Poll Verdict: No to Publishing Kate Topless Pics
4,310 co-conspirators voted in Guido’s poll.
The verdict was no to publishing Kate pics by a margin of 58% (2,482) / 42% (1,828).
Google is your friend…
4,310 co-conspirators voted in Guido’s poll.
The verdict was no to publishing Kate pics by a margin of 58% (2,482) / 42% (1,828).
Google is your friend…

I Signed Official Secrets Act for Bilderberg | Watford Mayor
Is There Any Point in G8 Summits? | ConHome
Mercer Declares Payment From Undercover Reporter | Telegraph
Snowden Q&A Raises More Questions Than Answers | Alex Wickham
In Praise of Our Political Class | Janan Ganesh
Nadine For Strictly Come Dancing | BBC
We May Have to Intervene in Syria | Ben Brogan
Miliband’s World View is Bankrupt | Dan Hodges
Awkward Obama Putin Moments | Buzzfeed
Twigg’s Incoherent Schools Policy | Mark Wallace
Why Osborne Should Get on With Bank Privatisation | Harry Phibbs

![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

Andrew Pierce on Ed Balls…
“Porky Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls sweet-talked guests at a fund-raising dinner by saying if he wasn’t a politician, he would be a chef. That’s not surprising, since he was accused of cooking the Treasury books when he was Gordon Brown’s boot boy.”

is there anyone in the world that Tony hasnt screwed in some way?




