This isn’t a surprise. The Clerk of the Parliaments, Michael Pownall, gave the Lords almost free reign to continue troughing by ruling that there is no definition of main residence for the purposes of expenses. A ruling almost designed to make a prosecution impossible. Uncharged is not the same as innocent…
Downing Street Exodus | Paul Goodman
Banned Words in Blog Comments | Telegraph
Tim Montgomerie, Super-Blogger | Tatler
All Could Be Forgiven Dave | Telegraph
MPs’ £27,000 Loos Survey | Sun
Hunt’s Evidence | Nick Robinson
Watson Totally Wrong on Sheridan Facts | Spectator
The Government Will Beat the Unions This Time | The Commentator
Prepare for Osborne’s Referendum Gamble | FT
If David Cameron Was Run Over By a Bus?| Sue Cameron
Pasty Oops | Scrapbook
Putin Snubs Olympics | Guardian
U-Turns are Damaging Credibility | Nick de Bois
DeFRA U-Turns | Countryside Alliance
McTernan Goes Malcolm Tucker | The Age
Krugman is an Idiot II | Telegraph
Stop the Milking | Nick Wood
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sun says…
“Why doesn’t George Osborne just get a box of matches, set fire to his Budget and start all over again?”
WTF?
We’re all letting the first female Muslim peer off together.
http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.com/2010/03/uddin-not-be-charged-over-100k-expenses.html
You almost mentioned Lord Hanningfield again Guido.
That was a close one!
you seem like a rowdy little urchin… run along.
i am innocent & rich. i am above the law because i am labour.
I’ve always been horrified by suicide bombers and could never comprehend their mentality. Now I think I understand. I am so disgusted and very, very angered by the lack of justice regarding MPs and ‘nobles’ that I’d be prepared to give up my freedom and even my life to bring them to account.
pissed off voter, that’s hilarious. So you can’t understand why, for example, Tamils would blow themselves up in response to thousands of their compatriots being slaughtered, but you CAN understand it in reponse to a bunch of troughers squeezing a few pennies out of you.
You are one disturbed f*cker.
Positive discrimination?
There’s a suspicion here that there would have been a prosecution had it been a Tory peer, especially one with an aristocratic background. I think there may be some truth in it, but I rather think that the authirities did feel that it would send a poor message if the first Female Muslim lord ended up in serious trouble and prosecuted, and I wonder if the clarification of the rules was designed with this in mind.
It is quite clear that she is guilty of fraud, and had it not been for the ‘new rules’ then she would most certainly have been in the dock.
Where is Harman now with her ‘court of public opinion!’ I wonder? Is this the wrong case for her argument? Her silence in this matter as leader of the House is suprising at best, as has been Baroness Royall.
Mandelslug has benefitted from being an MP and now a troughing Lord. Where is the Labour Party on their promise to clean up politics?? Where is McSlug brown making sure standards are upheld?? What a disgrace for a ruling party not to act on its promises- what did McSlugbrown say this week-”I will not let you down” Like fuck he won’t!!
Couldn’t agree with you more Tony E – oh to be a muslim in this country today – they’ve got it bloody made thanks to Mad Gordo and co.
Look at the “NADine’s on them !
wow an englishman suicide bomber who wants to kill white terrorists. I see a legend and songs about you
Iz it coz she is black?
Is it coz I called scotland I got away wiv it as well?
BRING BACK THE HEREDITORIES! They were better than this shower of shit.
too right they were, and of independant mind.
I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The tossers we have now in the Lords can’t string a sentence together, and yet they are supposed to be the upper house!
too bloody right!
She’s ‘avin’ a larf…………………..at our expense. Hang the bastard!
There is no God
I am your god!
you are all stupid old eenglish keyborad warriors.while i am the uddin of marble.i laugh at you
A pedant writes; FFS Guido, it’s ‘free rein’ as in giving a horse its head, going faster.
your guidos handler and I claim my 5 pounds
Maybe he meant free rain. If there is such a thing as free rain.
Baroness Udders – milking the system for all it is worth.
Ever since the command & control Nu Soviets destroyed our way of life, they have encouraged corruption in public life – through preferment, cash for honours, kitchen politburo governance, bribes and bonuses for public servants and career politicians (rather than those choosing to serve their country).
The loss of heritary peerages has now meant that opportunists and favoured creepoids now fill the Chamber, rather than people who could – largely – afford not to be bribed and who, in general acted out of duty to their country.
Indeed.
Seconded !
Hereditary or appointed, only difference is where they got rich
The hereditaries got handed their loot by Daddy. The appointees had to work really hard faking all those expense claims to trouser taxpayer money.
Yeah I can really see the similarity there.
You gotta pick a pocket
or 60 million pockets
Scotland broke her own law, and still we hear nothing.
Not exactly easy to claim ignorance of the law in that case is it?
Oh wait……………!
Ignorance v Arrogance
That sucks! Thieving dishonest cow gets away with it!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/12/nick-clegg-defends-former-porn-director-anna-arrowsmith
better example here.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/12/nick-clegg-defends-former-porn-director-anna-arrowsmith
she’d be an excellent director of cabinet affairs.
My type of cabinet minister at last
I thought John “the pieman” Prescott held that position!
anna has the dirt.
Anyone reading the article in The Sunday Times a couple of weeks ago regarding the piss poor quality of the CPS as a result of positive discrimination will hardly be surprised that that they fail to bring charges against such a foul example of the human race. It’s circle wagons time for these c***s. Maybe someone should try a tax evasion case – I’d have thought there’s a low likelihood of her having paid any tax on this income. Worked for Capone.
Hear hear.
As its Michael Pownall Clerk of the Parliaments who helpfully changed the rules, perhaps Mr Fawkes would consider some cross-hairs work on him and his cronies?
Absolutely clear that all sorts of race/religion/ethnic/CPS conflict-of-interest issues in play in this decision – probably ably abetted by Scotland, another Baroness with a track record.
why do you all think guido is so fucking powerful. He drops an url with a lil old comment or 2 and leaves it to the real bloggers, ie you the commentators.
Lehman Brothers promoted an unqualified woman to a financial control position as there was no woman there at that position anywhere on Wall Street.
They went out of business.
That is oestrogen for you innit Harriet?
This is an unbelievable decision. They do not beleive they can proscecute given the main residence status and that no guidelines are provided. It appears someone has then provided some guidance saying that you can stay one day per month in a this property and as a result can then call it your main residence. FFS this si surely wrong. This stinks to high heaven and not enough questions being asked. Our judiciary system serves to protect MP’s and Peers and throw the book at Joe Public. These troughers just do not get it.
CPS = Lawyers = Kill Check
MP = Thief = Kill Check
Lord = Corrupt = Kill Check
Oh. My. God.
Here’s the Sunday Times article: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7043985.ece
The author mentions the sea of non-white faces in the CPS’s literature. Google their site and click on the ‘careers’ tab. Then bear in mind only 2-3% of the population are black.
first the media, then the law, next the gubberment.
I think it’s closer to 8%, but your central contention stands.
Mmmmm… Suck, suck, slurp, slurp. Yum yum….
Yo Sista, Hi5.
Oh! That is dishoonest thieving pig you insensitive clod!
Fagin, a treasured old english jew
Any surprise?
This is the broken Britain – demolished by the fraudster brown and his thugs.
6 weeks left and he is out.
Remember ANY vote that is not Conservative is a vote for BROWN..!!!
Remember ANY vote for ANY of the scum-bags will only encourage them!!!
nonsense.
If your MP is not Labour consider voting for them.
If your MP is Labour vote for the party that came second.
If your MP is in a safe Labour seat consider helping nearby.
Nonsense yourself,
Labour are getting the blame (quite rightly so) for the galactic size mess they’ve made and people revert to the usual tosh of voting tory, just because anybody else will do. It’s too late. The tories are not tory any more, they are marxist trash and Cameron is just as bad as Labour and not a thing will change for the better.
Don’t vote for any of them, then there is no blood on your own hands, and believe me, there’s going to be plenty.
I was replying to Old Tory you silly boy.
Apologies.
Agreed. Labour are banking on several votes going to UKIP hence splitting the tory vote.
The CPS probably chickened out because it’d be “islamophobic” to charge the thieving cow.
Well, perhaps. But do you not think that the aider and abettor of this criminal bunch, one POWNALL, will still be ensconced and handing out our money to the Ermine Vermin?
boooooooooo
“The wherekerrs”
Unite – Labour puppet,bankrolled by us all.
Sick.
All parties (except one) will say there is nothing we can do about it – and, indeed, will not want to do anything about it.
Move along now, there’s nothing to see, etc, etc
we will let them all off !
it’s the right thing to do !
It’s disgusting but there you go – another sad day.
Unbefuckinglievable!
Who paid whom to get her off?
You paid Inland Revenue.
Sick.
