November 18th, 2009

Pork More Plentiful Under Labour

If you live in a constituency where the train stations are now going to be revamped you are nine times more likely to be living in a Labour seat.  9/10 of those getting a share of the £50 million earmarked by the government controlled Network Rail to be spent on redeveloping stations are represented by Labour MPs. The token opposition station is in Crewe (only recently Tory, and a seat Labour are desperate to get back at the general after their by-election defeat last year.)  So who are the the lucky piggies?

  • Manchester Victoria – Tony Lloyd LAB
  • Clapham Junction – Martin Linton LAB
  • Barking – Margaret Hodge LAB
  • Warrington Bank Quay – Helen Southworth LAB
  • Preston – Mark Hendrick LAB
  • Wigan North Western – Neil Turner LAB
  • Luton - Margaret Moran LAB
  • Liverpool Central – Louise Ellman LAB
  • Stockport – Ann Coffey LAB
  • Crewe – Edward Timpson CON

Perhaps the Labour Party only thinks Crewe is out on loan politically.  Such pork barrel politics is hardly subtle, but what a nice little treat to pop on all those election leaflets next year. Something tells Guido it won’t save Margaret Moran in Luton though…


494 Comments

  1. 1
    Tankboy says:

    Glug glug glug goes SS Nu Liebour

    • 23
      Tarmac the railways says:

      What’s the point of traoins these days? You only have to step outside and see that peeps want to travel by road or air.

      • 30
        Percy says:

        I didn’t like the meal on the Brixton to Victoria flight

        • 39
          NLJD says:

          Semen

          You really are scraping the barrel for “Spunky Spunky” stories at the moment.
          Howling at the moon would seem to be the best way of describing it.
          You really need to stop supporting Colombia’s export drive.

          Your homework on this is to find the stations missing from the list?
          The major transport interchanges in Tory seats that need work done and are missing from the list.

          Consequently best of luck.

          On a similar subject any comments on the 92-97 real transport investment anomolies –

          1) A1(M) south of Peterborough
          2) Networker fleet for WAGN?

          Were these the “Edwina Currie” projects from the DOT?
          Edwina Currie, I hear you gasp?
          Close to JM’s heart!

        • 42
          M25 says:

          Some Twat called Adonis said on the Telly that people do not want any more roads or motorways or bigger roads and motorways and these people want more train lines.

          • Sukyspook says:

            When I hear the name Lord ‘Adonis’ then see the reality of the ‘man’ sporting that name, my spirits are always raised!

          • NLJD says:

            Once more with feeling

            Semen

            You really are scraping the barrel for “Spunky Spunky” stories at the moment.
            Howling at the moon would seem to be the best way of describing it.
            You really need to stop supporting the Cali Cartel’s push for increased revenue.

            Your homework on this is to find the stations missing from the list?
            The major transport interchanges in Tory seats that need work done and are missing from the list.

            Consequently best of luck.

            On a similar subject any comments on the 92-97 real transport investment anomolies –

            1) A1(M) south of Peterborough
            2) Networker fleet for WAGN?

            Were these the “Edwina Currie” projects from the DOT?
            Edwina Currie, I hear you gasp?
            Close to JM’s heart!

          • Anonymous says:

            You’d best address this to Cammo when he’s PM mate.

          • Anonymous says:

            Anything that will encourage a Liebour canvasser to knock on my door is fine with me. I SO want one of them to make my day.

          • oldfella says:

            ….and scalextric

          • Anonymous says:

            Yet you still took the time to comment NLJD – for something so unimportant I’m surprised you’d waste the minute or so of your precious time that it took you to write what you did.

            Face it, your bunch of bullying, warmongering scumbag socialists are hated by anyone with half a brain, and failing Gordo finding a way of declaring martial law between now and next may, they’re on the way out.

            Deal with it!

          • Conservative puppets and traitors says:

      • 53
        Gordon Brown stole my pension says:

        The railways are an anachronism.

        By train, it would cost £90.80 return for my girlfriend and me to visit her parents. It’s a 40 minute walk to the station at our end, a 20 minute walk from the station to her parents at the other end. Total journey time: 4 hrs 3 minutes, involving 5 changes (presently, one section is a replacement bus service). Most of that time spent standing, while the car I need for work sits on the drive doing nothing.

        By car: Cost of petrol, £24 return. Including the 10 second walk to the car at both ends, journey time: 2 hrs 15 minutes, spent sitting in air-conditioned comfort, listening to Radio 3.

        As James May once said, a train gets you from where you aren’t, to where you don’t want to go. At extortionate cost.

        • 439
          Ruth Kelly's plaything says:

          (Er, never thought of driving to the station?)

          Ever since Beeching we’ve suffered from most of the main routes going to/from London. In most of the country, if you want to go east-west, you have the tortuous trip you describe.

          If I want to go to Cambridge, 30 miles away, by train I have to go into London and out again, a total of 150 miles. So I drive. Or catch the bus.

          HOWEVER, for journeys of between 100 and 400 miles, the train is absolutely the best way to travel. We pop over to Paris (fun) and Brussels (family) from time to time and both driving and flying are daft; the train is superb.

        • 454
          Samantha says:

          My feelings precisely. I can’t remember the last time I travelled by train – but I do remember it was only because my car had been pranged by some lout driving too fast down a narrow lane. I had to get someone to drive me to the station and collect me later – which cost me a bottle or two of decent wine on top of the exorbitant fare

          Train travel is uncomfortable and inconvenient, horribly expensive, and forces you to listen to other people’s kids, iPlayers, conversations, crisp -apers, and farts. Yuck.

          Mind you that was one privatisation which was an utter nonsense. The trains should be run, as they are in most European countries, as a public service, not to enrich shareholders.

          Then the whole horror show was compounded by Stephen Byers’ theft of Railtrack – worst of every possible world. You can’t have true competition where railways are concerned. Under current conditons, the pricing structures are so somplicated no-body can be bothered to try

          • Isambard Kingdom Brunel says:

            You are wrong Sir.

            The railways should pay their way. If they can not then there are serious questions to be asked.

            The flexible horseless carriage is a fantastic invention and coupled with a natiowide mesh of autoways that take people from where they do not want to be directly to where they do want to be at any time they wish is far superior to a rigid iron grid working to an inflexible timetable.

        • 490
          common sense says:

          I love the latest gov film telling me to drive 5 miles a week less each week, love to, then stopping closing huge sections of motorway for months on end just so two blokes can change a light bulb or whatever. The longer I’m on the road in nonsense traffic jams caused by this pointless act the more fuel I use!!! rail alone can’t solve our traffic problems but cutting down traffic jams and traffic calming with a bit of common sense will!!!!!

        • 492
          Sting's Beard says:

          Well said and furthermore have you noticed that since some of the posh papers went tabloid the railway operators have made the train carriages smaller to take advantage

      • 55
        Sukyspook says:

        Many peeps can’t afford to travel on trains any more and many don’t have jobs to travel to anyway….continuing the criminal enterprise that is ‘demockery’ of ZNL – and Tories…and Lib Dems.

        Listen to the criminal EU being exposed here and with our taxes the UK Gov is a co-conspirator in FRAUD:

      • 82
        Fred Goodwin's Duck Palace says:

        Warren Buffett just spent $44 billion in a purchase purchase of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway company

        Someone thinks there’s a future in rail

        • 132
          solopolis says:

          How much are all those steel rails worth as scrap?

        • 303
          Anonymous says:

          That’s a money making transcontinental freight railroad. Unlike people freight does not mind going by train and doesn’t need stations.

          The yanks take the plane while the freight takes the train.

          • D L George says:

            I’ve been on US trains, they’re quite nice, not too expensive and the last couple had smoking rooms.

          • Freedom says:

            Smoking rooms?

            Now that is civilised with a CAPITAL C.

            If you want to smoke and travel in the UK then your only option is to go by car, now that is UNcivilised.

        • 384
          Sukyspook says:

          Some would say that Buffet is buying up railroads for the planned NAFTA Super Highway – by the time it’s finished we’ll already be taxed for our every breath (UN carbon tax) and we will be told which jobs we’ll do and be told if we’re allowed to drive a car at all – if we continue to pretend all this isn’t happening of course…..(aside – Lou Dobbs ‘left’ CNN last week with an $8million severance….):

        • 447
          Mongrel says:

          BNSF has trains that are up to a mile long and transport heavy goods across vast distances in the US, at relatively low speeds where time is not of the essence. Many of its lines are freight only.
          Explain how an equivalent service could work in the UK.

      • 187
        next slide please, d-day says:

        No need for bribes in these areas. You could put a ferret with a red rosette up for election in some of these areas and there enough brain dead numpties that would vote for it. Living in the North West (nice part thankfully, they do exist) I have seen over and over again the same cretinous fuckwits vote Labour, as they are so thick they cannot comprehend that the areas in which they live have never improved at any stage under any Labour Government and never will as Labour have a vested interest in keeping people down.

        On a personal note, I’ll start using trains when they go where I need them to and I don’t have to sit next to some dirty sweaty chav with their feet on the seats, getting pissed and swearing at other people in the carriage, as was the case last time I had the misfortune to travel by public transport, 2 years ago.

        • 210
          Mr Ned says:

          When the train can take me, where I want to go and exactly when I want to go and can do so via the route I choose and at my pace and allow me to listen to whatever entertainment I choose and afford me the luxury of choosing which passengers I shall travel with. And be able to do that for the same cost as my current car travel, (ie London and back from the North West for 5 people for a total of £60.00), THEN I shall consider taking the train.

          I shall not pay more than double the cost to wait at their convenience to travel via a route that takes me out of my way that requires me to change from train to train to bus etc.. that takes far longer and where I am overcrowded and surrounded by the unhealthy and the sick and the chav and the crying babies and the drunks etc…

          • Mr Ed says:

            ‘where I am overcrowded and surrounded by the unhealthy and the sick and the chav and the crying babies and the drunks etc…’

            your journey is being confused with your arrival home
            you need to cut down on the alkyhol old boy

      • 291
        Skippy says:

        Only because we have the least integrated and most expensive rail system in the world.

    • 58
      NLJD says:

      Tankie

      Any chance of some original thought in your posts?
      Yopur comments and phraseology are straight out of Central Casting for “Spunky Spunky” right wing mentalist GIBy’s with no ability for independent thought.

      NR budget = £5bill
      10 Worst Stations = £50mill

      The work needs to be done.
      The amount is very low, 1% of the annual budget.
      What Tory stations have been missed out?

      Answers on a postcard to …

      • 88
        Brownian Motions says:

        “Answers on a postcard to …”

        Numpty Labourite Juvenile Dumbfuck.

