May 18th, 2009

So Much for the “End of Capitalism”…

PM SinghAfter record gains in 2004 India’s communists were close to power.  They derailed India’s economic liberalisation, curbed further deregulation, opposed moves to make the labour market more flexible, and prevented privatisation.   Now the 700 million strong electorate has comprehensively rejected them and their left-wing allies.

The decisive victory of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a committed supporter of  globalisation, has led the Bombay market to surge 10% on the open this morning.  The American century has passed with the Anglo-American investment banking model  stumbling, so it looks like the Anglo-Indian model of capitalism will drive the rise of the next economic superpower.  Private capital is going to flood into India again.  Capitalism is still the greatest way for humanity to raise standards of living and reduce poverty.


231 Comments

  1. 1
    Mark says:

    By hook or by crook I’ll be first in this book

    • 12
      and soon says:

      By fook!

    • 82
      Economics master class for the benefit of Mr Fawkes says:

      “Capitalism is still the greatest way for humanity to raise standards of living and reduce poverty.”
      When kept on a tight leash, like a dog, yes that maybe true.
      As long as there is a global minimum wage and as long as companies and banks that are bankrupt are treated accordingly then you may have a point Guido.
      As neither of those circumstances are in place your comment is purely rhetorical.
      Your grasp of economics is very poor.

      • 135
        fewqwer says:

        Yes! Let’s make the ‘global’ minimum wage £100/hour and we’ll all be rich!

      • 164
        Harriet Hatemen says:

        Actually should be £1000 per hour. Anyone opposed to this is a cruel, racist intolerant male who wants to make people work for low wages.

      • 165
        AC1 says:

        Economics idiot class more-like.

        the minimum wage is best described as a level of productivity that the state has mandated compulsory unemployment for those below.

        Barriers to employment do not help the economy and thus society.

      • 194
        von mises fan says:

        Your grasp of economics is truly awful. A global minimum wage would consign india and China to less than African levels of wealth. Next!!!

      • 215
        Socialism killed 100m in 20C, Capitalism destroys poverty says:

        Oh please.

        Global minimum wage = an awful lot of people aren’t going to have jobs. And they will starve.

        ‘that maybe true’ – care to point out *any* alternative system that has raised so many people out of poverty, over *any* length of time, let alone the staggering short period in which China and India have managed to do it? You can’t.

        I recommend ‘Economics in One Lesson’ by Henry Hazlitt.

      • 217
        Dave R says:

        ‘Barriers to employment [such as the minimum wage] do not help the economy and thus society.’

        Crap that even die-hard capitalists like the USA can see to be untrue.

        The minimum wage does two things:
        1) Stops people having to work for starvation wages. They get enough to live on – an arguable point, but they can live better on a minimum wage than £1/hour or the like.
        2) Weeds out the sh*tty companies that can only survive through mistreatment of their workers. If you can’t afford the minimum wage, you don’t deserve to be in business.

        Look at how businesses were bleating about massive job losses just before the minimum wage came in in 1997. And did those job losses happen? Did they hell.

        They only wanted labour on the cheap, and once the minimum wage came in they paid up and shut up.

        The only massive job losses were when those same businesses f*cked up our economy 11 years later.

      • 219
        AC1 says:

        Dave R,

        If people wouldn’t work for less than the minimum wage cos it was a shitty job then companies wouldn’t be able to pay it and recruit.

        Companies work using what is called MATHS. If a role generates x profit then the pay must be <= x. Therefore if a person cannot be productive enough for the state then they have to live on benefits.

        Do you run a business? I do. If you want a market derived i.e. real minimum wage then a citizens dividend funded by an LVT and zero taxes on income will create a base pay that will allow people the freedom to choose to earn extra income, but make companies compete for employees.

      • 220
        Dave R says:

        ‘If people wouldn’t work for less than the minimum wage cos it was a shitty job then companies wouldn’t be able to pay it and recruit.’

        Read up on unemployment benefit legislation. If you refuse a job – and refusing it on pay is no exception – you get your benefit stopped. Your argument doesn’t work when 2m are unemployed and would be forced to work for starvation wages without the minimum wage.

        And like I said, even the USA has a minimum wage – and if they do it, die-hard capitalists that they are, there must be some rationale. Like the weeding out of rubbish companies.

        ‘Companies work using what is called MATHS. If a role generates x profit then the pay must be <= x.’

        What exactly is your point? Companies would be going bust left right and centre – even more so than at the moment – if all the roles in each of them didn’t generate more profit than the minimum wage.

        And the people on the shop floor – those most likely to be earning the minimum wage – generate far more profit than the minimum wage they are likely paid.

        Nope, I still prefer the idea of healthy businesses that can afford to pay the minimum wage paying it so that people don’t starve, and badly run businesses going to the wall because low pay isn’t an option anymore.

        And why do you – alleged business-owner – take such exception to that? Does your business need a visit to see if the minimum wage is being paid?

      • 221
        Dave R says:

        Oh yes, and time has told.

        Businesses only went to the wall when big business collapsed the economy. And not in 1997 when the minimum wage came in, nor in the following years.

        The ‘minimum wage hurts business’ has been proven completely wrong. Business has survived, for the last decade here and for decades in the USA.

    • 105
      going down the pan says:

      BREAKING NEWS SMOKE RISING FROM EU BUILDING IN BRUSSELS (sky news) probarbly all the eu crooks burning their reciepts!

    • 146
      Wayne Bruxelles says:

      A fire has broken out in the basement of the headquarters of the European Commission in Brussels, officials say.

      A BBC correspondent outside the Berlaymont building says thick smoke can be seen pouring from the roof. At least three fire engines are there.

      THREE FIRE ENGINES ? WOW ! Must be a bad fire. Whole waste paper bin gone up, has it?

      Fucking Euro Beaurocrats. Can’t even organise a records removing burn

      Hoons

    • 222
      thespecialone says:

      India’s neighbours may not do as well as India…why may that be then? Because the Indian people believe in capitalism and hard work to improve their lot maybe? And dont entirely rely on aid (although why the UK are given them aid I have no idea). And have truly democratic elections…errrrr unlike many of her neighbours and indeed African countries?

    • 229
      Winston Churchill once said: says:

      “I cannot pretend to be impartial about the colours. I rejoice with the brilliant ones, and am genuinely sorry for the poor Browns”.

