Saturday Seven Up
The blog has been busy at the forefront of breaking news this week, leading on two front-page issues: Huhne and super-injunctions. On Monday we were the first to exclusively reveal where Vicky Pryce was on that fateful night in March 2003, pipping Michael Crick to be first to pixel. On Tuesday our poll of over 4,549 readers revealed that 96% thought Chris Huhne was lying.
Wednesday morning economic data released showed the unemployment rate falling, we suggested Ed Balls go back to the drawing board. PMQs was rowdy, Aidan Burley MP asked the PM to back Guido’s campaign against “Union Pilgrims”, the taxpayer-funded union organisers paid to agitate full-time instead of doing their frontline public sector jobs. Thursday marked Day 11 of the Huhne speeding story, the point where Alastair Campbell says the game is up.
Thursday we outed the doctor who has appeared in political adverts for Miliband, Brown, Sadiq Khan and Tony Blair. Friday was super-injunction day again, we named the billionaire who has muzzled Britain’s press and laughed at Ryan Giggs for being the fall guy for Schillings, the lawyers who more than any other firm have brought the law into disrepute. For good measure we revealed that the Shadow Chancellor’s political adviser had failed to declare his financial interests in breach of parliament’s rules.
Last week saw 97,086 visitors make 298,256 visits to view 467,784 pages. Thanks to you we’re Britain’s favourite blog, the one you love and they hate. The top stories last week in order of popularity were:
- Exclusive: Proof Vicky Pryce Was Not In Essex That Day
- The Richest Man in Britain, Lakshmi Mittal,
Has Super-Injunction Muzzling the Press - “Brazen” Huhne Losing Friends Fast
- Miliband’s Made Up Coffey Morning
- Leader Slams Huhne
- Shadow Chancellor’s Adviser Fails to Declare Financial Interests
Balls’ Bellardinelli Breaks Parliamentary Rules - Crick is On the Case…
You’re either in front of Guido, or you are behind…
See list of injunctors named here:
http://super-injunction.blogspot.com/
and spreadsheet here:
http://tinyurl.com/3k38quc
A good week, are Schillings going to come after you though?
To punish him. For telling the truth.
The internet cannot be constrained!
‘Yesterday one of the UK’s most senior judges said that modern technology is out of control. It’s not. It’s just out of his control and the control of his cronies who uphold justice and equality for anyone who can afford their fees.’
This comment was posted on another site, I agree wholeheartedly. The ability of technology to allow freedom of speech in a manner that cannot be restrained by the rich and powerful could well prove to be the salvation of nations and our planet.
By exposing the bunch of miscreants and leeches that collude with financial puppet masters and powerbrokers to undermine the very basis of our society, platforms such as o-o.com and Twitter perform a vital and critical role.
By enabling people to band together and mobilize their energy in a concerted effort, such services allow a far better coordination and more convenient method of communicating peoples’ objection than has ever existed before.
No wonder judges and other figures of the establishment are nervous. For the first time in our history they themselves can be tried in an open and incorruptible court of the public choosing. They have nowhere to hide, and no influence.
This is democracy! Not the elitist system the establishment strives to protect and protect. The revolution starts here, and they know it… I have always dreamed the internet could provide hope through communication. Now I’m seeing it.
Judges should be appointed through select committee approval like in the US. They really are starting to take the fucking piss.
Mark my words, we, the rulers of this country, are going to put a stop to this information being posted electronically on the internet. Freedom of information is a myth that we have perpetuated. Our interests are now being severely compromised by the internet and blogs like this one. It will have to stop.
Watched a cracking documentary the other day, Capitalism: A Love Story (Michael Moore). One outstanding moment was when a brave congressman, in the face of the ‘vote’ to pass $700 billion aid to the poor old banks (who had used their power to bully, threaten and intimidate the entire congress), turned around and said to the chairman, ‘Is this the United States congress or the board of directors of Goldman Sachs?’
It all sounded sadly familiar…
PS. Agree the point DtP, there should be intense vetting. Only difficulty is that those ‘vetting’ are largely as bent as those they select.
Apparently, the internet is being constrained… or at least filtered.