        • 93
          Anonymous says:

          Jonty is shorter

        • 96
          NLJD says:

          Jobby Jabber

          Love the quality patter, you really are a wordsmith of the highest order.

          Now back to work you twat.
          Missing Tory Stations …

          • Wolfie Smith, Tooting Popular Front says:

            Go back to your masters and lick their bottoms.

            Power to the people!!!

          • Time for my speech.

            Thank God this is the last time I have to read a propaganda sheet from this most venal and corrupt party.
            I’m sorry, ordinary poor people, but if i don’t do it they will abolish me and I’ll have to live in a socialist paradise. Like Newham.
            So I shall read it out , but if you look carefully you can see I’m rolling my eyes and shaking my head.

            I wouldn’t object so much except its written on the back of a letter to a dead soldier. And it starts Dear Elizsabletf reed this owt.. And its written in crayon. And it smells.

            Still, keep thinking to yourselves, in six months they’ll all be gone.

      • 95
        Moley says:

        Any chance you can conduct your vendetta with Guido by e mail?

        Reading your posts is like bystanding a lover’s tiff.

        Incomprehensible arguments about things that don’t matter.

      • 134
        Putin says:

        Network Rail have announced plans to plans to spend £3.25bn to improve more than 2,000 stations across England and Wales by 2014.

        That 10 cases appear top of the list a week later of which 9/10 are in Labour constituencies,is of course complete coincidence.

        This means others,including the Tory ones you wish others to highlight will have been pushed down the list.

        Of course, no-one would be daft enough to take up your challenge to list them as the research will take forever and would not fit on a postcard.

        Guido is entitled to an opinion which is I presume, intended to provoke discussion. Your assumption that he is deliberately bending the truth probably reveals more about you than him. He is not claiming his opinion as fact.

        I also think harping back to 1992 is a little desperate. If that’s worthwhile how about:

        Cash for peerages
        Ecclestone’s donation
        Iraq War
        David Kelly
        Super Csinos
        Lisbon referendum
        The economy
        The gold sale

        I am sure others could add a few more.

        • 169

          Future lynx
          integrated transport policy
          The dome
          M4 bus lane
          Heathrow third runway
          total lack of energy policy
          MRSA
          HIPS
          pointless VAT cut
          Legal aid cuts
          Prison non building scandal
          42 days detention
          unfunded super carriers
          Eurofighter contract
          Apache contract

          and many more

          • Reg511 says:

            PFI, the labour time bomb

          • David Blunkett's Cheese Grater says:

            Merlin Contract
            Chinook Contract
            SA80 Rifle reliability & renovation contract
            Type 45 Destroyer Contract

          • Monkey Chops says:

            Printing money a la Zimbabwe
            Rigging elections with postal voting
            Educashun Educashion Educateon
            Tough on Crime
            24 hours to save the NHS
            etc…

          • Anonymous says:

            HIPS Bill, I had one replaced under Labour and haven’t walked properly since

          • IRB says:

            Foot and mouth
            GP contracts
            That minor hiccup over dentistry services
            Any IT project you want to recall

          • Putin says:

            This is a gift which just keeps on giving……

          • Tier 2 visa abuses – allowing companies to displace the UK workforce with cheaper labour

            IR 35 travesty

            S660 travesty

            Retrospective taxation

            Fiddling with the tax system so it now becomes unfathomable

            Adding so much pointless red tape to everything that actually making a profit becomes impossible when competing in a global marketplace

            Raising SME Corp Tax while lowering large companies CT

            Using council tax to carry out socialist welfare by the backdoor

            Encouraging self-employed to incorporate then hit them with new taxes

            Increasing the tax take on low earners

            Stealth taxes by the arsefull

            Gordon’s Tax credit system: “where we take your tax, waste it on bureaucracy and give you some of it back”

            Continuing the Tory position of moving welfare claimants onto Disability allowance to make their employment record look better

            Minimum wage: hits profits, low paid work is moved offshore and the indiginous low skilled worker ends up trapped on benefits

            Yup, that’s quite an achievement for a bunch of socialist arsewipes.

          • Charlie Whelan ate my hampster says:

            Illegal destruction of animals during the F&M fiasco (& whole conduct of same)
            Years wasted on a useless Hunting Bill based on class hatred not facts
            Theft of pensions
            Treatment of pensioners, some starving and most freezing in winter
            Sending the army to war unprotected and starved of equipment
            Sale of gold reserves

            And many more

        • 172
          Animal says:

          Just a minor point perhaps, but it did strike me that the 10 worst stations were all in Labour held constituencies. It just had that stink of the left-wing obsessive hatred of anything and anyone wishing to be proud of their work, their community and their facilities, hauling it all down into the gutter to make sure nothing stands out, all is grey and identity, pride and ambition is destroyed.

          Although the comment that many other stations will be improved is perfectly valid, NJLD somewhat misses the point; that such publicity should be pumped out by a Labour Tranposrt Secretary which focuses on redevelopment work on stations in Labour constituencies. It’s not hard to see the political game being played here is it?

          It’s not a new tactic of course, but that doesn’t make it acceptable.

          • NLJD says:

            … Veggie …

            The list was drawn up by those two well known Labour lackeys –

            Chris Green + Peter Hall.

            Consequently I fear the bias accusation will be a bit harder to substantiate.

            Main point for me is the spin put on this announcement by Semen and the echo chamber analysis put forward by the mentalist right wing GIBy’s who crawl out of the woodwork to post on “Spunky Spunky”.

            My main point on the “Edwina” projects is that JM was a quite a good political operative even if he couldn’t lead a rendition of “Happy Birthday”.

            Maggie on the otherhand is / was / will always be a witch / draft dodger / reptile of the highest order.

      • 336
        Heliogabalus says:

        Are you pissed NLJD or is it that you just can’t spell

        • 339
          Heliogabalus says:

          Are you pissed NLJD or is it that you just can’t spell or maybe it’s because your scottish

      • 427
        Nitz says:

        Try Knutsford for a start, Liebour troll boy.

        • 482
          NLJD says:

          Zit

          I see we have the high productivity wing of the “Spunky Spunky” right wing mentalist gang.

          1 station takes 5hrs 25 minutes.
          Away and throw shite at yerself ya windae licker arsewipe.

    • 113
      Bstards says:

      Our disgraced MPs have disgraced themselves again. Only a handful of the “honourable” members had the grace to turn up for the Queen’s speech.

      I hope their wages are docked for skiving off.

      • 194
        oldfella says:

        couldn’t someone lock them all in together – for ever – and let the rest of the population get on with their busy live?

      • 231
        Anonymous says:

        Like they care?

      • 392
        Sukyspook says:

        I realise Her Madge had a cold (‘da swines’ innit aka ’swine eleven’) however I thought she sounded pretty peed off reading all that EU/world twaddle.

        • 443
          "For the restless, not the true believers, this one's for you.." says:

          She looked like she was going to throw up, perhaps it was something that she had to swallow? Or perhaps she was suffering from those ‘Dark Forces’ that stalk the nation?

    • 346
      Moderate Comment says:

      No votes to be gained by tarting up railway stations in marginal “consteruancys” Majority of travellers can’t afford to use the train these days.

  2. 2
    James says:

    Nice try!

    But as a Tory living in Clapham Junction – I have 2 points – firstly the station (the self-styled busiest in the UK) is a dump and needs an overhaul. Secondly, the Conservatives are likely to hold this seat 5 months from now.

    • 54
      Dick the Prick says:

      Guido’s on Radio 5

    • 146
      Countryboy says:

      Given the level of overhaul many stations need, £5 million per station won’t scratch the surface. Token gesture politics.

      • 171
        Cinna says:

        % million quid gets you nothing these. It’ll cost that just to do the risk assessments of scraping the rust off and re-painting the roof of Victoria station.

      • 248
        Gurner says:

        They’ve been painting my local station ’tis slabour’ the last few weeks. I initially thought the colour grey they’ve been using was undercoat, it’s apparently the finished deal. £5m our station lmao. I’d put the price at no more than £10K for the lot inc paint and wire brushs to put it on with. Thats what I think they’ve been using looking at the finish.

        • 327
          Government and Quangocracy contractor says:

          You do realise that these government contracts are very mutually lucrative dont you? Ever wondered why the same companies always get the contracts, the work is always uniformly shoddy and overpriced, yet none query the real cost as opposed to the contract cost?

          Yes Britain really is that corrupt these days.

          • "For the restless, not the true believers, this one's for you.." says:

            Friend of mine had a new shower filled by one of these charity quangos.

            Nearly £5000!!!

            One cheap bath, one wall, plaster-boarded and skimmed.

            No new toilet, and a second hand sink!

            Money for nothing!!!!

          • "For the restless, not the true believers, this one's for you.." says:

            Fitted sorry not filled…must clear up this work station…..

    • 185

      Is James the green one or the red one?

      • 237
        PD77 says:

        Red, definitely red.
        Thomas, Gordon and Edward were blue.
        Percy and Henry were green.
        Toby the steam tram was brown due to him having a timber frame carriage.
        God I’m so dull :C

    • 272
      Anonymous says:

      Don’t count your chickens James – Martin Linton may have a tiny majority of 163 votes, but firstly you don’t know how many newcomers to the area, grateful to the glorious leader and his lackies for giving them a passport, may vote for Labour in the election, and secondly you don’t know how many “postal votes” might keep Linton in parliament.

    • 315
      Railway Pedant says:

      James:

      “But as a Tory living in Clapham Junction”

      You mean you live in the station? I can understand why you would like it fixed up! There is no such place as Clapham Junction (other than the point on the tracks just east of platforms 5 and 6). The station of that name is in Battersea – it’s just that the London & South Western Railway Company thought “Clapham Junction” was a more upmarket name than “Battersea Junction” would be.

      Anyway, leaving aside the constituency in which it is located, the “announcement” was yet another lie by our Glorious Leader and his Happy Band of Helpers, since the Clapham Junction upgrade was announced ages ago and work has been going on for a long time already.

      This is simply another classsic case of reannouncing the same thing over and over to make the plebs think something new is happening.

      • 337

        RP – the area is better known as Frappé Sur Mer.

      • 368
        James says:

        Many residents call this area of Battersea “Clapham Junction” after the fucking great big station that exists smack-bang in the middle of it. Nobody this side of the fucking 1940s calls it Battersea Station.

        Rest of your comment goes without saying with this Government.

        Now fuck off and count trains.

        • 408
          Railway Pedant says:

          James:

          “Now fuck off and count trains.”

          Just doing that now actually James! Thought I would head on down to Battersea to do some trainspotting at Clapham Junction ;-)

  3. 3

    Good spot – nearly missed that one!

