September 14th, 2012

Kate Middleton Topless Photos


151 Comments

  1. 1
    Pawn Sandwich says:

    One is not amused, two is ok.

    Like

  2. 2
    Selohesra says:

    Go on – I dare you :)

    Like

  3. 3
    Alex Salmond's Fat Belly says:

    Also if you could digitally de-blur them? Just so I know how outraged I should be.

    Like

  4. 4

    No. Leave her be.

    Like

  5. 5
    Whippersnapper2 says:

    Who cares about her tits? Just about as boring as anybody else’s.

    Like

  6. 6
    peasant says:

    No, you should not publish but you should be free to do so.

    Why can’t they just keep their clothes on?

    Like

  7. 7
    Peter Ould says:

    It would be a serious mistake for what is up till now a highly regarded blog. Don’t make this error, even if others do.

    Like

  8. 8
    Pisswilliam says:

    Frankly, I couldn’t give a fiddler’s fuck. When you’ve seen one tit…

    Like

  9. 9
    Lord Pension of Abolish after I've left says:

    Tittle Tattle, Gossip and Rumours…

    Or just another Sleb Rag

    Your choice

    Like

  10. 10
    Whippersnapper2 says:

    I think the publication of these pictures should start a 5 million man march of the vermin. I think a hijab would go well with the pics. too.

    Like

  11. 11

    Crikey you poms ate getting uptight. Get her baps onto page three. Not as good as Pippa’s arse but it’ll do for now.

    Like

  12. 12
    National Socialist says:

    Not interested but isn’t she extremely flat-chested?
    As you say, nothing to see here…

    Like

    • 33
      Anonymous says:

      I think it is unfair to say she is ‘flat-chested’…

      I’d take her ‘bee-stings’ over Kate Moss’s wasp stings any day…

      Like

      • 100
        Anonymous says:

        agree. Her boobs are very average. But Willism admitted it was her legs that first attracted him to her. She does have amazing legs!

        Like

  13. 13
    Sir Tristram Oldtwat says:

    Guido your headline should read “Royal paps expose Royal paps!!”

    Like

  14. 14
    Roger The lodger says:

    Guido, you’ve been exposing tits for years. why ask our permission now?

    Like

  15. 16
    Tom says:

    Just do it you big cock teases

    Like

  16. 17
    Loungelizard says:

    No, that photograph of Blair’s breasts a few years ago just about finished me off.

    Like

  17. 18
    Diddley says:

    ‘Woman has tits’, hardly news, is it?

    Like

  18. 19
    The Crayfish Twins says:

    “Edwina on John Major:

    ‘John Major was a sexy beast. I think his history shows that. He was 19 when he was living with a woman who was 33. Believe me, I did not have to teach that man anything. He was experienced and fun.’”

    Cor! Let’s have a photo of John Major topless.

    Like

  19. 20
    Anonymous says:

    Are people making mountains out of mole hills?

    Like

  20. 21
    Rewind1616 says:

    Frankly I’d be outraged!

    Whilst having a wank

    Like

  21. 22
    Scamp The Excitable Dog says:

    Keep it in your trousers Guido, this isn’t fucking Heat mag and you are still taken seriously by some of us believe it or not.

    Like

  22. 24
    Gordon Brown says:

    You should see the size of my lens!

    Like

    • 146
      PROPHET MOHAMMED says:

      Yes I did it’s wide angle and they are very small unlike mine which is a telephoto zoom and slides in and out with ease

      Like

  23. 25
    Why bother? says:

    They’ll be on the internet soon anyway.

    Like

  24. 26
    Swiss Bob says:

    Grow up.

    Like

  25. 28
    Romuald Rat says:

    Nothing to see here

    Like

  26. 29
    God says:

    What tits? As far as I can see they are singularly unimpressive, to the extent that one could say that ALL picures of Kate show her to be utterly “topless”! On the Richter scale of tits, she rates 1/10

    Like

  27. 31
  28. 32
    Anonymous says:

    Of course you should publish them…everyone in the world will be looking at these photos today, why should the UK be excluded?

    Like

  29. 34
    Col Nut says:

    The Royals are going tits up.

    Like

  30. 36
    horehound says:

    Get a life, or preferably an actual women.

    Like

  31. 37
    John Hutton, the one true prophet, says:

    She’s the future queen, a bit of deference even from former subjects in Ireland would seem to be in order

    Like

  32. 39
    Lord Scalded Bollock says:

    This is an outrage !

    First Harry’s buttocks,now Kate’s tits.

    Whatever next ?……Pippa’s arse ?

