May 1st, 2013

Tory MP Demands Ed Sacks Ken For Boston Bombing Slur

24 hours after Guido reported that Ken had blamed America for the Boston bombings on Iranian state television, and still he has escaped reprimand. Tory MP Brooks Newmark has now written to Ed demanding he be sacked from Labour’s NEC:

“I find it wholly reprehensible for Mr Livingstone to link the Boston bombings to Western intervention in the Middle East. In doing so, he suggests that the actions of the two Boston bombers were justified and excusable. I am sure that both you and the Labour Party agree that terrorism, which in this case killed three innocent people and injured many others, is never justified and never excusable.

He also intimates that America itself was responsible for the bombings. I am sure that you will also agree with me that the only two people responsible for the bombings were the terrorists themselves.

As a member of Labour’s NEC, Mr Livingstone has been placed in a position of responsibility and influence within your Party. As leader of the Labour Party, I call on you to condemn these disgusting remarks and remove Mr. Livingstone from your NEC. I know you will want to do so as soon as possible to make clear that neither you nor the Labour Party condones such beliefs.”

Your move, Ed…


74 Comments

  1. 1
    Bfreesun says:

    Not justified, but perhaps explained

  2. 2
    ed millibanderer says:

    will i bollocks,,kens as sound as a pound,,

  3. 3
    Red Ken Lyingscum says:

    Piss be upon you.


  4. 4
    Raving Loon says:

    The actions of the terrorists of course are not excusable, our intervention in the middle east DOES inflame hatred against us.

  5. 5
    Observer says:

    What the twerp says and what he means are distinct.

    He conveys to me that he hates the US and the West in a way and to a degree that he does not hate (non-Christian) religious fundamentalists and their attendant terrorists.

  6. 6
    Rob Wilson says:

    Has his letter been placed in the public domain?

  7. 7
    Milishambles says:

  8. 8
    Milishambles says:

    Without a hint of irony, he says “I’m clear about this”. :-D

  9. 9
    T.B£iar - the People's Messiah says:

    Why ?? We’re still seeking out those Weapons of Mass Destruction. They should be grateful to me for ordering the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

  10. 10
    Someone make this woman PM now!!! says:

  11. 11
    Ed Balls - Shallow Chancer says:

    As clear as mud, like all our policies.

  12. 12
    Perse O'Nally says:

    Ed hasn’t got the backbone to do anything about Ken.

  13. 13
    Jorge Orwell says:

    And the odds of red Ed even apologising for Livingstone are worse than Cameron being PM in 2016!

  14. 14
    Pat's the man! says:

    Pat tells it like it is.

  15. 15

    Indeed.

    When you look at the cause and effects, at a conceptual level, he has a point. If you invade sovereign nations, some theirin are going to fight back, just as the resistance, SOE etc did in ww2.

  16. 16
    Wurzel says:

    Sack him!! – The bastard should be hung up by the balls for a week then shot.

  17. 17

    So you can then get a job as middle east ambassador? How does that work?

  18. 18
    Ah! Monika says:

    CHEEKY Gwyneth Paltrow has revealed how to end a row with a man: “Give him a blow job.”

    The star, 40, married to Coldplay’s Chris Martin, 36, gave the tip at a party.

    She blushed when her advice was recalled by US TV host Chelsea Handler, who was also at the bash.

    She giggled: “What if my mum is watching?”

    ERR She could always close her eyes :)

  19. 19
    Speaking of Piss says:

  20. 20
    genghiz the kahn says:

    Ken is moving into a new day centre in the country with the exclusive RG45 7EG postcode.

  21. 21
    Gerry Adams says:

    “I am sure that both you and the Labour Party agree that terrorism, which in this case killed three innocent people and injured many others, is never justified and never excusable.

    It worked for the IRA

  22. 22
    Tosspot says:

    New Labor but still Old Communism, If Red Ed ever became PM, this would really enhance him with the Americans..

