Rumour Tory MP Will “Out” Himself
Guido has heard a rumour that an in the closet Tory MP plans to “out” himself as gay in a speech during the gay marriage debate today. It would be a very emotional moment…
Lib Dems Should Support EU Referendum | LibDemVoice
Feldman’s Denial | Fraser Nelson
Obama’s Presidency is Imploding | Nile Gardiner
Miliband Could Be a Great PM | Thomas Pascoe
What Are You Really Paying in Income Tax? | TPA
Galloway’s Mad Month | The Commentator
Murdoch: Facebook is the New MySpace | Telegraph
Clegg’s Manifesto Referendum Pledge Spin Unravels | ConHome
Coalition Here to Stay | Ben Brogan
Tories Plan Coalition Divorce | Times
Public Doesn’t Back Dave on Europe | Peter Kellner
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tom Harris bemoans the public’s attitude to politicians…
“Mr Oborne echoes the lazy, anti-politics whine we hear so often these days, all based on the absurd notion that politicians were once loved and only fell out of public favour during the expenses scandal. He should take a walk to the Strangers’ Bar. But not to sup with the patrons he seems to despise so much, dearie me, no; he should instead look at the paintings on the corridor outside the bar, which depict the devastating fire which consumed most of the Palace in 1834. And he should reflect on the fact that on that dramatic night, as the Commons went up in flames, a crowd gathered on the South Bank to clap and cheer.”
Focus group time. says:
The thing that Dave needs to work out is which group is more likely to vote Conservative. Mad swivel-eyed loons or mad homosexuals wishing to get married.
Dorset MP Gay whatever next?
Seems for some reasons gays are over represented in parliament. I don’t think there is any problem in whether anyone is gay, straight or bi as long as they are honest. What I don’t support is gay pretending to be straight or vice versa.
I’m sick of all this gay rubbish, why don’t they just shut up about it and focus on something that matters?
‘I used to be gay, but I had to stop as it made my eyes water’
There are number is other issues that hasn’t been thought through.
1) adultery laws might need to be changed.
2) how marriage consummation laws need to be changed.
3) issues around future king / queen.
Then there is European Courts of Human rights and how they will interrupt the new law.
Dear anonymous. Stuff (or worse) the ECHR
I apologise. I mistook the exit for the entrance!
hallelujah! It’s not like they’ve fixed the economy or education or the NHS is it?
Gays didn’t make gay marriage an issue. Its Cameron (I think he is straight) who brought this out to deflect economic issues.
Its not even about equality as Cameron doesn’t want gay to marry in the house of God(s). Its just a con trick by Cameron.
‘Butch’, straight?! Next you’ll be telling us the BBC’s ‘Mrs Brown Boys’ is NOT in yer face propaganda for Arse Banditry and brainwashing of the proles for Gay Marriage.
gay = queen.
lesbo = dykes.
so royalty and yikes.
oh what a world.
homo sapiens go homo.
Use your common sense. Call Me Dave is out to destroy marriage.
That is part of his instructions.
+ 45 million in the UK alone.
Wavy Dave has shot himself in the foot in believing the Eagle sisters and the BBC that this gay marriage lark has nationwide support.
He also shows he lives on Fuller’s Earth, not this one.
Some of the arguments against it from the usual suspects and some surprising critics, have substantial resonance on the implications of it toward the future moral deterioration of our country – as if it could get much lower.
The disparity between gay and hetrosexual marriage is but one of the major building block faults in the edifice.
Charles Moore and one of the (hideous, rug-biting) Eagle sisters on Toady this morning. Rug-biter given free reign, Moore was constantly questioned.
Oh sorry, I forgot, it was all in a day’s work for our impartial state broadcaster….
pay your licence fee, ya c’unt!
Will the Eagle Sisters be able to marry each other? Now that’s a thought…
Why do all the comments mentioning William Hague get deleted?
No .
The Eagle sisters cannot marry each other.
Apart from being blatantly incestuous it would contravene the Ninth ( if memory serves ) Commandment
” Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife”
For God’s sake that would be bordering on the rabidly irreligious !!
Regarding the BBC position. It was recently pointed out that the BBC’s core demographic for “Strictly Come Dancing” was homosexual men and middle aged women. This seems to stretch across most of their programming ( cooking, home decor,). Has anyone got any serious and real data on BBC staffing–do the numbers of homosexuals and aging slappers in the BBC correlate with their programming?
how right you are
Pompous moron, who cares what you think !
