March 1st, 2010

Stat-Porn for February

Almost forgot to do the numbers for the short month of February: 1,576,691 page views from 914,466 visits by 166,205 visitors plus an additional 890,571 views via feed readers.  So a total just short of two and half million page views…


5 Comments

  1. 1
    ZaNew Labour raped Millbank troll on this blog says:

    Andrew Rawnsley:

    Rawnsley states that the cabinet secretary was so concerned about Brown’s treatment of staff that he had to give Brown a “pep talk”. Rawnsley does not say O’Donnell had to conduct a formal investigation. Instead he said O’Donnell had “made inquiries” into whether a secretary had been turfed out of her chair by Brown for “not typing fast enough”. Rawnsley said: “I do not say he launched some ‘formal inquiry’, which would be an extraordinary thing for the cabinet secretary. I have no evidence of that. I say he made his own investigations and he gave a warning, a verbal warning, to the prime minister about his conduct and I am absolutely confident that happened – 100% sure,” he told Sky News. “I was particularly careful in this area because it’s obviously a very sensitive area to be sure that this wasn’t gossip or hearsay or tittle-tattle. The sources were 24-carat – not third-hand or second-hand – first-hand sources.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/23/brown-bullying-claims-allegations-non-denials

    • 2
      50 Calibre says:

      I believe Rawnsley’s account of events in the bunker.

      I do not believe any of the crap coming out of No 10 in defence of the Bully in Chief.

      QED

  2. 3
    Damp Rag says:

    The only chance you’ll have to vote Herman Van Rompuy:

    http://www.westbournemouthukip.com/local/ukiplocal.shtml

  3. 4
    Observant says:

    well played Guido

  4. 5
    david says:

    Your esteemed columnist adopts the nomenclature: ‘Thick as Thieves’.

    This could be considered a middlingly unpleasant libel of Thieves – most of whom I have found to be surprisingly intelligent.

    Having had the pleasure of the company of ‘Thick as Thieves in these columns over many delightful months, might we venture that he adopts the slightly more appropriate: ‘Not distinctly articulate’.

    Some dictionary definitions make my point:

    Thick
    composed of or containing objects, particles, etc., close together; dense: a thick fog; a thick forest.
    Thick
    not distinctly articulated: The patient’s speech is still quite thick.
    Thick
    mentally slow; stupid; dull.
    Thick
    disagreeably excessive or exaggerated: They thought it a bit thick when he called himself a genius.
    Thick
    in a manner to produce something thick: Slice the cheese thick.
    Thick
    lay it on thick, Informal. to praise excessively; flatter: He’s laying it on thick because he wants you to do him a favor.
    Thick
    having relatively great extent from one surface or side to the opposite; not thin: a thick slice.
    Thick
    measured, as specified, between opposite surfaces, from top to bottom, or in a direction perpendicular to that of the length and breadth; (of a solid having three general dimensions) measured across its smallest dimension: a board one inch thick.



The Iranian Model is Hitler | Lawrence J. Haas
No.10′s Andrew Cooper Should Look at this Poll | Douglas Carswell
Livingstone Has Form on Homophobia | ConservativeHome
Investors HBack Over RBS Meddling | CityAM
Riddled With It | Pink News
I Went Mad in the Seventies | Ken
Guy Newsroom Splits | Indy
Polly’s Voodoo Polling | UK Polling Report
Labour SpAd Backs the Bill | Mark Wallace
Guido Goes for the Lobby | Press Gazette

Previously Seen


Peter Botting


Max Clifford says…

“Most people want to read nasty things about people, not nice things.”



DisgustedOfMitcham2 says:

Maybe if they really wanted to “decontaminate the Labour brand” with business people, they shouldn’t have totally buggered up the economy?

Just a thought.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives








RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads