Who are the two who want Dave to go?
At this preliminary stage the intention is to convene a legal conference before the end of the month and go through the issues and examine the possible approaches including the establishment of a vehicle with a legally qualified advisory committee.
Guido is keenly aware of potential hurdles and risks. Surely the Attorney General will not be able to argue that the public interest is best served by turning a blind eye to what was manifestly an attempt to circumvent the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 Act? How will the public interest be harmed by testing in a court before a jury the legality of the Loans for Lordships scheme?
One example will give you a flavour of the Loans for Lordships scheme – Gulam Noon has publicly stated that he made a £250,000 donation to the Labour party, which he correctly submitted (via Downing Street) on his vetting papers for the House of Lords Appointments Commission. Two days later on October 5, 2005 Lord Levy, Gulam Noon reportedly claims, telephoned him and referred to the £250,000 donation as a “loan” which need not be disclosed on his vetting papers. The Levy-intercepted and revised vetting papers were submitted to the House of Lords Appointments Commission, now without mention of the £250,000 “loan” / donation. When the Commission independently discovered the existence of the “loan” / donation they blocked the peerage – as presumably Lord Levy knew they would – why else would he intervene in the process? What was the Labour party’s chief fundraiser doing intervening in the honours process anyway? Prima facie there is a case to answer. If the CPS won’t bring it, they should at least not attempt to block others from doing so.
UPDATE : The first target of one hundred people making pledges of financial support for a private prosecution has been met in less than 24 hours.
BBC Trust on Back Foot | Standard
Politicians Should Be Paid Like Strippers | Standard
Keith Vaz Says Fellow MP ‘Needs More Sex’ | Speccie
Savile Stink Returns | The Week
Sadiq Khan’s Support for Babar Ahmad | Wandsworth Guardian
Pollard Penny Drops For Patten | Speccie
Good Morning Mark Thompson, Anything to Say? | MediaGuido
Cameron Dodging Questions on Murder Suspect Invite | Scrapbook
WATCH: Mandela Memorial Signer Speaks | MediaGuido
Days of Cheap Energy Are Over | Peter Glover
The Veolia Affair: Who Knew? | Bishop Hill
Earlsfield resident Olivia Seccombe writing to the Wandsworth Guardian:
“I would like to question the judgement of Tooting’s Member of Parliament, Sadiq Khan, now Babar Ahmad has been found guilty of running websites that allegedly sought to raise money, recruit fighters and seek equipment for terrorists in Afghanistan and Chechnya… Now this man has been found guilty – after a full and fair trial in the States – I would like Mr Khan to answer firstly, what his concerns with the legal process were and secondly, why he spent so much time campaigning for this man when he should have been representing Tooting in Parliament?”