  2. 2
    • 35
      (yes I am a cunt / no I am not Nu Labour) says:

      I don’t know what I’m agreeing with, but if Guido said it consider me 100% aboard. I’m all fired up and ready to a bit of angry typing.

    • 185
      LocalLad says:

      So India joins the western gluttony club while many of it’s neighbors are still starving along with the rest of the third world.

      I suppose that’s something our MPs will have no problem with supporting.

  3. 3
    freddie flintoff says:

    oh eck back to the cricket

  4. 4
    Tom Fullery says:

    Is it true the speaker is to receive some sort of parachute payment when he leaves?

    If so I’d like to pull a few strings and make him jump from higher up!

    • 11

      Without the parachute, I hope.

      The Penguin.

    • 96
      Cutting Cutter - I cut things - it's what I do says:

      I’d like to cut the strings – no – just sever them enough so they ‘twang’ one . . . by one . . . by one . .

      Just so the bastard drops the last hundred metres – sorry – yards – ‘au natural’ – as it were – or should be

      • 163
        Harriet Hatemen says:

        Thought criminal! How dare you persist in using yards? Our masters have declared that we must use European measurements. You’re probably a white male little-englander like winston churchill.

        You need sending for diversity re-education.

    • 182
      going down the pan says:

      i’d give him a fucking parachute with no stings attatched!

  5. 5
    Anonymous says:

    The photo of that Indian political dude looks remarkably like the photo of the Scottish Speaker dude in the post below.

  6. 6
    Blank Xavier says:

    Capitalism is also the only ethical arrangement of ownership.

    If I work to create wealth, that wealth belongs to me.

    If someone takes it without my consent, that is theft.

    All contracts must be voluntary and well-informed; the only exception is self-defence.

    I accordingly assert taxation is unethical and should be illegal.

    • 48
      (yes I am a cunt / no I am not Nu Labour) says:

      Zounds!
      I hereby ask the question of your assertion. Verily, how doth your beautifully child-like system deal with speculation / LBOs etcetera?
      Who hath worketh to create the wealth of lake and rîver and babbling brook?
      Wheretofore shall the state raise money so that water doth flow through pipes? Or shall thee only sip evian from the bottle accordingly? Shall thy vehicle be ambulated round thine garden or would you thus want to travel on roads?

    • 86
      works for a livin' says:

      fucks sake we’ve got one of them greasy , unwashed protestor types managed to freeload so time on cyberspace. Either that or an A level sociology student enlightening us with their superior knowledge of the inequitable system.Hoon

    • 126
      Alien I - IV Fan says:

      Taxation is theft? sure, I can agree with that.

      Seems to me though that there’s little point debating such fundamentals when a criminally corrupt political class has disarmed the populace and sold out our country from under our feet.

    • 162
      Spike Spiegel says:

      I agree in principle Xavier, but to be able to work requires a police service, a judiciary, a law-making body, an education system and (arguably) a health service. They have to be paid for somehow. I agree that taxes are far too high, the state is far too pervasive, but we need some level of tax or our work will just be taken from us by criminals with a far less concern for morality or ethics than I either of us.

      • 175
        AC1 says:

        > an education system and (arguably) a health service

        Rubbish! Both of those are personal expenditure not best funded by extortion.

        Parents should pay for their own childrens education.

        People should pay for their own health.

        In these two areas the role of the state should be limited to making sure parents ARE educating their children, and that promotion of group health (herd immunity) measures such as vaccination programs.

      • 203
        Spike Spiegel says:

        So then you’re determining wealth by which vagina you came out. I’m not in favour of targeted wealth redistribution or positive discrimination but you need to provide a mechanism which promotes social mobility. If not the classes become arrogant and corrupt, develop a sense of entitlement and decay (hmm, sounds familiar).

        But then I suppose I do have a personal interest – if it was up to parents to provide education there’s almost no way in hell I would have been able to achieve this nice middle-class standard of living. I’d also be dead from a previous illness.

      • 205
        peter carter-fuck says:

        Commissar Spiegel has a nice ring to it don’t you think?

    • 170
      AC1 says:

      Income taxation is totally immoral and akin to slavery, however Land Taxation is not, as the right to land is a externality that is currently undertaxed (the tax raised should fund a citizens dividend so people can buy their own insurance, rather than the states meagre producer captured ration).

      This has led to the current housing bubble.

  7. 7
    • 65
      Vimeiro says:

      No, that’s good news. If only he’d endorsed our Olympic bid.

    • 88
      Honest Bob says:

      He’s a fucking Jock, what the fuck does he know about footy? Hoon

    • 176
      Sir William Waad says:

      I wish Gordon had gone out in the quarter-finals, like England do. Better still, I wish he’s gone out in the qualifiers to the Faeroe Islands, like Scotland do.

  8. 8
    sd says:

    Hear, hear, hear!!!

  9. 9
    Sir Fred Goodwin says:

    Leave the poor Bankers alone!!!
    So they lost a few Trillion in Credit Default Swaps and C.D.O ? So what ?
    You can’t make an omlette without losing several hundred Billion and relying on the Taxpayer to bail you out and save your Company from your own greed and incompetence.
    That’s just good old fashioned Capitalism.

    Thank heavens for the Indians and their deregulating fervour.
    I mean that IS what they are going to do right ?
    They are cleary ahead of the game as the rest of the Financial World rushes to start deregulating again in earnest.

    I hear Ross Perot will be making a comeback too.

    • 46
      MarkE says:

      Sir Fred, you of all people should know that the banks did not willingly go to the government for taxpayers cash; Darling saw his opportunity, redefined the word “insolvent” (at the time most had sufficient reserves to meet their obligations as they fell due, he unilaterally and without consultation increased the proportion by which bank assets were required to exceed liabilities) so he could apply it to the banks and require them to increase their capital when the markets were dead. The only option then was to sell shares to the eagerly waiting government. He thus managed to nationalise the banks, and blame the banks for wanting to be nationalised. Deleting clause 4 from Labour’s constitution was a purely cosmetic excercise; they still aspire to place all wealth creators under party control.

      As spin it is a thing of great beauty, as politics it stinks.

