September 13th, 2013

Taxpayer Pays MPs’ Relatives £4 Million-a-Year

snouts-frontpagesFollowing on from Guido yesterday, this morning the Mail and the Mirror go after the MPs who top up their household income by employing their wives and daughters, creaming off the taxpayer. A quarter of MPs give a job to their family, the taxpayer forks out £4 million-a-year to pay the wages of family members. The problem is not so much that relatives of MPs have these jobs, rather the often non-existent selection process. How did they get the job? What was the selection process? How can they ever be sacked?

One of the most common complaints Guido receives from parliamentary researchers is that in some cases family employees simply don’t do any work for their money. They often aren’t even aware the wife is employed at all…

pig-in-shit

Back in 2009 after the expenses scandal Sir Christopher Kelly’s Committee on Standards in Public Life report into MPs’ Expenses and Allowances looked into this in detail. They found that MPs paid family members on average nearly £2,000 more than non-family members.

The Committee determined

  • Such arrangements are at odds with good employment practice in the private and public sector.
  • There would be line-management issues between two people who had a personal relationship and “it is difficult to see how such an approach could ever operate satisfactorily in practice, given the personal relationships involved.”
  • „„Employing family members is fundamentally unmeritocratic, restricting access for others to political experience and jobs.
  • The employment of family members has been banned in a number of other legislatures.
  • MPs’ offices are not small family businesses. They are supported by public funds.

For those reasons the Committee on Standards in Public Life recommended that

pig-in-shitMPs should no longer be able to appoint members of their own families to their staff and pay them with public funds. Those currently employing family members should be able to continue to do so for the life of one further Parliament or five years, whichever is the longer.

MPs quietly scuppered the family gravy train being derailed…


150 Comments

  1. 1
    The British Public says:

    Good work Guido.

    Like

    • 4
      tommo says:

      Yes!

      Like

    • 15
      Ron Barras says:

      The scummers are at it again.

      This is cronyism and nepotism run wild with our money. If these MPs can’t spot it, they’re not fit to pass legislation.

      Like

      • 21
        Londoner says:

        If.

        You have answered your own question. Any MP employing a relative should be banned from public office.

        Like

        • 111
          Peter Expat says:

          Rubbish ! Guido is going down the road of the worst red tops. The article is an insult to the many hard working relatives who work for MPs. Just because some abuse it does not give carte blanche for tarring them all with the same brush.
          Why should an MP have to sack someone who knows them well, enough to function well as a good PR/secretary and who is willing to work all sorts of unsocial hours just because they happen to be related? Some of them had the same job before they married the MP.
          It looks like any MP wanting to marry his secretary is now being encouraged to live in sin, since marrying would disadvantage them.

          I’d be more worried about all the queers.

          The bugger currently in the news was elected as a senior conservative party official previously. Has the party no judgment at all these days ?

          When will the UK get back to normal, when it had the mentality to rule the world, instead of worrying about useless things while the country sinks into bankruptcy? There is sod all left to flog off now.

          Like

          • Stating the Obvious says:

            Perhaps we object because it would take the sort of probability displayed in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead to produce a position where coincidentally this many relatives just happen to be the ideal person for the job. It stinks and the PAC would rightly have a field day if any Govt Department did it.

            Like

        • 123
          Anonymous says:

          Im obviously wrong, but i thought employing Relatives was banned when we had the expenses scandal a few years ago ? it seems to have got worse looking at the lists !

          Like

          • Which Trough do you Require says:

            It was put out that they would be banned, but then the proposed ban was quietly lifted a few months later

            Like

          • Anonymous says:

            Who sets the salaries? Why do some secretaries get around £50k. Something really stinks here. Come on Guido,get to the bottom of it.

            Like

    • 20
    • 30
      Fishy says:

      I don’t agree.

      On this occasion the Committee have got this wrong. These unlike public appointments – like the one the hopeless Jaqui Smith was placed into yesterday – are not like other jobs. The normal ‘fair and open rules should not apply.

      As I posted yesterday, imagine for example if an MP advertised the position on a fair and open basis and they had to consider all and sundry, irrespective of political beliefs. Think about the Labour sockpuppets that would use their entryist techniques to worm their way into an MPs office, confidential papers etc. They would cause havoc and embarrassment at every opportunity.