Done-but the vile taste lingers.
i dont care if it was for a duck house a rent boy or a shit house seat
there is at least a hundred of these thieving fuckers that should be in the dock but hey they pay the wages of the CPS and the Police so what do you expect ?
the law is for the little people !
Do not vote for the corrupt LabLibCon cabal, they are all pissing in your faces.
Can I watch?
Eat your heart out, Mark
Funny!
How can this possibly be???
It wouldn’t look good if Britain’s first female muslim peer turned out to be a thieving scumbag, would it?
Her gender, religion and social standing should have absolutely fuck all to do with her alledged thievery and punishment or lack of. Unfucking fortunately it does.
Non-white? CHECK.
Female? CHECK.
Muslim? CHECK.
Socialist? CHECK.
It reads like one of Dave Cameron’s selection lists, thinking about it.
That`s cruel, however it is an accurate observation.
noose check
Good point hooters, but the lib/lab/con work for the usurers not us. Is this judgement legal under Common Law? Remember the constitution resides firstly with God, then with us and not the criminal thugs who have taken over the system.
common law is common and protects itself
“But I aint done nuddin so what’s all the fuss about”
mmmff mmf mmfffmm mmmffff
Look you the little people just dont understand. Its only only a technical breach. However if you do we will lock you up and throw away the key.
I am the baroness thieving bitch of Uddin
It’s a bit like forgetting to pay the congestion charge.
Thieving cow, at leasther reputation will never recover from this. It’s in the gutter where it belongs.
Pity she isn’t behind bars though.
What is the difference between her case and the other Lord who has been charged? I can’t see any.Oh wait, she’s muslim, so it would be “islamophobic” to prosecute the first muslim female peer, wouldnt it? Uddin – you are a fucking disgrace.
So we are being told that the deserted flat in Maidstone actually was her main home then?
Despite the fact that several witnesses have stated that Uddin has never lived there?
The new rules say that she only has to say she goes there once a month. In which case my main home in in Mallorca as I go there for more than 12 days a year!
a non-dom?
could the police just ask her “how often have you visited the property in the last six months?”
My impression is that it would be hard for Uddin to give a truthful answer that would even satisfy the once a month visit requirement
Our word was not good enough
Anybody fancy a private prosecution?
I will gladly contribute to the fund. This is a fucking outrage.
Count me in for a tenner.
Count me in for a .357
Count me in for £5,000. I want to see the thieving bitches neck stretched
Count me in for a few £££s as well.
Now where can I find some old fashioned leaded petrol and a length of hosepipe,either that or can somebody give me directions to the dignitas clinic
Happy to help. 4 * leaded petrol on sale at a roadside garage on the A27 at Sherfield English. 5m NW of Romsey in Hampshire. Passed it the other day.
If we can get a pub landlord out
we sure can get these four robbing bastards IN !
I’d love to, but the CPS would take over the case as they have a legal right so to do, and then it would be quietly dropped. The DPP is a political appointment, not a civil service one, (althought it is not meant to be).
Tyranny begins when the ruling elite, put themselves beyond the law.
The CPS are interesting aren’t they. A mother I know of reported a 70 yr old relation to the Police because he had been sexually abusing her 11 yr old daughter. The Police reported back the CPS said there was no case as it was her (the child’s) word against his (the 70 yr old pervert).
But are the CPS behaving legally under Common Law? I would say most definately not.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7043985.ece
Count me in for a score at least! Uddin’s was for me, the most disgusting troughing example of the whole expenses scandal. The deception, the attempt to make the place look furnished when she was rumbled, then finding out that she was reportedly living in affordable housing that was meant for those in need. Then of course, there is the ‘palace’ in Bangladesh.
What an utterly despicable arsehole!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/7427630/Baroness-Uddin-cleared-over-expenses-scandal.html
In order that our faith in British justice can be maintained, (Ha bloody ha), are we going to get an explanation as to why her ladyship does not have to answer charges?
I forgot;
“However, a recent ruling by the Lords authorities determined that peers could nominate a property as their “main” home even if they only “visit” it at least once a month.”
The House of Lords, being the highest authority in the land, has ruled that “occasional” now means “Main” and that “Guilty” now means “Innocent”.
The Court of public opinion says otherwise. Their Lordships have been incredibly stupid and appear unstoppable in their determination to destroy the reputation of the Upper House and ALL those who sit in it.
If there are ANY Lords with decency and integrity, they should resign in disgust.
I wonder how “Recent” the ruling was ?
it fucking stinks !
The ruling was made in November 2009. It’s called changing the law after the event.
Buckingham Palace.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
Alice is marrying one of the guards.
“A soldier’s life is terribly hard,”
Says Alice.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
We saw a guard in a sentry-box.
“One of the sergeants had no socks,”
Says Alice.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
We looked for Brown but he never came.
“Well, God take care of him, all the same,”
Says Alice.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
They’ve great big parties inside the grounds.
Every day it’s a million pounds,”
Says Alice.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
A face looked out, but it wasn’t the King’s.
It was a noble Lord a signing things
Expenses; Says Alice.
They’re changing the law at Buckingham Palace –
Christopher Robin went down on Alice.
“Do you think the Lords know all about me?”
“Don’t think so dear, it’s time for tea,”
Says Alice
Apologies to AA Milne.
i bet lord mandlescum dreamed that one up!
The only answer is not to vote for any of the three main parties.
The rot affects them all.
Agreed.
If only that would work. You are assuming that your vote is an affirmative action. It is not. When you vote you have a choice to vote for the party that normally wins in your area or you vote for their nearest opposition. This system means swapsies between lab/con will continue ad nauseam. In some areas there is a three way but that is not the norm by far. The only way is not to vote at all. Then with good concience you can say nothing they do is in your name. By voting you justify the system which is corrupt to the core.
As you say, Mr Cat
Agreed. A vote for LabConLibUKIP is simply giving them a mandate.
Agreed #2
Lords my arse
Oliver Cromwell Speech – Dissolution of the Long Parliament
Dissolution of the Long Parliament by Oliver Cromwell given to the House of Commons, 20 April 1653
It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.
Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?
Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.
In the name of God, go!
This was the Rump Parliament, surely?
NO change there then !
I’ve just checked my moral compass and its pointing due south so that means ‘Its the right thing to do’.
As you were.
Carry on troughing.
One has to wonder just what sort of a family life the Rev Brown’s rule in the manse was like to produce a hypocrite of Gordum’s magnificence.
Then, of course, there is the ‘scotish question, D notices and Dunblane.’
Hardly bears thinking about, does it!
One has to wonder just what sort of a family life the Rev Brown’s rule in the manse was like to produce a hypocrite of Gordum’s magnificence.
The mod does not seem to like the rest of what I wrote.
Don’t mention that town in shitland where all those kiddies died!
D*unblane D*unblane
we dare not say it’s name
Gor Donis Nam Edasapae Dop Hile
Imagine a political class hopelessly compromised and blackmailed by outside interests and powers. A political class always working against your interest and selling your country down the river…
Welcome to the British establishment.
Notice the justice department is headed by the well known quisling straw.
‘quisling’ – I thought he was a dirty jew.
yeah imagine
LIFT UP YOUR EYES AND LOOK NORTH
I wonder what Harriet has to say about the Court of Public Opinion.
We are all shitting in the house of Lords
Faith in justice ? I’ll second that (ha bloody ha) This government and its ‘policing’ (see whim enforcement) service are as corrupt as any banana republic. They are just better at keeping enough people scared enough to not ask why. Who the hell is british anymore ? Yes I did deliberately not capitalise the b. I just happen to have been born here. There is no benefit to me for being born here. If I have any chance to die somewhere else I’ll grab it with both hands.
If you want any justice, anywhere, then you must impose it yourself!
As always, I talk from my own life experience and actions!
Remember the petrol shortages? Up the revolution!!!!!
She doesn’t understand the question?
“But I’ve done nuddin!”
“Free rein”, Guido.
Hang the bitch!
Powder keg lit … fuse glowing nicely.
The people of this country don’t have it in them to fight the system. The keg is filled to the brim with flour. Wrong type of powder sorry.
I’ve got some lovely powder, all over my face.
Custard powder can be highly explosive.
Chapati flour, probably.
Anyone got any peroxide?
…and the flour is stale and full of mouse shit.
Vote Labour!
And get life protection from prosecution.
only if you are an MP or Peer – little people don’t count
TaT? TaT WhO?
what a load of horse shit!
Obviously CPS doesn’t want the charge of being racist. Smacks of the farce over Ali Dizaei, lets just hope it ends the same way!
Unbelievable, a peerage is a free pass to steal!
Do not be so impertinent, I prefer the phrase “full and proper entitlement”, now run along and arrange for me a brace of rentboys, for afternoon amusement.
Coming Your Lordship!
Oy Vey!