Here’s a link to a TED talk explaining how what you see is being decided by someone else, or more precisely an alogrithm created by someone else and working on your behalf without your consent.
Who’s surfing the web for you?
Schillings will rue the day they started this one as their reputation will be in tatters after the dust settles. Bad advice all round IMO. The interview on newsnight was a slam dunk for the media lawyer were it in court case over.
There’s an opening for the head of the IMF. Pick me, pick me says Gordon the economic terrorist.
Well they’ve had a sex pest, why not a bank robber?
BTW, anyone know what’s happened to all that bail out money? Oh, of course, we know some of it went on bonuses… and the rest?
Does my CV fit ??
Absolutely Fred, you have all the right credentials. Greedy, immoral, untrustworthy and unethical. Play your cards right and you could become PM!
Apparently, according to Brown’s mates, Dave is being unpatriotic in not supporting Brown’s bid to be head honcho at the IMF. Are his supporters allowed to be alone with sharp objects?
Who the fuck supported Cathy Ashton – even Labour gits had never heard of her. Payback time.
I’d have said Dave’s being responsible, and probably very patriotic in the long term too.
Imagine the damage the monocular moron could do to our country’s reputation as head of the IMF – is he not content with having fucked our public finances?
OT
Perhaps I’m being fick here but can any legal types answer me this: If some spotty celeb takes out a super injunction, I’m presuming that the press are told of it because they are not allowed to report the fact that the injunction exists, never mind the reason behind it. How does that work? Is there some ‘network’ at play? Which leads me to the next bit: Since I am not part of that ‘network’, if I hear the ‘story’ down the pub and publish it on a blog, if I didn’t know there was a super injunction in place, how would I know not to publish the story on a blog? Guido, how do you find out super injunctions exist – are you told officially, or from ‘sources’ in newsrooms?
Quite.
Mornin ar cat
top lawyer just been on sky news says
if you come out and say the footballer is ,then you have breached the injunction.
but if you say is the footballer ? you have not !
Hi mate! If you are not in the country, like Twitter – or myself for that matter, then the injunction, contra mundum though it may be, is irrelevant. Our good host’s site is also out of jurisdiction.
If one is using a keyboard sat on British soil to put words on a server in a far off land, where is the “crime” committed?
Thinking about the Gary Mckinnon case then I suppose they are saying he committed his crime in America even though he was still on UK soil.
In my case, they are going to be forced to open the box. They will then find out whether I am alive or dead. That, one imagines, in turn, may affect their next move.
Thought you were being a banana today, Cat?
Eady must be in some kind of superposition – between arrogance and plain madness.
C’ept in his case, he is both, even after the box is opened. Regards to your young lady…
A good question actually.
Ta, both.
As a follow up: One reporter at one paper gets hold of a story, doorsteps the celeb; celeb gets a super injunction. ‘Network’ comes into play, all the other papers, ‘official’ media in general, now know not only an injunction exists (which they must not mention to us, the great unwashed) but presumably the details, even in their barest form – particularly the names of those involved (otherwise how would they know which ‘story’ not to publish). One person knew, now everyone in the ‘media’ knows. How is that ‘protecting someone’s privacy’ when several thousand people now know the story as a direct result of the injunction? And those several thousand are also telling several thousand others over a pint, and so on. I presume a super injunction can only be imposed if the story is true (otherwise it’s up to libel laws?), so therefore the first several thousand know its true, and can tell their mates that’s the case. And so on.
As a direct result of the superinjunction, I now know Ryan Giggs (who I otherwise wouldn’t recognise in the street) is a total and utter wanker. Gutteral filth.
What did the prossie offer to do that his wife wouldn’t? What perversions does the man have? What sort of creep is he?
Giggsy’s not in the frame for shagging prostitutes – he’s been knobbing Imogen Thomas (I’d never heard of her either, but apparently she was on Big Brother).
Hugh Bonneville’s the one that likes to pay for a bit of rabbit up the bum – another nonentity of whom we would know nothing were it not for his penchant for lawyers.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse
I sense a sarcasm, but: How can I be ignorant of a law that I don’t know exists, and you don’t either, m’lord?
We have seen recently that France operates a code of political omerta.
French politicians can apparently misbehave to the extent of flagrantly breaking the law, with impunity and silence from the French press.
