March 22nd, 2013

Breaking: + + + Amendment to Protect Bloggers Put Down + + +

blogoffWith only a few hours to go before the 3 pm deadline Guido is hearing that Lord Lucas is putting down an amendment to exclude small independent bloggers from the regulatory burden of the Royal Charter. The amendment is based on the wording proposed by BigBrotherWatch (see here).

The aim is to insert a new Schedule into the Crime and Courts Bill:

‘Exclusions from definition of “relevant publisher”

“A publisher who does not exceed the definition of a small or medium-sized enterprise as defined in Section 382 and 465 Companies Act 2006.”

This effectively takes out all small independent bloggers and re-calibrates the legislation to only cover what Tom Watson rightly calls “Big Media”. Hopefully this will command cross-party support…


99 Comments

  1. 1
    Grauniad says:

    So as we are not big media by any stretch of the imagination we will be excluded then?

    Like

    • 2
      Grow Up says:

      So what happens when Guido becomes a big blogger?

      Like

      • 9

        Then he’ll pay no attention to that either.

        Its worth noting that in large part the MP’s desire for blogger’s inclusion was aimed squarely at this site. When politicians are told “Blogger” they hear “Guido” and would have liked to see him brought under control..

        Like

        • 42
          V1le, vicious Labour ruined my Country says:

          They should scrap the whole thing. Existing laws are adequate.

          Like

          • Morgan's Organ says:

            You might blag a blogger part of the time but you can’t blag a blogger all of the time!!!

            Like

          • Curly says:

            Yes, cross-party support should include the words “bugger off Grant and Milipede”.

            Like

          • The Old Fella says:

            That will not affect you Geedo, yours is not small enough “This week 109,678 visitors visited 355,979 times viewing 629,946 pages”, hardly a small blog and read by only a few

            Like

      • 12
        Brutalist archetype says:

        When? He already is, and he’s far from independent with his newspaper column.

        Like

    • 6
      TOM FATSON says:

      How about LARGE independent bloggers

      Like

      • 8
        Grrr says:

        Socialists are generally only after power and money. Bloggers aren’t a good target.

        Like

        • 34
          I am not a number says:

          You forget, socialists also need to shut down all dissent. Dissent is the thing they fear above all else, because it offers an alternative world view, the comrades can’t compete against. Freedom.

          Like

        • 37
          blub says:

          They’re also pretty keen on no-one pointing out their misdeeds. They know the BBC will keep quiet so what’s left?

          Like

      • 13
        Fat Mammas says:

        I doubt anyone could say that Guido is on the small side.

        Is mums net Big or Small?

        Like

    • 25
      Solomon Again says:

      So here’s the trick.

      A blogger who has very little money. Probably using a free blogging platform. You can sue him/her for welfare/pension money. They are unlikely to go in for chequebook journalism.
      A bit like a madman ranting in the street.
      Nothing to lose – Nothing you can do.

      A blogger who can be traced/connected to the rich and powerful. Paid for Blog site. Clearly have resources behind them – You can sue the pants off them- Jail them

      It is not hard to differentiate between these types of blog.

      Like

      • 48
        Sunny Hundal says:

        I’m not a madman ranting in the street..I’m more of a sage. A divine prophet..showering enlightenment on the masses whilst holding up a big sign declaring “GOLF SALE – 200yds”

        Like

      • 52
        I am not a number says:

        Do you really imagine for one moment that a ‘rich and powerful’ media outlet would leave it’s digital fingerprints online?

        Anything dodgy would be farmed out to alternative, semi-anonymous website bloggers that link to each other and who individually, could not be touched, or simply left as a link on a major competitor site. The law is idiotic and entirely irrational.

        Like

        • 58
          Operation Crossbow says:

          That already happens. The papers have a toxic story but can’t report it,they then leak it online and then report on the leak. How do you think all those leaks about super injunctions got online?

          Like

          • Solomon Again says:

            Digital forensics.