    • 271
      Road_Hog says:

      That guy that got arrested for handing in the shotgun. Anyone who followed that story over the weekend might like to read this.

      http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/news/cops-suspended-alleged-dishonest-conduct/article-1016771-detail/article.html

      Hat tip to bigbrotherwatch for finding it.

      • 275
        Anonymous says:

        Nice to know, but it won’t help the poor bloke who has seen the country he served chew him up and spit him out into the prison system.

      • 418
        Pontius The Pilot says:

        That is fucking scandalous. Fucking pigs bought off by the politicos again for a fucking change. WTF is this country coming to?

        • 461
          Charlie Whelan ate my hampster says:

          Absolutely scandalous, and shows how utterly incompetent the lawyers drafting our laws now appear to be. There is barely a law passed in the last 15 / 20 years which doesn’t have detrimental consequences to the innocent, all of which should have been forseen. That’s what the damn lawyers are paid for!

          As someone involved int his case said, “what would you do if you found a shotgun in a public park – woudl you leave it there?”

          However, in order not to further jeopardise the soldier’s position, I’d better say no more
          “Comments on this story have been disabled for legal reasons” as the link says…

          • Charlie Whelan ate my hampster says:

            PS The incident would also appear to demonstrate how far the police have taken leave of any common sense. Or maybe, just been deprived of any discretion.

  4. 4
    Polite conversation says:

    So what will Cameron be saying to Brown as they walk along the corridor in to the Chamber for this year’s irrelevant Queens Speech?

    DC; ” I see you even had to beg your wife to get her knockers out for that photo opportunity”

  5. 5
    All aboard says:

    Perhaps the list all of it. shows what happens if you have a Labour MP. He is more interested in riding the gravy train than looking after the stations.

    • 166
      Mono Polly says:

      You have landed on my station where I have bought 3 hotels. Please pay £1500 and take a card from the Community Chest. Do not collect £200 as you pass Go.

  6. 7
    Sir William Waad says:

    To prove the point Guido should give examples of run-down stations in Conservative or Liberal constituencies. Otherwise it could just be that run-down stations tend to be in Labour constituencies, perhaps because Labour voters are more likely to vandalise their local station or vomit over it.

    • 13
      Handy man says:

      or cut off the odd hand or two.

    • 46
      Railway Man says:

      Selling Railway Station :” Formerly an excellent example of country station architecture, it was mysteriously destroyed by fire in the early 1990s, shortly before it was to be awarded listed building status”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selling_railway_station

      Nothing there now.

    • 108
      Sir Trev Skint MP says:

      Every feckin Labour held constituency is sh!te.

      Labour voters are a vile lot. Lazy, thieving scum. They rape their own kids and force their dogs to take drugs.

      I am unanimous in that.

      • 400
        Sir Stuart Bell-End MP says:

        Sir Trev, what you say about Labour voters may or may not be true. However, it is certainly true that my constituency is shite. This is because I spend the majority of my time elsewhere avoiding those who elect me to represent their interests and who pay my for my substantial salary and perks!

        And that is just how it should be! I am a passenger travelling on a wonderful gravy train whch masquerades as Democracy! Isn’t it wonderful?

        Ker-ching!!!!

    • 147
      Anonymous says:

      Correct, Sir William.

      Cause and effect.

    • 218
      oldfella says:

      that’s a helluva lot of vomit, Sir William!

    • 411
      Minekiller says:

      It doesn’t say much about Labour’s attitude to it’s loyal voters if they are only getting round to fixing their Railway Stations after 13 years in power. And – why it seems logiacl to ask – are the Railway Stations in Tory constituencies in better condition?

  7. 8
    Disco Stew says:

    Labour=Incompetence

  8. 11
    Osama the Nazarene says:

    Glad you pointed it out. Not many people would have known that. Another service performed for the electors.

    Typical NuLiebor making you think that these stations were chosen because they were really really in need of repair! When all it is, is good old Liebor pork barrel politics.

  9. 12
    alister says:

    50 Million seems a lot BUT I’m guessing that to properly fix the roof at Manchester will be about £5m, to add more tunnels at Crewe (you can’t close the existing to widen) will cost £5m+ as you the rest well you get the idea. You really need to spend the bulk of the £50m on one station but this way they get to boast that they’re helping 10 whilst helping none.
    This is a sticking plaster to cover a gaping wound – 60 years of chronic underinvestment, as it was easier to deny the public utilities cash than raise taxes, it’s common across all the utilities, Thatcher privatised what she could so that the private utilities could borrow what they needed. (new water plants new sewerage plants,)
    This is the same problem with the Post Office year after year it was raided for cash and not allowed to modernise, now what mess is it in?

  10. 14
    Rebel Saint says:

    Isn’t that because Labour constituencies are hovels of poverty and underinvestment, and the people in them have been conditioned to believe that if they keep voting the same way every 5 years then one day they’ll get different results.

  11. 15
    Steve Expat says:

    Guido, surely Margaret Moran is standing down in Luton – or has she had a Kirkbride-esque change of heart recently?

    • 18
      Rotten to the core says:

      I heard she had accidentally sat in a bath full of dry rot powder.

    • 20
      Mitch says:

      actually it looks like she’s stood-down already:

      http://www.margaretmoran.org.uk/index.php/2009/11/statement-2/

      why the gratuitous reference to being elected 3 times?

    • 436
      Linky says:

      Luton being listed is complete spin anyway. The rebuilding of the Train and Bus station has been on the go forever! They started by knocking down the bus station for over 12 months ago! (The old/new bus station is now just a car park, as they discovered that the second largest car park in town was about to fall down.)

      That luton is on the list is a joke. While not a good station, there are MANY more much worse in the south east. The only time things where really bad was then the goverment shut down Rail Track while they were half way through replacing the roof. We had a winter standing the rain.

  12. 16
    scotched earth policy says:

    Guido,
    of comment I know, watching the BBC news last night regarding inflation they said that ii would have a greater effect when the 2 1/2 % went back on fuel.
    Is it me , but i thought that the VAT was never taken of fuel in the first place.
    There up to something, after all its only a week since Robinson metioned an exit stratergy, and look at where we are now a possible conference January.

    • 38
      Hugh Janus says:

      VAT levied on already excessive fuel duty – only in this country?

    • 44
      Steve Expat says:

      VAT is not only paid on the fuel, but also on the fuel tax. Between them they are about 80% of the pump price.

      • 131
        thick as thieves says:

        and are the tories proposing to reduce those tax overcharges on fuel, steve?

        • 184
          Animal says:

          Given the parlous state of the nation’s coffers how would you propose a Conservative Administration plugs the resulting hole from abolishing VAT on fuel then TaT?

          • TaT could auction his organs and other body parts on eBay for a start. The unused brain and very muscular right forearm (excluding hand, which by now will be in an advanced stage of carpal tunnel syndrome) will surely be enough to pay for Mandy’s new Patek Philippe.

          • tats dancing slag says:

            I can recommend a good wank to wind up an automatic.

          • thick as thieves says:

            Tuscan Tony could auction her organs and other body parts on eBay for a start. The unused brain and very muscular right forearm (excluding hand, which by now will be in an advanced stage of carpal tunnel syndrome) will surely be enough to pay for Mandy’s new Patek Philippe.

            animal: the coward, steve expat, has run away from answering my question. he has probably run off to his crackdealer’s house. so it is very good of you to step in on your boyfriend’s behalf.
            so that is a no on vat reduction. now, pray tell, what is the conservative’s policy regarding the reduction of the cripplying 80% fuel tax on fuel.
            will the conservatives reduce that extortionate level of fuel tax set by gordon brown?

          • Alibarbs says:

            Of course they won’t Tat, for reasons Animal has already mentioned – how is it cowardly to state the bleeding obvious? You’ve not answered the question put to you

            Excessive tax on Fuel has been around for so long now that no government would reduce it by anything of note – Brown may have increased it, but it wasn’t exactly low before he and his bunch of cretins got into power in 1997. Add to that the fact that we now have green nazis screaming “Denier” at anyone who questions anything they say, and it would have to be a government with bloody big cajones to attempt to cut fuel tax.

            I’m not saying I agree with it being as high as it is – I started driving about 18 years ago when petrol was around 42p a litre, and I’d love it to be back there again, but it’s a fact of life that it won’t be coming down.

            Cameron may be a twat, but he’s not a completely mental twat, so don’t expect him to reduce fuel duty in a hurry, as he’d only have to increase a tax somewhere else which would no doubt have the master baiters of this world and their political masters screaming down the house about how it’s not just labour that put up taxes.

            Trying thinking about reality rather than your idealistic world view for once.

        • 285
          Steve Expat says:

          It’s unlikely that the Tories will be cutting many taxes tat, especially one that’s been around as long as fuel duty – from memory it raises about 40Bn quid a year!

          I’m hoping they cut the silly 50% top income tax rate though, it’s just socialist spite which will lead to an increase in accountants’ fees and an increase in emigration, but a reduction in tax take.

          Expect massive spending cuts though, if I were one of those “Ethnic Diversity Monitoring Directors” earning 80-100k, I’d be shitting myself at the prospect of the Tories winning!

          • thick as thieves says:

            ah, no change from gordon brown’s position.
            thankyou steve.

          • Animal says:

            Thanks for not answering the question I asked TaT but then, hypocrisy is a nasty little trait of yours.

            It’s patently obvious that the next Government will be facing an unholy fiscal mess that will prove difficult, painful and unpleasant to unravel. Are you able to see past your childish point-scoring and understand that or do you think that your sneering remarks reflecting your own suppressed sexuality and keyboard warrior posturing somehow elevates you above such matters?

          • thick as thieves says:

            oh dear, you are a very dim troll indeed.
            TOP BOY ASKS THE QUESTIONS AND YOU FUCKING ANSWER THEM!
            YOU CHEEKY FUCKING WHORE!
            YOU DO NOT BACKCHAT TOP BOY YOU FUCKING SCUM TORY SLAG!
            I am not running for government, animal.
            and I am not at your beck and call: I am top boy, you belong to me.
            therefore I do not need to answer your spastic questions.
            you answer to me animal.
            don’t you forget it you fucking slag.

          • Mr Ned says:

            Yeah, but the climate change co-ordinators and carbon offset directors (with their company jaguars) will be safe, won’t they!

          • Herr Flick says:

            Ve are asking ze qvestions, tat.

        • 485
          scotched earth policy says:

          back to the Question will we be paying 20% VAT on Unleaded in the new year

  13. 19
    Gerry Mander says:

    Move along now, nothing to see…it’s all above board.

