January 8th, 2014

SKETCH: ‘Ello, ‘Ello PAC

Something a bit fishy about the Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe. It’s only a hunch based on years of snap and unsubstantiated judgements but I’d arrest him.

It wasn’t just the bitey exchanges with the MPs on the Public Administration Committee. Truth to tell, the committee didn’t distinguish itself and it would be easy to get impatient with them.

No, the man talks too much, and too often to conceal rather than reveal.

During a previous committee appearance he had quoted a report which said the Met’s performance had been just fine. But in fact, the report had said Met performance gave “cause for concern”.

Hogan-Howe’s explanation ran for a full fifty feet of videotape but is summarised as – “I was quoting from the executive summary and the criticism was in the text of the report.”

The verbal slurry helped conceal the fact that the author of said report was Bernard Hogan-Howe himself. But then, why didn’t he remember what was in it?

He had forgotten that he’d written it.

He’d FORGOTTEN he’d – ?

Just turn off the tape and let me question him around the kidneys, Sarge.

On the matter of fiddled crime statistics, had Hogan-Howe spoken to whistleblower PC Patrick as he told the committee he would?

More low-value verbalising. No, he hadn’t specifically spoken to him as such, not personally. And why not? Apart from it being Christmas?

Actually, they had approached him after his whistleblowing appearance in order to “enquire about his welfare”.

That had been interpreted by the committee clerk as “trying to interfere with his evidence”. So, obviously, having said he wanted to talk to him he couldn’t talk directly to him in person, as such.

And then obviously Hogan-Howe couldn’t speak to him about fiddled crime statsistics because PC Patrick is up on charges of gross misconduct for publishing evidence about fiddled crime statistics.

The lesson from all this? “We need to learn what we can do to support whistleblowers.”

Support them, you see, not “enquire after their welfare”. And the welfare of their children. Lovely looking little ones.

Bernard Jenkin (whose hair is a crime category in itself) remarked that PC Patrick had been producing evidence of corrupt crime reporting for months and years and only after his committee appearance did Hogan-Howe take an interest in the matter.

More slurry.

Hogan-Howe is an odd one all right.

The committee didn’t nail him this time. But life is long, and time, no doubt, will tell.


  1. 1
    maurice saatchi says:

    i am boris johnson’s twin and I am rich.

    • 2
      But She Does Not Agree with the Jury says:
      • 6
        i seek religion says:

        i hide behind abbott.
        mission abort dear.

      • 11
        i don't n eed no doctor says:

        For once Abbott it would be sensible to keep your mouth shut.

        • 17
          Diane Abbott M.P. says:

          But, there’s a populist bandwagon to be ridden to get a few votes?

          • tracers are set. says:

            follow russell crowe in the quick and dirty.
            switch horses….then hop on Gene hackman..
            he will lead to Will Smith, who is will.i.am and does what he wants.

            he will lead to the firm of russell reynolds who in turn will deliver the dean of the harvard business school.

        • 27
          Grumpy Old Man says:

          If the woman had any sense she would enter a Trappist convent.

          • Ricki's Uncle Bob says:

            She has a problem with her legs as well as her mouth – her legs won’t let her walk past a hot pie shop and her mouth won’t talk past a shit bandwagon.

      • 16
        Susanne says:

        Very surprised that an MP could so actively be in contempt of Court.

        I doubt Diane will face prison though – think of the strain on the taxpayers catering budget at HMP if she did.

        Woman is humungous.

      • 20
        Whippersnapper2 says:

        You mean like Nigella got justice being put on trial for being a voluntary Crown witness by some moronic judge. That sort of justice you mean? The defence claims should never have been allowed after the first few words but our judges are pathetic. Lowest of low standards.

        • 133
          Jim says:

          The puzzle here is that the evidence was changed after the ex hubby sent his email. That takes a lot of Credibility away from everybody involved. I always thought that signed statements used to bring/defend a case had to be stood by
          or changed in the body of the Court with a proper explanation rather than – Cor that is a good story, We agreed with Him!
          Was it something to do with extra legal fees or the publishing Rights?
          So many unanswered questions in English Law today.

