February 29th, 2012

Pilgrim Consultation Due to Start Imminently
Nick Hurd Confirms Wider Scope

Nick Hurd has confirmed that the government consultation into “Pilgrims” is “about to start imminently”. He told a feisty Westminster Hall debate on taxpayer funding of trade unions:

“We will seek to review and rebalance the amount time off for Trade Uion duties… the current level is significantly more that the private sector… The consultation I’ve just described is focussed on the civil service, where my responsibilities as a Minster lie. However other colleagues who have responsibility for these matters in the wider public sector have been asked by the PM to review the position in their sectors.”

A good starting point is why should the taxpayer fund those that want to destroy the Olympics, costing the taxpayer even more money…


46 Comments

  1. 1
    Just one point says:

    Oh, can i trust them to keep my details safe tho?

    Like

    • 4
      jgm2 says:

      Not according to Brown. Apparently they sold details of his child’s illness to the newspapers. And Brown wouldn’t lie about that would he?

      Like

    • 7
      Chuckus Yamoney says:

      With the government having to borrow £450 million every day to fund overspending, why should tax payers bankroll any independent private interest lobby group.

      Like

    • 20
      nellnewman says:

      Actually I think it would be instructive to see a detailed public list of every pilgrim employed across the country. Where they’re employed, what they’re supposed to be doing and how much we pay them. Available on the web would be good.

      Like

  2. 2
    jgm2 says:

    Their union should be charged pro-rata for the number of hours these Pilgrims skive during Tax-payer time.

    Back-dated. With interest. Same as if you were caught fiddling your taxes. Which is exactly what these c*unts are doing. Tax fiddlers.

    Like

  3. 3
    Bongler says:

    Consultation? Review?

    Get on with it!

    Like

  4. 5

    Union’s don’t care about the Olympics.
    Those billions should have been used to make more pilgrim’s

    A waste of £24bn. That could have paid for a whole Labour party full of Pilgrims.

    Like

    • 8
      jgm2 says:

      Correction Bill – at present rates of cash-burn 24bn would still only pay for about two months of Labour’s Pilgrims.

      Like

      • 17
        Anonymous says:

        I didn’t want the UK to fund or hold the Olympics in those far off days when Labour were in power.
        I still don’t.
        But Union bosses seeking to disrupt the games need for once to stop thinking about themselves and remember the athletes who have trained for years to take part.

        Like

        • 23
          jgm2 says:

          I didn’t want it either. But the money has been spent now and we’re stuck with it. For the Unions to take the opportunity to proclaim to the world that they’re living in the 1970s would be a …disappointment. Although not a surprise or a ‘shock’ as Warsi claimed. I’d say it was entirely predictable. Remember- this is the same mind-set that used to have miners walking out every winter, freezing the elderly and poor to death in their homes just because they fancied more money. Hostage-taking is what unions do.

          We should get the Israelis or the Russians on the job. They know how to deal with hostage-takers.

          Like

    • 36
      M says:

      Could get pilgrims to hold the targets for the archery
      Call it “tax payers category ” where the competitors try to hit a running target

      Like

  5. 9
    sockpuppet #4 says:

    Destroying the olympics is olympicist.

    Its like hitler all over again.

    Like

  6. 10
    Sky's Peter Poofter says:

    I’m certain he’ll make a fist of it

    Like

  7. 12
    Jimmy says:

    A consultation you say? About to start? And imminently to boot?

    A triumph indeed.

    Like

  8. 14
    Screwed taxpayer. says:

    Any work time spent on union duties should be unpaid, to be made up with additional hours paid at normal rates, not overtime. Simples.
    Why are waste time “consulting”. DO IT DAVE — OR ARE YOU TOO WEAK WILLED AS USUAL?

    Like

  9. 15
    Fat Boy says:

    Male union members are winkle dicks

    Their false accents make me laugh

    Bob Crow is a pantomime dame with a little willy

    Like

  10. 16

    At least Brown won’t be around for the Olympics.
    Embarrassing enough to have the protests of the ‘gold pension’ Unite lobby.
    Without one of the Olympic rings becomes detached and we see on the TV Gordon running to escape as a bloody great hoop chases him around the running track.
    He manages to climb the winners podium to escape as the hoop rolls off down the A2.
    But then he topples backwards into the eternal flame.

    You know with Gordon involved it wouldn’t be that far fetched. Cobra would have had a scenario for it.
    “Codeword Gimprun -GO GO GO”

    Like

  11. 18
    Red Len - Red Ed's boss says:

    Attack the Pig Grims and I will call on the general public to engage in civil disobedience.