            Everything is recorded.

            If only you knew…..

            But that’s another story

            Like

        • 94
          The Old Fella says:

          That sounds a bit like this blog, Ruppy lets go the dogs of war, of course he did not do anything, it was that blogging person

          Like

    • 54
      Anonymous says:

      What a cop out. Either the principle of free speech applies to all or none at all !

      Another bugger’s muddle – no surprise there when looking at the composition of this government.

      Like

  2. 3
    Hugh Grant says:

    I feel Divine.

    Like

  3. 4
    hugh grant says:

    i,ll scweam and scweam !!!!

    Like

  4. 5
    Vince Cable says:

    I don’t remember blogs.

    Like

  5. 7
    MPs = Waste of Space or so it seems says:

    How come everyone is using Lords and Royals these days, Have they given up with the democratically elected?

    Like

    • 22
      Tay King-dePisse says:

      The democratically-elected have given up on YOU, more like. And in the case of many of the people in the UK, with good reason.

      Like

    • 23
      Chris Rennard 13th Duke of Wimborne says:

      Young ladies..in a state of heightened excitement..at a conference..with the champagne flowing and the hands and tongues loose?

      Did no one think of the consequences ?

      Like

    • 95
      The Old Fella says:

      It comes down to this doesn’t it

      Like

  6. 10
    Anonymous says:

    Ha ha ha, cunning, everyone can now escape this silly act by restructuring their publishing bit into an SME, the definition of a medium enterprise is pretty large if I remember correctly!

    Like

  7. 11
    Anonymous says:

    The hereditaries are the guardians of our civil liberties against a mix of placemen and elected totalitarians.

    Like

  8. 14
    Tay King-dePisse says:

    That’s right, girls and boys, don’t ever aspire to become big-time! So long as you stay small or medium, they can’t touch you!

    Is this the spirit that made Britain “Great,” I put it to you?

    Like

  9. 15
    who why what where when says:

    Good for blogs.

    But regulation of newspapers and news magazines is still totally unacceptable and must be resisted.

    Any newspaper signing up to the Hacked Off charter would lose all credibility with it’s readers.

    Like

    • 20
      Mine d'Boggles says:

      Oh yes! Readers. I remember them, faintly, back in the mists of time.

      Like

    • 96
      The Old Fella says:

      OK let them print what they like and when they print libellous articles make the fine unlimited, job done.

      Like

  10. 16
    Gordon Brown says:

    Gimme all your lovin
    All your hugs and kisses too

    Like

    • 40
      Gordon on bass says:

      “Its my {labour} party and I’ll lie if I want to, lie if I want to…you would lie too if they laughed at you.”

      Like

  11. 18
    David Roughly says:

    Don’t make me angry. You wouldn’t like me when I’m angry.

    Like

  12. 21
    Sum of the Parts says:

    So this is now down to small publishers. I take it the Telegraph could divide itself into a hive of small publishers each one exempt from Hugh, Ed and Dave’s new law?

    Like

  13. 24
    cowboy builder says:

    I want to make Tommo into a cross party support.

    Like

  14. 26
    world's gone mad says:

    So hundreds of years of press freedom is snatched away from the British public in a secret 2am meeting between Lib/Lab politicians and unelected Hacked Off weirdos.
    Then it’s all rushed through with unseemly haste.What a way to run a country that has always prided itself on freedom.

    Like

  15. 27
    damned impertinent questions says:

    Even better, If a big company sets up a comment section with rules that say whoever publishes on here does so on their own behalf, its arguable that the Thought Police cannot regulate them

    Like

    • 51
      Thought Police says:

      We’ll have to think about this.
      BTW this police thought is only open Monday and Tuesday mornings.9-1pm.
      Please only think unconscionable thoughts during these times.

      Like

  16. 28
    Fat benefits layabout says:

    Itz ow I woz brout upp, 2 spennd mi bennerfitz monee onn cigarets annd cyder. Iff yu wunt 2 wirk, thatz ur choyce. Mi choyce iz 2 by cigs andd drinc.

