BBC Guardian Co-Sponsoring Research
The BBC is viewed by many right-wingers as the broadcasting arm of the Guardianistas. The Beeboids argue that this is unfair, and that the BBC is an unbiased, objective, public service broadcaster. The BBC and the Guardian jointly sponsored an ICM survey into public opinion about the Iraq war. Guido can’t
recall a time when the BBC has got into bed with a newspaper like this – imagine the uproar if the BBC had co-sponsored a poll about immigration with the Daily Mail. Birds of a feather flock together?












Bastards, both of them.
the best way forward would be to storm the offices of the bbc and guardian and drag out the war propagandist executives and journalists and broadcasters and shoot the c’unts in the back of the head.
innit.
just in case I didn’t make my point clearly, the reason that would be the best way forward is because it would mean far less deaths than the alternative.
and the alternative is:
GORDON BROWN DRINKING SOLDIERS BLOOD BY THE GALLON WHAT A FUCKING VAMPIRE WHAT A FUCKING BLOOD DRINKING NONCE!
SOS SAVE OUR SOLDIERS FROM THE VAMPIRE CIA AGENT GORDON BROWN
PLEASE SAVE OUR SOLDIERS FROM THE COCKSUCKER GORDON BROWN
GORDON BROWN STOP DRINKING BRITISH SOLDIERS BLOOD YOU FUCKING C’UNT YOU ARE ENCOURAGING THE ENEMY TO FORM A COALITION YOU DOPEY CRIPPLE YOU ARE DOING THEIR WORK FOR THEM
YOU TOTAL FUCKING SPASTIC!
TROOPS OUT NOW!
IF NO ONE ELSE HAS GOT THE GUTS THEN I WILL STAB THE STAKE INTO THE VAMPIRE’S HEART – AS DEEP AS I FUCKING CAN AND I WILL KEEP STABBING THE SATANIST UNTIL THE MOTHERFUCKER IS DEAD
DEAD MAN BROWN YOU ARE DEAD DEAD DEAD
YOU VAMPIRE BLACKMAGIC MOTHERFUCKER
FUCK YOU C’UNT
SOS SAVE OUR SOLDIERS FROM THE SCOTTISH VAMPIRE NONCE
Hmm, you exhibit signs of paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis, but mostly you are just a nonce.
In this case however, you have arrived at a reasonable conclusion, in the same way that a monkey masturbating over a typewriter might inadvertantly hit some keys to randomly generate the same message, given enough time.
I have to say I thought the same thing myself.
me too
I say old boy- tone it down a little! It’s one thing to be jolly cross but quite another to be so aggressive!
Well said Guido. Perhaps it will also help to hasten the bringing to heel of this vast, profligate, self-serving organisation.
The BBC news regularly has Grauniad journalists on and has done so for 30 years at least. Their reply to my complaint of bias was that Grauniad journalists were professionals!
The BBC is crudely one sided on support for ZaNu, for global boring and for the EU, but they have convinced themselves that their positions are neutral. The only option is to break it up and sell it off. In the meantime don’t buy a TV licence.
The BBC regularly has contributors from right wing papers such as the Daily Heil, The Sun, and also right wing talking heads unfortunately including that gobshite Kelvin McKenzie, not to mention that Zionist wing nut mad Mel Phillips every week on Moral Maze.
You are obviously so used to the Grauniad reporters you don’t realise that they are not BBC employees.
The Sun for most of ZaNu’ s tenure was a New Liebore supporter. I cannot recall the last time I heard a Mail or Telegraph reporter (rather than occasional columnist like d’Anconna). The BBC doesn’t often have Mirror reporters on either. It is just Grauniad journalists that proliferate. This is especially strange considering that the Grauniad is an unpopular, loss making (and lying) rag.
Shouldn’t that be shitehawk?
Birds of a feather flock together?
There was no need to add the question mark Guido.
great post by the way.
I HATE THE FUCKING BBC
I HATE THE FUCKING GUARDIAN
I HATE THE BROWN GOV
Every single person who works for the Biased Broadcasting Conspiracy should look deeply into their shaving/lipstick mirror, repeat to themselves, “I am as big a traitor to the British people as William Joyce/Lord Haw Haw ever was; I knowingly contribute to the repression, subjugation and infantilisation of my own people, and I fully deserve the inescapable punishment awaiting me for my vile treachery.”
They should then shatter the mirror with their faces.
