Andrew Neil asks Harman:
“What’s the logic of say the online site of the New Statesman coming within this regulation? A site which has no great influence in Westminster, whereas the Guido Fawkes, probably the most influential site in Westminster, should not?”
Reform the House of Lords | Nigel Farage
Labour Members Don’t Believe Ed Can Be PM | Rafael Behr
How China Bought Britain | London Loves Business
Why Dave Shouldn’t Check His Twitter | Buzzfeed
Young People Getting More Libertarian | ConHome
How to Write a Dan Hodges Column | Left Foot Forward
Politicians Made This Mess | Douglas Carswell
Magna Carta – Walking in King John’s Footsteps | Anna Raccoon
How to Stop Reckless Bankers | Guido Fawkes
Tories Double Younger Support | Guardian
Public Prefers Boris to Dave | Times
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Andrew Pierce on Ed Balls…
“Porky Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls sweet-talked guests at a fund-raising dinner by saying if he wasn’t a politician, he would be a chef. That’s not surprising, since he was accused of cooking the Treasury books when he was Gordon Brown’s boot boy.”
Bloody foreigners, coming over here taking all our twitter followers
[puts thumb to nose and waggles fingers]
I’m never influenced other than adding another black mark against the website when I set up the new Tom Watson led State Association for Security Initiatives (STASI) to purge society of those people who keep wanting to go too far too fast and don’t believe in society.
When is Guido going to attempt another culling of politicians? This time with semtex perhaps?
Happy Winterval
That quote is why Harriet is after Guido’s ass. Liebour have wupped the dead tree press into line, the blogosphere is next.
Season Greetings to Harman. Shove your media controls up yer Nazi Ass. You old goose.
Time for more heads to roll Guido
New Statesperson, please.