Where did it all go wrong for me?
It’s time a definition be made. Let us not forget, these are our taxes they are stealing!
Utter disgrace.
What was telling, was the film, (probably inserted into the BBC’s coverage by someone who has now been sacked today), of the other thieving crooks arriving at court yesterday.
Up till now, I alwys thought the sort of hatred they were being shown was the equivalent of that aimed at worst serial criminals ever, and now I can happily assume that it will get much, much worse for all these charlatans.
Is there a published list of their thievery which can be abbreviated and flung in their faces when the Prime Coward eventually realises that he has to go to the country?
Something like ‘Can you defend your expenses’ being asked over and over again?
There are some sitting MPs standing for re-election who deserve the same treatment.
To be met with “Oink Oink” wherever they go and whenever they appear in their constituency.
Perhaps a car hooter which shrieks that could be a best seller Moley!
Better than Colonel Bogey…
Whatever you do, do not vote for any of the big three, no matter how tempting it may be, they are all crook`s.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5297606/MPs-expenses-Full-list-of-MPs-investigated-by-the-Telegraph.html
hahahaha… suckers!!
we are labour – we look after our own.
i will never be caught – i’ve even put in a claim for my time spent in the police station… it was my “second home” at the time.
Outstanding!
‘Your on your yacht, were on our knees’.
Classic. Try ‘Roots’ by the same.
First class.
Can we all vote for this, as number one, in May.
can we all send a copy of this to each of our MPs
Duka Duka – nice tune
I’m having that, thanks
The woman is an out and out crook. The National Audit Office should have a look at some of the expenses claims she put through the Foreign Office over the past few years
I believe this will help us secure the ethic minority vote for Liebour.
You mean you would rather have absolutely no ethics to ensure you’ve bought off all the ethnics.
Right ?????
Hmm, yet another appointed woman who none can remove, clearly Dismal Dave is a big fan of undemocratic government.
Get rid of the LabLibCon corrupt cabal, they are ALL pissing in our faces.
‘Making the path for the next muslim woman to succeed’
Succeed in doing what?
taking over the country?
No one has held them back or stopped them from doing what they want or from being successful so far, we even let them where their black klu klux klan costumes even though they could be packing bombs or guns under them.
“”"Making the path for the next muslim woman to succeed’
No one has held them back or stopped them from doing what they want or from being successful so far”"”
You’re very wrong. Muslim women are held back – by Muslim men.
Many Muslims interpret Islam in a most racist, sexist and homophobic way.
Because that’s the intended interpretation by the murderous thieving pedophile who started the cult of Mo.
“anything is possible”
it’s not
only for the few, by appointment only
this system of privilege has to be dismantled, if it’s not already too late
BULLSHIT? AC1.
Mohammed invented womens liberation, it is what most of the Koran is about, laws to force women to be treated as humans, with rights.
The koran is one long book of laws, completely ignored by the religion.
What the fluk has the teachings of any Great Master got to do with the religion that follows.
Sweet F.A.
MoHam’ed enslaved
MoHam’ed robbed
MoHam’ed murdered husbands to rape their wives.
MoHam’ed massacred.
MoHam’ed raped a 9 year old girl.
Womens lib? Don’t be a total fool. Mohamed was the nearest thing to an Anti-Christ I can think of, and I’m not religious.
Watching last night’s Question Time – got to the part where the 18 year old soldier’s mother in the audience says that for his 18th birthday,she bought her son some webbing to hold his ammo and kit,as well as other basics.
Even Dimbleby was astonished.
The useless window dressing Labour cow (Flint) was even gobsmacked and advised her to go and talk to her local MP!
Incredible,simply incredible.
We bank roll India and countless other countries who build space rockets and we cannot even send our troops to war with the basic kit.This is absolutely amazing.
I think I may be coming to the Kelvin McKenzie bit in a minute – I need to take time out as my blood has reached boiling point.
The MOD are short of funds after shelling your money out to much more important causes, like Uddins pampering. Soldiers die defending us from evil because the money has been stolen peronally by, err, the evil bastards that sent them out there in the first place, and all as a pointless favour to the Americans.
The Bush americans. The Obama Americans think we’re fucking stupid
Look beyond the politicians to see why our troops are dying.
The politicians, Obama included, are not the masters anymore, they are servants of others.
The MOD are short of funds because the Met Office swallowed a load: expensive computer that does not seem to ever be programmed correctly, a grossly overmanned IT department which does not seem to program correctly, weathermen who don’t know which way the wind blows for all their use in forecasting – but massive self-congratulatory performance bonuses all round.
don’t worry it’ll all be over by April 7th.
no more troop deaths after that.
Dismal Dave supports the war in Afghanistan you twerp. He will do exactly what he is told too.
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!
I’ve got a hypothesis, completely speculative, that Gordon didn’t lose his eyesight in a game of rugby, he had the crap beaten out of him (including a broken jaw) by a bunch of squaddies who were out “queer bashing”.
It would certainly explain his antipathy towards soldiers, and the armed forces in general.
maybe he was beaten up by people who don’t like kiddy fiddlers, unlike the CPS.
Troopers even buy their own desert boots, because the MOD issue ones are such rubbish. It is disgraceful – rather like the cost per soldier per day for food ( in the region of 90P, if memory serves me right) verses the blinky- ballses, troughing through some astronomical figure like 4 grand .
Edward Balls and Eva Ball’s earn £15k NET per month.
They claimed £4k food “allowance” per year.
A woman aged 80yrs gets £4,810 per YEAR to cover her entire costs of living – soon Brown will be taxing her when she dies.
This filth,this monstrosity called Labour are finished.
Actually they claim £9,600 between them (£4,800 each, or the max £400 per month each).
So a soldier gets 90p a day = £328.50p a year
Yet one of the useless BALLS gets £4,800.
THATS 1,361% more than a soldier………
I know who I would rather feed with my taxpayers money.
90p a day. That is less than a prisoner?
Ed Balls has a fascinating level of respect for those who served in wars so he could freely flip his houses and thus steal the taxes they been paying all their lives. He wore a nazi outfit and he claimed £33 for poppy wreaths for starters.
Saw it too, fuck me Jesus. Yet the MOD employs nearly one civil servant for every squaddie and spends billions on a plethora of projects that often come in late and over budget.
Defence procurement is an utter scandal and has been for years; billions on an overdue Nimrod update, no problem but some poor bastard squaddie on the ground doing the work has to have his fucking boots bought by his mum.
Something is very seriously wrong here: any chance of anyone trying to sort it out ? Didn`t think so.
Female + Muslim + Labour Peer = Untouchable
Is she Indian then ?
Sure
The only real Untouchables are a caste in India…
Untouchables in Tibetan Buddism as well. The Daily Lama, what a flikin joke! Without Hollywood Tibetan Buddism would be as reviled as Voodoo!
Japanese Eta were untouchables, abolished now but still active in daily life.
This I am touchy about, coming from along line of untouchables as I do!
Living in a non country is a real pleasure.
Hey, I was pretty untouchable too in my time – a bit like politicians over in Scotland, so I hear.
SAMANTHA CAMERON
Age: 38
Born: Samantha Gwendoline Sheffield, 18 April, 1971, London
Nickname: SamCam
Parents: Sir Reginald Sheffield, 8th baronet, and Viscountess Astor
Heritage: Said to be great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-granddaughter of Nell Gwyn, the mistress of Charles II
Education: Marlborough College, Wiltshire; Bristol Polytechnic – degree in fine art
Perception: Upper-class bohemian
Employment: Creative director at upmarket stationers Smythson of Bond Street; previously worked as professional window dresser and interior designer
Friends: At university, befriended rapper Tricky, with whom she played pool, as well as musician and actor Adrian Thaws
Fashion: Opts for colourful, confident outfits that have seen her dubbed the “eclectic executive”. Her sister, Emily Sheffield, is deputy editor of British edition of Vogue magazine
Tattoos: A dolphin on her ankle
Met David: When Cameron’s younger sister, Clare, then Samantha’s best friend, invited her on a family holiday to Tuscany in 1992
Married David: Oxfordshire, 1996
Samantha on David: “I can honestly say that I don’t think in all that time he’s ever let me down”
David on Samantha: “I know what sustains me the most. She is sitting right there, and I’m incredibly proud to call her my wife”
She says: “I’m a working mum. We have to pay for childcare. I don’t have huge amounts of spare cash to spend on designer clothing. I think all working mums are a bit like that”
They say: “She will always say what she thinks, regardless of who’s sitting there. She comes from a long line of strong women who were in the right place when the right genes were being handed out” – Jane Churchill, designer and friend
It’s nearly her birthday !!
i want chicken fillets, ma.
I had a feeling we were moaning about a thieving bitch named Uddin.
What’s your point…if you have one?
She is uncomfortable in public. Could be a bit of a bugger that……
leave it aaaaatt, you schlagggg.