      I am not in any way connected with the banking industry except as an account holder, but I can see that the real Sir Fred Goodwin is a far more moral person than any and every politician, prosepective politician and failed candidate. That does not make him a moral person in absolute terms.

      • 213
        Sir Fred Goodwin says:

        Quite right sir!
        I BEGGED The Government not to give me hundreds of Billions for my busted Bank, Oh how I begged. But they would not listen!!! Likewise I was on my knees pleading with them not to give me a Pension fit for a king but they twisted my arm and sobbing I reluctantly had to agree.

        And you can imagine how shocked and distraught all the other Banks were to be in reciept of untold Billions of Taxpayers money. They were desperate to go it alone and sink or swim as had been the norm before. But again the bullyboys forced all those Billions down their throat and I can still see the Headlines of all the Banking Executives as they tried vocally and repeatedly to tell the Government to bugger off and stop feeding them Taxpayers cash. Alas! All in vain.

        And well spotted Sir! Those Banks are now little more than a Stalinist cadre of Moneylenders who cannot pass water without Government say so. If by “Nationalisation” you mean free to do exactly as they please without the curbs on their Legendary greed and incompetence that the Billions should have bought which is the same rights any shareholder should be due.

        And I AM a moral man. Just ask my customers and staff.

    • 91
      Doctor Mick says:

      This naive post gives sarcasm a bad name.

    • 198
      broken egg says:

      “You can’t make an omlette without losing several hundred Billion”

      Lefty mantra.

  10. 10
    Anonymous says:

    Order-Order.

  11. 13
    Anonymous says:

    Trinity man

  12. 14
    The Grim Reaper says:

    This is what ZanuLabour “socialists” like about capitalism, Guido:

    From todays Daily Mail online:

    “Married cabinet ministers Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper made a claim for almost four times the amount of mortgage interest to which they were entitled.

    The couple, who are among Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s closest allies, submitted the claim for £2,600 for two months in 2007.

    But the House of Commons Fees Office pointed out that they were allowed to claim for only £733 and docked their claim accordingly.

    The officials also discovered that they had submitted the same claim, for the month of July 2006, twice.

    The cabinet ministers, who are each paid £141,866 a year, yesterday insisted they had made an ‘inadvertent error’.

    The husband-and-wife team also ‘flipped’ the designation of their second home to three different properties within the space of two years.

    The couple also regularly put in claims of £600 a month for food.
    In a statement, they said: ‘There was an inadvertent error in filling out our forms. This mistake was spotted by the Fees Office and the correct amount was paid.”

    • 39
      IQ Lower than Beckham says:

      Labour’s “Golden” couple

      Truly a pair of Golden Balls

    • 61
      Anonymous says:

      Time for a piggie cull at Westminster. Get the knives out.

    • 184
      AC1 says:

      No the Balls are “Real socialists*” it’s just not that an over-sized government has nothing to do with “capitalism”.

      * despotism with a slight delay. Socialism always inevitably leads to a despot. It puts the government above the people, and the people running the government as god.

      Everyone should be god of themselves only.

  13. 14
    A Pensioner says:

    What a load of rubbish. You never bet against Uncle Sam.

    Now lets get back to business – fucking Speaker Martin.

    • 22
      freddie flintoff says:

      fook that left a bad picture in my head

    • 47
      Anonymous says:

      Martin-the speaker who cannot speak!!

      hahahahahahaha!

    • 214
      thick as thieves says:

      Pensioner: you are john mccain and I demand my $5!
      but seriously, I am slightly concerned you may be suffering from some early stage indicators of alzheimers. as evidence I refer to your cretinous comment;

      “What a load of rubbish. You never bet against Uncle Sam.”

      uncle sam has spent over 500 billion dollars on war and occupation.
      and america has recently borrowed a further 800 billion dollarsbecause of its perilous fiscal position.
      and lets’s not forget that america’s economic stability is currently dependent upon the retention of dollars by china.
      when america stops wasting money on war and occupation it would definitely be a good bet, but right now the us is sub prime stock.
      junk status really.

  14. 16
    Karol 'n' Duffer says:

    If it ends in -sim, I say fuck it.

  15. 17
    Anonymous says:

    The decisive victory of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a committed supporter of globalisation, has led the Bombay market to surge 10% on the open this morning.

    IS YOU ON DRUGS?

    how is that evidence to support the hypothesis that “Capitalism is still the greatest way for humanity to raise standards of living and reduce poverty.”

    • 25
      1381 says:

      No wonder they voted for capitalism and globilization.
      They have pinched western workers jobs!!!!
      Multinats make bigger profits.
      British jobs for british workers say I.
      Bring back our industries and put our people back into productive work.
      McDonalds and Westminster is neither.
      This is the only way to pay off the national debt.
      Sod the Indians – they can have pure unadulterated greed if they want.
      I want to see people in this country able to make a living in British factories thanks.
      If thats socialism – which it ain’t – tough!!!

      • 34
        no longer anonymous says:

        Good morning Mr Griffin, do you have any more economically illiterate comments to share with us?

      • 42
        To my shame, I once voted Labour. says:

        Some mistake surely No Longer. Tis Mr Wat Tyler who had a bit to say about government in 1381.

        http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/England-History/WatTyler.htm

      • 174
        farqhuit says:

        @25

        Dear idiot – “british jobs”, you mean, factory manufacturing jobs ? ahh… right so we’re now able to compete are we? Who might we sell our goods to? The.. er..

        We do have a strong manufacturing sector – but it’s high technology and pharmaceuticals, not factory production lines and sawmills – this is the problem with your idea; you’re unlikely to be a profitable addition.

    • 32
      over the hill and far away says:

      of course it is you retard

      capitalism is not perfect but it is better than being controlled by a bunch of Scottish twats and their schoolchild policies

      • 59
        1381 says:

        Where have you been?
        This bunch of Scottish twats are the front for pure capitalism and unfettered greed.
        So capitalism is great is it\/
        \tell the British and American taxpayers that as they fork out trillions to the arch purveyors.

    • 62
      Anonymous says:

      Look what socialism has done Hoon.

      • 66
        1381 says:

        What socialism?
        We haven’t had it here for years.
        Anyway who says that socialism is the only alternative to unfettered capitalist greed.?
        We are watching a widening gap between rich and poor.
        A bit of narrowing please.
        If it takes ’socialism’ so be it.
        I reckon it just takes a bit of fairness and economic justice.

