Lord McAlpine Posts a Giant Turd to Sally for Christmas
How Mervyn King Lost Bank Battle War | WSJ
BBC Corporation Tax Horror Story | IEA
Sally Bercow Judgement in Full | Mr Justice Tugendhat
Commies Blame Capitalism For Terror Attack | The Commentator
Lord Black v Press Regulation | Guardian
Osborne’s Complacency | FT
DWP’s Welfare Failings | Isabel Hardman
Get Used to Coalitions | David Aaronovitch
Woolwich a Showcase in the Banality of Evil | Fraser Nelson
The Enemy Within | Max Hastings
Muslim Led Military-Style Free School Needed | Toby Young
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ed Balls stretches credulity by claiming he isn’t ambitious…
“I would love to be part of Ed’s Labour government but what I do next for me is not an all-consuming passion. I’m more bothered, in a personal sense, about getting to grade 8 piano by the time I’m 50.”
Bill Quango MP says:
Ned Flanders – Clegg
Lisa Simpson – Natalie Bennett
Milhouse – Hilary Benn
Martin Prince – Andy Burnham
Edna Krabappel – Luciana Berger
Crazy Cat Lady – Glenda jackson
Comic book guy – John Prescott
Carl – Chucka
Lenny – Philip Hammond
Willie – Eric joyce
Poochie – Gordon Brown
Reverend Lovejoy – Tony Blair
mmm
I suppose it’ll make a change from the small turd that she’s married to.
Ha, haaa….Mr Big Jobbie…we meet again.
Please. please, please can I have one Santa?
Tony Blair: immigration has been good for Britain
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/9753553/Tony-Blair-immigration-has-been-good-for-Britain.html#disqus_thread
Top few comments…
“What he means is “immigration has been great for large companies and has depressed wages for everyone else”.
It’s no coincidence he’s paid several million pounds a year by a large investment bank.”
“And difficult to see how 370,000 immigrants in receipt of benefits is contributing to this country”
“Why is he allowed to comment as a free man when he is responsible for an untold number of deaths?
The man is a traitor and a warmonger besides being a deluded fool, would imprisonment cure him? It has to be the noose, it simply has to be.”
“What a contemptible grub Blair is. The debate is not about the benefits of immigration. The debate is about an orgy of uncontrolled, mass immigration which has put intolerable pressures on jobs, infrastructure and societal cohesiveness. The debate is about immigrants who come to the UK and make no NET contribution because they immediately start sucking on the public tit”
“rubbish a deliberate ploy by Labour to get labour votes and dilute the indigenous culture.”
Still ‘rubbing our noses in it’.
The odious fucking creep.
Boo!
Oiiii. We’re doing turd jokes, so just STFU.
Look at his track record, one conclusion can be drawn from his actions, like any good Communist, he was trying to destroy Britain as we know it, history will judge him as one of this Countries Worst Disasters.
Beware Labours ulterior motive.
Well done Tone. Boaz.
There’s a far worse and far more frightening possibility: he actually thought he was doing the right thing.
Actually, there’s an even worse reading than that: Blair looks at this country now and thinks it has changed for the better since 1997.
Those possibilities frighten me far more than the simple idea that he acted malevolently to destroy the country.
That could be the case, but it is no excuse.
He needs to be brought to account for his actions. To quote one of the Telegraph comments:
‘The man is a traitor and a warmonger besides being a deluded fool, would imprisonment cure him? It has to be the noose, it simply has to be.’
The country has changed for the better since the Curry fucking Major was ousted. The trains run on time almost as well as in Mussolinis day!
In 1997 no man had a better mandate from the British people to do something profound for the country. Blair completely blew it.
The calculations fo the benefits never take account of the masses of money that is sent abroad in remittances: money which, if earned by british people, would have been retained and spent in this country (give or take the odd holiday) and thereby boosted the economy due to the multiplier effect.
OH Dear.
Excellent piece. In total agreement with you sir.
On the ‘ead son
Yuletide log.
So there will now be 3 turds in the Bercow household.
Vince’s Cable.
I said “Show me emotion” !
curlywurly Sal?
You deserve a pat on the back.
Bloody disgusting
Why oh why does the word Jurd appear to be filtered for moderation (when not bypassed by those wot know better) Guido, given that’s the topic of this thread?
What happened to the first two?
http://www.economist.com/news/letters/21567866-virtual-war-ukip-canada-commonwealth-tobacco-smuggling-twinkies-france
Top letter…
SIR – Well done: a kick in the pants is often a good motivator, though I have no illusions after living here for 25 years that much will change. Asking a socialist to embrace austerity and labour-market reforms is like asking a prostitute to embrace chastity: it’s simply not part of the business model.
Theo Vermaelen
Fontainebleau, France
If it is unacceptable that those on Benefits should be receiving more than the Average Wage (and it is)…. then it is also unacceptable that Public Servants (eg: Local Government Chief Executives) should receive more than the average wage in Pension. Those on £200,000 pa can very well afford their own Private Pension – and they can all do so because it is ‘tax-efficient’. This is a scandal which must be tackled by George Osborne at the earliest opportunity (eg: NOW).
It’s the predatory benefit class systems preying on the producers of the working class .
A policy know as “slave Labour”
What’s he trying to say?
‘My back passage is available…’
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/40413
Sign the petition at the above link about MP’s pensions if you agree.
the apostrophe should follow the s . . . S’ign. OK?
Bad idea.
MPs will then have an incentive to boost extortion funded pensions to even less affordable levels.
I would not piss on an MP if they were on fire in the gutter!
If it is unacceptable that those on Benefits should be receiving more than the Average Wage (and it is)…. then it is also unacceptable that Public Servants (eg: Local Government Chief Executives) should receive more than the average wage in Pension. Those on £200,000 pa can very well afford their own Private Pension – and they can all do so because it is ‘tax-efficient’. This is a scandal which must be tackled by George Osborne at the earliest opportunity (eg: NOW).
Q: Which King George was a nutter?
A: The turd.
Billy Bowden is first
HA.
not funny
Is that Derek as in Hattonpool or Derek as in Dumbo?
what’s the point!
Bad taste – not funny!
Sally smells like she doesn’t wipe properly. You have to wrap your index finger in toilet paper, cover it in a wet wipe and insert and thrust. Repeat until clean.
See 18!
What. The fuck. Is that.
Inspired by Her Maj, I have to again say how dreadfully grateful I am to the punters for my lovely bath plug, given me so long ago, but still providing wonderful service and many lovely memories each time I feel its rippling gripping smoothness that always pulls and pushes me towards the ultimate bathing experience.
I am delighted to learn that your bath is still being plugged on a regular basis
She’d think it was a giant Walnut Whip!
Liqueurs darling?
Fuck off – Lick yer own
I thought that WAS Sally TALKING to Lord WHATZINEHME
I thought it was hubby after he’d overdone the spray tan. *disgusted face*
That’s my Christmas Dinner!
