January 26th, 2010

GMTV (Guido Morning TV) : Who Got It Wrong?


168 Comments

  1. 1
    Wrong Wrong Wrong on everything says:

    The people who voted Labour in 1997 got it wrong.

    • 13
      Steve Expat says:

      Officical Growth figure 0.1%
      Finally the “official” recession finishes – for this quarter anyway!

      • 17
        Rounding up a very very small number says:

        0.1% – I bet you a million pounds the real figure is 0.01% rounded up to 0.1%.

        This is simply pathetic – a typical Moron Brown happening.

        • 27
          Playing with numbers says:

          Channel 4 man asked the same question – the answer is they only do to one decimal point.

          I bet they do.

          “We are now out of recession” – what utter bullshit if this is going to be used as some kind success – I blame the media for following this tripe – they are a bunch of illiterate and extremely thick second grade journalists.

          • udderly 'orrible says:

            This morning Al ja beeba somnolently announces: “The UK will emerge from recession later today”!

            Yep quite so, probably about 11.04, straight after morning coffee.

            Meeja study graduates all of ‘em, bunglawallahs!

          • Scipio Africanus says:

            Transmite me sursum, Caledoni
            [Beam me up, Scotty]

            Isn’t 0.1% statistically insignificant !!!!

          • Mr Ned says:

            0.1% is statistically insignificant*

            I am wondering what happened to that old BBC chestnut, “The feelgood factor”

            Do you remember when we came out of the last tory recession (in 1993), the BBC hammered on about the ‘lack of feelgood factor’ as a substitute for an actual recession, thus making people FEEL like we were still in recession?

            I don’t hear the BBC mentioning the “feelgood factor” anymore.

            .
            .
            .
            .
            .
            .

            *Unless it is temperature rise in a discussion about global warming, or the UK coming out of recession.

          • the real story says:

            all of which means the election will be fought on who will get us out of a double dip recession since the big freeze means that this quarters ‘growth’ will be negative

            it’s the economy stewpot

          • Hugh Janus says:

            The ITN Lunchtime News appeared to be the fairest of the lot – unlike the Beeb who seemed to think that the Second Coming was here.

        • 70
          statechaos says:

          Just listened to the Chief Economist at the ONS who produce these figures and this is just the first estimate which could be revised up or DOWN by up to 0.2%! A very fragile basis on which to claim we are out of recession.

        • 154
          Ian Academic says:

          Will only take 50 (approx) quarters at this growth rate to be back where we were before the recession.

      • 20
        Just saying says:

        ONS man stressed it was only their initial assessment

        • 22
          Steve Expat says:

          and reckon it’s as likely to go down as up when it’s revised. Don’t you just love civil servants that won’t tow the Party’s line?

        • 49
          This may help things along says:

          I am sure a knighthood would help influence his view…….

        • 71
          GORDIMODO says:

          Lie-Bore pay very well for “Initial Assessment’s”

      • 60
        Grumpy Old Man says:

        Will this figure be “adjusted” before the GE?

      • 104

        a 0% growth is still growth in Gordon’s world.
        Guido, run that 0% increase PMQ’s again.

    • 19
      No excuse for voting Labour this time - they HAVE to go says:

      I can understand people voting Labour in 1997. After 18 years of the Tories and 5 years of the troubled Major government coupled with “Black Wednesday” I can understand that.I can also understand people voting for Labour in 2001. But the watershed has to be the 2005 election.We had just been involved in a disastrous ongoing possibly illegal war by Bliar in Iraq with dubious reasons given by him to the electorate and Parliament for the Uk involvement(this was widely known even then). We knew that he and Brown had had a very difficult relationship and that Brown has obstructed Blair’s reforms and that he was plotting to replace Blair soon after the election and the signs were there that Blair would not fight the next election. People should have realised,certainly some in the know within the media etc knew what a disaster Brown would be and that he had made mistakes in his time at the Treasury for which we are paying for now. And still people re-elected Labour although in fairness the Tories in 2005 were unelectable, the LibDems taking a lot of their vote on the back of their opposition to the Iraq War and most people felt better off on the illusion of Brown’s Credit Boom and reckless encouragement of the bank’s to lend and for consumers to overborrow on credit falsely inflating our economy which made us more susceptible than others when the crash came. So Labour won in 2005 although they did not get the most of the popular vote BUT there can be absolutely no reason to re-elect Labour for a fourth term. They have failed and are no longer capable of taking the country out of the mess that Brown has for the most part created.