“I knowingly contribute to the repression, subjugation and infantilisation of my own people”
Nice. I like that. Sums it up perfectly. Don’t forget the role of wimmen in the infantilisation too.
…the BBC is an unbiased, objective, public service broadcaster.
In some Beeboid’s la la land fantasy maybe. To the rest of us they are the broadcast arm of the Liebour Party, while the Grauniad is the print version.
May they both suffer badly from an incoming Tory government, sooner rather than later please!
These organs are the vanguards of the liberal consensus, a far more dangerous and pervasive dogma than mere socialism.
Agree. What’s their real agenda though?
To own you!
An unwitting testimony of the truth, as the old maxim goes – judge by actions, not words.
By their deeds shall you know them?
” ….and that the BBC is an unbiased, objective, public service broadcaster. ”
Straight from the Gordon Brown school of soundbites. Say the exact opposite of what you really are and fly in the face of the evidence to the contrary that all can see.
Why do we put up with this crap?
The bias is hotting up. More noticeable than ever lately. Not many new jobs out there for ex BBC journalists and producers.
Yep – I wonder if there is a apprenticeship in delusional narrative writing for washed up lefties to sign up on ?
Yes, it’s called the establishment.
They’ll end up working for the NSPCC or some similar charity that has long outlived its purpose buts spends millions on TV advertising to twist our arm into giving them more of our cash for no obvious purpose other than to lecture us on the TV about chastising our children.
Was it a phone survey?
Phoney.
Guido, can you please change the advert it keeps disrupting my concentration?
The posterior should remain for posterity for all NewGirl’s followers..!!
Seconded. We want it back, please, Guido.
If you are talking about the “Evony” advert I see you point.
Actually I can almost see her points!
Seriously though, what magnificent breasts – she is obviously very talented, and should go far.
When was the last time you saw any right wing view offered on the bbc?
It just does not happen. It is institutionally biased. It is supposed to represent all views. The major issue with the beeb is ofcourse it’s bloated funding that we all pay for and goes to making the lefty stars even more wealthy; no wonder they ask us for money for the poor all the time because they are sitting pretty. These stars even now appear on QT. Since when does their so called entertainment talent qualify them to be politicians? Why doesnt the beeb just drga some one off the street to appear on QT? its the same thing!
I don’t know, Simon Scharma appears a lot (or is he on ITV?; I think BBC) and he doesn’t seem to enchanted with the socialist view of the world.
Perhaps not , but he abides by the liberal consensus agenda and doesn’t ask the real questions though I’m sure he knows them. The old queen.
BBC Execs admitted bias a couple of years ago
… they probably wouldn’t admit it now though :(
The real problem for the BBC is their reputation for being unbiased etc.etc. Once lost, I doubt they will be able to regain it.
The question then becomes why would you want to support a disreputable organization with public money? The probable answer is that you wouldn’t.
The incestuous relationship between government and news organization has hastened the demise of the latter.
A squalid end to a once great institution.
The real problem is demographics. Young people are done with TV. Too boring. Hence the tendency to appeal more and more to its one streadfast audience – overweight women living on council estates.
The BBC is losing 1% of its audience every year thanks to kids no longer being sucked into its evil influence by seemingly benign programming like Blue Peter.
blagger – a robber
blagueur – a pretentious talker; a joker, a teller of tall stories
claque – a body of sycophantic followers
BBC – the robbers’ jokers club
A state broadcaster involved in smearing opposition politicians and lieing to the voters. An organisation that is becoming overtly biased politically and in the views of their entertainers, for all left wing issues. A state sponsored broadcaster that has spun and peddled lies on behalf of a discredited and increasingly desperate and unpopular government, run by an unelected nutcase, arrogant and corrupt.
Is this Iran?, or Zimbabwe?, or China, Burma? No this, sadly is the UK.
The BBC should be purged, the last sad activity was to support Browns ridiculous attack on Cameron and Coulson, which has back fired making has beens like Clarke and that pillock Prescott look totally foolish. It has made the BBC look stupid and biased.
Cut the license fee, purge the organisation, and stop paying Ross £6m pa, which is £115,385 per week, or £16,483 per day, and £2,885 per hour for a 40 hour week. Is he worth it, bollocks he is.
Than you, spleen vented
Bollocks, he isn’t.
Bollocks he is … meant to indicate that Ross is not worth it.
You got it!