Arf! Or should that be barf?
Where would the cultural world be without me?
One firstly has to consider the turd, then it’s history…
How did he fit into the envelope?
I hope he didn’t send it with Yodel – it most certainly would have arrived damaged and misshapened.
Yodel are by far the worst delivery company.
gordon always delivers his by hand
As a labour supporter i find this rather offensive. Please remove it!
As a Labour supporter, you are offensive. please remove yourself.
But you got to think here, “labour supporter” *smiley face sally* does sound rather like an overworked sweaty maternity truss of some sort….but what alien life-form is Labour going to give birth to? *horrified face just like slotgobs*
Is that a coffee table and turd?
This was my finest hour.
I can’t say what I posted to Giddy Gosbourne for Christmas……..
And I thought that the squeaker was only a little shit
it’s not steaming
Mine steams.!
You guys get me angry man.
That nor funny, at all.
Dear Sally
I was sitting today when suddenly something reminded me of you and your dear husband…….
3rd word typo?
Considering she’s a nobody, she seems to have become a famous nobody, nothing like a bit of PR.
And still the instigator, Tom Watson, hides behind parliament. Watson has been very quiet of late, what’s the matter fatty, lost your vile hypocritical tongue?
Yep! With today’s Media his sort always get away with it. They start the Game rolling and the presses printing. It will mean honest reporting without them and that is just plain Boring.
Tom Watson is one the desk in the pic.
sorry, I mean he is the number two on the desk.
Assuming it’s not a Photoshop montage, I’m intrigued to know what the hell it actually is?
A bronze statuette of a conga eel?
Bronze Koi Carp, probably japanese.
I think it might be a sculpture by Tony Cragg. There are several of these in the Exhibition Road in South Kensington, all of them remarkably tuгdesque. Here is one:
http://tinyurl.com/c9q3ya6
The old expression I didn’t know they could pile shit that high, normally used against those one disapproves of, takes on a new dimension.
Yes I too looked on wikipedia at who mcalpine bought sculptures from, I couldn’t be bothered to look at them though.
Who would actually pay good money for that crap?
An inflatable Xmas tree.
I thought she married a small turd?
Looks like Gordon’s been in McA’s office again. Naughty Gordon!
That’s growth of more than 10%
I achieved it with concentration , hard work, and weetabix.
Sorry Alistair – I took a wrong turning on the way to the lavvy.
Which one is the turd?
Sally takes her own Midget for throwing at Party Games.
Blair is the worst thing that ever set foot on this earth, he lied over the Iraq war and ultimately responsible for thousand of deaths of innocent people. Blair intentionally set out to change the demographics of this country alongside Brown and Mandelson, they set the ball rolling for the genocide of the British people which in itself is a crime and they should face the jury of all these crimes. How anyone could ever vote for the treacherous Labour Party is simply beyond me and unfortunately David Cameron is helping them as he is a socialist. We urgently need some of the decent members of the Conservative Party to reject Cameron and set up to run our Country properly, joining Ukip if necessary. You responsible Conservatives,’ This Country Needs You ‘ !!
Hear Hear Hear!
We urgently need some of the decent members of the Conservative Party ……….
Yes, but how can we tell who they are?
But he did attended the baptism of Murdoch’s children at the River Jordan garbed in white robes…
Somebody must have a picture?
Very well said TFD. Best comment/observation for ages.
BLiar & his cronies should be tried for tre*son.
700 hundred comments so far on Blair never read so much vile being spewed at the wanker in the telegraph ist class bastard.
That’s hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian casualties: Men, women and children.
Never forget that DU is the gift that keeps on given, as far as birth defects and killing the subsequent generations in concerned.
They may as well bury him under that public convenience he was allegedly caught cottaging in when he eventually off’s it. Will save a lot of cleaning up for the grounds staff.
Which public convenience though ?
He was caught twice.
Once in London when he was a young barrister, and much later in John Smith’s time in Edinburgh.
John Smith as leader of the labour party was desperate to keep him in the fold so he had a ‘D’ Notice put on the second one.
.. and was promptly bumped off??? There remain unanswered questions/suspicions about Mr Smith’s early demise.
As in Gaitskell to Wilson (Russian Agent), Smith to Blair (New World Order, Bilderberg etc).
Quite obvious, really.
Silly Sally should apologise and pay damages. It will cost her even more if she doesn’t. She is obviously banking on the publicity she will get if it goes to court.
Read The Slog, Mr T u r d,
Learned Counsel reckon McA would be laughed out of court if Sally takes him on, which she seems to want to do.
His lawyers are using bully-boy tactics on a case that has zero merit. McA could end up paying her costs.
Here’s a taster:
McALPINE LIBEL DEMANDS: Legal watchdog rules show Peer and lawyer on dodgy ground.
The lawyers’ watchdog the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) takes a very dim view of certain practices when it comes to suing for libel. The Slog believes that anyone surveying the precedents and agreed practices involved would fairly swiftly reach the conclusion that Lord McAlpine and his legal creature RMPI are already in breach of some of them.
He should have really gone after Alan Davis. That more open and shut.
Sally has demonstrated that she is a foul airhead tweeter since she got her account back up, no doubt all of these and those previous may need to be examined in order to determine if the * innocent face * was indeed sarcastic.
She should have used * astonished face * or * surprised face * instead. ‘Innocent’ has been twisted by the PC brigade to mean guilty too much to be taken seriously.
* oops, pointed out a major problem in the UK face *
THEY’RE BOTH TURDS AND DESERVE EACH OTHER.
Whose skin is he sitting on?
The Queen was locked in the cabinet for half an hour today.
When my nan did that we had to put her into a home.
Poll
Would you shag Nadine Dorries if the opportunity presented itself?
http://poll.pollcode.com/t9gvec
No wonder Leveson wants the internet regulated.
That’s only because no-one would vote to shag him.
Would you shag Brian Leveson?
http://poll.pollcode.com/mdo9lu
Wrong.
If you can think it , someone has probably done it…
http://rule34.paheal.net/
Sexactly.
Press TV is a 24-hour English language news network owned by the state-owned media corporation Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB). Its headquarters are located in Tehran, Iran. Wiki
As background to that Seen Elsewhere item referred to above. I had never heard of them before.
Brilliant channel.
No adverts or fiX Factor
No wonder you post what you do on the unregulated internet.
Are you going to give your lunatic alter ego youtubing buddy another runout tonight?
Quite toned down for you, TaT. But still nutshittingly mental head.
I think you mistake me for someone else
They have been around for a while – Keiser has done some interesting interviews with them.
Think: RT / Al Jazeera type broadcaster: This is the area, just Iranian backed, so like a moderate muzzie Murdoch operation with a Jihad bias. This is not that dissimilar to the BBC now I come to think of it…
Bit harsh on Press TV, isn’t that?