      • 102

        Good case, well made. Vote Blair, get Brown.
        Very many people thought that that was a good idea. But anyone who had seen the disappearer Brown knew this would be a big mistake.

        Now everyone knows. No more excuses. Like a rotten infected tooth just one more heave and its out.

      • 140
        Glaswegian says:

        I entirely sympathise with your view, No 19, but the Tories must rouse themselves from their torpor, or a hung parliament will ensue. If Cameron presumes that he will get a shoo-in because Brown is useless, he may not get enough of the swing vote to make a decent majority.
        So far the Conservative campaign has been wish washy,despite the obvious failings of Brown and his substandard team. I wish I could get more enthusiastic about Cameron’s approach.

    • 68
      Edward Devoy says:

      Who would you trust with your future prosperity, all the politicians of all parties promise we the people a decade of austerity and downright poverty.
      Take control of your future and make a better future for your children by demanding True Democracy. Give yourself the power.
      Check out http://www.gopetition.com “True Democracy in the UK”

    • 75
      alex says:

      Have you just worked that out.

    • 78
      Up sh1t creek says:

      £200bn of monopoly money printed (figure does not include the other off balance sheet money printing).

      £178bn borrowing for 2009-10

      £200bn projected borrowing for 2010-11

      Unemployment still going up

      Interest rates will be forced up

      Income tax going up (aka National Insurance)

      Still, New Labour will take the 0.1% fiddled growth stats from the ONS, and use the tag line “we got you out of recession” for all it’s worth, just watch today’s BBC news, they are already scrambling around for the One O’clock news to make New Labour look good.

      • 79
        Up sh1t creek says:

        Forgot to mention, it is scandalous that the public sector grew 0.2%. That’s where all the monopoly money is being used, to buy off New Labour votes.

        The public sector does not _grow_ anything in GDP, the public sector sucks money out of the economy.

    • 114
      Osama the Nazarene says:

      True. They got it very badly wrong and I was among them I am ashamed to admit it. mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

      Why is Ms Nomates rocking backwards and forwards like someone five times her age? She needs some media training.

    • 153
      Barnabus Scudamore says:

      Couldn’t agree more !

      Well said !

  2. 2
    GORDIMODO says:

    Good morning !

  3. 3
    concrete pump says:

    Brown looks like he’s just smelled Darling’s fart.

  4. 4
    Smash Labour says:

    But the BBC are bigging up McBust. Radio5 presenter just stated “cutting public spending now would be a mistake”

    Of course it is a mistake, especially if you lot don’t vote Labour at the next election as the BBC demands.

  5. 5
    Anonymous says:

    Tory bear needs to iron his shirt rather than just taking it brand new out of the pack.

  6. 6
    Number 7 says:

    Brilliant Guido – I like the ending!!!!!!

  7. 8
    GORDIMODO says:

    That Emily Nomates Does it for me !
    She is so well blessed
    Throw that Tweed jacket in the bin
    Public School hockey uniform only from now on !

  8. 9
    End of the Recession Party says:

    All on expenses RSVP.

    Vote for the End of the Recession Party

  9. 10
    Bruce Bellend says:

    Is that the end of the bust that came after the boom, that ended, the end of boom and bust?

  10. 11
    Brown's Buggered Britain says:

    Maybe Gordon was so busy saving the world, he didn’t have time to save us?

  11. 12
    Prodicus says:

    Yup. Good stuff. More, please.

  12. 15
    Postal Vote says:

    Numbers just out: 0.1% growth, if you want to call it growth

    Election’s starting to look done deal …

    … but be wary of those postal votes!

    • 23
      Postal Vote says:

      the 0.1% refers to growth of Q4 2009 on Q3 2009, so it is very unimpressive as it includes:
      -back to school, let’s get business going again period
      -christmas shopping

      May 6 election looking more likely than bobastic build-up from today’s ‘growth’ news to a March election

      • 28
        Postal Vote says:

        0.1% can be 0.06% rounded!

