Comments on: Osborne’s Command and Control Economics

By: btaylor

btaylor — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:54:29 +0000

What other industry steals investors funds and call it a “Bonus”

Depositors earn no interest so why don’t Banks pay them a “bonus” of say 5% on deposits.

By: Ian Dales

Ian Dales — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:24:00 +0000

You think crowing about how do you fucked off when things weren’t exactly to your taste is laudable in any way?

By: Trembling Tina

Trembling Tina — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:41:39 +0000

depends on which one has the biggest dick…

By: Fucking delicious!

Fucking delicious! — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:40:20 +0000

And bankers know about banking do they?

You’re another fuck-witted fud; if you twats don’t want to lose your ‘bonuses’, then fuck off and find another ponzi scheme – sorry ‘bank’ – who will pay all you underpaid ‘Bastards of the Universe’ exactly that which you believe they are worth.

Tip: you’re worth absolutely fuck all; either to me or society as a whole…

Fucking delicious!

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:25:31 +0000

Unfortunately people don’t often leave to work in other countries just for the money. I know I was tempted to vote Labour when Jim Davidson, etc. promised they would leave but they bloody well stayed.

Banking crowds out other sectors in this country in the same way the public sector expansion has. Reducing our reliance on banking would be no bad thing in the long term, however, in the short term we should allow the sector to grow taxable profits to pay off our debts and this time remember to turn off the porridge pot before we get flooded again by the next financial crisis.

By: Fucking delicious!

Fucking delicious! — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:23:32 +0000

You really are the thickest, most pretentious, fuckwittted imbecile that posts on this right-wing window licker’s blog. You are a boring piece of bog-roll; no wonder your missus fucked off with the Big Issue seller.

The bankers need duouble-tapping, just like you…

Fucking delicious!

By: Trembling Tina

Trembling Tina — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:15:08 +0000

Peter dear, all I see of your responses is being rude and dismissive of other people’s views. Perhaps it would be more enlightening to the rest of us if you put forward your reasons as to why the other person, in your humble opinion, is incorrect.

kiss kiss

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:40:41 +0000

Right, so all those shoplifters wouldn’t have been doing so much shoplifting if only they hadn’t been given the opportunity to shoplift by having so many shops. Down with the grocers.

By: Guido Fawkes Defends Bankers’ Free Lunch | Think Politics Blog

Guido Fawkes Defends Bankers’ Free Lunch | Think Politics Blog — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:01:16 +0000

[...] is brilliant as a spiky muckraker and purveyor of parliamentary plots. Less endearing are his efforts to defend the obscene and wholly undeserved bonuses being awarded to bankers. Guido doesn’t seem to get it at [...]

By: Peter Grimes

Peter Grimes — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:51:37 +0000

Hooray for the Bankers – have you ever stopped to consider what the ‘c’ is in all of those acronyms for derivatives which you bandy about as though you were other than totally ignorant about them?

(And it isn’t the c.nut that you make yourself either!)