Well – they are moderate and professional, but is honest.
I should retract fully comparison to the BBC though, a line crossed. Sorry.
Note: Jihad does not mean terrorism – I did mean above in the more common context of the daily battle to be true to the faith. But as a state broadcaster they are still a propaganda organ.
The above article is a lift of some real news, and a bunch of blog articles: Accuracy of the blogs yet to be determined, but good to see these condensed into a coherent narrative to compare against the ‘official’ story, and it is always good to question inconsistencies.
Quranic hermeneutics are dependent upon the very different schools of interpretation encountered.
“Jihad does not mean terrorism”, not but it implies it. Jihad means imposing the koran on others. terrorism is just one of the tactics used to do this.
The ‘struggle’ translation has been my experience with all muzzies from many parts of the world.
ie. Jihad is the struggle against non believers to preserve ones own faith, in particular avoiding temptation like liquor, hookers etc., and the internal struggle to deny sin, thinking about liquor, hookers etc.
The more extreme translations and interpretations are there but have been played up a bit. However – I will not question your own personal experiences with them as they are likely different to my own.
Fatwa is the puppy to avoid, and I had to qualify as I do not want a fatwa issued against my IP.
Someone analysed classic Islamic religious texts and found that 80% of the time jihad meant warfare against the infidel: for quite a while Muslims stopped pretended it meant anything else, but it looks like they’ve decided to start playing that particular game again. The Press TV article linked to, about the school shootings in America being instigated by I*ra*li death-squads to punish the US for promoting Hagel, is insane.
A giant turd to go with the miniature one she is married to. She is collecting the set!
I was caught short while doing some building work on a house, so I decided to poke my head around the door and ask, “excuse me, love, do you mind If I use your toilet?”
“Sure,” She replied, “but can you get the fuck out until I’ve finished.”
Which is which?
Dear Santa I have been a good boy
What do you call an Irishman who can swim? A Welshman.
Bejeezus, there’s marvellous! Deed to goodness, begorrah, look you.
In the context of this thread, the answer must be “a floater”. Shirley?
Hello righties. Just wondering, if one of your kids came to you one day and said they were gay, would you disown them? Kick them out? Have them killed? Or if they came to you and said they were dating a blàck person, would you react in any of those ways?
The Tory Party is riddled with gayers you fucking nutter.
You seem to be addressing yourself to the wrong audience. Try the hypocritical left. They are the ones who like to play those sort of parlour games at their Hampstead dinner parties. (Washing-up done by the lesbian filipina maid, naturally).
Wrong audience? This is the board where the daily comments consist of playground lever homophobic jokes. That is, of course, your right in free speech. My question wasn’t over your right to hate whoever you want, it was regarding how some of you would react if one of your children was gay.
Spend a few days reading on what they have to say over at the Cato institute, libertarian.org and maybe look up Boaz. Then pop back, and you will not have to ask silly questions about how we think a parent would react to the orientation or life choices of our children.
RR you’ve hit a raw nerve. Their Party legislating for gay marriage has pushed many of them right over the edge.
Many will never recover.
Gays can marry now, or at least have civil partners. Most people are pretty cool with that. What has pissed people off is the idea of legisisation imposing a particular position on unwilling religious organisations.
You have to remember that the left is sociopathic and other people’s opinions are not considered. They have a mind unable to hold that certain people might choose different things from them, and that both parties might be better off (for their own circumstances).
If any child of mine said they were thinking of using coal I’d kill them with a pair of ecological sound wooden shears. Then bury the body for compost. Then grow weed on the composting grave and smoke it in the memory of my disowned and deceased offspring.
No.
Don’t like the Poor’s myself
I am poor also born in UK from white parents and worked all my life.
Your inner-hate manifests itself by talking about those you despise.
“Have them killed?”
Like thrown off a mountain? Those are Labour voters honey.
You’re so stupid why do you think should anyone take a blind bit of notice of what you say?
You really are ignorant. You listen too to much hate propaganda spewed forth from the left towards the right.
You should get out there are meet real people; you may then realise generalisations are rather stupid.
Do you actually read the posts here, diddums?
Fuck off, turd.
Families usually deal with this kind of shite quite well; it’s only when the arse-bandits fuck off to London or Manchester because, being the fucking drama queens they are, they feel the need to over-dramatise their plight. There aren’t all that many queers anyway. The one or two I’ve known over the years are pretty fucking ordinary, really. It’s just the shouty fuckers who make an issue out of something that’s actually not all that important.
Fuck off and be a Lefty dick on the Staggers page, or knock one out over some homo porn- there’s loads of it around on the web these days.
Tonight I’m watching some of my favourite films.
The Dark Shite
The Dark Shite Rises
Eyes Wide Shit
Houseshitter
The Turd Man
Close Encounters of the Turd Kind
Faecal Attraction
And what about that Antipodean masterpiece, Cloacaldile Dunneedee?
Tonight I’m watching my favourite films.
Houseshitter
The Turd Man
Faecal Attraction
Close Encounters of the Turd Kind
A giant turd — Don’t talk about my Jonny like that!!!!
♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪
…
I’m the leader, I’m the leader, I’m the leader of the gang I am
I’m the leader, I’m the leader, Well there’s no one like the man I’m
I can take you high as a kite every single night
I can make you jump out of bed standing on my head
…
♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫
Oh how the young girls would sing and dance to this…… thank you so much, they must have so many happy memories
No No No.
You Hum it and I will sing & play it.
“Muslim leaders have demanded the same legal exemptions as the Church of England in legislation to introduce gay marriages.
The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), with more than 500 affiliated mosques, charities and schools, said it was “appalled” by “utterly discriminatory” legislation on same-sex marriage set out by the government.
The proposals would allow faith groups to conduct gay marriages but would ban the CofE and the Church in Wales from doing so”
Don’t blame them. Religious organisations should be protected from the ideological impositions of the state.
The state should f*ck off out of crap like this !!
Curiously, only the C of E enjoys that protection under the 1297 Magna Carta statutes which are still in force.
In addition to liberty of the press, protection of religious freedoms for all other than C of E would be good constitutional amendments to have incorporated into the 1689 Bill of Rights.
A smart move for all the non C of E religions in the UK right now would be to join forces in drafting a petition demanding this protection for religion.
Іt wоuld bе nісе tо sее thе Shі’іtеs shаkіng hаnds wіth thе Јеws аbоut sоmеthіng.
Which is odd really, since in 1297 the C of E was not even a twinkle in Henry VIII’s eye.
Indeed, Henry VIII was not even a twinkle in Henry VII’s eye, who himself was not even a twinkle in Edmund Tudor’s eye, who in turn was not even a twinkle in Owen Tudor’s eye. His father Maredudd ap Tudur died in 1406 so we still have over a century to regress to the Magna Carta of Edward I.
The C of E was set up by Elizabeth I. Henry VIII always regarded himself as a Catholic.
