Hemming Names Giggs In Parliament
It was the “Sun Wot Lost It” in court earlier, but LibDem MP John Hemming has just blown Ryan “CTB” Gigg’s privacy injunction out of the water.
Great PR for Schillings, tomorrow their client will be plastered across the front pages of every single national newspaper. Form an orderly queue for Schillings services celebs, they can do for you what they did for Giggs…
UPDATE: Full legal judgement originally made by Mr Justice Eady after hearings on the 14 & 20 April 2011 can be found here.
UPDATE II: In all its technicolor glory:
When is the Sex Tape being released?
Also named Giles Coren as the Journo in the shit.
BBC fearties are still frit to report Ryan Gigg’s name…
Sky to give them credit are not Frit.
Giggs is a first class dipstick, shouldve kepf stum. More money than sense. Overpaid twat!
Giggsy??? Really???? well, i never expected that!
Why am I not in the least surprised to see the name of that oily sh-ite bag C-liff-ord mentioned in the judgement? He really is an obnoxious smug slimy slug second onlt to Vaz-eline in that respect.
Giggs just named on Classic FM news, which is provided by Sky?
That Sunday Herald article in full. Illegal to view if you live in England or Wales.
http://tinyurl.com/3emtbsb
Mail, Mirror and Guardian all naming him on-line, but the Independent is proving once again to be not very,er… independent.
you’re not seek-uh-rut
you’re not seek-uh-rut
you’re not secret anymore
you’re not seek-uh-ruh-ut any more
Why, with a wife like he has and two lovely children, would he feel the need to “play away” – what an absolute plonker.
um, have you seen a photograph of the “plonker” ?
He’s just greedy and stupid. I don’t get it either. His wife is lovely. What a total prat.
BBC have taken bravery pill
Better late than never.
Though respect to Sky for reporting it instantly.
Their cocaine shipment must have arrived late.
Radio 5 Live have just named Giggs,Sun and Guardian Newspapers
also name him.Game on
It is a storm in a D cup.
Mail has put together a cracking front page for tomorrow.
Wonbder how many shillings Giggs wasted on this total farce?
£45 plus VAT. All the rest went to the starving lawyers.
big question is will alex fergusion take risk of playing giggs in european final
when his mind has been on injunctions and afairs.
whot if they loose (man u) with gigs – alex will look an olde fool
i think giggs will be on the bench at best – and may be brought on ….
who gives a fuck about manchester united and that shitarse ferguson
Blaaaaahahaha at Bercow! Couldn’t have looked more bug-eyed if someone had poked a non-doctor up his rosebud.
I thought Bercow handled that extremely well, actually. Words I never thought I would write.
It was quite right that Giggs was named in the House because his injunction had become a farce and the judiciary were getting above themselves.
Parliament was probably giving the Judges one last chance to see the error of their judgements this afternoon with The Sun’s High Court case and for the situation to be resolved without them losing too much face. Since that didn’t happen, it was surely inevitable that Giggs’ name would crop up at the emergency session. I doubt Bercow was surprised at all.
But by naming Giles Coren, Hemming effectively broke two footballers injunctions at once as Coren is being legally threatened by “TSE” and not CTB / Giggs. That was perhaps what Bercow was upset about and he correctly stepped in. However, Hemming is certainly no fool and he wishes see if he can protect a journalist from an unfair but legally correct prison sentence.
Although MPs can speak under Parliamentary Privilege, it would lead to a total farce and war between Parliament and the Judiciary if they openly flout EVERY injunction, particularly those that may prejudice a criminal trial.
Likewise, journalists should not be imprisoned for writing the truth.
Don’t forget, it is all to do with “points of principle” and at least these points and ground rules are being debated on a comparatively minor case and not something far, far more serious.
Westminster is the parliament for the UK and as the injunction was not relevant to Scotland …. ?
On a point of principle, it cannot be right that Giggs was allowed to buy his anonymity in the courts, while simultaneously releasing the name of his former mistress and accusing her of alleged blackmail.
The judges this afternoon quoted his harrassment as a reason not to lift the injunction. What about the harrassment she has suffered purely because of the actions taken by Giggs?
Is that Giggsy sitting next to Dominic Grieve?
You’ve missed out an ‘h’.
Bercow really living up to his surname. Berk-oh! I am really starting to dislike the speaker.
Well done to Hemming, he has put an end to this ridiculous pantomime. It is not technology that is out of control but judges who are out of touch.
Your enemy’s enemy is not necessarily your friend. Much as Giggsy will come to regret this (or the advice of his legal fee earners, sorry advisers), Hemmong is a self important, self publicising pratt.
I was on the M42 near Brum a few years back and was overtaken by a people carrier (at speed), with Hemmings name, face and and telephone no plastered all over it. On the windows, If I recall, were loads of posters about children’s issues. Hemming reminds me of the expression, ‘Empty vessels make the most noise,’ Evidenced by his cretinous appearance on Five Live this evening. Really cringworthy. Surely we can find better MPs than this.
So there you have it. The cream of Britain’s political, legal and cultural life. Giggsy, Hemming, Shillings, Burcow, did someone say Clifford? Imogen (Does my bum look big in this? Yes, very) Thomas.
God save us.
So how does Ryan Joseph Wilson or Ryan Joseph Giggs OBE become CTB?
CTB=C*unt Twat Bastard ?
Take the third letter of his cat’s name, the fifth letter of his favourite Pizza, and the third letter of his aunt’s neighbour’s sister’s road.
CTB
There you have it.
random case generator in the solicitor…
Hence Ms X, Mr Y so often….
Cocky Taffy Bighead?
Can’t Trust Barristers
cretinous thick bastard
can’t tackle bints
clueless taffy bastard
calamitous todger burying
Can’t tackle Barcelona.
Hunt Twat Beard
Hunt Twat Beard
Cut-Throat Bitch?
Clueless Taff Boyo
Cyan Tosser Biggs?
(would have worked if he played for Chelski, but I think it’s just Eady’s little tin of alphabetti sphagetti acting up again)
Wasn’t it touching to see Rooney and Ferdinand playing happy families with Giggs when they all brought their kids on the pitch.
Thanks goodness someone is finally taking the heat off me. Can we agree to call this type of injunction a ‘Giggs injunction’? I don’t see why I have to be the only famous person with something names after me.
