Quote of the Day
Alan Johnson says
“We are now looking at a watershed election, à la 1945, à la 1979, more so than 1997.”
Alan Johnson says
“We are now looking at a watershed election, à la 1945, à la 1979, more so than 1997.”

Labour’s Brave New Strategy - Dizzy
Mephedrone: Dealing with the Facts – ASI blog
Deficit in a Spin – City Unslicker
I Was BNP Bigot Until I Fell for My Jamaican Colleague – Mirror
Conservatives Baffled by Letwin’s Policy Pyramid – Times
Piers Morgan is a Tory – Fraser Nelson
The Bunker Bod Funded Entirely by Unite – Standard
Welcome to the e-Election – John Harris
Mad Nad: Declaring War on Scantily Clad Women - Devil’s Kitchen


Nick Clegg said…
“Charlie Whelan and Lord Ashcroft are exactly the same. One is the baron of the trade unions, and the other one is the baron of Belize. Both are bankrolling political parties, both are trying to buy seats.”

+ Crude (June)
As of 16 Mar 2010
-Gilts (Mar)
As of 26 Feb 2010
Flat – No Positions
As of 23 Feb 2010 +30.81%





He’s been on the sauce again, ‘hic’
That Johnson bloke is a clever chap isn’t he? Has he noticed that his team are looking a bit sick for the next election? Although, don’t forget that his former job gives him a certain expertise at managing the postal vote………..
Vote Labour!
Yesterdays humiliation of McSaggy at PMQs is provoking the usual panic ridden unpleasant response from the bunker goons.
Caught on the hop they wheel on self interest protecting stooges and mumble Islamophobia and government written waffle about Cameron chasing poll ratings.
How about Labours wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for Islamophobia? Robinson’s BBC blog post is rightly getting shot to bits on this plus Nick Clegg’s question that also made a fool of Brown and his followers.
Torture cover up anyone?
He really has a brain the size of a small letter.
Still at least he’s got a skill to fall back on – the rest of the student union won’t have a fucking clue when it comes to getting a real job.
If Labour ministers cut down on the hot air they keep pumping out there would be no need to hold a Copenhagen Summit!
There you are!
Does he not notice that in both 1945 and 1979 the incumbents lost