You sound like a quare.
You look like a quare.
you have the opinions of a quare.
Are you a quare ?
If you don’t know what they are, you don’t know which way to stand. I do not mind gays, leses or anything inbetween as long as they are not the types that are what you could call “in your face”, each to their own.
Im the same with straights. I can cope with them as long as they boast about all that digusting breeding nonsense in my presence. give me a lesbian and a turkey baster anyday.
Wonder when dave will out himself as a labour party member?
He won’t need to, it’s plain for all to see.
I thought that Call Me Dave was a Communist, like the EU .
I’d be more surprised if a Tory MP were to out himself as straight. But then again these arse douches couldn’t lie straight in bed.
I like that Michael Portillo, especially on the telly.
Other than the title what exactly does gay marriage offer that civil partnership doesn’t?
It’s similar, but with knobs on.
+1000
The chance to spoil a Christian’s day.
First they stole the word “GAY” now the word “MARRIAGE” will have it’s meaning changed. I vote that Hetrosexual Marriage should be renamed “REAL MARRIAGE”.
Why not HOLY Matrimony ?
Hey, that’s a novel idea! Might even catch on.
The more militant homosexual groups will then either want the phrase banned or want to be able to use it themselves. They always want more.
Why can’t you fuckers spell “hetErosexual”?
Why can’t you buggers stop being so anal?
To the uneducated masses, it sounds like ‘metrosexual’ – an easy mistake to make.
And now for a little song that I am sure you all know, so do sing along:
Ahem
Funny little fellow
wears his sister’s clothes
and though we’re not quite sure of it
we think he’s one of “those”.
You might get it right. It is a parody of Paul Rbeson’s ‘Mighty like a rose and goes
Pretty little feller
Everybody knows
Don’t know what to call him
But we think he’s one of those
my dad used sing that to me and he was right too
A wedding ring and Matron of Honour. Bridesmaids extra.
Don’t forget the flowers.
he should be in the closet about being a tory. much more embarrassing
+1000
Oh big fucking deal. What a grandstanding twat.
Are people going to cry ?
No, vomit hopefully.
I do hope someone shouts ‘big deal’
Take your pick. There are plenty of them.
‘Scuse me old bag but did you miss out an ‘r’ there?
They seem to be in a majority to me.
Will he then be a ‘back-door’ bencher then?
center parting knows back door.
all doors lead to the back.
must be servant quarters then.
so partying and quarters. will it bring harmony.
for some.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Good luck to him.
A closet gay Tory ? , well bugger me !
Apparently Osborne, Hague and Mrs May are trying to drum up support for this measure.
I’m here worrying about meeting the month’s payroll. Most people are infintely more worried about our dreadful financial problems than this end-of -the-pier sideshow. Osborne ought to get a grip on his own job.
+1
Well said. It is a clear measure of their terrible desperation that the Nasty Party has had to wheel out the so-called ‘big guns’ and to provide them with a JCB in place of their shovels, without having the sense to realise that the hole will get even bigger. They may win the vote today, but at the same moment they will kiss goodbye to government at the next election.
This is political incompetence on a truly industrial scale.
surely if your business is on the slide that is your fault, not the Governments. Im sick of everything being the governments fault in some peoples eyes, take responsibility for yourselves FFS.
There speaks an idiot who’s never run a business.
And pray tell us your business experience,anon. I’ve part owned mine for 25 years and, so far, have never had to make a compulsory redundancy. But with demand so subdued and consumers’ budgets so stretched, it’s been a real struggle of late. But we’re still going.As you are seemingly a business visionary, your advice would be most welcome.
Borgen says:
When is Danish Brigitte going to rape seduce Kasper just like she did her driver Kim a few episodes ago ?
We should be told !!
This gay marriage issue is an absolute storm in a teacup!
Gay and lesbian ferrets in a sack
Yet another one of PC Dave’s little mates crawling out from under the stone.
There is nothing wrong with being gay just as there’s nothing wrong with being heterosexual – the whole issue is a side show of no interest to the electorate .
It’s time they started concentrating on the big 4 issues, the economy, immigration, health and education – well Gove is doing a great job with education – pity we can’t say the same about osborne and the economy.