      And what about the apparently good employee that turns out to be a lazy fucker…sick all the time (and I’ve met plenty of them). When the MP had to sack them can you imagine what would happen. Polly, Owen, the BBC and it’s Guardian subsidiary would have a field day.

      If an MP believes their his partner has the skills to run their office, they have their trust, and they are paid the market rate, that’s more than ok by me.

      BUT it has to be a real job….they’ve got to work for their money…and they should be paid no more than the market rate, something that the Commons authorities could dictate by using Civil Service pay scales

      Like

      • 51
        Ma­qb­oul says:

        And if the wife is a lazy fucker, she wouldn’t be sacked and we’d still be footing the bill for her.

        All the pitfalls you’ve mentioned are the same for every business and public department and yet they manage perfectly well.

        Like

      • 56
        Married man with children who feels unrepresented in Parliament says:

        Good post. Allowing MPs to employ their wives and children also ensure that at least some are heterosexuals with a family life. It also allows constituencies to try to select a husband and wife team, as opposed to the junior metrosexual apparatchik that their party central office or it trades union bosses wish to foist on them.

        Like

        • 140
          Anonymous says:

          Talking about employing children,i see Euan Blair is getting married on saturday, the Bride is the stepdaughter of Sian Lloyd.In the DM Sian says she hasnt been invited, which sounds very small minded.The Brides parents divorced 13 years ago and Sian only arrived on the scene 6 years ago ! Mum in Law from Hell alert !!

          Like

      • 64
        Torch and Pitchforks 'R' Us says:

        Yada, yada…

        All pitchforks are available in ‘oldskool’ 2 prong or the more deadly looking 5 pronged version.

        Free torches with every purchase.

        Like

      • 119
        Anonymous says:

        SITUATION VACANT: Pest control officer/Crime prevention operative.
        (Would suit recently retired/sacked Military personnel)

        DUTIES: to include extermination of all Parliamentary parasites.

        RATES OF PAY: 25% of all TAX PAYER funds saved. Pro rata £1 000 000 + MANY MANY MORE £MILLIONS

        BONUS SCHEME: BBC TROUGHERS, PAEDOS, NON ENTITIES (Owen Jones, Chris Hunne, Stephanie Flanders, ETC ETC ETC)

        PERIOD OF CONTRACT: LIFETIME!

        APPLICATIONS TO UK PLC.

        Like

      • 124
        FFS says:

        Jesus, my wife is the last person I’d trust. She’d be leaking stories to the press every five minutes for her own amusement. And she has some very strange political opinions too.

        Like

    • 72
      Wonga says:

      I’d like the public to pay my wife to stay at home and do my paperwork for me in my public service role. But I’d rightly be laughed out of my bosses office if I asked.

      Like

    • 113
      EqualityLawsApply says:

      Guido should now check whether any of those MPs who employ family members also employ, or advertise for, non-paid or barely-paid interns.

      When approaching the MPs with such queries, they should be warned their responses can be double-checked via FOI requests.

      Like

  2. 2
    Prince Kropotkin says:

    Nepotism is theft from the taxpayer

    Like

  3. 3
    Nothing Better To Do says:

    Politics is the art of theft. No surprise that political professionals are good at fiddling their expenses.

    Like

    • 112
      Problem Solved says:

      Restrict family help to an MP’s spouse or Civil Partner.
      Pay and job description should be standard and published.

      Like

  4. 5
    Go now Ed while there is still time for a new 2015 leader. Diane Abbott says:

    In a thinly veiled article for her Jamaican Newspaper column. British MP Diane Abbott calls for Edward Mliband to stand down as Labour leader.

    http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/columns/The-challenge-presented-by-political-leadership-contests_15008696

    Like

    • 53
      Dr Strangelove says:

      Ghost written ?

      Like

      • 83
        Jamaica Observer says:

        She writes it herself (I think) A regular Sunday column. Can’t see any earnings declared in her “Members’ financial interests” returns though

        http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/130827/abbott_diane.htm

        Like

        • 110
          Dr Strangelove says:

          you don’t think that one reads like it was written by somebody else ?