Barbs
This is known in polite circles as “The wealthy fornicator”s injunction”. The reasons are quite clear. Only the very wealthy can afford them and they are granted exclusively to those who have been a little careless in their choice of fornicating partners.
The footballer-cum-model’s sex-tape will be released as, “Saving Ryan’s Privates.”
With a sequel called Shaving Ryans Privates . . . .
Ooooo Errrrrrr !!
Why is it that Lib Dems, who would be the first to scream blue murder if the Tories tried to repeal the ‘Yuman Rites’ legislation, are the ones out there flouting the law they supported in the first place? If they would grow some fuckin’ balls maybe they would see what a disastrous piece of legislation both they and Labour have foisted upon us.
If you bother to read the legislation, you will see that it is the judges’ interpretation of the law that is at fault in this case, not the law itself.
Can’t speak for other cases, such as the Iraqi who killed a 12 year old by reckless driving while not in possession of insurance or a licence, but it seems clear that Article 8 has been given much higher priority by the judiciary than was ever intended by Parliament.
Yes – it’s a bad law, but in cases such as this it is clear that the judiciary has far overstepped the bounds of reason and need to be slapped down.
Not correct Jack Straw gleefully predicted this would happen when the legislation was passed. If some LibDems are not happy they should never have voted for the bag of shite legislation in the first place. They disgust me. They are fighting for the right to expose Ryan Giggs’ shagging habits but are perfectly happy to support the non extradition of terrorists or non separation of a 21 year failed asylum seeking killer from his girlfriend.
Does Gareth Barry have a small part in the video?
Keep it under your Tugendhat.
The “other one” with Joe Cole in ???
At last a useful Lib DEm.
Well done.
And it was a Liberal Lord last week
I’m deeply mortified by the turn of events. Sorry must go an count the Welsh One’s money.
….as there may be a shortage of clients in the future.
Not here there won’t be.
Won’t he get a rebate at all?
What a complete mess – interesting choice for editors this pm.
Parliament , the only place of free speech yet they use that free speech to curtail taxpayers free speech.
Funny old world init.
Contempt of Court ?
I have nothing but contempt for our Courts!
On a very serious note, reading Eady’s judgement it seems that the judiciary is taking a very strange interpretation of section 12 of the HRA, which clearly gives primacy to Article 10 freedom of expression rights over Article 8 privacy rights.
He claims that ‘Strasbourg jurisprudence’ is mandated by the Act, and then justifies his treatment of rights under the two articles as equal by reference to a Council of Europe resolution (and a Law Lords decision which in itself flatly contradicts section 12). The last time I looked, the CoE was a political body rather than a court.
It seems to me that the judiciary is calling contempt down on itself by following this path.
Time to rid ourselves of these fools and get some common sense people in the judiciary – preferably non-lawyers who can cut through the bullshit.
Attention is drawn to the Blair created Soviet monstrosity known as The Supreme Court.
+1
Superinjunctions? It’s Health and Safety gone mad if you ask me!
Just reading the first few paragraphs of the Eady bullshit is enough to establish that it is deeply sexist and chauvinistic. Why is the sisterhood not up in arms about this? You can never find a femnazi when you need one.
Brief for burglar is challenging the sentence of xxx months in prison as he says by sending him to prison the court is not recognising the right to family life of the burglar. I kid you not.
When someone breaks into your home during the hours of darkness & steals your property (i.e.burglary), doesn’t that not recognise your right to family life?
Sky News names footballer …Mr Justice Eady re-convening court to re-assess lifting injunction
Sky news showing footage of Ryan Giggs, what’s happened has he been transferred, got injured, won the golden boot or something ?
He’s shagged out from playing away from home. LOL
He had it coming.
And when Eady J reconvenes the court he will still be out to lunch.
What chance, when he does reconvene, that he is still purple with apoplexy?
He ought to go to Boots and get some ointment for that.
What odds this clown Justice Eady issuing a summons against Hemming?
Love to see that: parliamentary privilege trumps the lot I’m afraid, and Hansard are obliged to publish proceedings in parliament.
Quite right. Not even Justice Eady can censor that which is said in Parliament. Nor that dwarf speaker.
All well and good saying that but if the state storm-troopers arrive you just know that Bercow would be showing them to Hemming’s office without question.
If he read this blog he would know that
Re-convening court?
Eh? Who the f**k is paying for all this?!
Not to announce his resignation, then.
I just felt it in my bones, that Rod Windy Miller bloke simply does not look trustworthy.
Stubble on the more..ahem.. mature bloke
not a good look. Remember Charles Clarke.
I can remember a picture of Clarke when he was president of the NUS. He looked a right Huhne then and he still looks a right Huhne.
I think he should ask for a refund! Serves him right for trying to cover it up.
It was not the deeds that did for Nixon, it was the cover-up and I think the same applies here.
If a name was named, presumably under Parliamentary Privilege, are the newspapers now allowed to report it, or simply report that Parliamentary Privilege was used to name a name, without then repeating the name?
Depends how freeble they are feeing. No-one will be going to prison over this. They are full. Fatty Clarke says so.
No Mr Schilling you can’t have refund.
Some sophist lawyer on B B C news who specialises in “reputation management”. What that means is bad reputation cover ups and hiding the truth . Utterly Disgraceful.
Chop off ‘is knob the knob !
I had no idea
I am shocked and stunned….. Mr Giggs?? I always thought him to be a good upstanding faithful family man !!
No. That’s me.
The news is full of Ryan and Ash. Is Ash Mr Cole? I didn’t know he was from Iceland.
Good. It was absolutely ridiculous that The Sun failed today.
John Hemming is a great MP – it’s just a shame he’s a Lib Dem. But he is one of the few good guys.
Anyone know who out of the vast bank of Mr Injustices gave the ruling against the Sun and Imogen Thomas, can’t seem to find his/her name listed.
Mr Justice Eady.
He’s a wrong ‘un.
The Hon. Mr Justice Eady
The Huhne. Mr Justice Eady.
Mr Justice Eady
Felt rather weedy
When his superinjunction
Ceased to function.
However much he became stroppy
His legal mojo’d gone floppy!
Is he duty bound to return any brown envelope directlly back to his chums at the law firms.
Mr Justice Eady
Feeling rather seedy
Agreed to injunct
A judicious c’unt
Who’d shagged a bird
(not Thora Hird)
In his digs
His name?
There was an old beak called Judge Eadie
Who ruled on a matter so seedy
When Papers were banned
And gossip was fanned
And Bercow jumped out of his seatie
A pliant Lord Justice named Eady
Gave solace to rich and to greedy
When it came to the law
He had no time for the poor –
“A Schilling for me? Yes indeedy!”
+1
+2 (scans well too!)
Thanks!
Yes, well done Hemming. I thought your views on Laws were just as damning. Oh wait …..
Great MP?
Extra-marital, £200K tax-payer mortgage to cover business interest.
Great MP !
So what if he has twenty-six mistresses? He hasn’t injuncted anyone about it. He’s the Alan Clark of our age. Let’s hope he’s keeping a diary.
Oh dear what happened to Private Ryan? Probably would like to be a private person like the rest of us and not a sport celeb. Who will be next on WikiJunctions. Without injunctions nobody would give a toss about what he did in his tea half hour. Now he is big…big news for a few days and then will disappear and the next one comes out of the injunction closet and the next one, and the next one………!
he’s been a very naughty boy
Will Bob Anisworths super-injuction be talked about ?
If he has one….
John Bercow – shut up.
Typical left winger that Giggs is always screwing someelse.
Ex-cell-ent
Does Physiognomy give any indication of intellectual prowess? If so, Mr Giggs appears to be lacking in that department. But then I’m not a football liker.
link : fleet street fox —>
Rekons there are 80 of these to go.
I do hope its not one a week for … eternity.
So has Mrs Giggs wife binned him then ???
What a slimey piece of welsh shit he is !
A slimy piece of etc. on a basic £4 million plus image rights plus this plus that, much of it tax-free…….I can’t think what she sees in him.
Born in England actually, just made the mistake of playing for Wales. Pity for the English footie team I say.
Are you talking about he who cannot be talked about ?
Born in wales. Welsh parents.
He is thinking of an English footballer though not the one who allegedly tested positive for cocaine
Perhaps he needs to have his paramour of the moment sign a confidentiality agreement before the rumpy.
I hear that another soccer player does this.
Alastair Campbell’s diaries-puffing blog records: “Giggs is in the diaries too, when he came out for Labour’s plans for devolution – another reason to like him.”
Who gives a shit what Campbell has to say about anything?
He’s yesterday’s man and unless he wants to come clean and get a few things off his conscience, I for one aren’t interested.
What a knob!, Does he not know the role of parliament?
Agree completely.
@ Chuka Umunna . Are thinking you may need one of these injuctions sometime in the future? We don’t want scum, just because they have money being treated differently to others.
Larva umana
If dodgy middle-class Nigerian twats have an opinion, then it should be carefully taken with a pinch of salt and then treated with the derision it deserves.
Especially if they’re shagging Lucrezia Berger,
Chuka Umanna Rights out of the window.
Lucrezia Berger? Did he used to play for Liverpool?
fuck off chucky
I hope you tell all the voters at the next election what you think of their rights to free speech. but somehow I know you will not.
The separation of powers was breached when the judges thought – and continue to think – they can tell people not to speak to their MPs.
The judges must get back in their box, quickly. They must not usurp the authority of parliament.
+1 – the Court of Protection is perhaps the most insidious body that exists today. It appears to exist solely for the purpose of destroying families and muzzling people who know awkward truths about Social Services staff.
Christopher Booker is doing a fine job of trying to expose all this – pity he doesn’t get more airtime.
Quite right. The entire judiciary can think themselves in contempt of the people. As they will find out following regime change.
Does Chuka agree that it was a serious abuse of powers when Labour MPs tried to hide their fraudulent expenses claims behind the cloak of parliamentary privilege?
Thought not…
That tweet is so 140 words wrong
He should’ve just paid Imogen the £100,000 she wanted. None of this fuss & he’s probably spent more on legal fees.
KUDOS to John Hemmings MP. He’s a proper MP and a Champion of free speech for the masses.
Let’s not forget she is a slapper and adulteress
…with excellent tits.
what cost to the family man image for his sponsors….
We one week from his sponsors seeing major return in investment – their man gets to eurpoean cup final and bam…..
he screws with someone else behind his wifes back and trys to cover it up.
Fantastic arse too.
Are both guilty of adultery even
if she is unmarried.
Flames and damnation, be gone foul fiend an that
Fornication is a sin!
It’s also a term for brick vaulting – in the architectural sense, of course.
So an annular vault is when it is done from behind?
Mrs Giggs is a cross vault today.
Daddy, what is a surmounted vault?
I prefer corbelled vaulting – no need to use that white ‘mortar’ stuff…
That is the best part. If you are going to get into trouble anyway, why not enjoy it?
Fornication if unmarried
No both are guilty of adultery if one of the participants are married. So Imogen is an adulteress plain and simple.
Adultress? I thought she was a merely a self-pitying, talentless, egocentric, vain, deceitful, attention-seeking, wannabe-famous slapper.
With nice tits.
Burn the harlot.
Why be surprised by the BBC & its lickspittles don’t say their tax !
Giggs should have joined AC Milan, I think he would get on witht he owner of the club quite well.
Too late – he’s given all his bunga bunga to Schillings.
Soon to be rebranded as Farthings
Haha! Quality post!
now all over sky tv………………..
bbc behind the curve as normal
BBC still crapping in case the lawyers object.
If SKY have done it, then you can do it.
Its not as if you’d have to put your hand in your own pocket if you got it wrong.
Does this mean you’re not going to jail anymore Guido?
They don’t even send murders, stabbers and rapists to Pentonville any more so it would have been a bit harsh to send G for truth telling.
Forgot to say, that Rod Christie-Miller bloke just looks and sounds like a bully so hopefully there’s one hell of a lot of people laughing at his sorry arse.
Maybe not – but you try not paying your taxes ! They’ll build one specially so they can slam the door on you !
It’ll be interesting to see what Hansard says tomorrow.
I have conferred with Mr Injustice Gready and can confirm that where the law can be shown to be an arse, adjudicated over by bigger arses, well it’s a right fucking mess!
Apparently Imogen Thomas is trying to get a singing career going but it is proving difficult: she has only had one giggs so far!