  14. 22
    George Street says:

    Ah! Trains! There’s absolutely NOTHING wrong with Preston, charming station. Warrington is a shit-hole but it’s a bit rich to criticise for the perspective of ‘factories and car parks’ – it’s in Warrington, for effs sake. How on earth did Manchester Oxford Road miss the cut?

  15. 24
    Road_Hog says:

    I see Redditch train station isn’t on the list.

    • 56
      Steve Expat says:

      Even Liebour don’t think they’re going to retain that seat any more…

    • 62
      Ex-Radish says:

      Redditch station consists of a hut and a platform at the end of a spur line. The local railway franchise holder cancels trains to the town as the whim takes them. Which is often. Not worth spending 50p on, never mind 50 million.

    • 191
      Animal says:

      The best use of public money for Redditch is a very, very large bomb. Delivered in person by their MP.

  16. 25
    George Street says:

    AH! TRAINS! There’s nowt wrong with Preston, charming little station. Warrington Bank is a shit-hole ’surrounded by factories and car parks’ but it’s in WARRINGTON, for effs sake. How on earth did Manchester Oxford Road miss the cut? Arnside – beautiful view. Go there.

  17. 27
    bergen says:

    It is always the same irrespective of party.All governments throw money at their marginals.The safe seats-Rhondda and rural Surrey have more in common than they realise.No need for electoral bribes there.Forgotten areas.

  18. 28
    Bottle-fed Triplet says:

    Train Station! Come on Guido you are getting as bad as those semi-literate Beeboids.

    It is a Railway Station.

    You don’t have an aeroplane port or a ship port, do you?

  19. 31
    They're all at it says:

    It’s hardly a surprise.

    That said, what would be interesting would be the amount of cash spent (on trains, regeneration…etc) on the marginal seats – and yes, I know most of Liebours seats could now be classified as marginal – in an effort to show how fantastic they are…

    Also, how many of the recipients of this cash (advisors, industry…etc) are Liebour supporters. One last scoup of the gravy train before they get off??

  20. 32
    genghiz the kahn says:

    The ‘investment’ strategy for upgrading Network Rail also promised another electrified route from Liverpool to Manchester, yet funds are strangely missing for the redoubling of track between Salisbury and Exeter, Stroud and Swindon, and Notwork Fail claim it would take 7 years to reinstate the line from Portishead to Bristol for passenger use.

    It would be pertinent to ask why Heathrow has not got links to the National Rail Network to take traffic off the roads?

    Too many of the recent upgrades are to lines which pass through Labour held marginals, and too little has gone on improvements to lines in areas of economic growth.

    Brown and Blair highlighted the success of improved spending on the railways, but I wonder how much of it went on the gravy train ride across Kent to Brussels.

    • 196
      Cinna says:

      Personally I’ve always found the Heathrow Express useful for accessing the national rail network, if you don’t mind doing it via Paddington. Useful if a trifle expensive.

      • 233
        spotter says:

        in a time of great economic turmoil I fink the best solution would be to just have one station – going from my front door all the way round the back, into the garden and back in through the kitchen – close the rest.

    • 290

      Heathrow has a rail station and an 2 underground stations (terminal 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 and terminal 5).

    • 487
      Sian says:

      Ah but then, the southwest isn’t exactly Labour territory is it? Perhaps this would explain why it takes nearly three hours to take a 40 mile train journey from Yeovil to Bristol.

  21. 33
    Alan Jones says:

    That is because the most impoverished places in the country are those where the voters elect Labour politicians.
    To defeat Labour comprehensively money must be directed towards these areas to improve infrastructure and quality of life.

    • 37
      Bottle-fed Triplet says:

      An interesting idea. After the Conservatives win the next election they should hose the Labour safe seats with money and point out that after voting for Labour since the ice age, only the Conservatives can deliver.

      Great publicity.

      • 45
        Cockney Christian says:

        I kid you not, there are no labour safe seats in constituencies that still have a majority of real English people in them.

      • 48
        Steve Expat says:

        This ‘money’ that you speak of, from where does it come?

        • 51
          Bottle-fed Triplet says:

          At present it seems to come from the Bank of England photocopier!

          • Steve Expat says:

            Ah yes, the inflation printer whirring away.

            Liebour’s motto – when you run out of money, just make some more of it!

          • You’ll find that money comes from wealth, wealth comes from meeting demand & improving productivity and those come SOLELY from comparative advantage.

          • It’s why taxing exchange is so disastrous for the economy.

            Working, Employing and Investing all have positive externalities and the tax on them should be zero.

            There’s only one good tax, and that’s on unimproved land values (and other state created monopolies).

  22. 34
    Bottle-fed Triplet says:

    You’ll soon have to watch out for the patronising letter from the prospective parliamentary candidate. I had one reecently asking if I had pride in my community and can the PPC help with getting better buses or new swings in the park for the kiddies.

    Why are these people footling around as if they are parish councillors? Still it may help them avoid the difficult questions like our debt crisis, Afghanistan or immigration.

    • 71
      I predict a riot says:

      I would like to help my local MP cut his head off with the chainsaw he bought on expenses and then stick the two vases he charged us (£25) right up his arse.

    • 75
      Pride's Purge says:

      Probably because all the really important decisions are taken at EUSSR level. This means that Parliament and our MPs get bored and decide to do the local councils’ jobs for them – badly! And if it’s something unpopular (like concreting all over the countryside), then they get a quango like the regional assemblies to do it. Yes, I’m a councillor, yes, I’m pissed off about it….

    • 238
      The Number One PPC says:

      We don’t do difficult questions. I don’t get paid enough to do that. Now, if you want to give me a pay rise…………well, who knows…………???

  23. 35
    Angry of SE1 says:

    Lets not forget that, when he was transport minister, Alistair Darling only built new stations and track in his OWN constituency….

  24. 36
    genghiz the kahn says:

    I do wonder when Barking was added on to the list for improvement, was it before or after Nick Griffin decided to stand against Enver Hodge?

    Perhaps a mole at Notwork Rail would like to spill the beans?

    • 49
      Bottle-fed Triplet says:

      I think Nick has got Labour worried, especially in Barking. Perhaps, in future, the present MP should be refered to as “The foreign-born millionaire’s daughter, Lady Hodge”.

      I’m sure that will go down well with the salt of the earth working class in Barking!!

      • 67
        Cockney Christian says:

        Her name is Oppenheimer

        • 78
          Ig says:

          Margaret Hodge was born in Cairo to Jewish parents. She changed her name many years later when they moved to Britain.

        • 79
          Bottle-fed Triplet says:

          Was Oppenheimer, then it was Watson now it is Hodge. Anyway, whereabouts in Barking does she live, or doesn’t she share with her constituents the joys of living in her constituency?

  25. 43
    Cockney Christian says:

    Pork barrel politics – reminiscent of the kind operated by the zionist lobby defended by Guido yesterday?

    • 52
      Anonymous says:

      And this has nothing to do with Labour holding more urban seats than the Tories with a higher proportion of transport hubs?

  26. 57
    Ed Balls says:

    That’s because most labour seats are utter shit holes.

  27. 59
    The IMF is coming says:

    For list of vulnerable seats see

    http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/

  28. 60
    Help help, here come the bears says:

    I am sure that given time Labours “investment” will create a new generation of facist right wingers

    It will be the same in Europe, where the far right will hijack the framework the Left have assembled

    It is a good job the EU did not exist in the 1930’s as Hitler would have easilt taken power

    The naive left, base most decisions on false assumptions i.e you can end boom & bust or once in power, the Left will stay in power.

  29. 63
    Anonymous says:

    The rich have left the inner cilies where these stations are located.

  30. 64
    I predict a riot says:

    This total bollocks about a law to ensure future govt’s have to do “x’ with the economy/debt that the c*unt Brown has saddled us with,is the most Alice In Wonderland pile of crap ever!

    Is this country REALLY going to stand and watch The Queen read this list of f ing crap out?

    We must be outside Parliament as she speaks,making enough noise to ensure the scum in there can hear us and will not let this crap happen.

    I predict a massive riot within the next month

    • 92
      Anonymous says:

      “I predict a massive riot within the next month”

      Duly noted. That’s the 76th prediction we’ve had this year.

    • 250
      RavingMad says:

      It is truly incredible that this moronic lot of fraudsters and clowns can gather like this, in public, with all the show and pomposity of something meaningful yet riddled with deceit, ineptitude and vainglory. It is a measure of how low we have fallen as a nation that they think and do – get away with it. Honestly, what is the point of this anymore?? They have no credibility with the majority of the population and they continue as if nothing was wrong……

  31. 68
    NLJD says:

    Colombia’s export drive

  32. 69
    NLJD says:

    The Cali Cartel’s push for increased revenues

  33. 70
    napoleon, animal farm says:

    “Pork More Plentiful Under Labour”

    Of course it is.

  34. 74
    Musings says:

    Who can remember the ad in the 1980s of a desolate railway station with the VoPo in their cars watching everybody on the streets? – thinking about it, it seems to be describing now in EUland…

    I suppose Gordo fancies himself arriving at the Finland station to “save the nation” (from himself).

  35. 77
    Anonymous says:

    The State Crown has arrived at Westminster, I hope Gordon doesn’t spot it, a few bob there.

  36. 80
    Postal Vote says:

    guess the city folk coming into waterloo won’t see their station improved before spring 2010

    i remember that waterloo and city line – time warp set up – fantastic

    why didn’t all that get shown to the IOC members visiting london prior to its election for 2010?

  37. 81
    David says:

    Haha, who will be the lucky piggies???

    Waiting to see.

    • 86
      genghiz the kahn says:

      genghiz the kahn says:
      November 17, 2009 at 9:39 am
      Today’s lucky Rail Lottery winners are Tony Lloyd, Kate Hoey, Martin Linton, Margaret Hodge, Ann_Coffey, Helen Jones, Helen Southworth, Mark Hendrick, Neil Turner, Louise Ellman, Kelvin Hopkins, Margaret Moran.

      Funny how so much money is being used to upgrade stations in Labour held constituencies.

  38. 84
    Moley says:

    Write Brown’s “school report.”

    http://www.power2010.org.uk/page/s/GradeGordonBrown

    Seen on Coffee House.

  39. 85
    Stronghold Barricades says:

    I think if you dig deeper, you might find that this is re-announced money

    Lord Adonis also said that the money was dependant upon money from local councils

    I know that the revamp for Crewe is a project in motion because they have already taken back buildings from Royal Mail, and plans are close to being presented to the local council because the revamp needs to include the replacement of a road bridge which is a main arterial road in Crewe

  40. 87
    Oliver says:

    Guido, any thoughts most major train stations are in urban areas and these tend to be Labour seats. After all they do control more than half of all seats and most urban seats country wide. Also what have the Tories given us on transport? Privatised railways and chronic underfunding for a generation…

    • 91
      genghiz the kahn says:

      Ask why so little has been allocated to Southern England, The West, The South West, Eastern England, East Anglia, The West Midlands, The East Midlands.

