Comments on: Nadine Wins Substantial Settlement from Damian

By: Biffo

Biffo — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:57:57 +0000

Unfortunately for your case for the McBride defence, I don’t think his email was hacked. I’ve heard that someone on the circulation list decided that what McBride & Drooper were planning was just a bit too vile & blew the whistle.

Incidentally, has it been decided who is the Dad of Kate G’s second child?

By: Biffo

Biffo — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:51:54 +0000

Obviously not stringent enough!

By: Biffo

Biffo — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:45:37 +0000

Unfortunately, Drooper was being ‘managed’by the govt (McBride in Gordon’s own Control Room at No 10) so he didn’t let them down – they let themselves down. No change there then.
And they expect us to believe that Gordoom, Control Freak Extraordinaire, perched (slumped) in his Control Room knew nothing about it? Pull the other one.

By: Nadine v HM Government - Guy Fawkes' blog

Nadine v HM Government - Guy Fawkes' blog — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:50:57 +0000

[...] While Nadine Dorries has settled her claim for libel against Damian McBride (with Damian having to pay legal costs including for Guido’s time spent serving him with the papers) she has not yet settled her [...]

By: Jim Beam

Jim Beam — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:38:24 +0000

Is it true that the NEW MAN NONCE’s (Bliar) chances of becoming the next Euro fuhrer are fading rapidly? Maybe there is a god after all!!!!

By: Jim Beam

Jim Beam — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:03:16 +0000

Nadine Dorries is top totty for men of a certain age. More to the point you should see her daughter who is a total babe. Like Mother like Daughter!
Guido I would like to nominate both of them for totty watch. Any chance????

By: tat

tat — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:48:21 +0000

mentalist: don’t copy my stuff or I will cave your skull in.
you fucking sap.

By: Pope Leo 5th

Pope Leo 5th — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:52:00 +0000

I really couldn’t care less about the legal definition of substantial and I’m not going to trawl through 600 comments to keep muppets like you happy.

Fact is she could have got a lot more than £1K in court for the accusations made by McBride. Either the £1K figure is wrong or the lawyers discovered a hole in her case. Either outcome is possible and I haven’t seen any proof one way or the other.

By: Pope Leo 5th

Pope Leo 5th — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:48:18 +0000

Nadine is a loon.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:47:42 +0000

““Substantial” is a legal term”

You mean like a “Blaney’s Blarney Order”?

Maybe it will catch on, as in “I told him an Archer was too much so we haggled it down to a Substantial.”