Ryan Giggs never imogen-ed it would come to this…
The chav gagged on the Gig
Fuck Bercow and the sad sacks of shit jeering the guy for doing the right thing.
They are fucking scum that should be lined up and taken out one by one.
Dominic Grieve MP- WHAT A TOSSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We need more MP’s of the type of John Hemmings MP. I wish all others were like him.
+ 1
Why is it LibDem parliamentarians who are doing all the naming and shaming?
What’s happened to all those champions of liberty on the Tory right? Surely they aren’t scared of the super-rich and their expensive lawyers?!
They ARE the expensive Lawyers !
more relevantly, they’re stuffed full of arse bandits, sexual deviants and participants in “open” marriages, so are terrified of any move towards letting the little people how they spend their leisure time and our money.
Because the Tories really aren’t bothered about a dodgy footballer playing away, they are involved in sorting out the economic and social consequences of 13 years of disasterous mis-rule by labour. The limp dims, OTOH, are as usual, scrabling for any bit of cheap publicity they can get, to justify their pointless existence.
See that thing, that tiny wee thing that’s just a dot in the distance… that’s the ‘Point’.
‘they are involved in sorting out the economic and social consequences of 13 years of disasterous mis-rule by labour’
How so?
Government spending is rising, debt increasing, they are pouring vast amounts of money into the global warming fraud fund and they have pledged billions of our money, to third world dictators around the globe.
I would hate to see them being loose with the economy if this is frugal.
Oh yes and they have a shiny new war for us to pay for now too.
There are no right wingers in the Cabinet – only Dave’s Blue Labour.
They are terrified of being seen as the nasty party, so prefer to waste money we don’t have appeasing the Left and the Warmists. You know, I know and anyone who can add up knows that the ‘cuts’ are in reality just a reduction in spending increases, and that Libya was just Dave playing a game of big swinging dicks with Sarkozy – we won’t solve the problems by only just maxing out our credit cards and indulging the macho fantasies of our leaders.
On the question of ‘where are the Right?’, I’d guess that the Whips Office has been very clear that any Hemmingry by backbenchers will be inimical to future prospects…
don’t you believe it
the tories like labour before are busy feathering their own nests
We’re going to sort out the economic and social consequences of 13 years of disastrous mis-rule by labour by pissing away billions on foreign aid, Euro bailouts, eco-scams and by starting another war.
The clue is in the title ‘Liberal’
So, this was covered on BBC News? Obligation to cover Parliamentary proceedings vs the obligation to abide by an injunction? BRAIN FIZZING…OVER-LOAD…OVER-LOAD….
“BRAIN FIZZING…OVER-LOAD…OVER-LOAD….”….
Causing Marr’s ears to drop off in shame! Hopefully!
Marr can’t risk gaol, you know what happens to the pretty ones inside don’t you?
surely that means he would be as safe as houses
BBC News seem to be not naming him still. Funny how they were happy to name Fredder Shredder after he was named in Parliament.
Are they really that scared now because the judicial committee was fear mongering about the legality of media reporting on injunction-breaking parliamentary proceedings?
Well the Murdoch empire’s involved and since the breach of the injunction directly benefits them it’s not unnatural that the lefty scum in the BBc are fizzing with rage.
They’re still not naming him on the BBC – just saying that Hemming has named him. Bunch of chicken shits.
Probably waiting for the OK to go ahead from Labour HQ.
We are out to lunch consulting our lawyers. Nice lunch, by the way. Thanks to all you licence payers out there !!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13503847
Reporting on the Commons isn’t illegal is it?
Only when it exposes MPs fiddling their expenses.
Old news Guido tell us about the one concerning Gareth Barry
Gareth Barry…………. are you saying that Gareth Barry has a Super injunction out? The Gareth Barry………. well I never, once again I am shocked and stunned !
Are you mad? It’s to do with Gareth Barry and Kimberly West. No idea why though.
He never ever scores away from home, or even at Eastlands.
Who the fuckety fuck is Kimberley West?
I’d never heard of Imogen Thomas before the Giggs thing, either.
Gareth Barry’s once more been named in the England squad – has he been shagging Capello as well? I wouldn’t pick him for a pub team, the useless c’unt.
Never heard of Gareth Barry or Kimberley West.
But injunctions just make me curious…
“On 22 May 2011, it was reported that the solicitors Schillings, acting on behalf of a client, requested that a British journalist and TV star be referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve for contempt of court, after allegedly breaching a privacy injunction on the social media website Twitter.[33] On 23 May 2011, MP John Hemming spoke in the House of Commons and used parliamentary privilege to identify Giles Coren as the journalist involved.[34]. Coren had made jokes on his Twitter web feed about Barry, superinjunctions and Ryan Giggs on 13 and 14 May 2011.”
Source; wikipedia
It is completely obvious that Ryan Giggs only took out this injunction because he wanted free publicity to help Imogen’s singing career.
The court’s shouldn’t allow themselves to be manipulated like this.
Does this mean that Giggs’ law suite againts Twitter is also a waste of money?
Yep, Twitter is based in the USA so is covered by the first admendment.
Any anyway there is a legitimate public interest in knowing that Eady is not a very good judge.
+10^10^10 – nail on head.
Rem acu tetigisti…
Right, that’s ‘Giggsy’ outed. Anyone know who else is hiding behind the Judges’ skirts? Please tell if you know, or at least gizza clue. Thanks!
Try typing gareth into Google… least that’s what Giles Coren might advise…
Thanks Ivor & Arthur!
Gareth Barry
What is it about Manchester?
obvious mate – it stinks
Must admit to being a tad confused now, as the Telegraph site is citing Giles Coren (having been mentioned in the HoC) as having outed Giggs rather than the eejit on the front page of the Scottish paper. Who I thought was the Gareth Barry I’d never heard of….
I was confused too – apparently Coren outed Barry, and it was Piers Moron who was twittering about Giggs (some lame comment about taking the C-cups on the bus).
The two incidents were reported almost simultaneously, with the intentional misdirection of describing Coren as a journalist, Had me fooled – I thought he was just a pretentious c’unt that went to restaurants and scribbled ‘humourous’ reviews.
His sister’s still well shaggable, though.
You’d go all in, then…
she’s worth 45 minutes each way, then hopefully extra time and a replay
That’s a lot of changing ends
I’d love to help you, but I’m a bit tied up at the moment – and if anyone says anything about my recent retreat from public life they’re heading for a spanking.
