PMQs LIVE: Self-Appointed Detectives Edition
Comments in the comments please…
If Dave Were President He’d Have Resigned By Now | Alex Wickham
Loongate: What Happened in the Blue Boar Bar | Simon Walters
Lib Dems Should Support EU Referendum | LibDemVoice
Feldman’s Denial | Fraser Nelson
Obama’s Presidency is Imploding | Nile Gardiner
Miliband Could Be a Great PM | Thomas Pascoe
What Are You Really Paying in Income Tax? | TPA
Galloway’s Mad Month | The Commentator
Murdoch: Facebook is the New MySpace | Telegraph
Clegg’s Manifesto Referendum Pledge Spin Unravels | ConHome
Coalition Here to Stay | Ben Brogan
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tom Harris bemoans the public’s attitude to politicians…
“Mr Oborne echoes the lazy, anti-politics whine we hear so often these days, all based on the absurd notion that politicians were once loved and only fell out of public favour during the expenses scandal. He should take a walk to the Strangers’ Bar. But not to sup with the patrons he seems to despise so much, dearie me, no; he should instead look at the paintings on the corridor outside the bar, which depict the devastating fire which consumed most of the Palace in 1834. And he should reflect on the fact that on that dramatic night, as the Commons went up in flames, a crowd gathered on the South Bank to clap and cheer.”
Focus group time. says:
The thing that Dave needs to work out is which group is more likely to vote Conservative. Mad swivel-eyed loons or mad homosexuals wishing to get married.
Balls turn to wear the purple tie
Nice spot, but who here knows what the colour purple signals to those watching these puppets? No, I dont mean you plebs, when I say those watching.
Have I got news for you
While waiting for PMQS
Here is another financial disaster in the making
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-27/wall-street-junk-kings-selling-debt-poised-to-lose-
Originating from the same bank gansters of New York and London
Hows that going? Funny once, not every week
Get on with it Miliband you imbecile!
Has Ed Bolocks had a forehead transplant, it looks bigger each week
He’s got a retarding hairline.
Looks like that churchill insurance dog, head always shaking or is that for mrs inept?
Or is he becoming/monging “Lurch” from the Adams Family?
Big Fail from Ed.
He got owned.
Ed’s joke writer is Justin Moorhouse – not very funny
Who is the schoolgirl sat behind Harriet?
New Statesman classic quote by Ed!!!
He’s lost the New Statesman now…
So quoting the New Statesman is scraping the Barrel?
how bad is Ed Sillyband, the man cannot string together a coherent sentence
joolz
What is harriet wearing around her neck
Not a noose so I don’t care
Better one of Winnie’s flaming tyres.
It was like a thought bubble popped out of Ed’s head.
“Did I really say quoting the New Statesman was scraping the barrel?
Ahhhh… that delicious moment when you see his face registering what his mouth has just said….priceless
Thompson Twins – We are Detectives
Wow, wasn’t I useless again.
Another run on the food banks.
And how many that use the food banks don’t really need to?
WTF Hazel?
Hard pressed Salford families facing higher energy bills. Hazel needs to ask her leader about his role in pushing up energy bills.
The simpleton could not join the dots, just as her fellow Labour member was whinging about not making the economy carbon free by 2030. With idiots like these, who do not understand that for every action there is a consequence, we are eternally f**ked.
Arch @ 42 “for every action there is a consequence”
Plus the everpresent Law of Unintended Consequences.
Hazel blears is so dog rough she’ll soon be in Coronation Street
She did, didn`t she? She certainly held the cheque aloft and, turkey style, thrust her scrawny neck forward in a headbanger manner and one assumes it was paid.
You can’t send payments to HMRC unless they have issued a demand for payment.
It was a stunt designed to make her look “good” & the viewers believe she was really going to put in the post.
THE POISON DWARF SPEAKS!
Why did she fancy Carina herself?
I don’t know. Why did she?