Fairly accurate summary there ! Don’t forget folks, visit the Biased-bbc website and have your say – unlike toenails blog, you wont be mederated (well, not unless you’re Atlas having a bad lizards day).
Please try you up-most to get through your collective heads, the following.
The BBC does not work for the Labour Party, it does not work for any form of consensus, it does not work for anything in the slightest bit liberal, it does not even work for the self interests of the employees of The BBC.
However the BBC does work for something, which goes by the name of WORLD FASCISM, headed up by the OWNERS of The World Central Bank.
Or put it another way;
The BBC works for The British/world ESTABLISHMENT pure and simple.
Which basically means The BBC is working 100% or the time for the same people virtually everyone else is working around 85% of the time for.
The BBC, and the rest, are doing this whether they know they are or not.
AGW is also a product of The Rothschilds.
We know where you live.
Be careful Atlas that kind of talk gets people killed – ask my mate Abe.
Meds are working well today.
Are there any off-world reptilians involved in this global hegemony?
Toadnails.
Hint to AtlasS. The film “They Live” is fiction, not a documentary.
The series of films on you tube – ‘ The Money Masters’ is not though.
You have unveiled our secrets and must be destroyed, American moron.
The Daily Mail is a “right-wing” paper and hated by the BBC, the Guardian is the paper of choice at the BBC. On my visits to the BBC offices The Guardian is much in evidence, other papers much less so (freebies excepted), The Telegraph is rarely seen and The Mail …
The Guardian says the BBC is biased and supports it with mathematical proof:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jun/26/bbc-anti-israel-bias
About as much use (Iraq poll) as tits on a bull then.
Guido you dumb miserable Hoon, it was a poll on the war in Afghanistan not Iraq, and it showed strong public support despite the deaths.
George Bush would probably have called it Iraqistan, which shows about as much understanding of foreign policy as the man in the street when faced with a loaded questions such as do you think British troops are doing a good job, do you think our armed forces are making a difference?, Patriotism is the last resort of the scoundrel by which I mean this Government, the BBC and the Guardian.
I wouldn’t call 47% strong support.
Liebour think 20% in the opinion polls is strong support at the moment, so 47% for any government policy is a wet dream to them…
The Mail is rarely seen at the BBC because it’s a shite paper, get over yourselves.
What self-serving left wing bollocks from No.25. Rupert Murdoch may be a c.u.next tuesday, but you’re not far behind, you’re just more irrelevant. I agree the Mail ain’t great, but neither is the Grauniad, and what’s even more galling is that the truly appalling Kevin McGuire of the Mirror seems to have a residency all of his own at the BBC.
We all know the BBC is biased. One would have thought that they’d have the sense to treat the incoming Tory government with some equanimity and save themselves from the inevitable bloodbath: instead, the bias seems to be getting worse and worse.
As the election appraoches, they will become even more Nulab!
Certainly is. They seem to be intent on going down with the sinking ship. Sociologists call it “an escalating commitment to a failing course of action”. Comes about as a result of not being able to admit to yourself that you are wrong and then being obsessed with taking on those that are against you in a doomed attempt to demonstrate you are right.
Basically they are as fucked as the Sinclair C5.
The gruniard is always seen at the BBC because it’s a shite paper.
The mail is shite, its all “celebrity” Bollox !
What and the Guardian is a good paper? You’re having a laugh. The Guardian would be out of business were it not for the tax payer propping it up.
It’s lefty twats like you that we devote our entire “Diversity Outreach” section to.
……and next week children the BBC and the Guardian will be showing you how to build the Great Wall of China out of toilet rolls, with free downloadeable maps and detail and how to bring peace to ther Middle East……
Bomb them both
The BBC are not only institutionally bias, it is also institutionally stupid. If they had any oil in their lamps they would be much more aware of the Labour bias and make an effort to correct it. They will have no right to complain when the Tories take and axe to the bloated BBC.
Oil in their lamp – what sort of a metaphor is that, wo/man? These vestal virgins have been whoring the truth, left, left and left. Rocket up the arse might do it. If there are any intact bits left afterwards, I will happily contribute 2p for their online operation.
I think the bias grows out of their astonishing stupidity. Listening to Rick Nobinson is like listening to a over-excited six-former on his first TV presenting job delivering his opinions on the basis of what he has learned about politics from 7 years listening to Guardian-reader teachers and “Newsround Extra”.