    Like

    • 21
      nellnewman says:

      ++Smile++

      asking the public to come out in support with civil disobedience is like bobcrow asking the pensioners to walk out into the middle of the M4 to stage a sitdown.

      Nobody’s listening. Not going to happen.

      Like

  12. 19
    John Bunyan says:

    Now, perhaps we can make some Progress!

    Like

  13. 25
    JH says:

    The uppity little union fucks should be grateful to have a job in the first place.

    Useless, whining bastards.

    Like

  14. 27
    Workers should oppose pilgrims too says:

    This campaign is hilarious. The only people who gain from the current arrangements are the union hierarchies and the labour parties.

    Contrary to what the uninformed like to believe, Pilgrims/Union fulltimers and the leaders are ANTI strike and anti industrial action. This is for the simpke reason that there privaleged position depends on the being able to discipline their rank and file.

    As the (barely reported) industrial action (and worker victories) in the construction sector in recent months demonstated, workers win when they oppose the bosses AND the union hierarchies. Anti-strike laws are essentially unenforcable if the union bureacracies are bypassed.

    Like

    • 35
      Anonymous says:

      I was a union member until I realised the union hierarchy couldn’t give a shit about the pay or conditions of the rank and file and were only interested in high-profile cases.
      So I left.

      Like

  15. 28
    john miller says:

    Ho ho ho…

    Spot the weasel words – rebalance!

    This government have done fuck all and they will sincerely pursue that course of action on all fronts.

    Like

  16. 30
    Lenin Marx-Cluskey ( nee Karlmarx) says:

    Now look here Guidooo .. if ah wannah declare a General Strike to stop the English Olympics that’s mah business. Ah dinnae care ’bout youse lot doon Sooth annyweh..

    Ah’ll be decampin ‘ back to Bonny Scotland as soon as Alex declares Devo “Marx” then youse lot can do whit youse like and we’ll happily drown in our own oil in Loch Lomond.

    Like

  17. 32
    Gus O' Donell says:

    Nick,

    Er .. sorry ??

    ” ..those who have responsibility for these matters in the wider public sector…”

    The Civil Service IS ” the wider public sector — numpty !!

    Like

  18. 33
    NeverRed says:

    How about an e-petition to immediately sack all these full time Pilgrim troughers and get trade unions to pay for non work union time of the part time Pilgrim troughers. How about setting one up Guido? Join forces with The Mail, The Star, The Sun and every other newspaper that will support it.
    Let’s get 1 million signatures.

    Like

    • 44
      Really? says:

      Changing their contract of employment so that trade union must provide all funding for anyone caught by the definition of ‘Pilgrim’ ought to do it. After all, changing the law retrospectively for Barclays must have set a useful precedent for bold legislation.

      Like

  19. 40
    Anonymous says:

    Scrap the political flunkies known as political assistants – employed by many political parties in local authorities up and down the country. Nothing more than tax payer funded political workers. Scrap these parasites.

    Like

  20. 45
    Bank of UK taxpayer says:

    It’s a long time since the Pilgrim story broke. The reality is that today Jane Pilgrim is still paid to work as a nurse but engages in political campaigning for Unison three days a week. She’s laughing all the way to her canal boat…

    Like

  21. 46
    robbie says:

    and why do public bodies deliberately under-report the number of Pilgrims they are funding out of the paybill?

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

Hunt Told Off By Former Head | TES
Scrap Tax on Family Flights | ConHome
Has May Declared War on Downing Street? | James Kirkup
The Nasty Left | Dan Hodges
Men Flock to UKIP | Andrew Cadman
London-Britain Divide | Alex Wickham
Pickles Puts Prezza’s Surplus Stationary to Use | Speccie
How Capitalists Can Win the Argument | CapX
Theresa May, or Maybe Not | Spectator Life
YouGov: Working Class Prefers UKIP to Labour | Times
Sainsbury’s Disowns Left-Wing Blogger | Mail


Find out more about PLMR AD-MS


A ‘senior Conservative party official’ passes judgement on Theresa May:

“She is boring. A technocrat. She is Philip Hammond with a fanny. Not interesting, but rendered interesting by circumstance. And that circumstance is that she is a woman. And in an age when the Prime Minister gets it in the neck for refusing to wear a fucking T-shirt that says he is a feminist, that is a rocket boost right underneath you.”



Left on Left says:

The lefties are attacking because the panellist is a millionaire and lives in a London home worth upwards of two million. Someone had best tell them he’s called Ed Miliband.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,608 other followers