      • 186
        AC1 says:

        Sating your Envy kills people by creating REAL (not relative) poverty.

      • 216
        REVOLUTION NOW MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! says:

        Look what Thatcherism has done Hoon.
        All of the problems this country is facing, energy, Europe, greed, house hyper-inflation due to lack of house building and abuse of credit can all be traced directly to Thatcher’s door.
        But to be fair to her, despite the myth of her dominance she was in reality just the front woman, and was completely abused and eventually assassinated by her fellow Conservatives.
        What a shower!
        You could not hang tories because they have no spine for the rope to grip and snap.
        We will have to come up with another method to exterminate the dogs.

    • 94
      Honest Bob says:

      Do they get to vote for their PM? lucky fuckers, ours just waltzed in after Tone “there’s no deal and never has been” B-liar hopped of the visible gravy train.

  16. 18
    NotaSheep says:

    The BBC were particularly keen to “report” that neither Congress or the BJP would get a large enough vote to form even a minority government and would in fact be replaced by a coalition of minority parties. The BBC may have been hoping for that result but this student of Indian affairs is glad that the Indian government will continue to pursue its pro-US and quietly pro-Israel agenda. India and Israel are on the front line of the great war of the 21st Century and need each others help.

  17. 19

    Hardly on the verge of power. In 2004 the United Progressive Alliance (led by Congress) secured 222 seats. The CPI-backed Left Front had 59 MPs. It’s also worth noting one component of the UPA now is the Socialist Unity Centre of India, a self-described hardcore Marxist-Leninist organisation.

    Seems to me the ghost of Marx is very much abroad on the sub-continent.

    • 29
      Anonymous says:

      and the Communists appear to have taken a beating in West Bengal because of their aggressive support of private companies which pissed off rural voters.

    • 98
      Honest Bob says:

      where’s the rest of the seats? surely, if you take into account how many more times India is bigger than the UK they should have around 50 or 60 thousand MPs all at the expense of the taxpayer.

  18. 21
    The Admiral says:

    Wey hey! Jags and Rangies will be cheaper….. won’t they……?

  19. 23
    Freedom & Democracy says:

    “Globalisation” is a way for the New World Order to destroy whole economies at whim, and it’s working very nicely so far. Bankers and politicians, who work hand in hand, have stolen our money.

    Globalisation is another word for Communism, and thus complete opposite to freedom and democracy – concepts that New World Order proponents such as New Labour oppose and have shown they oppose. How many promised votes New Labour refuse to hold, how many fraudsters they protect within their party, protecting drink and drug drivers who drive under the speed limit, protecting burglars, protecting muggers.

    Globalisation = Communism

    • 190
      AC1 says:

      War = peace
      etc…

      Globalisation = FREEDOM (of association, of travel) and anything else is immoral.

      Britain just needs to get rid of the “welfare” state (which we should anyway) to get the best immigrants, not the worst.

      It’s British socialism that causes British economic problems. To join the world in continued economic growth, we need to keep the marxist priesthood away from our fundamental rights (freedom of association).

      • 225
        Anonymous says:

        ‘Britain just needs to get rid of the “welfare” state (which we should anyway) to get the best immigrants, not the worst.’

        How about getting no more immigrants – full stop. Post-industrial nations do not require vast armies of workers, yet foolishly we have the largest work force in this country’s entire history. There is never going to be anywhere near enough jobs to go round, to think otherwise is simply fooling yourself.

        Cheep labour or new voters are the only reasons immigrants are ‘needed’ in this country i.e. not at all.

  20. 24
    i like gold says:

    i like India

  21. 26
    SS says:

    Dollar index going down to 40 imo.They can’t admit Keynesianism is ‘emperor has no clothes’ crap so it’s inflation all the way.

  22. 27
    Jim Kurtz says:

    Please find below my suggestion for fixing Britain ’s economy. Instead of giving billions of pounds to banks that will squander the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan. You can call it the Patriotic Retirement Plan:
    There are about 20 million people over 50 in the work force. – Pay them £1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:
    1) They MUST retire. Twenty million job openings – Unemployment fixed .
    2) They MUST buy a new British CAR. Twenty million cars ordered – Auto Industry fixed.
    3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage – Housing Crisis fixed.
    4) They must send their kids to school / college /university – Crime rate fixed
    5) Buy £50 of alcohol / tobacco a week there’s your money back in duty / tax etc
    It can’t get any easier than that!
    P.S. If more money is needed , have all members of parliament pay back their falsely claimed expenses and second home allowances

    • 36
      (yes I am a cunt / no I am not Nu Labour) says:

      Also:
      They must visit lapdancing establishments on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays.
      They must force their daughters to work in lapdancing clubs, unless their daughters are ugly or fat.
      The must by lottery tickets.
      They must dress in the latest fashions bought in selfridges.
      They must eat 6 boxes of Crunchky Nut Cornflakes everyday.

    • 49
      Call Me a Cynic says:

      You forgot the forego a state pension bit as well,f

    • 68

      Sounds all very National Socialist to me.

    • 101
      Doctor Mick says:

      1) They MUST retire. Twenty million job openings – Unemployment fixed

      No. 20 million unemployables in jobs they cannot perform.

    • 177
      Sir William Waad says:

      Pretty much what Sir Oswald Mosley said in 1932.

  23. 28
    Anonymous says:

    Rubbish. I remember as a lad when everyone thought the Japanese were taking over the world and American technology companies were written off. Now America totally dominates computing and the internet with Google, Apple, Microsoft, Dell, Adobe, Oracle, Facebook, Twitter, WordPress etc. It might say Made in China/India on the box but it was created in America and American’s importance in the world is only going to increase when it has such control of the most important technologies

    • 30
      The Admiral says:

      Yes agreed … BUT its all shipped over here in containers and, as you say, “Made in China”

      How are we supposed to pay for it anyway?

    • 144
      Wayne Trombono says:

      USA
      best country in the world

      UK
      sweaty shithole

      Harsh but fair

      PS
      Socialism never did nuffink for anyone
      except the wan’ers that work in Local Gov.