Nah.. they did one with Disney,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6983841.stm
Gannet:
http://www.pr-inside.com/usa-today-abc-news-bbc-and-r69131.htm
Several with ITV too.
Yawwwn..
As a devout Catholic, I thought I’d share the levels to which other media will stoop to get their evil message across.
Regards,
Tom
My father had a nifty solution when i used to throw a tantrum in the house, he used to pick me up and dump me on the doorstep outside in the cold. It didn’t take me long to learn my lesson :-)
Up until fairly recently the Beeb used to take out at least two pages of adverts for jobs with the Guardian. Journalists seem to flit between the two – Polly for example – and if you ever go inside a beeb building you’ll see their paper of choice liberally scattered around. The Guardian is pretty much the Beeb’s yardstick for what they consider to be on message: The Mail is the opposite and sneered at because, er, it happens to be popular. Something which cannot be said of the Guardian.
The funny thing is were you actually to visit the BBC
you’d see the most influential papers are the Mail and
The Telegraph. If it’s on the front page or page 3 of either
of these papers it will be in the Six by the evening.
BBC is only too keen to roll out the State is Great and Good For You mantra. But when was the last time it advertised in The Telegraph, The Mail or The Times for staff?
Global warming is bad and you must be taxed even more to stop it, I can’t see the Chinese falling for that one.
It is anti capitalist, anti free markets and persistently pro EU. It is time that it was privatised or simply closed down.
The proposed Politics Pen group on Newsnight consists of XanuLab clones, cheerleaders with not a Tory, Limp Dem or Scot Nat in sight.
Imparital broadcasting on UK politics is a joke, with fawning interviewers queuing up to lick the arse of Goron McBrown.
I suppose it’s appropriate that the state broadcaster is in bed with the taxpayer-funded newspaper.
Okay, I have to laugh at the irony of the BBC actually sponsoring this article as well, with a video advert for its poetry contest. “Waste money, it’s what we do.”
“The Beeboids argue that this is unfair, and that the BBC is an unbiased, objective, public service broadcaster.”
Oh no they are not!
Just see how the BBC in Scotland behaves. Its rumoured that they have a Labour party supporting war room behind the news room, with a direct link to Labour HQ. Main function to spin against the SNP.
Just look at their reporters. Glenn Campbell, Brian Taylor, Douglas Fraser, Gordon Brewer (not to mention Kirsty Wark). All Labour party sympathisers! Ditto the people they invite onto the programme Alf Young, Bill Jamieson, Alan Cochrane. Their CEO wanted to deny Iain McWhirter invitations to speak on political programmes because he critisised BBC Scotland at the broadcasting inquiry.
And then of course there the deceipt they perpetrated about BBC Scotland making programmes when they were actually being made in London. Johnathan Ross programme (made in Scotland) a lie. What they were doing was depriving BBC Scotland of funding to make programmes and covering it up.
Impartiality? They don’t know what the word means.
Glenn Campbell is a joke !
Indeed. Their head of political broadcasting and news is an ex editor of some labour student rag.
Romanian dicators would be proud of the way they connive to portray everything is rosey in the garden.
The one eyed uselsss Hoon should go. And all their cabal of lackies also.
Do you think El Gordos apporved all this spinning under the guise of , “we are at war(?)”, and propoganda comes first?
Guido, any news on why Edinburgh police officers are harrassing bloggers on the Scotsman, targetting their personal lives and businesses etc? and it all leads back to their own websites?
the bbc suck donkey balls
Why else do you think where I live is called 100 Acre Wood?
The BBC and the Guardian colluded with Labour on the Andy Coulson smeargate and would have persisted with it if the BBC and Labour had not smelt the coffee over the public backlash as the death toll in Afghanistan mounted. The groundwork for this well planned offensive to get the Tories spin-doctor was kicked off by the most perplexing revelation a few weeks ago that Gordon Brown was furious at the criticism coming his way from the Guardian.
I know, everyone take time to go WHAT CRITICISM!!!? This is what passes for Labour subtley and cunning, as the Guardian regurgitated old hat about Andy Coulson, Gordon could say nothing to do with me Guv I don’t like them. His first utterence on the subject from the G8 conference was serious questions had to be answered and hadn’t the Conservative chairman of the Commons select committee not said this very thing. Note, he is busy at the G8 saving the World but totally up to speed on who was saying what about the “get Coulson smeargate”.
