Wind Turbines.

    Like

  27. 71
    what a gay dave says:

    Go peter – you make as much money as you can

    Like

  28. 76
    Anonymous says:

    TWAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like

  29. 78
    Sir Mary Flappes says:

    Mr Lilley must be brought before the House and made to do The Chicken.
    He should then resign and retreat to contemplate his Seppuku Haiku.

    Like

  30. 86
    catesby says:

    Shame really he’s one of the few worthy tories these days.

    Like

  31. 96

    Yawn. This has been known to all sides of the “climate debate” for years. Boring!

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

Who Is Steering Labour’s Strategy? | Ballot Box
Greens are UKIP for Young People | Telegraph
Short-Termism of CCHQ | ConHome
May Aide: CCHQ Are Being Misleading | Telegraph
Tories Planning For Second Election | Guardian
We Are Losing Cyber War | Fraser Nelson
Osborne Aide Lands Pay Rise | Mirror
The Sick Of It | Sun
UKIP MEP’s Welfare Hypocrisy | Channel 4
Rise of Angela Merkel | New Yorker
May SpAd Removed From Candidates List | ConHome


Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


The Economist asks Tony Blair about Wendi Deng:

“Mr Blair roundly denies any impropriety. Asked whether he was (at least) careless about his reputation, he says calmly that it is “not something I will ever talk about—I haven’t and I won’t”, and then bangs his coffee cup so loudly into its saucer that it spills and everyone in the room jumps. But did he find himself in a tangle over his friendship with Ms Deng? A large, dark pool of sweat has suddenly appeared under his armpit, spreading across an expensive blue shirt. Even Mr Blair’s close friends acknowledge that the saga damaged him—not least financially, since Mr Murdoch stopped contributing to Mr Blair’s faith foundation and cut him off from other friendly donors in America.”


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,641 other followers