      LESS GOVERNMENT LOWER TAXES MORE FREEDOM MORE CIVIC RESPONSIBILITY

      • 180
        Silvio Talli says:

        *
        IT IS SAD SACK IN BHAHGHAHDHAHD THAT IS DOING ALL THE SWEATING SUKKA

        ASTA

  24. 31
    Mr Christopher says:

    The “end of capitalism” is plain silly. Adam Smith is our man, born in our island home, whose theories need apply nowhere but here to be of value.

    Bring in alien ideas – das this and das that – and what do you have – a petrol bomb or two, a cock-sparrow on a campus dung-hill, even a petty crook like Derek Hatton of long ago….

    Let us have a system that is not in thrall to the United States, not in hock to crooked bankers overseas, not riddled with agents of influence from foreign goverments, and perhaps we might once more find our “greatness.”

    Until then, we have globalists who will sell out the little guy for their own chance to be aboard yacht with Mandelson, and all those enemies sailing close aboard our English shores….

  25. 33
    HAB says:

    Indian success has been bought at the cost of hundreds of thousands of British skilled jobs. The IT sector has particularly badly hit. The lives of many have been destroyed. It is not the case that they can easily ‘go and do something else’ as employers will not take them especially for someone over forty.

    Skills are going to waste. People are going to waste. Young people have little reason to gain skills if they see those that worked hard to gain them are thrown away like this. It also means there is less tax paid and hence less pension contributions made to keep everyone.

    It is long-term economic madness to allow this.

    • 51
      Angry Geek says:

      Our IT sector sucks, having surly sex offenders screw up your exchange upgrade for the 5 time running while running torrent trackers from the DMZ is a recipe for getting in some nice polite Indians to run it 24/7 without leaving bottles of vodka in the bin.

      And don’t even get me started on the legions of ‘programmers’ who can do little more than bang their faces on the keyboard until the bug magically goes away. Or the piss poor project management bimbos who can’t even state a requirement unambiguously, never mind put in place a process to verify its completion. Might as well get your cut and shut software clusterfuck implemented in a Bombay accent.

    • 109
      Anonymous says:

      so there are squillions of call centre operatives standing beside the manufacturing industry in the job centre, at least they won’t be phoning me up at all hours to see if I want new car insurance.

      • 210
        peter carter-fuck says:

        I had that Russian meerkat on the phone, told him to fuck off or I’d set Churchill the dog on him.

    • 114
      Bob Dobalina says:

      Now who thinks the minimum wage is a good thing? It’s always seemed obvious to me that if you have to pay your cleaning staff more than a skilled tradesperson in another country then you’re doomed. Our coal was to expensive to produce so the mines closed, now Mrs Mop gets minimum wage, the price of fags and cheap wine jumps to keep up with her pay and soon we’re more expensive than our competetors. Jobs lost

      • 226
        thick as thieves says:

        bob,
        you are fooling yourself with your silly thinking.
        if the minimum wage had not been introduced there would have been blood on the streets.
        probably yours you fucking c’unt.
        take you bob, you offer very little, if any value to this place.
        indeed, following the capitalist model, a cripple like you should be charged to visit this place and to post your imbecilic comments. yes, what a good idea.
        how much do you think a retard like you should be forced to pay to come to order-order?
        ten pounds, twenty or thirty pounds a month.
        you would pay it as well you dick.
        how do you like those apples bob?

  26. 37
    Keith Waz says:

    straight as a die me

  27. 38
    Ratan Tata says:

    lend us a tenner

  28. 40
    Anonymous says:

    Capitalism is still the greatest way for humanity to raise standards of living and reduce poverty.

    And just really have you had your head this past couple of years?…shame on you. You think anythings changed…enlighten me with that rather all encompassing statement

    have you not just watched the rich (bankers) and their friends defraud your average joe

    • 55
      Red Alert says:

      You’re right, because we’re going through a recession we should immediately adopt communism and return to the halycon days of the USSR.

    • 74
      Power to the people says:

      We have to presume the bankers “friends”are this current lab govmt who failed to control the banks properly

    • 102
      deeznuts says:

      sorry….i thought it was the labour government that “lost” all our money….then pinned the blame on the bankers

      • 121
        Power to the people says:

        please refrain from putting the word sorry & labour government in the same sentance

      • 171
        Liza N Krupschen says:

        Even if it’s ‘this sorry Labour government’ … ?

  29. 41
    Ratan Tata says:

    anyone fancy a Jag? cheap as chips £30K or the whole company for a rupee.

    done? I have been.

  30. 43
    Jag Singh says:

    Shit
    My dad is PM of India

  31. 44
    Jack Hackett says:

    Manmohan Singh is one great leader. He leaves the Chinese warbling around trying to make friends. I reckon his next move will be to source uranium from Australia for cleaner power. A great man and a great leader.

    • 140
      Nemo says:

      Just what you would expect from a Sikh – good people.

      • 224
        AC1 says:

        Sikh++

        –Islam

        Lets see the relative econmies of Indian civilisation via Islam in 20 years time.

        Middle East = Africa v2.

  32. 45
    Baroness Uddin says:

    I’ve always said Capitalism’s just the ticket

  33. 50
    So17 says:

    Britain is on a one way slippy slope into a third world shithole.
    The productive indiginous population is being outfucked by everyone else.
    The film ‘ Idiocracy’ is bang on the money.
    Do you want fries with that?

    • 78
      Cicero says:

      It always struck me in the 60s (you may not be of an age to recall it), when the FO liked to say their role was now to ‘manage decline’, nobody ever said how far the decline was supposed to go.
      Or, indeed, if it was supposed to stop at all…

  34. 54
    It does not add up... says:

    I do hope Guido isn’t trying to suggest that India is corruption free. World rank is 67 for corruption (1 is least corrupt) and 48 for democracy (1 is most democratic).

  35. 56
    It's all Balls says:

    They’re going to need help building the infrastructure up before they have any chance of becoming a superpower.

    Let’s volunteer the worst offending MP’s to go dig the roads and lay the railways.

    I know it’s hot but hey – if you can’t stand the heat etc

  36. 60
    Anonymous says:

    _+_+_+_+_+ BACK THE SUN CAMPAIGN TO GET RID OF BROWN+_+_+_+_+_+_

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2434097.ece

    I BET THIS CARRIES MORE WEIGHT THAN ANY PETITION

    • 76
      Devonport Dave says:

      Amazingly the Mirror still try to feebly back Brown.