        • 46
          jgm2 says:

          Can be 0.05% rounded up.

          • A numbers game says:

            Brown would round up -10% to +0.1% if he was allowed to.

            After all,this is the wanker who declared growth of 0%.

            There has never been a politician who tells so many lies,who defrauds a country and ruins it’s economy as much as this evil Gordon Brown has done.

            Why can’t his henchman push him out and we can get an election?

        • 52
          Postal Vote says:

          ha, government services of 0.2% contributed to total services growth of 0.1%

          and there was also the car scrappage scheme

          wooh, what a growth

        • 67
          foureyedenglishgenius says:

          0.1% can be .0001% rounded up in NuLabourSpeak!

      • 32
        genghiz the kahn says:

        vat rise, petrol price rise, food prices up, pound down, not good signs for post xmas recovery.

        • 56
          0.1% to decline in next quarter says:

          January and February also a very bad month for holiday bookings (nowadays more last minute bookings),hotel stays,conferences,restaurants etc etc.

          VAT increased,food prices rising all leading to inflation.

          We need to have another Gordon Brown economics power lecture like at yesterday’s press conference – I hear the state of netball clubs is in a pretty bad way,what are your thoughts Gordon,you fucking moron.

      • 35
        eek says:

        Plus the impact of consumer spending that was brought forward due to the increase in VAT on Jan 1st. It wouldn’t surprise me that we have 0.2% growth in Q4 2009 and -0.5% this quarter.

    • 24
      Biffo Taoiseach says:

      Ha ha! ’bout the size of Gordon’s errection when confronted with a woman.

    • 33
      End of the Recession Party says:

      Yes Labour have got the election in the bag. With 0.1% growth all our problems are over, it has only cost us £175 billion to get this incredible 0.1% growth and we are inline soon to overtake China who managed a meager 9% growth in 2009.

      Vote for the End of the Recession Party

      • 45
        GORDIMODO says:

        Well it’s much better than McBust’s Predicted 0% Growth isn’t it ?

        • 142
          Gordon's favourite Butt Plug says:

          Can someone explain to me why with Labour it takes two Quarters of negative figures. (Substantiated) But only one Quarter to come out of Recession. (Not fully confirmed by ONS, and marginal growth to say the least. Bit like a car dealership looking at only the months with high deliveries to end users due to Registration peaks. My heartfelt belief is that everything else is in place for another negative Quarter from the start of this year.

  13. 18
    FUCK OFF GORDON BROWN YOU CUNT says:

    Guido, invest in a decent microphone.
    The voice recording is worse than an Osama Bin Laden video for fuck’s sake.

    • 30
      FBI Tora Bora branch says:

      too fucking right, worse than a dead guy.

      • 44
        Prince Bandar says:

        Osama Bin Laden dead? No, that is not true.
        He is staying at my palace and I had breakfast with him this morning.

    • 83
      HEAVYMAN says:

      I already offered to record Guido et al with my sexy pro-audio gear. Indeed, I said if they couldn’t be fucked with trekking to me or paying my travel to them, I would master (polish up) the crap recordings for FREE and he never got back to me.

      He’s either an audio purist or a Caaaant. (More likely the former obviously…)
      ;)

  14. 21
    Yesmates says:

    Emily Nomates forever! What a star.

  15. 25
    genghiz the kahn says:

    where are the fawning labourites from gmtv?

    collecting p45s at long last…

  16. 26
    GORDIMODO says:

    At that rate we should be out of recession by 2175 can’t wait !
    Just give me my fucking pension back you wankers !

  17. 29
    Guido's former Flatmate says:

    I recognise that sofa….

  18. 31
    labour stole my pension says:

    Guardian headlines “tories loosing the class war”
    read the blogs never read so many vile comments on the Tories, its all there fault they eat babies,bla,bla.bla
    What fucking world have these people been living in for the past 12 years

    • 63
      concrete pump says:

      Guardian readers live in their own deluded bubble of bollocks.

      Every night, before they go to bed, they have to convince themselves that everything they said that day was correct.

      • 98
        Mr Ned says:

        Good job that there are only a dozen of them all posting under false names.