Was he not the first (self-proclaimed) Defender of the Faith (his own, since the Pope had given him the order of the boot)?
Academic, really. The main point is that the final version of Magna Carta predated the C of E by a couple of centuries.
Well, Henry’s Act of Supremacy disappeared for a while (rather like part of your name!)
Good to see you fully restored. We never know when someone will need to be hung, drawn and quartered…
Pope Leo X granted the title of Defender of the Faith to Henry VIII in 1521, after Henry had written (or ghost-written?) a religious tract, Assertio Septem Sacramentorum (‘Declaration of the Seven Sacraments’), which defended the sacrament of marriage and the supremacy of the Pope. This, of course, was nine years before the bust-up with Catherine of Aragon and consequently with the Pope. Catherine was already a Defender of the Faith in her own right.
Please excuse cack-handed mistyping of the italics off tag in the above.
Worry not, it happens to us all at some time, Tachy.
I have always wondered what Henry was thinking whilst he was writing Assertio Septem Sacramentorum. The very number of references in it to Luther meant that he would have studied the Ninety-Five Theses in great detail. I am sure that his initial response was to address them critically because he was educationally well equipped to do so and for no other reason (related say to currying favour.)
However as we know all this was to change within a decade. My interest here is the process in his mind that enabled that 180° turn to take place. Having initially written his piece he did nothing about it for a while almost as if the process of authorage had got it out of his system. But on the ground things were changing across the water and he must have been kept up to date with the rather bumpy progress taking place. Being called a pig, a dolt and a liar by Luther must have also sharpened his interest somewhat!
We can never know but was it simply expediency that turned his mind or did the thinking of Luther percolate into Henry’s considerations to the point that, when the Pope refused him a divorce, Henry was already kicking at an open door? In this intervening period, Luther married Katherine, a nun and went on to bear him six children. Such a previously unheard of act by a priest would surely have not been lost on Henry. Here was thought backed up by action, considered by many to be reckless but also clearly complimentary to each other. However, in Luther’s case the timings mitigate against the marriage being the cause of the Theses.
We can only wonder but I have always left open the possibility in my mind that Henry’s actions in turning against the Church of Rome went beyond the undoubted need he felt to produce an heir which eventually and inevitably gets debased into the man follows his cock argument.
Presumably if our host had been around at the time, he would have stood out against the sale of indulgences too.
But Muslims have no problem marrying children though
.. and if they don’t like this potential change to our laws, they can all catch the next plane to Mecca or Calcutta.
The Muslim Council of Britain wants to be banned from doing something they aren’t going to be doing anyway. Anything less will be discrimination. Surely they should also be seeking legislation banning them from drinking alcohol and eating pork?
Call Units Night Time
I thought that was a model of Prezza on the table!
So revolted by what’s going on in this country, I’m relieved my father’s no longer alive to see what’s happening.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/dec/18/ukip-candidate-abortion-for-downs-syndrome …
UKIP will be a joke until Farage sorts out the nutters
Which is a pity. Most of the parties are plagued by nutters. There are some complete dingbats in the Labour, Green and Libdem parties in my part of London. (The Tories no longer exist as an organised entity where I live).
If you look at most parliamentary candidates and think that they are the cream of the crop, it does make you wonder what some of the less blessed specimens of local parties are like. Also, politics does seem to be one of those fields of human endeavor that attracts those with personality traits you’d try to avoid in the pub.
Anyone asked the Fabian Society if they’d like him instead?
Ed Miliband making a total tit of himself once again.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/video/2012/oct/17/ed-miliband-andrew-mitchell-toast-video
Hmmm – would have been more in the keeping of the Spirit of Xmas if his Lordship had he asked sally to make a substantial contribution to a charity of his choice as reparation.
A spell in the pillory with a sign “I am a loudmouth shrew” should not be ruled out of the question either. ‘Twas how we did it in my day.
Don’t agree Nell. Sally Bercow deserves all she gets, and hopefully she will have to pay up. She is the kind of stupid person that can ruin lives. No sympathy here.
The issue of culpability surely needs to be decided first. Then is the time for his Lordship to be magnanimous and give it to charity IMO. Since he suffered real wrong here, I for one would not blame him for pocketing it. Don’t forget Sally has responded to the writ with her familiar one fingered salute.
She would reject it.
She wants a courtroom fight – she is in love with herself and wants the publicity.
Even if means financially damaging her husband who will be saddled with the costs.
It’s a perfect set-piece for her – the most cost-efficient publicity anyone can get.
One has to ask if My Noble Lord would like a placemat.
.. or a floor mat
Put it with the others.
Fingers in ears, chant LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA…
That would be an ecumenical matter
I am very surprised that Downing Street considers such behaviour exceptional. Serious, yes, but exceptional?
Can you recall any other incidence of Plod trying to fit-up a Cabinet Minister?
I remember them raiding one Mr Green’s office, wasn’t he swaged away by plod, all down to the stasi brown being paranoid about little leeks.
You’re right, but I had the feeling at the time that Plod had been dragged rather unwillingly into that one. La Smith’s fingerprints were all over it as Home Secretary at the time.
And Mr Greeen was not actually a cabinet minister
Good point. Shadow cabinet.
Probably wishful thinking that the police were unwilling participants…
Wasn’t yet another lefty Blair in charge at the time?
I wonder if Andrew Mitchell will be able to sue The Sun and others for libel now?
He should have a case, provided the publications cannot prove any allegations they printed about him.
If the police evidence is proven beyond doubt to be false, they will settle out of court. They have already probably cancelled office parties in preparation for this.
Looks like you all owe an apology to Channel 4 News, given your usual barrage against them, now that their lead story tonight has been to basically exonerate Andrew Mitchell. Your default rants are to say “headline will be about baby eating tories”.
A message from the me, chief Lefty Loser.
I for one do not like C4 news one bit, but I must take my hat off to Crick for his investigative work. Can’t wait for further developments.
Crick was, in my opinion, very fair, I got the impression that snow was less than excited over this than had it been a libore minister stiched up. He can often work himself up in a froth, all boney stabing fingers and sneers, when cross questioning a Tory.
Snow lost the argument against the NRA man on the box on monday night – BIG TIME.
Will Deadwood eat his words?
I think that the problem here is that the BBC have been ‘riding shotgun’, covering Weird Ed’s back for him over the past two years.
This has given the impression that he and Balls have had the upper hand. But remember: This episode reminds us that Labour are as incompetent in opposition are they were in Government – perhaps even more so.
They have had no policies, it’s just been attack, attack, attack. When someone actually lifts the drains to see what’s there, it all falls apart.
Time to turn the tables and expose Labour for the scum that they are.
PS: Nothing on the BBC News website front page. What a surprise!
I luuuuv my blank sheet of paper.
I love your blank sheet too, Dear Leader. I have always supported you.
I love your blank sheet too, Dear Leader. I have always, always supported you.
Mein Fuehrer.
Just posted by the BBC (eventually)
Crick turns plebgate into plodgate.
“Case against Mitchell looking flimsier tonight, footage shows no blazing row. Denunciation by off duty copper looking unreliable.”
You bet it does given that the ‘witness was never there’. The police need to get to the bottom of how the non-existent witness’ statement came to be ‘remarkably similar’ to the police log. It suggests not just wrong-doing by the ‘witness’ but by one or more officers on duty that night.
Also, the leaders of West Midlands Police Federation, who called for Mitchell to resign should consider their position as it appears they were less than truthful when they emerged from their meeting with Mitchell. If they are serving officers / Pilgrims, they should also be investigated.
We slipped them a few quid.
Let’s move on, shall we ? We don’t need any over-arching, independent, judge-led full public inquiry now. Look !!! Over there ! It’s Christmas.
Do athiests celebrate Hannukah?
We had nothing to do with it.
Maybe the guy at the head of the police federation needs to be interviewed.
Maybe he needs to be sacked
Defenestrated – from the top floor of the Shard?
“Other items for review: ceasing all free IVF treatment on the NHS; cutting unecessary waste e.g the destruction of drugs in care homes when residents move on to the next care home or the next world; the pregnancy abortion time limit; compulsory abortion when the foetus is detected as having Downs, Spina Bifida or similar syndrome which, if it is born, could render the child a burden on the state as well as on the family. CLARIFICATION TO AVOID CONFUSION AND MISREPRESENTATION: I do not, and UKIP does not, endorse any of these ideas: they are suggestions of matters for the review body to properly consider in light of the stated desire of all political parties to reduce the national debt…..
“Any organisation’s image is always improvable, and in my opinion our party’s image is much improvable. Many voters still believe we are the BNP in disguise, are extremists, madmen or dotty. Although they don’t tell me this to my face when I campaign (perhaps because I am clearly not a madman nor dotty) I sincerely believe that many are thinking it.”
[Geoffrey Clark, candidate for Nothebeeyenpee National Exec and Gravesham Council]
So many more to choose from…
http://geoffreyclark.webs.com/manifesto
p.s. Busy day for rightie nutters, honourable mention to former Arizona GOP Treasurer Mike Harris: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7jLGFkrVVs
“Other items for review: ceasing all free IVF treatment on the NHS; cutting unecessary waste e.g the destruction of drugs in care homes when residents move on to the next care home or the next world; the pregnancy abortion time limit; compulsory abortion when the foetus is detected as having Downs, Spina Bifida or similar syndrome which, if it is born, could render the child a burden on the state as well as on the family. CLARIFICATION TO AVOID CONFUSION AND MISREPRESENTATION: I do not, and UKIP does not, endorse any of these ideas: they are suggestions of matters for the review body to properly consider in light of the stated desire of all political parties to reduce the national debt…..
“Any organisation’s image is always improvable, and in my opinion our party’s image is much improvable. Many voters still believe we are the B*P in disguise, are extremists, madmen or dotty. Although they don’t tell me this to my face when I campaign (perhaps because I am clearly not a madman nor dotty) I sincerely believe that many are thinking it.”
[Geoffrey Clark, candidate for Nothebeeyenpee National Exec and Gravesham Council]
So many more to choose from…
http://geoffreyclark.webs.com/manifesto
p.s. Busy day for rightie nutters, honourable mention to former Arizona GOP Treasurer Mike Harris: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7jLGFkrVVs
This made my day! Just saw footage of the Queen’s visit to Cabinet. When she met George Osborne, she asked what had happened to the gold bars at the Bank of England. He replied that some of them had been sold, which the Channel 4 reporter rightly said was “a dig at Gordon Brown”.
You see, righties? I may say a few things about you that you don’t like, but we’re united in our hatred of Gordon Brown.
Piss off you smug little shit.
No, I won’t. I’d rather spitroast your wife.
You’d need to grow a cock to do that.
Don’t kill your gay son. He has rights too.
Will you two sockpuppets please go away back to whichever trade union funded dronatorium gave you your internships and ask your boss to stop ripping off the tax payers? Thank you.
He IS a cock.
My son is all man and shags girls like god intended.
You certainly precipitated a conversation last Friday evening, if that was also you. Good on yer, matey!
Say what you like, we have broad shoulders.
And you.
Hi Anonymong.
No. That was me.
You’re more likely to see John Prescott go on a diet than see Ed Miliband apologise for his defamatory comments about Mitchell.
Plod telling lies and making things up and falsifying evidence. Who’d have thought our police could ever do such a thing?
Who was behind this stitch-up of Andrew Mitchell? Did Labour get the police to lie?
What’s staggering is that these coppers lied about there being a massive crowd of eyewitnesses. Did they not realise CCTV footage could be checked as it now has been?
Have you spoken to a plod? They are the thickest people you can imagine, they don’t think their lies through. I notice the BBC are playing this story right down now, yet plebgate was top billing for days. Funny that.
Same as ClimateGate.
You don’t think they report anything that doesn’t fit their narrative do you?
Ed Miliband will now do an Abrahams and go into hiding, refusing to apologise.
Regarding big steaming brown things, I wouldn’t mind, but t*rd is modded on here, except when Fawkes wants to use it.
It’s an initiative test.
The Mitchell stitch-up has the stench of Labour all over it. Right about now they’ll be wanting to wring Michael Crick’s neck for uncovering the scandal.
Labour, the unions and the dead tree press who just wanted to get at Cameron over Leveson.
you need a big ringpiece to squeeze out a turd with a girth like that
O/T The DT has become a comment dump for Ukippers frustrated that buggery isn’t illegal.
I think you could push that point too far.
It must hurt
What are the odds of Mitchell returning to the cabinet as police minister…
No,no,no,no……
Why doesn’t he just ask for all of the officers involved to be summarily dismissed from their posts? Without pension rights.
What a good idea!
Then, and only then, would plod get up off their fat arses and properly investigate all the 650 MPs for tax and expenses fraud and other malfeasance(s) in public office.
Sky News still peddling Sun story as correct. How can Joey Jones think that any of the police version of events is now credible when we know that the ‘witness’ is a plod who wasn’t even there and who has the same story as the police log which is also wrong in part?
The Sun is standing by its story, really? I remember Piers Morgan standing by the faked photos of the soldiers beating up an Iraqi man, it cost Morgan his job and credibility.
Mitchell has stuck to same story yet the police seemed to be out to get him or at least their union was.
The Sun will not want to admit liability when there is a guaranteed Libel in the works shortly after new years. Sky may also be in the same situation.
They will be looking to settle out of court on this one, and print the retractions after.
Yes but to try to claim that both versions of events are of equal value still when we know one contains lies and untruths and the only ‘witness’ is from someone who pretended to be a member of the public but is in fact a serving police officer and has admitted they were not even there makes me trust the police not at all.
I agree that for the force as a whole this looks bad, and for many people the circumstances here may be all to familiar.
Always be careful when interacting with the police.
The maxim is, even if not formally under caution, anything you say may and will be used against you.
Apropos of absolutely nothing, I recall an old Rumpole Of The Bailey episode in which Rumpole was prevailed upon to defend in a defamation action rather than in one of his more usual criminal cases. The upshot was that it was a collusive suit in which each of the litigants was looking to screw the newspaper that printed the story. The editor defames some woman, she sues for a half-mill, turns out she’s his “bit on the side” and she’s tired of being reported in the paper as a nudge-nudge, wink-wink, “that sort of woman” in connection with her love life and previous boyfriends. He’s going to stick it to them because they’ve asked him to retire. They’re going to use the money to set themselves up in some small country where 500K in 1980′s money would allow them to live like royals. Not saying the Sun is looking to bung Mitchell in a roundabout way (What would they be getting for their money? Has he given them anything before, in his previous stint as the overseas development minister, or even before that?), but stranger things have happened.
Further, despite what we have seen in the video, it has not been formally proven yet that the police account of the interaction is false.
The PNB account if found false is serious: Fabrication of evidence is a very serious offence. Because there is no audio, and Mitchell’s lips are not visible, the only doubt as to the recorded exchange is cast by inconsistencies in other parts of the account. These are independent of the reported verbal exchange.
It will eventually come down to Mitchell’s word against the police officer in question, in which case the officer will generally be believed unless he admits falsifying evidence.
That issue may require a trial to resolve.
Only once the police evidence, source for the media, is proven false, can any case against the media really proceed.
In this case, unless there was direct media collusion in fabricating evidence, they were acting on what should have been unquestionably reliable source.
If Mitchell does to sue for libel it may be a very interesting case.
‘Evidence’? You seem to think that a criminal offence took place.
However, for the police to lie, even about a trivial matter such as this, is serious as it shows they are not fit to hold their public offices.
What you mean even knowing the police account talks about several members of the public as witnesses and the fact the email sent came from a serving police officer whose account is almost identical to the police log?
Plod is up to their fat red necks once again.
The email was not sent on the night in question, nor was it sent by any of the officers involved. That is not relevant to what was recorded in the PNB on the night in question. The email is very much a separate and somewhat serious issue in its own right.
Strictly speaking, unless it can be proven that the PNB record of the conversation is false it is Mitchell’s word against the police officers. Plenty of circumstantial, but it may still be difficult to convince a Judge that the verbal portion of the PNB record was fabricated, unless another witness can corroborate, or an audio recording of the interaction can be produced.
However, one way this could go in court:
The police may claim that the conversion to the point where Mitchell got off his bike took place whilst he was riding towards them. In the video, Mitchell’s back is to us, and we can only see the police who seem to be directing Mr. Mitchell towards the side gate.
For the first part of the interaction, one would expect the officer to have noted that the conversation was shouted, or yelled. Speaking and said are recorded action, which unless the police have very good hearing may cast reasonable doubt on this portion of the account.
Mr. Mitchell then gets off his bike, walks over and waits patiently looking down whilst the gate is open, then is off and away. We do not see him in front of the police officer as he exits.
The officer claims he verbally warned Mitchell that his conduct could lead to a POA arrest, after Mitchell had got off his bike. This Mitchell has not denied thus far, and he has admitted to saying: ‘You guys are supposed to f*cking help us.’ which has not apparently been recorded.
(The formal verbal warning is significant, these can remain on the record, and in some instances can show up on enhanced CRB checks. A police report was filed in this matter, which implies that this warning is currently formally recorded.)
It is not clear on the video where that warning took place. You would expect it to be very obvious, as the officer should be commanding Mitchell’s attention clearly at this time.
The big inconsistency is the shocked members of the public opposite the pedestrian gate. This is important, as if a POA prosecution had taken place, this is evidence that other members of the public have been harassed by the alleged conduct of Mr. Mitchell: A court could convict in this case with this evidence being provided by the police.
That these members of the public do not appear to be there or indeed in a shocked state according to the video evidence casts serious doubt on this aspect of the recorded events.
That this appears to be fabricated is somewhat serious.
THE PIGS USE ‘STILL PICS’ TO CONVICT DRIVERS …. every day.
The Evidence is now in the Public Domain – and therefore it is a “Public Controversy” – which MUST BE RESOLVED PUBLICLY – and that’s in the legals’ BoldyArch crim bible.
“This is important, as if a POA prosecution had taken place, this is evidence that other members of the public have been harassed by the alleged conduct of Mr. Mitchell: A court could convict in this case with this evidence being provided by the police.”
Absolute rubbish. People cannot be “harassed” by a verbal altercation or argument between two third parties that has nothing to do with them. “Alarmed” maybe but even that is stretching it and simply not what this law was intended for.
The police officer verbally warning for POA was also OTT. The law was never intended to suppress arguing or remonstrating with jobsworths although that is how they try to use it.
If this is an example of your legal expertise God help us.
Truth or lies, Mitchell is still a Koont who thinks it’s OK to flush taxpayers money down third world drains. Good enough reason for him to be fucked off in my book.
Mitchell might be a twat but the police need sorting out. The endless lies are pissing me off.
Prescott and Macquarrie reports out tomorrow.
Another one is definitely needed for Mitchell.
The question I have is why would the officers concerned do this? What was thier motivation?
Career development and leadership.
Well, none of them will have a career now.
LOL
OPERATION GET MONGSHELL BACK IN CABINAT IS IN FULL SWING…LOL
“”"”he admitted that he had lost his temper and sworn at the officers”"”" NUFF SAID PLEB OR NO PLEB
It hasnt gone away….the wrong person was accused, thats all…watch and learn.
Don’t forget the BBC now have the Pollard report (finally). Here is my prediction of what will be said.
1. The BBC did nothing wrong.
2. The BBC told the truth
3. No one at the BBC put pressure on Newsnight to kill the story
4. The BBC are brilliant
5. The BBC deserve a big rise in the TV tax.
6. Newsnight is brilliant.
Oh and in a few months time don’t be surprised if Nick Pollard gets a nice consultancy job at the BBC. No one in the media EVER crosses the BBC if they expect to get work in the future.
It will be a whitewash. Oh and the BBC won’t publish the evidence so you will have to take their word for it. As we know the BBC like the police are lying twats.
They are a national treasure
.. which like all fabled treasure should be buried at the bottom of a very deep mine shaft without further delay.
Turd meets Mr Turd the Third
LET US PRAY…..
How much was left in the collection plate?
A few coppers.
Of no use, though. All bent.
A plebiscite!
A Tory stole the money, the police will all give personal statements once one has been written out and photocopied 700 times. Only a police statement is full of more lies than the Bible.