See the link DO NOT READ THIS at top by Fleet Street Fox (Nobody named though).
As almost everyone in the country knew his identity by searching for it on the internet and therefore being in contempt of court by carrying out such a search – we are all going to prison.
As there are not enough prison places currently available, England itself is to be turned into a de facto prison with immediate effect.
Anyone who does not know what the footballer has been up to and wishes to leave, should do so now.
Perhaps one of them will now name the MP(s) with super injunctions.
Or is that not the way it works?
Mike Handcock and ZAc Goldsmith, Bob anisworth is also a clinet of shillings(so rumour has it)
Bob “Syrup” Ainsworth. Hair today gone tomorrow. LOL
so is Jonathan Ross, interesting
Max Clifford Blaming Giggs of both putting Imogen Thomas’s name into the press and giving her no right of reply with the injunction. She has been badly served by the law.
And Max Clifford is laughing all the way to the bank, as usual.
So are Schillings.
Clifford does have a point though. Giggs’s legal team put Imogen’s name into the public domain and the injunction took away her right of reply and at the same time keeping his name secret. Why is there one law for Giggs and a different law for Imogen?
Not quite true – Imogen’s name was already in the public domain as having shagged ‘a premier league footballer’ – a direct leak from Clifford to the Sun on her behalf. Giggs was not named in the original story, as the Sun agreed with his solicitor not to do so for a day or two. Hence Giggs going for the injunction.
I smell a bit of a setup here – maybe the Dirty Digger wanted all this to come to a head?
Doesn’t alter the fact that Eady’s a horses arse, though…
And she was accused of being a blackmailer.
She should sue Giggs.
How much is that Hunt Clifford getting for promoting Ms Silicone Valley Girl?
I give to charity you know, and you mustn’t be hard on me because my wife died of can cer.
and you have a disabled daughter who the evil Tories would not put a ramp on your house for so you arranged stories for Liebour to be elected but forgot about the ramp for 13 years of Bliar-Brown
Does anyone know the name of a Premiership footballer who hasn’t been caught with his pants down?
Yes , Jack collinson but he is gay.
…..or indeed any who exercise ball control with a reasonable degree of skill.
like…..??
………….. er ……………..
On me head son…..
Yes, but they all end in ‘ez’, for some reason – Tevez, Suarez…
Horlicks. Oh, sorry, wrong room.
Well, I would have preferred it had the tabloids held back until after the CL final (and this is typical of the ‘build ‘em up, knock ‘em down’ mentality prevalent among tabloid twats), but I suppose that the principle is more important than the man.
I look forward to the same MP naming in due course his shagger colleague who disgraced the HoP. Unless this was just a bit of grandstanding against an easy target, of course …
you know what andy, you’re a wanker
Of course it was grandstanding against an easy target.
If he blasts Laws et al from his own benches I’ll have respect for him.
In legal terms this is what has happened:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Jury_nullification
A jury of 100,000+ has kicked the judges into touch.
Bercow was wrong
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/6
Acts of public authorities
(1)It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.
but does not include either House of Parliament or a person exercising functions in connection with proceedings in Parliament.
bercow is always wrong
How can Bercow remain in his job when he doesn’t actually understand what his job entails?
He got Sally to suck off the entire House of Commons. She was a bit of a mess after a 600 guy cream pie, but after they hosed her down she was as good as new.
You’ve got to cry, where do we get supercillious huhnes like Dominic Grieve from!
‘It is our duty as parliamentarians to uphold the rule of law”
….and surely to change the law when it is a complete and utter arse and like Mr Hemming says, does not have the consent of the public.
…So mr slimy, unctious, supercillious Grieve stick it up your arse!
Twats like him would have said the same about slavery and banning alcohol on Sundays. Thick as pigshit.
Grieve and Clark to go in a reshuffle hopefully. Useless fuckin’ huhnes.
By the look of him, they got him from a Punch and Judy show.
Breath-taking hypocrisy from little Dominic. The scale of the MPigs’ troughing, as revealed by the Telegraph, shows very clearly that parliamentarians ‘duty to uphold the rule of law’ comes second to any chance to stuff their own mouths with gold.
I want to know who Fred Goodwin was sh–ing in the broom cupboard, on the board room table, bent over backwards on his desk with his braces round his ankles. Whilst he should have been working to stop his bank from collapsing and letting all of those people losing thier homes, thier jobs, thier savings and thier pensions.
So it’s Fred The Shag Goodwin and not the Shred then?
When his knob’s up he’s nay gonna worry about his customers is he!
It wisnae me – least you’d better not say so, otherwise you’ll in trouble with Mr. Justice Cockledcarrot…
RBS Employee Of The Day:
http://tinyurl.com/3qcrok6
Now that’s a gobbling mouth.
No wonder Fred took his eye off the ball – it was probably in her mouth at the time
Ooooh! You are so naughty. I never thought that, twice.
She could suck an orange through a hose pipe as some of her staff commented
Well he certainly fucked his customers and shareholders.
H.R.
Wonder if it was the person responsible for handing him such a tidy sum in pay-off and pension after the bank collapsed?
Surely there is public interest in knowing these facts- especially as we all paid for it?
I’ve seen her name mentioned on the internet.
It’s not hard to find.
The person responsible for Fred’s severance package was (ultimately) either Brown or Mangledbum.
They tried to pin it on ‘Lord’ Myners (another placeman who has no rightful place in the Upper House), who appears to have no redeeming features whatsoever.
I suppose Fred might have been shagging one of the first two…
Brown and Goodwin were partners in crime going round the country (when Brown was Chancellor) to ‘business man/woman of the year’ dinners in various cities. Goodwin would tout for their accoiunts and Brown for political donations. In Portsmouth the dinner was set up by Hancock and the two ‘Businessmen of the year’ were both big time drug dealers/ property developers.
Ed Reallybland Surpassed himself this morning on 5 live
He became the first Labour “political ventriloquist” to appear on radio
It sounded like he was talking through his nose
Whilst actually talking through his arse !
there we go:
Telegraph’s done it!
Days too late, but they may as well pretend to be part of a free press.
BBC PM program just named he who must not be named.