      • 28
        Just sayin' says:

        Mr Duggan was a father of five. That’s way too young to be a father imho.

      • 70
        Gary Bloke says:

        Precisely, it was a jury and not a judge or a civil servant. From the row they were making after the verdict, the Duggan family and hangers-on sound bad losers.

      • 135
        Anonymous says:
      • 144
        Cynic says:

        Yes…justified shooting of an armed drug dealing scumbag. Now will you come out say that and support the police?

    • 4
      Met Police FC says:

      We do what we want, we do what we waaaa-aanntttt,
      We’re the Met Police, we do what we want………

    • 5
      Comment Diane? says:
      • 12
        At least they didn't call them Gay says:
        • 21
          Susanne says:

          I sense that certain members of the community want an excuse for some new trainers and flatscreen TVs.


        • 58
          JH3094-0234-032 says:

          Strange, isn’t it.

          If a black man shoots a black man, they have little to say about it. They even lionise both parties. Respec’

          But if a white man shoots a black man, you get no end of fuss.

          Strange that.

    • 34
      A Nasty unpleasant people says:

      Blimey. Those Duggans are a violent lot.

    • 38
      Abbott wants Riots says:
    • 44
      Abbott is shit stirring says:
      • 51
        Bill Quango MP/5 says:

        Don’t even try and explain. She will never understand.

        • 103
          Whippersnapper2 says:

          Is that THE Diane the big fat overweight racist cow? I think we should be told.

        • 158
          FFS says:

          Let’s put it this way Fatbot. The jury. selected during commital proceedings where both sides were permitted to challenge the jurors to ensure they were fit to determine the outcome of the trial, that jury decided the killing was lawful. OK? Not for you, somebody not even at the trial, to question at all.

          So please FUCK OFF and SHUT UP before you cause any more problems,OK?

      • 53
        She's gone too far says:

        Is Abbott saying that the Jury is Corrupt?

        • 138
          Jim says:

          No, she is saying that the Verdict should have been restricted to only that part of the evidence. Whereas most normal people would want all the evidence included in the Verdict.

      • 62
        JH3094-0234-032 says:

        Diane, the vast vast VAST majority of shootings in this country are black men shooting other black men. Check out the London crime map if you don’t believe me. Our cities would be incredibly safe were it not for such enrichment.

        How come you only make a fuss when the shooter is white?

      • 64
        Blooming Godfrey says:

        I wonder if she’d rant on so much if Duggan had been white?

        • 69
          will says:

          hey you seen smith.
          i do what i want and you may have seen me in a western.
          or then maybe.

      • 110
        Tony B£air and the Renditioners says:

        Tough on drug dealers, tough on the causes of drug dealers.

        Have you forgotten already you fat fuckwit?

      • 146
        Cynic says:

        Dear Baffled, Yet again you equivocate. No wonder your community is so beset by crime. You should celebrate this verdict. Go on. Dare you to.

        • 160
          Reginald D Hunter says:

          That black bastard was letting down his brothers, and that fat black bit is supportin’ him.

          Shut the fuck up you fat ho.

      • 214
        Arsehole watch says:

        Her comment just shows you how thick and pig ignorant of the law Abbott is.

    • 197
      Anonymous says:

      twelve good men and true

  2. 3
    simple simon says:

    i am gooey bob and i use a bob or two to get the word out. i lack wood.

  3. 8
    i don't n eed no doctor says:

    Here we go, the media are talking up more riots.

  4. 9
    Whippersnapper2 says:

    He should have been arrested and tried already for the Mitchelgate cover up and police lies and lies and lies and more lies.

    • 29
      Anonymous says:

      Is there any danger of us having a report into Michelgate at some point ? the whole thing is an embarassment, which other country would still be fannying around if an elected MP had been set up by the Police ?

    • 157
      Psyche the Dog says:

      What’s that, Hoggie How could not remember what he had written, he evidently been interviewed by some young desperate copper wanting promotion, he would be banged to rights in no time.