    Thus if you really want to destroy this Country and insult our friends, vote Labor

  23. 23
    Steve P says:

    A tory MP is leader of the Labour Party?

    Who knew?

  24. 24
    What are we fighting for? says:

    And this conservative MP, what has he to say about the three soldiers killed and the others injured in Afghanistan today?

  25. 25
    Silly little man says:

    How does Brooks Newmark know that which he claims is indeed the truth of the incident?

  26. 26
    get rid of them all says:

    Ken has a point, it just 100% doesn’t need saying in this context because firstly we do not know (yet) the motivations in this case and secondly – and more generally – it is so obvious to anyone with half a brain that if powerful nations wage war via bomb and bullet against a particular region of the world then some people in that region or who share the predominant religion might get a bit pissed off and start doing things like this.

    the fact less of them were doing it before is neither here nor there, this is about the here and now.

  27. 27
    Stuf the LibLabCon says:

    Perhaps Ken is not being PC but he’s right though.

  28. 28

    I don’t know about you, given your recent remark to me (which I charitably imagined to be a troll), but I have no intention whatsoever of following her advice…

  29. 29
    Are you listening Nick? says:

  30. 30
    The EUSSR is corrupt and it is backed by the USA says:

    Quite.

    If Germany had invaded England i’m sure any bombers on german soil would be regarded as freedom fighters.

  31. 31
    AlbaMale says:

    I’m no fan of Ken Livingstone and never will be and I’m not too sure exactly what he said.

    However, I am curious about Brooks Newmark’s expression “In doing so, he suggests that the actions of the two Boston bombers were justified and excusable.”

    I recently read an item by Michael Scheuer on the difference between ’cause’ and ‘motivation’ at: http://lewrockwell.com/scheuer/scheuer21.1.html

    Maybe Ken and Brooks should have a read just to be clear in their own minds?

  32. 32
    Anonymous says:

    He’s not even sure if he’s got his shoes on the right feet what a f_cking twat! It’s only Dave Light Weight that even gives him half a chance of getting in no.10

  33. 33
    Silly little man says:

    Don’t worry, they’ll get a murmur during PMQs one of these fine weeks when the fuckers decide to turn up for work and the PM promises never to forget them.

  34. 34
    Miranda says:

    Very Nicely thank you

  35. 35

    Except the attacks on the US embassies, the attack on the destroyer with suicide boats and the twin towers/pentagon/white house attacks came BEFORE either Iraq or Afghanistan.

    The first world trade centre attack was in the 1990’s.

    The hatred of the US has been a whipped up by arabs since the 1940’s.
    When the US intervened in Egypt to stop the UK and French/I-zzies The Egyptians were proclaiming that US warplanes had bombed Cairo and 10,000 people killed.

    There were no bombs on cairo. No casualties and the US had not a single military unit involved in any way.

    We all know, but forget, or choose to forget, that the new spark for Islamic nutterhood came from Iraq war one and the Saddam invasion. It was US bases on sacred Saudi soil and infidel women driving Humvees that sent the beardies into religious meltdown.

    Now, clearly , Iraq 2 was an attack for political and economic ends and has inflamed an already angry religion, with quite a lot of justification, but the attacks on America came before the attacks on Afghan/Iraq.

  36. 36
    Fruitcake racist says:

    Britain was quite safe from attacks by Muslim bombers until B LIAR poked his nose and his monstrous ego in Iraq and Afghanistan, that bastard and slimy chancer Campbell are responsible for the deaths of thousands.

    What would you do if your country was invaded by a foreign power, would you just sit back and take it?

  37. 37
    Real world says:

    Because Ken goes out of his way with support for homosexuals, but is prepared to work for a state sponsored TV, a state that murders homosexuals. Then uses a tax system for his earnings that evades paying full tax.

    What part of hypocrite don’t you understand!

  38. 38
    Casual Observer says:

    The poor guys and the 441 others have died for nothing, together with all those injured.