      Is it not a cause for wondering why so much has been shifted to window dressing projects in the above seats.

      • 112
        Oliver says:

        The short sightedness of some people. The majority of total investment goes to the south. CHannel Tunnel, Jubille line extension, now cross rail, east london line extension and the Tube. The south has dominated infrastructre development for a generation. THe stations referred to are chronically underfunded and desperate for a revamp. Allow the north to catch up and stop being so myopic!

        • 144
          Anonymous says:

          Here, here

        • 157
          Moley says:

          You can happily have the tens of thousands of homes the Government says have to be built in the East and South East on good farmland.

          We have a chronic water shortage which is not being addressed in the planning decisions. The new homes will bring in permanenet water rationing and sky high water bills.

          • revolting peasant says:

            Not just good farmland, but Green Belt land -mainly in the safe Tory shires-will also be built on thanks to the recent relaxation of planning reglations

          • Oliver says:

            Bit unfair, the reason the GOvernment wants to extend housing, was the over heating southern english economy. Why has it done so well and the rest of the country not? Political decisions. Allowing the City to run wild and favouring a service led economy whereas european states have favoured high skill manufacturing.
            They are only responding to shortages. Make a more balanced economy and there will be less demand. As for greenbelt. Most of it is nonsense scrubland and worthless. Maybe if we had had better transport links the economy could be more balanced and demand for housing in the south lower. But then that would involve state investment and central planning, some thing you guys are seemingly hostile to…

          • Oliver,

            The USSR is in the past where it belongs.

            Look up the LVT instead, it helps even out these sorts of problems.

          • Anonymous says:

            Oliver- don’t tar us all with the same brush.

          • revolting peasant says:

            Green belt land has been protected for generations for a reason and it’s not all worthless and useless scrubland.

          • Save Our Allotments!!!! says:

            Moley, we won’t just get a chronic water shortage. Eventually we will have a food shortage.

            The last thing I am is a commie, but we should look to Havana and operate a ‘food first’ policy, which saved Castro’s regime after the collapse of the USSR and the loss of Soviet aid.

            A greater self-sufficiency in food production, and therefore more food security, would help create employment and contribute to a more stable society.

            But such a commonsense approach is highly unlikely to be adopted. If our nation produces more food, the less land it will have to build crappy starter homes to house the humungous amount of immigrants we have experienced in the last few years.

            Of course, I’m no conspiracy theorist, but it is hardly surprising people look for other explanations for such short-sighted policies that will only increase our national dependency culture.

            Rent an allotment and use it before your local council builds the slums of the future upon them.

          • revolting peasant says:

            I’m lucky enough to have rented an allotment for the past ten years. Keeps my family in fresh fruit and veg all year. Sady there’s now a waiting list of 50 for plots and no sign that my local council will release any unused land.

  41. 89
    streamfisher says:

    Just had a knock at the door, two people asking me what I thought about Government’s, was surprised, canvassing for a Political Party?, no Jehovah Witnesses, obviously seen a gap in the market.
    PS. Noticed that M.Ps and Party activists no longer dare to face the general public.

    • 347
      Australian says:

      It is an interesting state of affairs when it is a welcome relief to discover that it is the Jehovah’s Witnesses knocking on your door and not a politician!

  42. 90
    Bottle-fed Triplet says:

    I heard Polly Twaddle on the wireless at the weekend saying that the Conservatives don’t understand the economy and that UK plc cannot be run like a household. (Sub text-All you little people do not possess a towering intellect like me, the Great Polly!!). She even had the brass neck to say that Economics was a failed science that didn’t work.

    She obviously hadn’t grasped the basic and very simple concept of living within your means. Britain is living on tick, Polly, and the buggers want ME, and loads of other poor sods like me to pay the tally man.

    • 123
      Sir William Waad says:

      Of course you can run an economy like a household. You can borrow lots of money without thinking how you will repay it, splurge it all on God knows what, boast to everybody about your extreme cleverness, lend huge quantities to ne’er-do-well relatives (banks) and then blame somebody else when it all goes belly-up.

      Economics is not a science, since its theories cannot usually be tested rigorously by experiment. That doesn’t mean it’s useless or that it has ‘failed’. Indeed, it means that it cannot actually fail, because it does not make definite predictions.

      • 320

        I made predictions, they came true.

        Economics is easy. It’s just that those in the establishment only listen to neo-Keynesian*/Marxist nonsense. Prbably because they are mainly rent-seekers and it benefits them (at ours and the countries great expense)

        *Not even Keynes would agree with.

    • 316

      The laws of thermodynamics apply especially to economics.

      Can’t get something for nothing.
      Expanding money without work being done cools the economy (Adiabatic).
      Being more than a vessel to hold the reaction (Property rights) slows the reaction.

      • 352
        Carry On Don't Lose Your Head (1967) says:

        Economics being a pseudoscience, that few economists know anything of physics, this economy all starts to make sense!

  43. 94
    Railmaster says:

    To be honest, and I dislike zanulab as much anyone, but rail stations north of Brum do need a desperate revamp. Anyone who has had to change at Crewe or
    Warrington Bank Quay will now the score. They are shit-holes.

    • 121
      Sir Trev Skint MP says:

      I’m no fan of Labour Railway Stations, but…

    • 130
      Sir William Waad says:

      Glasgow Central is nice, really quite classy with good facilities. Glasgow Queen Street, by contrast, is not so good and seems to attract the drunks.

      Edinburgh Waverley is surprisingly grotty for a supposed landmark.

    • 183
      George Stephenson says:

      Has anyone seen my rocket?

    • 222
      Archer Karcher says:

      Only taken ZaNuLab 13 years to get around to doing anything. Too busy paying billions and billions to welfare scroungers ( core vote ) economic migrants ( core vote ) and worthless box filling, spot fining, paper shuffling, public sector employees ( core vote ).

      Oh and of course themselves.

    • 322

      Shouldn’t they be improved based upon the revenue the station actually produces?

      • 375
        I am Sick says:

        “Shouldn’t they be improved based upon the revenue the station actually produces?”

        In a proper market yes, trouble is they are by and large private monopoly holdings and as such, the amount produced is always distorted by lack of meaningful competition.

        My season ticket is up £700 this year, no alternative service provider and no real option other than to pay, or leave my job.

  44. 100
    christy says:

    State opening of parliament,get a eyeful of that hat Mrs Brown is wearing.
    Sorry for being OT.

    • 111
      streamfisher says:

      Not worth the bother of Lillibet getting togged up for it, another load of promises, pledges and guarantees that will never see the light of day anyway thankfully.

  45. 107
    Jason says:

    Point taken, but aren’t these stations are quite big and used mainly by people from outside the constituency they are situated in?

  46. 114
    Help help, here come the bears says:

    Mandelson prefers Cottage Pie with a smear of chutney to large helping of Pork

  47. 116
    Snotty says:

    Just tell ‘em all to fuck off Liz. There’s fuck all in this speech anyway. Flooding?! Hardly the most pressing of issues is it?

    • 124
      The Red Wag says:

      Flooding will take the Canute(*) approach, since there will be no budget.

      *) The 11th century King Canute, or more properly Cnut the Great, commanded the tide to halt and not wet his feet and robes; but the tide failed to stop. The current Great Hoon will no doubt be as successful with his flood and water management bill.

      • 133
        I predict a riot says:

        She was meaning the flooding of money on to the markets,surely?

      • 138
        South of the M4 says:

        The story is often incorrectly told. Canute was, as is Brown, surrounded by sycophants. Unlike Brown, Canute tired of them and wanted to prove that he too was mortal. Canute deliberately used the tide to demonstrate this as he knew that even he could not stop it. His objective was to bring his ‘team’ into the real world and thus prevent the inevitable self-destruction.

        A story often incorrectly told – but clearly relevant to our deluded leader who shows no sign of showing his arse-lickers any reality. In turn, they cannot see it.

        • 148
          Sir William Waad says:

          That’s how Cnut’s adviser Cnampbell Halftroth tried to spin it.

        • 168

          Interesting. We await with interest the spectacle of Brown standing with an unfurled golf umbrella directly beneath the booster rocket of the next shuttle. Nae werries, lads!

        • 243
          Anonymous says:

          I say tie Brown to a chair on Brighton beach and just leave him.

        • 460
          Master Baiter says:

          This is a stupid analogy because unlike Cnut, Gordon Brown can turn back the tide if he wishes, as he proved when saving the world in September last year. That is why he knows that, by passing laws to say that emissions will reduce by 80% by 2050, that children will no longer be poor, and that all old people will have full time carers, these things will come to pass. By contrast the Conservitudes are the do-nothing party – they can’t even trough properly.

  48. 117
    Moriarty says:

    “My government will introduce a Bill to strengthen the law against bribery…”….presumably, thereby, making the Quneens Speech illegal.

  49. 118
    Steve Expat says:

    Queen’s Speech finished already – was only about 10 minutes!!

  50. 119
    Snotty says:

    Fucking hell! It’s finished! 7 minutes long!

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

  51. 120
    Anonymous says:

    “Brown Draws Election Battle Lines”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8364858.stm

    Shame he can only draw U turns.

  52. 122
    ++SKYBREAKINGNEWS++ says:

    ++NEW LABOUR WAR PARTY TAKES QUEEN HOSTAGE++THE QUEEN IS FORCED BY GORDON BROWN TO READ OUT HIS NEW LABOUR WAR PARTY’S ALIBI FOR ITS WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST SOCIETY++QUEEN FORCED TO PROVIDE DIVERSIONARY PROPAGANDA FOR DEEPLY UNPOPULAR NEW LABOUR PARTY++QUEEN SAYS “IRAQ WASSNEE MAH GOOVMUNTS FAL!” SHE ALSO SAYS “GLOOBUL CREESEES NUT MAH GUVMUNT’S FAL EITHAR MUTHA!”++LABOUR PARTY POLITICISES MONARCH++ANOTHER SAD DAY FOR DEMOCRACY UNDER THE NEW LABOUR WAR PARTY++

  53. 126
    Get Smart says:

    £50 million that’s just the consultants fees.

  54. 128
    I predict a riot says:

    Legal obligation to halve the deficit?

    That’s an incredible thing for anyone to even think they can have as legislation.

    Next Brown will be telling Cameron that at least 235 days of each year must be sunny with no rain.

    Crock of bullshit – am I in a dream of some kind – this is total lunacy.

    If Cameron does not demolish this crap,then he deserves to lose.