Yeah…… she’s
(1) Decent
(2) Honest
(3) Original
(4) A general nice person
(5) Caring
(6) Has morals
Just the sort of thing Labour kn ow fuckall about !
She sounds like a nice lass.
I have always got on well with upper class bohemians. Generally one can have an interesting and intelligent conversation with them.
10 minutes conversation with SamCam would be fun. 10 minutes with Sarah Brown would be unbearable.
[i]befriended rapper Tricky[/i]
Indeed – he ‘befriended’ the arse off her.
Yes the Astors are an interesting bunch aren’t they related to the Rothschilds?
“Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul. He’s a liar”
Bouncing weather dwarfs were a major milestone in British TV. Their weather forecasts will be five years old now. We used to shoot them in batches … and it was just luck if the forecast actually coincided with the weather. We were really ahead of our time. If Channel 5 put on Topless Darts at 10pm they would double their ratings”.
The station failed and had to close down.
Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul.
Entirely predictable. Subsidised Housing Association property in East London. Buys empty flat in Maidstone to claim the max.
Yet, as the noble Baroness is aware, there are waiting lists for housing as she demonstrates in her question:
Baroness Uddin (Labour)
My Lords, does my noble friend accept that our policy on homeless families impacts greatly on those who are waiting on the list? Is she aware that about 25,000 families are on the waiting list in east London? What does her department intend to do about the new housing to be built on the Olympic site to address the need for family housing?
Hypocrisy is not a crime but this woman is quite shameless and unelected.
The House of Lords, subsidised by public funds, is not fit for its purpose.
Abolition or a fully elected second chamber is a democratic necessity.
I am sick of shabby corruption
I suggest you send that quote to the editors of the Times, Telegraph, Guardian and Independent and ask them why they have not seen fit to publicise this hypocracy themselves.
The MSM is in on the charade, there is so much going on in this country that is pure distilled evil, yet they hardly mention it in passing.
However, “celebrity got talent” BS and its associated gossip trash, is given wall to wall coverage.
You do not have to be a rocket scientist to work out why that is so.
Sky news is the worst for this kind of shit.
Following on from gormless recent nautical analogy on the economy Uddin falls under the category of “we must not rock the muslim vote”
What disgust’s me more than Uddin is the blatantly corrupt Labour peers caught redhanded over the phone offering to alter legislation for £100,000 bungs and their draconian sentences which were a non apology in the Lords and six months gardening leave.
What a fxxxing shower of shite this government is.
What really pisses me off is that they have not learnt how to do corruption the British way. There’s always been corruption – if you live long enough you hear of funny goings-on here, there, somewhere, on a regular basis. But at least the corrupt hoons have the decency not to wave it in your face but only down the gold club, and know it’s a bad idea to fish the pool dry. But these Udders and Scotchlands – their corruption is indecent, casual, tacky, banana-republic corruption, and their indifference breath-taking.
Electing more toss-pots to tell you what to do does not appear a good solution to me.
Oooh, yes. What a great idea. Replace the amateur criminals with a set of career criminals. Lets get rid of the shabby corruption and replace it with shiny polished corruption. An elected upper house just gives the parties full control.
The House of Lords (just the name is enough) must be abolished along with all non-elected positions. It is a moral outrage. And to the Hunts who defend it here (“it seems to work well,” “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” and other such bullshit), fuck off back to Medieval times you anachronistic bastards.
We could elect them, couldn’t we, because all the elected officials have the highest moral standards when it comes to things like truth and expenses, haven’t they?
I say scrap both Houses, burn it down, with them in it.
http://dailyreferendum.blogspot.com/2010/03/c4-news-video-gordon-brown-is-lying.html
Now we have the truth. Our Generals have said that Gordon Brown cut defence spending, a former head of the MOD said that Gordon Brown had cut defence spending. The only person claiming that Gordon Brown did not cut defence spending – is Gordon Brown himself. And guess what? Gordon is lying again. Here is a video made by the “fact check” team at C4 News:
Don’t forget that these cuts took place while our troops were fighting two wars
You dont understand
Spending has risen (surprising with two major conflicts going on?)
No requests were ever turned down (no point in making them)
You are ALL wrong not me
He didn’t say “no request was turned down”, he said, “no request went unanswered”. Typical fucking weasily words from Gordo.
Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul.
from 53 to my reply thats why i enjoy reading Guiudo fawkes,briliant and right up to date
Well done Brown you really have cleaned up parliament !
Keir Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions, is a bottler
Kier Starmer is a Common Purpose placeman, his job is to protect as many as he can within the ruling elite, from the force of law.
Now on the other hand, if you or I were to involve oursleves in anything like the behaviour of the political class, we would be looking at years in prison for our “misunderstanding” of the law.
Or even something trivial like smoking in your own fucking public house.
MPs & Lords, Rope, Tree branches. Some assembly required.
When events defy the Prime Minister’s preferred view of the world, he has a remarkable capacity for applying the Tipp-Ex. History doesn’t haunt him because he either ignores or rewrites it. No British leader in my lifetime has embraced the technique of veracity evasion with greater enthusiasm.
Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul.
If a flat in Maidstone is her main residence then can the housing association please explain why she is ‘entitled’ to live in one of their houses in East London?. How can it be that a ‘Baroness’ with a second home less than 60 miles away is entitled to live in social housing? I must be missing something here but down my neck of the woods getting any kind of social housing is near impossible. The troughing, corrupt and venal slimeball that is Uddin obviously has many more questions to answer and she is NOT innocent she has just got off because of the sly tricks of Pownall and his ilk, but then the House of Frauds is so corrupt that they will no doubt have made sure that CPS can’t bring any charges against any of their disgusting reprobates who masquerade as our second chamber. Guido get your dynamite ready the people want action and this time lets make sure it succeeds!
Our politicians have adopted doublespeak.
“Main” only means “main” for the purpose of expenses and taxation.
Our politicians have given themselves permission to nominate one of their two (or more) rersidences as “main” for the purposes of expenses, and the other as “Main” for the purposes of Capital Gains tax.
I look forward to seeing this degree of flexibility adopted in all Court cases.
I wonder how the Law Lords would handle an appeal based on the Lords definition of “main”?
Check out the names of the members of the Tower Hamlets Housing Association, councillors and assorted related Udderly disgusting tribalists, see the pattern these people weave in the local authorities where they hold power, understand why she is a Liebour untouchable, just as that other tribalist Kier S already has.
Cos she am coloured. and straw hates the country allowing minorities free reign to pillage the land.
“I am relieved that this ordeal has finally come to an end.”
She added: “I only wish to say thank you to everyone who has supported me through this every difficult time and I now wish to turn back to my professional life and my public duties and my family.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8564017.stm
But Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Starmer said the definition of a peer’s “main home” in the Lords expenses scheme would always have been “critical to any possible criminal proceedings against Baroness Uddin”.
But he said “only or main residence” had not been defined and last November the Clerk of Parliaments Michael Pownall said that ultimately “it is up to members to designate an address as their main residence as they see fit”. He had set a threshold that peers must visit their “main home” at least once a month.
There other stuff to get her thieving ass on.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23685322-well-off-labour-peer-is-a-social-housing-tenant.do
We freed Nick hogan via donations, let’s see if we can jail Trougher Uddin.
Never. Been. Angrier.
The thieving bitch.
Fuckin expensive blowjob Mr Pownall. Hope you came all over her face
And when the Tories are elected in May she’ll change sides and be made a minister. Bet you that.
Bless.
And ‘they’ wonder why the public might now have a dim view of any who wangle a seat at the ‘table’.
At least she didn’t run anyone over doing a Lord/Minister combo.
That would have meant a few good weeks.
Don’t anyone say they haven’t got a sense of humour at the Guardian: ‘Speaking at her home in Shadwell, east London, Lady Uddin said: “I am relieved this ordeal has finally come to an end and I only wish now to say thank you to everyone who supported me through a very difficult time and I now wish to return back to my professional life.”‘
That’s ‘her home in Shadwell’, not the one in wherever she says it is.
The BBC will be on that in a heartbeat!
will they buggery.
I think everyone on here who doesnt agree with this right and just decision should just shut the fuck up. Seriously where do you people get off? The law is to punish and control those that live under it, not those that make it.
No crime has been commited here. Baroness Uddins expenses claims are merely in keeping with her sense of entitlement and self worth. As a Lord, woman and ethnic minority she is entitled to it all, and more besides. I think she has been remarkably restrained in these difficult economic circumstances.
How dare you little people who have to pay tax makes these outrageous demands, who do you think you are? Do you think that working and struggling through this recession (it started in america) entitles you to denigrate your betters? What possible reason can our glorious leaders have for listening to your ‘opinions’ when they consist of nothing more than the pitiful whinings of the eternally jealous. Your all tories arent you?