  5. 10
    Brrrrrrap! says:

    Lock your doors, innit, blud?!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. 15
    i don't n eed no doctor says:

    Does anyone listen to Abbott News?

  7. 17
    the volunteer says:

    It is a true thing to say that there has been a dislocation between what is considered socially correct/ lawful ( see I separated those two because one is not the other) when the dislocation is evident within plod, has been recently demonstrated, then you can accurately state the fabric of society is falling apart.

    • 24
      the volunteer says:

      yes well ok I should probably say ” the law as written and the social law”

  8. 22
    Richard Smith says:

    If you want to see zero help or support for whistle blowers you should look at the information commissioners office. They are totally open with those complained about, fail to protect witnesses, and are generally a naïve pushover. They may as well not exist in their current form as they are only dealing with easy cases, the biggest abusers are pretty much immune from them.

    • 104
      They're all in it together says:

      Yep. Seen it myself.
      The senior civil servants statement to an investigator is deemed their personal info and asking for it is “flying in the face of the FOI Act.”
      Of course the judges are civil servants too…..

      • 200
        Mr Callaghan with the biggest weapon in the department says:

        In case it has escaped your notice, judges are appointed (mostly in secret) by other judges, all of whom come from the same ‘profession’. It is in all their interests to ensure that only the thickest amongst them ever get promoted to the Bench – which is why most courts are the province of the dimwads who really have no idea of what life is all about.

        Don’t want clever sods on the Benches undermining all the scams going on and fibs being told… This largely explains why we seem to be getting more and more perverse and totally unsuitable results and sentencing from them. Where is the present day Judge Jeffries? We need somebody to sort the current lot out pdq.

  9. 23
    Brrrrrrap! says:

    Mark Duggan’s aunt Carole Duggan says her nephew was “executed” and she will fight for justice

  10. 25
    Iain Duncan-Smith says:

    Universal Credit will be delivered on time and on budget.

  11. 30
    Ed the Eunuch says:

    If the police are not full of stupidity they are corrupt!

    • 41
      JohnM says:

      They are both!

    • 201
      Mr Callaghan with the biggest weapon in the department says:

      You ever heard of the Laughing Policeman??

      That used to be a joke 70 years ago, but these days it is these largely uneducated and out of control cvnts who are doing the laughing – at us. One of these days when the fat really does hit the fan, the police are going to have to decide just whose side they are on….

  12. 35
    i don't n eed no doctor says:

    Why did Mark Duggan have a gun in the first place?

    • 46
      nigels parachute in 2015 says:

      Because he does not appear to have been a law abiding citizen

      Whether that means he should have been shot though, is debatable

      • 83
        Londoner says:

        They have had the debate. The jury has decided.

        It was lawful to kill him.

        • 161
          FFS says:

          Exactly, the carefully chosen jury (where both sides get to cross examine the jurors), and who were at the trial and not merely reading tit-bits in the press, decided it was lawful to kill him.

          Why are we even discussing this? Unless you want to call into question the whole issue of jury trials?

      • 215
        World of Sport says:

        Law abiding citizens 1 Gun carrying scumbag 0 . Result !

  13. 36
    The Guardian says:

    Met police want water cannon ready to use in Britain by summer

    • 49
      The public says:

      I s it really going to be that hot?

      • 80
        Ban the Left says:

        The next spin is that burning buildings in London are a clear indication of global warming…

    • 202
      Mr Callaghan with the biggest weapon in the department says:

      Some dickhead in the local council will probably impose a hosepipe ban on them…

  14. 37
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    I think its pretty clear that duggon didn’t throw the gun over the fence

  15. 40
    Common sense says:

    The media really are trying their best to create something more out of this. They should wait to see the transcript to see why the jury concluded Duggan did not have the gun in his hand at the time of the shooting. The time line is so important. Specialised armed police follow and stop car containing extremely dangerous armed man. If he exited the car quickly and threw the gun, the police would only have seen an object thrown and would not be able to wait to confirm what was thrown. It would now be dependent on Duggans compliance to orders which would determine how the situation continued. If he did not comply and made to escape/raise his arms etc he is a legitamate target. As for Abbot she should know better.