      • 164
        City of Vice says:

        The Guardian is desperately censoring both comments and commentators these days to try and give the impression that there is less opposition to Labour than actually exists.

        Suffice to say, I got banned for pointing out that they and their ilk are deluded champagne socialists incompetents and hypocrites.

        Hopefully one of the first tasks of the incoming Tory government will be to by pass the Labour government’s not so indirect subsidy to the Guardian’s finances by taking public appointments adverts out of that expensive lefty rag and putting them online instead.

  19. 34
    G Eagle Esq says:

    Dontcha yer just lerve that Hyaena=Dog

  20. 38
    A Straightforward Request says:

    If Emily Nomates gets her apples out I will vote Tory.
    My word is my bond.

    • 50
      GORDIMODO says:

      Well thats two votes they will get from here !

      • 77
        A Straightforward Request says:

        We should be called the SHWING vote.
        Come on Emily, the Conservatives need every single vote to get a majority.
        Unbutton and think of England.
        Your country needs those apples.

    • 99
      Mr Ned says:

      not me, It would take some real policies that put this country first, for a change, to get me voting tory.

      However, I would still like to see her tits. (fuck all that calling them apples, bollocks! What are you? 12?)

      If Emily gets her top bollocks out and shows off her cock park, then I’ll, er, well I’ll, um… Seeing tits does not make me want to vote, let’s put it that way, so if, she got her tits out I would probably just have a wank actually.

  21. 39
    Anonymous says:

    How can we be out of recession when people are still losing their jobs?

    Answer me that one, Gordon!

    • 48
      Gordon Brown says:

      I like round numbers. There are 100 days to the next election.

      • 87
        Steve Expat says:

        There are 92 days to the next recession.

        Don’t you think you’d better have the election before the Q1 figures come out?

        • 101
          Mr Ned says:

          Nope, a recession is TWO consecutive quarters of “negative growth”, so we cannot re-enter recession until June at the earliest, even IF every month from now until then shows the economy shrinking by 10% per month.

          • Steve Expat says:

            I know, was being ever so slightly facecious.

            If this quarter gets revised down though, we never came out in the first place.

            Point still stands that if the election is on May 6th, that’s one week after the Q1 figures come out – and if they’re negative Broon is even more of a dead man walking than he is now…

            I’ve got March 25th in my diary, that lets the govt off having to hold a Budget too…

  22. 41
    The Beast of Clerkenwell says:

    i could show you all manner of abandoned construction projects in london
    In desiarble areas on one rd there are two abadoned houses that would have easily gone for 10 mill, xontractors have fucked off months ago and huge sights in central london(acres big) abandoned for over a year
    Out of reccession my arse

    • 62
      GORDIMODO says:

      Up Norff it’s the same all sites shut down in october 2008
      and ive only seen two that have reopened
      McBust promised Billions to keep the construction industry going
      where is it ?
      i am in building myself
      last year was quiet
      This year ,well
      why do you think i’m sat here ?

      • 72
        Gordon 'digger' Brown says:

        look mate, I only construct marxist fantasies not real stuff.

      • 88
        Jan says:

        Talking of Up Norff,did anybody see Ginger Blears on Newsnight last night? Apparently the locals in Salford are not happy at having to sell their Coronation Street-type houses for £8,000 only to be moved into s….t council flats nearby only to see same £8,000 done-up and sold for £150,000. Blears film taken some years ago.She promised them the earth..Hahaha. The houses that have been renovated looked good but the new build flats/townhouses looked really manky.I mean a design which might look good say in a trendy area of wherever using top-class cedar cladding etc (you know the type used on Grand Designs) does not in any way compare to inferior materials of say plywood cladding used on housing in Salford. Actually you see these modern designs all over London built by the local authorities (especially in Lambeth) and within a few weeks bright,funky,brand new design townhouses look utter crap. They interviewed the property developer.he looked like a right plonkeur.Also the old type councillor who has obviously been a councillor in Salford for a 100 years.Patronising,superior old git.Didn’t like it when the locals said they wanted their old houses back.

        • 135
          sockpuppet #4 says:

          The point they miss is that an £8000 house in Salford is worth a lot more when there aren’t any locals living on the street.

