September 30th, 2009

Timing is Everything

Labour's Lost the SunThe Sun stopped backing Labour the day Blair left Downing Street, today they formalised their position and came to a testy accommodation with David Cameron, merely giving him a grudging endorsement.

The Sun is ur-Thatcherite in outlook, reflecting the true beliefs of Rupert Murdoch, who does not deny acting as atraditional proprietorsetting the editorial direction of the tabloid.  Murdoch liked Blair’s hawkishness and is suspicious of Cameron’s timidity on economics.  Trevor Kavanagh is also less than impressed with Cameron, don’t forget when Gordon became PM he predicted that Brown would win the next general election and “win big”.  The Sun is fallible.

The support of The Sun is conditional, Murdoch wants an authentically radical policy agenda.  Cameron is promising only half that agenda.

People who think Andy Coulson is overpaid should reflect on the timing of The Sun’s endorsement. At the most neuralgic point for Labour, in the midst of Mandelson trying to change the media narrative, when party morale just blipped up from flat-lining, The Sun disrupts the storyline.

Spin is about timing, a story works best in the right context, at the right time.  Andy Coulson knows a good headline, it is his sense of timing that is priceless.   Guido will bet a currant bun that Coulson suggested to his successor on the “Bizarre” column, Dominic Mohan, the new Sun editor, that the night of Brown’s fightback speech might be the best time to knock him back to maximum effect.


500 Comments

  1. 1
    Trevor of Kent says:

    Are they attacking Brown, Labour or both?

    • 11
      The Sun's Political Editor Tervor Kavanagh says:

      PHWOOOOAAR!!! LOOK AT THE BIG BOUNCY TITTTIES!!!

      what’s that Mr Murdoch ? yes I’m writing it down for the front page now.. and can I clean your arse with my tongue while I’m at it ? No, no problem at all. The usual place then and I’ll assume the position.

      • 17
        Heir-to-Blair says:

        Why the surprise ?

        The Sun sorry, Murdoch backed Blair so he’s still backing Blair 2.0
        Hard to believe anyone could be more lightweight than Blair but Dave manages it

        • 26
          The Sun says:

          gigantic bouncing booberama!!!

        • 431
          Only slightly plumper than average says:

          I disagree, Guido. The timing is wrong for a piece of politics & I guess it’s got more to do with News International’s business politics.

          Brown’s speech was bad enough to have tanked the party all by itself – Paxman was for once superb on the complete absence of credible content – and the way that the PM was shredded on the morning interviews was evidence enough that there’s nothing left in the bank.

          Although it’s bad for labour, it would have done more damage for the debate to have run for a few days with Labour finding out the hard way that Brown’s speech hadn’t cut it at all.

          I don’t think Coulson would have wanted the Sun to have gone this early; it actually gets in the way of a Labour implosion. I’d have preferred this to be the story eitehr the day afer Cameron’s speech or the day that Brown or his replacement called the election.

          The general debate is now about the Sun and its influence not about Labour and its collapse. If I were Coulson, I would have wanted an endorsement directly on the back of the Conservative conference, a positive choice rather than a despairing one.

          Unless of course, either of them has got something else up their sleeve.

          • Erich Honecker says:

            The parade of the living dead literally had my toes curling. What were your highlights? The full frontal close ups of the grotesque Kinnocks, imbecilic thieves, or perhaps the cadaverous leering Straw? Broon’s bovine, unprincipled ‘wife’? Obersturmfuhrer Mandleslime? We need a fucking poll.

      • 89
        The Great Leader says:

        That’s REALLY funny!

        Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!

        • 97
          Scenic says:

          Do you fear lady bumps?

          • The Sun says:

            LOOK AT THE TITS!!!

            We love tits at the Sun.
            Just look at who we’ve had editing this piece of shit.

          • My word! This news does seem to have upset the trolls at the NuLabour Rebuttal and Astroturfing Unit.

            Personally I wonder whether Murdoch’s decision is as groundbreaking as is being made out. He likes to act the “big influential newspaper tycoon”, but in reality he’s just another salesman hawking his wares round the market.

            The public has turned against Brown and NuLabour – are they honestly going to continue buying a paper that carries on supporting him whatever the quality and quantity of the tits?

          • Anonymous says:

            you think it’s only NuLiebore who think The Sun is a pile of shit ?
            Please! don’t embarrass yourself

            shit is shit

            if you read Mr Fawkes intro you would have realised these Sun fuckwits predicted that Brown would win the next general election and “win big”.

        • 103
          Murdochs little shit-eaters says:

          Sun ‘readers’ probably do have to write out Ha Ha Ha as they certainly can’t read the paper without moving their lips

          • Anonymous says:

            They may well do, but they’ll also play a big part in kicking Brown and his band of merry morons out of government, so don’t knock ‘em too much.

          • Scenic says:

            Its that Labour attitude of hatred for the English working class that will see them consigned to the dustbin of political history – they just never completed the plan to replace the working class with Muslims quickly enough.

          • Anonymous says:

            The working class don’t read the Sun for Politics they read it for backpage sport and entertainment gossip.

          • Scenic says:

            You have just reconfirmed your sneering new Labour attitude to them.

          • JKL says:

            Labour has it’s horrible pro-Islam appeasment policy to partly thank for this.

            Let’s hope the conservatives take the correct action.

          • Anonymous says:

            I happily sneer at the tiny minority of tattooed skin’ead rottweiler wielding chavs voting for fat bumboy Griffin but the majority of the working class are smart enough not to get their politics from a titrag

            so in that regard they are infinitely more politically savvy then you

          • Scenic says:

            The Sun has a daily readership of 8 million, so thats one sixth of the UK written off as rottweiler wielding chavs. And not sure why they would vote for Griffin as the Sun is the most vociferous paper around in its opposition to the BNP?

          • Mongrel says:

            You wish, Anonymous, you wish. Whether we like it or not, and as it happens I don’t, there will be a significant minority of Sun readers who are influenced by their simple political comments. Should take Zanu down to about 21-23% in the polls and a comfortable third place unless the LIbDems go along with Gordon’s overtures.

        • 225
          lancet says:

          “We love tits at the Sun.
          Just look at who we’ve had editing this piece of shit.”

          Sounds like you’re shit scare you hysterical twat.

          • Murdochs little shit-eaters says:

            Fuck off dickweed

            Mordochs Sun editors are world class morons

            Rebekah Wade turned down the expenses disk and the new tit Mohan was the celeb gossip queen on the Bizarre pages for fucks sake

            here’s one of Dominics more amusing quotes
            “I’m going to pucker up and admit it -yes, I kiss men.”
            Sounds very metrosexual and Cameroonian of him doesn’t it ?

          • Anonymous says:

            Does Mohan bat for the other side?

          • Who idea was the pink backdrop ? says:

            My ENEMIES ENEMY IS MY FRIEND

      • 196
        Archie says:

        Yes, quite so, Guido old fruit, but sensible fellow that you are, cannot you see that Murdoch has his own, highly dubious, agenda?
        Items: foreigner, republican, anti-Establishment, anti-monarchy, non-British resident, non-British citizen, etc. I for one will never buy a Murdoch owned medium.
        Were I asked to fault the Thatcher years, my immediate response would be the selling off of our assets to dodgy foreigners, BAA, The Times, Sun, etc.

        • 444
          WobblyJim says:

          Globalisation is Murdoch’s agenda.
          Thankfully it is looking like the world is realising exactly what globalisation means and is pushing back.

          Logically – Globalisation means that one person will eventually own everything.

    • 13
      Ken Lorp says:

      All those Lib-Dem friendly policies are McMentalists kiss of death for that party. Vote for Lib-Dem, get Labour. Any wavering Tory who may have thought about voting Lib Dem will now run back to the waiting arms of Cameron.

      How many seats will the Lib-Dems lose after this?

      • 90
        Anonymous says:

        did you somehow miss the comparisons to the B&P “Gulags for slags” here ?

        I’ll give you a hand. It was the big story BEFORE this one.
        Don’t think the cuddly Libs will think much of that one.

    • 15

      They should have changed the headline to “Labour’s lost tit” with an arrow pointing at Gordon Brown and the word “tit” written on his forehead.

      And hopefully Sophie Howard somewhere inside the newspaper. I would buy that issue.

      • 86
        Sukyspook says:

        “They should have changed the headline to “Labour’s lost tit” with an arrow pointing at Gordon Brown and the word “tit” written on his forehead.”

        When can you start Ashley, Monday ok??

        Love, Rupy mwa mwa

      • 186

        Headline

        “See inside for the biggest Tits in Britain!: Exclusive coverage of the Labour Party conference”.

    • 24
      Ed Miliband ties himself in Knots defending Gordon says:

      Look at this classic produced by Paxman and Ed Miliband last night. Paxman asks straight forward questions, Ed Miliband tries to answer them honestly. Problem being Miliband is trying to defend Gordon’s dishonest speech. The result is a sheer delight…warning not for those of a nervous disposition

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n46fm/Newsnight_29_09_2009/

      • 27
        Ed Miliband ties himself in Knots defending Gordon says:

        PS view from minute 12.

        http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n46fm/Newsnight_29_09_2009/

        • 35
          .243 Win says:

          Car crash TV…

          • Labour's Dead says:

            Paxman made Miliband look the stupid myopic air-head schoolboy that he really is.

            Best interview Ive seen in ages. Paxman did spare him his life. I think he could have easily finished him off !

          • jgm2 says:

            When he had Miliband on the ropes over this ‘promise of a referendum in the forthcoming manifesto’ why didn’t he finish him off by simply declaring that Labour manifesto commitments are worthless. Why would any sane voter believe you?

            You promised a referendum on PR in the 1997 manifesto and you reneged. You had no reason. You had a massive majority and a manifesto commitment and you reneged. Why would anybody believe a single word you say?

            Just flat out call ‘em a party of liars. Which is what they are.

          • One flew over the No 10 bunker says:

            at 21.07 he states we should not take the British people for granted.

            Yeah right!

          • Anonymous says:

            Paxman only finishes people off if they’re tories.

          • Brown's a Tosser says:

            My god these are the people we have running the country. Ed Miliband looked like what he is a fresh face lightweight just out of nappies. New policies what a joke this all is and you can tell none of them believe what they are saying.

          • Osama the Nazarene says:

            jgm2 agree 100%.

        • 59

          Unwatchable, he clearly isn’t too comfortable about defending the indefensible!

        • 83
          Dr WOlf says:

          My file is corrupt, all I get is Shakira’s arse. Bonus.

        • 93

          All I got was some saucy popstrel singing.

          More please!

        • 101
          TheCourtOfPublicOpinion says:

          That was almost as painful as watching Joanna Lumley dictate government policy live on TV whilst Woolas nodded it all along during the Ghurkas fiasco.

        • 128
          Anonymous says:

          Clearly a “must see” for politics watchers, cringing stuff.

        • 213
          Ivor Schwartzporsche says:

          Thanks for the video link. you will see the trademark bogie stuck to the edge of the lecturn at 4:17

        • 319
          Don't ask me,I'm only a Minister! says:

          The crap re 16/17 yr old pregnant girls is simply breathtaking – £30M support – that wouldn’t support more than a couple of hostels in one town.

          Brown claims “from now on” – a complete lie

          The local authorities have to come up with the money and it is “a new rule”

          Oh shit another new rule – holy cow – this is worst than a car crash – this is suicide.

      • 91
        Phil O'Pastree says:

        Wincingly embarrassing. “L-l-l-l-let me finish…” said the rabbit blinking in the headlights.

        • 132
          jgm2 says:

          I think it’s some kind of NLP technique. It’s like when you phone (say) BA or BT or any fucker to make a complaint and they seem to be in a big rush to accuse you of shouting or ‘raising your voice’ or ‘using that tone’ or any fucking excuse they can think of to put you on the defensive. So they can then completely refuse to understand why you might be upset and get you off the phone as quickly as possible so they can get on with their job of not helping somebody else.,

          ‘If I could just finish…’ is another one of those. It’s designed to make you feel as though you’re being rude when he is the one peddling such an egregious load of bullshit it is astonishing Paxman doesn’t bust the chair into his smug, vacuous, arrogant, leering lying face.

          700 million quid to provide free care for all the UK’s elderly? Fucking hell. I think Scotland probably spends that on a population 1/10th the size of Englands. Just pure lies.

          ‘We will tax the rich to make up the deficit..’. A deficit of 200bn quid and the 50% tax is looking to raise 2bn quid max. Where’s the other 198bn quid going to come from?

          They are just pure evil.

          • Not to mention the disastrous effect the 50% tax will cause to the economy.

          • Esther Rancid says:

            Don’t be so rude and horrid to the young man. Once he’s had his cock cut and his bah mitvah he’ll be a nice young boy that any country would be proud to take home and make its next Prime Minister. You filthy mouthed schmucks ought to be ashamed!

          • Merv straight kinda guy King says:

            Where’s the other 198bn quid going to come from?

            - easy peasy, £200 billion freshly printed notes coming right up sir!

          • South of the M4 says:

            Did you not hear Ed. They will save the 198bn by not spending it on the ID cards. Creative accounting. I have, for example, just saved £200,000 by not buying that Bentley Continental GT I was thinking about. …….

          • blumpkin says:

            Brilliant!

            I’ve just saved millions by not buying a Lear Jet!

            Thank you so much – my debts will soon be gone

        • 148

          Better than that Phil the embarrassing. “L-l-l-l-let me finish…”
          Followed by Paxman saying “I’m waiting for you to finish” followed by…. “ohh,really..erm..ahhh….rm..well…ohhh…It started in America?”

        • 307
          Sir Samuel Gaschav says:

          I’ve never seen Ed Milliband give an interview before (I don’t have a TV), but after watching that cringe making performance I’m left with the thought; someone, somewhere, at some point in the past, thought hiring him would be a good idea.

          Did he bribe his way into the job? Was it nepotism? Did he suck cock?

          The other applicants must have been a freak show.

          • South of the M4 says:

            For a while I thought I was watching a re-run of a ‘not the 9 O’clock news’
            comedy sketch. Can a serious politician remain serious when he so evidently just picks figures out of the air? Oh, Gordon does that, and they call him serious……………

      • 113
        nell says:

        And Simpson of the Union says this is the man he wants for the next PM??!!

    • 104
      From Hero to Zero says:

      Why did Sarah Brown call Gordon a hero?

      Ask the Widows of those soldiers who have given their lives in Afghanistan fighting Gordon’s lost cause what a real Hero is Sarah.

      • 143
        One flew over the No 10 bunker says:

        *applause*

        • 172
          tat says:

          hear hear.
          and if sarah ‘turkey baster’ brown hasn’t figure out by now that her husband is an habitual liar then she must be a very dim person indeed.
          which she is not which in turn means she is as dishonest as her husband.
          innit.

          • The Ghost of Christmas Past says:

            Dim? No, dum.
            Dummer than manglebums dildo.

            I distinctly remember Brownstump saying he wasnt going to “use his family” to support him, yet there it is…again! Second time in as many years.
            Mrs Broon giving us a unique insight into Gordons positve attributes.
            I notice she didnt mention his small penis tho.

            He’s my hero….fuck me sarah, you dont aim too high do you?

          • SAS says:

            By the look of her frock, she had been paintballing before going into the conference hall.

      • 180
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        You are quite right that was a sickening moment for me. Sarah Brown proclaiming Gorgon as the hero is a complete insult to those brave dead soldiers. And why oh why has there been no representation at Wootton Bassett from government it is a disgrace. The sooner Brown the zero not hero is gone the better.

        • 456
          Mrs Broon (No Relation) says:

          Seems to me the man is hopefully suffering, he get greyer by the day. If it was my husband that I supposedly thought was a hero, I would be getting him out of politics before it or the population of this country kills him. Personally I don’t care which, oh and the fragrant Sarah needs a lot of worl to turn her out like that.

      • 183
        Vietghanistan says:

        good thing call me Dave has decided to pull the troops out then

        what’s that ? he hasn’t ? oh well better luck next time

        • 367
          Rt Hon. G Brown PM says:

          Whilst the death of every British soldier is of course regrettable, it is vital that our troops stay the course and continue to make the big supreme sacrifice, at the lowest possible financial cost, to protect a free and democratic Afghanistan and keep it safe from those fanatical elements who would, for instance, legalise the rape of women within marriage.

          So you see; I cannot allow that to happen and that is why I continue to make the big decisions to send our troops off to die.

          Tractor production up 15%.

          • G Brown's alter ego says:

            And that is why I withheld money while Chancellor from Tony’s wild military adventures. The idiot wanted to spend money on helicopters and body armour but I diverted it to private financiers who were building our new shiny hospitals!

      • 392
        artboyusa says:

        Hear, hear! Well said!

    • 226
      madness says:

      So Alastair Campbell says the Sun Switch won’t make much difference plus most Labour MPs and supporters are turning their noses up at the Sun’s readers.

      I reckon they are on very dodgy ground here, insulting the Sun’s readership, these are the people who vote at a general election, biting the hand that feeds you is madness.

      • 245
        jgm2 says:

        It’s a nasty habit they have. You see the Labour apologists denouncing anybody who dares question their fucked-up world-view as ‘Daily Mail’ readers as some kind of knee-jerk insult.

        Now they find themselves doing the same to Sun readers. The problem is that Sun readers are the ‘swing’ voters. The white van men. The ones who actually change their minds as opposed to the Mirror readers and Mail readers who are, shall we say, stuck in their ways.

        If these jackasses are insulting Sun readers then they are definitely suicidal – electorally speaking.

        • 271
          Anonymous says:

          Excellent point. I’ve just pulled into a lay-by off the A12 and there’s a white-van man reading the Sun.

          • Mandy says:

            Oooh, got your number Ducky! I always pull off in a lay-by. Anyway, Gordon- you know Gordon, big butch acting Gordon, married that very plain girl as cover- he’s going to win thanks to little old me! And when he’s PM again he’s going to make me into Queen Mandy the First!

          • Not a NuLabour Supporter, Honest says:

            Well, there’s your proof: The Sun is read by layabouts in lay byes. He was probably dogging or waiting for a prostitute to murder.

            And that’s why the Sun’s defection isn’t worrying The Great Leader at all. Not even a little bit. No, Never. Who? Us? Worried? Don’t make me laugh.

        • 377
          IF KINNOCK WINS TODAY WILL THE LAST PERSON TO LEAVE BRITAIN PLEASE TURN OUT THE LIGHTS says:

          They are already leaving comments about sun readers here. Yesterday Labour loved them, today they are just thickos who should not be allowed to vote. This is the arrogance that is Labour.

          http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23750607-gordon-brown-turns-on-media-in-tv-meltdown.do

      • 432
        Anonymous says:

        It’ll probably guarantee the collapse of the Tory vote in Liverpool.

    • 403
      Siberian Tory says:

      Hilarious!

      The Sun has bought Google ad words.

      Try typing Labour in to google and look at the advertisments on the left.

    • 462
      Anonymous says:

      The only thing that McBroon does not seem to done is to go to US and recieve his personal orders from Rupy as B’Liar did, do you remember those, maybe it was the McDoom curse Murdoch was afraid of.

  2. 2
    One flew over the No 10 Bunker says:

    “Gordon Brown has played down the damage to his electoral prospects after The Sun withdrew its support. The Prime Minister has insisted that voters, not newspapers, decide which party will be in Government, and urged people to take a close look at his policies”

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090930/tuk-brown-it-s-people-who-vote-not-paper-dba1618.html

    So why dont we get a vote on Liesbon then McDoom. Selective again you see and we have seen the policies and do not like what we see.
    BiBi Gordon and Nu Lav good riddance!! You are about to be wiped out

    • 23
      fuck the Euro says:

      don’t hear Cameron promising a vote on lisbon either
      just some wimpy waffle about not letting things stand

      • 160
        One flew over the No 10 bunker says:

        He stated clearly on a televised interview that “if Lisbon is not ratified we will be given a referendum”. If ratified it won’t stand there.

        I agree theres always a possibility they will do a Labour and ignore it but please get the quote correct and not just the part of it that supports your argument

        Before you ask, I dont have a link unfortunately and don’t have the time to look but I assure you I watched it myself when it was said.

        • 408
          Captain Haddock says:

          Yeah .. and I remember the last Tory Leader who promised us a referendum ..

          I’ve still to meet a single person who voted “Yes” to joining the then Common Market ..

          Cameron is a wet as a can of piss …

      • 162

        Cameron has promised a referendum on Lisbon if it’s not completely ratified when the Tories gain power.

        If it is already ratified, there is nothing that he or anyone else can do about it, referendum or no referendum.

        • 195

          Except vote out Cam and vote in say UKIP next time.

          • Ivor Schwartzporsche says:

            ACOne Ukip will likely be illegal if Lisbon comes in to force because one can’t speak ill of the european union under its conditions. Either Cameron promisses an In/Out referendum this time or he wont get votes.

        • 204
          brussels-louts says:

          if if if if if

          sounds like leadership and not the caveats and furious spinning of someone frightened of Ken Clarke and his Euro chums doesn’t it ?

          “there is nothing that he or anyone else can do about it”

          bullshit
          Britain is still a sovereign nation and can abrogate any treaty it pleases
          Dave just doesn’t have the balls
          he could call a referendum and use the mass public support against lisbon to abrogate or negotiate some sense into these corrupt euro fucks

          excuses
          some people will always be satisfied with excuses even when their corrupt leaders are giving Britain’s primacy and lawmaking powers away

        • 472
          Osama the Nazarene says:

          That’s true Expat. His only choice will then be to provide a referendum on leaving the EU and negotiating a bilateral agreement as with Switzerland or Norway as advocated by Dan Hannan and Doug Carswell.

          We’ll see how honest he is then???

      • 242
        Mr Ned says:

        Cameron has explicitly promised a referendum on Lisbon, he voted for that when labour voted against and the liberals abstained in the commons, and the tories voted in favour when labour and the liberals voted in the Lords against a referendum.

        IF the Irish vote no on Friday and the tories win the General Election, we will get a referendum.

        IF the Irish vote no, but the Czech President does not ratify the treaty until after the tories have won an election, then we will get a referendum.

        That referendum becomes moot IF the all the other nations ratify the treaty, why? Because labour have already ratified, gained royal assent and placed that ratification in Rome. This country has effectively ALREADY Ratified the treaty against the explicit promise in the labour 2005 manifesto:

        “The treaty strengthens the voice of national parliaments
        and governments in EU affairs. It is a good TREATYfor Britain
        and for the new Europe.We will put it to the British people in a referendum
        and campaign whole-heartedly for a ‘Yes’ vote to keep Britain
        a leading nation in Europe.”

        (how many times have labour lied that they only promised a referendum on a constitution, NOT a treaty?)

        IF all the other nations ratify the treaty Before the next UK general election then the treaty will already be law and part of that law is that individual nations will never again hold referenda on EU treaties.

        The UK will then be in no position to hold a referenda on the treaty. WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT? The treaty itself already would prevent the UK from having the power to reject the treaty. It also massively reduces our power to re-negotiate, or change or amend how the EU is governed.

        Wasting a few million pounds on a useless treaty that cannot in EU law make any difference would be utterly futile and a massive waste of money.

        I would dearly love to know what Cameron means by “not letting things stand” but by trying to re-open and re-negotiate Lisbon, they would be onto a guaranteed loser.

        IF lisbon is ratified into EU law by the time of the next election, the tories would have to be far more radical about the EU.

        They would have to go to the country promising to hold a referendum to withdraw from the EU, and then, finally, we would have a real choice at the next election.

    • 326
      South of the M4 says:

      ” People don’t kill politicians, newspapers do ”

      (credit to original song writer for those who remember).

  3. 3
    Chomping at the bit says:

    Brown admits on the Today programme that “We are insurgents not incumbents”

    Now that is a headline!!!

    • 5
      Vimeiro says:

      Yes and his tactics are like a ‘Suicide Economist’

    • 75
      Engineer says:

      Anybody else feel that Naughtie gave Brown the easiest of interviews? Being charitable, perhaps he felt it was bad form to kick a man when he’s down, but I can’t help feeling that if Naughtie had been interviewing John Major in 1996, things might have been a bit more heated.

      That said, Brown carried on digging his own hole. Asked about the televised debate with other party leaders “There’s a time for making decisions, and when the time is right….”

      • 82
        Chomping at the bit says:

        I felt that Naughtie was trying to get into asking the questions, but the trouble with Brown is that he steam rollers over the interviewer. This ‘chatty’ style only works if the interviewee is chatty back. Brown even bullies in the interview……… actually it is insulting to everyone.

        • 250
          Siberian Tory says:

          I’m sure he said “we” in reference to the Labour parties prospects as well.

          • blumpkin says:

            Yup, he most certainly did

            Interviewing Ed Balls on Toady in 2005.

            Here’s the audio file

            http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/observer/archives/JamesNaughtieWinningtheElec.mp3

          • Extinct Lemmings says:

            Naughtie’s got form for saying ‘we’ when talking about New Labour, he used the term during the 2005 G.E coverage – we’ve just got another one – he said in unconrollable excitement as the results came in. I heard it. A senior Tory noted it when J Humphries was under fire for being biased, for being too ‘harsh’ on some N.L. crap, nutty fruit cake inane stuff everyone is well familiar with.

            Thanks for that tip, think I’ll listen to it again.

      • 114
        Justice Fingers says:

        I was only half listening and thought he had said something quite barmy like that.

        Thank you Prime Minister, but I would like the person running the country to be decisive all the fucking time.

      • 130
        Infamy, yhev've all got it in for me says:

        Also said he wasn’t the sort to bring his family into the spotlight.
        So who was it that did the warm up act yesterday?

        • 164
          One flew over the No 10 bunker says:

          drag artist?

          • SarahN says:

            She is a bit “tranny” isn’t she? I know I said that about Yvette Cooper too, but Mrs. Balls is a wee Jimmy Krankie type – “Sarah” is pure truck-driver-with-electrolysis.

      • 194
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        Brown never answers a straight question it is so infuriating. In a televised debate he would be toast say what you like about Cameron and Clegg they would both slaughter McDoom. The way he stumble and mispronounces words leaves you thinking his more than a little disabled or perhaps on to high a dose of the pills.

    • 96
      English Liberation Front says:

      New Labour Old Spin. Some stupid boy pushing Mandy’s line that New Labour are the underdog as this will “appeal to voters”.

      New Labour are a dirty, empty shop in bankrupt Soviet Russia where the mad, jowly, thick set proprietor is desperately trying to arrange a few bogus items in the grimy window to entice people in, urged on by his gormless shop boys (political advisors) and shop staff (cabinet).

      “We’re all free Mr Brown. There are no customers.”

      • 276
        Mr Ned says:

        How can any party with a built-in majority of 44 seats be an underdog?

        If the tories and labour got exactly the same number of votes, labour would win an outright majority of 44 seats. The built-in majority in 2005 was 60 but boundary changes have reduced this. The built-in majority in 2001 was 66 I think, bet the boundary changes in Scotland reduced this.

        Labour are NOT the underdogs. the fact that they are so far behind even with a whapping big built in majority shows what a shit party they are.

        If labour do manage to scrape a majority, but get about a million LESS votes than the tories, then there will be blood in the streets.

        They will have NO democratic legitimacy whatsoever.

        • 348
          udderly 'orrible says:

          .. not to forget Liebour’s important new status as the “insurgents” rather than “incumbents” in Mcsickman’s own words to McNasty on Today.

        • 487
          Lee says:

          Can anyone explain to me how Labour can have a built in majority? I’ve heard before that the Conervative party need a higher % of votes in order to have a workable majority but am at a loss to understand how this is the case?

          (I’m serious here, I honeslty don’t get it)

      • 315
        Francis Futurama says:

        Labour equates to one of those ridiculous promotional display devices which were a theme of AreYou Being Served? Always being set up on the lingerie counter and watched by a distinctly unimpressed, if not disgusted, Mrs Slocombe, lights would flash hysterically and at increasingly frantic speed under lacy brassieres; lurid mechanical faces would form bizarre rictus smiles; knickers would twirl alarmingly fast and the whole thing would end with twangs and pops and fizzes and a puff of smoke. Then the mess would be swept away by the janitor.

    • 423
      Only slightly plumper than average says:

      He certainly wasn’t voted in …

  4. 4
    JS says:

    Looking forward to pictures of Brown in a lightbulb…

  5. 6

    The best aspect of the situation is that the more piling up of straws in the anti-Brown wind, the more he hunkers down. The more he does so, the more unseemly and damaging to his party his (increasingly likely to be forced) end will be.

  6. 8
    David Keen says:

    Time for someone to look a bit more deeply into Murdoch’s business interests, and what deals have been done behind the scenes with the Cameron team.

    • 21
      Anonymous says:

      Yawn….

      I tend to agree however I notice this point was not raised yesterday or after 1997 I wonder why not? Well yesterday they were not in support of the Tories I suppose but technically still ZanuLabour.

      Typical and Nu Labour Hypocricy personified.

      • 34
        David Keen says:

        I wasn’t planning to vote Labour anyway, but the Sun wouldn’t be doing this if there weren’t something in it for their owners, same as in 1997. It doesn’t really matter who’s making the point, if people are trying to influence votes through the press for competitive advantage, at least let’s know what’s at stake.

        • 56
          Phil O'Pastree says:

          The Sun do this because they have a history of backing the next winners. That is why this is so significant.

          Of course, Labour would never influence votes through the press for competitive advantage. If they did we could ask Campbell what his deals were.

          • Anonymous says:

            They backed Brown and thought he woudl win big.
            Didn’t you even read Guido’s piece ?

          • Archer Karcher says:

            “They backed Brown and thought he woudl win big.”

            If McBottler had gone to the country when he said he would, in september 07, he would have won.

            Luckily the serial coward lost his nerve at the last minute and we all know what has happened since.

      • 298
        Mr Ned says:

        “Typical and Nu Labour Hypocricy personified.”

        At least Cameron did not have to fly 12,000 miles around the world to meet Murdoch to beg for his support, like Blair did.

        That was unseemly, as all the labour faithful were still boycotting the Murdoch press, their devoted leader was giving Murdoch a rim-job in his private jet.

        Nu labour, nu depths of hypocrisy.

        • 339
          Anonymous says:

          Cams fucking spin doctor was the News of the World EDITOR
          do you need the dots joined up for you ? what a clown

    • 72
      Max says:

      Here are some financials; they have too much debt, TV is under pressure and MSM not for much longer on this earth. They know all this, they are clever boys. They could do with interest rates being low for as long as possible plus a kick in the arse for the BBC would be good, especially BBC online.

      Let’s see.

    • 202

      You don’t have to look far into the BBC’s “funding” (read extorting) interests to see why it actively propagandises for the Left.

      • 266
        Max says:

        Lots of things coming together which mean that BBC is toast anyway; you can watch TV off a dongle now for example. If one of those so-called TV detector vans hoved into view you could swallow the fooker and resume normal viewing later. The dismantling will be fun, some bits will sell on well (to cries from ZNL of “the tories are selling off the family silver” etc). Can’t wait. Any bets on who might buy up the online bits? As long as it’s not rigged and at full value I hope.

  7. 9
    TheCourtOfPublicOpinion says:

    Whoope-doo. The tories now get the retard vote.

    • 14
      Article 38 says:

      So you’re voting Conservative now?
      :-)

    • 18

      Retrieving it from Labour. Do you think we should have an IQ threshold for voting?

      • 57
        Boycott the ПРАВДА licence fee says:

        Not if the test is set by Labour.

      • 58
        Road_Hog says:

        Guido, do you think having a high IQ is relevant, McSnot is rumoured to have a high IQ.

        I rest my case.

        • 169
          jgm2 says:

          There is no fucking way Brown has a high IQ. Maybe he completed one of them five question things MENSA puts in the paper to try and lure in people and, with its generous ‘results’ to appeal to the vain it declared he had a high IQ.

          Maybe.

          Or possibly, as a kid, before he got kicked in the head he was indeed a child prodigy. But there is no way this fucker has got an IQ of 180.

          No fucking way.

          Every single IQ test I ever saw has some questions involving numbers. You’ve got to be able to multiply, add, subtract, divide. Know your fractions, know your primes.

          This fucker doesn’t know the first thing about numbers. Because if he did. If he understood anything_at_all about maths he would have a simple, basic understanding of economics. And he would know that he was creating a completely unsustainable economy floating on an ocean of borrowed money.

          If Brown has an IQ of 180 then I have an IQ of 190. And Maggies’ was 280.

          Brown? IQ of 180? Just another BIG LIE.

          The closest he’ll get to 180 is a deficit of 180 billion this year alone.

        • 217
          Brown's a Tosser says:

          The only way Gordon got to 180 was to have the answers beforehand. A little like his education policies where everything is dumbed down to fit his IQ. Its all very simples the man is a total waste of space and soon to be on the political scrapheap where he belongs.

          • jgm2 says:

            That’ll be it. He’ll have lied and cheated same way he lies and cheats about his ‘miracle economy’ when it was booming and how he lies and cheats and seeks to blame everybody else now it’s bust.

      • 62
        Phil O'Pastree says:

        There is an IQ test of sorts – getting the X in the right box is a challenge too great for some.

    • 19
      Spud_Gun says:

      A vote is a vote and once they’ve voted the culling can begin.

    • 46
      Anonymous says:

      who are these retards? the sun doesnt think its readers can make their own decisions? i didnt think anybody still read newspapers these days.

    • 151
      Max says:

      The Sun is not a bad read in parts, just about fills in the time whilst my bacon roll is being done. The political comment regularly makes sense. It’s all very well ZNL having a laugh now they are no longer “on side” but there is no disguising this hurts. And the tits are an irrelevant hangover from the 70′s, an affectation shared with, er, The Mirror. Who I believe are still with The Dear Leader.

    • 273
      Siberian Tory says:

      From what I’ve heard this is a bit of a climb down for Murdoch. Cameron’s team were on the record in 2007 as saying “we know Murdoch doesn’t like us and we don’t much care” presumably knowing Murdoch would find himself between the devil and the deep blue sea.

      I don’t doubt Dave is wetting himself with glee though.

  8. 10
    I have a long memory says:

    12 years of a mistaken policy by The Sun that has helped put this country well and truly in the Brown stuff.

    I knew then they had made a mistake backing the Blair grin. Now we all know!

    Cheers to The Sun but a bit late.

    • 41
      One flew over the No 10 bunker says:

      agreed I have to say I thought along the same lines. McGurner was on TVAM this morning stating its not papers but the ‘British people’ that decided elections.

      WTF? since when do that policy change happen?

      Remember that is from someone who bottled out of an election, was never properly installed as PM anyway and deviously re-named a treaty to sneak it pass the people while slithering through the back door at Liesbon to sign away a thousand years of rights. This without the promised referendum as previously promised in a manifesto.

      Cnut!! CNNNNNNNUUUUUUUUUTTTTTT!!!!

      • 179
        jgm2 says:

        It might not be the newspapers that decide elections but the BBC seems determined to prove that they can decide elections.

    • 312
      Mr Ned says:

      Agreed. I could never understand the editorial line constantly slagging off almost every policy (except war) that labour implemented and yet they still backed them. Made no sense whatsoever. They labelled Blair the most dangerous man in Britain and then told their readers to go vote for him anyway.

      Fucking nob-heads. The decision to ditch labour is the right decision, but only 12 years too late.

      The sun slags off labour and reports an extensive dossier of failure today. But the sun bears a large part of the blame too, for not holding labour accountable much much sooner.

  9. 16
    Road_Hog says:

    Talking of timing, when does the Irish referendum result get announced?

  10. 22
    righty right wing (mrs) says:

    McStalin on Pravda Toady this morning:

    “We (Labour) are the insurgents now”………

    …..does that mean we can expect IEDs around Tory Central office in the run up to the General Election?

    What a crass thing to say for a Prime Minister – particularly when British troops are in theatre fighting real “insurgents”.

    • 67
      Road_Hog says:

      Let’s recall the army from Iraq and let them deal with these terrorist insurgents that we now have in the UK. I’m sure they’d be up for the job, with or without Chinooks.

      • 318
        stilyagi_air_corps says:

        A bit of dirty CRW is exactly what the Labour Party deserves! Can I enrol as a ‘Son of Iraq’ over here?

      • 345
        Quantrill says:

        Yes, right now, and if ZNL won’t do it then the Army must act unilaterally and pull out. Preferably to surround Leeds and Bolton for a start. This would not be treason, the army swears to defend the Realm, that’s what used to be Great Britain by the way, not Afghanistan.

        The slaughter of our lads is criminal, the maiming is sickening, and slimy faced Brown gurgles about saving the World. New Labour hate the Army, the officers, the men. That is why there is no true sympathy and no government presence at Wooton Basset.

        I cant help feeling that ZNL get a warm glow everytime a True Brit comes home in a box or with his legs blown off.

        This has to stop NOW.

    • 107
      English Liberation Front says:

      Sickening in a really bad way to hear him say that. No British government has flexed its muscles and used its power as much externally and internally than New Labour.

      Insurgents my arse. Oppressors.

    • 146
      Rufus.T.Firefly. says:

      1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
      2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one’s own political party!.
      Funny use of “insurgent “wonder which version he prefers ,bit sick with our troops being killed fighting “insurgents”.

      • 448
        Australian says:

        Good one Rufus. It would be fun to have an interviewer ask McDoom into which definition he intended to fit himself and his fellow scum.

        If McDoom wants to stick witht hat description of himself, it seems to me that it is now the duty of every member of the armed services of this country to attempt to “neutralise” him.

    • 182
      TheCourtOfPublicOpinion says:

      No Gordon. Fighting insurgents needs real courage. Perhaps you should speak to whoever wrote this book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Courage-Eight-Portraits-Gordon-Brown/dp/0747565325

    • 219
      I;m not mad just Bad Gordon Brown lived here 2009-2015 Broadmoor Hospital G20 Ward says:

      The return of Damien Mc Bride and the dirty tricks department. Expect some bad news on Murdoch, Osborne and Cameron.

      Lets hope the Tory’s ban big Trade Unions, the massive pay those at the top get, the free houses, the travel.

    • 346
      Mr Ned says:

      Did he REALLY say that? If so that is fucking SICK!

      Not surprising though from a party that gave in to IRA terrorists and now have hosted McGuinness at a lavish party in the Brighton Hotel he arranged to be bombed!

  11. 25
    Article 38 says:

    It will also be interesting to see which way the Financial Times goes. Up to now they have been backing Brown but his u-turn on the City may put this in doubt too. Support from this quarter was indirectly responsible for building the trust of middle England in Labour’s financial ‘prudence’ (bad call btw).

    Brown will then have achieved the near-impossible and destroyed the coalition of interests that brought New Labour to power in the first place. Well done that man!

    • 44
      Boycott the ПРАВДА licence fee says:

      The FT’s gone political?? Fuck me. Can’t trust a word anyone says any more. There’s nowt left now among the broadsheets that isn’t partisan anymore, then. Thank fuck I gave up newspapers 4 years ago.

      • 218

        The FT is sometimes to the left of AlGrauniad!

        I’m surprised anyone with a Bloomberg feed ever bothers with it.

        • 450
          Australian says:

          I’m with you there, AC1. Gave up on the FT some years back now.

          If Britain “leading financial newspaper” couldn’t see years ago that McDoom was the greatest economic catastrophe ever to have been visited upon these shores, then there is no point in reading anything else that it spouts.

    • 356
      Mr Ned says:

      Yeah, but he has managed to really piss off their traditional core supporters in the process.

      I am sure that the big banking bosses will not give one shit that Brown slags the bankers off in front of the labour delegates, so long as he keeps sending them the tax-payers money to bail them out…

      Brown = Billions and Billions and Billions for billionaire bankers and bugger all but a bloody big tax bill for the rest of us!

  12. 28
    I have a long memory says:

    I forgot to say better late than never and whoope-doo too.
    Don’t forget even retards have a vote and they will be gratefully accepted.

  13. 30
    .243 Win says:

    Pravda spinning for all their worth this morning but the tone’s distinctly down as they try to prop up the regime.

    I don’t know if it was the endless repeat of the “it’s the voters who will decide, not the papers” rebuttal line, the careful framing of the “Securing Britain’s economic future” tag line in as many shots as possible or the interview with unreformed union luddite but there’s a palpable air of desperation in the ranks this morning. Most refreshing.

    Sign of the times : AlJaBeeba, scraping the barrel for a supportive headline come up with “Scottish Sun not backing Tories” on the website.

    • 36
      The Sun says:

      Glama modewl shows us her breasts! in colour!!!

    • 165
      Harriet Droney says:

      Rest assured that they will have the studio full of Zanu’s to interview during the Tory Conference, whereas there was no Tories during the Zanu Conf!!

      • 366
        Mr Ned says:

        Normally there is agreement between the parties that each get their “week in the headlines” without interruption.

        All parties and party leaders hold to this informal agreement. Except Brown, who uses the tory conference week to try to steal headlines. Remember how he went to Iraq to announce the end to the Iraq war? (when all he actually was announcing was a repeat of the existing Iraq policy)

        I am expecting a few labour dirty tricks next week. I hope that the media will deny them the oxygen of publicity.

  14. 31
    Gordon Derren Banks Brown says:

    I must that voters, not newspapers, decide which party will be in Government, and that is why we must keep doing the right thing for as long as possible and postpone the election indefinitely. The hardworking british people cannot be expected to take the time to read our blindingly correct manifesto and they will be dazzled instead by the titties in the sun. As we know looking at the sun can lead to temporary blindness. I have taken steps to remove the electoral cycle of tory boom and bust and the country can now go forward with a leadership message of continuity with change. Change you can always trust. When I lost my eye playing the mans game of rugby, I never thought that my disability would prevent me from being lifelong leader of the UK, but Harriet Harmen’s new disability equality act will prevent the optically disabled from being forced to resign their job – especially when that resignation is at the behest of a tabloid gutter press . ( cue applause).

  15. 32
    Cream Puff says:

    The Sun in Scotland hs the same headline but is not supporting the Tories, but will not support Labour or the SNP
    The Scottish ‘Editor’claims it was his choice, obvioulsy thankful that the dirty digger doesnt listen to BBC Radio Scotland

  16. 33
    Grumpy Old Man says:

    The “Tits and Bums” may have deserted Labour, but Moredoughs’ broadsheets are still hiding their intentions. King Rupert wouldn’t be playing both ends against the middle now, would he?

    • 201
      Anonymous says:

      Polly and the Grauniad have gone too, don’t forget.

    • 275
      G B says:

      Isn’t the sun a bit homophobic in this day n age? I’m not complaining just asking as its rightfully PC to be concerned about unfairness

      • 372
        Mr Ned says:

        nope, I do believe that the sun loves lesbians and has had features about which hollywood totties are bisexual.

  17. 38
    Boycott the ПРАВДА licence fee says:

    What a fickle chap old Murdoch is. I’ll wager the atmosphere in Brighton has returned to the funerial today!

  18. 39
    "Britain's hardworking families" says:

    Go Rupert! attack Brown and is Marxist idiot chums by simply telling the truth – Even the tribal labourites of the north, Wales and Scotland might get the message.

    If they can’t be persuaded to vote Conservative at least help stop ‘em voting Labour on the day!!!

  19. 40
    Michael says:

    The unreadable in pursuit if the unelectable.

  20. 42
    Cream Puff says:

    Talking of papers what support parties. Also on Good Morning Scotland the Daily Record (aka Daily Retard) confirmed that it will be continueing to support Labour as it always has. Which is proabably why its in decline in Scotland due to a readership thats increasingly against its readership, who are increasingly fed up with the same old tat from the Retard

  21. 43
    McPillGobbler says:

    Gordon Brown for page 3!
    Or his missus!
    Sarah is now fair game for a rooting, now she has stepped
    into the fray twice, and incessantly Twitters!
    They make a lovely coupling!

    • 178
      Anonymous says:

      Much as i loathe Brown and Labour i think you are out of order. Leave it be and focus on him and the party.

      • 284
        Anonymous says:

        Has anyone seen Anne Main MP and Sarah in the same room?

      • 340
        Fed up to the back teeth says:

        Bairs wife never spoke at labour the labour conferance and she was fair game

        • 384
          Mr Ned says:

          agreed, IF Mrs Brown (who only married for convenience) kept out of politics, then she would be wholely out of bounds. But she put herself in the media spotlight and by so-doing has invited the firing squad herself.

          She may genuinely see Gordon as her hero, but that only shows what a terrible judge of character she is and how gullible, naive and stupid she is.

          As I understand it, a hero’s primary characteristic must be one of courage. Courage is a quality that is entirely lacking in Gordon Brown.

          I wonder if she will dump him as fast as the rest of the country when he is not in power anymore.

          • Captain Haddock says:

            Totally agree ..

            She can’t expect to step into the political “arena” and when whinge to the “Lions” that she’s only there as a spectator … and neither can anyone else .. She’s “fair” game now ..

            Though in fairness, if she & McSnot do stay together forever, she’ll be doing womankind in general a huge favour .. in as much as saving some other poor bitch being lumbered with the twat ..

          • Australian says:

            Captain – I don’t think any other WOMEN have to worry about Brown targeting them with his “affections”!

          • Cicero says:

            There was a comment on the Graun the other day (which lasted about five minutes before being removed) to the effect that there was a thing called the Black Widow Fund, out of which, it is said, Sarah Brown was paid £140,000 to marry Brown, and an additional £50,000 for each year she remains married.
            The fund was allegedly set up to ensure that Labour politicians of an *ahem* different persuasion could ‘encourage’ someone to marry them when the time came.
            The comment said it was set up from money raised by Maxwell, stolen from his pensioners.
            If you google it, the same comment appears still to be on the end of one of the Independent’s articles on Mrs B.
            Hmmmm… interesting …

  22. 45
    I hate the biased BBC says:

    So when will the BBC stop backing Labour ?

    • 53
      death of a thousand cuts says:

      Well the Labour party seems to have stopped backing Labour so I guess it will only be a matter of time

    • 55
      .243 Win says:

      Directly after they stop being publicly funded.

      They’re as close to a permanent ZaNu fifth column as you could get.

    • 77
      Labour's Dead says:

      They already have judging by the way that Sian Williams ripped him to shreds in her interview with the lying twat this morning.

      Very enjoyable BBC keep up the Brown-Baiting.

    • 119
      English Liberation Front says:

      They won’t. The BBC represent the real core of Marxist ideology in Britain. For them the most important thing is to stop the Tories. It won’t matter how bad the New Labour government is.

      My alarm clock is the BBC radio coming on with the news and almost every morning I can guarantee that the first two words I hear will be “Gordon Brown . . .”. I have never known a soviet-style “Great Leader” personality cult like it.

      • 231
        George says:

        I agree absolutely – just remember what you’ve just said and when the BBC is culled – remember how it used to be – surely something to look forward to

        • 453
          Australian says:

          Well said ELF. I now just have a good old fashioned bell-ringing alarm clock. Being shattered out of sleep by a loud bell is far preferable to the risk of hearing McDoom’s name when I wake up in the morning!

      • 237
        mad fred 2 para says:

        Obama?

      • 389
        Mr Ned says:

        I wonder if the Common Purpose graduates in the tory party have been having words with their Common Purpose brethren in the BBC? They do not care which party is in power, so long as they continue to implement the agenda.

  23. 48

    Simply it means that prospective parliamentary candidates standing in any labour seat can kiss goodbye to their deposits and many sitting MP’s will now throw in the towel and take the resettlement funds offered to them on ‘retirement’ . The tories will now have to stop messing around and properly engage in debate and release plans, numbers to be credible…

  24. 49
    Etcetera says:

    It’s the SUN wot done it! Gord Bless it!

    Now let’s hope they hold Commie Ron (or sib Son me Ron?)
    by the throat and make him declare a referendum on LISBON and
    expose the cost benefit ratio of our membership of the Evil Union -
    THAT will save billions.

    Gordon on the Toady Programme this morning was obviously rooting
    for World Government. He is one stupid sick dog – how can Sarah say
    such things about such a piece of pond slime? Or does she throw the remote
    back at him?

    How much did he have to pay her for saying all that nice stuff about him?

  25. 50
    Right Bastard says:

    McSnot has put himself in the role of urban terrorist. Not surprising really after he and his henchmen feted the IRA killer, Martin McGuiness, at the Grand Hotel in Brighton yesterday.

    • 60
      .243 Win says:

      Yeah, but at least he’d be one of the incompetent twats who blew himself up with his own bomb.

    • 64
      mad fred 2 para says:

      Did they?

      How many British soldiers wounded in action in Labours wars for the hearts & minds of 7th century intellectuals did they invite to Brighton?

      • 80
        .243 Win says:

        Worse than that Fred, try finding out if the gurning one has actually visited any of the servicemen or women who’ve paid the price for ZaNu’s “policy” anywhere, anytime.

        • 142
          Great Granddad says:

          Not only did he put himself in the role of urban terrorist, but he re-affirmed his world following, almost in the same breath. Bliar for President of Europe and McGordo for leader of the world. No wonder Sarah adores him.

        • 248
          mad fred 2 para says:

          Ah yes, the New Labour “Ethical Foreign Policy” –

          ………..is it nigh on 2 million dead in Labours escapades abroad now?

          Ethical Foreign Policy – looks so malevolent and Orwellian with hindsight doesn’t it?

          • Mr Ned says:

            I thought it looked like a malevolent and Orwellian con trick in foresight, hence why I can proudly boast that I have never ever voted for the bastards.

            I was never taken in by Blair’s fake sincerity and if I had any say, I would sack every media pundit that was. They are clearly sorely lacking in judgement and are far too gullible to write for the masses.

      • 270
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        Brown has saved 15 million jobs!!! WTF did that statistic come from can anyone elaborate cos I am mystified by that statement.

        • 363
          Great Granddad says:

          Well, there’s all those CCTV cameras. Takes a lot of manpower to review all of that footage. Hard work but someone’s got to do it.

        • 369
          South of the M4 says:

          Didn’t *uckin save mine. Nulabours ever-increasing red tape and costs made the UK an uncompetitive place for my business. Thanks Gordon. Twat.

        • 393
          Filbert E. Gibbet says:

          I think he’s saved them from being given to anybody

          • Mr Ned says:

            ROFLMAO!!!! Soo sorry, but that is brilliant dark humour.

          • Truth Sayer says:

            15 million public slaves, I mean *servants* jobs no doubt.

            He certainely didn’t go out of his way to help the private sector. Just hammered it with more red tape and taxes.

  26. 51
    death of a thousand cuts says:

    This is what we have been waiting for; a slow and lingering death for the Labour party and a slow and emotionally painful death for Brown.

    No longer do we have to listen to Brown, now for a change he must listen to us.

    Good on the Sun for rubbing salt into the wounds, the more pain the better, but it was all over for them anyway.

    Cameron may turn out to be a useless pile of shit but at least he is a different pile of shit

    • 282
      Brown's a Tosser says:

      I am most definately not your typical tory voter, but I have to say for the most part I beleive what I hear coming from Cameron’s mouth, whereas I cannot believe a word Brown says.

      • 402
        Mr Ned says:

        more fool you. I cannot believe a word either of them say. Unless Cameron shows by his actions that he will stand up for the people of THIS country, that he will defend this SOVEREIGN Isle from being taken to bits by the EU, that he will completely dismantle the police survielance state and scrap the intrusive “Big Brother” databases, and that he will try to balance the budget and make the tax and benefits system much much simpler and fairer and start getting value for money, efficiency and effectiveness back at the core of the public sector, and unless he demonstrated through his actions a commitment to reducing the size and burden of the state, then he will not get my vote.

        It looks like he does not need my vote yet anyway, so although I am not a supporter of any of the three so-called mainstream parties, I shall reserve jugdement and see if he can prove me wrong.

        I did likewise in 1997. The labour party failed to prove me wrong for 12 years. I do not expect any different from Cameron, but I would LOVE for him to actually prove me wrong.

        • 420
          Captain Haddock says:

          Well said indeed Ned .. I’m with you all the way ..

          Let the bastards EARN the right to my vote by proving to me that they mean what they say .. and that they can actually do what they claim they can do ..

  27. 54
    McGroom says:

    We all said in July that attacking Coulson, The News of the World and therefore Murdoch was political folly.

    Now it has come home to roost.

    The election is Cameron’s to lose, lets hope he doesn’t come across as to smug. I hope he doesn’t start using the Mandelson tactic of personal slur and smear, everyone knows Gordon is a moron, we don’t need Cameron trying to reinforce a point everyonme grasps.

    Conservatives should differentiate themselves by telling us what they are going to do, not by concentrating on what a discredited bunch on no hoper failures would do.

    Let Labour destroy itself – Cameron does not need to get sullied in the mire.

    • 92
      Obama is a twat says:

      Spot on the BBC tried to take the heat off corrupt Liebour MPs by bigging up a total non story about Andy Coulson made up by the Grauniad, I don’t think Coulson has forgotten that and I can’t wait for Norman Tebbit to kill the BBC.

    • 109
      A Pensioner says:

      Agree. CmD’s best tactic would be completely to ignore him and Zanu like they no longer exist. Everyone knows the crime sheet and that they are guilty as charged. Time to consign then to oblivion.

      • 292
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        At the LibDems conference last week there was next to no mention of NuLabour it was full on attack of the Tories. So it is pretty much what is happening. I think the tories next week will have to attack some of the policies and u-turns announce yesterday its to good to miss.

      • 413
        Mr Ned says:

        Agreed, he should rise above. Perhaps the tories should prepare a long list of labour failures and publish that online and only refer to it in passing in Cameron’s speech next week.

        Something like, We all know that 12 years of labour misrule has been a disaster. We all know what they have failed in and I could spend an age reading out a long long list, but I won’t because it would take too long, it woulld be negative and it would turn many voters off. If anyone wants to read such a list it is on the website, instead I shall focus on the future because that is what the nation really wants to us to focus on. Sure some people will get a kick out of me attacking Brown, but it is far more important for me to focus on how we can rescue this wreck, this disaster, this scorched earth and create and build a Britain to be proud of once more.

        and then not mention labour at all after that.

  28. 61
    Stealing BNP policies for Slags says:

    How much would the BBC be worth in an IPO?
    The timing feels exactly right.

  29. 65
    Fred Goodwin's Duck Palace says:

    So much for the Dead Tree Press

    Their influence has shrunk just a touch since 1997

    Timing is indeed everything

    So you would have thought an internet evangelist like Guido would have spotted the amusing juxtaposition of the Sun story with this story that is in it’s own way equally important and puts this one in it’s proper perspective

    INTERNET OVERTAKES TELEVISION TO BECOME BIGGEST ADVERTISING SECTOR IN THE UK

    The UK has become the first major economy where advertisers spend more on internet advertising than on television advertising, with a record £1.75bn online spend in the first six months of the year.

    The milestone marks a watershed for the embattled TV industry, the leading ad medium in the UK for almost half a century. It has taken the internet little more than a decade to become the biggest advertising sector in the UK.

    UK advertisers spent £1.75bn on internet advertising in the six months to the end of June, a 4.6% year-on-year increase, according to a report by the Internet Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers. To put this in perspective, in 1998, when the IAB first measured internet advertising, just £19.4m was spent online.

    The internet now accounts for 23.5% of all advertising money spent in the UK, while TV ad spend accounts for 21.9% of marketing budgets.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/sep/30/internet-biggest-uk-advertising-sector

    You’ll notice the dead tree press is barely mentioned so little is though of that mediums power these days

    • 105
      Phil O'Pastree says:

      Every newspaper also has a website.

      • 140
        Fred Goodwin's Duck Palace says:

        And Murdoch’s stupid enough to think he can start charging for that
        Think the Admen and their revenue will flock to his papers sites once there is a paywall ? He’ll be lucky to give ad space away

      • 301
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        And TV stations, don’t forget about Fox.

  30. 66
    Sir William Waad says:

    Sun ‘readers’ don’t care who runs the country, as long as she has large breasts.

    The Times has also become relentlessly anti-Brown, if not exactly anti-Labour. Is it OK for them to be right for the wrong reasons?

  31. 68
    bergen says:

    Murdoch cannot afford to back the loser.If Cameron won without his assistance,he could in theory have a proper investigation into his companies by the competition authorities .Not likely,but why should Murdoch risk it?

  32. 70
    Labour's Dead says:

    BBC SAVAGES BROWN IN THIS MORNINGS INTERVIEW

    Did you see it ??

    At 7:45am Sian Williams this morning tore shreds out of the Prime Mentalist. He is such a wounded animal now that even the tamest of interviewers made him look like the lying deceivig bong-eyed koont that he is.

    LET THE PHOOKER DIE SLOWLY !

    • 78
      Phil O'Pastree says:

      Brown could do one popular thing before he goes. Stand on the empty plinth in Trafalgar Square for just one hour.

      The fruit sellers would make a mint.

    • 122
      Bankrupt Britain says:

      I saw the speech when I got back last night and struggled to keep my chicken curry down. I turned on the TV this morning to see the ugly twat’s gurning face again.

      When you are mauled by Sian Williams (hardly Jeremy Paxman) I think the game really is up. He was also given a good drubbing by Adam Boulton on Sky, I think he was sitting in the same chair even. All these reporters must be queueing up to lay into him.

    • 198
      Minekiller says:

      Sian is clearly positioning herself for the post-General Election Apocalypse when the BBC is broken up and she’ll need a job at the UK equivalent of Fox….

    • 338
      3 cheers for Sian Williams! says:

      Sian is superb and the ONLY TV reporter who has her facts ready to demolish this sack of lying crap Brown.

      She is miles ahead of any others and being a woman,she will keep on and on at Brown – I am male by the way,but I have little respect for the somewhat lazy attitudes of Boulton etc.

      Sian – take them down!

    • 492
      Axe The Telly Tax says:

      I prefer to read the headline TEBBIT SAVAGES BBC ;-)

  33. 71
    going mental says:

    who reads that trash anyway ?

    • 74
      Phil O'Pastree says:

      Voters mostly. And it is the most popular paper in the UK.

    • 84
      Obama is a twat says:

      Who reads the Guardian and Independent then? Apart from gay beeboids and badly abused 14 year old rent boys no one I suggest.

  34. 73
    Stronghold Barricades says:

    So Harperson can stand up this afternoon and declare

    Go to your constituencies and prepare for Oblivion

    If Brown holds the council and general elections at the same time it could deliver a double whammy for him

    How many Labour members does it take to prop up their organisation?

    • 267
      THE SUN says:

      Or Go To Your Constituencies And Prepare For Unemployment !

      • 307
        Brown's a Tosser says:

        Do MP’s get P45′s?

      • 401
        Filbert E. Gibbet says:

        How about.

        Go back to your constituencies and prepare for years of unpaid ‘work experience’ like current new graduates do.

        All this posturing about the minimum wage and they have created a country in which many employers have ‘work experience’ people doing regular jobs that used to be paid. The media are the absolute worst when it comes to such exploitation just as they are the worst for nepotism.

    • 353
      VERY IMPORTANT POINT RE BROWN says:

      Brown says he is touring the country to take his message out to “the people”

      Right,this is where he arrives at Ball’s etc consituency in a hall guarded by police and sits with Labour activists only and they swop kisses.

      Notice that Brown has NEVER been on the electoral tour – remember Major with his soapbox – I CANNOT believe Brown will even go out to any area where the public are – he will be lynched and the press will there to watch him being lynched

  35. 76
    A firm pair of breasts says:

    PHWOAA!!! Look at the tits on that front brench!

  36. 81
    Obama is a twat says:

    The Sun might have deserted McGay but the BBC hasn’t. Check out Nicki Campbell’s phone in with another list of left wing guests (no anti Brown callers or guest allowed) we have Neil Kinnock and Tony Benn’s bitch daughter.

    Funny that I left the BBC two text messages on two different phones (anti Brown) neither read out nor a call to ask me to go on air, but I’m betting the BBC will read out plenty of pro Brown texts.

    But next week at the Tory party conference there will be plenty of left wing guests on to attack the Tories and I bet if I sent in an anti Cameron text it would get read out.

    • 88
      Rip Van Winkle says:

      It’s a fricking joke. isn’t it? It’s like a Labour Love Fest. Any anti callers not reqquired.

    • 98
      going mental says:

      The bbc needs to be privateised i chose to pay for sky why should i be forced to pay for the labour love-in channel?

      • 137
        Obama is a twat says:

        Because it keeps 25,000 left wing losers in jobs. Do you have any idea what would happen to the Cocaine industry in Islington if the BBC were scrapped?

      • 490
        Extinct Lemmings says:

        There is also the £3.5 Billion, privatised ?

        PROSECUTED FOR OBTAINING BY DECEPTION.

    • 133
      Bankrupt Britain says:

      Is Benn’s daughter as much of a hypocritical shit as he is? I didn’t hear the interview.

    • 197
      Groucho says:

      I caught the end of both Sky News and BBC News last night – the bit where they read out the next day’s newspaper headlines.

      The Sky woman just read them out. The BBC newsreader couldn’t help himself “well thats the Sun headline, others are less biased”. I don’t recall the smug arsewipe making any such comments when the tables were turned.

    • 260
      BBC-ULL says:

      The BBC will be culled under the Tories

      They will be warned!

      They will be targeted & monitored

      They will be culled

    • 426
      Captain Haddock says:

      What else can one expect from a grown man who still calls himself “Nicky” ? .. FFS …

  37. 85
    Max says:

    Quote of the day must be from The Daily Mash:

    “Brown makes the speech of Cameron’s life”

  38. 95
    Anonymous says:

    i think the Sun could have done this 24hours earlier for max effect

  39. 100
    We Can Win Without The Sun says:

    So says the Guardians new online headline.

    Try getting a tan but great for Global Warming

  40. 102
    Moley says:

    Very few newspapers are influential because most of them have an established political line and an established readership.
    The Guardian will never change a reader’s mind because their readers are already staunch socialists.
    Mirror like wise; only Labour supporters buy it and McGuire’s rantings won’t change anything.

    The Sun is slightly different; it does change its views; its voters are floating and can be influenced.

    The thing to watch is the circulation figures for the Mirror and the Sun.
    If the traditional Labour supporter is truly fed up, he,(or she) will ditch the Mirror and buy the Sun.

    • 157
      Engineer says:

      Good point.

      With that in mind, the Sun’s change in political nuance is more a matter of pragmatically following the opinion polls, which have been consistently and for quite a time rather poor for Labour.

      The Sun’s reputation for backing winners is perhaps as much about following the herd (they pay for newspapers, after all) as about trend-setting. That said, the tone of the Sun’s political comment will undoubtedly influence some of the less free-thinking voters.

      • 287

        Indeed – and to add that Murdock and friends want to be on side with the incoming government, rather than the exprired one we currently have to put up with.

  41. 110

    Dearie dearier me: The Love Labour’s Lost. Dumped by the soaraway Sun, with a particulary nasty “Dear John” letter on the front page.

    Had to laugh at the stupidity of @kerrymp, who thinks the loss of the Sun doesn’t matter to Labour because “We’ve got Twitter”

    Ahahahahahahahahahaha!

  42. 111
    formerly Tory Troll at Labout list says:

    Whats up with everyone?

    The big story is *BROWN PROMISES A CURE FOR CANCER*.

    Didn’t anyone else hear that in his speech? He said it again and again, we are going to beat cancer… he said so!

    Or was is so completely mad, stupid and delusional that no one could believe their ears so they instantly forgot?

    The big story is *BROWN PROMISES A CURE FOR CANCER*.

    • 117
      .243 Win says:

      Yep, heard that one too. A cure for cancer “within a generation”.

      The flying saucer people told him…..

    • 118
      Chomping at the bit says:

      I heard it… I didn’t believe it.. my wife works in the cancer field and she went “What…….??? Dim bastard”

      • 210
        TOUGH ON SCUM TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF SCUM says:

        Slightly O/T My Nextdoor Neighbor Two Years Of Tests To Find Out He Had Prostate cancer! After His Chemo Told He Would “Have A Long Productive Life !” Died In Less Than Two Months Buried Him On Monday !

    • 131
      nell says:

      Except we have the worst cancer care/treament record in the whole of western europe And it sure aint going to change under labour. Just more lies, more spin and lies it’s what they do.

      • 227
        Alan Philip Bongg says:

        Yep, least access to cancer treatment in the world. I thought “you can start by funding cancer drugs on the NHS you tight bastard”!

        • 466
          Anthony Wilson says:

          They do fund all sorts of cancer treatments, many of the very expensive.

          I hope you aren’t on about the drugs that don’t really work.

          • Alan Philip Bonggg says:

            No. I’m talking about the newer biologicals (monoclonal antibodies) such as Avastin in metastatic colorectal cancer and all the ones turned down by NICE in renal cancers etc, which are very effective on criteria such as progression free survival. Also, in the UK, because of the measure of cost per quality adjusted life year being applied, any drug that obtains a licence for one of the many rare cancers (collectively not very rare) is unlikely to get funding. An independent study from Scandanavia recently showed that Britain is bottom of the league in Europe (perhaps not the world) with regard to access to cancer treatments.

          • Anthony Wilson says:

            Still fairly experimental, and not particularly impressive. Some of them wouldn’t be paid for by any sort of insurance scheme.

            Are you saying that there should be no NICE and the taxpayer should hand over a blank check? The reality of the situation is a bit shit, and money can’t save you from renal cancer.

    • 135
      Groucho says:

      Look, he saved the world and he is World Statesman of the Year.
      He is probably stronger than a locomotive and can clear tall buildings in a single bound.

      Curing cancer will be a piece of piss.

      • 144
        Minekiller says:

        No, he is according the “Equalities Minister” World Statesperson of the Year

        • 291

          Stupid bint. Sums everything that is bad about the Party and the Government.

          She’ll be saying next that Liebour are having next year’s conference in Personchester…

      • 193
        TOUGH ON SCUM TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF SCUM says:

        He’s Cured The Problem Of A fully Elected House Of Lords ! Fill It with Unelected Ones ! Sorted !

      • 336
        Brown wasted £20bn of 3g Liscences says:

        He will cure all known Diseases in the World by the GE!
        Seemples

    • 158
      Groucho says:

      Today he will be curing world hunger and building a perpetual motion machine.

    • 188
      Minekiller says:

      Didn’t the Alien Lizards on that cheesy 70s TV series ‘V’ promise to cure cancer? Or was that the Cylons on Battlestar Galactica? Now we know what he needs his Sky subscription for – it is where he gets his policy ideas -The Sci-Fi Channel.

    • 189
      TOUGH ON SCUM TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF SCUM says:

      How Many years Have they Been Funded to Find a Cure ? They Never will The Big Money Is In “control” Same with Aid’s No Money In Cure Or Eradication !

      • 303

        Daft twat.

        Cancer is often cured, but cancer is a hard problem. That’s the reason 100% of people are not cured.

        My friends child luckily got cured of Leukaemia recently (with the standard of NHS care varying enormously).

        However Big Money has nothing to do with it. A bigger factor is probably how socially negative scientists are perceived, this probably deters lots of capable people from becoming researchers.

    • 404
      Infanta of Castile says:

      I don’t think this is the first time – I’m sure he has announced in the past that he has cured cancer.

  43. 115
    Gordon Straining Forward:'Just Another Inch...'.Mouth-Gape says:

    Guido: I suppose you DO KNOW that Brown is the only politician able to ‘magic’ Baps into Currant Buns?

  44. 121
    ron Vibentrop says:

    The plotters, the party, the schemers have all failed to oust the largest turd on the pavement. Finally it is coming down to US, THE VOTERS, to tell this one eyed junkie that we loathe him.

    The Tories won’t win the election with lightweights like Giddy Osborne and Cameroon, Brown will loose it.

    • 332
      JMT says:

      I agree with you there, but then parties never win elections – the other bozos always lose it.

      8 years time we will be going through the same saga, albeit the candidates being EU politburo approved – just like communist Russia.

  45. 123
    Groucho says:

    OT but on the coverage of Brown’s speech on the news last night, I spotted an old work colleague of mine sitting on the front row, applauding enthusiastically.

    Turns out he’s a would-be Labour candidate.

    He always was a bit of a weirdo, to be honest.

    • 155
      Bankrupt Britain says:

      I knew a girl at university whom I saw on the stage during McDooms stentorian conveyor belt of mindless platitudes. Turns out she’s going to be candidate for Wolverhampton East. What a stupid bint.

    • 280
      Bennett says:

      Was he the whosit with a whatsit hanging from his thingymajig ?

      as they used to say in Fife

  46. 124
    Inspector Cyril Blake says:

    I disagree; Sun readers do NOT need to be told what to think, it’s just that only three of them can actually read :)

  47. 125

    Ah, what a happy day. I reckon we may yet see some cabinet resignations – maybe even this week. Broon is held in utter contempt by everyone with half a brain. His wretched, dishonest, destructive reign is nearing its end.

    This feels like Narnia, with the snow beginning to melt.

    You are fucked “comrades”, you absurd posturing prats. Fucked.

    • 139
      nell says:

      Resignations? Baroness Scotland perhaps?

      • 163
        Groucho says:

        That shameless mare? Some hope.

      • 335
        Doris says:

        What’s happened to the ridiculous & useless Baroness?? Why has the daily mail stopped covering this story? Has she issued writs to all the msp? Strange that the story has been cut dead in mid flow. So much for democracy!

        • 354
          Groucho says:

          It was knocked off the front pages by the Brown pill popping story and has stayed off due to the party conference coverage.
          The Baroness just needs to keep a low profile for a few more days and she will have got away with it.

      • 428
        Baron Scotland says:

        Leave off. I need the silly moo out working.

    • 290
      Reflex says:

      I hope you enjoyed saying that as much as enjoyed reading it!

      Thanks

  48. 129
    Anonymous says:

    Great article by Peter Oborne in the Daily Mail today attacking Gordon Brown as a liar and a coward and for bringing Britain to the brink of bankruptcy:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1217052/PETER-OBORNE-He-chose-save-skin–rescue-Britain.html

  49. 136
    Minekiller says:

    Pleased as I am that the Stun has seen some sense at last, it makes one weep to think that a mainstream political party requires the support of this RedTop’s readership to make it into office. One must conclude that the right to vote may have been extended too far among the populace of this once proud and mighty nation.

  50. 145
    Obama is a twat says:

    I find it highly amusing that Queen Nicki Campbell seems to think that Neil Kinnock is some intellectual giant who is a political expert. This is the man who lost an election to John Major when all the polls said he’d win.

    Not only that but like all failed corrupt Socialists he pisses off to the EU gravy train.

    Jesus now we have even more Liebour politicians on.

    • 150
      Anonymous says:

      It’s supposed to be a phone-in about Brown but it’s just the Kinnochio show so far.

      • 167
        Groucho says:

        Once the Welsh Windbag gets into his stride, nobody else will get a word in.

        • 215
          jgm2 says:

          Kinnock has no clue how much he is loathed by the voting public does he? This is a guy who contrived to lose an election to John Major. And then fresh from that brilliant act of leadership headed off to Brusselsalong with his equally talentless missus to engorge their sense of entitlement and to sell us further down the river, meanwhile enriching themselves beyond the wildest dreams of most voters.

          Oh, and setting their kids up on the wagon as well.

          If Nicki Campbell is a Labour shill then he needs to understand that every second that arrogant sack of shit Kinnock is regaling listeners with his faux sonerous, words-of-wisdom, boyo schlik another thousand voters are giving it ‘I’ll wipe the smug leer off that arrogant fuckers fizog’.

    • 187
      Geordie Boy says:

      Nobody listens to Kinnock. The blathering welsh hypocrite and his reptilian wife have spent the last ten years ripping off the taxpayer for as much as they can and stuffing the loot down a disused coal mine. It’s now three quarters full and they’re hoping to fill it all the way during the next 8 months. Their verminous offspring will then be set up for the next 5 generations.

      • 203
        Groucho says:

        I read somewhere recently that the Kinnock clan has managed to skim off about 10 million quid over the years from the UK and EU.

      • 459
        Australian says:

        They have no need to hurry to fill up the rest of the coal mine, Geordie Boy. Don’t forget that in yet another McDoom master stroke, Mrs Kinnochio is now able to “Lord” it over us (at our expense) for the rest of her misbegotten life from the House of Lords.

        Along with scumbags Martin, Sugar, Mandlescum and all the rest of the rotten crew.

    • 240
      techno says:

      “Not only that but like all failed corrupt Socialists he pisses off to the EU gravy train.”

      That’s what the EU was created for.

  51. 147
    ex-labour says:

    Is anyone else sick to death of hearing about and seeing Sarah Brown? She is a professional public relations con-artist who is trying to kid us into thinking she is just a genuine little wifey. She is Brown’s last desperate throw of the dice.

    Paul Dacre may have been fooled by her but I doubt many other people have.

    • 473
      Grandma B says:

      Sarah’s introduction was so cringeworthy, I had to turn the volume off. Surely for any PR person this was an embarrassing mistake. Last year’s introduction was sort of OK, but this second one was dreadful.

  52. 154
    TOUGH ON SCUM TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF SCUM says:

    Brown’s Back Stabbing Scum Cabinet Will Be Sharpening Their Knives Again But Has Anyone Of Them Got The “Balls” To Challange Him ? I Think Not ! They Will Just Go With Him To The GE “Like Lambs To The Slaughter ! Bye! Bye ! Brown !

  53. 168
    Lil' ol' Missy Shitty, da Green Shoot Twitty, she says:



    Da Glor’us Leeda ! He sho’ am da Main Man !

  54. 171

    One day….many moons from now I will sit down with my grandchildren by the fire and tell them the stories of a political party called “The Labour Party”….they will turn to me and say “Grandad that’s a funny name for a political party….are you making this up grandad?”……..Labour must fall like an Icelandic bank and be broken up for good……..after that the Tory party and Lib Dems should be for the chop…..Long live the Libertarians……

  55. 176
    I'VE JUST WHIPED MY ARSE WITH THE SUN says:

    Murdoch will be dead soon, hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray, hip hip hooray!

  56. 190
    Max says:

    Anyone else notice that McDoom, as reported by the BBC, is “off the fence now” and has “decided” what to do about the proposed TV debates?

    And his decision is He Won’t Tell Us.

    How does he get away with this tripe?

    • 209
      Groucho says:

      He thinks we are all stupid and the BBC helps him treat us as such.

      • 223
        TOUGH ON SCUM TOUGH ON THE CAUSES OF SCUM says:

        At Least In The Debate He’ll Find Someone Who Want’s To Talk To Him !

        • 239
          Gordon man of our times says:

          Brown was whinging to boulton that the Media were stopping him getting his message to the people. Well wouldn’t a live debate solve all that? Plus as Boulton pointed out Gordon had one uninterrupted hour of Prime time TV yesterday to get his message across.

  57. 199
    Guardian Tosser says:

    I used to read the Sun inside the Guardian so people thought I was brainy until they asked me why I was reading a newspaper 12 months old upside down.

    • 293
      A big boy did it says:

      I used to read the Guardian inside a copy of Readers’ Wives.

      • 313
        Inglorious Basterd says:

        On the commuting train to London, I used to read the Guardian inside a copy of Playboy magazine so people wouldn’t think I was bent.

    • 398
      South of the M4 says:

      I have tried reading the Guardian upside down. And still it makes no sense.

  58. 205
    A pair of saggy ol' Spaniel's Ears says:

    Can YOU guess whose floppity dugs are under the Giraffe print?

  59. 207
    Porky Pies MP says:

    The Sun is read by thick, knuckle scraping chavs who will vote whichever way the Sun tells them. And that is the problem for Labour, but seeing as they have created the horrible chav culture in this country they deserve all they get. As a newspaper the Sun is better used as an emergency supply of toilet paper or to clean up dog faeces.

  60. 211
    dr spock says:

    spot on guido,this is brilliant fun

  61. 214
    Anonymous says:

    GORDON BROWN ATE MY HAMSTER

  62. 222
    + + + NEWSFLASH + + + says:

    Noo_Lie_Bore “LOST IT”

    Had the phoney funny party EVER “got” it ?

  63. 233
    techno says:

    You’ve got to laugh. On social policy, Brown has become more Thatcherite than Thatcher ever was.

    • 235
      techno says:

      Apparently.

    • 243

      Quite, and all the more amusing to compare and contrast the audience reaction to her name whispered by Ben Bradhsaw and the virtually selfsame audience’s reaction to a rollcall of her policies set out a day or so later by Mc Snot. Muffinheads.

    • 247
      Michael says:

      There is NOTHING Brown won’t claim to be, if he believes it will help him cling on to power a bit longer.

      • 281
        Geordie Boy says:

        Brown is beyond shame,embarrassment and parody. After going down on all fours to try to lick Obama’s arse, he then gets his wife to act as his cheerleader. Fucking hell. Has the man no dignity?

  64. 236
    THE SUN says:

    Maybe We Could Get All These Teenage Mothers To Become TOPLESS Models On Page Tree Then They Would’nt Need Benefits FWOOOOOOOR !

  65. 238
    Troughy says:

    Just glanced at Sky news. They had a building ( The Sun’s I think ) with a chimney with a ‘coolie hat’ on top. Like the Vatican. The Sun’s has blue smoke belching from it.

    Titter.

  66. 262
    What Gordon Meant to Say says:

    It cannot be right when people receiving benefits are allowed to bring up babies on their own. Insurgent Labour will ensure that every parent who is unfit to bring up their babies will be brought into our National Care homes and looked after until they can pay taxes.
    Bringing up babies is too difficult for ordinary Sun readers to do on their own. They need our indoctrination and advice so that they do not foul the streets and cause us to miss our recycling targets.
    Our old people need our care also. They should be kept in their own homes so that we can keep them under observation and control their production of greenhouse gases.
    The tories don’t care, they would have people driving around all over the place making decisions for themselves. How heartless can they be?

    • 294
      Parish Councillor says:

      Lebensborn project 258?

      Labour policy now lifted from the BNP

      Revolting.

      This used to be a civilised country with an Empire. This is what happens when the great unwashed, semi educated take over.

    • 295
      THE LABOURIAN RACE says:

      Your Children Will Be Educated In The Ways Of The Party And All Thoughts Of Conservatism Removed From Their Minds ! Your Reward For This !Is A Lifetime On Benefits In The Land Of Milk And Honey While You Knock Out The next Generation Of Labour Voters !

  67. 264
    Anonymous says:

    COR, WHAT A TOSSER

  68. 272
    THE LABOUR PARTY CONFERENCE says:

    Move Along Nothing To See Here !

  69. 277
    Moley says:

    Accolade for Brown. You Gov Poll.

    “63% of viewers thought his speech was good or excellent.”

    http://www.yougov.co.uk/extranets/ygarchives/content/pdf/YG-today-TopicalQuestions.pdf

    Methodology.

    They asked 673 adults who watched it.

    If that isn’t a self selecting target group, I don’t know what is.

    Who but the most die hard Labour Supporter could watch that rubbish?

    • 297
      Alan Philip Bonggg says:

      Exactly. What was the point of the poll?!!

    • 300
      Inglorious Basterd says:

      Yes and all 673 of the them were sat watching it in the conference hall.

    • 304
      jgm2 says:

      Yeah. But it’s like all his budget speeches. It’s just all bullshit.

      It’s only after folk go away and think about what he’s actually said or what this is actually going to cost that they realise ‘Hold on….’

      It’s the ‘Triumph of the Will’ imagery that worked for Blair. Packed halls filled with cheering supporters. People get swept up with the mood.

      But once they go home and think about it and once they see the analysis in the papers they’ll realise it’s just the same old lies. The trick for Labour and Brown will be to engineer as many stage managed events like that as they can in the run up to the election. Just as Blair used to have literally a busload of ‘spontaneous supporters’ following him around everywhere gurning into the pre-prepped TV cameras. Everybody loves a winner. Folk get swept up in the mood. They want to believe in the hype.

      Leni Reifenstahl would be so proud.

      But that is why so many folk are so enraged. They had a massive majority. They could have done anything they like. They could have done so much good. They could as they promised, have swept away devisive party politics and worked for a better, united country.

      But no. They did, in fact do everything they liked. It’s just that they are so utterly incompetent and so ideologically raddled that they fucked it all up.

      I could weep.

      • 327

        The Government generally can’t do “good” as the state is force and Force is amoral.

        Mostly the government does “good” and trumpets it, but hides the bad used to fund it.

        The government that does least, does best.

        • 349
          Idiot with the memory of a goldfish says:

          And the City and the Banks do it best of all!

          • The volume of credit was too large.

            Regulators decide on the volume of credit and Banks allocate it.

            Banks fighting for deposits to lend a limited amount of credit would be best of all (and was the situation pre Browns FSA disaster).

          • Idiot with the memory of a goldfish says:

            CDS’s and CLO’s

            look them up and stop pretending the poor bankers didn’t have any choice but to leverage themselves to a level gamblers anonymous and loan sharks would gasp at while raking in Billions in Bonuses

            Brown was an incompetent buffoon and totally failed with the regulation oversight and credit rating and but the Banks and City made the bets and took the bonuses

            you get into bed with the financial sector don’t be surprised when it fucks you and runs off with your wallet

    • 310
      THE LABOURIAN RACE says:

      These Muppets were Creaming Their Knickers Over His Speach! Where Have they Been For The last 12 Years ?

    • 311
      secret_undercover_tory_at_the_beeb says:

      As we have seen with the selction of Question Time & other BBC audiences, nothing is left to chance.

      These people are selected. All political audiences are selected by Pravda on their allegiance to the Common Purpose.

      BBC Pravda radio phone in’s – isn’t it obvious that the Unions & the dying Labour movement are deluging the call centres with fake callers?

    • 362
      Brown's a Tosser says:

      YouGov/Sky poll is a load of rubbish. If NuLabour get a bounce from this I will be most surprised. Those propaganda videos before each major speaker were very interesting though, full of usual NuLabour spin and falsehoods. There is no depths to which they will not sink.

      • 419
        Willie says:

        Actually I was one of the 660 odd and I can tell you I said I thought the speech was rubbish and made no difference whatsoever to my voting intentions. I am alarmed if anyone can be affected by a speech like this so I suspect those who reported a misty eyed return to Labour were lying for tactical reasons. I respect You Gov and they are usually pretty accurate forecasters. Any bounce will be a dead cat one!
        More interested in supporting Norman Tebbit to become DG of the BBC. Go Norman!

  70. 302
    Alan Philip Bonggg says:

    I’m surprised they found 673 adults who watched it. Normally they would aim to poll at least 1000, but obviously struggled.

    • 430
      Anonymous says:

      Exactly. I’d like to know how many people replied to the question, ” Did you watch Brown’s speech?” with ” Are you fucking kidding me pal!”.

      • 465
        Grandma B says:

        The only way to watch a Brown speech is with the volume off most of the time, listen occassionally in order to heckle and then off with volume again! It really works. It also helps if you’re ironing, or reading a newspaper or a book at the time – that’s what we ladies call multi-tasking.

  71. 306
    good morning says:

    So Labour policy is now to copy the BNP over teenage Mums? What the hell is going on in this country?

    And here we all are, mostly Tories in various shades of blue wishing on Call Me Dave, who with the greatest of respect doesn’t have a bloody Policy on anything.

    All the poor sods, including myself, know is that whichever our next Government is elected those troughing, self serving, arrogant, impressionable, shallow, inexperienced tosser MP’s will do is TAX US MORE.

  72. 314
    THE LABOURIAN RACE says:

    Our Single Mother Baby Factory Slogan Will Be “LABOUR FOR LABOUR “

    • 330
      Alan Philip Bonggg says:

      What’s the difference between a single mother and a single man?

      Single mother’s sperm count is higher.

  73. 325
    AJ says:

    Didn’t Bonkers Gordon, even by BBC standards, get an amazingly easy ride this morning on R4′s Today?

    • 365
      Reflex says:

      He did

      But Sian Williams on BBC TV roasted him !!

      But the BBC News Channel (on repeat) didn’t show the bits that GB badly fluffed

  74. 329
    Depressed? He ought to be says:

    Brown’s speech was wooden and boring – no costings for anything. Sarah Brown – ridiculous, does she want to run for PM? no? well get off then. How much more Michelle Obamaisms could she steal – he loves our Country, he’s messy etc.

    He may well be messy – how about ” he is a control freak desperate to remain PM at any cost, please be nice to him…..”

    • 358
      Jethro Tugg says:

      What Mrs Brown meant was that her lad Gordon leaves all his Farmy Farm animals all over No 10, he is so untidy!!

    • 380
      Max says:

      He’s messy and loud. I immediately clicked she meant his farts. Put me off my dinner.

      • 388
        Depressed? He ought to be says:

        you’re right – ‘hes messy and loud’ – so is Les battersby but I don’t want him wife droning on about it on tv.

      • 486
        Jan says:

        She’s very unoriginal.. ……..Michelle Obama has said Obama is messy and had bad breath because he smokes. Might have worked for Michelle but certainly doesn’t for clodhopping Madam Brown. If you saw the Brown’s out together you’d swear they were on day-release from the local asylum. Their body language,their clothes,their general demeanour just shouts freaky and weird.

  75. 331
    okubax says:

    If The Sun says it then “so be it”. I’m voting Tory next election anyway but The Sun’s backing now has made my decision look ‘gooselike’
    I’m so sorry for the state of British Politics

  76. 333
    Don't labour Labour with the detail - that's too much detail says:

    Milliband on Newsnight – this bugger is supposed to be taking decisions on behalf on my family for the future?

    My God – simply staggering and simply incredible that this nothing can be in that position of power and influence.

    When he was up against the wall,he simply said to the effect “well you’ve got me on the detail Paxman,but we are better than the Tories so there.”

    • 357

      Don’t ALLOW these fools to make decisions for YOUR family.

      Take some fucking responsibility back.

    • 400
      It's a funny old world says:

      The classic line from Ed Miliband to Paxman ” if you’ll just let me finish !” after about 5 minutes of this and about 5 repeats of the phrase a clearly exasperated Paxman said ” Will you stop saying THAT? I want you to finish what you’re saying……………”

      Bloody hilarious ! Car Crash TV at its best.Who said that there is no humour in the Labour Party ?

      • 484
        Jan says:

        O/T but really funny.Paxo was walking around the stands at the conference when he came across a woman standing in front of a funny looking little car.Apparently she was from Tameside Council and was flogging some kind of new energy efficient car? Not sure but anyway Paxo asked her how much it cost to exhibit at the conference.She wouldn’t say.Paxo was most upset that council taxpayers were funding this pathetic little stand. So council tax payers are funding the Nu-Liebor conference.Disgusting……..

    • 434
      The Ape man commeth says:

      Murderdoc was the first person the Scottish Monster prostrated himself to before he openly launched his coo to become PM.

      Watching the little milliebuttplug last night just shows how far the mighty working class party come, at one time the not spoke about inbred member of the privileged family was kept out of the public eye, down in the country pile, but since the advent of the grinning thing and nulabore the guilt ridden posh fucks believed that even the dodgy mongrel could get his feeble little lilly-white spongy hands on the privileges and benefits of power, something the nobs hadn’t been able to get away with for a long time. But as we see the wheel has turned full circle and the party spoke for the people who once fought tooth and nail to change all this shit now brazenly do it themselves. What’s more, this fatuous little lord Fontlaroy was recently propped up as a successor to the Scottish Monster! can you picture the little wet fart strutting about the globe as Prim Minister of Great Britain, taking the big decisions, and saving the world Ha ha haha arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

  77. 343
    Ever Vigilant says:

    Brown’s speech required 50 drafts .

    Are we being too hard on Brown ?

    It isn’t his fault if talented speechwriters are hard to find nowadays is it ?

    He has not been in charge of the education depatrment .

    As usual poor Gordon cops the blame for something entirely outside of his control.

    There is a proliferation of nasty people on this site .

    regards ,

    Kevin Mcguire

    • 359
      Jethro Tugg says:

      50 drafts of Special Brew methinks!!

    • 374
      Brown's a Tosser says:

      Kevin McGuire just another Labour Drone. After the speech he was positively having an orgasm in front of the camera on interview. A complete numbnut.

      • 409
        Ever Vigilant says:

        Don’t say nasty things about me .
        It is not my fault that I can see no wrong in the labour party .
        Iwas born in the north east and my dad started braimnwashing me before my umbilical cord was cut .
        It is unfair that you tory toffs are allowed to make up your own mind about politics .

        regards,

        Kevin Mcguire

  78. 370
    Depressed? He ought to be says:

    According to Lab09 on twitter Harriet harman is supposed to mention the Sun later – given that it is not likely to be in the kindest of terms may I suggest that ‘The Sun’ do a special page 3 dedication for her and in the interests of equality bring back the page 7 fella for the day?

    • 433
      Not long till labour gone says:

      “Labour’s deputy leader said her party was “angry” at the paper’s decision to desert the party but urged members to use it to inspire them to victory.
      “We may be the underdog but we won’t be bullied… this underdog is biting back,” she told the party’s conference.”

      Wish the dog would just be put down and out of its misery.

    • 435
      Captain Haddock says:

      I only hope for everyone’s sake the Sun pays Harperson NOT to get her mams out …

  79. 379
    The perfume seller says:

    The only time I have met Brown was about two decades ago – outside Harrods trying to flog perfume in the great perfume scam – he had a load of accomplices who would buy the perfume from him to show the innocents that it was bona fide – I watched these same buyers then walk around the corner and hand the perfume back to other accomplices and then return 10 minutes later for a fresh crowd of innocents to be fleeced.

    Now 20 years on he is doing the same with us.

    Of course we can’t call the police cos they are too busy defending the scum who bullied the Pilkington’s – after all,they have their rights too, you know?

  80. 406
    drakes drum says:

    Guido asks if an IQ test should be a pre-requisite for voting. I believe there is a far stronger case for denying the vote from those that sponge off the Country. The long term unemployable, who delight in not working but living off the state.

    I do hope that the Conservatives make these people perform work, cleaning streets, grafitti, polishing sewers etc. making local area’s clean and tidy. It would also introduce many to soap and water!

    • 412

      Won’t work – up until the 1960s (if I recall) in the US voting was linked to taxpaying which had the effect of excluding African Americans from the polling booth.

      • 477
        Ever Vigilant says:

        Margot Ledbertter had the right perception on this when she said to Jerry
        ” Democracy is a wonderful thing . But ,why give it to everyone ?”

    • 482
      Jan says:

      No representation without taxation perhaps.

  81. 411
    Rob says:

    Personally I was rather disappointed that Gordon Brown didn’t get really tough in his speech. I had hopped that he’d step up to the plate and make the 2010 elections interesting but the Labour Party Conference I think has totally failed to make it big in my minds eye.
    More of my thoughts here: http://wp.me/pyq3l-3W

  82. 416
    Dave.C says:

    You’ll never have it so gooooood.

    Gulags for all!

  83. 427
    Baron Cheapskate in Gutter says:

    Who will be the First Bonking Labour Minister for a SUN Tanning ?

    Gordo???

  84. 460
    A firm pair of breasts says:

    Labourlist seems to be under a cloud of depression at the moment.

    Yippie!

  85. 461
    Hugh Jardon says:

    Campbell has just been bleating on ITV ” News” & stated that Blair will come out & campaign for Brown at some time.
    If losing the Sun’s support was bad enough…

    One can only hope that the widow of that kindly Dr Kelly counters this & smacks bLIAR in the teeth.

    Bastard!!!

  86. 463
    Hugh Jardon says:

    Would this be the right time to mention what fun I had with the big girlies at the local ‘naughty kids home’ in the early 1980′s?
    Gulags for Slags….one way of keeping all the feral lads in one place, “sniffing”!!!

  87. 493
    Belfast Dave says:

    The fact that the Sun has stopped backing Labour since Brown came in as P.M confirms to me what I already suspected, that he is doing a more honest, a more courageous and a more true left-wing labour job as P.M. than TB ever did. Yes it would be nice to have the Sun’s backing but we have to remeber who these Sun journalists really are, a bunch of public-schooled anti-europe, homophobic, racist petty nationalist bullies. Good on Brown for staning up to the Sun and showing a bit of backbone! Just a shame this country is filled with so many twats that agree with the Sun.

    • 495
      Anonymous says:

      guess you felt slightly differently about sun journalists when they were behind Labour huh?

      so why dont you just go fuck yourself twat

  88. 499
    Belfast Dave says:

    No i didn’t feel differently about Sun journalists when they were behind Labour, if you read what I said then you’d realise that I didn’t admire Labour for going after the support of the Sun, although I’ll admit it was important

  89. 500
    Hoping for a sane world says:

    For an opportunity change your thinking about public sector services and to have the greatest challenge to your thinking for free, book your session with John Seddon at the conservative party conference

    http://conservativerealreform.eventbrite.com/



Another Twittish Tweet from Kerry McCarthy | BBC 
What’s the Point of Our Anti-Business Secretary? | Ruth Porter
HuffPo Hiring Pro-Iranian Mehdi “Act of Desperation” | Fox News
Krugman is Seductive, Simplistic and Unrealistic | Jeremy Warner
Lower Taxes, Higher Growth, the Statistical Evidence | CPS
Bash the Unions, Gatecrash the Quangos | ConservativeHome
I Told You So: Euro is Doomed | Douglas Carswell
PM Speaks for the Nation When Bashing Balls | Quentin Letts
Time for an Alliance | Dan Hannan
Farage’s Plan | ConservativeHome
Guardian Open News is a Failure | Heather Brooke
Balls Calls for Deeper Cuts | Speccie
Lessons from the Thirties | CPS
PMQs Idiots | Harry Cole
Jon Cruddas is Not the Messiah | Dan Hodges

Previously Seen


Peter Botting



Lord Lamont told ITV News…

“I think the PM is just human and Ed Balls is a pretty irritating person”



AC1 says:

Gangsters keep their promises, unlike party manifestos.



Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives








RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive


Labels
Guido Reads