    • 43
      Common sense says:

      As for that rabble who intimidated threatened that officer giving a statement. Shhot the effin lot

      • 65
        nigels parachute in 2015 says:

        But they were unarmed. Oh hang on, just remembered – it doesn’t matter if they are unarmed just as long as the officer who shoots them says he thinks they were armed

        • 74
          Blooming Godfrey says:


        • 75
          Ban the Left says:

          Dave should go and hug them to make everything better, and perhaps enoble the parents.

        • 162
          FFS says:

          Um, no, because they knew (correctly) that Duggan had purchased a firearm and had it with him.

          Regardless of what he might have thrown anywhere in the dark, they had reason to believe he posed a real danger both to the police and others.

        • 217
          Who gives says:

          Nigel its academic now your poster boy gangster is pan bread. Fuck him.

    • 47
      Tottenham Hotspot says:

      No! It was a murder innit! Coz ‘e was black!
      Burn everyfink! ‘Cept for Game coz we gonna get some PS4s innit!

    • 52
      i don't n eed no doctor says:

      Trouble is Abbott doesn’t know any better, she is racist and bigoted.

      • 203
        Mr Callaghan with the biggest weapon in the department says:

        …and exceptionally blinkered and THICK.

        HTF was she ever nominated to be an MP? The dregs of Acne?

    • 96
      Roma of the dump says:

      Of course the media want a riot, they make excellent Television.

  16. 47

    One would not regard Hogan-Howe as being from anywhere right of centre in his approach despite being billed as such.

    In fact, one would not regard David Cameron as such either.

    • 61
      Casual Observer 5 says:

      With this guy, the correct vernacular is:

      He is a bit more crooked than straight.

      His political orientation is Common Purpose.

    • 66
      Pick litter for bennies says:

      Who will be the first politician to meet the Duggans?.Evens Vaz and Abbott,2-1 Dave and Mili,1000-1 Griffin.

  17. 50
    Abbott's Friends says:
  18. 58
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    Christ, if no one is gonna be accountable for shooting a guy on a tubetrain who never had a gun- what were they expecting

  19. 63
    London, 2014 says:

  20. 68
    London Riots Part II: The Sequel says:

    Angry scenes outside Royal Courts of Justice as police give statement after Mark Duggan’s inquest

  21. 71
    Another violent leftie says:
    • 82
      Twitter Twats out in force says:

      As usual there is not a shortage of idiots tweeting on the subject and making comments which are at the least very questionable and risk possible arrest/ prosecution for incitement.

      People obviously have very short memories or don’t read the newspapers

    • 86
      BHH says:

      We know where they live

    • 152
      David Cameron Is A Cunt says:

      Well seeing as how you are clearly a Hunt right now then being a Hero would be an improvement. But if you actually want to be one then it’s not IDS who needs shooting in the throat, not in a world that contains Cameron, Clegg, Cable, Millipede, Balls, Obama etc etc.

  22. 73
    The LOLs continue says:
  23. 78
    The LOLs continue says:
  24. 79
    A media student who ISN'T a leftie!!!! says:
  25. 81
    The LOLs continue says:
  26. 84
    Mornington Crescent says:

    To those of you who may have the misfortune to live in London, can I suggest you go to bed tonight with a pair of asbestos underpants and a fire extinguisher…?

    • 88
      Brrrrrrap! says:

      You forget that the riots started in London and then spread across the country.

      • 95
        Casual Observer 5 says:

        How would disturbances in Manchester affect UKIP’s share of the vote in the upcoming by-election ?

      • 97
        Pick litter for bennies says:

        Weather Centre warning//heavy rain forecast in London,please avoid all unnecessary rioting.

        • 105
          Joined Up Thinking says:

          They are probably smart enough to realize that for a decent riot with lots of flames and safe looting you need a dry night.

          New Telly’s don’t like getting damp, and water damaged stolen goods sell for less than near perfect stolen goods.

      • 101
        History Boy says:

        It was looting, not riots. I doubt if many of the participants outside of Tottenham had ever heard of Duggan.