    When will the likes of Bliar and Camercnut understand that you cannot have a “nice” war. You either go in and totally crush the enemy, or don’t go to war at all.

  39. 39
    Fuck Off Dave says:

    When will any M.P. have the guts to ask Camercnut the names of the dead soldiers at P.M.Q.s one week after the lying bastard’s “never forget them” crocodile tear statement, when the fucker hasn’t got the names on the notes the SPADs cobbled together for him?

  40. 40
    Bricktop says:

    The dead & injured in Boston were no doubt completely innocent of any wrongdoing, real or imagined – can the same be said of the rest of the populace who have over the years added to the coffers of the IRA & assisted in various acts of terror on the British mainland ? Google Irish in Boston to see how many claiming ancestry there, and how much they still hate the English.One mans freedom fighter…..

  41. 41

    Doesn’t matter much, its just politics.

    A while back, ineffectual Ed, used to call for either a judge-led inquiry or a resignation every week. It was a way of disguising Labour’s lack of any policies. It was so common that many commenters here joked “Wesign! Wesign! ” to any comment made by another.

    Then CCHQ got fed up and decided to play the hypocrite party at their own game and so now any gaffe, U-turn, out right lie by the reds is given an extreme overreaction, self important, Guardian style tirade of morality.

    It achieves little, but it has stopped Ed calling for a cabinet head each week.

  42. 42
    Simples says:

    What would you do if armed drones attack you, controlled in the U.K. or U.S.A. ?
    Retaliate with low tech. atrocities in their cities of course.

  43. 43
    Alex says:

    Nothing will happen to Ken. If he’d said something nasty about one of their own, a la Galloway on Blair, he could probably expect expulsion, but not for this.

    He’s got away with equally offensive comments time and time again in the past.

  44. 44
    Bob Fleming says:

    Remind me to get into a row with Gwyneth Paltrow sometime..

  45. 45
    Miliband the Amoeba says:

    I can’t sack him, Ken McCluskey will shout at me.

  46. 46
    Ed Hunter says:

    Wait until Martha gets hold of you again. She understands.

  47. 47
    TB outbreak says:

    Importunely.

  48. 48
    Tax Dodges R Us says:

    Was Ken speaking in his personal capacity or as a representative of Silveta Ltd ?

  49. 49
    Labour Apiarist says:

    We urgently need a Bee Plan.

  50. 50
    Morgan's Organ says:

    Lets see if Ed has got the Balls to do ir!

  51. 51
    Nadine says:

    Just as the Germans fought back against britain after we declared war on them in 1939

  52. 52
    G. Ographee says:

    Plus, these two oiks were from Chechnya, somewhere the Yanks have been nowhere near. It was the Russkies who kicked off there; and I don’t think they Russians are usually described as ‘western’.

  53. 53
    Libertarian says:

    Surely he can say what he likes. It’s free country.

    Isn’t it?

  54. 54
    G. Ographee says:

    Lots of sovereign nations in the middle east are now in turmoil because the natives got extremely restive and decided they no longer wanted their particular flavour of dictator. Nothing to do with the west – they did, and are doing it all on their own (mostly).

  55. 55
    G. Ographee says:

    Iran? Nope, don’t think so. If he calls one of them mullah fellows a raving loony terry wrist he is likely to find himself dangling in the breeze atop a crane.

  56. 56
    Koba says:

    Can he be deported back to the horrible place he came from?

  57. 57
    Libertarian says:

    Good point! We can only live in hope that he accidentally calls one of those people a vile barbarian throwback.

  58. 58
    Windy Miller says:

    Because he was born in the USA and (surprise, surprise) he is a 5 to 2.

  59. 59
    Ken Livingslime. says:

    What is Ken doing on Iranian TV? Is he a t€rro!st recruitment officer for AQ? What a fucking tube he is.