What this means is that French politicians are unsuitable for international posts such as head of the IMF because the French Government elite will always have the inside information to influence the IMF to act in France’s best interests and against the interests of others.
Did they pay that EU fine they were given for blocking the import of British beef?
Non !
Been promoted to the bigger gravy train?
“Schillings, the lawyers who more than any other firm have brought the law into disrepute. “…
IMHO Carter Ruck must run them a *very* close second.
What about our lying, pigging, troughing, thieving, traitorous MPs?
For them it’s just a hobby… Those firms are professionals.
Cherie Blair has always upheld the highest possible standards
I hope you aren’t including me amongst them?
I thought Ruck was spelt with an ‘F’? They always spell it that way in Private Eye…
Carter Fuck – in a league of their own. Purveyors of legal services to the slippery slimy seriously rich
Eady and the other damn fools who think they can interpret the HRA in the opposite manner to which it is worded must share responsibility, surely?
Well done, Guido – excellent stuff. The Establishment hate you and the MSM sneer at you – praise doesn’t come much higher than that.
Oh, how I wish Cookie were still alive, too. And to the likes of Lord Chief Justice “Here comes the” Judge, who wish to muzzle us, I say one word: Maxwell. There was a real thug and a bully who used and abused the legal system to cover up his dirty deeds. The G**dwin affair has only just begun.
Seconded. + 10
+ googleplex² – Just had a wonderful image of the sainted Mr Cook donning the black cap to pronounce a death sentence on the law’s public image – he is sorely missed.
The clip’s been linked to already this week but merits another go:
Robert Maxwell thieving ubber charlatan C UNT ! A ggod friend of Gordon Brown and hero of the Socialist media.
A good friend of Brown?
That’ll explain Brown’s attitude to pensions then…
Could we inveigle Jonah into a pleasure cruise, maybe with slightly dodgy railings on the boat?
Yep As you know Maxwell ran the Mirror group who supported Brown in his rise up the greasy pole. Brown was given a column in The Daily Record in Scotland which was probably Ghost written and was instrumental in raising his profile. I also believe Brown bought the London Flat which he claimed those cleaning expenses on, from Maxwell himself.
Yep you can sure judge a man by the company he keeps.
The biggest news would be a GUTLESS MAINSTREAM MEDIA actually having some balls and actually saying what everybody knows.
Proof again that their cosy little relationships with the establishment make them highly untrustworthy!
Is cos they are screwing them?
According to the Telegraph, Huhne does not have his driving licence as it is in his ‘old’ house where he used to live before shacking up with the AC/DC person he is now with. So, I bet he has already committed an offence in that he may not have told DVLA his new address.
I think he can be done for that at least, never mind the points.
Wonder what he will do if plod stops him and gives him a “producer” – just go to the plod factory and tell them his nasty wifey wont let him have his licence to show them.
What a wanker he is.
Huhne has a face I could never tire of punching. His voice is enough to make me want to punch the fucker’s lights out though.
yop
I wonder if he has changed the address on his vehicle log book? That too is an offence.
Has he informed the Passport issuing authorities of his new address?
How come Huhne can’t remember his speeding ticket? I can remember all mine right back to the 70s. They are not something one forgets.
+1
He’s lying, again.
You are correct, it’s such a pisser when you get one , you tend to remember alright.
Odd that when questioned by Plod next week he intends to remember nothing except not palming the offence off onto someone else.
Even odder that he never mentioned that he could not remember what he was recollecting in the taped conversation.
Injunctions’R'Us
See what you can get for a schilling:
http://tinyurl.com/6yswgtm
LOL!
Someone put the green light over Rod Christie-Millers head and make it as public and violent as possible and we’ll soon see how ”eager” the lickspittles of authoritarianism are to be knocking on random peoples door.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13480815
”Moon rocks are considered national treasure in the United States and their sale is illegal”
That notion is soon going to go to shit once the Chinese get up there.
You’d have thought the unfunny lefty twat would be able to find a compliant tart in the milieu that he inhabiits, without having to pay for it – or is he as slimy and obnoxious as his appearance suggests?