    Pass the port please Dave,thank you so much.

    Like

  33. 40
    Oneisnotamused says:

    You need a ‘No (but Yes)’ option..

    Like

  34. 41
    smoggie says:

    That’s Guido’s knighthood fucked.

    Like

  35. 42
    Steve P says:

    No – but you should post a link to wherever on the web some irresponsible person HAS published them.

    Anyway we’ve seen the other end

    Like

  36. 46
    Qwerty says:

    She is one of the most famous women, in the entire world. If not the most famous.

    Followed 24/7 by the media and photographers.

    So she gets them out while on holiday.

    Grotesque Yes… Grotesquely stupid on her behalf.

    Like

  37. 48
    curious says:

    Define ‘we’ in your title

    Like

  38. 56
    Tony M says:

    What’s Levinson going to do about this? Oh – wait – fuck all as it is out of his jurisdiction.

    DO you think he understands the nature of the internet and borderless communications yet?

    Like

  39. 63
    Rupert my Hero says:

    It means in France one gets shot, one way or another…

    Like

  40. 65
    Liv Walker says:

    How depressing is this thread? Responses are 1) Yes, I’ll have a wank 2) No, she’s irrelevant or 3) No, her tits are too small.

    I personally don’t give a monkey’s about her but am suddenly and weirdly feeling sympathy…………

    Like

  41. 68
    White Van Man says:

    A vote?

    Order Order – a democracy now?

    Sod that – give me back the Guido dictatorship & get Kates tits on the front page please.

    Guido, what would Kelvin do?

    Like

  42. 72
    Anonymous says:

    As much as I would like to see these pictures and would defend your right to publish them: It’d be the wrong thing to do.

    Like

  43. 75
    Freddie Fraudster says:

    Why not organise a boycott of all advertisers in the magazine in question.

    With that, their Olympic Humiliation and the Euro crisis we could bring the French Government down … so its gotta be worth a go

    Like

    • 122
      Susie says:

      You forgot Wiggo winning their bicycle race.

      As a person with a very nice pair myself, I’d say anyone who needs a telephoto lens to photograph some woman who is 700 yards away has serious issues. I’d call them dirty old men, perverts or Peeping Toms — they need locking up.

      Like

  44. 76
    GMB says:

    I’m sure Kate’s tits feel right at home now they are royalty.
    They can just laze about all day doing fuck all.
    Surely they would not deny the nation a quick peek?
    Someone should ask them.

    Like

  45. 78
    TJ Wilson says:

    Can we all take a huge sigh…WHO CARES! Good for her that she was on vacation and she was with her husband. He didn’t seem to mind, so why should we?

    Like

  46. 80
    P says:

    Stupid question. The are published on the internet therefore they are published in the UK.

    Like

  47. 82
  48. 83
    Anonymous says:

    Kate Middleton Topless Pics @ Upload Society @ http://uploadsociety.com/Knightvision-The-Knight-Of-Vision_v7815

    Like

  49. 84
    Catherine says:

    Kate Middleton has posed for these photos. It was a bad idea because of the saggy A cup titties. I’m embarrassed to be in my 30s if this is a standard of beauty. I do not want my upward facing 36 year old breasts to sag so I can look like her. The foldy tummy on a woman so slim without kids screams loss of muscle tone due to poor hydration, and substance abuse. Remember all the tumbling out of nightclubs drunk? That stuff has consequences. Her skin is spongy, dry, and lacks elasticity. Women, don’t drink a lot of alcohol or caffeine, and if you do, drink at least 3 times that volume in water. Dehydration is the biggest cause of premature ageing.

    Waity Kate has a history of exhibitionism, remember the mooning out the window at college? And how about flashing pants getting out cars on several occasions? You can see her whole bottom at a military parade, and how does someone of her youth and connections doesn’t know to wear a straight slip or petticoat under her dress, and then doesn’t try to hold down the thing?

    She’s nasty, Ms. Jackson. Then, type “Kate Middleton upskirt” into Google images. You’ll get more than an eyeful. Okay, so she likes to show her naughty bits, but why now when she’s on tour? To get a lot of public sympathy. Because? She can’t get pregnant by William, and there’s the fact he married her because he’s a nice guy and married her as a public service, so as not to make her become the object of public ridicule. Now, she knows that she’s in a vulnerable position if he decides to chuck her, so she poses for the photos. Why am I suspicious? The French magazine, Closer, in which the photos are published, have a UK counterpart. Of course, the UK counterpart says that they don’t know anything about it, but she must have a PR team outside of Buckingham Palace.