    • 135
      mondeoman says:

      No it’s a nightmare which has lasted over 12 years, unfortunately we have some time to go but slowly the majority are waking up to the lies – lets hope it is not to late!

    • 137
      I predict totally nothinq wil happen says:

      99% of the Queens Speech will NEVER become law. It’s a total waste of paper. It’s all hypothetical
      It’s the Labour Manifesto for the 2010 election that’s all

      • 151
        Anonymous says:

        Any Liebour manifesto = toilet roll

      • 329
        Minekiller says:

        “Queen’s Speech” = Complete and utter bollocks, oh I loved the commitment to ban cluster munitions (this has already been decided for the UK) thus depriving our armed forces of yet another weapons sytem while at war – and then the commitment to work toward a world free of nuclear weapons -this is code for “Dump all of or part of the Trident system, so we can keep the client and dependent state happy, and hope and pray that the Iranians or Taleban-AQ don’t attack us in some way”.

        What a farce. A NuLiebour raft of more lies and undeliverables designed not for Britian but to derail any incoming government in 2010.

        Really, any government, of any stripes, that came up with that utter tripe should be prosecuted for criminal / professional negligence.

    • 140
      .243 Win says:

      It’s a little like saying that they’ll legislate to abolish breathing.

      Legislate all you like : A statute doesn’t provide a mechanism to ensure that the object of the legislation actually occurs – it’s a paper tiger, totally impractical.

      The real intended effect imho ? A further devaluation of Parliament.

    • 200
      Marxist Soviet Spies says:

      Total bollocks, it’s the right thing to do.

    • 350
      Nick says:

      Half of the proposals are aspirations, and the other half are uncosted give-aways to embarrass the Tories. Practically none of them will pass the Commons in time without a guillotine and the Lords should be able to frustrate progress further.

      I’d also be interested to read the details of

      The bill (that) would also introduce transparency in the workplace to address the differences in pay between men and women

      Harman’s previous suggestions on the matter have included the proposal that women should have access to mens’ salary and employment contract details but not vice versa. That, if implemented could be the basis of a few appeals to the courts…

  55. 136
    Lord Rogers-Fellowes says:

    When I want to hear the Queen speak, I just ring her up.

    • 276
      EIIR says:

      Windsor residence, lady of the house speaking!

      • 355
        nutter says:

        what I wanna know is why the bloody queen didn’t tell brown to fuck off and have them all arrested – thrown into the cells and left to die – yeah, come on, let’s hear it – democracy SHAMOCRACY

      • 358
        Buckingham Palace Telephone Answering Service says:

        Saxe-Coburg-Gotha residence. Frau of the house speaking!

  56. 141
    solopolis says:

    50 million is a very small drop in a very large ocean.

    It’s a poxy amount considering that Network Rail released plans on 13 November for 3.25 BILLION of investment for 2000 rail stations between now and 2014.

    Birmingham New Street, London Kings Cross, and Edinburgh Waverley are expected to receive £100 million EACH.

    Sorry Guido, but I think you and a lot of others have been reeled in by this £50 million hook that has been designed to make Adonis and his Cabinet colleagues look good.

    • 207
      Clarence says:

      “Sorry Guido, but I think you and a lot of others have been reeled in by this £50 million hook that has been designed to make Adonis and his Cabinet colleagues look good.”

      Au contraire: Guido is displaying healthy cynicism and pointing out that this ‘extra investment’ is being trumpeted just prior to the general election campaign; and it appears that this ‘extra investment’ just happens to be aimed predominantly at marginal constituencies. I doubt this ‘extra investment’ will be noticed – it’s just a nice soundbite. Guido, like the rest of this, know this to be the case.

      You will probably find similar announcements (or re-announcements) being made in coming months as the Labour Party uses public funds to support its pre-election campaign. Lots of ‘cash boosts’ for skoolznhospitals that will simply be rehashes of previous announcements and will scarcely amount to a bucket of sand.

      Keep your eyes open too for a barrage of public service adverts on TV: government advertising expenditure will soar in the weeks leading up to the official general election campaign.

      Furthermore, I wonder if Gordon will announce another one-off Council Tax discount just before next year’s election? I mean, that wasn’t a cynical exercise in pre-election bribery, was it?

      • 287
        solopolis says:

        I can agree with that. I was playing double devil’s advocate.

        In that by raising awareness of the £50 million spend it will create more news about it within the blooging and commentating world.

        No such thing as bad publicity and all that.

        • 331
          Clarence says:

          Ah, I misread the tone of your message and on second reading I realised I was echoing your own sentiments.

          Sorry!

  57. 150
    Dr. Richard B says:

    To be fair, six of these stations are in the top 100 by number of passengers 07/08 and there are a couple more in the top 200.

    Warrington at 454 and Wigan NW at 612 are a little further down but they still take 1.5 million passengers a year between them.

    Can’t really be much of a surprise that most of these stations are in Labour seats. I imagine that more than 65% of the UK railways are in Labour consituencies right now.

    It’s not like Reading (in Reading East) is having £400m spent on it

  58. 152
    Russell Brand (Alledgedly) says:

    Listened to a Radio4 programme a few days ago wherein it mentioned that in the 1950s,a then personality stated that it was his ideal Summer’s day to while away a few hours at a certain Train Station.It went on to mourn the passing of such places.A subliminal message being planted,no doubt.

  59. 154
    Steve Expat says:

    Beeb reckon that the Queen said that the national debt will be halved in 5 years’ time.

    Bollocks, she actually said that the annual defecit will be halved in 5 years’ time, ie in 5 years’ time the amount by which the national debt goes up every year will be half what it is now, it’s not scheduled to start coming down for another 10 years at least!

    BIG DIFFERENCE THERE GUYS!

  60. 155
    oldfella says:

    where’s that bloody equalities minister?

    we want equality for our railway stations even if the trains are fucking crap and don’t run or run badly

  61. 160
    The Sleeper says:

    Okay….whilst walking from The Commons to The Lords,Brown and Cameron were having a chat. Brown looked like he was sucking lemons,whilst Cameron talked.

    The only snippet heard of that conversation was Cameron saying..

    “Yes,we’ve had a very good…..”

    Wonder what was he talking about?

    Perhaps….”laugh about your pathetic Parliamentary programme Liz is announcing today”

    Any further thoughts?

    • 216
      Sir William Waad says:

      “…..think about it but Sam finds the ’swinger’ concept a bit sleazy. I hope Sarah won’t be too disappointed.”

    • 225
      The view from says:

      “look at your wife’s grotesque breasts – they like you are a truly sagging phenomenon.”

    • 280
      THX1138 says:

      “..return on buying the gold that you sold off for fuck all. We invested heavily in Zimbabwe dollars, which are doing rather nicely against Sterling. So even if your bunch of mongs get in again, me, the kids and the missus are set up for a cushy life outside of the EUSSR shithole you signed the UK up to”.

  62. 162
    English speaker says:

    Railway station. The expression “train station” is not English.

  63. 164
    Anonymous says:

    What kind of a country uses titles drawn from medieval times? Lord this, Baroness that, Viscount etc. I’d say it was a load of bollocks if it were not so obvious that these so-called titles are yet another way of keeping the foot on the neck of the average person. How can anyone with any morals walk around calling themselves “Lord”? It’s fuckin disgusting.

    • 165
      The Sleeper says:

      At least they’ve got a name..unlike some here.

    • 177
      Lord Rogers-Fellowes says:

      I firmly believe that the lower classes need someone to look up to.

      The Queen is a fine example.

      I wouldn’t put myself in the same class, obviously, since I’m something of an idiot, but my staff are always singing my praises, bless them.

      • 208
        Anonymous says:

        I look up to Prince Charles. It’s his intelligence, wit and sincerity that I particularly admire. Even better is the queen’s husband. No one understands and appreciates the cultures and customs better than that old bigot.

        • 227
          The view from says:

          Ahh – the ROYAL Family;

          Misfits
          Dunces
          Spongers
          Thicko’s
          Not the father’s they are supposed to be….

          The Queen? Fine

          The rest? An embrassment of morons.

    • 211
      Sir William Waad says:

      I wholeheartedly agree. The gentry have always been the backbone of the country, while the aristocracy have been a self-serving luxury product.

    • 214
      caesars wife says:

      Its rather a shame that you cannot see what the pre industrial era was like or think that symbolising it is of any value , I take it you dine at mcdonalds regualry and have all the plastic toys .

    • 239
      Bottle-fed Triplet says:

      We could always have a modern approach like in the US of A. That’s where they call their children Duke or Earl. Then there is their really modern law enforcement bodies with titles like “Marshal” and “Sheriff”. They were really up to date in the Middle ages. Their legislation has titles such as “Governor” and “Senator”. How delightfully Roman!!

      • 341
        Elviswaynechardoney says:

        Yes the USA do use some great names. Did you see Stryker McGuire at the weekend on Sky, bureau chief for Newsweek. Now there’s a name. Strker McGuire. What do we get………….Toilets.

  64. 167
    Broon v Obama Speling Bee contest (he makes Bush look intelligent) says:

    and you’re more likely to get a hospital – look at Gatwick!

  65. 173
    Gordon Brown says:

    I WISH DAVID CAMERON TH EVERY BEST OF LUCK IN THE DEBATE ON THE QUEEN’S SPEECH

    AND I MEAN THAT MOST SINCERELY

  66. 179
    Ghost of Fred Dibnah says:

    Did yo’ lick tha’? So long as the boogers don’t put up the bloody tax on steam coal to pay fer it. Bloody station bars are always bloody shut.

  67. 180
    Engineer says:

    The only one of those stations I have much experience of is Warrington Bank Quay, which could be described (charitably) as ‘functional’. The site is awkward, being thin, and elevated above the access road. There isn’t much space for adequate buildings. The ones in place date from the sixties, and are decidedly ‘tired’. There is (or was – it might have gone now) a large chemical plant, Crossfields, on one side of it. Romantic it ain’t. It badly needs an upgrade.

    I can never quite understand why all the discussion about rail investment focusses on passenger facilities. Post privatisation, the rail freight businesses did very well, to the point where quite a few lines are at capacity, and badly need upgrading. Getting freight off road and onto rail isn’t always possible, but when it can be done, everyone benefits.

    Another point worth lobbing into the discussion is that the entire road system is maintained by the public purse. The rail system relies heavily (though not entirely) on private investment, so economic comparisons are always difficult.

    • 474
      Sukyspook says:

      Indeed Engineer – next down from war (profiting from death and destruction) on the list of despotic, tyrannical fascist behaviours of the ruling mindset, are the various PFI projects which translate as ‘we the people’ paying for the infrastructure and any resultant investment shortfalls – ‘they’, the corporations/bankster-gangsters reap the profits. Nice work if you’re evil enough to live that way… Don’t forget that if anything goes wrong or further investment is required – we’ll always be there – idiots that we are.

