September 5th, 2013

Claire Perry Concedes Guido Didn’t “Sponsor” Hacking

Guido can now happily report that Tory MP Claire Perry has backed down after her bizarre claim that Guido ‘sponsored’ hacking pranksters who uploaded hardcore images onto the anti-porn campaigner’s website. Perry has conceded:

“For the purpose of clarity, I have never stated or indeed believe that you organised the hacking and am quite happy to make that view public.”

The government internet adviser’s offending tweets claiming that Guido sponsored the hacking have now been deleted after Guido’s lawyers demanded that she remove them and withdraw the crazy and technologically illiterate claims which she had made.

Guido would once again like to thank the team at Griffin Law for their work…


  1. 1
    Kulgan of Crydee says:

    Is she paying Guido’s legal costs? Or I suppose, is the taxpayer paying Guido’s legal costs?

  2. 2
    MI5 says:

    So Griffin Law are presentable are they?

    Nice to know…

    Difficult to find lawyers in London who are not bent…

  3. 3
    Mike Litorus says:

    Still would though.

  4. 4
    Carry Hole is a porcine homunculus says:

    UK ‘to spunk taxpayers cash’ on aid for Al Q in Syria.

  5. 5
    Dave says:

    No. Why would she? Nobody sued her.

  6. 6
    Jack says:

    Could you propose to Grffin Law the possibility of filing crimnal action against these law firms which threaten us and try and extort money from us for telling the truth?

    Could they establish the precdent sometime that harassment and attempted extortion of funds by London solicitors for our telling the truth is a criminal activity?

    That would advance the cause of freedom of expression greatly and take these abusive bums down a peg or two…

    I threatened such a firm last year with filing an action in a criminal court against them…there are one or two cases but not enough precedent yet…

    Never heard a pipseak from the criminals again…

  7. 7
    Harry the Bastard says:

    Thank god neither party got their kit off!!!

  8. 8
    Kulgan of Crydee says:

    Some costs incurred unless of course Guidos solicitors write their letters for free!!!

  9. 9
    Blue Peter Goldfish says:

    * innocent face *

  10. 10
  11. 11
    Grumpy Old Man says:

    Well if you did, and if she noticed, she would probably be very cross indeed.

  12. 12
    WSC says:

    In victory, magnanimity…

  13. 13
  14. 14
    Casual Observer says:

    Congrats and kudos to Guido.

  15. 15
    Anonymous says:

    She will get her tits out as compo….

  16. 16
    Marmite Soldier says:

    I still think that “I have never stated … that you organised the hacking” is bending the boundaries of truth somewhat bearing in mind her original tweets, but I would imagine that this is the nearest that she will do to a proper admission of fault and an apology.

  17. 17
    C Perry's Original Tweet says:

    “Apologies to anyone affected by the hacking of my website sponsored by @GuidoFawkes….”

  18. 18
    Casual Observer says:

    So the tail does not like it when the dog does the wagging ?

  19. 19
    Sir William Waad says:

    No apology?

  20. 20
    Jimmy says:

    So just to recap

    1. Guido boasts about suing Perry
    2. Guido is not in fact going to sue Perry. Imagine my surprise.
    3. In Guidoworld this constitutes Perry backing down.

    Number of legal actions threatened by Guido so far: 94 (DWP estimate)
    Number actually commenced: 0

  21. 21
    Brent Fraser says:

    Sorry seems to be the hardest word

  22. 22
    Jimmy says:

    Rumpole of the Blaney is Guido’s #1 choice for all his imaginary litigation needs.

  23. 23
    Sweet f*cking Christ on a bike says:

    “The government internet adviser’s .. technologically illiterate claims”

    Positive discrimination strikes again..

  24. 24
    I used to support Labour but I grew up says:

    Number of jobs Jimmy’s applied for since losing his disability bennies: 14
    Number of those Jimmy was actually suitable for: 0
    Number of bennies Jimmy’s little grasping hands still clings on to: ?

  25. 25
    I d on't n eed no d octor says:

    But Guido has backed down. From Guido’s bluster I thought he was going to sue Perry.

  26. 26
    Anonymous says:

    Probably felt sorry for her.

  27. 27
    Jimmy says:

    I don’t think she asked for one did she?

  28. 28
    Fuck the LibLabCon says:

    I would.

  29. 29
    Annifrid Lyngstad says:

    And how coud I ever refuse?
    I feel like I win when I lose.

  30. 30
    Jabba Le Chat says:

  31. 31
    Henry IX says:

    Show us your duckies Lady Claire.

