<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Labour Want to Avoid Expenses Issue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/</link>
	<description>Parliamentary plots and conspiracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-354129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-354129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big parties are all disgraced. Hasn&#039;t the time come for all the smaller parties who work on the basis of policies to join together in a single message: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pol-check.blogspot.com/2009/11/vote-for-change-dont-vote-for-them-vote.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tory, Labour and Lib Dem, I will not vote for them again!&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big parties are all disgraced. Hasn&#8217;t the time come for all the smaller parties who work on the basis of policies to join together in a single message: <a href="http://pol-check.blogspot.com/2009/11/vote-for-change-dont-vote-for-them-vote.html" rel="nofollow">Tory, Labour and Lib Dem, I will not vote for them again!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Churchill's Cattleprod</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-349797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Churchill's Cattleprod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-349797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Queer Stammer in charge we can all be truly thankful that not one member of the Labour Party will face any charges. Obviously it is all a Great Tory Plot to discredit the noble efforts of years of the like of Ramsay MacDonald, Clement Atlee and, dare I say, Kier Hardie&#039;s own efforts to bring down the establishment and lead us to true socialism in our own lifetime.

PS Neither Jack Jones (or Lord Jones, that famous communist) or Michael Foot were abject traitors to their country, their party or all that they believed in. Whoever says that is either a Tory Party Poof or another Comunist Lickspittle of te discredited Soviet Union&#039;s former KGB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Queer Stammer in charge we can all be truly thankful that not one member of the Labour Party will face any charges. Obviously it is all a Great Tory Plot to discredit the noble efforts of years of the like of Ramsay MacDonald, Clement Atlee and, dare I say, Kier Hardie&#8217;s own efforts to bring down the establishment and lead us to true socialism in our own lifetime.</p>
<p>PS Neither Jack Jones (or Lord Jones, that famous communist) or Michael Foot were abject traitors to their country, their party or all that they believed in. Whoever says that is either a Tory Party Poof or another Comunist Lickspittle of te discredited Soviet Union&#8217;s former KGB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City of Vice</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-349398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[City of Vice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-349398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. And global warming is overplayed lefty bollocks too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. And global warming is overplayed lefty bollocks too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City of Vice</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-349318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[City of Vice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-349318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Yep. Its about time the monocled, white pussy stroking Lord Mandelson said...&#039;

I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll find Mandelson stroking any kind of pussy, white or otherwise.

He&#039;s not that kind of boy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Yep. Its about time the monocled, white pussy stroking Lord Mandelson said&#8230;&#8217;<br />
I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll find Mandelson stroking any kind of pussy, white or otherwise.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not that kind of boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ferret</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-349278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ferret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-349278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Harriet Hymen is being brought to book at last!   Driving without care, Using a mobile phone whilst driving, Leaving the scene of an accident.
Took plod a long time to sort that out, let&#039;s hope she has some expenses money removed from her and a few brownie points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Harriet Hymen is being brought to book at last!   Driving without care, Using a mobile phone whilst driving, Leaving the scene of an accident.<br />
Took plod a long time to sort that out, let&#8217;s hope she has some expenses money removed from her and a few brownie points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-348735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-348735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A FULL investigation into Uddin&#039;s finances needs to be conducted. HMRC can go back up to 20 years - this seems a suitable time for her since it would cover pretty much all her time working in local government, councils, etc and her time since joining the Lords.

Of particular interest is how did she manage to fund that foreign palace?

I suggest the police also check the gas, electricity etc usage for the Kent flat at the time she claims to have been spending several nights a week there. Wouldn&#039;t it be odd if they showed nil usage? Seems like an open and shut case to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A FULL investigation into Uddin&#8217;s finances needs to be conducted. HMRC can go back up to 20 years &#8211; this seems a suitable time for her since it would cover pretty much all her time working in local government, councils, etc and her time since joining the Lords.</p>
<p>Of particular interest is how did she manage to fund that foreign palace?</p>
<p>I suggest the police also check the gas, electricity etc usage for the Kent flat at the time she claims to have been spending several nights a week there. Wouldn&#8217;t it be odd if they showed nil usage? Seems like an open and shut case to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: udderly 'orrible</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-348733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[udderly 'orrible]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-348733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another whinge from the religion of piss is it mishandjob?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another whinge from the religion of piss is it mishandjob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thick as thieves</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-348723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thick as thieves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-348723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOU DO NOT STEP IN WHEN TOP BOY IS GOING ABOUT HIS BUSINESS!
YOU NOSEY FUCKING SLAG GET BACK IN YOUR FUCKING BOX!
cheeky c&#039;unt.
never step in when top boy is attending to his business, minekiller.
you are a dimwit but you will be taught some manners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU DO NOT STEP IN WHEN TOP BOY IS GOING ABOUT HIS BUSINESS!<br />
YOU NOSEY FUCKING SLAG GET BACK IN YOUR FUCKING BOX!<br />
cheeky c&#8217;unt.<br />
never step in when top boy is attending to his business, minekiller.<br />
you are a dimwit but you will be taught some manners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: udderly 'orrible</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-348722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[udderly 'orrible]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-348722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Portuguese call their Greens watermelons ...  for obvious reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Portuguese call their Greens watermelons &#8230;  for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is a Twat</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2009/11/19/why-did-labour-want-to-avoid-expenses-issue/#comment-348720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama is a Twat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://order-order.com/?p=13651#comment-348720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does the BBC when talking about MP expenses still use sill references to &#039;moats&#039; and &#039;duck houses&#039;?

What about that jock wanker Tam the wankers 18 thousands for two fucking book cases?

What about all the dodgy mortgages from Liebour MPs?

and why is the BBC trying to make out that Kelly has done a deal with Cameron to embarrass the one eyed jock mong?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the BBC when talking about MP expenses still use sill references to &#8216;moats&#8217;and &#8216;duck houses&#8217;?</p>
<p>What about that jock wanker Tam the wankers 18 thousands for two fucking book cases?</p>
<p>What about all the dodgy mortgages from Liebour MPs?</p>
<p>and why is the BBC trying to make out that Kelly has done a deal with Cameron to embarrass the one eyed jock mong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