She has been elevated above us all and is therefore entitled to whatever she sees fit. The fact that people like Manzila Uddin can be raised to these positions is a clear and resounding moral victory for our socialist elite leaders and thinkers. Long live the New Labour experiment!
Anyone who does not agree with this is nothing short of a grubby little facist, and probably a racist too. Get back to your carboard boxes in the middle of the road you wretches, but dont you dare forget to pay your fucking taxes.
I for one welcome this decision as fair, right and just.
She’s a troughing Piggy Bastard who should be in Jail.
But there’s at least several hundred other MPs and Lords who should be joining her and I don’t give a fuck if they are Christian Muslim Conservative Lib Dem or Labour.
THEY SHOULD ALL BE IN COURT FACING FRAUD CHARGES.
Amazing how difficult that simple truth is to understand for the mentally challenged.
The House of Ermine Vermin deserved its name..
Abolish it………
You forgot to mention that the troughing bitch is a muslim as well!!!!!
A peer of the realm claimed expenses for a second home, claiming that their main residence was in a seaside town. It was discovered that the said peer did not, and had never lived at the address claimed as the primary residence.
Whatever the rules might say, to any reasonable person, this looks remarkably like a fiddle. It is hard to imagine anybody outside politics being able to make such claims legitimately.
One suspects that public opinion will not be favourable to the peer of the realm concerned in this case.
Yes that is all well and good but come the election we can all vote them out….oh hang on…
Rules is for the little people
Exactly my point, you little whiners should just shut the fuck up. Complaining about this is unpatriotic and akin to treason. Its not your money she has been claiming, it belongs to Parliament. if they say there is nothing wrong then you have no cause for complaint.
When those blessed with the life skills necessary to become a Peer of the Realm become elevated it inspires terrible jealousy in the small people.
Baroness Udin has worked tirelessly to become a female muslim and as such is has entirely gained her position on merit. That is the essence of the New Labour experiment and long may it continue.
Dont you grubby bastards get it? Peers are ABOVE the law, did you learn nothing from the Baroness Scotland affair?
I am more than honoured to shave Baroness Uddins poodle. If you wretches where ever lucky enough to be invited into the presence of such a leading light then you would agree with the sentiments expressed here. But you are all gruby little tories arent you?
Hands up who REALLY expected a female peer from an ethnic minority to be prosecuted?………….Thought not
I did. I suspect that many others did as well. Justice should apply equally to all – clearly some are more equal than others.
Disgusting.
Your diversity training is obviously out of date. Please bring it up to date as a matter of urgency. Shocking.
fuck me even I`m surprised by this one will pop round see the fat cow and get a few tips nice 1 Udin
Well done liebour – the BeeHenPee vote just shot up.
your fucking right there, all my votes are going there now
Expect the BBC will invite the Baroness on “Question Time” . Stop laughing.
when the uddin scandal broke the “Spitalfields housing association”who owned the flat wanted to know how she got social housing
you need do no more than google Spitalfields H A to see on the list of ceo’s and the committee there is no less than FOUR uddins the rest bar about three are asian so there is your answer !there is also something about claiming 38million pounds in rent subsidies from government and i think i saw a question raised about that flat in margate have a look see what you can find !
Spitalfields housing association
tenants
on. Message ends
Another nail in the coffin of credibility for the House of Lords.
They just can’t help shooting themselves in the foot!
the whole fucking filthy system top to bottom,lords mps cps cops
Get over it Tory twits.
Baroness Uddin has done nothing wrong.
No, she’s a thieving piggy and we all know it, you Labour Lickspittle twat.
The Court of Public Opinion begs to differ.
OF course not. She is wonderful and filled with truth.
Baroness Scotland gets of lightly as well. I notice a theme here.
Herr Hitler aka Brown and Bunker Expenses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYyi-WDMrwQ -
KILL
If there is no definition of main residence
How is it that the Tory Peer has been charged ??
Oh please. BECAUSE HE IS A TORY!
what a fuckwit
Just watched Kelvin McKenzie come out with his superb phrase;
“Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul. He’s a liar”.
Wow – the audience were clapping before he had finished the sentence.
Last week I predicted Conservatives to win by 24 seats – they won’t do so – they will win by 55 plus seats.
Labour know they are finished,hence the increased banshee wailing from Harperson and the sense of doom pervading the Labour cabinet.
Watch for Brown’s behaviour to step up a notch in it’s vileness.These thugs are finished for good.
Brown is a compulsive liar, he has no truth in his soul.
It`s in his DNA
AND the audience was 100% female – now that says something else
WOW
Yes – YouGov doing its best for NuLiebore – but others put it at 8 – 9% or so – with the marginals doing well enough – 40+/30-/20- or thereabouts!
Steady as she goes Troutbridge
or so
or thereabouts
or something
Left hand down a bit.
Will the Clerk of the Parliaments be criminally charged like the clerk of the Fees Office ???
OH YES
Agencies must work together to tackle David Cameron – Alan Johnson
Oscar Nonimation
(Postal Ballors still being counted)
‘Gordon Brown – the Downfall’
Thanks for upholding justice Mr Pownall, sleep well. Disgusting.
Guido, for pities sake take off some of your adverts!
It takes me almost 10 minutes for your site to load now.
As for the Uddin leach, Karma will get you. I hope you come back to life as Cyril Smith’s bicycle saddle.
Yeah. I’m fed up with how slow it is,will be going back to the one site in the world were something is actually happening,www.thetreeofliberty.org
1. Download and install Firefox – it’s faster and better than IE anyway.
2. Install the ‘NoScript’ add-on – allow wp.com and wordpress.com to run scripts so you can read and comment, plus youtube if you want to see videos.
3. Hey Presto – no more pop-ups, just click on an ad if it interests you.
I’m sure there’s probably a way to make Internet Exploder behave, but I can’t be arsed with Microsoft products unless forced to use them for work. Seem to remember a product called ‘AdBlock’ or similar.
I’ve got Firefox and it takes effing hours – even Safari is faster and that’s saying something. Sometimes I come here to drop my pearls of wisdom (© Mandybum leaning over friend’s face) and I have to wait so long I don’t bother.
Weird!
Takes about 5-10 seconds to load here, but then I do have youtube disabled by default.
Mind you, Safari does imply you’re using one of those trendy Apple things – loved the IIE and the original Mac, but now they’re just overpriced PCs…
I’m running Fedora 8 on a not very high spec netbook – as I said, I only do Microsoft under duress
Fedora on netbook – that sounds great. Is it simple to install – e.g. drivers ?
Thanks.
Thanks ‘The Paragnostic ‘ now loads in seconds.
Thank you Paragnostic, most helpful..
Thank you. Now loading in seconds. Good instructions that even a dickhead like me could understand.
Fucking communists do it everytime, everyone gets on alright till the fucking commies get in and makes everyone a victim and starts using ethnicity and religion to fracture and divide the communities.
We need a military coup, everyone in the miltary manages to get on despite the few nut bag muslims who try and kill their own sqaud mates but hell it’s better than being blown up on the tube or a bus or airplane thanks to Labours hug a terrorist and open door immigration policy.
P.s. Again with these bastards, they spend their time out of power whining about how people are unfairly treated and how society is broken so you let them in and what they go and fucking do, instead of level the playing field they give one group all the power over the others.
If this was a white person instead of a muslim they would of been dragged over the coals and doing a long stretch in jail.
A military coup is indeed the only answer. The whole structure of government is rotton to the core and the electorate so manipulated, bribed and marginalised that democracy is wholly moribund and the ballot box a complete waste of time.
We cannot afford another military operation however spending has risen and any requests for additional funds will be treated in line with previous ones
You know the army is a socialist institution from top to bottom, don’t you? Authoritarian socialism with a struct hierarchy is still socialism.
Don’t say ‘white’ say English, or Welsh or Scottish as it plays into the cultural destruction of our society that the Communist Party members running the country and their hidden mates are carrying out and don’t use the foul term the ‘uk’. This land is Britain or the British Isles or England or Wales or Scotland if talking about a country within it. uk means concentration camp in German (pronounced uuukaaa).
UK means concentration camp in England.
Baroness Uddin 7th June 2000 House of Lords
Equally important is the need to create greater opportunities for affordable home ownership in areas where land values and housing costs are prohibitive. My own back yard of Wapping is a prime example. On one side of the street are houses which are in desperate need of modernisation; on the other side are family houses which cost up to £300,000 to buy or £300 per week to rent. I regret to say that there is apartheid in the community due to decades of poor planning. The division between rich and poor is blatant.
Hypocritical (……….) expletive deleted
Uddin’s home in Wapping, where she lives and is registered to vote, is a housing association property. Spitalfields Housing Association received a public subsidy of £37.8 million in 2008. The average rent for its properties is £104 a week, a sixth of the market rate.