    • 143
      Canary Wharf Rat says:

      Strange. Up to now the Sun for the past year has struck me as fence sitting. Having backed Bliar and Newliars (It was the Sun that won it) they have seemed strangely reticent to tap into their core readers concerns when it comes to politics.
      Today front banner (on the net at least) calling for a General Election now.
      This is a milestone as effectively the Sun is now publically confirming that it’s support for NewLiars is at an end.
      Why would they do this? Do they have inside information on what’s about to happen so that they can then proclaim It was the Sun that made them or have they just come to their senses and realised what most of us known for some time and that is as a project NewLabour has failed this country miserably.
      The Sun likes to think and probably has huge influence amongst us, the great unwashed so this could be major news.

      • 168
        bergen says:

        Murdoch simply wants to be seen to have backed the winner so that he can behave as if the government owe him.

        O/T I see that scumbag Ben Chapman is bleating that his scam predates the FoI Act so shouldn’t be published.He is “distressed.”I really believe that the police need to deal with this one.Blatent fraud on the rest of us.

  37. 64
    Cato Street Conspirator says:

    Sounds a bit desperate to me, as if there was that niggling little fear that capitalism’s days were finished. Comfort yourself with this – feudalism went, so capitalism will go too. But not just yet.

    • 81
      no longer anonymous says:

      And what will replace it?

      • 92
        Cato Street Conspirator says:

        Well, when feudalism was at its height did anyone say, ‘With an industrial society in which the means of production are owned by a minority to which the majority sells its labour’? How can we know what will come but it will clearly be an advance on what we have now, just as capitalism was an advance on feudalism.

    • 197
      Bill Cash for Questions says:

      I’m with Cato on this one. Keen student of 17th century history will know that those who lived at the end of the middle ages were totally unable to grasp the nature of the enormous systemic changes that were to come. In fact, they consistently misinterpreted the signs of the emerging new order as symptoms of the decay of the old one. This is pretty much where we are now, I think; we cannot yet see how the pieces (including the internet and the decentralisation of knowledge, which has played such a critical role in the undermining of the current ‘government’) will fit together. Don’t worry dear, it will look altogether more logical to future historians.

  38. 67

    Capitalism is normal widespread free human interaction with a few rules; socialism is the imposition of widespread rules to distort normal human free interaction.

    Socialism rewards by input, capitalism by output. You can spot a subscriber to the former by their mantra “I work very hard so I should be entitled to the same sized house as you.”

    • 77
      1381 says:

      Socialism is trickle down.
      Capitalism is trickle up.
      And whats more enforced payments by the poor bloody taxpayer of billions of pounds to make sure it does trickle up too!!
      I just want it to trickle nicely, very gently, down hill to make up for past inequalities of the last couple of decades.

  39. 69
    Galloping Gurner says:

    Mcsnotty pisspants the one eyed gurner of ‘youtube’ fame will still hand over millions of our pounds to India even though we barely have 2 brass buttons left.

    • 113
      Anonymous says:

      And they will divert it to…, is it Nuclear Weapons or their Space Program which has the upper hand this year?

  40. 70
    SS says:

    Socialism In One Easy Lesson

  41. 71
    Devonport Dave says:

    Great news for British Employment,soon we’ll all be working in out-sourced Indian call-centres calling ourselves Dilip and Soraya while irate Indian punters mutter “If you can’t speak proper bloody Indian matey boy I’m changing to a bank that employs local labour”.
    And anyone who thinks “New Labour” is anything remotely connected to socialism hasn’t been paying attention,we’re all only too aware what it’s all about now.
    Won’t be long now before Indian newspapers report what’s going on here as “Typical Third World Corruption”.
    Brown should be strung up from the nearest lamp postand Sarah advised to make to sure she puts her knickers on every day to avoid the embarrassing legacy of Mussolini’s shag.

  42. 72
    Anonymous says:

    My experience of investing in India is they will welcome your money but you will never get a penny back – they will not let you take it out. So the only way you can cash your rupees is by trading them for something with forex value, like overseas royalties for Bollywood films – highly risky! Furthermore if you have any IP they will copy it and then shove you out. Infrastructure does not get built due to huge bureaucracy and multiple layers of corruption. Also major works to improve public health – eg water and sanitation, are non-starters as middle classes don’t want to pay for the untouchables who they believe will get their just rewards in their next lives through karma. Not sure it is a model of capitalism for the 21st century.

    • 75
      An Indian summer says:

      so what’s your point?

      • 117
        Anonymous says:

        Perhaps the Indians will have the same experience as us – a minority making a great deal and the rest making very little.

        It would suit a caste system very well.

        Loved the post earlier about the similarities of Feudalism and Capitalism.

        Attitudes change so slowly – wonder how much better our country could be if the elite could get over the embarrassment of the Norman Conquest.

        They still hang on to their wealth by doing everybody else down…..

  43. 80
    Call Me a Cynic says:

    I do not believe capitalism in its proper sense ever goes. It’s an individual thing and entrepreneurs have existed either legally or illegally in even the most socialist of societies.

    Our own government likes to play both sides of the argument. To its core vote it is socialist. To wealth creators it is light on regulation and happy to let wealth flourish

    The trouble is,they have been very selective – wealth creators are not just billionaires but include lots of us. We are however punished for not making enough profits to join the elite, nor be useless enough to not work at all,or have a state created job.

    We fund both ends of the spectrum. We can’t choose to live abroad and avoid the problem but we are deemed too wealthy to get any state support,so we get clobbered so the extremes can flourish.

    The same mixed message corrupts law making-it’s written to satisfy both the above positions,so it is often impossible to interpret or apply properly.

    I would welcome a shift towards capitalism provided the state does not interfere as much as it does now.

    • 107
      Doctor Mick says:

      entrepreneurs have existed either legally or illegally in even the most socialist of societies.

      There tend to be more prostitutes in socialist societies. The Soviet Union was teeming with them.

  44. 83
    peter carter-fuck says:

    Good to see that a Cambridge man is in charge of India.

  45. 84
    Damo Mackerel says:

    The 19th century was the century of the English, the 20th was the century of the Americans and the 21st will be the century of the Chinese.

    All societies are capitalistic by nature. The question is who controls the capitalism? Will it be the individual or the government?