  68. 182
    Anonymous says:

    Crewe station is supposed to be relocating,perhaps this has now been scrapped?

    • 197
      Edwin Clayhanger says:

      No it’s going ahead – It’s just that it’s now being re-located to Stoke-on-Trent as the government need to put “shit-loads” of money into the “Six Towns” to counter the rise of the party with no name and the fact that for decades they took the Labour vote has a “dead cert”

    • 206
      Sir William Waad says:

      Yes, they realised it would be better to keep it near the railway.

  69. 193
    Percy says:

    This little piggy went to market, this little piggy went to market, this little piggy went to market, this little piggy went to market, this little piggy went to market…. and so on for another few hundred times…

  70. 203
    Help help, here come the bears says:

    Brown draws battle lines and draws a little mud in his M&S knickers

  71. 204
    Stepney says:

    Guido – I’d STRONGLY suggest you do the same analysis on those constituencies in which the “relaxing” of the Green Belt and Planning processes are imminent.

    Crikey – talk about getting your retaliation in early!

    • 472
      Sukyspook says:

      Ah yes, ‘relaxing the greenbelt’ translates as ch chiiiiiinnnngggggg £££££££££££!

  72. 205
    BillyBob poops on ZaNuLab says:

    Labour….. what a load of bollocks

  73. 209
    caesars wife says:

    Cripes fawkes made it on aljabeeba on queens speech day , move over robinson !

    Ruin probebly enjoyed queens speech , “my government is going to fo more about reform of the second chamber” it was a political queens speech which he no doubt thinks will give him some sort of edge of the success of the reformers , CW knows that the ruins bust can be translated into wasting wealth for pretty much most of the time he was in offce , as for equality i think you will find most people would prefer respect and community , given hes turned out more ferral loons than any other governement , equality !

    CW enjoyed earleir post its the ruins Alibi , spot on

  74. 212

    Labour and the BBC are a sick joke. A bill to abolish child poverty? I thought Labour already did that? And how do you abolish child poverty when your definition relates tot he media? It isnt’ about abolishing child poverty, it’s about abolishing difference. And how? And how are they going to do everything else? And how dare they try to bind future parliaments? And *why* are the BBC taking this at all seriously? I bet they won’t even publish all the bloody bills, let along get them through the house.

    Oh why am I even bothering. This is the sorriest pile of idiotic wishful thinking and plain fucking wank I’ve ever had the misfortune to read. I dont’ give a shite what Labour say or do, I’m simply not interested in their claims, ambitions, spin, policies. I just want them all fucking dead. I want to see their corpses twirling in the breeze, surrounded by hungry crows.

    Dead dead dead. Torn to fucking shreds. That’ll do. Anything else, Im not bothered with.

    Let’s see Queenie sitting for ten minutes listing the methods of torture and execution to be reintroduced for the crime of Treason. I’d pay to listen to that.

    “My government will be taken from this place to a place of public execution, there to be hung by the neck until they are very very dead indeed”

    • 231
      caesars wife says:

      they are not supposed to lie are they , thats what gets me , all the system of on your honour has been totally corrupted from when balir got in , for wonk EU waste of money , cant stomach it when they tell you its an improvement , any normal circumstances he should have resigned and appologised for busting country.

      Cw has no intention of letting labour get away with it

    • 235
      TV Writes says:

      Brown to be hanged very slowly indeed – could sell the TV rights to the Taliban for £180Bn.

    • 242
      Jolyon Wagg says:

      * applause *

    • 330
      Rip Van Winkle says:

      It’s just fucking nonsense.

      Just like the previous 12 years. Except the Mr and Mrs Average Joe are so bloody average they can’t see throught it.

      Munters.

  75. 219
    Blurrghargh! says:

    From the sound of her, I think Her Maj was trying very hard to stop the gag reflex every time she had to say the words “my Government”. They make me feel sick.

  76. 226
    Fabian Solutions says:

    If you want you see whats instore for Britan if the poison fucker gets in again google this

    Christopher Newsom / Channon Christian murders.

    i bet you never heard about that one, thanks to the poison bastard these acts will never get reported here and the reason is that the victims were white, when the victim is black we never hear the fucking end of it.

    • 240
      The Sentence says:

      At the least they have the death sentence – why has The Queen not sentenced Brown to death for treason?

  77. 236
    Dave "Cast Iron Guarantee" Cameron says:

    I am furious that no mention of John & Edward Grimes (Jedward) was made in the Queens Speech.

    I will be bringing this matter up in the House later this afternoon and don’t give a flying fuck if my face turns red with anger either

    • 259
      Gordon 'iron cast' Brown says:

      “I will be bringing this matter up in the House…”

      Sounds like another Brown Bogey day.

  78. 246
    Anonymous says:

    The train now standing at platforms 3,4,5 and 6 came in sideways.

  79. 247
    Here come the Cavalry says:

    There are moves underway for a people’s demonstration in early December – details from the web talking about a Wednesday in the first week – 2nd or 9th?

    • 267
      Sir William Waad says:

      A demonstration of what?

      • 278
        And now, a demonstration. says:

        The latest Dyson vacuum cleaner evidently.

        Cleans up corruption within seconds,safely storing it in it’s patented cyclone chamber for release in a safe place like er,Italy.

    • 286
      nearly says:

      “There are moves underway for a people’s demonstration in early December – ”

      more info please

      • 305
        Watchful says:

        I heard this too from a workmate in West London – seems to be about Afghanistan from what she was saying.

  80. 251
    streamfisher says:

    Now look at my banburies all over the floor!

  81. 254
    Gordon Brown says:

    When someone next says to you “See You Next Tuesday” ie C.U.N.T. acronym which is quite offensive –

    Reply “Tuesday, Wednesday And Thursday” ie T.W.A.T. acronym! You’ll have the last laugh

    Who was it said that Prime Minister’s don’t have a sense of humour ??

  82. 255
    Richard Blogger says:

    Most of labour’s seats are in inner cities (where railway stations are) and most Tories seats are in the shires and suburbs (and Dr Beeching removed their stations decades ago).

    This is a non-story. Try again Guido.

  83. 261
    THX1138 says:

    The whole speech stinks like the commies abolishing unemployment.

    Have they NO idea how much they are detested?

    How many Millibandesque slop buckets will be emptied over Labour canvassers’ heads?

  84. 267
    Jonah curse alert says:

    The Mclaren Formula 1 Team have just confirmed that world champoin Jenson Button will be joining them next season alongside former world champion Lewis Hamilton.

    Two world champions, two Englishmen in an English team based in England.

    For fucks sake no one tell McDoom!

    • 282
      Brown the communist spy. says:

      Wash your mouth out!

      There is no such thing as English.

      Under the direction of my spymasters in Moscow,I have abolished the mere mention of England.

      White scum.

    • 326
      Mr Plum says:

      English doing well at sport.
      Say goodbye to watching it on the Beeb & freeview

    • 416
      Jack Straw says:

      England must be ethnically cleansed, the English must be replaced as soon as possible with more compliant serfs. As I have always maintained, the English are not worth saving as a race.

  85. 270
    libertarian says:

    You might want to look at where Labour are proposing to build the 18 new Nuclear power stations too.

    Dungerness has had a nuclear power station for 40 years but can’t have a replacement. Oh it’s a solid tory seat …silly me

  86. 274
    Draft Crunt says:

    Didn’t the same thing happen with new hospitals? Every one went to a Labour controlled area.

    • 310
      Broon v Obama Speling Bee contest (he makes Bush look intelligent) says:

      yes – and if you look at gatwick you will see that if there was an incident there you will have to travel quite far.
      as i have said before you need to look also at mp’s who own land and what potentially might be built on it.

    • 311
      thick as thieves says:

      new labour are an elective dictatorship.
      focusing resources in a self serving manner is what elective dictatorships do to re-inforce their position.
      in the case of new labour, they have focused resources on the benefits class. indeed, for the last decade new labour have been expanding the benefit class. if you threaten claimants payments then they will not vote for you. they will get up off their backsides to vote against anyone who want to reduce their money.
      now, I don’t normally like to offer advice to the SCUM TORIES but I do like to see a fair fight, so the tories should listen closely to top boy for he has a message for them:
      benefit claimants are the swing vote in this election.
      unpalatable but true.
      therefore if david cameron wants to win the next election then he will have to guarantee the claimants that he will not reduce their money.
      as we are in recession that is not a totally disastrous position to take, it is in fact quite a good position. people need help at this time.
      and in fairness, should the tories get to decide policy, then they will need a period of two or three years to figure out a better benefit. they will also need time to figure out how to dismantle the over complex clusterfuck benefit system brown set up.
      politically speaking, gordon brown is leaving a fucking mess behind.
      my concern is that I don not believe for one moment that the tories are capable of cleaning brown’s mess up.
      cameron and his shadow cabinet have been useless in opposition therefore they will be useless in government.
      it is not rocket science, is it?
      FUCK DAVE AND GORDON – THEY ARE C’UNTS
      VOTE INDEPENDENT – VOTE DEMOCRACY

  87. 279
    Jimmy says:

    So what major railheads in tory constituencies were left out?

    • 379
      Australian says:

      Guildford.

      Was supposed to have been thoroughly overhauled but now seems to have fallen a long way down the list.

  88. 284
    The Queen says:

    Honestly, the crap I’m asked to read out loud…………………….f’kin disgusting!

    • 381
      Australian says:

      HM – just a suggestion. Why not get your husband Phil to stand in for you and read the speech. I am sure he would add some suitably colourful commentary to it!

  89. 296
    RestandBthankful says:

    The Queen …. that’s exactly what I was thinking as I watched her Majesty reading that utter garbage today. I visualised her throwing the papers aside and saying – that’s it, no more will I utter this rubbish.

    Good to see you on the News channel Guido – thankfully that silly protestor was nowhere to be seen unlike when Vince Gable was on – so funny (the protestor and NOT Gable).

  90. 297
    Old Nick Heavenly(real dimwit) says:

    O/T

    Wonderful article in the Teletubbygrub about 10 good reasons to hate the Brits, written by my wonderful neighbours, the Belgians.

    Wonderful stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  91. 298
    Gordon Brown says:

    I am now able to tell the electorate the gag that Dave Cameron told to me while we filed into the Chamber for the Queen’s Speech

    “Father! Father! An old man on crutches walked up to the holy water a minute ago, and he splashed some on his right leg and then he threw away his right crutch! Then he splashed some more on the other leg and threw away his left crutch!” “My boy, you’ve witnessed a miracle! What happened then?” “He fell on his arse!”