          Like

          • Horses for courses says:

            I don’t think so. All her Sunday musings in the Jamaica Observer sound different to the Abbott we hear over here, I reckon she is fine tuning her words for the different audiences.

            Oddly she comes across more rational and intelligent for her readers in Jamaica than she does for her constituents in Hackney. Which makes me wonder if she is putting on an act in Britain by sounding the radical anti white, black woman. Listen to her TV stuff 20 years ago and she has a posh middle class accent presenting coherent arguments unlike her cultivated rasta Image today.

            Like

        • 114
          What a plonker. says:

          She certainly did not write it herself, she is as thick as two short planks.

          Like

    • 78
      Ma­qb­oul says:

      There’s only one person more unsuitable for leader of the Labour Party than Milliband…

      Like

  5. 6
    Time 2 CTRL, ALT & DEL says:

    Has it ever occurred to anybody that if they didn’t employ their wives/ partners they would a) have to employ somebody else and b) end up in bed with somebody else.
    I don’t see what the fuss is about.

    Like

    • 8
      Monganony says:

      You didn’t read Guido’s post. Some spouses/relatives are not even aware that they are employed.

      Like

      • 31
        Time 2 CTRL, ALT & DEL says:

        Then in his attack he should identify those rather than throw this blanket over all.
        It is not GFs usual style – maybe the intern was at the office first this morning.

        Like

        • 52
          Torch and Pitchforks 'R' Us says:

          People like you really give me the hump.

          Like

          • Married man with children who feels unrepresented in Parliament says:

            Unthinking camels with humps are rather like the Salafists who put the hate into the Caliphate.

            Like

        • 57
          Ma­qb­oul says:

          It should be over all so that we can see the magnitude of this taxpayer funded problem of nepotism.

          Like

        • 68
          Casual Observer says:

          A number were directly identified in articles yesterday.

          Including again in this post would distract from subject that MSM have now picked up and what the Committee on Standards in Public Life set down as guidance / rules.

          At best it is clear that many MPs have not followed the spirit of the rules and have apparently denied equal opportunity for employment for publicly funded positions.

          Like

      • 115
        Peter Expat says:

        OK. Name them. There are probably very few. Chucking out glib headlines solves nothing. It isn’t news if the vast majority work hard and do a good job.

        Like

    • 27
      Gideon says:

      Probably it would be less expensive. That last point, they do that anyway don’t they

      Like

  6. 7
    Y says:

    here’s another good one c/o the fascist dwp:

    http://www.pontefractandcastlefordexpress.co.uk/news/local-news/benefit-cut-in-job-hunt-row-1-6038130

    tory scum stop at nothing to hit the poor/ disabled/ unemployed

    THE BANKERS CAUSED THE ECONOMIC CRISIS BUT IDEOLOGY (NAZI) RULES THE TORY SCUMBAGS

    Like

    • 22
      Lord Rennard says:

      Why don’t poor, disabled and unrmployed people get a job then, like the rest of us or is it their hoooman rites?

      Like

    • 24
      Casual Observer says:

      The ideology which rules is communitarianism, not national socialism.

      This was introduced by Blair (third way) and imported from Europe.

      LibLabCon is a continuation of this: Cameron is not a Conservative just an EU puppet.

      Like

    • 28
      Who cares anymore, it's Syria people care about not people of this country says:

      Brown created the economic crisis in Britain, by taxing everything in sight to pay for votes, by the way the Nazis were socialists, go and get on your bike and compete with all the immigrants that Liebour’s open door policy has let in, you can’t have it both ways, someone has to pay ,it’s your turn, get over it.

      Like

    • 129
      FFS says:

      Has it occured to you that National Insurance was invented by the Labour Party but the money simply goes to the treasury where it is spent there and then. It is not an insurance scheme at all. It is a fraud and always has been.

      If it was an insurance scheme then employees would pay in during the good times and there would be money to give out when there was a downturn. But since the Labour government had spent all the money and a lot more besides during the good times, there is nothing left to pay out now we are in the shit.