      • 125
        Robbie Peel says:

        If plod had shot the first looter in the 5 minutes, there would have been no riots in London or anywhere else.

        First rule of looting, shoot the fuckers, and keep shooting until they stop.

  27. 87
    Brrrrrrap! says:

    I hope the jury get police protection. From the sounds of it, the Duggan family and their supporters behaved in a threatening manner after the verdict was returned.

  28. 89
    M102 says:

    Lee Grasper getting his @rse handed to him on a plate on Sky News.

    • 99
      Warren Peace says:

      With all the cash Grasper has stolen off the taxpayer, you would think he’d get his effing teeth fixed.

  29. 91
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    The officer who shot him obviously needs moving back on to the beat

    Is there a limit on the number of people you can shoot because you honestly think they are holding a gun – when they aren’t?

    • 164
      FFS says:

      hopefully not….

    • 208
      Optician says:

      He should have gone to Specsavers.

    • 218
      To be read in a voice dripping in sarcasm says:

      Your right Nigel, the fact that he was a convicted drug dealer with a record of violence and known to carry guns was just coincidental to him being shot. It could have been anyone. If it hadnt been him it would have been the little old lady round the corner.

  30. 92
    Anonymous says:

    Lammy smears the jury. Wants more money spent.

    “There are aspects of this verdict that are somewhat perplexing and seemingly contradictory to those of who us who have carefully followed the proceedings over the last few months. A number of serious questions remain unanswered”.

    • 102
      Sunderland is a Labour ghetto thats why its shyte says:

      Lammy wouldnt dare say anything else,he knows what side his bread is buttered,as for Abbot I bet she is glad she had enough finances to send her son to a private school where he wouldnt have to mix with what Chukka would call chavs.

    • 150
      Cynic says:

      “My thoughts are with the family of Mark Duggan this evening.”

      ………..Not with the poor police officers threatened by him nor the children he and his friends sold drugs to

      “ the family will tonight feel that they are no closer to achieving justice for Mark”

      ……because the jury decided that he was an immediate threat to the lives of police officers and had to be shot.

      “the jury’s findings should be respected”

      …. Whoops…..As I am now trying to face two ways at the same time I almost fell over there

      “ The jury found that a number of key errors were made by Operation Trident and SOCA officers in the hours leading up to the shooting.”

      …and I will continue to grasp at these straws as a few may have votes attached to them

      “These questions must be answered not just for the sake of the Duggan family but to diffuse the confusion, conjecture and suspicion that continue to surround the events of that August evening. “

      ….ie buy off extremists and organised criminals using race as a cover for their criminality

      “The Duggan family’s sorrow and anger was palpable in court this afternoon “

      …….. as they must now answer their own questions about their role in bringing Mark up ino the criminal he became

      “ A number of serious questions remain unanswered.”

      Yada yada yada …. They jury heard the evidence but iu don’t want to admit the police were right to shoot him

      “It remains to be seen whether the IPCC will be well-placed to answer these questions.”

      …I am keeping my options open until I see how this plays ………

      • 165
        FFS says:

        Given that the jungle bunnies keep banging on about how persecuted they are…. we might as well persecute them, right?

    • 219
      To be read in a voice dripping in sarcasm says:

      Hardly surprising that Lammie finds aspects of this case surprising since he was clearly perplexed on celebrity mastermind.

  31. 99
    Ah! Monika says:

    Romanian migrant treated to Costa Coffee by Keith Vaz is accused of being a drug user who beat up his girlfriend and threatened to drown her

    • 106
      Not Blowing Whistles says:

      Not accused. There is a criminal record back in R’omania with his name and those charges on it, with other words like: Convicted.

    • 106
      Romanian accordion player on London Underground says:

      Thank you please.

  32. 109
    Guido Fawkes says:

    How can you not be armed and be lawfully killed? ! Defies belief.

    • 116
      Dr David K E L L Y says:

      Suicide ?

    • 126
      Tony B£air says:

      you never heard of Iraq, boy?

    • 143
      Jim says:

      Just ignore the evidence and make up your own story.

