November 6th, 2012

NUJ’s Two Fingers to Members

Increasingly isolated NUJ boss Michelle Stanistreet has unilaterally announced the union’s support for state regulation of the press. Somewhat unbelievably not asking members first, Stanistreet blustered:

“We believe that if we are to achieve independent, accountable regulation it needs to be underpinned by statute enabling a framework for a new body to be established with clear terms of reference and a structure that involves journalists and civil society as key stakeholders.”

Just who are the “we” she was speaking for remains unclear. Certainly several prominent journalists have expressed their disbelief that such a decision would be made without balloting members first:

How to lose members and alienate yourself…


37 Comments

  1. 1
    Kebab Time says:

    urg – journos

    Like

  2. 2
    Anonymous says:

    God awful, do as we say not as we do lefties. They really are the fucking pits.

    Like

  3. 3
    Badly Packed Kebab says:

    First

    Like

  4. 5
    1984 says:

    The NUJ has no more legitimacy than any other organisation. If they don’t like the NUJ then quit and start another union.

    Un-fucking-believable.

    Like

  5. 6
    london man says:

    State control is no way regulate the press. The libel laws regulate the press. I worked for an embassy as a PR but could not get union membership due to their statsi rules. A new union is sequired.

    Like

  6. 7
    UKIP.i.am says:

    The state is the emasculator of press freedom. Unions are their knives.

    Like

  7. 8
    None of the above says:

    Does Stanistreet live in a council house like most other £150k pa Union leaders?

    Like

  8. 9
    Engineer says:

    “Key stakeholders” eh? How about the general public as ‘key stakeholders’? After all, it’s us the journalists are supposed to be informing, and on our behalf they are supposed to be investigating and exposing wrongdoing.

    Like

  9. 11
    Terrible But True says:

    ‘Just who are the “we” she was speaking for remains unclear.’

    It’s a unique thing.

    Ask the BBC, who speak for the nation, by all accounts… well theirs… which no one else can hold them to, despite being a nationally funded, unelected, £4 billion per annum media monopoly.

    So it’s always fun when the 4th estate suddenly includes ‘us’.

    ps: Nic ‘One source close to the prime minister told me’ Robbo’s at it again (as his mods take out post with defamatory links… to the Guardian: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20210268

    Like

  10. 14
    Sir Dando Tweakeshafte says:

    Well if a key stakeholder would be so kind as to hold the stake steady, I have a stout mallet.

    Like

  11. 15
    ed martin says:

    its as though german unions were demanding a new hitler

    Like

  12. 18
    truth says:

    Can anyone explain why television should be subject to statutory regulation whereas newspapers don’t? Does it prevent television from carrying out investigations like that which put away the evil care workers?

    Like

  13. 19
    Chavtasitic Benefits says:

    I think the ‘we’ she was referring to was her extra chin(s).

    Like

  14. 20
    Tay King-dePisse says:

    Maybe she had better deed-poll to Michelle “Qu*eerstreet,” because that’s where she’s going to find herself if she keeps this shit up. (I make no other innuendos of any kind– gotta be careful nowadays, yeah?)

    Like

  15. 21
    Koba says:

    Unions are the enemies of the people

    Like

  16. 22
    Anonymous says:

    If it’s anything like state regulation of the banks then they’ve nothing to worry about.

    Like

  17. 24
    David B says:

    It shows that the Unions and Labour think that the solution to every problem is more government, which means more tax, which means more civil servants

    Like

  18. 25
    Snapper John says:

    Sorry to let the truth get in the way of a good story, but the NUJ is asking for an independent press regulator, not state control. See:
    http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/nuj-leader-michelle-hits-back-sun-jibes-and-says-union-wants-regulator-free-owners-control

    Like

    • 30
      CHRIST ON A BIKE! says:

      “independent” means appointed by politicians, in government!

      Like

    • 36
      Feeling down says:

      Most journal,s especially them at the bbc are right up the lefts arses and deal in propaganda , I don’t sympathise with them at all.

      Like

  19. 26
    Fuct says:

    I left the NUJ last year when our ex dear leader took a 45k fucking off fee when he knew the finances were fucked. The the “election” debacle … Lack of transparency over expenses……. Now this.

    Like

  20. 28
    Anonymous says:

    The NUJ has been out of touch with it’s members for years.

    Like

  21. 29
    CHRIST ON A BIKE! says:

    If you want to know the true political motivation behind any really bad idea, just look at the people who support it. NUJ, like every other Union, is run by Marxist fvckwits. Tells you that the Left believe that a state regulated press is a good idea, why? because it means that news dissemination will more likely support left-wing orthodox opinions, guarantee the even more rapid demise of the press and the even greater dominance of broadcast news, that is dominated by their old chums at the BBC.

    Except Mr Savile may have put something of a very large spanner in the works, as far as the cuddly BBC are concerned.

    Like

  22. 31
    Tax is theft says:

    Looks to me like somebody wants to see the end of a free press and that the state regulation – a role which will be handed to the BBC in the interests of *impartiality (ha ha ha!)- will be the final arbiter of what can and can not be published.
    Be afraid….. be very fcuking afraid…

    Like

  23. 32
    Anonymous says:

    Is it even worth mentioning that you can’t actually have statutory regulation of the press? The definition would have to either be incredibly wide (taking in anyone who posts news, even on facebook) which would be defeated easily by everyone ignoring it as there isn’t enough money to enforce it or the definition would fall solely on print and maybe some other traditional outlets online which is INCREDIBLY EASY to sidestep. Yes it would mean the end of lobby hacks and being invited along on trips but instead you’d have people calling themselves something like news aggregators instead of journalists, and they’d get the news another way. Another way that isn’t regulated of course. Happens all the time in other professions, which is why it’s only used for a few that want it and can pay for it.

    Like

  24. 34
    M says:

    I’m sure the national union of peadophiles would offer their support to the boss of the NUJ !

    Like


Media Reader

BBC: It Was Guido Wot Won It | MediaGuido
Nick Robinson’s Britain First Selfie | Metro
Endless Hypocrisy of Russell Brand | Speccie
Can Anyone Believe A Word Roy Greenslade Says? | TFA
Censorship Hashtag Campaigns Harm Free Speech | Guardian
Plebgate Trial Kicks Off | Sun
I Stung the Fake Sheikh | Speccie
Labour’s War on the Media is Working | Speccie
Battle for Fleet Street | Mark Wallace
Bill Cosby’s Massive Social Media Fail | NY Post
Silence of the Spinners | Media Guido


Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


Ralph Miliband on the English…

“The Englishman is a rabid nationalist. They are perhaps the most nationalist people in the world.”



Left on Left says:

The lefties are attacking because the panellist is a millionaire and lives in a London home worth upwards of two million. Someone had best tell them he’s called Ed Miliband.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,597 other followers