      Putting it simply, Labour are taking us as fools, have a long history of taking us as fools and are screwing us all. I’ve got no time for them or their lickspittle activists like you.

      Like

  7. 9
    DeanoX says:

    I praise the MPs clear +ve stance on encouraging the transferable tax allowance to maximise net income for married couples that this approach shows…I just wish they’d let the rest of us do the same. Guido you really should ensure you allow for Tax implications when you create the headline numbers. E.g. The Dorries are making fine use of 3 personal allowances whilst if just one of them was “earning” the headline total they would have already lost that single personal allowance.

    Like

  8. 11
    Mehdi Hasan says:

    Don’t let this Friday 13th be unlucky for you. Get up, put some lipstick on, wear your highest heels, and slap Friday 13 in the face.

    Like

  9. 12
    Carina says:

    Vote Huhne get twice for the Pryce.

    Like

  10. 13
    Popeye says:

    I can see nothing wrong with this set up, with the proviso they are actually working and not simply on the pay roll. Presumably someone would have to do the work and who more trustworthy than a relative (with the exception of a Milliband).
    If this is not the case, then it is an open and shut case of fraud and should be treated as such.

    Like

    • 18
      Londoner says:

      Then you are an apologist for corruption. This is public money.

      Jobs should be advertised and there should be a fair selection process.

      Like

    • 19
      Fiddle says:

      So. Any employee who has staff can insist on said staff being relatives?

      Naïve one, can’t you see that letting MPs employ their nearest and dearest out of the public purse is open to corruption on so many fronts?

      MPs are not exactly above fiddling their books are they?

      Like

    • 32
      Ron Barras says:

      Sorry, this is public money. It’s my money. And I want it spent with proper safeguards.

      These scummers need to join the real world. With their subsidised canteens, lavish housing expenses and more they’re all on the take.

      Like

    • 37
      Fishy says:

      Agreed Popeye.

      Nothing wrong with this as long as it’s a proper job.

      Essentially an MPs office is a small operation. Many, many small firms employ relatives.

      Nothing wrong with this at all. I would be happy for the Commons to enforce specific rates pay for the job

      Like

      • 47
        The Committee says:

        •MPs’ offices are not small family businesses. They are supported by public funds.

        http://order-order.com/2013/09/13/taxpayer-pays-mps-relatives-4-million-a-year/

        Like

      • 54
        End Corruption says:

        Bollocks. An MP’s office is not a small family farm or newsagent.

        It is a public office, paid for by the public. Employees should be fairly selected. An MP may say he needs to be able to trust people. Every employer who has to recruit from the talent pool that is ‘the public’ has this issue – MPs will just have to learn how to manage people professionally.

        Like

      • 89
        bergen says:

        Wrong. Small firms can employ their relatives because it is their own money and they can spend it as they like. This is our money.

        I’ve no problem with a spouse having a small honorarium for telephone answering duties but, as others on this thread have pointed out, being an MP is not a small private family business.It is a public office.

        Like

        • 120
          Peter Expat says:

          Given MPs working day, it is also a 24/7 job for their secretaries. It isn’t 9-5. If you want to pay for double the staff on a two shift system with all staff,employed politically correctly, be willing to pay the price.
          The present system is going to be cheaper.
          Checking to see that all the currently employed relatives are genuine workers doing the job is not going to be too difficult and anyone failing the test could be charged with fraud. It isn’t brain surgery.
          Government by this sort of Goebbels stuff is not the way to go.

          Like

          • Confucius say says:

            Our MPs merely rubberstamp legislation made in the EU. This ‘long hours’ culture is a myth, they have loads of breaks every year & majority do f@ck all.

            Like

        • 134
          Village Idiot says:

          …..Employing family is very open to corruption and cover up,whereas a person who is not family could expose wrongdoing more easily!!!! As ever,unfair as it may be,employing your wife,spouse or any close relative looks wrong in government……

          Like

  11. 16
    Londoner says:

    That is the point. MPs should give someone else a chance at a job, if indeed there is a job. MPs are well paid enough not to need to fiddle like this.