So, Mr Justice Eady has already buggered off for the day from the High Court, and the Sun lawyers are now hoping to go before a different judge now Giggs has been named in parliament.
Hopefully they’ll be able to, and with the dick Eady out of the way they may well succeed.
Foregone conclusion…look on the net…nobody is waiting for the Courts it seems
Sky;BBC;The Sun;The Mirror;The Mail’The Guardian all naming the footballer
Yeah, but they’re naming him as the man accused in parliament as being the footballer. Not actually being the footballer. Small point, but an important one.
A lawyers spot.
Would that Mr Justice Eady would spend a bit more time with his family.
Fuck off. We don’t want him. He’ll have to go into a home.
He might end up in prison if the police investigate him for corruption.
I’ll pay £100 to any MP who stands up in the house and refers to Hugh Bonneville paying a hooker £195 to stick a dildo up his jacksie.
£195? Did he get a 2.5% discount or something? Did she give Nectar points?
I gave her £200 in twenties and waited for her to give me my £5 change.
Did I see him on’t tellie last night
looking a trifle uncomfortable.
I can’t be arsed with all this as I’m always in arrears.
BBC R4 has just broadcast from Commons! Hemmings justifies. Well done.
Sadiq Khan is currently talking crap on BBC Parliament. What a shitty little weasel he is. His type can never answer a question. He is a totally useless pile of spew.
But then we all knew that. Incidentally, did we ever find out what capacity he does his prison visits in these days?
Mule.
Ha Ha ha
Clifford is saying all Imogen did was warn Giggs that the Sun had been asking questions and he should be careful.
Straight away Giggs got an injunction naming her of having an affair but keeping his name secret. she has been badly served by the law
So Max Clifford is whiter than white. I think not.
Money, money, money in a rich man’s world.
Oily smarmy arrogant weasel money-grabbing self-important trougher.
Word is the recovened hearing is before Tugendhat J., not Eady J. …
Another ignorant tosser who can’t read section 12 of the HRA as it is clearly meant.
Still, Section 12.4.a.i now surely applies, and 12.4.b is utterly redundant. Even Leopardskin Pillboxhat should be able to see that…
+1. Agreed. If not, we might as well give up completely.
Update – I give up.
Me too – I really cannot see how someone so willfully stupid ever became a judge.
Presumably he had friends in the Labour Party.
See below: Tugendhadt upholds order…
The BBC voice piece of Labour.
cod piece more like
ring piece, more like
With shadow ministers like Sadiq Khan labour will never win an election again. My farts make more sense than he does.
Luvvies fornicating is hardly news.
No but celebrities, dodgy businessmen and bent politicians taking out injunctions IS news and awakens the curiosity in us all.
“Hemming names Giggs in Parliament”
July 1st – Wemberly arena
july 2nd -O2 arena
July 4th- Old Trafford
July 6th- The old Playhouse.
Gordon Brown’s “I saved the world” world tour.
June – Kirkcaldy Town hall
July – Washington {Alaska} – The Ice hole bar’s and Fries
Aug – Tripoli – The grand Mummar Palace of Dreams {subject to cancellation}
Sept – Amsterdam – The Anne Frank attic
More dates to be announced. Book now to avoid disappointment!
NOTE
{Opinions may vary. Does not mean purchase will not disappoint.}
LOL
I’m still the biggest ashcloud!
It is really rather difficult to work out of all this publicity will be good or bad for the superinjunction market. I think we should proceed upon the basis that evn if they get aired in parlt. or the intnt. the consumer will still be happy to be bled – which is to say we must proceed as we are pro tem. After all , the judges are quite tame in this respect.
I’d like someone to put a super injunction up my bot bot.
I’ll do it for £195.
Me too!
Cant afford a super injuction, How about a shotgun?
Super Athletico Injunction vs Real Embarrasi.
GK -Peter Shilton
Def – Ashley Cole
def – Stan Collymore
def – John Terry
def – Gareth Barry
Mid – George Best
Mid – Ryan Giggs
Mid – Garry Flitcroft
FC – Frank Worthington
FC – Dwight Yorke
ST – Wayne Rooney
Sub – Wayne Bridge
Sub – Mark Bosnich
Sub – Ally McCoist
+1
Good to see the Lib Dems getting their priorities right. Not a word about Laws Huhne or Lembit, but Giggsy, yeah lets nail ‘im. He hasn’t stolen £56,000 from us but hey, playing away and misguided judgement.
You courageous c unts.
Just caught a bit of John Hemming on the BBC, he could go far as long as he hasnt got any skeletons or kids(Buried) in the closet.
Good to see you posting away despite the negativity re you from some a wipes over the last few days.
I can’t find it in my heart to find positivity in any Lib Dem when they remain so silent about the corruption in their ranks.
Speak up about this please Hemming.
Kid with his assistant, LD councillor, just after 2005 election but his wife, with whom he has three kids, stood by him saying it was only about the 26th time he had played away. See Wiki
Nuff said.
It’s not about affairs. They don’t actually matter. It’s lying about them that matters, and trying to enforce your lies through the courts. If anything, it makes it better that it is a notorious philanderer who has revealed Giggs’s identity.
Hypocrisy more like.
I’m going to Nokia Christine Lagarde.
“Thtay inthide everyone. Lord Athcloud ith back.”
“Oh yeth. Nearly forgot. Thoo far, thoo fast, Tory-led coalition.”
Me and Yvette have made our own sex video. On sale to the highest bidder. In it I dwess up as Gowdon, and Yvette is in a nuwse’s unifowm.
Up the nurses!
So the Goering and Eva thing has palled at last, Ed?
It’s cyanide time, maybe?
Woof! Woof
Translated “oh shit not the fucking pill again”
Well that could explain the Nokia-shaped dent in her face.
RBS has become a byword for all that is wrong with the UK banking industry. Greedy, fat cat bankers, epitomised by Sir Fred Goodwin, who have taken our money and gambled it recklessly. And when things went wrong they were bailed out by the taxpayer.
Against such a backdrop, it would it would be a surprise if the person in charge of recruitment for this much-maligned bank didn’t have a sense that the cards were unfairly stacked against them.
However, as Susan Bor, RBS’s director of group resourcing, looks out across the City skyline from the 11th floor of the bank’s Bishopsgate offices, she is clearly relishing the task.