The average rent for its properties is £104 a week, a sixth of the market rate.
So, not content with stealing £100K in expenses for a ‘main residence’ in which she does not live, she also effectively defrauds the rest of us to the tune of £25,000 per year by living in subsidised housing provided by a housing association controlled by her relatives?
I don’t mind people from the subcontinent coming to live here, but next time, could they please leave their corrupt political culture at home?
and that’s £100k per annum free of income tax equivalent to a salary of more than £200k a year….on top of all other fiddles, perks etc.
Where you are registered to vote seems as good a definition as any of your main home.
Spitalfields Housing Association management board included (or did last time I checked) members of her family. Hmm.
And I’m not surprised she isnt being charged, unlike the Tory Lord who did something similar – she is, after all, a muslim, and muslims seem to get special treatment by public bodies. This is just the latest in a long line of incidents.
P.S. Isn’t stealing a crime in your religion, Uddin? Or is it ok if it’s against non-muslims? You waste of fucking space.
To prosecute would be racist after all.
The Law of the Land applies equally to all.
Well, it used to….
I’m going lawless of the land
just downloaded a load of credit card details,going shopping toodle pip.luvvly country.thanks
i have lived in several countries around the world but living back here has made me racist. I dont really blame the foreigners but hold the govt responsible by making me feel like a 3rd class citizen just because i a white, middle class and pays tons of tax.
Baroness Udders. Off Scot free. Though her maid gets done. Nice work, if you can fix it…
Incidentally It seems the truth will sue Gordon Brown: for his abuse of it, Labour MPs (Yes ONLY Labour MPs!) in glass cage in court and what will Clegg do, now?
no that was baroness uddins maid
Baroness (congestion charge) Scotchland’s maid ffs!
Udderly Disgusting owns a marble palace in Banglaland thanks to all the savings she enjoys on her subsidised housing association hovel.
Sing along con twats, lyrics are on the side
Is this BA staff’s last christmas party!
Martin Day – really Ed Balls whose wife is leaving him for the journalist.
I’ve been wondering who it is, based on the theory that theres only a few daft sods daft enough to keep on going like this.
12:31 … you’d think if it were a school caretaker he’d be busy with lunchtime chaos.
And the ginner was never that agressive.
Interesting.
I’ve always thought in spite of it probably being mainly pro-union it was slightly taking the piss.
“some kind of superman”
“.. for the working hour, and every other day of the year”.
i see carter fuck was involved and that she refused to answer any questions
so thats it then dont answer any questions
and you walk
simple
what a fucking legal system labour have created !
Carter Fuck is a fucking traitor and will be executed first come the uprising
And islamophobia is meant to be a problem in 21st century Britain, the muslim groups say?
Bollocks.
She got let off the hook while the other Lord was charged for doing the same thing simply because she is muslim – what other explanation can there be?!
More like fucking nonmuslimophobia. Special treatment for them, 2nd class rights for the rest of us. Thanks you idiotic “multicultural lefties”.
mulitcult was always an attack on the British demos and thus democracy.
That’s a clear case of scandalum magnatum my friend, I’ll have your house.
To be fair, I can’t see Baroness Uddin being much of an earner for my parliamentary escort agency. But the good news is that Caroline Flint is working this weekend, £100 for all services (anal £50 extra). First cum, first served.
Well that’s quite spoilt my lunch hour. But as you say Guido uncharged does not make her innocent.
If cameron gets in at the election he has to do something about the Lords because it is no longer fit for purpose having been stuffed full by labour with troughing criminals.
We need an elected Senate so that we can get rid of the likes of uddin, sugar, martin, scotland, foulkes and on and on…………
I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again. The best way to restore the House of Lords to it’s former standing is to clear out all Lords (of all political stripes) appointed since 2000, and invite the Hereditaries to take up their duties again. That system may have been all wrong in theory, but it worked very effectively in practice. As a short-term fix for the problem, whilst a longer-term solution was debated and put in place, that would be the easiest way of cleansing the House of Ermine Vermin, and showing it to have been cleansed.
Agreed – how much corruption was there is old “unfair” system?
nobody caught them so it wan’t there
simples!
One advantage of the old system was that Lords were unpaid, and came to the House generally with no political baggage – they were not beholden to any party, Unions or other influence. As a shield against corruption, that’s about as strong as it can get. Many regarded their constitutional work as a duty – an old-fashioned word having little meaning to the political left, but a very powerful motivator nonetheless.
I met Lord derby when I was kid, not this one his dad. As kids we all used to climb over into the grounds. He came across us one day and was really kind and genuine.he gave us all a plucked goose for Christmas.He made a deep impression on all of us and we were a bunch of Huyton scals.He was honourable and knew what duty meant.
Lucky for you it wasn’t Lord Montagu of Beaulieu.
Heredities: independent means, unpaid, no need for troughing, did it out of sense civic duty. So of course Liebour marxists had to overthrow it , the Fifers slime and scum parteh, its the right thing to do.
I agree, for the short term.
For the long term I think that the lords shold comprise of members of various professional bodies (not tax funded quangos, unions or their ilk), to study the affects of the law on the long term interests of their respective professions.
The professional bodies should reflect all aspects of Britains economy, and should be chartered directly by the Queen (with no political interference) to send representatives in to the house of lords. There are a number of professional bodies already in place for various occupations that could do so. Each representative is their for the duration of their tenure on the professional body, and is funded by and accountable to that professional body.
I would take some working out, but I think that it best modern interpretaion of the original intentions of the house of lords.
Sincere apologies for the typos. Especially “their” not “there”. It’s so embarrassing.
It just needs a minimum age limit. The official retirement age. It is truly amazing how different, the most extreme person gets, when they are past 65. It is like it takes that many years to find out that there is more than just one enemy.
OR
A jury of 100 of the voting public, vote each year to make 4 “redundant”. All those not attending, too sick, or just plain mad. Each can defend themselves before the people. Why not? We are all under redundancy threat due to their inaction. If they where bright, and on the ball, we would not be in this mess of new laws that no one understands. So let the people weed out the waste.
but not Lord Hanningfield
he’s a nice pig
Utter disgrace but did anyone expect anything different ?
no, she is muslim after all.
It aint what you do its the way that you do it
I wish this was the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The House of Lords is not fit for purpose. How can any of them have any self respect at all. How can they presume to legislate on our behalf? They represent noone and nothing but venal self interest.
They obviously won’t clean themselves up, they have no idea how bad they smell.
It’s the entitlement, innit.
The “Lady” is a fraud!
I dont think she is for turning! (Would you want too!)
*
*
*
*
BARANESS ADDIN
PULL DAE UDDER WUN
PADDY IS IN THE BHOGH
AND PADDY IS IN THE WELLIE
SEW WARE IS PADDY
*
*
*
*
PADDY IS IN THE PUB
*
ASTA
You are Silvio and I claim my free five pounds. See you and Paddy in the pub.
Vote Labour!
Vote Brown!
And avoid prosecution.
Have a look at Wikipedia and learn all about the house in wapping where she has lived for 30 years
not the flat she was claiming for
how the rent on these flats is a mere £105 pounds a week less than 1/6th of the market rate
but she saw fit to claim £500 per week for the “upkeep” of said flat
the marble palace in bangladesh the flat in Margate that she has never lived in but has cost US £100,000 the £165 a day attendance allowance she claimed for 179 days more days than the lords actually sat and the highest of any lords claim
WELCOME TO BRITAIN -YOUR WELCOME TO IT …..I’M OFF !
Bet the B*N*P aint on the list either
quick ! someone throw dick sniffin’s gay lover martin webster at them
No man, Mr. President, thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging.
And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free — if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending — if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained — we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable — and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
This is how I feel Labour is treating the UK. The bloke in the film is the average UK voter!
This lets Baroness Scotland off the hook as well. She claimed £170,000 for her house in Chiswick using expenses rules designed for those not living in London.
Next time Gordon rattles on at Dave about wealthy Tories, he should ask how many front bench Labour ministers entered Parliament as poor as church mice and are now millionaires.
The 2006 Green Book guide to Parliamentary salaries, allowances and pensions clearly states in the foreword that “It is your responsibility to satisfy yourself when you submit a claim, or authorise payments from your staffing allowance that any expenditure claimed from the allowances has been wholly, exclusively and neccessarily incurred for the purposes of performing your Parliamentary duties”.
This is now amended to “Parliamentary allowances are designed to ensure that Members are reimbersed for costs properly incurred in the performance of their duties”.
Therefore, Gordon has “woolied up” the definition of the rules to make sure no one can be proved guilty.
Considering the scale of the fraud and deceit afforded by these rules, the CPS have shown themselves to be not fit for purpose (again) by only bringing four cases before the beak.