    As for sleeping with an MP, I can think of few things worse

    Like

  12. 17
    Howzat1932 says:

    The biggest claimers are most probably the same grubby people who moan about the low basic wage .If its such a low rate and over worked existance why the race to get their wives and kids in the trough,I doubt very much if long serving Hon.membaers like Dennis Skinner will retire with less than a few millions in the bank and a pension we mere mortals can dream of.What he can honestly say he has acchieved other than the odd intervention at PMQS which is just to let us know where he stands shoulder to shoulder with Joseph Stalin .A plauge on all their houses.

    Like

    • 135
      FFS says:

      He doesn’t stand shoulder to shoulder with anyone. He just mouth the words he needs to to get himself noticed now and then so his supporters keep on voting for him. It’s all about keeping himself on the same gravy train. He doesn’t need to work too hard because the people that vote for him are mostly morons. He doesn’t give a flying f**k about anybody else. He has a vested interest in keeping his supporters in the gutter and yet somehow they never catch on that life never gets any better for them no matter how long Labour are in power.

      Time has shown that the more lefty they are, the more in it for themselves they become.

      Like

  13. 23
    John Tandy says:

    Yet another abuse of taxpayers money…..

    Like

  14. 26
    The British Public says:

    Where is my right of recall?

    (And I don’t mean a fake right to beg a committee of politicians to consider if one of their number has let the side down by being caught out).

    Like

  15. 29
    Dave says:

    I employ my wife to support the Syrian rebels on the taxpayer

    Like

  16. 34
    Sandra in Accounts says:

    Until we execute the top ten MP troughers publicly every year they will not stop thieving from us.

    Like

  17. 35
    M a f i a Boss says:

    I have always employed members of the family

    And they obey, unlike other wimmin and children

    Like

  18. 38
    Squire from the Shires says:

    I remember when the Member’s wife did all this work for free

    And when the Member represented Britain’s interests

    Like

    • 67
      Nostalgic says:

      You must be old. How is the free TV license going? Seen anything worth watching on the state broadcaster recently?

      Like

  19. 39

    This is fine theory but it only goes so far. Handycock has shown us that it is possible to incentivise a young woman by giving her a role in exchange for sex. No family is involved here. But it is still abuse of their ability to use taxpayers’ monies to prefer themselves in some way.

    Frankly this sort of thing has always gone on and, in all probability, always will. It is relatively small beer on the one hand but could be argued to loosen ethical standards on the other.

    I am far more concerned about the billions which are being spent needlessly employing non-job no-goods, overseas aid which gets misused and the EU contribution and which dwarf these poultry, if undesirable, sums.

    102953

    Like

  20. 41
    Richard Timney says:

    You’re out of touch Guido, don’t you realise we spouses have to pay for our own porn now!

    Like

  21. 46
    Mehdi Hasan says:

    All those stickers said “Vote for Owen Jones”, and we didn’t listen. <- boom-tish!!

    Like

  22. 49
    Grabbit & Scarper says:

    So, there we have it….

    The most sickening aspect is the moronic tossers that continue to vote these scum/thieves into a positions of trust and responsibility…

    British Parliment “all in it together”

    Like

    • 63
      Gideon says:

      It has now become party central offices who dictate who stands as a candidate, that applies to all parties, especially the parachuted articles that are nominated to stand in one party states constuencies

      Like

      • 145
        Calling for Bert says:

        Aye maybe so, but once safely ensconced some idiot voter in their constituency has to pop up and vote for the scumbag….otherwise they are fooked!

        Like

  23. 58
    A nincumpoop says:

    OMG, you people just don’t get it, do you.

    MPs have won a fair competition after selflessly put themselves forward as representatives of the people.

    We owe them all a great debt.

    How can you possibly think that they’re in any way self-serving? What a hopeless bunch you are.

    Like

    • 74
      Gideon says:

      You must be one of them then, admittedly there are a few who altruistic, but most cannot wait to jump into the trough, they would scratch each others eyes out to get into a nice safe, jobbies for life constituency eg when the number of constituencies was proposed to be reduced.