    • 151
      Cynic says:

      …you get shot by the met

    • 166
      FFS says:

      By buying a firearm and carrying it with you, so that people might reasonably expect that you intend to use it at some point?

    • 180
      Jack Ketch says:

      This is common law and exists throughout the English speaking world. One may use all reasonable force to defend oneself. If one believes that one is in imminent danger of a lethal attack (i.e. your life is in danger), one may use all force necessary, including lethal force to prevent that assault.
      In Britain this sensible common law right has been chipped away by the courts and many an honest burgher has been prosecuted for whacking a burglar over the head with a golfclub, but in clear-cut cases common law has been upheld.
      The officer had confirmed information that Duggan was carrying a weapon and had carried weapons in the past. The officer challenged Duggan and believed that Duggan had pointed a weapon at him (the mobile phone). It is this belief that the court recognised that the officer was acting reasonably even if he was mistaken.
      One may remember those stupid Indians who tried to hold up an embassy in London with replica handguns, they were quite surprised when armed officers shot them down like dogs–or more accurately, stupid Indians pointing what looked like firearms.
      The killers of Lee Rigby were lucky that women armed officers confronted them–I would have emptied the whole magazine into their skulls, like those nice SAS men did to the Irish in Gib–remember those chaps BELIEVED that the Irish terrorists had a remote bomb switch with them–it’s all about honest belief.

  33. 111
    Sunderland is a Labour ghetto thats why its shyte says:

    Duggan who was only 29 was the father of six to 3 different women no doubt the taxpayer will be busy in Tottenham over the next few years.

    • 141
      Elsie Hargreaves 5 Railway Terrace Dewsbury says:

      That is disgusting.

      The morals of a tom cat.

      If he had behaved like that in China I dread to think what would have become of him.

      There is no Legal aid in China.

      I feel so sorry for those poor children tonight.

      • 167
        FFS says:

        I’m not. At least their violent and criminal father won’t be having any further influence over their lives.


  34. 112
    Anonymous says:
  35. 113
    Sunderland is a Labour ghetto thats why its shyte says:

    Ed Milliband will be on shortly demanding a judge led inquiry and Vaz will nod oubt be down in Tottenham this evening for a foto op.

  36. 115
    Point of Information says:

    Duggan who was only 29 when he was shot dead by police, had lived his entire adult life under a Labour government.

  37. 117
    The Union Jack says:

    Say black in me! Good evening.

  38. 118
    A Tottenham villain says:

    Can I have my sock back?

  39. 119
    Sunderland is a Labour ghetto thats why its shyte says:

    Balkan Udate…The twelve or so romanians Big Issue sellers and accordian players have now returned to their pitches in Tyneside and Wearside after a 10 day break,up the workers.

  40. 121
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    I think he must have thrown the gun after he was dead if the police are to be believed, and who wouldn’t believe the police after plebgate?

    There is no way the police would close ranks to protect obe of their own if duggan had been unlawfully killed

    • 139
      Nigel's arsehole says:

      Yawn. No one cares. He was a scumbag and got what he deserved. Get over it

      • 142
        nigels parachute in 2015 says:

        I care. I don’t want to live in a society where the police have a free pass to shoot who ever they want by just claiming they thought that someone was holding a gun

        Surely the police need better training in identifying the difference between someone holding a gun and someone not holding a gun

        • 163
          Anonymous says:

          What a tit.

        • 168
          FFS says:

          They don’t. Duggan bought a gun and had it with him. How the hell were the police supposed to have known he threw it away in the dark?


          • nigels parachute in 2015 says:

            It wasnt dark it was broad daylight

          • A normal white guy says:

            I don’t won’t to live in a society where a career crim drug dealer thinks he can carry a gun across London in order to shoot another drug dealer.