Roll on the 6th of May
the greenbook assumed “Honourable Gentlemen”
This was very predictable. The thing is she wasn’t there once a month. It’s nice for Keir Starmer that he had a cosy definition land on his lap a few weeks back. It must have been specially concocted for Uddin. Once a month is a nonsense. It doesn’t even mean she had to have ever slept there. Ha ha. She could have just gone in for a coffee and buggered off again on the 1st of every month. It should be days per year. I want to know what she claimed herself. Anyone know if this was made public at all?
The race card has once again been played. There was no chance of anything different with the troughers at government and in the fucking lords. The devious, greedy ethnics have won yet again. This really is a shit country.
and now I am a racist
I’m still fucking furious about this. Where exactly does it leave the law in this country?
It has become more and more obvious that the law can be subverted by MPs and Peers at will. Despite the four convicts in court yesterday, this is tokenism and a show trial – it’s more about parliamentary privilege and it’s extent than it is about the thieving and gross misconduct of MPs.
So where do we go from here?
is it down to the lake i fear?
Zimbabwe, you know it makes sense
There is a serious constitutional question here my friends
The Government, Commons and Lords have lost the LEGITIMACY to govern and legislate…
That means the People have the right to take the Law into their own hands…
agreed
WHY THE FUCK IS SHE IN THE LORDS ANYWAY FUCKIN IMMIGRANT LIEBOUR RUINING BRITAIN AGAIN!
I invite Baroness Uddin to make a considered comment on the following.
Does she agree that Bangladesh is a corrupt and racist country?
And will she protest in the strongest possible terms and advocate a full boycott against a government that practises apalling racism and theft?
Bangladesh’s Vested Property Act (VPA) is a racist law. It provides the government—which really means the corrupt politicians in the ruling party—with the power to seize the homes and farms of innocent citizens and distribute them as graft to their cronies. The VPA has its roots in Pakistan’s Enemy Property Act. After another embarrassing defeat at Indian hands in 1965, the Pakistani government passed a retaliatory law that allowed it to declare citizens (read Hindu citizens) enemies and confiscate their property. The Pakistani law was openly anti-Hindu, which matched the national rhetoric at the time and national sentiment most of the time.
When Bangladesh passed the VPA three years after its independence, it had to be more circumspect in its description, even though the law was worded to make it clear that the VPA’s substance was no different from its Pakistani forebear. After all, the Awami League politicians who passed the VPA then and now tries to maintain a fiction that they care about Bangladesh’s non-Muslim minorities. Good politics, you know. Moreover, most people still appreciated the fact that Bangladeshi independence was possible about only with the help of Indian arms. But the effect was the same. While the act has been used against other religious and ethnic minorities, Hindus have been the real targets. Professor Abul Barkat of Dhaka University undertook the most authoritative study of the VPA and concluded that by 1997, 40 percent of Hindu families in Bangladesh had been affected by it and more than half of all Hindu-owned land already had been confiscated under the act. Much more land and many more Hindus have been affected in the eleven years since then. So, there is no doubt that the VPA is a critical ingredient in ethnic cleansing. The fact that the percent of Hindus in Bangladesh has been cut in half concurrent with the act is evidence of those even more sinister, ethnic cleansing, motives behind the law.
Its clearly not corrupt enough for her, thats why shes here, far more opportunities to fill her boots.
Our so called government has a word for regimes like that – “AMATEURS”.
In any decent democracy the opposition would tear the government apart over these corrupt politicians. But of course in our system the opposition are as guilty as the government.
the people are the opposition
Now we all know this lying, corrupt, cancerous government is a national disgrace.
But they are still polling over 30 points. What the fuck are these people thinking who are going to keep Leibour in power ? How can anyone with an objective mind even consider voting for this shower of shit ?
Yet there they sit, lead by the gurning idiot, and the Tories are rightly worried.
It’s beyond me.
Latest Angus Reid poll shows labour on 26 and tories on 39. But I agree even 26% seems excessive for this venal incompetent troughing government.
the majority don’t know,get printing and distributing.
Generally categorised as follows:
1. We are working class and always vote labour, my father would turn in his grave if I voted Tory
2. I am a public employee and my job depends on Labour
3. Those nice people let me in so I better vote for them
4. I just filled in the piece of paper those nice labour people were kind enough to send me
5. Ugh Tory Scum Ugh
6. Well Lord Fondlebum looks so nice and dapper don’t you know
7. I work for the BBC enough said
Oi!! don’t forget us!!
“To avoid complications, she never kept the same address
In conversation, she spoke just like a Baroness…”
(from Killer Uddin by Queen)
I must say, the modern aristocracy are a rum lot. Nothing against having a Baroness Uddin or a Baron Masambulu of Peckham as such, but this scrabbling about for a few quid in expenses is terribly infra dig. I don’t expect to get paid for opening the village fete at Waad Parva. You really can’t be a peer and a sort of low box-wallah at the same time. Sorry, Udders old girl, but noblesse oblige and all that, once you become a peer you ought to live up to it.
Hmmmmm I wonder what would have happened if it was a ‘whitey’ male Tory Lord ?? Of course…..go straight to Court do not collect you ill gotten gains!!
Quite so Sir Wills.
But then how could she ever square it with slumming in Tottering Hamlets’ council housing ?
Lefties today! Leave so much to be desired.
Interesting link Guido on SNP and Purcell..
Also comments by Police in Scotland…
There has been a clear breakkdown of law and order in Glasgow…staring with the ex-Labour “Leader” and organised crime links…
This should be a major story…
As many have pointed out on this blog for years, Labour in Scotland = Organised Crime
Post mortem results soon to be released(or not knowing liebour)on the sudden death outside Glasgow city council of Steven Purcells young man friend Mr D.Anus Mckinlay. .There is some serious sh-t going on in GCC.The lid could come off as soon as next week.Watch this space.Och the new.
Uncharged is not the same as innocent…
Thankfully it is in our legal system – even charged is still innocent.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2889645/PM-snubbed-as-Cameron-gets-Kozy.html
I see sarkozy has asked to meet cameron today on his trip to London as well as officially meeting gordon. sarkozy is apparently laying the ground for when, he believes, cameron will become pm.
A spokesman at no10 said ‘gordon was not happy about it’. No doubt he’s been spewing foul mouthed diatribes at his staff again and throwing nokias at other people’s heads. Not much longer now before we see the back of him.
At least Sarkozy has the decency to visit Gordon to say GoodBye !
Good job I kept my visit to Hariet Harman a secret then.
Dave had better keep SamCam hidden – Sarko’s at a loose end at the moment, if the rumours are true.
What isn’t a rumour, though, is what the little Hungarian shit’s grandfather did in WWII…
Enthusiastic member of the Arrow Cross party?
He was very keen on the Semitic Citizens Railcard scheme – 2,000 from the town of Szolnoc (where he was on the town council) benefited.
Unfortunately, he had to flee to Germany in case the nasty Red Army got him …
“Uncharged is not the same as innocent…” – the universal rallying cry of the lynch mob.
Hope your first in line then cretin.
“You are” not “your” if you do wish to insult my intelligence.
tory boys never grow up; People are angry simply because the race card has once again been played to an obvious despicable trougher called Uddin or Uddini).
Don’t ever forget – All Animals are equal. But some Animals are more equal the others. Perfect election slogan for Labour!!
In the absence of the state justice is delivered by the lynch mob.
The state has stood aside.
Yes, but is that a true or untrue statement. If you think it untrue, please explain why.
I refer to my early statement – number 250
Since she has not, and will not be charged, she is neither innocent or guilty. She remains a suspect who has beaten the system.
Indeed, if I commit a crime and confess to it, but remain unconvicted, am I innocent. On what Uddin has said so far she has confessed to the crime for which she has not been charged.
LETS FUCKING RIOT !
Vote B&P. It’s so easy.
I am
First you have to erase the conditioning – not easy at all.
Day in, day out people here express bewilderment that so many others will, irrationally, always vote for Labour.
Yet most of those same bewildered will, irrationally, shrink back from even considering the party whose name brings an automatic modding here.
Lib/Lab/Con conditioning swallowed hook, line and sinker; and people wonder why their bellies ache.
Baroness Uddin (Labour) 11 july 2007 House of Lords
My Lords, what are the Government’s plans in relation to what the Prime Minister said earlier today in the other place about extending the house building programme each year? Will that have any bearing on relieving overcrowding, especially in the boroughs that she mentioned?
That’s rich, Udders, coming from you.
http://englishrussia.com/?p=965
Priceless
Land administration was identified as the next most corrupt sector across the region, where in Pakistan, 100% of respondents who have dealt with the land administration authorities reported corruption; in Sri Lanka this figure was 98%.
