Guido has learned that the Sindy‘s political correspondent Matt Chorley is jumping ship to become the first Political Editor of the MailOnline. Chorley has confirmed to Guido that he will start his new job on September 10, just in time for party conference season. The Sindy gets 120,000 odd readers and the MailOnline has some 5.3 million visitors a day. Quite a step up…
Lord Black v Press Regulation | Guardian
ABC Online Figures for Newspaper Websites | MediaGuido
Why Does the BBC Love Lefty Hacks? | Speccie
Coked-Up Celebs and Vengeful Politicians | Press Gazette
Saudi Arabia Silences Israeli Paper | The Commentator
UKIP Spokesperson Slaps Down BBC | The Commentator
It Was Beeb Not Tabloids That Smeared Help For Heroes | Speccie
Latest ABC Figures | Guardian
BBC Says Sorry For Newsnight Help For Heroes Report | BBC
Lineker Blows £15,000 of BBC Licence Fee on Taxis | Mail
Ian Katz to Newsnight | Speccie
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ed Balls stretches credulity by claiming he isn’t ambitious…
“I would love to be part of Ed’s Labour government but what I do next for me is not an all-consuming passion. I’m more bothered, in a personal sense, about getting to grade 8 piano by the time I’m 50.”
Ned Flanders – Clegg
Lisa Simpson – Natalie Bennett
Milhouse – Hilary Benn
Martin Prince – Andy Burnham
Edna Krabappel – Luciana Berger
Crazy Cat Lady – Glenda jackson
Comic book guy – John Prescott
Carl – Chucka
Lenny – Philip Hammond
Willie – Eric joyce
Poochie – Gordon Brown
Reverend Lovejoy – Tony Blair
Possibly not all the 5.3m read the political coverage?
Quite so, we log on for the daily updates on Kim Kardashian’s humongous arse.
I resemble that remark
He looks old enough to be a teenager!
Whilst in discourse, Plato, I just love the continuing pretentious fusion between philosophy and football: Michael Laudrup says Swansea’s philosophy attracted him to Wales. BBC this time but they all do it.
I wonder if it was the Categorical Imperative of Kant that clinched it?
Or the Dialectical Contradiction of Hegel, perhaps?
Perhaps it was the Primacy of the Concrete Particular Individual over any Systemisation of Reality according to Kierkegaard?
Philosophy is for air-headed retards.
I object most strongly to being called air-headed.
nah mate – it was ‘is cultured left foot
Who?
Matt Chorley = thick lefty eco-loon.
But will Chorley leave his left wing credentials at the door?
Or is the DM revamping itself to be more left wing?
He looks younger than me!
fascists.
Redistribute those readers so people will read the Guardian!
5.3 million readers a day, with the vast majority looking at the pictures and around 18 reading the politics.
I start with the Politics but end up looking at the pictures!
That’s why mailonline is doing well.
me too
I like the spate of articles about my own country that’s started appearing. Conquer new markets and all that stuff…
That’s 15 more than the Guardian then.
Never heard of him. Still, I look forward to all those “Fury” headlines with his face on the byline below.
can’t be too demanding – Mail political editing
wot about the great family of News of the World readers?
I bet the tossers never had his hands on a lathe or seen the inside of a factory.
Arbeit Macht Frei?
Are you posting from your lathe in a factory then? What has touching metalworking machines or visiting a factory got to to with some journo who’s a lot more successful than you’ll ever be.
How to write a DailyWail article
%MurderVictim% lived in %houseprice% house.
…whilst CLAIMING BENEFITS.
Somalian asylum seekers!
Careful when you park you blind old trout
Whatever you think of Ms Harman, using a hashtag isn’t blind or illiterate. I’m struggling to see the point of this post
I hope he’s done his research into Cheryl Cole and Kim Kardigan then.
The Mail…..online? Reminds me of the Dilbert cartoon where Dilbert gives the pointy haired boss an Etch-a-sketch and tells him to turn it upside down and shake to reboot it. How do journo’s under 75 at the Mail relate to their typical readership?
Fuck me modded for saying Cheryl Cole
Why the fuck is this site modding people for saying C H E R Y L C O L E ?????????????????????
Sounds very sensible to me,
er…off topic?
but most probably the C o l e bit as in H arr y C o l e
Why is H*rry C*le really Tweedy in drag then?
looks twee in drag probably
Mail Online….ah yes, that would be the gutless jobby that moderates out online comment it does not agree with or might piss off the owner.
Only gullible mugs of like mind read it regularly.
Actually, it’s one of the few places now where most comments are published, and unregistered readers get the opportunity to rec. or negatively rec. them. When they aren’t published, it’s usually because the site is overloaded. Many articles are unmoderated and only overload and the mods going off for breaks is the reason for non publication.
So says the “Mail Online”
Others know different!
Visit a lot of websites then? There are sites that are unmodded, but none of them are newspaper ones. I suggest you visit http://goatse.info for the truth about the Mail Online.
Like here then!
Actually the Online Telegraph goes one better it happily prints bollocks but quite often won’t allow comments on the more sensitive items…they think we have not noticed….FAIL!
When the nutty Norwegian shot other Norwegians, the Telegraph was full of posts defending his actions. The Telegraph is the sociopathic Nazis paper of record.
twisted crazy naz1 extremist he may have been, but his logic was sound enough, even if psychotic and murderous. Socialist facilitators of destruction of indigenous cultures, perhaps, some may say, had it coming.
So another lefty get’s a very influential job at a “conservative” publication. Mind you, backs-up what I’ve long suspected, that the Mail’s editorial staff are closet left-wingers ranting away as charactured right-wingers, so that Radio 4 can ridicule them.