    Like

  17. 29
    Hacked Off and Max Mosely says:

    Do what we want or we’ll cut your wires.

    Like

  18. 30
    damned impertinent questions says:

    weirdos?

    Just because I like women dresssed in rubber and leather whipping me does not mean I am weird. I will fill in a complaint form right now

    Like

  19. 31
    Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein says:

    We’ve solved the problem, we are issuing a Fatwa on Hugh Grant!

    Like

  20. 32
    damned impertinent questions says:

    “cut your wires”

    Is that an euphemism for a harder form of bondage? Sounds fun

    Like

  21. 33
    DO NOT COMPROMISE. Go For Broke says:

    Guido.

    I don’t really like your fix as it is a compromise. Freedom of speech should not be compromised.

    Instead of limiting a bad law it would be preferable to stop the bad law from becoming a law.

    Like

    • 41

      Self-defence is the first priority. Do nothing because the deal is not ideal is a bit too dangerous. No one has argued against the whole thrust of Leveson more than Guido.

      Like

  22. 35
    Anonymous says:

    So hacked off got what they wanted… after introducing a red herring to draw everybody’s attention…

    Like

    • 46
      Hacked off win with this compromise by the blogosphere says:

      +1

      The blogosphere are amending this bad law to save their own skins and as a result they will not object to the amendment (which Hacked off wanted) from going through.

      Like

    • 76
      Anonymous says:

      Exactly – introduce a proposal in which you were never interested in but which gets everyone up in arms. Magnanimously back down whilst simultaneously getting the bulk of the proposals that you really wanted passed with nary a whisper.

      You’ve just been played Guido and you don’t even know it.

      Like

  23. 38
    RedLorry says:

    If it doesn’t, then you know what the game is.

    They are after you.

    Like

  24. 39
    PCC says:

    What is the maximum weight of a small blogger?

    Like

  25. 43
    Blowing Whistles says:

    Any amendment and that Charter MUST be written in plain simple English – and not shrouded in legalese whereby a judge could interpret it any way he likes if he just happens to be sympathetic (or blackmailed) to some monied up mogul.

    Like

  26. 44
    Hank The cat says:

    Breaking: + + + Amendment to Protect Bloggers Put Down + + + Amendment should Read Politicians

    Like

  27. 45
    Anonymous says:

    No No No No No!

    Yes, this turns it into an acceptable proposal, but it’s crossing the line

    … First they came for the large enterprises.

    Like

  28. 49
    @BBCPropaganda says:

    Great! Instead of people suing me to take my blog down they will be suing Google to take my blog down.

    That helps me how?

    Like

  29. 50
    WVM says:

    But you have a column in the Sun Guido, how does that work?

    Like

  30. 53
    BBC says:

    We are very disappointed, they should all be shut down apart from us, long live Labour and the glorious EU.

    Like

  31. 56
    Compromise and you lose says:

    You have fallen into the trap Guido.

    Hugh Ed and Dave will not object to this amendment as it means they get the repressive law they wanted all along.

    A few years down the line then the government of the day can tweak it to include blogs and twitter or whatever else exists then.

    No..You must fight this bad ill conceived totalitarian all the way and not sell your soul for a tid bit.

    Like

  32. 59
    Loopy Lou says:

    If you get this amendment then if a big paper has a story it does not fancy then all it has to do is pass it onto Guido and just mention Guidos blog in passing .

    Someone is going to have lots and lots of fun with all this especially if they like dressing up in wigs and gowns.

    Like

  33. 60
    Moussa Koussa Mark 7 says:

    And we all thought you were the biggest most influential blogger in the sphere….LOL

    Like

  34. 64
    Mahatmacoat says:

    Peace my Negros, It’s all lies in the newspapers!

    I want real stories, like IDS beating his wife and Mr Hague’s outing.

