March 30th, 2009

+++ MP’s Expense Totals Released for 2008 +++

Download them here [pdf]. See your how much your MP has fiddled..

UPDATE : Guido has now uploaded the expenses as a webpage.


293 Comments

  1. 1
    The Inquisition says:

    Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency

    Financial misconduct = Conservatives

    • 6
      Minekiller says:

      Financial misconduct, war criminals, liars, thieves, incompetence, sense of entitlement, international laughing stock, whore users, porn viewers on the taxpayer, traitors = LABOUR

      • 149
        Dick from Redditch says:

        My MP Jacqui Smith claimed £9,652 for pornographic films, £12,105 for doner kebabs, and £14.95 for a king-size, jack-hammer, strapon dildo.

        What’s wrong with that? She’s only claiming what she’s entitled to.

    • 19
      Monkey Chops says:

      Slow off the mark today Inqi. Where are your chums Labour Pride, Ambrose Sulk etc? Liquid lunch give you some courage to start posting today eh?

      Porn on expenses = New Labour

      Ta taa!

    • 62
      Old Street says:

      er tra Laa?

      • 84
        Anthony Blanche says:

        What about that very old spread betting man thing?
        Stuart Wheeler dealer?
        He now wants the United Kingdom nincumpoop party (YounincumpoopP).
        Sauron’s Guidorc very quiet.
        Why, no biscuits if he posts anything on it?
        Here’s to independent Librarianism!

        Tra laa!

    • 63
      In the queue for the trough says:

      My MP has a constituency address within a few minutes walk of the local station and the train gets to London in 35 minutes. From there a tube train will take another 20 minutes. Many local residents commute daily and a season ticket would cost about £3,500. How come he claims over £16k for staying away from home?

      Financial Misconduct = Labour/Conservative/Lib Dem/ Flat Earth party (delete where applicable)

    • 95
      Anonymous says:

      I see you drew the 3 to 11 shift today flipping burgers.

      Fuck off
      Your comment about Camerons son is not and never will be forgotten or forgiven. Don’t stand near any lamposts. Dogs pee against them

      • 109
        The Inquisition says:

        Have you stopped battering your wife yet?

        Financial misconduct = Conservatives

    • 120
      Anonymous says:

      Tossing and putting in the expenses = Labour

  2. 2
    pp says:

    OT: 5 more MP’s may ‘know’ Nigel Griffiths brunette friend…

    http://www.juryteam.org/blog/?p=215#comments

  3. 3
    Tim says:

    Or how much your MP has legitimately claimed in support of his or her parliamentary duties…

    • 5
      davidc says:

      yeah, thats right !!

    • 7
      Minekiller says:

      that 23,083 quid……recurs a lot….

      • 25
        Anonymous says:

        I noticed that too

      • 36
        Plato says:

        Here’s mine – Mr Charles Hendry

        Cost of staying away from main home = £23,083.

        It costs £104 a week to travel to London Victoria from this constituency by train.

        I do it every day – I can leave at 0725 and get to Westminster tube by 0920 easily. Or be there by 0840 if I catch leave at 0705.

        WTF – £23k for £5000 of actual outlay????

        Can I be an MP please?

      • 57
        Anonymous says:

        143 counts of 23,083 – about 22% of all claims.

      • 185
        Man in the Street says:

        You’re on the money there.

  4. 4
    David Cameron says:

    I can explain everything.

  5. 8
    Nabidana says:

    Anybody find it amusing or otherwise that the President of Sinn Féin, Gerry Adams MP, who does not on a point of political principle sit in the House of Commons claims expenses for the cost of being away from home and actually costs more in expenses than most other MPs who actually take up their seats? Just from a quick scan, you see.

    • 40
      mitch says:

      You can thank Gorbals for that. Betty always said ‘no show, no money’.

      • 190
        Anon. says:

        Does Gorbals’ bitch still go shopping in Knightsbridge at our expense? More to teh point does fat bastard Gorbals eat it when she gets back?

    • 113
      Minekiller says:

      Nor really, he and his IRA pals claimed social security benefits from the UK taxpayer for over three decades, while he managed to become part owner of the very posh Culloden Hotel on the Belfast Lough shore….

      • 133
        John Major says:

        We will never negotiate with terorrists…

        Unless they blow up the City and Canary Wharf that is!
        After which the US realise the UK has a problem with representative democracy in Ireland and so tell us to get on with it.

    • 207
      Anonymous says:

      Ol’ Martin McGuinness is up to the same tricks as well, I see! I wonder how much he also claims via Stormont…

  6. 9
    Anonymous says:

    Snelgrove(Lab, Swindon South, mp MP) spent 20k on ‘away from home’ expenses. Swindon is 1hr and six minutes from Paddington.

    Hoon.

    • 14
      Anonymous says:

      by my reckoning, parliament sits for (at most) 200 days a year.

      That’s £100 a night if she spent EVERY night in London.

      What a complete crock of shit.

    • 41
      Invicta says:

      Paul Clark (Gillingham, Kent) £22,204.

      Gillingham is a 50 minute train journey to/from Victoria Station on a frequent service commuter route.

  7. 10
    davidc says:

    is there something magical about £23083 – so many m.p.’s seem to claim exactly that figure as the ‘cost’ of staying away from the main home (or am i being unfair to hard working and dedicated public servants?)

    • 12
      Anonymous says:

      I imagine it’s the max ‘allowable’ for that category.

      • 138
        Plato says:

        143 MPs have – see post above.

        And there are a load just under the radar hoping not to get picked up – wankers.

    • 260
      Sir Roger Sterling says:

      £23083. When I was young and doing expense claims for tax returns I was always told to round up unless it came to a suspiciously round number and never to use a number that divided by 52. Obviously our elected representatives follow the same logic.

      They just go on to forge the supporting invoices.

  8. 13
    Anonymous says:

    Pehaps somone could explain to me why the Sinn Fein MP’s are even allowed 1p in expenses when they haven’t even taken their seats in the House? Forget no taxation without representation – what about no expenses until you actually properly represent your constituents…..

    • 28
      MisterE says:

      Gerry Adam’s takes £21,131 for staying away from home expenses, but doesn’t travel to Westminster to take his seat in the House…?!?

      What the fuck?!

      • 29
        Newryordie says:

        In fact he also claims a further triple shed load of cash for being an NI Assembly member…….

  9. 15
    Dick Cheese says:

    And the outright winner of the most expensive office, at £105000, is Ms Clare Short.
    Not far away, at Bolsover, the pretend Beast comes in at a modest £45k.

    Uber trougher, Anne Keen goes on the podium at £104k. No economies of scale there with her pigging hubby, to no one’s surprise.

    • 27
      Dick Cheese says:

      The thieving bitch, Anne Keen, half-inched that spare ‘E’ and stuck it on the end of her name. Even the alphabet isn’t safe from these looting criminals. Give it back, Ann.

    • 45
      Minekiller says:

      Clare needs it to pay her booze bills

      • 97
        Anonymous says:

        re. the Short.
        Mite extravagant.
        Can’t fault a person who tees up the occasional scotch, but is she laying down a cellar?

    • 129
      Insane Jane says:

      The Keens really are the worst. The most greedy disgusting of all MPs. Calling them greedy pigs really does pigs an injustice.

      • 159

        They are not the only one’s. There is a whole raft of piggies in that list that are firmly in the trough with four trotters and a very enlarged snout. A complete fucking disgrace the whole lot of them.

      • 289
        iain, ni says:

        Even worse than the Robinsons of the DUP … and their family firm?

  10. 16
    Twizzle says:

    Went to the last page. For cost of second home, six of the lying bastards claimed exactly, and I mean EXACTLY, the same amount – £23,083.

    Now I used to be a bookmaker in a past life and have some understanding of odds. And, believe me, the odds of six out of WHOLE batch of 646 having exactly the same second home costs is the same as Brown winning the next election on a free vote. The odds of SIX from the last page having EXACTLY the same costs is astronomic.

    Lying, cheating bastards sums it up.

  11. 17
    Paddles says:

    My MP is Jeremy Corbyn. He’s about the cheapest of the lot.

    This leaves me with a huge dilemma; either vote against him in the next election and risk getting an representative who will be happy to rip me off for more more cash each year BUT is bound to ask a few more questions pertinent to my life and won’t spend his/her whole time in parliament worrying about foriegn affairs and human rights in countries I will never bother going on holiday to.