      Like

    • 81
      any old crap says:

      News to me they represent the people, they give the impression they represent monied interests and themselves also the party they are in, if you email an MP on anything you get back a load of crap which is the party take of what’s going on, opinions count even for MPs so hopeless we may be, we are still part of the public which is mighty peeved off with the way MPs serve the public, time to stop paying them and let them serve for the public good.

      Like

    • 93
      Casual Observer says:

      Does that analysis break down for the Labour selections who paid for their chance to stand in safe Labour seats ?

      And then there is Falkirk. (is report out yet ?)

      Like

    • 116
      Anonymous says:

      Liblabcons are enemies of the people and will be arrested and executed for treason after regime change.

      Like

  24. 59
    Making the point. says:

    This arrangement happens up and down the land. I have this arrangement for my small business and we both contribute. Why the feck if my wife has the required skills and experience am I ever going to employ anyone else? Please don’t throw that public money crap around if they can’t then nor could we

    Like

  25. 60
    Hoots! It's Clown says:

    The plumber came early around and gave my stink pipe a good rodding.

    Which was surprising, as I’d asked him to change a tap washer.

    Like

  26. 61
    Anne Sard says:

    Like

    • 71
      Ma­qb­oul says:

      And you can each live in each other’s second homes, share expense outgoings, and plot over soggy lasagne.

      Mind, the pair of you have to stare at each other’s face over breakfast.

      Like

  27. 69
    nellnewman says:

    Sllippery aren’t they, these MP’s?

    As soon as one troughing scheme is discovered and halted they’ve come up with another.

    Like

  28. 77
    RickyTshed says:

    Mp’s should be paid a salary with no expenses, they can then have as many of their family as staff as they damn well want.

    Like

    • 86
      A taxpaying member of the public says:

      As their employer I expect MPs to get best value for my money. They must advertise jobs and, fairly, select the best person for the post, not their shag du jour.

      Like

      • 107
        French MP says:

        Shag du jour? Very bad taste and inaccurate expression….

        Here, in fact, we make looove to all the sensual journalists who are presented to us to get juicy tips..They are called the “Flying Squadron” – which?for your historians, was created by Catherine de Medicis to distract and control the opposition…

        Our female assistants merely provide the “capotes anglaises”…

        Like

  29. 79
    Dr Strangelove says:

    Maj could create a new officer with the power of life and death to oversee these crooks and summarily deal with the guilty. I’m sure she would have the backing of the populace.

    Like

    • 137
      FFS says:

      Personally I’d like them all put in centre court at Wimbledon while the populace comes along and urinates on them. It could be shown on line TV.

      Like

  30. 80
    couldn't make it up says:

    ‘At odds with good practice in the public and private sectors’ like most jobs aren’t already sorted for family and friends.

    Like

  31. 87
    Taxpayer says:

    Wait until someone starts talking about the troughing at freeby Government Residences – fooking millions up the wall there

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/gallery/2010/may/18/coalition-government

    Like

  32. 91
    lescrompsblogg says:

    Got to keep this one going otherwise it’s #backunderthecarpet

    Like

  33. 96
    Yuri Nate says:

    I’ve been inundated with sellers all morning.

    Any more ?

    I just can’t hold the price much longer

    GOLD 1,309.70 -20.60 -1.55%

    Like

  34. 98
    If at first you don't suck seed says:

    Come on cat, random primes won’t do.

    These are not algorithms as promised

    103913 103919 103951 103963 103967 103969 103979 103981 103991 103993 103997 104003 104009 104021 104033

    Like

  35. 100
    Mick Smetaphor says:

    Can i just point out that a gravy train does not run on rails?

    It is a vessel for dispensing gravy and is generally hand operated. It sits on a table, acting as a small china reservoir for this particular type of sauce.

    Please can you stop mixing up these two types of train?

    @ohthisbloodypc

    Like

  36. 101
    Captain Sensible says:

    The real scandal is George Osborne’s hair.

    3.142

    Like

  37. 104
    LBB? says:

    MPs employing wives will be messy come divorce.
    Can a de-sacked wife claim unfair dismissal

    Like

    • 128
      Nogbad the Bad says:

      Good point. How many wives know where the skeletons are buried. Also if it wasn’t wives, would more Tracey Temples be employed instead and MP’s time wasted tupping them, at least if a wife is employed, the MP’s are not going to spend half the day bending them over the desk.