  32. 32
    Displaced Brummie says:

    Or to put it another way, she did state it but did not mean what she stated, as she did not know what she was talking about.

    So in this instance, ignorance is a defence.

    “Just because you break up with someone, you don’t stop loving them…” Errr. right…

    And there was nobody else involved. Of course! Some people just movfe on very, very quickly.

    Claire Perry has an over active interest in the sex lives of others. Displacement activity, perhaps?

  33. 33
    Captain Wales says:

    Those teeth could give one a nasty little nibble, dontcha think?

  34. 34
    Mumsnet says:

    Claire ! How could you ?!?

  35. 35
    Fido the Doggy Stylist says:

    Woof Woof !!!

  36. 36
    Cleavage & Co., Builders R Us says:

    You’re twenty fourth in the queue, mate.

  37. 37
    Witty Moniker says:

    Even better if she’s angry. I mean, look at the photo! Phwooar!

  38. 38
    Witty Moniker says:

    “For the purpose of clarity”? B*ll*x. For the purpose of having calmed down, and not making an even bigger idiot of herself and not getting sued.

  39. 39
    Maq­boul says:

    I think they work pro Bono.

  40. 40


    Blaney wins again.



  41. 41
    Borris says:

    She’d notice with me alright.

  42. 42

    This shows more naivety than Guido would expect from you, if your lawyers get what you want without going to Court that is a good victory.

  43. 43
    Babycham says:

    Shut up. Bend over, and think of England.

  44. 44
    Maq­boul says:

    Usually the threat of legal force, 99 times out of 100, achieves the desired result as it appeared to do in this case.

  45. 45
    10.4 highway patrol says:

    no such animal a sa a free m’learned friend .

    a bit like a free lunch .

    figments of an overactive imagination or thyroid or both .

  46. 46
    Jimmy says:

    Struggling with this one I’m afraid. What do you mean by “wins”? Come to think of it, what do you mean by “again”?

  47. 47
    10.4 highway patrol says:

    go back to your vauxhall cross or curzon street or the connaught oe wherever it is you carry out your very expensive spooking from these days .

  48. 48
    Maq­boul says:

    If she asked I’m sure that Guido would give her one. I would.

  49. 49
    Anonymous says:

    Best thing would be to sue her for something anyway.

    After all, she’s a tory. And a thick bird.

  50. 50
    Jimmy says:

    So you didn’t want an apology or damages or costs you just wanted her to deny libelling you? Again?

    I suppose the important thing is that you’re happy. I imagine for Ms. Perry the sting of defeat will soon pass too.

  51. 51
    Maq­boul says:

    They’ve just had some free advertising on this blog, visited by 100,000+ persons per week.

  52. 52
    Tay King-dePisse says:

    Knowing our host, probably Rumpoles of the Bailey’s Cream are his “Learned Friends” who often conduct his cases at bar.

  53. 53
    Teasy weasy says:

    Is “displacement” a polite way of saying “goes like a fucking train”?

  54. 54
    10.4 highway patrol says:

    the winner takes it all annie . ….as you well know sitting in the middle of your private island … or is that agnethe.

  55. 55
    Jimmy says:

    Well they do say there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Although I imagine it’s not a common expression at the libel bar.

  56. 56
    Teasy weasy says:

    If you ask her nicely, she’ll take them out.

  57. 57
    10.4 highway patrol says:

    who is this new voice on the singing firmament called robin THICKE ?

    which agent thought up that stage name ?

    though i hear he s earning shedloads so perhaps the agent was prescient after

  58. 58
    Fred says:

    You are struggling alright.

  59. 59
    PC Dixon says:

    Took Lawyers to come clean Guido – Amazing how dishonest these MP’s are – obviously she didn’t believe in the truth till she got their letter

  60. 60
    Daft bint says:

    ‘Technologicaly illiterate’ LOL

  61. 61
    M'Learned Friend says:

    It was all an obvious try on. To sustain a claim for defamation you would have to prove that your reputation has been damaged. That raises two interesting questions:
    1. Whether anyone would have paid any attention whatsoever to the nonsense spouted by La Perry. Since, in Guido’s view (which is probably shared by the world) La Perry’s tweets were obviously crazy and technologically illierate, the answer to that question could only have been “no”. So no claim for that reason.
    2. Would Guido’s reputation have been damaged even if people had paid any heed to La Perry? Possibly only if he had taken himself too seriously by pursuing the matter further, since people might then (wrongly) have assumed that Guido was a rather pompous fellow who enjoys dishing it out but doesn’t like getting any in return.