    It’s clear that she’s posing. Look at how she stares directly at the camera through the sunglasses. Even if she can’t “see” the lenses, she is aware that she’s being observed. Then, it’s stupid to apply sunblock after you’ve already been exposed to the sun. It’s more sensible to put it on before you go outside. The sunblock was a prop to simulate or suggest masturbation, and to give her a reason to touch William. This shot will stand out to people as ‘evidence’ that they’re romantically involved. You can see the disinterested look on William’s face. He’s hunched and he’s not leaning into her hand, which means he is not getting aroused by her touch.

    Like

  50. 85
    Catherine says:

    Being a Royal has absolutely nothing to do with this. Kate’s a human being and has the same right to privacy as anyone else. I would be mortified if there were pics of me topless in a national newspaper. If we don’t treat everyone with the same respect we would like to have ourselves then, then we should be ashamed of ourselves. As for all the comments on whether her chest is adequate or not, we live in the 21st century. Surely we’ve moved beyond judging a womans worth by her physical appearance? Let’s get a grip and worry about the important things in life and leave the poor woman in peace and in private.

    Like

    • 91
      W.W. says:

      I think you have come to the wrong blog love.

      “Tittle tattle, gossip and rumour.”

      And this falls firmly into the ‘tittle’ catagory.

      Anyway haven#t you got some washing to do?

      W.W.

      Like

  51. 87
    Hang The Bastards says:

    The problem with the piucs is not the fact that she got caught topless, its the fact that William’s mouth is hanging off one of them.

    Like

  52. 88
    Teri says:

    Absolutely nothing to see here. Move along please

    Like

  53. 89
    Anonymous says:

    I dont understand why she is so upset??
    If she didnt wanna show them, she should have kept them cover!! Seriously… just because she is royal… give me a break

    Like

  54. 94
    keredybretsa says:

    These people must know that they are being watched and followed. They can’t be so stupid to think otherwise, or well, perhaps, who knows? Publish and be dammed one set of boobs more or less who cares? But I actually thought it was her tummy that was the centre of interest!

    Like

  55. 95
    Anonymous says:

    Yes. Why not ?

    Like

  56. 96
    kateisSTUPID says:

    Google is letting me down or I don’t have the skills…but I can’t fine any links to any kate topless pictures other than the ones on this sites and some of them have been shut. Frightening how things can be censured in the UK!

    Like

  57. 97
    Anonymous says:

    I just love every minute of the royal families agony
    Scum of the earth
    it could not of happened to nicer people
    what goes around
    comes around

    Like

  58. 98
    Anonymous says:

    big fucking deal

    Like

  59. 101
    S.B.S. says:

    If they can get her with a camera?
    They could have got her with a riflle, Royal protection? what a shower of useless bastards, under my protection that would never, ever, have happened.
    Sack them all !

    Like

  60. 102
  61. 104
    Albert Steptoe says:

    Another “well earned break” and Kate gets snapped with her grotesue bangers out? boohoo – how many freeloaded “well earned breaks” can one have? Lazy scrounging royals want it both ways – we have to put up with their over-exposure all summer, e.g River Farce, endless waving and lots of jolly freebies at Olympicszzzz, you live by the sword, you die by the sword…

    Like

  62. 106
    Les says:

    This is sad time – who is really interested in such pictures – perverts? These two young people are trying hard to adapt to a life of duty through proxy on behalf of the British people. Publishing these pictures insults me, and every other British person and member of the Commonwealth. Those who publish such photographs are doing because of the subject matter and to make money, they hold no personal moral or ethical philosophy whatsoever and in time will come to regret such ignorant action.

    Like

  63. 107
    Anonymous says:

    you can tell she isnt pregnant yet

    but what worries me is her titties are so small i think willies are bigger!!!!

    also if thats the best he can do man she will never be a baby machine
    she is to slight

    Like

  64. 108
    Bushwacker says:

    The Irish Times print topless photos of the lastest parasite to this brood and a spokesman, spokesperson surely, from Buckingham Palace comes up with the statement that ‘The Irish Times is motivated by greed’.
    This statement has to beat all known records of hypocricy considering how much money etc the royal family has ponced from the British taxpayer over the years.

    Like

  65. 110
    Pentangelis says:

    I really wish I could say I was in the least bit interested.

    Like

  66. 111
    Spodd says:

    Kate Middleton should be more careful if she doesn’t want things like this to happen. After all the Queen has never had ‘embarrassing’ photos published, why? Because she is just more sophisticated as to put herself into a position like Kate had! Perhaps Kate will learn from this? But if not, I’m sure Playboy magazine would pay handsomely for a centre spread!!!