The final proof of a Faustian pact by the Guardian and the BBC to do everything they can to support Gordon continuing in office was the timely appearance of this jointly commissioned poll showing rather fortuitously that support for the war in Afghanistan had risen. Note the play on risen downplaying the fact a majority were still against the war. Now we have the results of an ITV commissioned poll which says 59% are against the war in Afghanistan. I know which figures I trust.
Suits me if the Beeboids and Grauniad want to support Gollum in office. The longer he’s in the worse the eventual wipeout of Labour.
Right-on Guido, expose the duplicitous, biased bastards of the Biased Broadcasting Corporation! You are right – they see nothing strange about getting into bed with the Guardian, where most BBC jobs are advertised after all, but with the Daily Mail – not a chance in Hell!
Why would you advertise in the Daily Mail?
It doesn’t even have a tv reviewer let alone
a media section!
Most BBC jobs are now on the BBC website.
One or two still go in the paper with the
largest Media Section… But even the Telegraph
adverise there now and again!
Once Gordon and his fellow traitors are put out of their misery how on earth do you begin to purge the BBC and all the other infected parts of national and local government along with all educational institutions?
Where do you begin?
By a clause in the employment contracts of BBC employees, just like the one which cause a civil servant to be sacked recently for an email in disgust over the Hazel Blears affair
Easy. Compulsory random drugs tests on all beeboids. Anyone caught with ANY illegal substance in their body gets the sack.
That should take care of a lot of them in one go.
Loving all the BBC ads via unruly media.
BBC panorama re torture of CIA prisoners in USA. Unbelievable,…………………… yet believable!
Yes imagine the uproar if the BBC had co-sponsored a poll about immigration with the Daily Heil that showed popular support.
For immigration.
They are making the mistake of confusing our total support and appreciation for our troops with support for this Governments lamentable record in this war !
I remember ranting at the television when, halfway through the 1997 election campaign, the BBC (impartial in General Election campaigns???) suddenly went full-on in support of Blair.
After twelve years in the trough, the Beeboids have become Teletubbies, fat, and detached from reality
Problem for them is that less people watch the BBC now than in 1997, and the bigger the noise they try to make to gain attention, the more their bias is revealed
I think you will find most beeboids and Guardian readers use the same drug dealers and rent boys.
The BBC news front page tonight –
Why more helicopters may not help UK forces – the link leads to a story headlined – Helicopters are no magic wand – W T F is going on. As PE said shut’em down.
But did you not see our Supreme Leader on Songs of Praise talking about Courage? Which, incidentally, is the name of his book.
How the BBC managed to turn a religious programme into a book plug for the most hated Prime Minister in history takes some real doing.
Next on Songs of Praise – Jacqui Smith talks about how lust can lead to downfall. Followed by the network premiere of Anal Boutique.
As some commentators have said, the Beeb is a known hotspot for druggies. If they introduced random drug testing there’d be a national outcry at the result.
And The One Show has its own resident sex pest now! If that happened in any business, he’d be looking for a new job. Double-standards, huh?
Yes this is a much bigger story than Coulson and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
I recently had a message deleted from Robinson’s bbc blog.
It was over the frenzy on the bbc over the Coulson “affair” with them trying to get him sacked.
It stated “Is the Gruniard, bbc, and NuLiebor the new axis of evil”
It was deemed off message and inappropriate – at least I got a reply.
why should i pay for a service i hardly use?
this is suposed to be a modern country,not north korea.
it must change when we get britain out of this left wing chaos that we are in.
Contrast the BBC’s reporting of this discredited, dishonest, corrupt and ruinous shower in Government with its attitude during the last year’s of the Major administration, when journalists were openly hostile.
Leftie BBC reporters could not wait for New Liebour to take power. Even when they managed to be even handed for the majority of a report, they still managed to twist the knife in the summing up.
The old “It remains to be seen,” “serious questions remain”, “time will tell whether” and “but insiders say” lines.
As in: “So the Tories say they no longer have any desire to see the ritual slaughter of the nation’s babies but serious questions remain and only time will tell whether they can convince the public that they have given up the killing of children.”
Of course, the Major administration was shite in many ways but, while it fell apart, the government machine was still being reasonably well managed and we weren’t simultaneously paying ruinous taxes while running up 50 years of debt.
Like the vast majority of the armed forces, i would not pee on the BBC or The Guardian if they were on fire.
Treasonous b____ds hate the armed services.
I like BBC ads. Nice post. Thanks for that.