    In the meantime, well-done to Guido for republishing (above) the content of the allegedly offending tweets.

    Time to visit El Vino’s methinks …

  62. 62
    Old Blue Eyes says:

    Hey Guido, why is she not tagged as “totty watch”.

  63. 63

    You’re gutted she complied aren’t you?

  64. 64

    Cash money wins. Spondulicks Jimmy, filthy lucre, loadsamoney.

  65. 65
    Jimmy says:

    3. What reputation?

    “In the meantime, well-done to Guido for republishing (above) the content of the allegedly offending tweets.”

    Noticed that. They’re also referenced on the original post which links to at least one other site hosting them. On the other hand, and let’s be fair, Blaney did get a six week old tweet deleted, so that’s money well spent. Anyone who wants a vintage tweet deleted, and feels too shy just to ask, the firm’s link is in the OP.

  66. 66
    Jimmy says:

    Complied with what? She denied libelling you six weeks ago and now she’s denied it again. Are you going to ask her her in another six weeks if she still denies it just to be sure?

  67. 67
    Mike Litorus says:

    I like to think that photo is her telling me off before she spanks me.

  68. 68
    Jimmy says:

    Fair point. How much did you give him?

  69. 69
    Connysewer says:

    She’s getting a bit past it for totty. Does quite well in the milfy stakes though.

  70. 70

    She deleted the tweets making the allegations. She stated clearly that she didn’t mean to suggest Guido was responsible and, err, Guido is still a Sun columnist. She didn’t come out of the tussle with her reputation enhanced did she? Maybe to you that is a terrible defeat for Guido. In truth, no doubt we would all have liked to see her sing an apology like Clegg whilst dancing around in nipple tassles, but, hey, we can’t have everything.

  71. 71
    Anonymous says:

    She’s a 6, and that’s being generous.

  72. 72
    Truth seeker says:

    Oh god, not him as well. What more in the name of love.

  73. 73
    Anonymous says:

    That first article explains a lot – clearly she’s far too busy for her own kids, preferring to pack them off as boarders, so she wants to interfere in how other people bring their offspring up.

    Talk about over compensating.

  74. 74
    Anonymous says:

    She really doesn’t.

  75. 75
    Beer Goggles says:

    Can’t be too fussy. Needs must.

  76. 76
    Penfold says:

    “”” I have never stated”””

    Well, if that is true, why sic the legal dawgs on her.?

    Is she being economical with her apology?
    If so, it’s not an apology…..

  77. 77
    Anonymous says:

    Not a terrible defeat but hardly a victory when what conceded occurred 6 weeks ago.

    Nipple tassles would have been good.

  78. 78
    superman says:

    More money for the lawyers! We didn’t believe her. She is a Tory MP. Why waste money?

  79. 79
  80. 80
    gildedtumbril says:

    I detest lawyers. I have actually met two who were honest.
    I confess, I like the name Griffin Law. I am not sure why…

  81. 81
    BedroomSilk says:

    The original tweets from the Rt Hon Claire Perry may be bullshit and they may also be deleted but they are still not invisible or evaporated. M’learned friends have plenty to go on.

  82. 82
    Displaced Brummie says:

    You might say that. And me? I might be tempted to agree.

  83. 83
    Displaced Brummie says:

    Yeah. Husband out. Kids out. Lover in. Nice.

Seen Elsewhere

Users of Gay Hook-Up App Grindr Infected | TechnoGuido
ISIS Raising Funds Online Using Bitcoin | TechnoGuido
UKIP’s Youth Challenge | BBC
ISIS Operative: This Is How We Send Jihadis To Europe | BuzzFeed
Shapps Defends Bashir Defection | Seb Payne
Tory Leadership Contenders Jostle Over Europe | Alex Wickham
Cutting Taxes is Good For You | Art Laffer
Suspects Will Now Have to Prove Innocence | Laura Perrins
Labour Cllr: Cops Shouldn’t Stop Petrol Thieves | HandF Forum
Creeping Cultural Acceptance of Anti-Semitism | Eric Pickles
Time For Greece to Leave Eurozone | Allister Heath

Rising Stars
Find out more about PLMR AD-MS

Boris on British Jihadis. Apparently based on MI5 intel:

“If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn. They are literally w***ers. Severe onanists. They are tortured. They will be very badly adjusted in their relations with women, and that is a symptom of their feeling of being failures and that the world is against them. They are not making it with girls, and so they turn to other forms of spiritual comfort — which of course is no comfort.”

Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:


AddThis Feed Button

Guido Reads

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,716 other followers