January 24th, 2012

John Kampfner tells Leveson that with the Lobby…

“…the interdependency is most invidious and obvious. Some lobby correspondents have become stenographers to power. When a minister or spokesman telephones, they take it down and reproduce. The more faithful the end product is to the caller’s intent, the more likely the journalist will receive a story in the future. All sides get what they want. The label “exclusive” is fair, technically, in that nobody else has the story, but these are not scoops in the sense that the term was originally intended. This is not intrepid reporting or digging, but services rendered in return for access.”


8 Comments

  1. 1
    Andrew Efiong says:

    And we know exactly who he means.

    Like

  2. 2
    Well? says:

    so its a crock of shit then (lobby system).

    Like

  3. 3
    E says:

    This post is of interest only to those that exist within the bubble.

    Like

    • 4
      Anonymous says:

      This post is of interest to anyone who cares about the manufacturing of ‘news’ and the descent of our media from gutter to sewer.

      Like

      • 6
        Hugh Janus says:

        Very true Anon. And Peter Oborne makes the same point as Kampfner in his book ‘The Rise of Political Lying’. A very good, if somewhat alarming read in my view. The lobby system works against the national interest and should be banned. Problem is – the media and our sick political class both ‘benefit’ from this cosy arrangement, because it provides a mutual back-scratching service, so it isn’t going to happen, is it?

        Like

  4. 5
    Tessa Tickles says:

    Alternatively, ‘journalists’ can just copy and paste Twitter, like they do at the Telegraph.

    Like

  5. 7
    Terrible But True says:

    ‘they take it down and reproduce. The more faithful the end product is to the caller’s intent, the more likely the journalist will receive a story in the future.’

    And you get catapulted to Political Editor during the duration of the regime most faithfully ‘reported’ upon, before you can say ‘uniquely funded’.

    Like

  6. 8
    Harriets Pants says:

    You can bet your life none of this kind of journalism would have anything to fear from ” regulation”.

    Like


Seen Elsewhere

What Will Happen if Scots Leave? | David Aaronovitch
Why Are Radicals Like Carswell Leaving Tories? | BBC
Danczuk: Rotherham Abuse Imported From Pakistan | Telegraph
Ashya King Case Shows How Authorities Get it Wrong | ConHome
The Carswell Show | Jon Craig
Cops Seized Journalist’s Phone to Out Whistleblower | Press Gazette
Chuka’s £2,500 Tax Avoidance Donation | Times
Another BBC Stitch Up? | David Keighley
Divided, Pessimistic Tories Expect Defeat | Alex Wickham
Labour Suspends Rotherham Council Members | Sky
PM Used Terror Crisis to Deflect From Carswell | Rachel Sylvester


VOTER-RECALL
Get the book Find out more about PLMR


George Osborne rejects the Ice Bucket Challenge from Ed Balls:

“I’d rather pay the money to charity and pour cold water on his policies.”



Owen Jones says:

We also need Zil lanes.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,441 other followers