      Like

  38. 106
    If only the poor could fiddle the system like MPs says:

    Wanker Gove says its the fault of the poor that they use food banks.

    Like

  39. 141
    Jimmy says:

    I find myself in the disturbing position of agreeing with a Guido post. I must have missed something.

    Like

  40. 143

    BROKEN BRITISH POLITICS – WHO IS BACKING THE TORIES
    Labour were often referred to as the Looney Left,hinting at Communism by Tories.The Tory Party are referred to as the Nasty Party by us the General Public,why – because they have no consideration for anyone except their Money Making Cohorts.They are Thieving from the Public Purse to Line their own pockets.Their Lies & Deceit hold no bounds.They have Isolated the Working Class ,Finance runs this Country we are no more than an International Money Laundering outfit for the Benefit of the Corrupt Money Moguls that back Privatisation.Privatisation deprives the ‘working class’ of any revenue for social cohesion.They massage the Unemployment figures for their own benefit because high unemployment doesent look competent but suits their agenda of an easily sackable work force to give Private Companies cheap Labour.Who benenefits from NHS sell off.Andrew Lansley: Architect of the Health and Social Care bill – John Nash, the chairman of Care UK, gave £21,000 to fund Andrew Lansley’s personal office in November 2009.David Cameron: Nursing and care home tycoon Dolar Popat has given the Conservatives £209,000.Hedge fund boss John Nash is one of the major Conservative donors with close ties to the healthcare industry.He and wife Caroline gave £203,500 to the party over the past five years.The “hedgie” is also a founder of City firm Sovereign Capital, which runs a string of private healthcare firms. Fellow founder Ryan Robson is another major Tory donor who has given the party £252,429.45.His donations included £50,000 to be a member of the party’s.Leafers Group a secretive cash for access culb. Harriet Baldwin: Conservative MP for West Worcestershire. Former managing director of JP Morgan Asset Management. JP Morgan are major players in healthcare. Gregory Barker: MP for Bexhill and Battle. Henry Bellingham – Conservative MP for North-West Norfolk. Jake Berry: MP for Rossendale and Darwen.Graham Brady: MP for Altrincham and Sale.Simon Burns: Chelmsford MP. Nick de Bois: MP for Enfield North.. Andrew Bridgen: MP for North West Leicestershire.Steve Brine – Mp for Winchester.Damian Collins: MP for Folkstone and Hythe. David Davies: MP for Haltemprice and Howden.And Countless more Lying Greedy BS Tories.

    http://brokenbritishpolitics.somplesite.com

    Like

  41. 146
    Nigel Evans boyfriend says:

    Is it true that back scuttle nige claimed for my ky

    Like

  42. 149
    gerrydorrian66 says:

    I found a “manifesto” (presumably satirical) on the web called the “Littoral Conversatives’ Framework Manifesto”. It had some good ideas, though, and one of these was that the pay and expenses of a Parliament should be set as the preceding Parliament’s last act. It would at least make for some good blogs!

    Like

  43. 150
    Captn P says:

    Of course they will bring this in immediately.

    And in another five years when the scandal breaks over MP’s employing each other spouses. We will have another round of hand wringing.

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

Yes Scotland’s Geo-Targeting Advertising Fail | MessageSpace
#IndyRef Twitter Map | Trendsmap
Westminster Has Patronised Scots | Scottish Sun
What Happens in the Event of a Recount? | Breitbart
Yes Side Emphatically Won Campaign | Speccie
Joyce Thacker on Sick Leave | Doncaster Free Press
Claire Perry Slams ‘Goodies’ for Scots | Sun
Westminster Truce Shatters | Times
Boris: Prime Minister By Monday | James Ford
Tories Say Don’t Bribe the Scots | Times
Dave Can’t Stay if Scots Go | Laura Perrins


VOTER-RECALL
Find out more about PLMR


The Prime Minister feels the pressure:

“I have to say that after the events I have been facing over the last few days, assassination would be a welcome release.”



It was only a tiny tiny collision.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,465 other followers