    It’s rather good and will receive cross party support in due course.

    • 307
      The joke's on him says:

      Heard the joke about Brown?

      He died.

    • 385
      Australian says:

      290: Please don’t put perfectly good Catholic jokes into the mouth of the Scum of the Manse, thank you.

      “We dinna haev jokes or evil jollity in thae Manse”

  92. 300
    RestandBthankful says:

    How can a new law half the deficit?

  93. 308
    El Precedente Elect, Msgnr. Phoney Bliar, the EUSSR's biggest * * * * oppo to the Weird Witchy Woman says:

    Tomorrow is my Big Day.

    I’ve waited long enough.

    And it’ll shut up her wiv the big gob.

    EUSSR Dave says

    I think Tone has done ever so well for himself, – don’t you?

  94. 313
    Scan says:

    It’s true…Wakefield’s getting a huge revamp. It’s probably worth more than the city itself…which doesn’t take much.

    • 318
      Old Lag says:

      It’s the Prison wot done it for Wakefield guv – gotta look good for the high profiles innit

    • 343
      Minekiller says:

      I worked from Wakefield briefly in the early 1990s and the Railway Station was the best part as it had a means of transport to get away from the place.

  95. 314
    The Joker says:

    What do you call a person who

    (a) cannot accept responsibility

    (b) will not accept responsibility

    (c) has extremely limited comprehension of economics (‘n that)

    (d) has extremely limited understanding of economics (‘n that)

    (e) has scant understanding of the meaning of ‘Truth’ . . .

    (f) . . and even less regard for it

    (g) is an habitable liar, thief, and wastrel

    etc . .

    Answer (clue : it’s the colour of shit)

    • 317
      Everton Mint says:

      David Cast Iron Cammeron

    • 348
      Porky Pies MP says:

      That just about describes many politicians of whatever party but probably David Chameleon more than most (apart from the rather childish colour of shit).

  96. 338
    Gordon_Practising_Scowls says:

    I see MacGordon has his train set out again to play with. I bet Crewe station is a run-through.

  97. 340
    Anonymous says:

    jesus there are some scary people in the world. How are you people allowed to vote? Prior to my arrival there was less than one brain cell amongst these reponses… hahahaha

  98. 356
    Red Flag Act says:

    Guido thinks it won’t save Moran in Luton. I’m hoping it won’t save Coffey in Stockport. She’s USELESS! Not everyone in a liebour constituency is dumb enough to vote for them.

  99. 359
    ONE LAST PUSH FOR LABOUR says:

    We have got to fight for what we want, for all that we believe, It’s right to fight for what we want, to live the way we please. As long as we have done our best then no one can do more, and life and love and Labour are well worth fighting for.

    And we should never count the cost or worry that we’ll fall, It’s better to have fought and lost, than not have fought at all

    Let’s always take whatever comes and never try to hide face everything and anyone together side by side

    As long as we have done our best then no one can do more

  100. 362

    Thank fuck, Clapham needs it..

  101. 364
    Mrs Valerie Parnham says:

    This is the first time I have looked at this “blog” and I am truely appalled by the bad language

    • 377
      thick as thieves says:

      good.
      now fuck off.
      thankyou.

    • 378
      Fucking swearing bastard cunt says:

      so am I, Mrs Parnham

      what shall we fucking do?

    • 383
      Ig Noramus says:

      Read between the lines……it’s much worse than you first think.

      But if you are as lillywhite as you would have us believe you will not get the nuances.

      Stay for a few days and ignore the dross. There are many well informed bloggers on here.

    • 393
      Australian says:

      Mrs Val:
      “I am truely appalled by the bad language”

      … and we are TRULY appalled by your bad spelling. Welcome anyway – you will get used to it!

    • 397
      simon r says:

      You think the langauge is bad, just wait until you see the crap cartoons on a Monday.

    • 423
      Lizzie says:

      Yes on this blog there is very little decorum, some anger, some nonsense and some good debate.

      • 438

        There is way too much fucking swearing though

        • 452
          Under a flower pot at the bottom of the garden until that c'nt brown calls the General Election says:

          No there fucking isn’t

        • 465
          Lizzie says:

          Yes, you are probably right FrankFisher, there are a lot of people on this blog possibly suffering from Tourettes Syndrome.

          • I Have Tourettes says:

            FUCK YOU! FUCK OFF C’UNT!
            SOAPY-TIT WANK JESUS YES!!!
            FUCKING SLUT! TIT-WANK PLEASE!
            WHORE!

          • Garden Brin says:

            I agree its a tad rude and I shall for one will tut very loudly in private. Just a thought I haven’t had a soapy titty w@@k for yonks , must get out more………

    • 470
      City of Vice says:

      Fuck off then. And don’t let your fat arse hit the door on the way out…

  102. 373
    Thomas the Tank Engine says:

    It seems clear then that NuLabour is heading for the buffers.

  103. 391
    Snuggles says:

    Adonis wants to build a high speed railway line(about time too) but he wants another PFI scheme), and also last time I looked the country was currently was broke. The transport budget is going to get cut as it is quite easy for the government to do it(look at all the cancelled tram systems for the major cities Liverpool, etc).

    If you think that the south has good rail infrastructure should know that the trains in the southern region still run on third rail electrical power not overhead like most lines north of Watford. There are also very few express services(like the Intercity 125) in the southern region(only the Javelin service which is very limited and maybe Brighton to London). Until quite recently the south had slam door rolling stock!

    Both parties haven’t served the railways well. Prescott’s 10 year transport plan was good wasn’t it? Yup like most of he does! The Tories have royally mucking our system(splitting it into a million little bits) privatisation has been a disaster for the railways. Where is the new investment? Most of the money goes off to the managers and shareholders, and ironically we spend more money now on rail subsidy than we did under British rail. We have lost two of our train building companies in York and Birmingham(mainly due to privatisation because it held up train replacement programme). The only thing that would be good in the private sector is the freight side, even that is held up as the plan a couple of years ago for a great central freight railway and taking off some of the congestion on the M6 and using the channel tunnel fell through under Prescott’s time at the Transport job.

  104. 396
    nutty slack says:

    am I correct in my understanding that there are only 33 parliamentary days in the next session due to holidays, erm more holidays and various breaks plus champions league football – so how the fuck is any of this going to happen??

  105. 403
    Damien's Y-Fronts says:

    Does Margaret Hodge support endangered species such as the ‘Web Footed Barking Bollocks’, er..I say fuck ‘em as she is to be an endangered species – the ‘Troughing Labour Member’!!

  106. 409
    Mr Plum says:

    Great speech from Cameron, brown looks like crap

  107. 415
    Lizzie says:

    The gravy train is on time in all of the stations listed. Cameron was on top form this afternoon in the House. I have not got the patience to listen to Brown. Animal lovers must be cringing over the loss of all the ermine and mink in the last twelve years, Cameron said ” stoats for goats”, I had a good laugh, although the wait for a General Election is not so funny.

  108. 417
    Colonel Nut says:

    Labour have made enough scamming on the gravy train to do up all the stations but who’ll be loco enough to vote for them?Even in Margaret Hodges contituency they’re not all barking.

    • 422
      fido says:

      I am gruffffruffff rrrraaawwwwllllll grrruffffff yyeeeelllppppppppppppp yyyaaaaaapppppp sausages

      • 432
        Colonel Nut says:

        Good boy Fido,well said.You make more sense than New Labour but remember that remarks about sausages might alienate Moslem voters.

  109. 420
    alan freeman says:

    Train Leaves Here This Morning – Gene Clark – top of da pops, poppickers

  110. 425
    Lizzie says:

    Adam Bouton said Cameron held back on any killer blow! Boulton is probably hoping for a few mince pies in the bunker at this xmas do, that is if they can afford any do’s this year.

  111. 426
    Master Baiter says:

    Missed Cameo’s appearance, Brown’s speech a peach.

  112. 434
    Anonymous says:

    It wont save Martin Linton either!

  113. 435
    Nu Libore - new mother-fuckers says:

    It happens at local level too. The districts where the evil Nu Liebore kleptocrats live, have clean streets, manicured public grass areas, and well maintained streets. Whereas areas that don’t vote Nu Liebore have filthy streets, pot-holed roads, and dog shite all over the place.

    • 468
      One eyed gibbering son of snot. says:

      It’s part of our fairer britain. Fairer to those who vote for us. It is the right thing to do.

  114. 437
    Ruth Kelly's plaything says:

    Guido, many, many thanks for doing the analysis – I’d suspected as much when I heard the news but haven’t had time to check the politics of the lucky recipient towns myself.

    Can anyone (even NuLab trolls) tell me exactly what is the moral basis for a government that relieves me of money by menaces and then gives it to their friends?

    NuLab = Mafia

    NuLab = tribalism

    NuLab = liars, swindlers, thieves and illegal warmongers

  115. 440
    Record collector says:

    lord I made it to the station
    with my suitcase in my hand
    walked up to the window like a natrl born man
    said I sure do hope
    that choo choo train runs on time
    (ozark mountain daredevils)

  116. 449
    Record collector says:

  117. 451
    MB. says:

    I see there are several comments around that it is not new money just shuffling around Network Rail’s existing budget.

    Someone on a railway forum commented that some of the station managers could not understand why they had been chosen and everyone seemed to realise that it was just electioneering.

  118. 453
    Record collector says:

    trains are and have been of major importance to our way of life. Wiki lists the songs related to trains, there’s hundreds of ‘em

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_train_songs

    probably more, they’re not just about transport, for some they’re a way of life……..

  119. 467
    Ratsniffer says:

    Stinking NuMarxists trying to buy votes again. Desperation.

  120. 469

    Stockport Station has had a major revamp in the last 5 years. If that has failed to get it out of the worst 10 in the country, what is the good of the same people throwing another few million quid at it.
    Didn’t the Labour Left keep on chanting on about the real issues? In a modern secular society has the opiate that keeps society in its place the silver tongue of the Lord Almighty?

  121. 491
    Anonymous says:

    Here was me thinking pork sales were down because of all the foreigners Labour has let in!!

  122. 493
    Garden Brin says:

    The 2 million pledged for Cockermouth is a insult to the people affected by the floods, I wonder how much RBS is going lavish on their Christmas party next month at our expense!!!! Great people and a great town Cockermouth the best of luck to you from the West Mids.







Sarah Palin said…

“A year later, I gotta ask the supporters of all that, ‘How’s that hopey, changey thing working out for ya?’ “



-Gilts (Mar)
As of 28 Jan 2010 +5.8%

Realtime Portfolio Record


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives









RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive



Labels Guido Reads