If he had any class, the normal response would be ‘yeah, what of it?’ but no, a typical hypocritical lefty who doesn’t practice what he preaches.
I think lefties are into equality and “respect for women”, so whipping women (and taking delight in it) is probably a bit of a no-no.
Ask Harriet.
Who is David Schneider?
His only claim to fame was a bit-part at the start of 28 Days Later.
(the scientist in the monkey laboratory.)
Never saw it. Any good?
Fuck knows. I’ve never heard of him, until now.
He fannied about in some of Armando Ianucci’s stuff and was in Alan Partridege occassionally but….err….he’s nobody.
It explains this story in the Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8502585/David-Schneiders-fans-clamour-for-his-return-to-Twitter.html then.
Some of carter Rucks clients:
Kate and Gerry McCann
Simon Cowell
Trafigura
Liam Gallagher
Tom Watson MP
Derek Simpson
The Right Honourable Bob Ainsworth MP
Sienna Miller
Right Hon Michael J Martin MP
Hugh Laurie
Koo Stark
Sir Elton John
http://www.carter-ruck.com/Home/
With the exception of Hugh Laurie, there’s not a single person there who would merit a micturation to mitigate a conflagration…
”The Right Honourable Bob Ainsworth MP”
Interesting wonder what useless Bob has got hidden away.
His secret lovechild with Olive from his time in On the Buses, perhaps?
His suicide? A man can dream, can’t he?
Parag, the word is micturition and not micturation.
Here are some names:
Colin Montgomerie
David Beckham
John Terry
Ashley Cole
Avram Grant
Steven Gerrard
Robbie Fowler
Rio Ferdinand
Steve McManaman
Garry Flitcroft
Tiger Woods
Hugh Bonneville
Jose Mourinho
Beautiful day today…
We all know Monty’s fucking shite so God alone knows why anyone would care that he’s a complete tosser too.
Odd man out round, I see. They all like to knock balls about except Bonneville who likes to be knocked up?
I wish I was underneath you getting a good grinding.
If they lock you up Guido, will you be blogging from your Cell?
“ two years in jail or a fine of several thousand pounds.
Blogger reveals that billionaire obtained gagging order
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8526208/Blogger-reveals-that-billionaire-obtained-gagging-order.html
“Football Focus’s Dan Walker looks forward to the final weekend of the Premier League season, featuring Ryan Giggs, Lord Sugar and Alastair Campbell’s predictions and the Sutton brothers.”
So Ryan what was it like to score away from Home?
It would be funny if it wasn’t the former Mr Wilson who issued the superinjunction.
Britain’s legal establishment is fast becoming the laughing stock of the World….their latest foray against Twitter is a total nonsense.. all Twitter has to do is refuse to accept the writ which means the matter must then go the The American Courts …….the yanks will never accept a British Court involving themselves in the USA against “Freedom of Speech” which is enshrined in their Constitution……if I was the “unknown celebrity” I’d ask for a refund cos’ his action will get nowhere……apart from getting him another six-figure legal bill
Strange how the “uncontrolled” Internet is fine when used against the established order in other parts of the world, but is not when used for a similar purpose here?
Indeed…
Watch for them calling for ISP’s to be state owned in the future;
”Cuba’s only two Internet service providers are state owned and surveillance is extensive”
It works for us.
Ah yes, the good old BBC and their ‘Have Your Say’ pages; more appropriately titled ‘Have Your Say As Long It’s What We Want You To Say’. Nice the way that a ‘non-commercial’, no advertising, license payer subsidized company has branched out into advertising. Oh, did you miss that? Well of course you did, unless you’re outside the UK. In which case your BBC online will be littered with advertising. Let’s not forget who decides how much money they get in addition to the license fee, the government. Will the BBC bite the hand that feeds them?
PS. BBC Worldwide profits for 2010 looked good – £140 million. Nice to see they’re turning a record profit with our license money, and spreading the good word of the government to all corners of the earth at the same time.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/24/bbc-worldwide-profit
I’d be more concerned about possible abuse of the Digital Economy Act – since lawyers’ letters are inevitably “creative work”, they may claim copyright on their ludicrous arguments and use the DEA to chase those who dare to dissent.
It’s already tried by some lawyers in the US – they send a site owner a threatening letter, and reserve copyright so that the recipient is open to legal challenge if they publish the threat or even the existence of it.
Expect more creative flummery of this sort in the UK under Mandelson’s stupid law.
But we are a democracy, and the judiciary must never be questioned or held to account.
If it’s used to fight those dodgy beige types who
buy our planes and tanksoppress their people, then fine, but why attack the rule of law in the cradle of democracy?Free speech is only fine for foreigners – witness the antics of Anjem Choudary and his cohorts vs the silencing of the native population of these isles.
“If there is hope, it lies in the proles. If they could become conscious of their own strength, they would have no need to conspire. History does not matter to them. “
That’s what the Memory Hole was for
This weekend Mr Huhne is braced for further revelations from his estranged wife about the alleged speeding offence. Right wing political blogger,Guido Fawkes, said he should step aside when he is charged by police.
Ed Miliband of the Traffic Police sums up the Huhne mystery.
“He was driving too far, too fast.”
Here are some more names:
Ewan McGregor
David Threlfall
Naomi Campbell
Amy Winehouse
Kate Moss
Howard Donald
Elton John
Andrew Marr
Fred Goodwin
Trafigura
Zac Goldsmith
Max Moseley
Michael Napier
Gordon Ramsay
Geraldine McWilliams (Glasgow Council)
Hi Judge Judge!
The Glasgow Council one IS THE FUCKING PUBLIC INTEREST! Judges need to start getting sacked ffs.
What about Purcells gagging order. If his spectacular fall from grace is not in the Public Intrest then nothing is. The Scottish media had no appetite to challenge this I wonder why . No Actually I don’t as it’s pretty clear why they sat on their hands.
If the footy player had just put his hands up and said fair cop and then asked to add his own account to the Sunday expose, then it would have all been forgotten by now. Seems to me the gigging order and subsequent action against Twitter has achieved exactly the opposite that was intended.
They say this bloke is a decent man. Then he should have done the decent thing, owned up and apologised to his wife and children.
Yeah, right. Manchester United has a hideous culture of prostitution, drugs, pay offs, bullying, and general gangster criminality.
We tend to get off with speeding offences as well.
Love Guido Fawkes’ attitude- guy just rocks. He’s talented, positive, rebellious, and optimistic toward life.
Worse than that, the “male chief executive” was his own father in law!
Couldn’t make it up, could you?
Why is Gordon Ramsey still owed wages for sacking a male chef?
Saving Ryans Privates.
Schillings: oops, we accidentally shot them off.
I want to be head of the IMF or I’ll Nokia a baby.
Bring me the head of the IMF.
“We protect those in the public eye from unwarranted intrusions into their personal lives “
http://www.schillings.co.uk/
Well you are going a funny way about it then, when you have just exposed your clent to the whole world.
This guy needs to sack his legal advisers and refuse to pay their bill…who the hell advised him to try and sue “Twitter” which has no offices in the UK and can just tell the UK courts to “take a running jump”…if they think that the US Courts are going to take any notice of this attempt which runs counter to their Constitution then the best of luck…let’s hope he has better luck on the field than in the courts…by attempting to sue Twitter he’s gone global…both Twitter and the “Net” are buzzing with his name…from nobody apart from him,his mistress and his missis needing to know or care he’s just made the whole World aware of his indiscretions…what a “plonker” …….still a nice little earner for “M’Learned Friends”
Good work if you can get it, now fuck off
If you can find an honest solicitor (or better still one who’s heavily drunk) they will tell you that the longer and louder they can make a case, the more money they make. Win, loose or draw they get paid for every letter or breath they take ‘on your behalf’. I actually know of solicitors, who upon taking over an old case, turned around and told their new client that the client’s previous legal team had just milked them for hundreds of thousands whilst doing a piss poor job of representing them…
We do Liebour’s shilling.
A quarter pounder with cheese.
How come I’ve never heard that one before?
Heard it in the comedy film Cedar Rapids.
What is a vacation scheme?
A vacation scheme offers you the opportunity to get a taste of life as a lawyer at Schillings and to see how the Firm works from the inside by spending one week working alongside one of our litigation teams. We will provide a programme of events designed to demonstrate the type of work we do, the clients we work for and how we have been able to establish the high profile and reputation we have in our field of law.
We will provide you with the opportunity to:
◦Sit in on discussions where we decide our approach to client issues
◦Attend court
◦Assist with client matters
◦Research and present to the Firm on a topical issue
◦Support the business development team with various marketing activities
We will provide you with a ‘buddy’ from within our fee earning team to support you during your time with us and the vacation scheme will provide you with the opportunity to make a name for yourself within the firm and establish valuable relationships with our fee earners.
What you need to do to apply
Applications for the 2011 Vacation Scheme and 2013 Training Contracts are now closed.
If you would like any details about the 2012 Vacation Scheme and 2014 Training Contracts please email Charlotte.Brooks@schillings.co.uk
Looks like they let one of their boot camp attendees decide that trying to get a Norwich Pharmacal order against a non-UK entity was a good idea, then!
Looks like it’s a good day to bury bad news
Schillings sued by client for flouting data protection law.
Christ on a bike, Caroline Flint looks foul on Sky news. She is the archetypal scrubber. Apparently Eddie will be making a speech this afternoon to some leftie shit tank called Progress.
Fucking unbelievable. Flint just said she will expect the broadcasters to show Ed’s speech. Still the same nasty party, they don’t even try and disguise their bullying and fascistic tendencies towards the news media. “You vill broadcast our words or you vill face the consequences!”
Schillings should have enough clients by now to get up a good football team, they could play for charity with brown paper bags over their heads.
- and johnnies over their tools.
Look around the court, is that Prick present?.
Ryan Giggs, meet the Barbra Streisand Effect you dumb motherfucker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Lorna Dunkley gives me the horn.
the news readers in the private sector (Sky) are much fitter than the dogs at the BBC.
Agree, with the exception of the fragrant Susanna(h?) Reid.
Om nom nom nom!
The totty at Sky sports news is even better, Sarah Jane Mee and co .
Agreed SJM likes to flash the thigh as well.
I regularly crack one off over Fiona Bruce
Some days you get up and put the horn to your chops and it sounds pretty good and you win. Some days you try and nothing works and the horn wins. This goes on and on and then you die and the horn wins.
Once a Huhne,always a Huhne !!
Under fire Cabinet minister Chris Huhne was under fresh pressure today following the disclosure that he faces a complaint about his general election expenses.
Two former Liberal Democrat councillors in the Energy Secretary’s Eastleigh constituency in Hampshire have submitted a formal complaint to the official elections watchdog alleging he made a “false declaration” of his expenses.
The allegation is based on a recording of a local party meeting where treasurer Anne Winstanley is heard saying that the elections “have cost more than we declared”.
Mr Huhne strongly denied the charge, insisting his expenses were in order. Aides said he was confident the claims would be dismissed, arguing that they were was based on a misunderstanding of was said at the meeting.
However the confirmation by the Electoral Commission that it has received an official complaint will only intensify the pressure he currently faces.
First they came for twitter , i said nothing…..
Guilty but insane.
Guido and others are just doing us a favour to tell us what we are not allowed to know or publish – else how would we know. I have had no order served on me so would have no other way of finding out. I would be breaking the law unwittingly and we all know ignorance is no defence.
So thank you one and all for let giving us a chance to keep to the judgement.
Perhaps you could tell us what else we are not allowed to know.
I yelled “gooooal!” every time I bust a nut inside her.
only in this country can it be illegal to tell the truth.
Let’s make that law: we’d never break that one.
Right! We are censoring the internet now. Stop it, you lot. You can all go home. Thank you. Pipe down at the back or I’ll have you arrested. No whispering, conferring or twittering.
Judge Judge
The prime suspect has been tracked down.
Brilliant!
Our politicians are quietly hoping that this court order against Twitter works. For years they got away with their thieving (yes the MSM knew about it) their fucking of kids and drug use and their corruption. The MSM are in the pockets of the political elite.
Drop one of them in it and you get cut out of the loop.
Nick Robinson stated on the BBC for years that Brown wasn’t the thug or bully, yet after the one eyed shit got booted out Robinson and others came out and admitted they knew of Brown’s violent temper.
The MSM is only annoyed because people are finding out what a corrupt bunch THEY are as well.
We peddle lies for Liebour. Why else would they call me Toenails ??
It was all kicking off a few moments ago on Dateline London between the arab journo and the is raeli journo. The conflict in a microcosm.
Igor, Baron Judge PC, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, has become even a bigger joke than Mervyn Griffith-Jones who invited the jury in the Penguin Books/Lady Chatterley obscenity trial, in 1960, to consider whether the novel was something “you would even wish your wife or servants to read”. Griffith-Jones has long been cited as representing the extent to which the “British Establishment” had become out of touch with popular opinion of that time. Half a century later, Lord Judge has elevated this disjuncture to a new level.
I don’t blame Gi ggs. She has a stunning pair of norks.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/01/30/article-1132163-033D13D2000005DC-597_468x672.jpg
Plastic fantastic !!!
Put it this way. Plastic flowers look ok from a distance but close up they have no scent, look unreal and feel like brillo pads.
Angela Eagle on sky news. She just said they can’t be expected to have new policies as soon as they’re out of government! Lorna Dunkley just pointed out that under Labour we’d be having cuts too.
so if they have no policies there is no need to cover Eds speech.
If there ever was any need in the first place…
I thought labours polices got rejected at the election, oh wait they dont have polices
The coalition are cutting too deep, too fatht! We’d cut lethh deep, lethh fatht!
As far as i know there is only one cricketer with a super-injuction (rumoured) out.
Hey Billy, leave it out please about Liz Hurley and me.
Using lawyers like Farter-Cuck or Shillins is tantamount to holding up your hand and saying ‘I’m a wrong ‘un.’
The wonder is that these firms actually have any clients.
A dozen good’uns pays the bills
The world is full of wrong uns getting into trouble. A law firm that specialises in helping them get out of trouble will always have a healthy trade.
popcorn popcorn , gedda de popcorn its a progress confernece to be headlined by a Edward Miliband, roll up roll up , in it Ed will try and say , uh oh ,you know we got a few things wrong , but labour can offer people a less pessimistic future (still with a load of debt , but less pessamistic ). Moneys on he comes across as Harry Enfields “tory boy” characture trying to pull a fast one .
Just for the record ,perfect set of books in 97 to biggest bust is one achievement ,but it wasnt just banking collapse it was off balance sheet debts , departmental debts and unfunded public sector pensions all of which Labour crowed about as success , when all they did was live it up for 13yrs and leave a 10yr bill to pay for it .
I appreciate they are using this special moment to draw a line under it , but they are still lying about what they did .
I would like to know just how many people would be in employment if 50% of the banking sectore had not been nationalised and 28bn had not been racked up in MOD , there has to be a figure as to how many jobs Labours goverment debt has cost .
I dont think dont kill the fluffy bunny routine will work , this is a decade disaster for the UK , run and governed under labour
The Monganator has started dribbling, I mean speaking. The c unt just said he’s going to set out how they’ll win the next election. Some subtle digs at Brown. He said at the last election Labour wasn’t a party of the future and didn’t earn a majority. I wonder how many Nokias that will send flying.
Ed has said “we’ve got to be honest” about 5 times in his speech so far. The mong doth protest too much.
“weve got to be honest”
Ok why doesnt he just say that socailisim always runs out of other peoples money?
There’s genuine honesty and there’s socialist honesty.
Never the twain shall meet.
I think you may have a problem. It is a Saturday afternoon and you are wasting your life listening to Ed Miliband.
Seek help.
Quickly.
So in a nutshell. Once an injunction has been issued and you tell lies about the injunctor that is OK but if you tell the truth then you can go to prison?
Why not introduce Super injunction insurance which means that you are covered throughout the period your policy runs ie any adulterous relationships you enter into will automatically be covered. So
Hotel Room booked, check
Ready excuse for absence from home overnight, check
Condoms ,check
Injunction insurance , check.
Sorted !
Another footballing love rat has applied for a gigging order.
who?
whatever will be,will be.So the Banks run the UK and all governments suck
and who is on our side?Sack all MP’s and bring in another system ’cause
democracy is a flawed concept and is in need of an upgrade