    • 115
      The Beast of Clerkenwell says:

      Fucking hell
      Even by my standards that was a fine example of how NOT to spell.

  23. 43
    Anonymous says:

    I really fancy that girl in the white shirt.
    The way she leans forward into the camera…

    Anybody got her number?

  24. 53
  25. 54
    concrete pump says:

    O/T

    Did anyone see Suzannah Reid on beeb this am, above the knee skirt, found it quite hard to prevent line of sight.

    Beeb put a banner across the screen for ages, Suzannah carefully placed a mug of coffee in front of her knees.

    Phwoooooaaaaaarrrr!

  26. 55
    ME says:

    ALL I CAN THINK ABOUT IS WHICH WEB SITE SHOULD I LOOK AT TO GIVE ME THE BEST CHANCE OF FINDING A WOMAN TO TAKE TO DINNER TONIGHT. TABLE BOOKED IN NAYLAND ,ESSEX,
    I WANT TO PUT SOMETHING BACK INTO THE ECOMOMY AND I NEED TO PUT SOMETHING IN++++++++++++++++++? SOCIAL SERVICES, IF YOU STILL EXIST, PLEASE HELP. OR EMILY NOMATES, HELP, HELP.

  27. 57
  28. 58
    Anonymous says:

    Shouldn’t your tag read Doom and Bust?

  29. 59
    rparker says:

    even handed and the beeb forget it

  30. 61
    ME TEEDOFF AND NEARLY OUT OF CONTROL says:

    HELP PLEASE.
    IF THINGS GET ROUGH ILL TAKE HARRICORT HARPER TO THE FARM.

    BUT SURELY I HAVNT BEEN THAT BAD!!!

  31. 64
    worker drone says:

    great stuff, i am enjoying the several levels of irony and satire that guy tv is broadcasting.

    please keep it up as i am really enjoying the guy news weekly shows and the intermittent parodies like this. great.

  32. 66
    End of the Recession Party says:

    Please sir if this mind-boggling growth figure of 0.1% is such good news, why did the pound and FTSE fall when it’s announcement was made.

    Even “Made in England” labels are now made in China who could only manage a miserly 9% growth figure in 2009, only 90 times our vote winning 0.1% growth.

    Vote for the End of the Recession Party, this incredible election winning news is 2 more votes in the bag , my old English sheepdog and my vote.

  33. 81
    The Beast of Clerkenwell says:

    Can you get Harry to be filmed topless
    He has a great pair of tits

  34. 82

    GOD!!! She turns me on SO MUCH with her impeccable delivery, model perfect features and rebellious joi de vivre, – FHWOOAAAARRR!!!!!!

    It’s no wonder Guy News is so popular….take me Emily, I’m all yours!

    • 96
      English Liberation Front says:

      Emily is a star! She was turning on the wow factor in that white blouse this morning.

      Guido – let’s see more of Emily in the future – a real tonic for those of us blighted by Brown!

    • 122
      Top Quality! and definitely not the scragends that wouldn't get into a student review says:

      How dare these trolls laugh at this and say this shambolic pair of twats that could only ever get youtube hits from partisan political shitmunchers

      This is real quality & shows that a bright future in youtube entertainment beckons

      Look out piss swallowing monkey! your time is up sneezing panda!
      here come the riotously funny Gay News duo to smash all youtube records

    • 126
      Mr Ned says:

      She makes me feel all generous. I have a strong desire to bestow a pearl necklace about her delicate, feminine neck.

  35. 84
    Up sh1t creek says:

    Well I would love to wake up to Emily Nomates every morning, but preferably not in a television set. :)

  36. 85
    Jimmy says:

    I suppose two funny ones in a row was too much to hope for.

  37. 86
    mellors says:

    A nice brace you’ve managed to smuggle in under your hacking jacket Emmers.

  38. 90
    Steve Expat says:

    Guido, surely all this ‘recession ending’ bollocks is just spin, to take attention away from the Foreign Office’s lawyer telling Chilcot that there was no way the Iraq war was legal?