They can’t, those issues belong to our more important parliament across the channel.
Their job, as was their predecessors, is to destroy the British way of life, its institutions, including their own, and bankrupt us; then the other lot can take over properly.
Where to you think this has come from ? Conicidence that the French are passing the same lwas at the same time ?
Clue, from Richard North’s blog
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)5 of the Committee of Ministers [ of the European Council ] to member states on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity”- the timetable set for “full implementation” in June 2013
They can’t, those issues belong to our bosses across the way.
Their job, as was their predecessors, is to destroy our way of life, our institutions, including their own, and bankrupt us; then the other lot can take over properly.
The clue is in the title but I cant be bothered
Fcukwit Tory Twat:
Look at me everybody I’m a Gay and I want the world to know…
The World:
?
The Taliban:
Off with his balls!
Are there any that are not Bent???
I wonder what he has been promised in return for coming out.
A really good shafting……by his constituents?
If I can get to him beforehand, I’m certain I could cure him.
You are Sally Bercow well known maker of men and expensive blunders, and, I claim my £10 Westminster food voucher.
I say , Does an 18″ Strap On come under bedroom furnishings or Mp’s Dress allowance ?
i see nothing questionable about such an item
Only if you wear it on yer forehead
You seem to have an unhealthy interest in gay bedrooms, want to come out on here ?
Bet that will be handled really sensitively
In other news, that lass in the roadkill t-shirts advert, aye carumba
we look forward to one of them (any party) ‘outing’ themselves as competent and/or honest
‘gay outing’ looks as much a disingenuous diversion as ‘wrapping oneself in the flag’ or ‘i did it for the children’
Can somebody explain how consummation and thus non-consummation will work with gay marriage? What will the grounds for dissolution? I am led to believe by Wikipedia that not all male homosexuals commit buggery.
If gay marriage thus has no compulsory sex element, then why not allow marriage between consenting same-sex siblings?
This is a matter of equality surely, why deny this marvellous institution to sisters or brothers?
Cameron is an idiot.
I mean to say two men living together cannot produce a sprog.
Two women living together cannot produce a sprog.
Only men together with women can produce sprogs.
In China if you are married man and woman you are only allowed to produce one sprog . If you produce more you are shot.
Simple really
That seems a very odd argument.
How many weddings get dissolved because of non-consummation?
Ones that weren’t arranged/forced?
SP4BS,
Consummation is an integral part of marriage as it currently stands in law and most religions. Therefore a change in the law means a change in the definition of existing and future heterosexual marriages.
Just been watching two kweers on Sky International (Boulton & Co) defending their pro-gay marriage stance. They have been “married” for over 20 years and have 5 kids.
I am wondering why nobody asked them where they got the kids from – or whether either of them had ever had a job and done a proper day’s work in their entire lives.
Someone is going to shoot themselves in the foot, I hear you say .
Cameron must take action now .
Sent William Hague to Mali quickly .
Order Order. This is the Mother Of Parliaments, not the front page of The Sun.
A hundred and forty of my own MP’s will vote against me , how very dare they ? i’ve bent over backwards to accommodate them , and now they launch this rear guard action
I want to marry my daughter.
Please fix it for me Mr Cameron.
It wont be long before some people want to marry their pets AND mps will say it’s normal & will pass a bill to accommodate these deviants, and just wait until the court of human rights start to put their oar in!
Nothing is sacred anymore!
Do they also have an Ore to spare perhaps?
Bet many MPs would love to lower the age of consent if they could get away with it.
Just the one?
Let the mincers get married , more Totty for us real men
Gerrrrrrr
Legalise incest now .
I want to marry my cousin .
I should have the right to do so .
Cameron’s Bill clearly does not go far enough.
I think I love my dog .
If this is the best open debate the Tories can give us it is a pretty poor show talking about tax subsidies for traditional marriage .
Become a a muslim, laws don’t apply then.
Shut it or we’ll cut your fucking hands off
If you are allowed to marry your dog then we think you should also get an additional tax allowance.
Royalty do so already
As do many of the liblabcon’s imported vibrants.
Hey, you sound like royalty!
The tory party is full of reasons why you can’t marry your sister!
Fitting punishment for Huhne.
Crucify him on a windmill.
Vicky’s up.
After lurking in closets all that time
Getting to come out has to be sublime
Hope he’s checked his trusses and trendy smalls
For any trace remaining of mothballs
Because skidmarks in his knicks
might put off all potential pricks?
Seems homosexuals think it more important to out themselves, instead of the more important thing of getting on with the job they put themselves up for, representing their constituents, get on with the job, pick your handbags in your own time.
I hope that we get our money back if the rumour turns out to be false.
It’s meeeeeeee!
I am becoming increasingly weary of the gay agenda, when in the history of a nation have 0.1% of the population have had so much influence on the political agenda.
I bet the 2.5m people who do not have a job think this is really important.
Helen Grant was on Sky this morning supporting gay marriage, remember her she is the MP with a constituency in Kent but because she is so important she needs a flat in central London and claims, to the penny, the maximum expenses.
Cameron is finished as a politician and had no chance of winning the next election
* UKIP are trending at ~ 14%
* Gay marriage will cost him 3-5% of the core Tory vote
* He has not resolved the abuse of the postal voting system
* He has not got his boundary changes
* He has done nothing about immigration
* He has not got public spending under control
* He has not got rid of pilgrims who are actively opposing coalition policies at the tax payers expense
* He didn’t get rid of the trade union modernisation fund
* He has not reduced the burden of red tape on industry
The list of broken promises is almost endless
This man is a political loser
But he has simplified the tax system .
As if the 2.5 m without a job actually want one !
Difficult to disagree.
We need a real leader to come forward. Looking at the likely lads and lassies only David Davies still looks in shape; though I doubt if he is interested after being totally sidelined by the party and with few obvious friends in parliament.
Hope I am wrong.
That Phil Hammond is a bit of a bean counter but at least he doesn’t rock the boat.
This. 110%.
I don’t give a flying intercourse about gay marriage. They can get married in satanist costumes in the middle of an England international at Wembley as far as I care.
What I care about is the fact that this government has still not fixed the economy, the corruption of MPs, the bias of the BBC, the benefit culture, the immigration issue & the EU debate.
While this government is still not as bad as what would have happened if Labour had got back in all they have done is tread water. What we need in this country is a government with some backbone who have the strength to make unpopular decisions that will be better for the nation in the long term. Not yet another group of yes men who look no further than a bunch of focus groups and their own future directorships.
Well said.
Possibly the best post written in history of the interweb…. Ok maybe not, but up there.
As mentioned by others here, the “Gayification” of TV has been plain to see since oh maybe the late 90′s (whenwas arsebanditery legalised?)
Bearing in mind the % of the population it is relevant to,
“The wheels that squeeks… Gets the OIL”
(or money,publicity,LAWS)
May i suggest that by default post 1 on any topic is that quote, it’ll be right more often than it’s wrong.
Agree with most of that.
I personally don’t care about gay marriage but I care very much about polticians exceeding their over-generous priviliges.
The proposed change is to a basic aspect of society and as such demands approval from the public to whom it relates.
Without mandate Cameron is abusing the office of PM. Sadly, he is so far up his own rear that he is oblivious to public concern.
Prospect of a labour government containing so many criminals from the last government scares me but the prospect of the current ‘conservative’ outfit scares me even more.
Will any MPs get up and admit they have been happily married to a person of the opposite sex for years?
I feel sorry for that nice Samantha Cameron.
What about that closet gay Labour MP ? Will he “out” himself or will he be absent as usual?
He that tried to claim £10K for a B&O.
So when Dave was at Eton, was he anyones fag?
…and do they still have fags
“I’m Spartacus!”
We on the “right”,are falling into the “lefty’s” trap…All this publicity about homosexuals,and the B and B incident,has not endeared me to the homosexual
“community”, in fact,quite the opposite..Whereas before i was totally accepting
of homosexuals,i now have reservations about how much their lifestyle influences and affects young minds,and creates more confusion in society..
While i firmly believe in “Each to their own according to their needs”, i do not
want it rammed down my throat and in my face..I am a fairly liberal minded type,but this homosexual push has changed my perception of the homosexual community…
Completely agree. Since homosexuality became a profession, as did being blick etc, i find my tolerence levels for these people has declined markedly. Maybe thats the plan, whom the god’s wish to destroy and all that.
a profession???? what, like sheep shagging is in wales?
“i do not want it rammed down my throat and in my face..” That’s the way I like it.