            Now f u c k. of and go and play with the traffic you lefty r e t ard

          • nigels parachute in 2015 says:

            F u c k off

            You are probably like the rest of these right wing nutcases who thinks it was dark at 1815 in the middle of summer

        • 181
          Jack Ketch says:

          Have you ever used a firearm? Have you ever been combat pistol trained? Have you ever had to face the problem of shooting before you are shot?
          When in a life threatening situation one has two-tenths of a second to make a decision and the lawyers have the rest of your life to hang you out to dry.
          The known gun-carrying drug dealer, Duggan acted in a manner giving the officer sufficient cause–maybe you would have preferred a dead plod?

          • nigels parachute in 2015 says:

            No but if I had been trained but could still not tell the difference between someone holding a gun and someone not holding a gun – then I might start to think I was in the wrong profession or that I should have gone to spec savers

            If the situation requires that the police in such situations avoid ever putting themselves in even the slightest danger – then duggan was as good as dead when he got in the taxi and was indeed executed

            If police policy in such circumstances is always to kill people like duggan rather than attempt to arrest them – then this policy should be made clear

            If you dont want to face the dangers associated with arresting people with illegal firearms then don’t join the police force

          • Rightwinggit says:

            NP, you should have stopped at the word “no”

            I have been trained, and you haven’t got time to fill out a risk assessment form and take pictures, when the target presents itself, you fire.

            Better to be tried by twelve than carried by six.

  41. 122
    EU Watch says:

    EU migrants abusing benefits system is not a problem confined to UK, just largely ignored by the UK:

  42. 124
    Sunderland is a Labour ghetto thats why its shyte says:

    Let us not forget PC Blakelock hacked down and murdered by decapitation on Broadwater Farm RIP

  43. 127
    EU Watch says:

    2000 police were deployed in Athens to enforce the protest ban imposed for the inauguration of Greece to take over the EU presidency.

    Far left party leader was attacked by the riot police:

    So, who exactly is the democratic authority in G’reece, or do they really not have one at present ? (Rhetorical question)

  44. 129
    NSA says:

    Remember the bad old days before Twitter when the brain’s prefrontal cortex used to get in the way of self-expression.

  45. 130
    Anonymous says:

    Or Lee Rigby

    run down then hacked to death by Afro moz with meat cleavers.

  46. 131
    EU Watch says:

    Looks like Cameron is winning friends in Poland, not:

    • 137
      Boycott away says:

      Perhaps they could boycott coming here in the first place. That’ll learn us!

  47. 134
    EU Watch says:

    Surprised the UK left isn’t raising the profile of this, admittedly just a little outside the EU:

    Protest has been going on for a few hours now outside the K’nesset.

  48. 148
    i don't n eed no doctor says:

    C4 News broadcasting live from Tottenham. That’s right C4 stir it up, lefts have some looting.

    • 170
      FFS says:

      If the jungle bunnies start behaving like jungle bunnies then we will probably be forced to come to the conclusion they really are just jungle bunnies.

      Let them get on with it.

  49. 149
    ian says:

    the firearms officers said in evidence the only thing he was focusing on was the gun

    why was he focussing on somthing 20 feet away from where duggan was standing ?

    • 171
      FFS says:

      Cos it was dark and he thought Duggan had a gun in his hand, which was reasonable since Duggan did have something in his hand and he had bought a gun and taken it with him in the taxi.

      Presumably Duggan threw the gun away to hide it from the police so he couldn’t be charged with a firearms offence. In that case we can assume he didn’t shout “cooeee rozzers, here’s my gun I’m throwing it away over there so you won’t be able to find it and charge me with firearms offences”. I presume he did it surreptitiously so the police had no idea he didn’t have it in his hand at the time they decided it was safest to shoot him.

      I would have done exactly the same in the police officers shoes. Nobody would have thanked me if Duggan had decided to keep hold of that gun and use it.

  50. 153
    ian says:

    and why did the police originally claim that duggan had fired first?

    something doesnt feel right about much of what those officers have claimed

    • 172
      FFS says:

      I don’t remember the police ever saying that, even when the events took place.

      But there you are, you have to rely on the jury hearing the whole story in great detail and not just what the papers say to make it all sound a lot more contraversial.

      Remember that Tony Martin that shot that lad in the back when he was running away from him? The papers tried to make that look much more a close thing than it was. Tony Martin was as guilt as sin. Putting a copper in the dock for making a 50/50 decision would be quite wrong.