  39. 91
    Is it any wonder there is no longer any respect for the Boys in blue? says:

    anti-terror police stop children’s TV stars… for carrying glittery hairdryers

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246151/Now-anti-terror-police-stop-childrens-TV-stars–carrying-HAIRDRYERS.html

    • 93
      Mr Plum says:

      That must have put the wind up them

    • 97
      sockpuppet #4 says:

      ‘We were stopped, not arrested, but they had to say “we are holding you under the Anti-Terrorism Act because you’re running around in flak jackets’

      So they were arsing about, and the police asked them what they were up to.

  40. 92
    tarquin says:

    Keep your grubby little paws off my bird, Tory Bear.

  41. 94
    Roger Daley says:

    Al Megrahy has done OK – He has had a 150% increase in his last life expectancy assessment + counting.

  42. 95
    British Engineer says:

    Greetings Guido,

    OT, but:

    You may find this interesting – The Engineer is a magazine & website dealing with cutting edge engineering.

    They have a story in this months magazine about failing & hackable RFID tags in bio metric e-passports:

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/rfid-defect-spotted-in-e-passports/1000663.article

    Birmingham University discovered that the tags respond to any radio frequency – allowing anyone with a reader to nick the salient info from the e-passport.

    More from our “you could not make it up” correspondent later.
    Another New Labour IT success story in the offing.

    • 120
      sockpuppet #4 says:

      “salient information” ? I don’t get that from the article.
      Isn’t it that one can detect a passport “signature” – something that isn’t clearely related to a name, passport number or any other information.

      On the upside you could make a machine that finds your passport for you.

      • 131
        Mr Ned says:

        The “signature”? It’s an encypted code, from which your personal details CAN be decrypted and copied very easily.

        I have seen a video of a guy driving around in a car doing drive-by copies of passports. It is a piece of piss.

        • 143
          sockpuppet #4 says:

          The article doesn’t mention that.

          A two minute google doesn’t actually tell me what sort of info one can get directly from the stuff in the RFID tag.

          • anon says:

            You are obviously not versed in the technology of RFID.

            What ever is on the chip can be read remotely – that is the point.

            There are no safe guards or failsafes in place to counter the theft of the information from someone in close proximity to you.

            Trolling and spinning for kicks, or is it a profession?

          • sockpuppet #4 says:

            Being lectured by an “anon”.

            Its not trolling or spinning, its trying to figure out exactly what the problem is and isn’t.

            The article mentions nothing of cloning, and what that entails.

            “no safe guards” – bollocks.
            Whats “Basic Access Control”

  43. 103
    Anonymous says:

    The economy rose 0.1% in Q4 2009 against Q3? Wow.

    The figures for the first three quarters of the recession were displayed this morning, something like 0.9%, 1.7%, 2.5% (all negative, obviously). So by my calculation, based on those three quarters alone, the country is 1/50th of the wat back to where we were in 2008. Call it 12 and a half years to recover. Underwhelming.

    I am sure someone with better information will be able to add in the missing quarters.

  44. 106
  45. 109
    caesars wife (aboard the dustcart) says:

    Are you begging to agree guido E economy has inherent problems and is perhaps robbing people of the freedoms of work ??

    The structure is imbalanced , if we rely on a service sector that is going to need cuts where will the growth come from to keep the debt differential payable ??

    ruinomics ! it started in 1997

    • 125
      Sir Everard Digby says:

      Indeed -I’m thinking the best answer is that of my ancestor -hire an ex soldier to set off multiple gunpowder barrels under Parliament.Only this time do the job properly.

      I call it explosive Quantative Easing

  46. 110
    Hooray for Dave! He inherits a double dip recession that he will get us out of says:

    Good old Dave has all the answers and with the surefooted brilliance of his widely admired shadow chancellor Osborne he’s turn this whole recession nonsense around in a jiffy.

    Things can only get better.

  47. 116
    bofl says:

    8million+ with no economic output………

    £225 billion printed………..

    how much junk did the boe buy that will never be repaid?

    more jobs to be ‘offshored’………

    cuts in defence+nhs………..

    the future is brown.
    shit.

  48. 118
    jgm2 says:

    Fucking hell. When I was making my point about 300bn quid buying 0.1% of growth (ie 1bn quid) I was assuming that 0.1% of growth was a percentage of the annual GDP.

    But now it looks like it’s a percentage of the previous quarters GDP.