Most of these folk would rarely darken the door of a place of worship but this event is one of the places to be seen if you wish to be promoted
Oh come all ye….?
Tu*rd meets Mr Tu*rd the Third
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE…NEO NUTS CAN YOU PLEZZZZZEEE CONTINUE GOING ON ABOUT PLEBBY….YOU ARE DOING YET MORE DAMAGE..KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
I think you have picked up someone else’s prescription by mistake.
lol
I Thwant a thull pubwic inthquireere
Piss off back to Poland, Gromit.
You have to admit….he does sound like one. All that is missing is a mac.
Mongschell is an old fashion tory who we all hate. He is like Harry Enfields Tory Boy…..So please keep on harping on about the twat…The more you back him, the worse it will get for you. Thanks in advance.
Mon*gschell is an old fashion tory who we all hate. He is like Ha^rry Enfi*elds Tory Boy…..So please keep on harping on about the tw*at…The more you back him, the worse it will get for you. Thanks in advance.
It’s not about ‘backing him’ though. The bloke resigned, and he won’t be getting his job back, because somebody else is doing it now. It’s about establishing the truth – I know that’s a difficult concept for some in politics to comprehend; but there are people in the UK who are still old-fashioned enough to actually respect the truth, and find the lies, spin, smearing and bullsh*t often associated with modern politics to be rather less than acceptable.
+1
Why reply to a nutter Engineer ffs? Oops, I’ve just done it meself.
Lies, spin, smearing and bullsh*t, It’s our ‘Trust’ mission statement.
Well said Eng.
http://www.channel4.com/news/
Raising more money for the rich
Will someone rid me of this woman?
A quick search of the internet reveals that Silly Sally is a hopeless attention seeker with delusions of adequacy.
I believe in the institution of Marriage and that is why I am forcing it upon Homosexuals.
Ooohh ducky!! I LOVE it when you force me!!!!! I am bent over enough?
I say I believe in the institution of marriage but by my actions treat it with contempt
See Sally’s twitter account is under reconstruction. Again!
Surely not because of the Andrew Mitchell revelations?
Is she having treatment for her illness?
She gave up her twitter Habit earlier in the year and it looked a success but she succumbed again and it looks like John will now have to fork out 50k as a result.
+ legal costs, hopefully.
Sally will be hoping that the batteries are included.
You tell them Andrew
“David Cameron held a lengthy conversation with the former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks at a party on Saturday night in Chipping Norton, Downing Street has confirmed.”
The truth and the British Bullshitting Corporation do not belong in the same sentence.
When is this parasite organisation going to be brought to heel,this bunch of leftie supporters at any cost with their total bias are a disgrace as to what used to be an impartial broadcaster respected throughout the world.
Now we find they are taking the EUSSR shilling to further this outfits causes,what an utter disgrace.
I see that the Bollocks report is out soon,don’t hold your breath folks as to what that will try to say,mitigation is in the air.
We have already seen the blame being shuffled around in this organisation leading to resignations and obcene payoffs funded by us to Crapita the beeboids licence collectors on a bonus who have no legal powers and operate on fear.
This crowd need to be shut down and made to stand on their own two feet and then we will see how they appeal to the masses.
Envy and bad feelings will get you nowhere!
Might we suggest you come along to one of our Regional Seminars where we can show you just how important we are to the National Life and Consciousness of the UK. In fact, we’ve put your name down for a Progressive Re-Education Course leading to a Certificate Of Attendance from Common Purpose.
And on re-reading your post we find we have no option but to insist you attend! Pack a small suitcase and wait by just inside your front door – don’t attempt to leave by the back! Our boys will be round soon.
Copied to:
EUSSR Thought Police
Local Authority (Electronic Media) Monitoring Teams.
Whilst the EU is reeling from austerity, now would be a very good time to attack.
There was a very interesting item on BBC One news tonight at 6PM. They mentioned that both BBC and ITV had paid compensation to Lord McAlpine “in relation to accusations conserving child abuse concerning an unnamed Tory peer“.
Errr.. there was no “Tory peer”. This was part of the fabrication. But the BBC, even after paying compensation, still couldn’t resist the urge to try and stick the boot into the Conservatives. Lies and deceit are in the BBC’s DNA.
The BBC should be abolished. The scum who work for it should be thrown on the dole and left to rot alongside the lefty subhuman filth from the Gruadian and Independent.
There was a very interesting item on BBC One news tonight at 6PM. They mentioned that both BBC and ITV had paid compensation to Lo*rd McAlp*ine “in relation to accusations conserving chi*ld ab*use concerning an unnamed Tory peer“.
Errr.. there was no “Tory peer”. This was part of the fabrication. But the BBC, even after paying compensation, still couldn’t resist the urge to try and stick the boot into the Conservatives. Lies and deceit are in the BBC’s DNA.
The BBC should be abolished. The lefty scum who work for it should be thrown on the dole and left to rot alongside the lefty subhuman filth from the Gruadian and Independent.
How come Emily is mateless? She looks OK to me.
Not many wish to mate with a swivel eyed lizard.
Newsnight once again peddling lie that the far right are taking over Europe. Paul Mason is obsessed with this subject, it’s not doing his mental state any good.
Eat ur art out X factor
If this guy wants to carry on selling fish, let along GBP 1 fish, we need to start defending fish stocks properly in our fishing waters.
The EuroMongs are continuing their insane practice of fish genocide: This must be stopped now.
Someone please wake the government up to this important issue.
The smell of fish is something Johnny Bercow must be used to. At least this is a rather good song and not a pong.
Hi !!! and Hullo !!!!
I see from the above that you’ve already picked my super message about much improved and Progressive UK is now since I imported millions of effnics and created a Plitically Krect state wiv thousands of Diversity Officers, Compliance Officers, Effnic Outreach Officers, translation services and lots and lots of work for the Human Rights Industry and Lawyers!!!!
There’s so much more to tell you!!!!! and that’s just the tip of the iceberg!!! But I must fly, – wealthy fella wants to talk to me about an investment opportunity at midnight!!!
My boy Dave is looking after the shop for a while – ‘til we get the UK well stuffed and in the €USSR oven!!! Hahahaha!!!!!!!!!! geddit????
OK Cherry babe – coming!!!
Paul Mckeever is the chairman of the Police Federation, remember the name.
guido alarm bell
P au l Mck eever is the chairman of the Poli ce Feder ation, MY HOW HE HATES THE TORIES
The Police were totally – politicised by the labour Party by 2007 inc ACPO.
Ask former CCMartin Baker of Dorset p.olice.com – now a fee lovin consultant vulture. It’s in the Domain Public.
Mood bell alarms – Mc Man himself could be said to b a turd?
YOU’LL HAVE TO SHOUT LOUDER THAN THAT.
I see neo guido has got the mod bot control again
From one turd to another.
The greater story here is how the police union and indeed the doctor’s union are trying to bring the government down.
