September 10th, 2013

Phillip Schofield Oblivious to Irony

This would be the same Phillip Schofield who cost ITV £125,000 in damages after smearing Lord McAlpine as a nonce…


38 Comments

  1. 1
    Ed Milicoward. says:

    This Morning is utter TRIPE. I never watch it! This Morning have turned ruining people’s into an art!

  2. 2
    Lukewarm says:

    The guy was accused of a crime, put on trial, justice was done and he was acquitted.
    Which bit is Philip Schofield complaining about? Which bit would he rather not happen? Maybe the police should have ignored the young girl’s claims? No. Maybe let him off without investigating? No.

    What a thick git…

  3. 3
    Blue Peter Goldfish says:

    Phillip Schofield admits he is a bloody ridiculous person :-)

  4. 4
    Shapps=shitehawk says:

    Well we all know that Lord McAlpine was completely exonerated in that particular virago but the mystery remains. Why did he not sue “Scallywag” who made extremely disturbing allegations against him? This article is readily available to peruse with just a little searching online.

  5. 5
    Irritable Sod says:

    Philip Schofield: a man of many opinions, quite a few of which (allegedly) are not valid.

  6. 6
    Lord Stansted says:

    That’s a media tosser for you. Fortunately I had not heard of Schofield before today, but I gather he’s on the telly.

  7. 7
    Gordon the Gopher says:

    I could tell you a thing or two about Phil – he kept me in a broom cupboard, the b*stard.

  8. 8
    East India Company Wallah says:

    What he meant was (people who appear on the telly-like himself-should not be scrutinised by mere oiks no matter the nature of the complaint)
    Turner will return to that crap bore fest and all the braindead who watch it will think no less of him- he will be fine

  9. 9
    Blue Peter Goldfish says:

    He didn’t have to sue, (or Sally) they all coughed up undisclosed amounts to settle out of court which I believe went to charity.

  10. 10
    Ed the Duck says:

    It was part of systematic abuse at the BBC…

  11. 11
    Blue Peter Goldfish says:

    When you get worsted by a knitted sock-puppet in the ratings it always rankles.

  12. 12
    Aydodge E. Scheisster QC says:

    They went b-a-n-k-r-u-p-t and presumably the editor and publisher have their own personal fortunes well-hidden in all sorts of asset-protection schemes– you wouldn’t go into that line of publishing if you thought the objects of your reporting could get to you personally on a libel judgment.

    Lord Ali Mac was just observing Willie Sutton’s Law– “You go where the money is” –not where it ain’t.

  13. 13
    Ed Milicoward. says:

    Philip Schofied is SCUM!

  14. 14
    Shapps=shitehawk says:

    Er no. This was much,much earlier than the sally bercow twittergate affair.He didn’t sue and didn’t donate any money to charity at that time. I dont know of the voracity of the claims but they are very difficult to read and troubling in their content.www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=60135‎

  15. 15
    this mornings rinsings says:

    hes a slimey git

  16. 16
    and now the weather says:

    who gives a …..

  17. 17
    Shapps=shitehawk says:

    Of course you’re absolutely correct. Who gives a …. Who could possibly care about kids being abused by adults whilst in Local Authority care? Arsehole!

  18. 18
    its a dead duck says:

    and gone

  19. 19
    Philip Schofield says:

    I have a list that I got off google, it’s a selective list.

  20. 20
    King Cnut says:

    Don’t you mean systemic?

  21. 21
    Though that is not difficult says:

    Nearly as well known as the Gopher puppet that regularly upstaged him.

  22. 22
    10.4 highway pa -TROLL says:

    yes and he has a shock of white hair long before time . He may be making a play for John Kerry’s job .

  23. 23
    Oi, Irritable Sod mate says:

    Only ‘quite a few’?

  24. 24
    Scottish Chav says:

    they would have been better employing the bl00dy gopher! At least he had integrity!

  25. 25
    Fuck Guido The Pe@do Protector says:

    L0rd M is a well known c h i ld bummer.

  26. 26
    ancientpopeye says:

    Suggesting that no TV “actor” or presenter should ever be charged with any crime or misdemeanour because he might be innocent.
    That would certainly empty the prisons.

  27. 27
    Anonymous says:

    What really worries me is that one assumes the producers of the said tripe know their audience.

  28. 28
    What a put down - says:

    “This would be the same Phillip Schofield who….”
    (Thanks for the reminder. I had forgotten that.)

  29. 29
    lojolondon says:

    Yes, but Lord McAlpine is a Tory, therefore open to abuse from the left wing media. Surely we all knew that?

  30. 30
    Scottish Chav says:

    did savile have his hand up gordons arrse as well?

  31. 31
    Klaus Henchmann says:

    The actor is in the clear. The Jury says so.

    Others seem not to need ‘proceedings’ taken to be found innocent of charges made against them.

    How does that work ?

  32. 32
    Laughing hangman says:

    Yes, he is thick but he tried to set up McCalpine to the world accusing him of the same thing, just using ‘the court of public opinion’ with no defence available. I’m glad it cost them £125,000.

  33. 33
    Anonymous says:

    Well the bit about 2 Drs not finding any evidence that the “victim” had been raped or any DNA evidence, i presume is what he was reffering to.

  34. 34
    Anonymous says:

    I thought scallywag went bankrupt, so no money was available.

  35. 35
    GDS says:

    Schofield is pigshit thick and probably can’t spell irony.

  36. 36
    Dark outside says:

    And now the weather says………..raping children is so last year. Cock.

  37. 37
    Cliff Pilchard says:

    Anybody got the contact details for Le Vell’s legal team?

  38. 38
    Lexander says:

    Schofield certainly can’t write correctly. I am amazed that he is still in a job.


Media Reader

Newspapers No Longer Willing to Toe Party Line | Roy Greenslade
London Live to Cut 20 Staff to Buy in More Content | Press Gazette
Telegraph Revealed Auschwitz 3 Years Before Liberation | Telegraph
Mirror Hacking: 50 Legal Action Claims | Press Gazette
45 Mirror Group Stories Linked to Phone-Hacking | Press Gazette
We Must Not Call Charlie Hebdo Killers ‘terrorists’ | Telegraph
Page 3 and the Art of the Self-Pity Statement | Guardian
Here is What a 7 Way Debate Sounds Like | BBC
Poll: Sun Readers Want Page 3 to Stay | Business Insider
The Sun: An Apology | Press Gazette
More Women Prosecuted For Telly Tax | Mail


Rising Stars
Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


Boris on British Jihadis. Apparently based on MI5 intel:

“If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn. They are literally w***ers. Severe onanists. They are tortured. They will be very badly adjusted in their relations with women, and that is a symptom of their feeling of being failures and that the world is against them. They are not making it with girls, and so they turn to other forms of spiritual comfort — which of course is no comfort.”


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,717 other followers