    We have squandered 300 billion quid to increase last quarters GDP by 300 million quid. A one part in a thousand return.

    So Cameron tomorrow should be taking Brown apart. As I’ve said before that 300bn quid is almost 10,000 quid for every man woman and child in the UK. It is more like 8,000 quid.

    For 8,000 quid you could buy a nice little family car. Brand new. And with the ‘growth’ you could fill it with eight quids worth of petrol. Which wouldn’t be enough to get most of those fucking Labour MPs back to their fucking constituencies.

    That is how fucked the economy is.

    This recession isn’t over. This recession hasn’t even got started.

    • 128
      bofl says:

      most of the money has been GIVEN to uk and foriegn banks……..

      they don’t want to lend it to anyone-there is a recession on!

      so they have invested it in bonds and equities……..

      that is why the stock market has had a massive bull run and traders are now expecting huge bonuses………..

      the same thing happened in the late 80′s when the u.s thrifts were in trouble)building societies)

      yet our history scholar and ‘iron’ chancellor just steamed in………
      arrogant and very very stupid……

      still it’s not his money and he might get a few quid for sarah on the streets of eastern europe?

      • 139
        Mr Ned says:

        The funny thing is, If labour had taken a trillion pounds of our future tax reciepts and spent the same money on paying off working people’s mortgages, then the economy would be booming, as people willingly and happily spend more of their newly available income on local services (car valeting, getting a cleaner in, getting their hair done more often, etc…) and another upside (for labour) would have been that labour would have been looking at a massive landslide victory at the election.

        Instead, the Government have taken trillions of pounds of our future incomes and given it to the banks to lend back to us at interest. Even then the banks are not lending. They are passing it around their elite banking trader pals for bumper bonuses instead.

        People tell me that labour cares for the poor and the working classes. If that was the case, then when given the option of spending a trillion pounds, they had a choice of giving that money to the banks via our mortgage accounts, or giving it directly. So what did they do? Give to the poor? Or the rich?

        Then they should have INCLUDED the poor and the workers in that hand out, instead they only BILLED them for it!

        If I was looking at having to pay a trillion to the bankers, I would have done so via the nation’s mortgage accounts. Then the banker’s get their money (eventually) and we, the people, don’t have to pay all that back again TWICE PLUS INTEREST! (once to the government in tax and again, plus interest, to the banks) With all that extra money sloshing around, there would be plenty of room to put VAT up to get the deficit back down.

        Labour are cruel incompetent fuckwits.

        • 147
          Steve Expat says:

          If labour had taken a trillion pounds of our future tax reciepts and spent the same money on paying off working people’s mortgages,

          Superb idea, but almost certainly illegal under EU law.

    • 134
      Mr Plum says:

      The 300 billion has never been about helping us out of recession it has been about deferring the pain until after the election and saving Browns neck

      • 146
        Steve Expat says:

        So true. It’s all been politics for at least the last 6 months, as the government try so desparately to hide from the electorate just how fucked up the economy actually is.

        • 148
          jgm2 says:

          It’s been politics since day one with these arseholes. Unfortunately.

          But if we’re talking about this recession then it has been politics since ‘Deep Throat’ at the treasury was whispering into Robert Peston’s ear over Northern Rock. They have been shitting broken glass since October 2007 that the truth about how fucked the UK economy is would percolate into the wider consciousness. It is only their total control of the BBC that has managed to allow them to stagger this close to an election without the electorate taking to the street and tearing them to pieces.

          This economy is so fucked and instead of trying to fix it they have spent two years and 300bn quid trying to kid on that all we need to solve a debt crisis is…. lots more debt.

          We have just wasted two years and 300bn quid. For no other reason than so that Brown can sit in the cheap seats taking cheap shots while somebody has to take some tough adult decisions.

  49. 121
    bofl says:

    even gordies gay fantasy-the messiah- is having to cut:

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AP-sources-Obama-to-seek-apf-4070277484.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=2&asset=&ccode=

    add to that the end of subsidies has caused a downturn again in the u.s property market……….

    and we will follow………as our economy is built on sand.

    • 127
      Sir William Waad says:

      Obama looks older, greyer and somehow oddly paler than when he was elected.

