Otis is currently on police bail following his arrest after the incident and has since vowed to defy a ban on hunting when it comes into force in February. Ferry, who is the joint master of the South Shropshire Hunt, stormed the Houses of Parliament in September during a debate on fox hunting.
You read here first, and I read it in the Shropshire Star.
Because on her hubbies’ website is this;
Statement on Barbara Follett MP’s parliamentary expenses
Barbara Follett makes no financial gain from being a Member of Parliament – in fact her work is heavily subsidised by her husband, Ken Follett.
The expenses she claims from the House of Commons Fees Office amount to less than half the actual cost of doing her job. She puts her entire salary back into her office, taking nothing for herself. But, as this does not cover all the costs, Ken subsidises her.
In the financial year 2003-2004, it cost Barbara £275,695 to do her work as the MP for Stevenage. Two thirds of this amount went on paying her staff in her Stevenage and Westminster offices.
But she claimed only £118,214 in expenses. She contributed her entire salary of £55,118 to meet some of the difference. The remaining £102, 673 was met by Ken.
Ken Follett said: “I’m not complaining – I’m very happy to help Barbara serve the people of Stevenage in this way. We have released these figures only because some newspaper stories have given the impression that our lifestyle is being subsidised by the taxpayer. In fact, it’s the other way around.”
Barbara and Ken Follett
Doesn’t your heart bleed for the Follet’s scrimping by on their multi-million annual income…
Guido (virile but married incidentally, with an heir on the way) fears for the poor monkey, where will it end? Monkey needs loving!
UPDATE :
He’s now got Linda Perham MP to propose an EDM on Bananas to impress Ms Banana Link. He’s arranging a photo-opportunity as well… Monkey – let it go son, there’s plenty more bananas on the tree.On the other hand if you are a judge, lucky you! Lord Falconer, the PM’s former flatmate and fellow barrister has persuaded Tony that including judges in the controversial pensions cap plan could discourage wealthy barristers from joining the bench. They will now not be affected by the new rules, announced in this year’s budget, that allow individuals to claim tax relief only up to a cap of £1.5m of their pension savings. Handy if Cherie becomes a judge, eh?
Fatty Falconer argued that the cap on pensions could otherwise discourage barristers, who take a big pay cut to join the bench and cannot return to their former work after joining the judiciary to increase their earnings near retirement.
John Prescott, spoke out against the plan on behalf of the working classes, arguing it would be unfair and politically controversial to exempt well-paid namby-pamby lawyers from rules that apply to the rest of society. David Willetts, the Tory pensions spokesman, also criticised the move as “one rule for part of the public sector and one different one for everyone else”.