    • 211
      peter carter-fuck says:

      If the government controls it, it’s called fascism, which is pretty close to the system we have now.

  46. 85
    Debitanostra says:

    Blair thought socialism was best left to fantasists.

    He was right.

  47. 87
    Sunonmars says:

    BREAKING NEWS

    DOWNING STREET : PM WILL SUPPORT THE WILL OF THE HOUSE OVER THE SPEAKER.

    Well theres support for you, bye bye fat hoon.

  48. 89
    • 139
      skinto says:

      SHOCK HORROR…….Brown takes with one hand what he’s already taken with the other whilst telling you that it’s a give away. fucking Hoon

      • 142
        skinto says:

        that’s pretty cool, every time i type the word Hoon in the magic of sibreiaspace changes it to hoon. fucking tops. Hoon Hoon Hoon Hoon

      • 145
        skinto says:

        this is cool, everytime i type the word Hoon in, the magicof siberiaspace changes it into hoon. now that’s magic. Hoon

  49. 97
    Anonymous says:

    Oh Guido! You’re so funny. It’s the way you tell ‘em.

  50. 99
    The Beast of Clarkenwell says:

    How long before we have some Hoon in a turban as prime minister?

  51. 103
    Jenny Taylor. says:

    OT

    But Gordoom’s on the box championing Englands 2018 World Cup bid, that’s that bu99ered then.

  52. 104
    Plato says:

    Oh NO!

    Gordon has just started his endorsement speech for the 2018 World Cup – ‘it is the RIGHT thing to do’

    Well that’s my bet fucked.

  53. 106
    Ambrose Silk says:

    You silly hoons, Gordon has strapped a load of semtex to himself and will go kaboom if his grasp on the precious is threatened much more.

    Tra laa!

  54. 108
    JD says:

    Hear hear! Capitalism is the only moral way to trade. JD.

  55. 110
    1381 says:

    Capitalism as we now see it.
    Ditto for here
    From one of Reagan’s finance ministers now somewhat reformed having seen what unfettered capitalist greed does to nations, communities and people.

    http://www.rense.com/general85/robwho.htm

    This what some of you want?
    I don’t. I am sick of being designated serf or peasant and bled for what little I have.

  56. 122
    who dunit says:

    EU headquarters on fire, Guido have you been playing with matches again?

    • 132
      It does not add up... says:

      Fire in the Press room. Too much hot air for Mark Mardell?

      • 199
        A Forensics Officer says:

        Following a thorough inspection of the site we have established that the blaze was started by a pair of Gordon’s pants.

  57. 124
    Anonymous says:

    David Cameron’s expense claims are larger than most.
    However he launders most of his claims through a mortgage, which has the added advantage of giving him a nice slug of capital to play with.
    He used to bung the capital raised, about £400,000 through a fund of funds hedge fund.
    Unfortunately said fund of funds hedge fund has gone belly up, could it have been Merebis Capital Management? Merebis went down in October 2008, two months after the Lehman’s meltdown and subsequent release of a giant financial toxic plume?
    Maybe the fund of funds was invested in Madoff or Stansford expecting 12-15%, a nice arbitrage bringing in £48,000 per year. That’s more than double you could get from traipsing around John Lewis buying Repro or Modern furniture and such. It all seemed brilliant at the time, but now those supposed insiders are really suffering. tee hee.

    • 128
      Anonymous says:

      Tra laa laa!

    • 137
      Anonymous says:

      Correct.

      The second home allowance should be means tested. A wealthy person like Cameron does not need to have a taxpayer subsidised mortgage but as you rightly suppose it does release a massive amount of capital for Cameron to invest elsewhere. Little wonder then, that Cameron says MPs should not make a profit on their second homes as he is making the profdit on the capital released by taking on the loan. There’s no flies on our Dave.

      • 200
        Oinks says:

        “I’ve done nothing wrong, its all in the Green Book (proprietor and editor McMartin, Shriker of this House)

  58. 125
    Anonymous says:

    Tra laa!

  59. 127
    Master Beater says:

    GF believes in flee speech

  60. 136
    Pete-s says:

    The EU building is on fire, has Jonah paid them a visit recently?

  61. 138
    A few lines, penned before lunch by the poet McGone-with-it-all, regarding two soon-to-be-shifted je says:



    Aye! – ye bust’ds twa’!
    Ye scemin’ pa’r !
    Ye leerin’ dwa’ o’ twastaes!

    Ye stemun’ shut’eps
    Druzlun ooze,
    Ya’ yooslus smeary creepas’

    Ya’ tha’ wa fools
    Ya’ sol’ ur’ jools
    N’ daemp’d’ ar’ nut’nl tris’a

    Ye lid’ ‘n plun’d
    ‘n noo ya’ damm’d

    gud ridd’nc!
    Fack ye

    [Translation :

    Yes! – you bastards both (twain), you scheming pair of leering (smarmy patronising grinning loons) twisting politicians, bending and preventing truth from being published abroad, such that all may legitimately know what goes on behind the scenes.

    You bring to mind steaming heaps of manure (shit) in a farmyard. Except that is produced by useful animals. Whereas you just ooze a stream of stinking effluent.

    You think we (the populace) are fools. You sold (literally and metaphorically) our jewels (national treasure of culture, intellect, money, influence, talent), and you dumped our national bullion stock.

    In addition you lied, connived and planned unspeakable acts. And now you’re dammed. Nothing can save you.

    So good riddance to you both. It hasn’t been a pleasure to have you here, – either of you.

    In the vernacular, – get stuffed!

    Commentary :

    The poet, sickened by the machinations of this pair that – however obtained and held – represent two of the highest posts in the land – and the Mother of Parliaments – seized by the idea of enjoying his meagre lunch yet full of bile that would prevent him enjoying what he has, – unburdens his anger.

  62. 141
    Anonymous says:

    HOORAH THE EU BUILDING IS ON FIRE.

    This can only be an act of GOD.

  63. 152
    plastic tray man says:

    does this mean that our daily membership fee will go up so as to build a new one?

    • 155
      plastic tray man says:

      how the fuck did that happen?

      • 157
        EUSSR Official says:

        Not once – but twice – and, who knows, even more?

        It’s the influence of the EU innit?

        Not even Guido’s IT department can escape!