Bor admits that the past 18 months have been painful. “But you can only feel that for so long,” she says. “We are not down. We don’t think ’we don’t have bags to offer people’,” she adds.
http://www.recruiter.co.uk/susan-bor/1004341.article
Why are any members of the RBS management who were at the bank during it’s collapse, still there?
Surely they are all tarnished by the failures of the past and don’t instill any confidence in the future success of the company.
Before O’Neals and Fuld’s banks went under they fired competent people and promoted the incompetent
“It’s a difficult trick to pull off in any organisation…”
I’ve heard too much white powder can cause those problems
“I never knew O’Bama was Oirish”
Funnily enough, last time I was in Tokyo, I was discussing Obama’s Irish roots with His Imperial Majesty the Emperor, or ‘Paddy’ as he prefers to be known in private.
It’s getting late. Horlicks anyone? Ah! Nicola, here you go.
Well, there’s a pleasant surprise….”it’s our duty to uphold the law”, guess there’s a first time for everything then. This shower in the Commons and the Lords act as if the Law doesn’t relate to them just us the poor sod taxpayers!
Parliament and the judiciary and the EU need to go and lock themselves away for about 5 years, I’m sure we’d manage very well without the vast majority of the overpaid, underworked shower!
Dear Guido
Can you please not confuse me with that welsh footballer all over the news.
Brain Giggs
Manchester
Are you the bloke who’s been seeing the girl from Boots. Imogen Tubbs?
No, you see i am not into women.
Brian Giggs
Manchester
What’s the bet that the judges will jail any more piggy MPs that pass their way for MUCH longer times, now that they MPs have kicked the judges up the backside?
What about Dunblane? Is there a super-injunction about that?
Shh. There was no high level Scottish paedo ring. There’s nothing to see here. Well, not for 100 years anyway.
Nope – just a ban on releasing any of the papers.
Equally wrong, especially as the incident was used as a justification for banning handgun ownership rather than tackling pædophilia in public life…
Scottish public life?
I don’t think Hadrian’s wall is any barrier to that sort of thing…
Ha Ha
BBC and SKy showing Barry O` bummer but Fox News are not showing the “Anonited ones” speech in irish-land
Is it the right time for him to sue Schillings (didn’t they used to make hats?) for fucking about with his money?
I imagine the Sunday papers have already ordered double paper and ink supplies, for next week, to report what is already on the net now.
And a full week before they go on sale, Giggs bit on the side is going to be wealthy by monday week.
Which was Max’s plan because he has a cut.
Hey its not my money so i dont care
Business as usual then.
My lawyers told me it was a good idea to write them a humongous cheque.
‘It was Sir Alex’s fault. He told me at my age I should just concentrate on filling the hole’.
Madness!
Tugendhadt J. rules after reconvened hearing that injunction protecting Giggsy remains in place.
And we all know that Fred the Shed was Bor-ing.
Pillbox hat has just upheld the injunction – is he determined to make the whole legal system look as much of an ass as he is?
What an utter pillock that man is – a contemptible buffoon if ever there was one.
Be ye whomsoever ye may be, the law is above you. Reality has nothing to do with it, never has, never will. Why do you think they dress up like Widow Twankey for fuck’s sake?
So they can have a J Arthur whilst sentencing.
But it is already on record (Hansard and you tube) .
It’s worse than the 1960s Lady Chatterley trial.
Is Twitter something that you would even wish your wife or your servants to read?
Not if your name is Ryan Giggs, it’s not!!!!!
A good day to bury bad news
Where’s that time machine?
You need a day in the past you idiot.
Maenwhile……
Bradford gets UK’s first Muslim woman lord mayor
She’ll lool reat grand wi’ mayoral chain over er Burka.
As she is given a OBL style send off.
Allah B. Praised. Good to know that Enoch was talking shite all those years back.
Rivers of Blood =7/7 Bombings !
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad” – he said – and what is madder than the opendoor policy of entry to this country by the scum of the world that Labour has forced on the country for the past 13 years.
She doesn’t look too frightening.
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/resources/images/581838/?type=display
Is that Munter Omar ?
Oh dear could’nt she wear a Veal
So Bradford have a mayor. This is news?
I think we need New Judges… or at least a few more Welsh ones, …Is there some reason why they are called Shillings ??
Ferguson told me i needed to do more dribbling in the box !
Well you always shoot too soon !
Have you been dribbling in her box?
Even i’m not allowed to tell you !
Giggs’s Lawyers are back in the high court now !
trying to secure an injunction to prevent the press from contacting him !
What you need to do you dopey twat is get one to stop your wife questioning you !
Sunday Night: review of the Papers on BBC news channel. Reviewer whose name I didn’t catch – referred to “professionally trained journalists”…..hahahahaha….. as opposed to the Blogosphere and all us lot the great unwashed. I would dearly love to know who this guy is. He is in dire need of a bloody good talking to / massive exposure for being:
1) a total Hunt
2) a pompous self regarding prat
3) an odious little creep
Anybody else see/hear this?
I saw it Codswallop and thought as you ” where did they get that tosser, thicker than thick tosser, from?”
BBC journalists are rarely professional nowadays.
They’re sadly predictably biased and I wouldn’t believe them if they told me the time.
Gareth Barry. What about Gareth Barry. Why isn’t anyone talking about Gareth Barry.
dont you mean Bareth Garry ?
Whats he been up to then ?
The usual.
All I know is this week’s Private Eye will be full of Eady and Tugendhat.
Step forward Hislop, brave and steadfast warrior of truth!
Or shit stirring little shite !
As well as being on the BBC payroll, Hislop’s a true believer in the man made global warming fraud.
Leave Hislop alone.
He’s done a good job at Private Eye over the years.
Giggs looks like Monkey from the classic 1970s TV series in that pic…
All that dosh. thrown away…. for what
ryan,s thick as shit but his lawyers sure a’rent
Footballer sleeps with loose woman. I for one do not care. Is this news ?
Not really, but English courts trying to curtail free speech is.
Do you think Giggs will be voting Lib Dem?
Don’t be silly, no one will.
My name is Barry O’Bummer and today I’ll mostly be proclaiming to have shamrock green Irish blood running through my veins. Until that is I arrive in the UK when I shall dig up yet another great great great grandfather but not my original birth certificate.
To be sure to be sure.
I am the American dream, I am the anointed one, Insha’Allah!
Excellent blog from Delingpole on that very subject:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100088971/obama-oh-puh-lease/
I dont know who is the Bigger Bullshitter Paddy O’Bamah or Call me Dave
Fucked by the English, screwed by the EU, now their trying to passing off a porch monkey as an Irishman!
Whatever next I wonder?
His great great grandfather was brought to Ireland as a slave after the Holyhead ferry was blown off course to Kenya,and on arrival was forced to work in a paddy field.
Thought he came from the Mau-Mauntains of Morne?
Mr speaker seemed to be cutting across all sorts today and quickly put Hemmings in a lock. I can understand that legal law is/has become a little too complex for the lay man (which is somthing of dysfunctional golden rule in my books) , Mr Grieve being attornay general was perhaps cautious, again David Davies made an easy to understand aspect , it is of course not about footballers and I was surprised Mr Bones or for that matter Mr Cash remarks didnt break out to unamious applause so obvious is what has been lost, however it was a question and not a debate.
I was interested to know what the oath of the judicary was , my searches have led me to a blank gov page 404 not found and very complicated FOI requests .
If institutions have value such things should be clearer . I can see that some thought and consideration are needed , but what for the law of the ordinary person or for that matter its clear link to having the finances to make it more favourable to some than to others .
The judiciary is the official institution , formed by acts of parliament , it is the clarity of this relationship (and the over arching interruptions of the EU court ) that have made lawyers play the judiciary dysfunctionally and expensively divided.
In the thoughts and considerations now underway , the evidence and testemony are the only way the truth can be ascertained ,that is why I feel courts and not injunctions best serve the legal process , private cases can have an out of court cost necessity , but surely some cases once entered into such as a corporate misdoings must be concluded as effectively as possible , the law must surely act for the public in informing them of what the law has judged .
Breech of privacy in personal cases , is still a matter of attaining the truth , wether the case folds or not , embarrasment and public knowledge are personal breeches of trust , delicate human failings , but if you earn a living by offering the public a clean brand of personal conduct and your life is contray to that , why should the public be decieved by your truth concealing PR ,or for that matter your spouse or business collegs .Does the vicar who blew the church repair fund on a fornight in vegas , not deserve the same as a footballer who concealed somthing from his wife/partner , is the fall from personal conduct not the same ?
free speech has a responsible element , but in the end isnt truth somthing for judges to ascertain on the publics/laws behalf as well.
Eh?
Ironic that his lawyers have taken him for a much bigger ride than any gold-digging slapper would have.
Ahhhhh! It was Ryan Giggs . . .
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQSJMOp8m2A&w=560&h=349%5D
If I move to London and stay in LSE student digs a super injunction will hide my identity, right?
And a super injunction beats an arrest warrant from the international criminal court?
Hemming is innocent!
Solidarity with my Lib Dem brothers.
By Any Means Necessary.
Could somebody please explain the offside rule in Association Football to me?
Here’s how my wife learnt to grasp it . . .
You’re in a shoe shop, second in the queue for the till. Behind the shop assistant on the till is a pair of shoes which you have seen and which you must have.
The female shopper in front of you has seen them also and is eyeing them with desire.
Both of you have forgotten your purses.
It would be totally rude to push in front of the first woman if you had no money to pay for the shoes.
The shop assistant remains at the till waiting.
Your friend is trying on another pair of shoes at the back of the shop and sees your dilemma.
She prepares to throw her purse to you.
If she does so, you can catch the purse, then walk round the other shopper and buy the shoes.
At a pinch she could throw the purse ahead of the other shopper and, *whilst it is in flight* you could nip around the other shopper, catch the purse and buy the shoes.
Always remembering that until the purse had *actually been thrown* it would be plain wrong to be forward of the other shopper.
But if there is another friend casually leaning against the counter are they interfering with the purchase?
What a disgraceful, self-serving, self-publicising piece of parliamentry theatre Mr Hemming has felt able to deliver in full contempt of this countries judicial system. With complete disregard of a citizens privacy, their dignity and family, he has portrayed a contempt not only for the courts but ultimately for himself.
Peddling shameful, tittle-tattle, red-top, page 3 journalism in parliament diminshes it further.
Bad court rulings deserve to be treated with contempt.
It has nothing to do with the adulterous behaviour of a footballer and everything to do with the principles of free speech in a democracy.
Hear hear. The hypocritical tosser apparently plays away more than a premiership football team.
What a disgraceful, etc. piece of judicial theatre Mr Justice Eady has felt able to deliver in contempt of the intent of Parliament and of the people of this country.
With complete disregard for the meaning of Section 12 of the HRA he has attempted to remove the freedom of expression of the gutter press at the expense of the privacy of an adulterer.
His actions bring the whole judiciary into contempt.
Yeah, and if you read up on things properly, which the greater part of the unwashed here seem to be quite incapable of, some of the things he seems to have alleged were never on the cards anyway
Should’ve known when I heard he was a Lib Dem.
Hey what’s wrong with footballers and not so famous actors (Hugh Bonneville) shagging their way through wannabe WAG’s & Tom’s and then pleading for protection because their reputatations will be ruined if the public find out?
Is Gareth Barry TSE? The dirrrrty basssstard (Allegedly)
Team to play against Barcelona
1. Van Der Sa
2. O’Shea
3. Evra
4. Carrick
5. Ferdinand
6. Vidic
7. Park
8. Carrick
9. Un-named married premier league footballer
10. Rooney
11. Hernandez
John hemming is a fucking prick.
That sounds about right, somewhat restrained even
Hope Old Mother eady gets the bill from thebill from the Californi ajudicial system has ir raken ouof his pension fund that will tend him more towards deocracy them fuckers will cleab him out
Hi Guido
How does it feel to be Chief of the Barbarian Horde? Isn’t being the leader of a bunch of idiots and assorted tossers not even just a tad depressing? Or are you just another little thug with a keyboard, happy to manipulate and take advantage of a gang of prejudiced and ignorant illiterates? Bit like a tabloid editor, really
Schillings have much nastier clients than Ryan Giggs, who seems really just a bit silly.
It is consistently difficult to access Schillings letters re ARK Academies. Direct links to this material are on the 911forum under ‘War on Children’, post titled “Schillings solicitors letters; direct links”