Comments on: CRU Boss Stands Aside, Queens University Blocking Data FOI

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:20:00 +0000

This is garbage. The law is that you need a license to watch live TV as it’s broadcast. They fact that the money mostly goes to the BBC is irrelevant.

By: Don Wood

Don Wood — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:26:40 +0000

Alien Abdustion Denialm is a terrible crime

By: mw

mw — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:49:23 +0000

So Phil Jones stepped down as ~~Director~~ High Priest of the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit pending an investigation. Well, if his AGW projections don't hold up, at least he knows that his legacy will live on with his groundbreaking New & Improved CRU Scientific Method. I was able to reverse engineered the East Anglia CRU Scientific Methodology from the procedures documented in the purloined e-mails and code. It is clear to me that they have built on the work of maverick chemist Theodore Hapner, who revolutionized thinking about the scientific method in 2006. Godspeed Phil Jones.

By: Budgie

Budgie — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:28:01 +0000

Don’t waste your time
These thick bastards would always rather weave some incredible paranoid conspiracy than accept the truth

Daves shit at PMQ’s ? It’s a conspiracy! Dave was shit on purpose to make sure Brown wasn’t removed
Polls not looking good for Dave? It’s a conspiracy! with all the pollsters fixing them for Labour

They are nuttier than squirrel shit around here and this is the Fox News/Turnip Taliban wing of the Tory Party where all those who find the Daily Mail a touch too intellectual gather

By: Richard Blogger

Richard Blogger — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:22:33 +0000

“mathematician Douglas J. Keenan”

Are you sure with that title “mathematician”? Have a look at his “papers” there’s very little mathematics in them. I am not even sure he could work out how to use the statistics button on my Casio calculator let alone do any meaningful statistical analysis.

Some advice to you Guido, drop him, you’ll only look silly backing someone whose mathematics skills are little more than A levels.

On the other hand, can you use your considerable investigative skills to find out who the CRU hackers are? I think you may find them very interesting, if you know what I mean…

By: bob

bob — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:36:14 +0000

““I can’t see either … being in the next [IPCC] report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!””

This is perfectly justified statement if the paper in question is rubbish and was only published due to lapse of editorial control. A lapse which eventually led to multiple editors resigning in protest. If anything the real scandal was how the paper got published in the first place.

The last part is clearly a joke by the way, noone can “redefine” peer review.

By: Budgie

Budgie — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +0000

Thank you for peer reviewing my comment!

By: I B Seldom-Lucid

I B Seldom-Lucid — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:17:31 +0000

I refer the honourable Budgie to the remarks I made a little earlier…

albeit with apologies for typos!!

It seems that CW is now exposed as a witch scientist – to the ducking stool!

By: michael fish

michael fish — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:38:07 +0000

Ricky dont stop the ranting…if the north pole ice cap melted tomorrow. the sea level would not rise an inch.

By: michael fish

michael fish — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:35:56 +0000

why is it called Greenland?. err…maybe at one time it was ice free…
check with the Vikings.