Land administration was somewhat less corrupt in Bangladesh (73% of users reported corruption), India (47% of users), and Nepal (17% of users). Clearly, bribes are a heavy financial burden on South Asian households, both due to the high frequency of bribes and to the large sums paid. More than half of the users of public hospitals in Bangladesh reported that they had paid a bribe to access a service, which averaged out to Bangladesh Taka 1,847, which is equivalent to (US$33). In Pakistan, 92% of households that had experience with public education reported having to pay bribes; the average amount paid was PKR 4,811 (US$86).
That gets to the nub.
These Asian imports McLiebour is so found of importing, come with a load of cultural baggage.
The result can be seen all around us, the Udderly Disgraceful Tribe of Tottering Hamlets, a prime example.
As has been stated previously, Uddin may not be charged with a crime, as the HOL definition of main residence was left vague with intent , no doubt. She is still guilty in the court of public opinion though. She should be hanged by her piggy neck until her ermine squeaks!
Gott und himmel das fucking Uddin who does she think she is a fucking j*ew
Non prosecution of Baroness Uddin – it’s the right thing to do.
That something called a house of Lords exists in a supposed democracy is nothing short of disgusting. The disease of class divisions will never end unti the core it attacked: vested and hereditary priviledge. That people actually walk around today in Britain calling themselves Lord and Baroness is obscene. What century are we in? Britain is a dirty, shifty, shabby country riddled with corruptions and sleaze.
Democracy = Oligarchy Check
What we have Check
Don’t want to get too nitpicky here but I understand that the CPS dropped the case on the basis of a recent pronouncement by some Lord’s oik that Peers can designate a main residence provided they look in its general direction periodically.
OK [?] from now on, but not beforehand, surely? She has to be judged on the rules at the time, not a rethink.
That N*ick G*riffen is starting to look like a nice man
Need to do 2 things:
1. Make public life utterly unbearable for her.
2. Lay the blame at the door of Brown and the empire of the former snout-trough speaker Martin.
i think you mean ‘udderly’
I have a cunning plan. I’m not going to pay my Council Tax this year as I only stay at my Council Tax address 358 evenings per year. My main residence is actually a holiday cottage I rent on Guernsey for a week each August.
Do you think I’ll get away with it?
I’d ask my solicitor to advise you but I just shot him.
I spend one day a month with my mistress at her house. My wife will be upset when I tell her it is my main residence.
“Going forward, not prosecuting Baroness Uddin is the right thing to do for hard-working families”
It is b’cos I is Effnic
Arlzo – b’cos I is worf it
Arlzo – b’cos the system made me do it.
Mr Prezza of Scott and other Noo_Lie_Bore Toffs, also Wimmin, says:
Thas roight – it’s cos she iz worf it.
Mr Prezza of Scott, a Noo_Lie_Bore Illumination says:
Someone mentions tits?
I’m a tit man meself.
Anyone got a pie . . ? . . . pasty . . ? . . . . sandwich . . ? . . . anything . . ?
‘ello, Prezza darlin’ – got the time for another quckie?
Serious question.
What is the difference between Lord Hanningfield and this Uddin woman
Colour
Ethnic origin.
But the outcome will be the same for both of them. No conviction, no sanction; carry on troughing.
Anyone for a hung House of Lords?
Don’t want to waste the piano wire if we are not going to need it for the HoC.
I have to pay for my residence. Is it coz I’s white?
Dave
if you don’t have the balls for a refereendum this would be a vote winning policy
in stead of persecuting “bankers” promise extremely punitive retrospective legislation for thieving MPs, absurd thieving foreign “Lords” and “Ladies”, the FSA Tresury and Chancellor for debasing the currency, Gordon and Tony for sending British troops ill equipped to do the bidding of foreigners, oh yes, and, er every individual implicated in Lisbon Treaty treason.
the court of public opinion executed Charles I for treason. Now it’s Tony, Gordon and Peter’s turn. And to make it fiscally neutral put it on pay per view
Why did anyone expect Uddin to be charged, she is a Muslim therefore she answers only to one of the 85 Courts Labour has setup.
Plus Labour have and need the Muslim vote in the bag.
Of course Lord Ahmed my well have threatened once again to have 10,000 Muslims ranting outside the Houses Parliament, as they do.
Pownall is a corrupt lying twat. So he defines a main residence as somewhere you spend one day a month. Is he fucking taking the piss? It’s obviously a definition meant to whitewash all the thieving toerags who’ve been embezzling the taxpayer for years. Now that the shit’s hit the fan and the CPS say that’s why they can’t prosecute Uddin, he says it’s not a “legal” definition. What a complete and utter waste of skin.
I spend one day a month with my mistress at her house. My wife will be upset to hear that is my main residence.
It’s not over yet.
The filth calling themselves, ‘House of Lords authorities’, who came up with the rule that peers had to spend just one day a month in a property to claim it as their main home are clearly guilty of:
1. Aiding and abetting theft from taxpayers via fraud by the criminal scum in the Lords.
2. Misfeasance: The one-day-a-month rule is illogical, dishonest, deceitful, underhand, and clearly crafted to allow the filth in the House of Lords thieve from taxpayers with fraudulent expense claims.
3. Nonfeasance: Oviously the filth calling themselves, ‘House of Lords authorities’, knew without question, that the scum in the Lords were submitting fraudulent claims to thieve off taxpayers prior to the one-day-a-month rule being rushed into place to facilitate thieving by the scum in the Lords, and did nothing about it.
There is scope for a criminal complaint, civil proceedings for the torts, and a judicial revue.
We should not let the filthy trash in the public sector (‘House of Lords authorities’) and the vile thieving scum in the House of Lords, get away with this.
The Uddin pig Hunt has a palace in Bangladesh (built with money thieved off British taxpayers). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6301734.ece
I hate this tokenism with blacks in politics. Look at the retarded corrupt filth ‘Baroness Scotland’, and all the other retarded corrupt blacks trash put in place to garner votes. They have no qualifications, no ability, no skills, and are just put in office to get votes from fast breeding blacks in Britain.
Kier Starmer reckoned it was not possible to prove Uddin had broken the one day a month rule. Just how hard can that be, and, since Uddin is the one making the claim, should she not have to prove that she has complied with the rule. Could they not have brought charges anyway and left it to the jury to decide?
Private prosecution out of the question?
Re’ the appearance of the four scumbags in court today, does anyone know if they were to have their wish, and be dealt with by the HoC, does the HoC have the power to hand out jail time? What is the most severe sanction the HoC can hand out?
Ive done very well for Gordon.Christine Pratt kept quiet what about Baroness Scotlands cleaner.Knighted please.
It’s just because I’m a positive discrimination Muslim effnik on the fiddle init?
Free rein.
How the hell can the CPS say they dont think they could get a conviction?
If they took her to court, she would have to swear an oath.
How could she say that she was not given a definition of the rules relating to what is a main residence.
She is a barroness,surely she should know that a property which you might
only visit once a month, is not realy your main home.
I would like to see her convince a Jury otherwise.
I assume the CPS are terrified of a claim oif racism from the female in question or they are now deliberately biased supporting graft and corruption among minorities.
Surely its time that ” Rackspace, 2 Longwalk Road, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UB11 1BA” was discouraged from hosting the Labour werb site.
Dirty, thieving, curry smelling, gypo, bitch.
Hang the bitch!
Some or you lot are barking up the wrong tree. This scandal has very little to do with ‘Asians’ or another corrupt Asian politician getting away with fraud and theft. That’s just the froth. It’s the means by which Uddin has been able to get away with ripping off our money -so far as least- that matters.
In this regard, this scandal has everything to do with an incompetent and corrupt champagne socialist Labour establishment using their placemen and women to pervert the administration of the criminal law so as to prevent the wider body corrupt and thieving politicians from having to face justice before the courts (a jury of ordinary folks) for their criminal acts.
On the one hand we are told theft is theft, and for that reason the defence of Parliamentary privilege does not extend to the 3 (expendable?) troughing MPs who came up before the beak this week. And quite right too.
Yet in the case of Uddin the DPP is now saying that because the House of Lords authorities had lax main residence rules the case cannot proceed, notwithstanding the clear evidence that Uddin clearly did not live at the premises for which she had trousered pubic money. However, the HoL authorities have now shot the DPP’s fox by Pownall stating that the residence expenses rules he instituted were for internal administrative guidance only and not intended to supplant the criminal law, resulting in the DPP frantically fuming at the HoL authorities. Surely this is a game changer; on the facts alone the DPP will have to open the case again sooner or later. After all, would there be a greater than 50% ‘prospect of a successful conviction’ if the facts of the Uddin case were tested before a jury of ordinary men and women? 99.99 more likely…
The Lords should be truly ashamed, I am sure there must be many of them that are astonished and genuinely sorry that the greed and dishonesty of some of their number has brought their house into such disrepute.
Can they really be this feeble?
[...] + + + Baroness Uddin – No Charges + + + [...]
What’s the difference between a criminal and a politician? a criminal hides from the law, a politician hides behind the law …