  64. 159
    EUSSR Official says:

    DUPLICATION! – it’s what we do

  65. 161
    Les Noble says:

    More celebs in the house please!

  66. 167
    Sir William Waad says:

    Why is it that many foreign leaders seem so much more attractive than ours? Where is our Manmohan Singh, our Angela Merkel or our Lula da Silva? Even a Silvio Berlusconi would be more entertaining and probably more competent than our lot. There are some stinkers of course – Kevin Rudd, Sarkozy – and that dodgy American land-speculator who pretends to be black – but usually other countries seem to make better choices than us. Why?

  67. 181
    James C says:

    Is this the same Guido who was advising us to vote, among other more sensible suggestions, for the Green Party?
    The self-same Green Party who would derail economic liberalisation, curb further deregulation, oppose moves to make the labour market more flexible, and prevent privatisation.
    As well as forcing us all to live in caves.

    • 192
      S Tringham-Uppe says:

      Since there aren’t too many caves around, I guess that means there would be a whole new housing price bubble.

      • 195
        James C says:

        Cave shortage is not a problem for the eco-taliban, since they would cull the population to suit.
        There would only be the Toffs such as Sir Jonathon Espie Porritt, 2nd Baronet, Peter Robert Henry Mond, 4th Baron Melchett, and Charles, Prince of Wales, living in castles, and a few plebs to work for them, who would live in the aforementioned caves.

  68. 183
    The Wall Street Wailer says:

    *
    *
    *
    YE ARE ALL CHILDREN OF YHODGOD A DAM AND ABRACADABRAHAM

    YE HAVE LESS MORALS AND VIRTUE THAN MY HORSE

    FANGS FOR DA SUN TABLOID PLOTLINQK EARLIER ON

    *
    *
    *

    The Sun Is A Toerag Publication

    THEY WANT GAWDN TO BE LET OFF THE HOOK LINE AND SINGQKUR

    Silvio Talli Says

    IT WOULD BE MORE AMUSING TO LET HIM STAY IN THE BLAIRCHAIR
    UNTIL HE IS COMPLETELY UDDERLY AND TOTALLY
    PARALYSED
    *
    *
    *
    THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN GEARED UP FOR A FULL TERM
    AS PHONY TONY PROMISED THE BANGQKH OF ENGLAND IN EQKSTCHAYNDGJE
    FOR A FIFTY YEAR CREDIT NOTE THAT GUARANTEES THE BANGQKHS* CONTINUING EXISTENCE
    *

    RUSHING TO THE POLLING STATION IS THE SAME THING AS GIVING MORE CREDIT TO PARLIAMENT AS THOSE ANGLOSAXHUN BANGQKHURS IN THE BANQK OF ENGLAND SAY

    SHALOM KYBOSHDOSH TRINITRONS

    ASTA

  69. 187
    Ian says:

    From where I sit, which is right next to the edge of the Delhi equivalent of the Sarf Circular this can only be good news. Just outside my hotel there are families sleeping under a flyover bridge. Their kids collect refuse and other garbage during the day. They are all dressed in rags. Anything to improve their lives must be welcomed. Wild dogs abound and one of them caught my colleague with a nasty bite the other day. He is now undergoing a course of rabies injections. This city needs a big clean up and capitalism is most likely to achieve this. Also I hope the new government will crack down on car and lorry horns. There is a constant cacophony of very powerful air driven multi-tone horns day and night and it is driving me nuts and depriving me of sleep. Anyway let us hope that Delhi win the 20/20 cricket.
    Ian

  70. 188
    a chav says:

    is this the end of capitalisation?

    good

  71. 201
    TOMMY MACLOWERCASE FROM AMMERYKHA says:

    This Rhyme Is Ten Years Old

    THE END IS NIGH
    SAID THE PROPHET OF DOOM,
    NIGH MEANS NEAR AND NEAR MEANS SOON

    REPENT, AND CHANGE
    YOUR WIKKID WAY,
    OR GO TO THE DEVIL
    ON
    DGJUDGJEMENT DAY

    Asta

  72. 204
    Robespierre says:

    Quit right Greedo.
    Just look at how capitalism has eradicated poverty in the U.S., G.B., and other developing nations. All our children are well cared for and educated, and have bright promising futures.
    It’s such an obvious solution, make the ruling elite of India even richer and more powerful, they’re bound to pass their ill-gotten gains down to slum level.
    Even before the Indian election results were in, the brave Bombay Police were destroying shantytowns with the aim of re-housing the inhabitants in brand new sparkly apartments, with all mod cons.
    It’s a crying shame though that just as India prepares itself to be plucked from poverty by capitalism, it seems to have done just the opposite for us.

    • 212
      James C says:

      Jonathon Porritt says they all need culling.
      Every family with more than two kids is environmentally undesirable and should be culled, he says.
      There is no truth in the rumour that Lady Porritt is expecting the couple’s fourth child.

  73. 206
    Anonymous says:

    Of course middle-class elite like Guido would be celebrating. After all, who will be taking over India through the privatisation programmes? UK and American companies no less. It’s simply a new form of colonialism.

  74. 208
    WRAVVY WANGQKAR says:

    *
    PLUQKED IS WOT INDIA IS GOING TO BE

    WELL AND TRULY PLUCKED

  75. 218
    Fucking delicious! says:

    Capitalism is fucked; and you know it Guido…

    Fucking delicious!

  76. 228
    Aethelred says:

    Indians don’t give a fuck about poverty, apart from the Indians that live in poverty.

    • 230
      Ethel Fred says:

      *
      HARROWING STORIES OFPOVERTY~STRICKEN INDIANS LIVING IN LESTER
      ARE BROADCAST TO THE WURLD
      EVERY DAY FROM 7AM GMT UNTIL HAI NOON

      WWWDOT SPECTRUMRADIO DOT NETT

      Z 4 ZEE RADIO

      Bangalore Phil Says ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ







Nick Clegg said…

“Charlie Whelan and Lord Ashcroft are exactly the same. One is the baron of the trade unions, and the other one is the baron of Belize. Both are bankrolling political parties, both are trying to buy seats.”



+ Crude (June)
As of 16 Mar 2010
-Gilts (Mar)
As of 26 Feb 2010
Flat – No Positions
As of 23 Feb 2010 +30.81%

Realtime Portfolio Record


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives









RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive



Labels
Guido Reads