This is pedantic but she’s a Times reporter so … Vicky Pryce didn’t “tell the jury” anything. She gave evidence in court. Defendants do not address the jury.
Come Chris, come to daddy. We are all awating expectantly for you.
Should I be taking notes Mr Daddy?
Charlotte Leslie hitting at Labour’s toxic Health Care record.
Cameron playing a straight bat, but not taking the hint. He is a turd.
Andy Burnham looked puzzled. He really is in denial over Stafford Hospital.
Resign Burnham.
Well said.
Somebody’s garden gnome is missing and is currently masquerading as a Liebore MP. LOL
And drop the Maybeline ffs, you`re not the Rhondda MP.
Please remember not to unseat Ed Milliband!
We are still the policy free party.
Skinners itching to ask a question, bets on last question going to him ?
Probably “May I go to the loo”
Labour have reverted to finding individual cases. I suppose that happens when they have no policies.
Labour are liars.
What have I just said, the truth slipped out, crikey.
Careful, I don’t want too much competition on the lying front. I am numero uno mentiroso por favor.
Well say you`re sorry then, so sorry etc and mean it.
Harman old hag wearing kinky boots, just sooooo wrong.
She borrowed them from Jack Dromey.
“London Lady” by the Stranglers comes to mind. LOL
Party’s over London Lady!
Tellytax,,
Edinburgh on Friday night?
I saw them back in the 80s at the Apollo Manchester.
‘Not only Socialists but incompetent Socialists at that’.
Bit like yourself then Dave.
Chris Bryant unable to make the Sarah Palin comment heard! His mate the speaker made sure it was heard! Disgracefully partisan!
did anyone notice how many, if any, of the female lib dem members were present?
some were having new chastity keys cut.
“We will look at any individual case” Bed room tax.
STABILITY STABILITY STABILITY.
The word Cameron does not understand. Everyone that has their life changed by these step change decisions will have a family and friends. Everyone will see the injustice of these issues. It reflects on his future.
There are two types of policy: Change everyone/change all new situations. The former is appropriate to small percentage changes and the later to step changes.
The obvious way is to always introduce a step change policy in new situations only. Any change would trigger the new restriction.
If the problem is a major increase in housing benefit, it either means the rents have increased significantly or the numbers have gone up. The first implies that these people are being attacked for something outside their control. Have the actual rents for these specific long term residents gone up, or is it only the new agreed rents? Why punish the wrong ones. However, if the number have significantly gone up, then there must be a significant turnover in the system. So changing the rules for new situations only, would be adequate.
My experience is there is a turnover. I also think the costs of refurbishing these long term rentals to the new standards will further increase the rents. Look at the rule changes on renting to see why the benefits have been rising for new housing situations.
Bit of rampant inflation for a year or two and the housing market will be sorted pal.
Cant understand what all the fuss is about myself .
Aaaaah bless and more to come
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2285177/How-30-000-Romanians-arrested-UK-violence-sex-crimes-just-years.html
There is no such thing as nationalities anymore. We are now all part of one big equal happy family.
DD talking some economic sense with Brillo on Daily Politics today.
Cameron actually managed to say today his Government puts disabled people first .
What a stupid thing to say and do .
If you want to help the disabled then you first of all have to get the abled bodied people in productive work in an expanding economy .
Only if you sort this will you be able to help the disabled.
You cannot go on indefinitely giving them money no one earns.
How he got a first from Oxford is really one of life’s great mysteries.
Cameron is obviously following my posts because he has changed his mind since lunchtime.
He says now the period of fiscal consolidation is being extended which is more or less what President Hollande was saying in French . His excuse though is that he is a Socialist.
The point here in the UK is that even Mr Cameron’s altered position will have no beneficial effect whatsoever : all Mr Cameron is going to do is extend the period of sluggishness in the economy.
He would have been a better off just quoting an article in the New Statesman no one has ever read.
That is what I think anyway.