Saw a quote saying MSM have agreed not to publish (UK) …
Which means they’ll be in the Sun on Monday.
And if the Sun prints them the Left won’t be able to complain. After all, having published Harry’s willy the other week, the Sun would just be trying to redress the balance and meet the 40% minimum female quota….
I remember Anne Diamonds comments about something similar to this a few years ago. When she first started out in television she was told by her boss to never, ever, ever go topless or nude ANYWHERE outdoors or visible to the public, no matter how “private” the place is as someone will always get the photo. At the time she was quite tidy, so the photo’s would have been worth a bit (unfortunately she is a bit of a munter now, so topless photo’s now would only end up on a “specialist” website).
Anyway, Kate now knows that NOWHERE is private and she’ll not do that again, hopefully.
I have a picture of Prince William’s cock if you’re interested ℬilly?
I have a picture of man with a big cock.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Al5DwZmCWfI/SqAUDfu6-uI/AAAAAAAAB5o/XlewHS3E8TA/s400/Man+and+a+big+cock.jpg
What a super cock.
Bloody Hell!!
But we have agreed to gang up on Mitt Romney at his presser to see if he would walk back his statement about the Cairo Embassy apology for being broken into:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/09/12/video-cbs-and-npr-reporter-plot-insure-romneys-asked-if-he-regrets-obama
Those two Spencer boys have undone all the good work done by the Queen over decades in just a few weeks. FFS why did Kate go poncing around in the great outdoors in the bollocky buff? William should have told her to keep her kit on. And as far as the protection squad goes that long lens could just as easily been a sniper scope.
Diana and her family have been a complete disater for the British Monarchy.
+1 – should never have got them out in the first place.
Nothing to see. Move along please.
Only one is a Spencer boy…the other is a Hewitt boy.
Gingers rule!
Should have kept on her Hardy Amies, Windsor plc, model burka?
I have seen bigger fried eggs…. oo
so 48% are MORONS
58%
42%
It would be 132% except for me keeping it off the books.
Dyslexia rules.
What a disgrace. I demand Royal boobage.
http://tinyurl.com/9cvso2f
Absolutely. We support them so out with the Jubs!
Try again.
Your link is surely to a figure in Madame tussauds.
Yes to bottomless Princes
No to topless Duchesses
So we know the readers preferences
One of the tests we will be using on our young people where we have suspicions, tight trousers, large man bags etc.
I’d hardly say the Prince was ‘bottomless’ darling – I most definitely saw a bottom, and it was even more delectable than any of my toy boys!
PLEASE rescue me from this Sao Paulo favela Prince of Darkness .
I’ll do ANYTHING !!!
Sewer politics.
With Guido’s successes at exposing the whole political establishment that appears to resemble a cesspit, it would be uncalled for / excess to requirements toilet humour to post pictures attacking the ‘throne’.
I love a good paddle in the cesspit
Well, dear, you’ve spent enough time up sh*t creek without one.
Oi!…piss off and find your own cesspit.
Get off me back you jerk !
we may be unruly but most of us know where the line is.
Yes, right under my hooter, along the back of a black hooker.
The Unions are the real beauties of this Country
Bob Crow has got a lovely pair of mammaries
I may be forced to use a small part of my 1.5M pension pot to legally challenge this.
And Moobs to you.
He is a tit, after all.
42% would prefer OOgle to be their friend.
The vote is almost evenly split….. could we not just see her left tit ?
Do you want the Diana “Spit Roast” pictures?
Link?
Semi-skimmed?
shame you even had to ask
un-pixalated fron cover here > http://kebabtime.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/so-thats-what-fuss-is-about.html
“I hold the world but as the world, 8illy; A stage where every man must play a part, And yours is a sad one”
Good grief B8lly, what’s all the fuss about? I’ve seen better on a Barbie doll. No wonder the poor lass is embarrassed!
The french (sic) love intruding on the privacy of our Royals.
It led to the death of Diana.
Let’s be blunt. We all hate the frogs; here’s a great reason to hate them some more.
I have a couple of French rifles from World War II I’m selling. They’re in great condition: never been fired, dropped once.
Nice one Frank, and oh so true!
Shake shake shake
Shake shake shake
Shake my booty
Shake my booty
As Wellington said “we are,always have been ,and I trust always will be ,detested by the French.”
Good, a bit of decorum at last!
If you really need to see them I’m sure you’ll find them on the interweb thingy.
Did a Google, they really are not that great.
Maybe Wills could pump them up bit.
Now Pippas I would pay to see.
It’s no big deal.
However, I would rather see her worst bits than your best ones.
You know this democracy thing could catch on. We had better nip it in the bud.
Hello? What have I been saying all this time?
But we’ll do it our own way, thank you anyhow, Mr EU.
flat as a poached egg anyroad. Gimme mamms, gurt normus udders.
Over exposed and under developed.
Politicians in 5 words Ripper.
Just how many holidays have these two people been on this year ?
We are all in this together .
Hey this voting was not fair. I live in a constituency where my vote is considered by Labour and the Lib-Dems to be worth a lot more than the average person’s vote. I demand an extra 24% of a vote.
http://s16.postimage.org/mhez6f7sl/Capture.jpg
42% is about all you can see!
It’s all a storm in a AAA cup.
What about the ‘couldn’t care less’ option?
Few people ever bother with the apathy option, somehow it just seems like too much trouble.
Do they have nothing to do but sit in the sun?
I demand a recount !
They are on Google and all over the Net anyway.
And they look much better than Harry’s did. Fwoah.
Publish and be mammed.
lol
Come on it’s only tits, Guido grow some balls and post the images.
It had to be a Berlusconi publication didn’t it.
And Brussels want us to help bail out Italy……….
the sun will keep there integrity by calling them breasts
Shock Horror, Kate has tits.
Well we sort of knew that anyway and there are plenty on the internet.
non-story of the year IMHO
(Unless we can find some way to embarrass the french)
Number 1 story on ITV news.
See the Real Kate Middleton Topless picture here @ http://uploadsociety.com/Stoneface-amp-Terminal-Venus-_v8316
everything is being exposed except levison
you can see him live on TE-Levison
Actually from her sartorial curvature I never thought she could vaunt decent puppies .
But now I’ve seen the photos …..
Why not? The silly mare shouldve kept em tucked up.
Bare titted idiot.
Closer magazine in France is owned by Mondadori, a publishing company owned by the former Italian president Silvio Berlusconi
But you’ll find an excuse to publish them anyway.
And you’ll find an excuse to look at them while tut-tutting at it all.
Was she playing billiards?
Majority of Guido’s window lickers are PRUDES. If I were an editor I would have published. I lolove perfectly formed goolies.
Eurozone faces meltdown and/or Soviet-style imposed federation without democratic approval, UK invites triple-dip & praps decade-long recession, yet you/media obsessed with a pair of tits (I mean him and her). Millions out there need real jobs, and thousands of your lot (who can’t tell the difference between “shined” and “shone”) waste your time on this crap?
Well said, I have to say I feel a complete tit now.
Closer ‘magazine’ is a load of shite anyway…why would anyone with a functioning braincell buy it ???
What a pathetic performance. If the palace idiots had ignored it there would have been no drama at all. The poor cow will never make page 3 and that’s a fact. With tits like a couple of bee stings she should have kept them well and truly covered. These royals must be as thick as two short planks. First her brother-in-law, pissed out of what passes for his brains, invites a couple of dozen total strangers to join him in his suite in Las Vegas, takes his clothes off for a bet and later the palace, without a hint of irony, starts screaming about invasion of privacy. Now they are going to court in France (of all places) and will probably make themselves look even bigger fools than they are already.
They should at least try to remember what happened to the French royal family…
I like it when the Royals act like this @ http://uploadsociety.com/user/Solartrancer
so how many visited your site and didn’t bother to vote on this highly important issue?
as the song goes \ thanks for the mammaries/