    Like

  67. 112

    iv saw bigger cats eyes ondark nit theylget bigger when rub my hands gets her swelled up and a breast pump

    Like

  68. 115
    PROPHET MOHAMMED says:

    I would like to feel her tits but I am not allowed cos my cock would get aroused and I might ejaculate, You English and American men are lucky cos you can fuck a Muslim woman with hairy pussy

    Like

  69. 117

    Just show us the royal jugs Fawks, you blog wimp.

    Like

  70. 118
    oldanar says:

    The editors, publishers and owners who did this have made a really, really serious mistake. It is a very bad idea to mess with someone who can call on the entire services of MI6 to find out where you live, and whose brother-in-law drives an Apache attack helicopter. She should just ‘phone up Harry, he can get it cleared with someone high up (like his grandmother) and fly over and sort them out. Couple of hundred HE armour piercing cannon shells should be enough to fix the whole bunch of them.

    Like

  71. 120
    grow up says:

    It is said to even place this comment ,but here it is for those who belive that to comment on any thing other than there privicey was not even thouht of is small minded and probley dose nothing but jessel them selfs all day.So think this if it was your daughter or wife and your privecy that some one invaded would you still make stupid comments or enjoy some of the profound comments the animals in this blog are making .

    Like

    • 149
      PROPHET MOHAMMED says:

      There is no harm in leaving a comments provided it’s grammatically correct and with no spelling mistakes, unlike your comment, which, apart, from the bad grammar, contains at least five basic spelling mistakes. Either you are illiterate or ignorant so I suggest you go back to school and refrain from leaving further comments.

      Like

      • 150
        PROPHET MOHAMMED says:

        See if you can spot the two deliberate grammatical errors that I have purposely included in my previous comment. I will give you a 36C tit for each that you find.

        Like

  72. 121
    Anonymous says:

    Hello,
    I am the owner of the domain name katesboobs.com I wish to sell it and invite offers.
    It is most topical at the moment.
    Thanks.
    Neville Smith
    njsmith@gmail.com

    Like

    • 144
      Brokerman says:

      Hi how much do you want for it? You up for a swop? I am the owner of a site called harrieswilly.com I’ll also throw in harriescock.org as a make weight. What do you say’do we have a deal?

      Like

  73. 126
    THE PILFERING PARASITES of PARLIAMENT says:

    Topless is exactly what she is

    Like

  74. 127
    eric purvis says:

    how can you call it private every thing they own comes from the tax payer bloody paracites

    Like

  75. 136
    t0mmy says:

    anyone got any of her minge. what a carry on over a pair of tits.

    Like

  76. 138
    Bzza says:

    The pictures are rather boring, the tits in my garden are more interesting. However, the comments have had me in stitches for the last twenty minutes. Keep up the good work!

    Like

  77. 141
    Anonymous says:

    Tobacco pouches lol

    Like

  78. 142
    Anonymous says:

    She is rather on the scrawny side – I expect he views lots of porn to make up for it and, anyway, he can get all the snatch he wants and bill it to us – at least they seem to be hetero

    Like

  79. 143
    James says:

    To all those poor sod’s who seem to have never seen a pair of tits before … Enjoy ! LOL!

    Like

  80. 151
    Anonymous says:

    Grow up you guys, get a life. Boring, boring, boring!

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

5 Things We Learned From Guido’s Party | GQ
Revealed: Guido Fawkes Anniversary Dinner Guestlist | Peter Oborne
More Owen Jones Errors | Michael Ezra
Why Should Men Get Equal Maternity Leave? | Laura Keynes
Dentists Have Last Laugh Over Sneering Keynes | FT
Why’s Clegg Giving Men Paternity Leave? | Conservative Women
Cam Cannot Stem EU Immigration | David Keighley
9 Mansion Tax Questions for Ed Balls | TPA
Politicians are Lying to You About Immigration | Alex Wickham
Give Journalists Public Interest Defence in Law | Guardian
Cameron is Going to Have to Deal With UKIP | Dan Hodges


VOTER-RECALL
Find out more about PLMR


Chris Bryant talks to the Times Diary about a famous gay actor:

“I don’t think I’ve had sex with him. He says we had sex in Clapham. I’m fairly certain I’ve never had sex south of the river”



Progressive Inclusion Champion says:

Great to hear Carswell call for inclusive policies and that UKIP must stand for first and second generation immigrants as much as the English.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,534 other followers