Never mind, you’ll soon come to accept it. Well you will if that Fake Charity called Stonewall have their way. You know, that Fake Charity that lobbies and campaigns and promotes homosexuality as a way of life ( including I believe, the production of educational material for our schoolchildren ). And guess who subsidises Stonewall ? Go on, have a guess. Yep, you got it….it’s you, the taxpayer, whether you like it or not.
Now, I wonder what the Government will be pushing through Parliament next as a result of lobbying and campaigning by the other 27000 Fake Charities. Could be 20mph speed limits, or restrictions on alcohol or maybe restrictions on tobacco ? All being pushed by Fake Charities that you pay for. Oh, and you also pay for their CEOs on £60 k or more.
It’s a wonderful world, isn’t it ?
Promoting homosexuality as a way of life is like promoting being tall or having size ten feet. You can’t adopt something you weren’t born with. It’s actually about helping young and very vulnerable people come to terms with who they are. We adults can cope with all this insane negativity and the complete inability of some straight people to realise that we were born this way (because they don’t ask us). But young gay people have very low self esteem and are more prone to self harm, substance abuse and suicide. This occurs because of the negative comments that come from adults, who by default indoctrinate their own kids, who then bully the gay kids (or those who are perceived to be gay). I know this is true because I have experienced it for myself. So be wary who you condemn. You may just be pushing some vulnerable adolescent over the edge.
You may be correct,but tolerance and acceptance of “Gay” has come a long
way,but re defining marriage is simply a step too far for many people,just
to accomodate the wishes of a small group….I am not anti gay,nor am i a church goer,but it feels a step too far…
God forbid that we should dare to want to be treated equally under the law. What an outrageous and outlandish request.
Please let it be William Hague.
Sorry but — You’re sick.
Whatever your opinion in homosexuality you are clearly mocking this
Personally I do not give a flying f***
Gay or not Willam, Hague is still a goof Foreign Minister. Hope his wife isnt too shocked/
Yeah, a really goof foreign minister
My Willy would never coerce me by nipping off with a Lezzer.
Why would she be
What you guys don’t realise is that, for his next trick, Big Dave C is going to make homosexuality compulsory.
That would be a bummer.
I won’t take that kneeling down
It could be anyone.
Not another fucking poof telling us what to do!
I am sick of this if they want an “Alternative ” life style fine but let me live one also and stop bothering me.
Well if you don’t like same-sex marriage, just don’t get married to someone of the same sex
For fuck’s sake – the economy is in the toilet,”skools and hospitaws” are still the worst in the world despite Bruin’s doubling their cost, our defences rae at the weakest for 200hundred years, our laws are drafted by multinational lobyists in Brussels and you want to talk about the (US) culture wars of gay versus straight?
In the 19th century and early 20ht century no one discussed race or sexual orientation or all the other manufactured outrages because it was none of the State’s business, ditto passports, firearms and drugs control. Now that 60% of the population is employed by the State it has to poke its nose in everywhere. The result? misery and decline.
In the middle ages being homosexual carried the death penalty; in Victorian times it was punishable by imprisonment; a recent Labour government legalised it and rumour has it that the next one will make it compulsory! Seems that a lot of politicians are “closet homosexuals”
Anyone seen my red hot poker?
homosexuals are more noble than heterosexuals
- BBC
Will there be violins and rose petals from ceiling when the news breaks?
It’s Dave, isn’t it?
Has to be Peter Lilley.
Now there’s an old 80s student union rumour still doing the rounds. Whoever it is, so what?
Bernard Jenkin. Looks like a queer, talks like a queer, walks like a queer – probably a queer!
Would it not be a good idea for all these “oddities” to fuck off and form their own political party? No access to the usual lot. Then they could all stand for parliament on the Pooofs ticket and bugger off from the traditional parties. Then we could really see just how much support they actually had in the country.
As a by-product, we would then see the back of all these people interfering with our lives.
Excellent post
That’s be you gone then for a start
How in heaven’s name is it that there are so many poofters in parliament. In my very long life I can say that the number of gays I have actually met I can count on two fingers. Yet there are scores of them able to write MP behind their name.
How come ? They seem to be in a bigger proportion in politics than in the acting or hairdressing profession. How the hell as this come about.
some think all gay people act like john inman and wear frocks, so therefore ones that don’t are just invisible and there are probably more quiet ones actually
How do gay people act ?
Please do tell us .