Sub-Standard

As sent to Times sub-editors:

From : Giles Coren

Chaps,

I am mightily pissed off. I have addressed this to Owen, Amanda and Ben because I don’t know who i am supposed to be pissed off with (i’m assuming owen, but i filed to amanda and ben so it’s only fair), and also to Tony, who wasn’t here – if he had been I’m guessing it wouldn’t have happened.

I don’t really like people tinkering with my copy for the sake of tinkering. I do not enjoy the suggestion that you have a better ear or eye for how I want my words to read than I do. Owen, we discussed your turning three of my long sentences into six short ones in a single piece, and how that wasn’t going to happen anymore, so I’m really hoping it wasn’t you that fucked up my review on saturday.

It was the final sentence. Final sentences are very, very important. A piece builds to them, they are the little jingle that the reader takes with him into the weekend.

I wrote: “I can’t think of a nicer place to sit this spring over a glass of rosé and watch the boys and girls in the street outside smiling gaily to each other, and wondering where to go for a nosh.”
it appeared as: “I can’t think of a nicer place to sit this spring over a glass of rosé and watch the boys and girls in the street outside smiling gaily to each other, and wondering where to go for nosh.”

There is no length issue. This is someone thinking “I’ll just remove this indefinite article because Coren is an illiterate Hunt and i know best”.

Well, you fucking don’t.

This was shit, shit sub-editing for three reasons.

1) ‘Nosh’, as I’m sure you fluent Yiddish speakers know, is a noun formed from a bastardisation of the German ‘naschen’. It is a verb, and can be construed into two distinct nouns. One, ‘nosh’, means simply ‘food’. You have decided that this is what i meant and removed the ‘a’. I am insulted enough that you think you have a better ear for English than me. But a better ear for Yiddish? I doubt it. Because the other noun, ‘nosh’ means “a session of eating” – in this sense you might think of its dual valency as being similar to that of ‘scoff’. you can go for a scoff. or you can buy some scoff. the sentence you left me with is shit, and is not what i meant. Why would you change a sentnece aso that it meant something i didn’t mean? I don’t know, but you risk doing it every time you change something. And the way you avoid this kind of fuck up is by not changing a word of my copy without asking me, okay? it’s easy. Not. A. Word. Ever.
2) I will now explain why your error is even more shit than it looks. You see, i was making a joke. I do that sometimes. I have set up the street as “sexually-charged”. I have described the shenanigans across the road at G.A.Y.. I have used the word ‘gaily’ as a gentle nudge. And “looking for a nosh” has a secondary meaning of looking for a blowjob. Not specifically gay, for this is soho, and there are plenty of girls there who take money for noshing boys. “looking for nosh” does not have that ambiguity. the joke is gone. I only wrote that sodding paragraph to make that joke. And you’ve fucking stripped it out like a pissed Irish plasterer restoring a renaissance fresco and thinking jesus looks shit with a bear so plastering over it. You might as well have removed the whole paragraph. I mean, fucking christ, don’t you read the copy?
3) And worst of all. Dumbest, deafest, shittest of all, you have removed the unstressed ‘a’ so that the stress that should have fallen on “nosh” is lost, and my piece ends on an unstressed syllable. When you’re winding up a piece of prose, metre is crucial. Can’t you hear? Can’t you hear that it is wrong? It’s not fucking rocket science. It’s fucking pre-GCSE scansion. I have written 350 restaurant reviews for The Times and i have never ended on an unstressed syllable. Fuck. fuck, fuck, fuck.

I am sorry if this looks petty (last time i mailed a Times sub about the change of a single word i got in all sorts of trouble) but i care deeply about my work and i hate to have it fucked up by shit subbing.



Tip offs: 0709 284 0531
team@Order-order.com

GuidoFawkes Quote of the Day

Mary Creagh’s coded attack on Ed Miliband…

‘I want the country to be united behind a single vision, we aren’t going to do it by sort of having a Rubik’s Cube approach to politics’. 

Top Posts This Week

Guidogram: Sign up

Subscribe to the most succinct 7 days a week daily email read by thousands of Westminster insiders.

Facebook

UN WARNS THERESA MAY OVER SNAPCHAT UN WARNS THERESA MAY OVER SNAPCHAT
Environment Minister Totty Watch: Double Trouble Edition Environment Minister Totty Watch: Double Trouble Edition
PPS Reshuffle in Full PPS Reshuffle in Full
Irish billionaire injuncting media Irish billionaire injuncting media
GIANT JUMPING ROBOT CHEETAHS GIANT JUMPING ROBOT CHEETAHS
Carswell: It Was Ugly Carswell: It Was Ugly

Tom Watson’s Militant Money Tom Watson’s Militant Money
CLIMATE CHANGE COULD TRANSFORM HULL INTO ‘VENICE OF THE NORTH’ CLIMATE CHANGE COULD TRANSFORM HULL INTO ‘VENICE OF THE NORTH’
TAXPAYERS’ DE-RISKING VENTURE CAPITALISM TAXPAYERS’ DE-RISKING VENTURE CAPITALISM
It’s Not Easy Being A Green Tesla Driver It’s Not Easy Being A Green Tesla Driver
Investors Dumping Mirror Shares Investors Dumping Mirror Shares
BBC Conditioning Public to Back UN Climate Agreement BBC Conditioning Public to Back UN Climate Agreement
The Queen: Psychoactive Drugs The Queen: Psychoactive Drugs
Fifa Was Doooooomed! Fifa Was Doooooomed!
Mary Creagh’s Leadership Bid Crashes and Burns Mary Creagh’s Leadership Bid Crashes and Burns
Top LibDem: All MPs Lie Top LibDem: All MPs Lie
Awkward Ed Bercow Moment Awkward Ed Bercow Moment
Algenol: Fuel of the Future Algenol: Fuel of the Future
ENCRYPTION COMPANY HEADS TO SWITZERLAND TO FLEE NSA ENCRYPTION COMPANY HEADS TO SWITZERLAND TO FLEE NSA