<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Mandate for New Labour in England</title>
	<atom:link href="http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/</link>
	<description>Parliamentary plots and conspiracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toque</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toque]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.order-order.com/2005/05/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that you can make such clear cut left-right distinctions these days.  Labour&#039;s policy on Foundation hospitals and top-up fees would certainly have been defeated in a more balanced parliament.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that you can make such clear cut left-right distinctions these days.  Labour&#8217;s policy on Foundation hospitals and top-up fees would certainly have been defeated in a more balanced parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: col</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[col]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.order-order.com/2005/05/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the conservatives support PR they will be justified in criticising the unrepresentative result created by the FPTP system they support. However then of course they would have to find another party to form a majority government with. Good luck with that!&lt;br/&gt;And even if the FPTP result were a little  less biased in England, with a share of the popular vote of about &lt;1 seat more than Labour, wouldnt there be a hung parliament? In that case, if we consider the LibDems position to the left of Labour, then of course the fair centre of gravity for a government would be towards the Labour party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the conservatives support PR they will be justified in criticising the unrepresentative result created by the FPTP system they support. However then of course they would have to find another party to form a majority government with. Good luck with that!<br />And even if the FPTP result were a little  less biased in England, with a share of the popular vote of about &lt;1 seat more than Labour, wouldnt there be a hung parliament? In that case, if we consider the LibDems position to the left of Labour, then of course the fair centre of gravity for a government would be towards the Labour party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Dickson</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Dickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.order-order.com/2005/05/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trackback:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Minority Rule - will the Tories play their English card?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://scottish-independence.blogspot.com/2005/05/minority-rule-will-tories-play-their.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;excerpt: &lt;i&gt;&quot;... or from the Sunday newspapers, Scotland on Sunday:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rifkind revives West Lothian question&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He was speaking as analysis showed that, with Tony Blair’s majority cut to 67, Labour now relies entirely on the 70 seats of Scottish and Welsh MPs to pass legislation, even though those MPs do not represent their constituents on devolved matters.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rifkind said: &quot;Decisions that only effect England should only be decided by... &quot;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trackback:</p>
<p><b>Minority Rule &#8211; will the Tories play their English card?</b></p>
<p><a href="http://scottish-independence.blogspot.com/2005/05/minority-rule-will-tories-play-their.html" rel="nofollow">http://scottish-independence.blogspot.com/2005/05/minority-rule-will-tories-play-their.html</a></p>
<p>excerpt: <i>&#8220;&#8230; or from the Sunday newspapers, Scotland on Sunday:</p>
<p>Rifkind revives West Lothian question</p>
<p>He was speaking as analysis showed that, with Tony Blair’s majority cut to 67, Labour now relies entirely on the 70 seats of Scottish and Welsh MPs to pass legislation, even though those MPs do not represent their constituents on devolved matters.</p>
<p>Rifkind said: &#8220;Decisions that only effect England should only be decided by&#8230; &#8220;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonkotsane</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wonkotsane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.order-order.com/2005/05/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a shame that the CEP are not political Gareth, you would certainly be able to gather some willing &quot;troops&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.thecep.org.uk/news/ViewItem.asp?Entry=421&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Minority Rule&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the CEP are not political Gareth, you would certainly be able to gather some willing &#8220;troops&#8221;.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.thecep.org.uk/news/ViewItem.asp?Entry=421" REL="nofollow">Minority Rule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toque</title>
		<link>http://order-order.com/2005/05/08/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toque]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.order-order.com/2005/05/no-mandate-for-new-labour-in-england/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did tell you that the Tories would win in England but not in the UK as a whole.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(Actually that&#039;s not quite what I said but it&#039;s what I meant http://thecep.org.uk/news/ViewItem.asp?Entry=409 )&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It worked out just as I wanted. Just goes to show, if you wish hard enough, and vote enough times....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did tell you that the Tories would win in England but not in the UK as a whole.</p>
<p>(Actually that&#8217;s not quite what I said but it&#8217;s what I meant <a href="http://thecep.org.uk/news/ViewItem.asp?Entry=409" rel="nofollow">http://thecep.org.uk/news/ViewItem.asp?Entry=409</a> )</p>
<p>It worked out just as I wanted. Just goes to show, if you wish hard enough, and vote enough times&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