    Actually, to be honest, it won’t be that much of a dilemma…..

    • 42
      Plato says:

      I went to a meeting with JC the other day and I was frankly pretty impressed at how straight up he was.

      I’d stick with him even if he is a bit of a loon. At least he has priniciples.

      • 48
        Paddles says:

        JC? As in “JC is a friend of mine, he plays goal for Palestine”?

      • 73
        Plato says:

        Well I did say a loon, but at least he appeared honest!

      • 243
        Anonymous says:

        In terms of personal ethics Corbyn is in a class of his own. The only other MP who came close was Dave Nellist. If you want someone who’s honest you have to put up with them playing outside left for the other side.

        We shouldn’t be faced with this dilemma. Will Dave make it obligatory for Tory MPs to be honest, or is that asking too much?

  12. 18
    Anonymous says:

    Why does it cost The Rt Hon G Brown MP PM £17,073 to stay away from his main home, when he has a grace and favour home at 10 Downing Street, at our expense already?

  13. 20
    Anonymous says:

    Blair still at the trough.

  14. 21
    Weybridgeman says:

    Perhaps my 2 local MPs Philip Hammond and Ian Taylor would like to explain the £23,075 and £23,083 for staying away from home allowance when a 1st Class season from Weybridge and Walton on Thames is £4,000 and trains run until at least 1am in the morning from Waterloo? Even a taxi home from Westminster is at worst £75……..less if you pre-book it. This allowance would theoretically cover 307 such trips each! Even less if they shared the ride……..

    • 60
      Pickled Egg says:

      If your main place of work is in Weybridge and your work requires you to work in London, it is not unreasonable to have overnight accomodation paid for by expenses.

      However, they MUST be expenses.

      • 286
        Jenny Gould says:

        Actually the last train to Egham is at 23:35. I don’t know where Philip Hammond lives, though the phone number listed is localish to me . But I showed it was possible to get back home after the whole of the debate on the third runway
        Maybe he commutes by helicopter? !I also like the way he skillfully got his expenses within £8 of the total allowed.

    • 205
      Anonymous says:

      Ask them yourself instead of commenting on a forum!

  15. 22
    MisterE says:

    Why the fuck has Gordon Brown claimed £17k for staying away from home?!

  16. 23
    Praguetory says:

    The communications allowance was voted in at £10k per annum, so all the MPs who claimed more than that (and there’s lots of them) need to start digging into the pockets.

    • 210
      Anonymous says:

      Actually it increases every financial year by the RPI figure as at the preceding New Years Eve.

  17. 30
    Sniper says:

    Sinn Fein can claim because of the lying Hoon Blair. It was part of his “hand of history” up the public’s arse for the Good Friday agreement. You know, the one that has led to religious apartheid in Ulster, gangsterism as “mainstream” politics and still some more dead soldiers. Still a small price to pay for having him walk among us, eh? There is nothing, absolutely fucking nothing, that the Hoon Blair has not fucked us over with. And some Hoons think he was good! Un-fucking-believable.

  18. 31
    geekparent says:

    So £23,083 is the maximum amount for “staying away from main home”.

    Clare Ward – Watford. 20mins on the train to Euston, £13 per day return by Oyster. I pay it – so can she.

    • 33
      Home Office Central Database says:

      Please confirm your postcode and house number….

    • 49
      Minekiller says:

      Maybe it would be better value to pay them all 23,083 to stay at home and not do any more fucking damage

      • 167
        Anonymous says:

        I see Mr David Mundell has been claiming office costs of £28,618 ie way above the average of about£17-1800.

        Wonder why. I suppose this ought to be supressed and we ought to to turn a blind eye. Its for ” sake of the union” you know.

  19. 32
    Prime Minister Gordon Brown says:

    Hee Hee! Nobody is going to notice that I’ve hidden the cost of my nightly gay porno movies habit under Centrally Purchased Stationery.

    Tra Laa

  20. 37
    Solid says:

    nyone short of work to do and fancy exporting all this data into an Excel spreadsheet so we can sort by descending trougher totals and stuffs?

    • 54
      Minekiller says:

      several million are short of work and counting, sadly owing to the eduycashun system under Nulabia, most probably think a spread sheet is what single mothers put on state paid for baby beds in state paid for flats.

  21. 38
    Harman_Pride says:

    Guido has been trying to censor me because he’s scared that I will expose the lies of the Right. You hypocrite! You claim to be a “Libertarian” but you don’t want any opposing views on this website. I will e-mail Derek Draper so that he can expose you on Labourlist again, thus demolishing any credibility you still have.

    • 47
      Sime says:

      Ooh look troll!

    • 52

      Thanks Harman. If you are being censored, why are you here? Idiot.

      • 69
        Ambrose Silk II says:

        It’s your rubbish algorithm thingy isn’t it?

        Tra laa!

      • 72
        Sunbronzed Hulk says:

        It’s your rubbish algorithm thingy isn’t it?

        Tra laa!

      • 179
        Anonymous says:

        “I will e-mail Derek Draper so that he can expose you on Labourlist again” – is this some kind of joke? Shades of the ‘Black Knight’ here…

        What the hell does ‘Harman_Pride’ mean anyhow? – seems like some sexual orientation to me.

      • 255
        Ray Williams says:

        Can we have the political parties on the web page too and maybe some analysis on averages etc (easily done in MS Excel)?

        I’m curious as to who is the greediest party….

    • 58
      Minekiller says:

      “Exposed on Labourlist” ….that is an oxymoron is it not?

    • 61
      Pickled Egg says:

      You know you really could do more to make yourself prettier.

      • 79
        Plato says:

        I see Mr Draper has been excised from Woman’s Hour. I even listened twice just in case I’d missed him.

        hhohoh.

        I hear from OH that Jenni Murray also told him to shut up.

        Bless.

    • 91
      no longer anonymous says:

      “I will e-mail Derek Draper so that he can expose you on Labourlist again, thus demolishing any credibility you still have.”

      That’s really made my day!

    • 204
      Simon Cowell says:

      Harman Pride sounds like some grim ritual where you end up with a bloody bottom.

  22. 44
    Cardinal del Monte says:

    I would surmise that Gordon Brown’s main home is 10 Downing Street, and that the cost of staying away from home represents trips to his house in Scotland.

    • 66
      MisterE says:

      But 10 Downing Street isn’t *his* home – it’s a grace and favour home, so incurs no cost to him… unless, of course, the fucker’s gone and re-mortgaged it! Wouldn’t put that past him at all!!

      His constituency home is his only home, and so shouldn’t be eligible for the Additional Costs Allowance…

    • 216
      Anonymous says:

      Well to be fair I suppose it would be acceptable for him to be driven up there every so often. Whether that’s worth 17K is debatable though.

  23. 46
    Anonymous says:

    It doesn’t exactly encourage confidence in the figures when they list:

    Ancram,
    Earl of, Rt Hon
    Michael

    He might be called Michael Ancram (from his courtesy title) but he’s been the Marquess of Lothian since the death of his father in 2004.

  24. 50
    Anonymous says:

    Harman caught at it again!

    Can’t she get enough?

    Isn’t she claiming large enough assets already?

    How can such graphic evidence be ignored.

    Now did the cover up happen?

    Did she put on a long dark raincoat?

    She needs too and perhaps a bag over her face as well might help!

    It’s not the first time she’s been caught fiddling with her assets!

    And the public would be in total shock and horror to see her involved in such scenes!

    Very amature stuff.

    Not even good enough for readers wives!

  25. 51

    Rudi Vis, Labour, Finchley: Way up at the top end:

    £23,083 the max
    £21,328 cost of running his office
    £88,910 staff
    £2,104 stationery
    £4,630 postage
    £1,378 IT
    £9,390 Comms allowance.

    • 223
      Anonymous says:

      Well a Labour win there was a surprise, so no surprise if it goes Tory next time.

  26. 55
    Ctesibius says:

    Nick Robinson this moning inadvertently published an allegation by ‘friends’ of the Home Secretary, which actually makes it clear that she made her expenses claims without actually knowning which residence she was using WAS her primary residence. Let’s see if he follows up a story LITERALLY handed to him on a plate. Here’s what I posted on his blog:

    Nick,

    As I pointed out to you this morning, you have just been handed a story which is much bigger than the Home Secretary’s phoney claim for porn on her husband’s behalf. The Home Secretary’s ‘friends’ appear to have inadvertently confirmed that she has been making fraudulent claims over which is her ‘prime residence’. Why are you suppressing this story, which contradicts everything she and her defenders have said?

    Let me explain.

    The big hoo-ha about Jackie Smith has been that she has claimed a large sum in expenses for the use of her home in her constituency, where here husband and children live. She has repeatedly insisted that because she spends most of her time living at her sister’s address in London, her sister’s house is her primary residence and the house in her constituency is therefore her ’second residence’, so she can make the claim. Fair enough.

    Now, in the opening part of your story this morning, you say: “The irony is that only last week she told friends that she expected to be cleared in the inquiry into the expense claims for her second home. The home secretary has been poring over her home, constituency and office diary to plot where she had spent each night in the past year.”

    Now, you must have heard this from her ‘friends’ (more than one)? Or at any rate by some means which is presumably confidential this information imparted by her ‘friends’ reached your ears. Some of these expenses for her ’second home’ were submitted years ago, and we all know that such a claim can only be lawful if she KNEW she had spend the majority of her time there. Yet you say that LAST WEEK her ‘friends’ were saying that she ‘has been poring over her … diary to plot where she had spent each night in the past year’. In other words, her ‘friends’ have told you that until last week she didn’t know whether her claim that the house in London was her prime residence was true.

    That sounds very like fraud to me. It also sounds like all the assertions by her, the Prime Minister and others, that her claim was ‘within the rules’ are also completely wrong.

    Now, I’ve made comments here in the past because I think you allow yoirself to be influenced so that you do not write anything which is too critical of the Government. It appears that in this you have been given a piece of information which demonstrates that she has lied in order to maximise her expenses, but you have chosen to look at this piece of information only to ameliorate the embarrassment to the Home Secretary of her husband’s porn habit.

    Will you now investigate, with these ‘friends’, exactly what their revelation that she has not looked at her diaries before to where she lives before she makes her expenses claim actually means for her? I know that she, and the Labour Party, may not like you doing that, and I know that it may get a bit icy for you in the canteen, as her sister works at the BBC. Unfortunately for her, and possibly for you also if you didn’t mean to, you have this morning published the ’smoking gun’ which shows her to have made fraudulent expense claims.

    • 85
      Plato says:

      *gets popcorn* well spotted Sir.

      • 169
        Anonymous says:

        Every day, when she leaves either the house in Redditch or her sister’s address, she would be accompanied by one or more armed police protection officers, just like every other Home Secretary before her, and the police officer would also take her home at night, wherever home might be. For obvious reasons, it is all carefully recorded in the individual officer’s official Diary and elsewhere. It would be very easy to look back over the past year, grab a sheet of paper, write down two column headings, one for London, one for Redditch and just fucking count. Why isn’t it done? What a silly question.

      • 228
        Anonymous says:

        What happens if they count 180 days in both homes and 5 days wanking in a hotel? Interesting

  27. 56
    Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

    My MP, Kevan Jones (Labour, Durham North) has claimed the maximum for ’staying away from main home’ (of course) but its his office and staff costs that made me snort coffee down my shirt.

    His office is in the ex mining village of Sacriston, County Durham. This must be one of the lowest wage areas in the country and yet he still managed to spend over £90k on ’staff’. How??

    Mr Jones is very keen on keeping MPs expenses secret. You know, for security and that

    • 215
      Anonymous says:

      Erm, MPs have staff in Westminster you know

      • 226
        Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

        I am well aware of that – my point is that the constituency element of his staff bill should be one of the lowest in the country. Which makes his high overall figure difficult to explain.

      • 262

        Graduates called Tarquin, financed by Mummy and Daddy who work for the BBC and live in Islington, you mean?

        Piss off with that shite

  28. 59
    Plato says:

    I see Hoon is a £23, 083 Hoon.

    • 67
      Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

      The sum of £23,083 should be known as a ‘Hoon’

      • 130
        Oxford English bloke says:

        The sum of £23,083 shall now known as a ‘Hoon’

        The activity of masturbating to adult entertainment paid for by someone else will be referred to as a Jacqui wackie.

      • 152
        Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

        Or indeed ‘Jacquing Off’

      • 197
        Unhelpful Bitch in French Sandwich Shop 2010 says:

        That will be 1 hoon then si vous plait monsieur.

  29. 64
    Mertonian says:

    Of the MPs who claimed over £100,000 in staffing expenses, those who aren’t ministers or the Leader of the Opposition are:

    Harry Cohen Lab
    Lynne Jones Lab
    Ann Keen Lab
    Khalid Mahmood Lab
    Judy Mallaber Lab
    Bob Neill Con
    Stephen Pound Lab
    Clare Short Ind/Lab
    Peter Tapsell Con
    Ian Taylor Con
    Bill Wiggin Con
    Michael Wills Lab
    Mike Wood Lab

    I wonder what they do with it all?

    … and then there’s Philip Hollobone (Con, Kettering) on £400.

    • 92
      Plato says:

      £100k!!!!!!

      Apart from being infamous for squeezing the taxpayer til it squeaked – what have these people ever stood up for to generate such an enormous workload???

      • 104
        Mertonian says:

        I’d be happy to give Peter Tapsell a hundred grand to spend on something useful like court dress, but as for the others…

    • 188
      Anonymous says:

      Dear Phil,hasn’t got a clue has he?

      Imagine how much better his retirement would be if he fleeced us for more.

  30. 65

    Dear xxxxxxxx

    I notice that Her Majesty’s Government has recently published your expenses as my MP.

    After much scrutiny, I notice that you have grabbed £xxxxx from my wallet for “the cost of staying away from your main home”. You fat idle Hoon! You only live xx miles from fucking Parliament! I know deaf, dumb and blind people who commute further than that every day on filthy lice ridden trains whilst dodging hooded knife wielding scrotes! As you are away so often and I’m paying for it, I am going to seduce your wife and daughters. Up their arses. With a handful of sand.

    I also notice that you spend £xxxx of my hard earned money on “staff”. Considering I hear from you once every four years, might I ask as to exactly what I am paying them for? I realise there is a good chance they are your nephew or cousin but nevertheless, they could get a job washing cars or mopping up vomit in McDonalds if they want to spend their gap year “doing” Asia to “find themselves”.

    Your Comms allowance is also £xxxxx. What the fuck? Have you launched your own satellite? Why the hell do need that much money to tell me what I can already read about you on a piece of used bog paper?

    In total, you cost me £xxxxxx a bastard year. Enough to pay off my mortgage. You BASTARD.

    So. As you are my employee and all your “staff” are my employees, and you are spending all my fucking money, I am coming round to “quantatively ease” your fingers off my fucking wallet with a sledgehammer.

    Love and kisses

    Old Holborn

    • 76

      Dear Old Holborn,

      I hope you realise that in the current War on Terror, any abusive correspondence or threats of violence made against Government ministers will be taken very seriously and may mean your e-mail and Internet usage is monitored in the future.

      • 83
        Minekiller says:

        Having fought terrorists for the UK, I’d just like to inform you, Harman-Pride you sniveling little Nazi, that the point of any War on Terror is so that we can maintain our freedoms, such as free speech and assembly (even if that assembly is in cyberspace).

        If people wish to express a wish to do violence to Uk government ministers it is because of their genuine anger and frustration at said government minsters criminality, lies, incompetence, war mongering and treachery to the electorate of the country. Got that?

        Your threats are pathetic. A Government that criminalises its people, criminalises itself and relinquishes its authority.

        Go make your pathetic threats elsewhere.

      • 86

        I intend to hang the Hoons from lamp posts with piano wire and petrol, disembowel them, feed the remains to pigs and send the cleaning bill to their relatives. Is that abusive enough?

        My Email is oldhoborn@gmail.com. They know who I am.

      • 94
        Plato says:

        I see you have changed your name from Labourlist.org to Labour.org

        Dear me – hope you aren’t applying for a job at M15.

      • 96
        The Man says:

        Dear Harman_Pride,

        I do hope you realise that as a woman your place is in the home and not on the internet.

      • 156
        Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

        Ms Harman – some long words in your post for a pretty little thing like you.

        Shouldn’t you be at home getting Jack’s dinner ready?

      • 161
        Ted's Shed says:

        Dear Harman pride – thank you again for being a comedy genius.

      • 201
        Man in the Street says:

        You really can fuck off.

    • 77
      Minekiller says:

      Brilliant, a slightly amended (no sand up the arse bit) version is en route to my MP!!!!!

      • 89
        Auntie Climax says:

        Was it lonely and yet crowded, at sea?

      • 273
        Minekiller says:

        Auntie Climax post 89 (no balls to leave reply option)

        Msg. Lonely? perhaps you’ll feel at home meathooked and swinging from lamp posts with your criminal NuLabour creed, which is the fate you deserve.

    • 98
      Sir Percy Sillitoe says:

      Be on notice you are breaking the law.

  31. 70
    William says:

    1) Look at Spelman’s travel expenses – she is claiming for more than the cost of a standard annual season ticket to her constituency, PLUS £££ for car travel, PLUS spouse journeys at over £100 a go on average for a journey which costs just over £30 for a standard fare! (London > Solihull constituency)

    2) Ed Balls is claiming £2,000 for ‘family’ journeys. Yvette Cooper also claiming just over £2,000. £4,000 for the Balls family to go return from Westminster > constituency at weekends.

    3) Julie Kirkbride is claiming £1,392 in travel for her spouse… who is also an MP (Andrew McKay)!!! He in turn is claiming £408 for her travel.

  32. 74
    Bob Jones says:

    To put this in a context that the voters will understand – every year, their MP wins 5 numbers on the lottery and its the voters money!

    I know that office costs include staff costs, but considering that most researchers are being paid a pitance because they also hope to be able to join the MP gravy train one day – I would pay them separately – from income support!

    • 277
      Gigits says:

      5 numbers on the Lotto is usually about £1500. These bastards have got 5 + the bonus ball!

  33. 78
    Harman's got no pride left says:

    Where’s Galloway pride? Cracking one off at our expense probably.
    A complete bunch of onanists = Labour!

    Hoon’s the lot of them!

    Dolly boys up late today I see. too busy filling in their expense vouchers?

    • 93
      Auntie Climax says:

      Guidorc’s gone all paranoid techno since his telly flop/belly flop.

      Sigh!

  34. 80
    Nic Conner says:

    Why is Brown taken £17,073 of us the tax payers for “Cost of staying
    away from main home” I do believe we paying for a London flat and his constituency home. Is downing street and chequers not is not enuth for him?

  35. 81
    denverthen says:

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iSICCdVNHB8/SdDaNAk5xLI/AAAAAAAAACY/S_i0zmmB6EM/s1600-h/blairexpense.JPG

    Snapshot of Bliar’s. Column 7 (staff cover) is interesting. Maybe he paid it to G. Brown – you know, for being a ’supply prime minister’.

  36. 82
    Old Street says:

    Dominic Grieve my mp didnt trough that much. Seemed like a good bloke when i met him.

    too posh to be high profile tory though.

  37. 87
    bob says:

    nice to know that useless bitch linda riordan has her nose well stuffed in the trough

    whilst halifax goes down the pan, the is stuffing her pockets, whilst crying foul at the whole HBOS debarcle

    thieving fucking bitch..!

  38. 90

    The Conservatives were well known for their sleaze in the Major years – compared with Neil Hamilton and Jonathan Aitken and Jeffrey Archer, is this really the best you can dig up?

    Jacqui Smith didn’t know about this – can she really be held accountable for everything her husband did?

    Everyone slips up now and then. What really matters is not how MPs conduct every detail of their private lives, but how they run the country.

    The public is more interested in delivery than gossip. For example, new data shows that the NHS has met its target to treat patients within a maximum of 18 weeks from referral by their GP – an achievement which was unimaginable 12 years ago.

    In 1997, Labour inherited an NHS ignored and starved of funds. The investment and reform since then has built towards an NHS we can all be proud of and made a real difference to the lives of people across the country.

    • 100
      The Man says:

      Harman_Pride, how much would you charge for a quickie behind the bins at Sainsbury’s?

      • 135
        Anonymous says:

        Probably FoC, mate. Doing her a favour.

      • 256
        Ted Bundy says:

        Dear Harman_Pride

        It is completely accepted that it was not Jacqui Smith who was watching and wanking herself silly over the adult channels and the pay per view porn films. That was her sexually depraved husband and political researcher Richard Timney. Obviously Jacqui has been unable to fulfil his sexual needs and perverted desires.

        However it was Jacqui Smith who claimed for the above on her expenses which she signed for and submitted. As a result of this she is now the laughing stock of the world. A politician who lives away from home and fiddles her expenses while her husband jerks himself off over hardcore pornography paid for by the taxpayer. Did anybody envisage back in 1997 that a Labour Government would end up in this state of decay and squalor?
        Lets just hope for Jacqui Smiths sake that their are no further revelations coming in the Redditch Wankergate scandal, we can only guess at the internet activity of dear old Timney the logs of which will be with Virgin Media kept as a result of changes in the law made by his wife’s Government. Maybe Ms Smith ought to get someone to have a discreet look before its splashed all over next weeks Daily Express.

        Labour Governments = taxpayer founded pornography

    • 103

      Try telling that to the victims of Staffordshire trust.

    • 108
      Winston Smith says:

      Nobody believes your data anymore you stupid fucking Hoon.

    • 110
    • 115

      I hope face cancer gets you in 17 weeks

    • 118
      One-eyed snotgobbler says:

      She fucking does know about her second home scam though.

      Thieving whore.

    • 124
      vlad the pimp says:

      All that energy devoted to rigging statistics. All that money devoted to employing bed-wetters, box-tickers and make-weights in marginal constituencies. Meanwhile the economy has been destroyed and Brown is reduced to literally printing money.

      Oh, but you banned fox-hunting.

      The priorities of the fifth form.

    • 126
    • 127
      bofl says:

      YOU SIR OR MADAM ARE A TWAT!

      WE PAY FOR THE NHS!

      SO IS IT TOO MUCH TO ASK THEM TO DO THEIR JOBS?
      TO STOP BEING DIRTY BASTARDS AND KILLING THOUSANDS EACH YEAR?

      jacqui smith is a fraudulent thief…….so are many of the others.

      now go and sit on the naughty step before derek comes back and starts shouting
      ‘arbeit macht frei’.

    • 132
      Minekiller says:

      Well Harpie-Pride, I’ll give you one thing, at least you have a skin like an elephant. The whole edifice is crumbling around you – and yet, like a true LieBore troll reach for the old tractor production statistics. Hilarious.

      • 137
        Auntie Climax says:

        You were all alone in your bunk were you.
        Were they horrid to you?

      • 151

        We’ve been behind in the polls before and bounced back every time.

        Labour has faced huge problems in our 12 years in power. The fuel crisis, foot and mouth, 9/11, the Iraq war, the 7/7 terrorist attacks, and the banking crisis.

        In each case, Labour has risen to the challenge and proved that we alone can take Britain forward and build a fairer, more prosperous country. We are not afraid to take the long-term decisions needed to ensure a better future for our children.

        This poll shows that if the economy recovers, we can still win the next election.

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/17/labour-general-election-poll

        Michael White points out that John Major’s government managed a surprise win in a similar situation: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/mar/20/michael-white-can-labour-win

        By opposing Labour’s fiscal stimulus, the Conservatives have set themselves against providing real help now for families and businesses. They are committed not just to spending less in a time of need but also to spend less in the future. By doing nothing, they would deepen the downturn and delay the recovery, just as they did in the recessions of the 1980s and 1990s. They would make Britain weaker not stronger for the future.

    • 165
      The Inquisition says:

      Keep it up, this is their standard and very boring modus operandi.
      They themselves will tire of repeating their sexist, racist, homophobic nonsense.
      In the meantime silent observers can be reminded of the bizarre attitudes and agenda the Conservatives have to pander to for electoral gain.
      Conservatives stand for very little, now officially they have no philosophy or purpose. Aprt from striving for personal gain.

      Two jobs, three jobs, four jobs, it’s never enough for Conservatives

      Financial misconduct = Conservatives

      • 219
        Plato says:

        *the Guiness Book of World Records – Most Twathead Post of 2009.

      • 235
        Gordon Warwick-Hunt says:

        Since when has having a job been a bad thing, you muppet?

        I would much rather an MP came from a background where he/she had actually had to, you know, earn a living.

        Kevan Jones, my own (Labour) MP’s CV reads like this: Politics graduate, National Union of Students administrator, TUC adminstrator, Labour MP.

        In other words, this forty-odd year old man has never had a productive job in his entire life.

        Now as an MP he is in Hog’s Heaven. Always one of the top expense claimants and very keen to keep MPs financial details a secret from the people who pick up the bill – us.

      • 237
        The Inquisition says:

        Lots of the few Conservative MPs that there are have not done a ‘real job’, they’ve followed the familiar staff, adviser route.

        But either way, one job at a time now, one job at a time.
        Do the job you’re paid for.
        If you have enough time for a second third or fourth job, volunteer it, or pay back your Parliamentary salary, allowances and expenses, at least.
        Now, who bank rolls William Hague’s ‘office’?

        Financial misconduct = Conservatives

      • 239
        Gooey Blob says:

        Porn on expenses = Labour.

      • 287
        Anonymous says:

        They’re talking to each other again–piss off to draperlist and bore each other to death over there you clowns.

        We need a compilation of “Dollys” greatest hits–the most smug trolling shite yet produced by Man. To be broadcast after ZaNus GE wipeout followed by release on KTEL–”Now that’s what I call Smug Bullshite.”

    • 177
      Anonymous says:

      what a wanker

    • 236
      labourwipeout says:

      The point about Aitken and Archer was they were in fact punished, by being convicted and sent to Jail. Hamilton was also punished though not as severley. This lot however do not even receive a mild telling off. No one is denying the abuses of the last tory administration, the difference was it was dealt with and they went into the political wilderness for years. This lot are getting away with it and thats what is causing the anger and frustration. You dont see that do you. Fool.

    • 238
      The big D says:

      Deaths as well. Don’t forget Salford had the novel Nu Labour idea of culling some patients so that they could make the figures. Worth every penny of the increased NHS costs ( and patients lives ) to get the figures correct.

  39. 98
    pp says:

    Blimey – blair tops the charts for ’staff cover and other costs’.

    Meanwhile Tom Brake gave almost 2,000 worth of central staionary back?!?! Whats the story there?

  40. 101

    Disgusting troughers = NuLabour

  41. 102
    Andy says:

    Can somebody sum all of the columns up and put on here?

    Then I can divide it by my increasing blood pressure…

  42. 105
    JR says:

    At the bottom of each page it invites us to look at the explanatory note ‘for deatils of budgetary flexibilities’.

    I rather suspect that all we need do is look in the newspapers for that.

  43. 106
    bob says:

    OT..on sky now, obama is suck a wanker….one moment he is saying no to protectionism, now he is saying he is gonna basicaly bail out the US car industry,

    did the US only elect him because he was black ?????, he talks like the words are read to him via an ear piece ???
    tripping over words all over the place

    FUCK OFF OBAMA

    • 112

      Do you realise how racist you sound? Typical of the Nasty Party.

      Meanwhile, Labour has:

      Established the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to act as a strong, independent champion to tackle discrimination and promote equality for all.

      Widened and strengthened the Race Relations Act to include a positive duty on public bodies to promote good race relations and legislated for aggravated sentences for racially motivated crimes.

      Through the introduction of civil partnerships, Labour has for the first time given legal recognition to same-sex partners. Gay couples now have the same inheritance, pension and next-of-kin rights as married couples.

      • 119
        Winston Smith says:

        “Widened and strengthened the Race Relations Act to include a positive duty on public bodies to promote good race relations and legislated for aggravated sentences for racially motivated crimes.”

        Did that actually involve any real action at all? Cos it reads like a bunch of bull.

        Labour = Fake jobs for Labour voters

      • 122
        vlad the pimp says:

        Hi Galloway,

        You forgot Labours main achievements. Bankrupt the entire country. Alienated the entire Muslim world with a fucking pointless war in Iraq.

        Oh and banned fox-hunting.

        Nice set of priorities you jackasses have.

      • 131
        Unsworth says:

        So?

        Of what benefit is that to the population?

        Cui Bono?

      • 135
        Minekiller says:

        Absolute bollocks, the lot of it. Non-Job creation scheme for unemployable lefties.

      • 141
        bofl says:

        labour-widening the circles of their friends……..

        who really gives a toss (er jacquis old man)?

        the country is being bankrupted before our eyes and you keep postimg this bollocks!

      • 181
        Cato says:

        Do you realise what a twat you sound?

      • 195
        YouDontKnowWhatPrideIs says:

        and it does fuck all to stop discrimination of disabled people

        EHRC is real trouble as everybody’s resigning from i9t

        wanker

      • 209
        Anon. says:

        Fuck off!

      • 221

        It might have been nicer had they paid any attention whatsoever to the economy over the last 12 years rather than appeasing nasty little leftie shits like you, though.

      • 240
        labourwipeout says:

        and the country is bankrupt , nice one.

    • 116
      vlad the pimp says:

      Fucking great. That’ll bankrupt the yanks. Building massive cars that nobody wants to buy and meeting the insane pay demands of the auto-workers. They’re about to go all 1960/70’s Britain.

      Ha ha. Fuck ‘em. Can only be good for the pound. Although Brown will probably use the excuse to print even more fucking money to keep the pound completely in the shitter on a par with the USD. Because he is a fucking lunatic.

  44. 114
    Astro Turfer says:

    Perhaps this is being over played?
    Everything is so negative.
    The voter doesn’t warm to it any more.
    You’ve got tp have hope and optimism.
    Still it is easy though, probably all daily mail readers can manage.

    • 274
      The big D says:

      You are right. Hope and optimism are the right words. Hope that the number of labour MPs in the HOC after the next election is less than the number of fingers on one hand, and optimism that the figure is constant for the next 100 years or so.

  45. 121
    Tricky Dicky says:

    The English are far too complacent! We have a Home Secretary who is a thieving, disgusting joke! We have a Labour Employment Minister who is a lying, thieving, disgusting joke! We have Dawn Butler, who is another thieving Minister and a joke! We have a self appointed Prime Minister who is a disgusting joke! We should march on Westminster and barricade the place, until that stinking sewer is dissolved and we can have a General Election to get rid of the porcine swine and demand probity and patriotism in future from the place which is supposed to represent US the people (the ones the trough swillers have forgotten about, the poor sods who have to pay all the bills for bloated state and trough swillers in what passes for Parliament these days)!

    • 142
      Minekiller says:

      Yes, but that’s the problem – they are English and would rather just have a nice cup of tea. That is also why they are so easily shafted by this criminal gang posing as a government.

    • 170

      Try it – you will quite rightly be arrested and detained under anti-terror laws.

      It you want to remove an MP that’s what elections are for.

      • 176
        Tricky Dicky says:

        So you don’t believe in People Power – that our elected representatives were elected to represent us and that when they are no longer fulfilling that function, we the sovereign people do not have the right to get rid of them? It is all about numbers. Five people turn up to protest and they are arrested. Five million turn up to protest and it is curtains for the charlatans currently pretending to be the government of this once great country!

        This country has been stuffed by ZaNuLabour who are a bunch of traitors who hate the English in any case – and by God that must be clear to all by now!

      • 187

        Five million protesters won’t succeed. The police have riot gear and shields, and will use other means if necessary to preserve peace and order on Britain’s streets. As Churchill said, we will never give in to force.

        I hope you realise that conspiracy to overthrow the Government is breaking the law.

      • 198
        YouDontKnowWhatPrideIs says:

        pretending to be serious should also be against the law – idiot pride

      • 212
        Anon. says:

        Hoon.

      • 214
        Winston Smith says:

        5 million and riot police would count for fuck all.

      • 230
        Winston Smith II says:

        Come the revolution i know exactly who the people would want to get first. The snivelling, grovelling apologists for the regime.

      • 241

        “quite rightly be arrested and detained under anti-terror laws.”

        That pretty much sums up the Neues Arbeit attitude – ‘anti-terror’ laws aimed at the majority of the populace who now despise the Government more as each day passes.

        I’ll be down on Wednesday, and the first of Jackboot’s blue uniformed troops who gets in my face is going down, and down hard. We will take Westminster, and we will get rid of this shower of shit that poses as a government.

        Labour Pride my arse – I learnt my Labour politics at my grandad’s knee, and these Hoons aren’t Labour.

      • 242
        labourwipeout says:

        give us one then if you think you are hard enough !

      • 279
        mister ed says:

        we’d get away with it if we grew beards and all dressed like Islamic Jihadists.

        in the face of that , british cops tend to run away. (see riots near Israeli embassy)

      • 281
        Anonymous says:

        ….note “under anti terror laws”, the jacquing off hoons actually believe this Nazi regime has got it right – Lord help us.

  46. 123
    Unsworth says:

    Derek Wyatt (Lab), Sittingbourne, just about one hour from Victoria Station. Many of his constituents commute daily on the poxy North Kent line, and he claims this magical £23,083 too. Why? Staying away from main home? I don’t think so.

    ‘Staffing costs’ at £91,000 p.a.? I don’t think so.

    ‘Office running costs’ at £18,500 p.a.? Hardly likely given the location.

    Let’s see real signed off accounts, not these works of light fiction. And let’s also see their diaries.

  47. 139
    Anonymous says:

    I have just seen Brown on Sky News. His comment on Smith and her fraudulent expeses claim was that it was a “Personal Affair”.

    Unbelievable!!!The Home Secretary, one of the most senior posts in HM Government, is caught claiming PUBLIC MONEY for pornographic purposes and our “Dear Leader” tells us to ignore it and leave the poor woman alone.

    Is this how British politics is conducted in 2009? Ye Gods! Why do us “little people” bother paying tax?

    Brown, call an election you coward.

    • 263
      Tricky Dicky says:

      Yes – it makes you wonder what on earth has happened to Brown’s Moral Compost doesn’t it? I wonder where he has buried it. I guess the problem is that he would have to sack half his Cabinet if he got rid of Two Homes, Two Home Movies Jackboot. So he should call an election now! We need rid of this whole sorry mess of a rubbish bunch of traitors called Government.

  48. 140
    Nosebag says:

    What you chaps do not understand when trying to analyse the logic of claiming the £23087 on ‘cost of extra accomodation’ is that this expense allowance is a form of legitimised theft from the public purse.

    When will you understand that normal business practice and average standard of morality/integrity does not apply to politicians. They are gentically corrupt and Westminster itself is intitutionally corrupt. But we are not supposed to notice.

  49. 144
    Old Street says:

    some mps claim maximum staff expenses in cash and then just do all the work themselves anyway.

    is this right?

  50. 147
    Anonymous says:

    heres another “Jacqui Joke”:

    http://www.london-hotels.co.uk/news/jacqui-smith-offered-new-post.htm

    She really does need to go

  51. 148
    Tory Dan says:

    Nice to see my MP has claimed the magical £23,083 sum, his staffing costs are quite high but on the other end of things office costs are low and he’s quite a good chap so he’s safe for now.

  52. 153
    question says:

    Gordon Brown claimed £8.99 for a butt-plug. Is he entitled to do that or is he just ripping off the taxpayer?

  53. 154
    dorzey says:

    Total Expense Claim = £86,781,205

    Avg. Expense Claim = £ 134,544.50

  54. 155
  55. 158

    Any expense claim made at the exact maximum entitlement suggests that such MP is either:

    (1) generously subsidising the taxpayer by funding otherwise legitimate claims from his or her own pocket, or

    alternatively (surely not, tsk tsk)

    (2) inflating the genuine disbursements so as fully to to clean out the allowance locker.

    My guess is that (2) camp is somewhat more popular than the (1).

  56. 160
    Ashamed Tory says:

    I see Rosindell, that thick never-had-a-proper-job-in-his-life MP for Romford, has his snouts in the trough (again!)

    • 206

      On the subject of Rosindell, I see his nearest Con MP Brokenshire (Hornchurch), claimed only £386.00

      Work that out.

      How do you find out if they allegedly live in the constituency?

  57. 161
    backwoodsman says:

    HHhhhhhhhhHow the fuck does barbera follett get to spend £20,000 on staying away from her main home – sounds ficticious to me !

    • 225
      Rich Socialists Working 4 U says:

      Well her husband is broke. I mean he’s only sold about 100 million books….

  58. 163
    Andrew F says:

    Don’t really give a shit about expenses, but I do wonder how the hell Brown managed to claim a living away from home allowance.

  59. 166

    The Tories’ lead is “soft”, a new poll reveals.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/17/labour-general-election-poll

    I just wanted to canvas opinion on this site – who would consider returning to Labour if the economy improves enough by next May?

    • 172
      Anthony Blanche says:

      Also the Conservative leadership is soft.

      Tra laa!

    • 173

      Cameron and his Old Etonian clique are worried. They know that most opposition parties have historically polled 50% before regaining power.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/mar/20/michael-white-can-labour-win

      Michael White still thinks we can win and so do I.

      • 182

        We’ve been behind in the polls before and bounced back every time.

        Labour has faced huge problems in our 12 years in power. The fuel crisis, foot and mouth, 9/11, the Iraq war, the 7/7 terrorist attacks, and the banking crisis. In each case we were written off but we weathered the storm and recovered.

        As Winston Churchill said, “Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never–in nothing, great or small, large or petty–never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.”

      • 189
        Plato says:

        Well since he received 500+ negative comments on his Dan Hannan ad hom attack, I suspect Sir Michael is in fact a dick-head

      • 193
        vlad the pimp says:

        As Labour would say – Never face the the truth. Never. Never, ever. In matters great or small. Lie, lie, lie and lie again. In the face of over-whelming truth. Lie. And lie again. And lie often.

      • 200
        Anthony Blanche says:

        There are many people who have grave misgivings in this crisis, they are scared and anxious.
        However they know that the mess the UK is in is because of free market ideology running rough shod over the needs of the people.
        The Conservaitve Party is still infiltrated by its own radical free market ideologues, Eurosceptics and ‘anti immigration’ groupings as well as dirty money support.
        People know we can’t risk that nonsense any more.
        Although the Conservatives try to cloak or hide their true intent, their Achilles heel is their dim witted followers who will demand bits of red meat and blue water and all the other clap trap notions they love. When they show or we expose their true face, they’ll be sunk, again.

        Tra laa!

      • 208
        vlad the pimp says:

        Oh Labour can win. I don’t doubt it. But it won’t be because of their economic record. Nor their handling of the unnecessary war on Iraq.

        It will be the BBC wot don it. A full-on campaign of misinformation, lies, more lies, rigged figures, denial of platform to the Torys, full-on propaganda blitz. Any time public opinion against the financial destruction of the UK turns against the government then Fred Goodwin and Andy Hornby will wheeled out to the ‘court of public opinion’ and given the full Emmanuel Goldstein treatment. The better to help us all in understanding who the government wants us to blame.

        Profoundly depressing even to think about such an awful outcome. We must all work tirelessly to ensure it does not happen.

      • 221
        vlad the pimp says:

        Labour has faced huge problems in our 12 years in power. The fuel crisis, foot and mouth, 9/11, the Iraq war, the 7/7 terrorist attacks, and the banking crisis. In each case we were written off but we weathered the storm and recovered.

        Actually, just looking at that list – apart from 9/11 which can’t reasonably be blamed on this Labour government every other single ‘crisis’ was actually the direct fault of the Labour government. That’s the level of goodwill you have squandered. The electorate were prepared to let you get away with that level of idiocy just to teach Thatcher and Major’s governments a ‘lesson’ and you reward the electorates trust by totally destroying the economy.

        It would have been easier to get it right.

        Utter fuckwits.

      • 224
        Nosebag says:

        Harman_Pride let us have a wager on the outcome of the next General Election.
        Say £1000. Lab win I give to the charity of your choice. Cons win and you give to the charity of my choice.
        Here is a chance to underline that that you mean what you say.

      • 270
        Tricky Dicky says:

        Labour will only win if people have gone soft in the head. Let’s list Labour’s crimes for you:

        1. “Whiter than white, purer than pure.” – better ask Bernie Ecclestone about that one.
        2. Taxed pension funds, so that only public sector workers now get final salary schemes.
        3. Brown sold the UK’s gold reserves at a knock down price.
        4. Brown squandered the proceeds of growth, so we were running with a damagingly high PSBR before we ever went into recession. Now, the public finances are stuffed for a generation and will require massive spending cuts and tax rises to fix.
        5. Brown is a boastful idiot who called an “end to boom and bust”.
        6. Devolution to Scotland and Wales has disadvantaged England.
        7. The Iraq War.
        8. Mass immigration – noone voted for that!
        9. Multi culturalism and the destruction of English culture and traditions.
        10. Self appointed PM – Brown was not even elected leader by his own party.
        11. IR35.
        12. The Human Rights Act – an unmitigated disaster for the law abiding citizens of this country.
        13. Relentless dumbing down of educashun.
        14. The death of David Kelly and the Hutton Whitewash.
        15. Mass immigration.
        16. No referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, despite that being a Labour Manifesto pledge in the 2005 election.
        17. Squandering our hard earned tax money on unreformed public services.
        18. Mass immigration.
        19. Sleaze, sleaze, sleaze.
        20. Setting up the FSA which totally failed to regulate the banking industry.
        21. Mass immigration.

        Labour are a bunch of traitors – most of the Government is from north of the border, does not like England or the English and it shows.

    • 186
      vlad the pimp says:

      If the economy ‘improves’ by next May it will be a temporary ‘fix’ at the expense of an ocean of borrowed and printed cash that will destroy us. If it hasn’t already. Which I think it has.

      I know that. You know that. And you know that we know that. Labour’s only hope of re-election is to convince enough stupid people that printing exponential amounts of cash indefinitely constitutes a ‘prudent’ economic future. Just like Robert Mugabe.

      With the BBC on-side you may manage it. But essentially Labour have us all on the road to financial and political hell.

      • 194

        You complete gimp. There is no similarity whatsoever between our position and Mugabe’s. You are making your side look even more deluded that you already are!

        Go Fourth’s response to Dan Hannan

      • 213
        vlad the pimp says:

        The only difference between Gordon Brown and Robert Mugabe’s approach to finance is that Robert Mugabe is black. And has had a few years longer to fuck up the economy. Bob didn’t manage it overnight either. It took a good 12 years or so before he really started trashing the currency.

      • 218
        denverthen says:

        Cor, how many draperbot ‘prides’ are there?!

        Same (very sad) one?

      • 231
        Plato says:

        Mr Den, they are all Derek Draper.

        How hilarious it is to hear him told to ’shut up’ and edited from R4’s Womans’ Hour download, told to ’shut up’ on The Daily Politics…need I say more?

      • 246
        vlad the pimp says:

        Good effort trying to get a few hits on whatever shit rebuttal you’ve cobbled together though. God knows you’ve had enough time. Good idea too to go to more trafficked political sites rather than relying on whatever blows into Labourlies.

        I haven’t clicked on it. You’ll have to keep hitting ‘refresh’ a lot if you’re going to beat Hannan.

      • 247
        The big D says:

        Gordon Pride @185.

        Nice to see the come 4th response to Dan Hanan relies on music to try and drown his message. It this the on-line version of sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting la la la ?

      • 250
        denverthen says:

        Cheers Plato – makes sense.

        Just saw this too:

        Accurate.

    • 211
      YouDontKnowWhatPrideIs says:

      It’s nice to see the Pride family out again today. I wonder if they are being paid (possibly by taxpayers) to come on here and write such utter nonsense.We’ve had it all now. The Iraq War, dodgy dossiers, Gordon Brown’s saving grace, Tractor stats and now opinion polls.

      Is this one of Brown’s British jobs for British people initiatives?

      Or are you all related to the late Jade Goody?

      • 254

        Actually it’s now just Dolly himself, all the work-experience rebutters threw in the towel after his appalling recent TV “outings”. That and the stench in the office from his refusing to even have a Glaswegian shower and being too mean to pay for air-con. Or maybe just too skint for air-con or deoderant, after all he’s not going to generate any advertising revenue and his latest book is already being remaindered. Poor old Kate’s best earning years are behind her, and Anton’s latest love-child will further ruin her figure, making it more difficult to get well paid show biz roles in future. And another mouth to feed, without any real input from the real father, it all adds up. No wonder Dolly gets all shouty.

    • 269
      Tricky Dicky says:

      Labour will only win if people have gone soft in the head. Let’s list Labour’s crimes for you:

      1. “Whiter than white, purer than pure.” – better ask Bernie Ecclestone about that one.
      2. Taxed pension funds, so that only public sector workers now get final salary schemes.
      3. Brown sold the UK’s gold reserves at a knock down price.
      4. Brown squandered the proceeds of growth, so we were running with a damagingly high PSBR before we ever went into recession. Now, the public finances are stuffed for a generation and will require massive spending cuts and tax rises to fix.
      5. Brown is a boastful idiot who called an “end to boom and bust”.
      6. Devolution to Scotland and Wales has disadvantaged England.
      7. The Iraq War.
      8. Mass immigration – noone voted for that!
      9. Multi culturalism and the destruction of English culture and traditions.
      10. Self appointed PM – Brown was not even elected leader by his own party.
      11. IR35.
      12. The Human Rights Act – an unmitigated disaster for the law abiding citizens of this country.
      13. Relentless dumbing down of educashun.
      14. The death of David Kelly and the Hutton Whitewash.
      15. Mass immigration.
      16. No referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, despite that being a Labour Manifesto pledge in the 2005 election.
      17. Squandering our hard earned tax money on unreformed public services.
      18. Mass immigration.
      19. Sleaze, sleaze, sleaze.
      20. Setting up the FSA which totally failed to regulate the banking industry.
      21. Mass immigration.

      Labour are a bunch of traitors – most of the Government is from north of the border, does not like England or the English and it shows.

  60. 168
    dorzey says:

    Total Expenses Claimed = £86,781,205

    Avg. Expense Claim = £134,544

  61. 174
    Polly Turbot says:

    Ohh look West London’s favourite couple of looters, the fucking disgraceful Keens….. trousered £313,714.

    Not worth a fucking penny those two Hoons.

  62. 180
    Thegriffinster says:

    Wow!

    Looks like nice work if you can get it…

  63. 183
    manwithastick says:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoon#Anti-hoon_legislation_in_Australia

    OT – Apparently Australia has taken measures against Hoon. I suggest a motion be brought forward proposing our very own anti-hoon measures -involving ropes and land rope involved..

  64. 184
    Shit-Bag says:

    I think MPs are worth every penny. And if they want to claim every penny, they are perfectly entitled to do so.

    I would happily give my house, my business, my wife, my daughters and all my pets to my local MP because I think he is doing such a fine job.

    He makes at least one speech and turns up to at least four debates every year. He occasionally appears on Question Time, too.

    And unlike you misanthropes and ne’er’-do-wells, I am not going to whinge because he spends the odd £20,000 on butt-plugs and cock-rings.

    Stop being so beastly, all of you.

  65. 192
    Vulpus_rex says:

    Top trougher is Anne Keen £167,306

    Least trougher is Philip HolloBone £40,433

  66. 196
    Mothers Pride says:

    Labour are a bunch of publically funded onanists

  67. 202
    Piers F-D says:

    I know this is hardly the forum to stick up for MPs but it is surely worth pointing out that most of the money claimed is for office running costs incl. staff. 2nd homes aside this seems fairly bona fide stuff to me.

    • 259
      Ruth Kelly's plaything says:

      I see your point, but such is my cynicism about how many of them view the job, I suspect that some might rent otherwise unlettable offices from family members, rent PCs and furniture at inflated prices from brothers-in-law and pay otherwise unemployable spouses handsome salaries for….what? That would ensure that taxpayers’ money stays in the family.

      I don’t imagine there to be any audit of exactly what an ‘employee’ does for their money. It’s only when some fiddle is so blatant and a whistle-blower lets on (which I guess may have happened to that Tory, Derek thingy, whose sons were paid while at university).

      Unfortunately the only alternative seems to be to put the whole thing in the hands of the civil service who would provide local offices for all, paid for centrally. They would, of course, ensure that costs rocket even higher.

      However, I WOULD rent or buy some redundant hotel or other in Pimlico or Bayswater (not top addresses, but walking distance to the HoC), convert it to lots of simple, single rooms and make them use that for overnights. Instant removal of the ’second homes’ excuse and the associated allowance.

  68. 203
    Thegriffinster says:

    I’m just a thick farmboy, so perhaps I am barking up the wrong haystack, so to speak…

    Can anyone explain to me how Gordon can claim £17,073 as a cost for staying away from home when he gets a free grace and favour home a few hundred yards from parliament? Surely it is not shoe leather, as I am sure he gets a free car (?) with driver to take him that distance anyway.

    I must be missing something….

  69. 220

    Check this out everyone!

  70. 227
    Derek Draper says:

    Hi Guys

    Did you see me on telly today-im dead important me.

    Im much more important than you because I bought er obtained my qualifications online.Not many sad acts like me can attain such heights.

    Glad to see my boys are keeping you busy-im glad you have all forgotten about my comment on Camerons dead son that I instructed Inquisition to post.

    Please visit my very popular blog-have i told you I was on telly today.

    I could talk all day about me-I remember when I found a bloke called Anton in my wardrobe…….blah blah blah blah

  71. 229
    The Inquisition says:

    Wanking on the Taxpayer=Labour

  72. 244
    fukdifino says:

    My thieving fucker James Plaskitt has taken the £ 23083 and knocked exactly £199 off it to keep it out of the mainstream. Who the fuck do you think you are kidding Plaskitt?

  73. 245
    Anonymous says:

    Top trougher is Anne Keen £167,306

    That’s exactly 7.25 Hoons

    What a Hoon

  74. 248
    Anonymous says:

    Nice to see that my MP (David Laws) hasn’t been too despicable.

    Also, am I the only one who finds the posts of Gorgon_Pride and his (its?) little chums to be really quite creepy? Hoons.

  75. 249
    Anonymous says:

    Apologies if this has been pointed out before:

    A quick glance through the numbers show that all of the cabinet, as far as I can see, are charging well in excess of a hundred grand for what are supposed to be staff and communications allowances. this by the very people who, literally, have paid armies of trained beaurocrats to answer their every whim.

    – So, what the fuck is going on, Murphy, Broon, Darling, Millibands ?

    PS I see Tony Blair managed to snidey a last wee handout of 63 grand before his tearful exit.

  76. 253
    Anonymous says:

    Can someone explain why the spawn of satan otherwise known as Blair is getting a bloody penny in 2008?!

  77. 258
    Kev says:

    £2887 for communications? How many Nokias does that buy??

  78. 261
    Anonymous says:

    Dolly Draper also posts on House Price Crash as Patprimer74 and Wires74. Now his true identity has been exposed his posts have suddenly stopped.

    On HPC he is just a sad Troll. It seems he has found a new home here on Guido.

    Just to remind you… Don’t feed the Troll. Just ignore Pride this and Pride that.
    Draper is a scruffy bully. A bit like his unstable, depressed, alcoholic pornorapher mate Campbell.

    What a pair of idiots.

    • 264
      vlad the pimp says:

      I thought Dolly was famously illiterate. As well as being famously underqualified. Whereas while ***_pride may be posting bollocks at least it’s spelt proper innit. Or is he just a cut’n'paste man for Labour’s Ministry of (mis)Information.

  79. 265

    More from the Smith/Timney expenses file:

    £ 29 – drinks (Rector Al Probe)
    £45 – breakfast (Bart Plugg)
    £ 50 – taxi back from the US Embassy reception (Chuck Ingthiogout)
    £ 16 – taxi to Indian Embassy (meeting with Ram Pan Trabit)
    £ 275 – dinner with Russian Ambassador/Thai Consul (Krimov/Sum Yung Gai)

    • 288

      You forgot:

      £182 – dinner with Chinese Interior Minister (Fel Ching)
      £35 – lunch with Navaho representative (Sopi Titwank)
      £300,000 – kebabs.

      Home Economics Secretary – she learnt to cook the books at uni.

  80. 267

    My expenses were probably 1/5 of the average MP’s, and I wasted around 3-4 hours every month sorting them out. Conservatively speaking someone, either the MP or a flunkey, must therefore be spending the thick end of 2 days per month justifying these payments. Given that around 85% (if I recall) of Acts are rubberstamped EU Directives, that probably means around half of an MP’s actual work output is on their cashola claim. Nice work if you can get it.

  81. 271
    Tricky Dicky says:

    You sad bastard!

  82. 272
    Tricky Dicky says:

    Don’t worry about Gordon_pride, Labour_pride, Harman_pride and the other saddos – they are just Draper’s little helpers.

  83. 276

    [...] Here’s a nice pdf of their 07-08 expenses. Hat tip The Last Ditch and Guido. [...]

  84. 278
    mister ed says:

    Here’s mine – Maria Miller, Basingstoke MP

    £23,000 for “staying away from home”.

    Basingstoke is about 40 minutes from Waterloo by regular commuter train, that only stops at Woking on the way in. Thousands, like me , do it every day.
    Costs a bit over £400 per month : thats £4800 a year.

    And i have to pay that out of my AFTER TAX wages.

    23000 – 4800 comes to 18,200 : 18,200 / 12 months comes to £1516 PER MONTH.

    so whats so fucking important that she has to stay up in westminister all the time, especially since our parliament votes on fuck all ( the EU does that for us with 80 per cent of laws) and spends half its time in recess.

    they really are taking the fucking piss. corrupt shower of wasters.

    The original Guido Fawkes had the right fucking idea.

  85. 290
    hawk says:

    Any MP claiming under 100k should get a letter of thanks. Except the Rt Hon Tony Blair, who is a fucker and doesn’t deserve thanks for anything.

  86. 291
    Anthony Thompson says:

    Thanks Guido,

    What’s the bet no response on the following?

    FOR THE ATTENTION OF:

    Helen Southworth MP
    Warrington South

    Tuesday 31 March 2009
    Anthony Thompson
    *address removed*

    Dear Helen Southworth,

    I am writing to you to try and find out what local issues you represented in Parliament over the last year, where you dissented from the government and constructively aided the local area and to get to the bottom of how you have represented the people, any more than a party based stooge who will advance the Labour Party’s national agenda at the expense of their local constituents.

    I am writing under the assumption that the expenses claims listed here : http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/HoCallowances0708.pdf are accurate for the 07-08 year.

    I note that you have spent over £17,000 staying away from home, clearly this has been a pressing matter for some MPs over the previous few days and weeks but I note your voting record in parliament: 76% of votes have been attended according to your affiliation, that is a rather high amount, and we are not exactly close to Westminster It is also a reduction of £4000 from the year before, which must be commended against a perceived culture of greed in expenses claims set out in the mainstream media.

    Your office running costs 06-07 were £20,871 and staffing costs £77,123. To an outsider looking at this situation, it seems a lot of money, that if the amount of votes attended were reduced to a reasonable level (i.e. vote on contentious issues, ones where your vote will count, attend when you have a point to make or a point to hear, matters of local importance etc.) your time would be freed up to cover your staff, also your expenses for staying away from home would fall. This could save a considerable amount of money and raise efficiency. Your costs have changed to £17,630 and £85,361 respectively. That is over a 10% rise in staffing costs.

    Can you please let me know if your office is available longer, if your staff were doing an unsuitable job previously and how many more hours a week of labour this additional cash has provided for the local area. I am interested in how this investment has been to the benefit of myself, a tax payer in your constituency. Obviously with the staff you have I would expect a response to this letter.

    I am very concerned that whist the people in the town are facing rising pressures, the town centre is in dilapidated condition, shops are closing down, houses are being boarded up, people are in a state of desperation and the effective level of taxation has risen you have done nothing to say to your party “enough is enough,” you have been sitting on your hands and towing the party line, serving entirely the Labour party as your master and ignoring your constituents. There is little evidence that our tax money is going towards anything for the local community, the township or the people and is serving entirely a party that has led this country to ruin.

    When you decided to become an MP, I would hope you thought “I will make the world a better place”, and I would hope your priority would’ve been the people that elect you. Please provide some evidence that this is true. Obviously if you do not respond this letter will be published to show your disregard for the local community.

    From your record on theyworkforyou.com I can find no support for a claim that you dissent from Labour, your questions raised in the House seem planted and the views you vote in favoor of are clearly opposed by your constituents.

    Frankly, in summary, I feel ripped off. Please try to persuade me this is not the case.

    Yours sincerely,

    Anthony Thompson

  87. 292
    Persephone says:

    Spelman seems to be spending about 30k less on staff than most of the others. Must have fired the nanny.

  88. 293

    [...] Beleaguered : The Harping Monkey…+++ MP’s Expense Totals Released for 2008 +++ – Guy Fawkes’ blog…Personality Types, according to Helen Fisher (I’m a Negotiator) « Spread Hope Like [...]

  89. 11
    Auntie Climax says:

    Did it get lonely at sea?

  90. 34
    dr. sipp says:

    cant get download

    anyone cut an paste

    thx

  91. 157
    Minekiller says:

    You are late for your shift at McDonald’s

  92. 53
  93. 125

    Dr Sipp – who is your MP?

  94. Morning Campers says:

    He or she is your Member of Parliament







Sarah Palin said…

“A year later, I gotta ask the supporters of all that, ‘How’s that hopey, changey thing working out for ya?’ “



-Gilts (Mar)
As of 28 Jan 2010 +5.8%

Realtime Portfolio Record


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives









RSS


AddThis Feed Button
Archive



Labels Guido Reads