  60. 60
    Tehran Calling, Tehran Calling says:

    Red Ken=Quisling=William Joyce=Lord Haw Haw=?

  61. 61
    parisclaims says:

    . I am sure that both you and the Labour Party agree that terrorism, which in this case killed three innocent people and injured many others, is never justified and never excusable.

    What makes you so sure?

  62. 62
    Pentangelis says:

    Whilst Ken is a bit premature in linking the Boston Bombers in this way; notwithstanding that, he does have a valid point.
    How on earth are we (the West) to expect international respect when we behave in the way we have and probably in the way that we still are.
    I am certainly no fan of Mr. Livingstone, but I do think in this case his demonisation is not warranted.

  63. 63

    Wanna terrorist for a neighbour……….vote Labour….innit!

  64. 64
    Anonymous says:

    Is it not wholly reprehensible that Mr Newmark – despite being born in the USA – seems to know little about the CIA term “Blowback”?

  65. 65
    Anonymous says:

    The CIA have a term for what Ken it talking about – “Blowback”.

  66. 66
    Anonymous says:

    But Tony and his mates, having told the nation that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction – that could be fired within 45 mins – has yet to tell us where they are. Truly, Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word.

  67. 67
    Anonymous says:

    And yet, unlike your comment, when has this site had ever had any interest in reasoned debate?

  68. 68
    Anonymous says:

    And yet Tony Blair was warned that any war on Iraq could trigger a “substantial” increase in terrorism against the UK… . That by invading Iraq, Britain and America had given al Qaeda a powerful recruiting tool. “Arguably we gave Osama Bin Laden his Iraqi Jihad. So that he was able to move into Iraq in a way that he wasn’t before,”.

    Eliza Manningham-Buller, former director-general of MI5. (Hardly Lady Haw Haw?)

  69. 69
    Anonymous says:

    Who but a certain class say “oiks”? Give yourselves away – yet again.

  70. 70
    Daily Male says:

    What, and take time to consider what he REALLY said – that will never do.

  71. 71
    Anonymous says:

    Thank you for your telling comment.

  72. 72
    Anonymous says:

    What, vote for the clowns?

  73. 73
    Anonymous says:

    While, for some reason, the press have not printed whole text, it is possible to find some quotes on web.

    “Very often, people get incredibly angry about injustices that they see”.

    “They would have been reading about the torture at Guantanamo Bay, at Baghram airbase. They would have read stuff about how, I think it is 54 different countries secretly collaborated with America for this rendition — people being snatched off streets taken to be tortured, because the Bush regime believed that they were all potential terrorists.”

    “There was such ignorance in the Bush White House about Islam and about the history of so many disputes that exist in the Middle East. People get angry — they lash out, … It’s the whole squalid intervention that has disfigured the record of the Western democracies. I think this fuels the anger of the young men, who — as we saw in Boston — went out, and, out of anger and demand for revenge, claimed lives in the West.”

  74. 74
    Pentangelis says:

    Probably very rarely, but it quite gratifying sometimes to be reasoned – not too often mind you!


Seen Elsewhere

NiMo Grovels to Blob | Chris McGovern
UKIP’s Modern, Internationalist Agenda | Douglas Carswell
Beeb Bias is Counterproductive | Nicholas Booth
Bercow Blames Colleagues for Clerk Mess | Guardian
Tony Benn Too Left-Wing For Soviet Union | Telegraph
Mrs Danczuk’s Festive Treat | Sun
Hollande Forced to Ditch Super-Tax | Mail
1 in 3 Back UKIP Over Chinky-Gate | Breitbart
Ed Miliband Taken Hostage | Worcester News
This Brilliant Coalition, Apart from Craig Oliver | Peter Oborne
Digital Politics: Standing Still Faster | Rafael Behr


Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


Peter Oborne makes a bold prediction

“I predict that Labour and the Conservatives will win between them a higher proportion of seats than at any election since 1992.”


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,650 other followers