February 16th, 2014

Quote of the Day

Ayn Rand reminds us…

“Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).”


15 Comments

  1. 1
    Lord Bumwatch says:

    Great in theory!

    Like

  2. 2
    Blowing Whistles says:

    They are fine words but did she have any idea of the barbaric and duplicitous activities of many who surrounded her, and wasn’t it rather easy to hide hidden agendas back then?

    Like

  3. 3
    Wounded Cadger says:

    Yep, the basis of the EU…

    Like

  4. 4
    JadedJean2 says:

    Ayn Rand was just another libertarian J’ewish anarchist. Which group has done rather well out of peddling the rights of the minority above the majority? Why is it allways about the rights of the imdindividual, what about the responsibilities of the individual to the group? This is at heart why most libertarian anarchists ate truly sad and lonely people.

    Like

    • 6

      …what about the responsibilities of the individual to the group?

      OK let’s look at that. Pick Galileo Galilei for example. The only group which counted then was the Holy See of the Roman Catholic Church. His Copernican beliefs, his theory of Tides and his heliocentrism especially were pronounced as heretical and he spent his life under house arrest having been forced to publicly recant what he continued to hold to be true. The inquisition even forced him to remove any reference to tides.

      This is what you get if you follow groupthink. An utter perversion of truth and prevention of real progress.

      One may argue that Galileo was not right in every respect. Others refined his thoughts. But his work opened up the world as we know it today. It has now even been praised by the same Catholic Church which branded him as a heretic, but four centuries too late!

      Most advances in science have been made by individuals going against the prevailing groupthink. Give me the choice and I will prefer the individual every time. In fact without individual free thinkers, there would be no government, parliament, public servants, quangos, corporations, banks, religions – not even the EU. Without individuals, they would all be nothing.

      If that makes these individuals sad and lonely people in your book, I can only respond with: So what?

      Like

  5. 5
    tin foil top hat says:

    define “rights”.

    the EU has some pretty loony ideas on that front.

    Like

  6. 7
    U K I P P E R S says:

    In before the saddos try and do a hatchet job on her, yes because we all have rich friends we can sponge off for most of our lives like Karl ‘China is an anamoly’ Marx

    Like

  7. 8
  8. 9

    26% of Americans appear to believe that the sun orbits the earth.

    The same as the proportion of Brits who think a Labour government would be the best at managing the UK’s finances.

    Like

  9. 11
    gerrydorrian66 says:

    Maybe good in theory, but what happens when a minority decides it has abrogated the rights of the majority? (eg Eurocrats, jihadis, etc)

    Like

  10. 12

    Lotawords smart words. The individual is the smallest minority and he/she gets arse kicked.

    Like

  11. 13
    harleyrider1778 says:

    9th amendment

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people

    Like

  12. 14
    harleyrider1778 says:

    PUBLIC HOUSING SMOKING: A bill that would ban smoking in and near public housing under penalty of eviction for a third offense (SB 651, SD1) goes before a joint committee Thursday. The debate pits public health advocates against the real-world prospect of evicting older or lower-income people from their homes for lighting up. – See more at: http://westhawaiitoday.com/news/state-wire/lawmakers-take-smoking-cramming-other-bills#sthash.QyDR6Ruh.dpuf

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

How Avoidable Scandals Destroy Stupid Politicians | Alex Wickham
UKIP Mosque Confusion | The Week
Let’s Ban the Word Internet | Padraig Reidy
Are the Broadcasters Ready For the Election? | Specccie
Moral Bankruptcy of the BBC | David Keighley
UKIP’s ‘Starsky and Hutch’ | Total Politics
Innocent Sun Journo Just Doing Her Job | Sun
Boris Sent Up North | Times
The Only Way to Mend the EU | Leo McKinstry
Northern Labour Tearing Party Apart | David Aaronovitch
Osborne is Son of Brown | Peter Oborne


Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


Tony Blair threatens Ed:

“If you had a strong political lead that was combining the politics of aspiration with the politics of compassion, I still think that’s where you could get a substantial majority…  If I ever do an interview on [the state of the Labour Party], it will have to be at length…”



Left on Left says:

The lefties are attacking because the panellist is a millionaire and lives in a London home worth upwards of two million. Someone had best tell them he’s called Ed Miliband.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,617 other followers