  51. 174
  52. 175
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    The officer who shot him said he was holding a gun in a sock

    What happened to the sock?

    And if you were a firearms officer who unlawfully shot an unarmed man – wouldnt it always be a good idea to say that you believed he had a gun pointed at you?

    If these officers were watching his movements when he got out the taxi how come no one saw him throw the gun?

    Something doesnt quite stack up for me

    • 184
      An Actuary says:

      They shot the bloke, as planned. Then found the gun was in a sock inside the car. ‘What the fuck do we do now?’ Chuck it and pretend he threw it. Why not just stick it in his hand? Come off it, who would believe that?

    • 220
      Johnny says says:

      I think the one that shot Duggan said he thought he saw a gun. It was another policeman that said the gun was in a sock.

  53. 178
    nigels parachute in 2015 says:

    18.15 on the 4th of august would not have been dark

  54. 186
    Cato Street Conspirator says:

    I think it is generally understood that the filth lie their heads off, even when it isn’t necessary. It is the nature of people who go in for the job.

  55. 189
    JH3094-0234-032 says:

    Does it occur to anyone that were it not for black-on-black gun crime, we practically would not need armed police in the first place?


    Filter to gun murders and observe the demographic involved. Who gets to riot about this again?

  56. 192
    Displaced Brummie says:

    Hogan? How! Looks like a wrong ‘un.

  57. 207
    EyeSee says:

    The Duggan shooting comments and verdict are more to worry about. Once again armed police officers, unable to substantiate why they ‘had’ to open fire are exonerated. But our military, in a completely different scenario and actually under fire, in combat are relentlessly pursued and inappropriately imprisoned. What is going on? The police are clearly seen as a more direct tool of government and the need is to keep them on side. The army can go hang. I have looked at several IPCC reports of shootings and two things become clear. 1) the training and particularly the leadership of the armed police is inappropriate to the situations they are deployed to and of low quality and 2) the IPCC are there entirely and only to support the political view and certainly not to seek ways to improve standards.

  58. 213
    big D says:

    Will the cops and Cameroon stop pandering to ” the community ” ie a few of the black residents of Tottenham and beyond please .
    Most people black and white must be heartily glad to see one member less of a notorious and vile gang.
    Its time to now round up the rest and put them out of harms way for a very long time for the safety of all inc the police.
    A job needed and required was done , end of story move on .
    The aunt and the rest of the baying mob inside and outside the court hurling abuse and threats at the jury as well as it seems destroying court property should have all been arrested and in front of the beak themselves this morning .
    Complete morons no doubt angry that they will now not be entiteled to com pen sation

  59. 221
    pc bollocks says:

    got what he deserved, fuck him abbott and chuka spear

Seen Elsewhere

Corrupt, Incompetent UN Has No Right to Lecture Us | Dan Hannan
Mirror’s Lazy Lie | Guardian
Hungary’s Heir to Thatcher | Conservative Woman
Farage and Salmond Both Want Outopia | David Aaronovitch
More Missing UKIP Money | Times
Church Should Fight Evil of Welfare Dependency | Stephen Glover
1 in 16 Pick Up Infections in Filthy NHS Hospitals | Mail
Let’s Get Evangelical | David Cameron
From the IRA to Windsor Castle | WSJ
Coulson: Everything You Need to Know in 6 Seconds | MediaGuido
Mo Ansar’s Silence | Adrian Hilton

Guido-hot-button (1) Guido-hot-button (1)

Cathy Jamieson MP, Labour’s Shadow Treasury minister, commenting on Treasury analysis of the economic impact of tax changes…

“If the Treasury is looking at the economic impact of tax changes, then surely it should examine the impact of the rise in VAT and cuts to tax credits? George Osborne’s £12 billion VAT rise knocked confidence, helped to choke off the recovery and has cost families £1,350 over the last three years.”

orkneylad says:

What’s he been doing FFS, mining bitcoins?

Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:


AddThis Feed Button

Guido Reads