I smell Common Purpose’s hand in this whole Mitchell Affair.
We have a quisling 5th column in our midst.
Perhaps it is time for the Quango’s to be collapsed, and Common Purpose to be rendered socially unacceptable / employable. Revocation of their charitable status in the UK could be a way forward here.
This will be looked at (maybe) when Cameron’s membership card expires
During the middle ages, talkative women were punished by being forced to wear metal cages on their heads.
Don’t forget the ducking stool from those more enlightened times.
Didn’t even bother reading the 270+ comments
MacAlpine – is a fucking turd himself along with his legal turds.
Is Maclepine not a turd himself?
Police Federation.
Royal College of Nurses
British Medical Association
British Airline Pilots Association
The Law Society
ALL Trades Unions by any other name
And as for ACPO they take the unionised biscuit.
You forgot The First Division Association of Sir Humphreys
You Modding fuckers need to take ‘take a good look at the BIGGER PUBLIC PICTURE” OUT THERE – You are not going to stop the public wrath against the corruption – it is an unstoppable force and those who are seen to be ignorant and craven AND helping to attempt to oppress the public wrath will be hunted down ‘lawfully’ [I must add] as WELL. 2 FACED-Hunts
Do fucking excuse me but I used the C letter whereas the H letter seems to have replaced it.
Sorry folks – you jus’ gotta stay in the EUSSR! – we need you there – so tough!
We’ll fix a few things here and there to make sure you stay!
That’s arl!!
Try legislating laws against the Hollyweirdo & Video manufacturers of indoctrinating ‘killing games / Movies’ before you have a go at the NRA or are yuo too beholden to their $?
Properly funding mental health programs is really the place to start, and perhaps reduce the amount of psychotropic drugs unnecessarily prescribed – particularly to kids.
Nothing wrong with violent movies / video games: Stats in Canada and Europe confirm that.
Quite.
Mass killings in American schools predate video games of any kind by at least a decade.
And Manson style random slaughter by two decades.
First massacre at a school in US was 1927, Bath MI.
Bomb was used, 45 killed 58 injured. Av. Age Victims: 11 yrs
- Also the worst. No Guns involved.
Worst school massacre so far seems to be: Beslan, North Ossetia 2004
386 Dead, over 700 injured.
(Pro-Chechen armed rebels took more than 1,200 school children and adults hostage – Russian security forces got involved in fire fight)
- Not in the US, or involving US forces.
Both cases, ‘killing games / movies’ not a factor.
In the US, over 55% of firearms fatalities / year (c. 33k total) are suicides.
There is something not right, but it is not the gun ownership.
Total BULL as regards violent vids & games
Its up to all parents [without govnmet interference] to stop their kids from slowly becoming vegetables of the war games manufcturers – Burn the vids & ban the younger kids [who develope into monsters] from living a false life in isolation in their rooms – becoming day by day so introverted and sociallyinept.
No Mr NRA – you have got the hollyweirdos and their long term indoctrination of young kids – badly WRONG.
You are talking about a myriad of other social issues there.
The ‘isolation’ aspect is the important part which goes deeper than just movies and games.
Was this about Microwaves, Macquarrie report or who has shagged the best hooker ?
See if Andrew Neil drops any hints about it on this week
Not convinced that a judge should force medical treatment on anyone.
In fact I am fully convinced that a Judge should not have any say.
mmm I had been pondering that one , although more in depth story in early bits of story were based around alternative therapy , rather than risk to life . But your right in perhaps pondering where state should and should not go .
State is obliged to prevent unbalanced mother causing death of child by preventing him from having the appropriate treatment for his life threatening condition.
It is the job of a judge to decide such things. Or would you prefer the doctors to just go ahead regardless without a fair hearing of the issues having taken place?
Eniplacam is just another old t.urd attempting to conceal his miscreant past.
Is Paul Mason on drugs ?
Historical Tractor statistics from Stonehaven through Aberystwyth to Bournemouth have been long noted. There’s Something Ironic about Mary – Ha, Ha, Ha!!!
Rabbit Rabbit Rabbit – re: ‘n seg.
Looks like the US Senate is hell bent on destroying the US middle classes.
Boy did they make a mistake not choosing Mitt.
It doesn’t take a fucking genius to work out who I am – I am however and have been a fucking pain in their rses – and they can’t do diddly squat about me – BECAUSE TO DO SO – is for them to reveal their dirty hidden hand???
Candy / baby / take from / like / stupid / duplicitous / Wanchors
Barry Obama. Liibertarian NOT!
A bunch of private equity funds have started shedding and recommended shedding holdings in the corporations which manufacture weapons in the US. This could have interesting consequences.
mmmm interesting news night on facebook and images and the search for making money , how very Blair mmmm so we now want the knowledge sharing economy to make money , iam sure it will stave off the millions under and un employed , or has it created that very poverty ?? the goblet of wonk awaits its first gulpers nearly said it though Jared , nearly said it eh ….
It doesnt really look that good for tony when history looks at the long disaster zone he left behind .
Anyhow things to do ect , have a good christmas etc and see how PM walks into brussels in jan , assuming that is the mayans werent that good at maths
Really have a good christmas , the corporations have spoiled it a bit , but its still legal , to celebrate the birth/arrival of Christ the saviour , in this country, well the non gay marriage version anyway, for now .
You are cordially invited to Guido’s Christmas drinks, which will be held at 4:30pm tonight, Wednesday, at the Westminster Arms, 9 Storey’s Gate, SW1. Join fellow readers, co-conspirators, Westminster wonks, movers and shakers, and seasoned drunks as we toast the end of another year of plots, rumours and conspiracy.
Thank you so much for the invite and I shall be there along with several Essex girls to bring relief to your guests.
Well, it seems that Mr Mitchell has been treated to the kinds of unpleasantness and dirty tricks which many a defendant has been known to complain about and the Commissioner of the Met is standing by his officers. Quite why he would support people who are such unreliable witnesses of fact is beyond me. I still don’t understand why the officers concerned were so high and mighty not to want to open the gate in the first place, but to then start casually lying about the incident suggests they may not be the sort of people we need in the police.
The back story here is interesting.
So who in the Cabinet Office authorized the release of the CCTV footage to Mitchell?
Who then gave it to the media?
Under what legal authority? Did he apply under the Data Protection Act or Freedom of Information Act or was it just a copy for a mate?
Did the release fully comply with the Information Commissioner’s Code of Conduct?
Who thought it was a good idea to put the full video of the Downing Street Security Measures out on the web when anyone who tried to film them might find themselves stopped searched and arrested under the Terrorism Act?
That thing on McAlpines desk looks like a coloured gentlemans walloper after a dip in a cold swimming pool.
A previous pictorial take on this doing the rounds:
http://postimage.org/image/kbpyi9b9j/
I would recommend a diet and some surgery as usual.
why is that there? is that normal ?