    Like

  35. 66
    Petronella Fazackerley says:

    They can pass all the laws they like but I will still think that Cameron is a shifty rich bastard who is not as sharp as he thinks.

    Like

  36. 70
    (I don't need no doctor) says:

    Miliband and Clegg may still join forces to force more stringent laws on the press than the proposed Royal Chater does.
    It still amazes me how Hacked Off could be in Miliband’s office, and included in the decision making. What was that all about?
    Maybe it’s a cunning ploy by Cameron, feed Miliband and Clegg enough rope to hang themselves.

    Like

  37. 73
    Hucklebury Hound says:

    Thanks to the Press with that mugshot of Pryce in prison the people of this country can make their own inferences about prison life in the UK .

    Like

  38. 75
    anon y mouse says:

    It takes a long time for the public to wonder why the rest of the world know what’s happening in the country and when they don’t, then things will happen, besides if they can’t uphold the laws we have in place how the hell are they going to make these laws work, laws are only for the people who obey the law, they are typical lawyers laws each one has a thousand ways around them.

    Like

  39. 78
    Blowing Whistles says:

    The Wording of Article 19 UNDHR (1948) was “specific” and “well defined”.

    This Charter is a labryinth of double-speak and legal rhetoric. Smoke and Mirrors not fit for purpose in the 21st century.

    Like

  40. 83
    We love Lord Lucas says:

    Thank God there’s one lover of democracy in UK.

    Well done, Lord L, and thank you! x x x

    Like

  41. 89
    Guido's Uncle Rupert says:

    So what about “independent” bloggers funded by enormous right-wing media empires ?
    Eh, Guido ?

    Like

  42. 90
    Red Ed says:

    We wont care, you’ll all be nationalised under the BBC British Bloggers’ Corporation, paid for by a PC licence fee, all the money going to pay for Owen Jones to blog about the sacred right to sit on your arse, watch TV, eat and drink what you like, breed night and day, and demand a bigger slice of the pie!

    Like

  43. 97
    Osborne's Sixth Sense says:

    “I see debt people”

    Like

  44. 98

    And there at the last minute, our noble Lord Lucas, in a shining suit of armour, ready to do battle and a cheery ‘Huck off.’

    Like

  45. 99
    Anonymous says:

    Good luck trying to get Global and General Nominees Ltd shut down. It’s based in Nevis. I think you need to put a physical deposit down to begin any legal action against any company in Nevis….and it this company is owned by a trust or foundation, double fucked.

    Like


Media Reader

The Piers Morgan Connection to Hacking | Indy
BBC Marr Pinko Trying to Ban the Queen | Speccie
Eric Hobsbawm: Companion of Dishonour | Standpoint
Russell Brand Comes Out as 9/11 Truther | Guardian
10 Years of Guido | Iain Dale
Tory MP Tells Leftie Jon Snow to Retire | Guardian
Guido Whips Politicians Into Shape | Guardian
Mrs Danczuk Beats Mensch to Win Guido | Telegaph
PM Congratulates Blogger Who Destroyed Minister | Mail
Revealed: Guido Fawkes Anniversary Dinner Guestlist | Peter Oborne
Give Journalists Public Interest Defence in Law | Guardian


VOTER-RECALL
Find out more about PLMR


Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann on Cameron’s refusal to pay the £1.7 billion EU bill by December 1st:

“Well, then he’s gonna pay on December 2nd”



Mycroft says:

Have you read the last bit of Animal Farm?

You know where the animals are looking through the Farmhouse window?

My TV screen was that window at lunch-time today.

Be careful, the sudden self-congratulatory tone, the slightly pudgy outline of indulgence and you become exactly what you should despise.

The jolly face of the Quisling Cameron poses for your camera has mesmerised and deceived you, you who were once not so deceived.

You were no firebrand, you were a damp squib in my opinion, sorry.

You need a damned good kick up the ahse!


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,545 other followers