      • 132
        bofl says:

        you would be worried if that fat faggot mc cottage was always trying to touch your cock every time you met!

  50. 123
    Sir William Waad says:

    We landowners know that if you spread too much fertiliser on the soil you get a quick, weedy growth of plants followed by eutrophication, so that nothing good will grow on the land. All you can do is leave it to recover through leaching. In public finance this over-fertilisation is called ‘quantitative easing’. You get a short-term growth of votes and long-term poisoning of the economy.

  51. 133
    Dirty engineering person says:

    The “growth” is over three months – I reckon there was a small bit of growth during october as cash finally came in from stock sales was used to bump up stock levels then another two months of declne

  52. 136
    Gatland says:

    Even NuLibore supporters can’t get it right. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/wales_politics/8479853.stm

    The chairman of the Welsh Rugby Union has apologised for using its e-mail to organise a £1,000-a-plate pre-election fundraising event for Welsh Labour.

    David Pickering put a WRU e-mail on invitations to the dinner at Cardiff’s members-only Park House Club next week.

  53. 138
    Bird Watcher says:

    Hmm, that Emily Nomates is rather a toothsome wench, methinks.

  54. 149
    Hitchcock says:

    That was you best one yet, a real good balance of politics and humour keep it up!

  55. 151
    Martin says:

    Brilliant Video Guido. I just love em.

    I get more truth from your blog, and others, than i do from the main stream media.

    You sometimes forget what the politicians have said, but thanks to you and other bloggers we remember what utter lying, spin talking idiots some of these politicians can be.

    I don’t suppose you can start a 24 hour GUY NEWS channel on Sky could you?

    I for one would watch it.

  56. 157
    Seymour says:

    Ah Emily sans jacket.

    Give her her own show Guido, you know it makes sense.

    Bikini clad doing a political weather report would be nice.

  57. 159
    Steve Expat says:

    Jimmy, the figures released today are for Q4 2009, not for a whole year, your figures are four times too optimistic.

    UK GDP PER QUARTER is about £380bn

    0.1% of £380bn is £380million – or less than a day’s government spending.

    Well worth the £50bn spending deficit and countless billions more run off the printing presses- all to achieve such a paltry ‘growth’ figure, which could yet still be ‘revised’ further downwards.

  58. 160
    Half eyed Scottish idiot says:

    Don’t worry- the GDP will grow next quarter by 0.00%

  59. 161

    Wonderful news we are out of recession, We should all rejoice… and we have the uplifting thought that the Olympics will be with us and WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT AS WELL. Seriously it is very good news that Labour can still spin a story out of disaster, speaking of which I am reminded that the stars of the Jeremy Kyle Show all have a vote and are breeding like rabbits. Truly we are all fucked with a capital PH and I don’t usually swear but that and the Chilcott revelations thuis morning its not been a good day…

  60. 165
  61. 167

    [...] GMTV (Guido Morning TV) : Who Got It Wrong? [...]

  62. 168
    Boz says:

    Is the Credit Crunch A new kind of breakfast cereal ?


Seen Elsewhere

Ed’s Constitutional Failure | ConHome
UKIP Poster Girl’s Naked Photos | Sun
Miliband’s Radical Old Labour Agenda | Fraser Nelson
Meet Team Miliband | Dan Hodges
Run Boris Run | Times
Tories Pledge to End Onshore Windfarm Subsidy | Telegraph
Labour’s Plan to Attack Part-Time Boris | Standard
Ex-Sun Hack Cleared After 582 Days on Bail | MediaGuido
11 Times Boris Denied He Would Stand for Parliament | Buzzfeed
Attacking UKIP’s Posters is Counter-Productive | Guardian
Sarkozy Tried it on With Hollande’s Ex | Times


new-advert
Guido-hot-button (1) Guido-hot-button (1)


A confused Nick Griffin says Nigel Farage is a shill for the City, forgetting that City banks want to stay in the EU:

“Farage is a snake oil salesman, but a very good one. His supposed anti-immigration stance is all smoke and mirrors, as is his carefully cultivated image as a ‘man of the people’. The truth is that UKIP is a pro-immigration party that exists to lobby for the interests of the City of London.”



Alexrod says:

It’s money innit.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Subscribe me to:






RSS




AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads